research-article

RepliGES and GEStory: Visual Tools for Systematizing and Consolidating Knowledge on User-Defined Gestures

Authors:

Bogdan-Florin Gheran,

Santiago Villarreal-Narvaez,

Radu-Daniel Vatavu,

Jean VanderdoncktAuthors Info & Claims

AVI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces

Article No.: 5, Pages 1 - 9

https://doi.org/10.1145/3531073.3531112

Published: 06 June 2022 Publication History

Abstract

The body of knowledge accumulated by gesture elicitation studies (GES), although useful, large, and extensive, is also heterogeneous, scattered in the scientific literature across different venues and fields of research, and difficult to generalize to other contexts of use represented by different gesture types, sensing devices, applications, and user categories. To address such aspects, we introduce RepliGES, a conceptual space that supports (1) replications of gesture elicitation studies to confirm, extend, and complete previous findings, (2) reuse of previously elicited gesture sets to enable new discoveries, and (3) extension and generalization of previous findings with new methods of analysis and for new user populations towards consolidated knowledge of user-defined gestures. Based on RepliGES, we introduce GEStory, an interactive design space and visual tool, to structure, visualize and identify user-defined gestures from a number of 216 published gesture elicitation studies.

Supplemental Material

ZIP File

Supplemental videos

Download
66.91 MB

References

[1]

ACM. 2018. Artifact Review and Badging – Version 1.0 (not current). https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/artifact-review-badging

[2]

ACM. 2020. Artifact Review and Badging - Current. https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/artifact-review-and-badging-current

[3]

Christopher Ahlberg and Ben Shneiderman. 1994. Visual Information Seeking: Tight Coupling of Dynamic Query Filters with Starfield Displays. In Proc. of CHI ’94. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 313–317. https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191775

Digital Library

[4]

Roland Aigner, Daniel Wigdor, Hrvoje Benko, Michael Haller, David Lindbauer, Alexandra Ion, Shengdong Zhao, and Jeffrey Tzu Kwan Valino Koh. 2012. Understanding Mid-Air Hand Gestures: A Study of Human Preferences in Usage of Gesture Types for HCI. Technical Report MSR-TR-2012-111. Microsoft Research.

[5]

Abdullah X. Ali, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2018. Crowdsourcing Similarity Judgments for Agreement Analysis in End-User Elicitation Studies. In UIST ’18. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 177–188.

[6]

Abdullah X. Ali, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2019. Crowdlicit: A System for Conducting Distributed End-User Elicitation and Identification Studies. In Proc. of CHI ’19. ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 255, 12 pages.

Digital Library

[7]

Gilles Bailly, Thomas Pietrzak, Jonathan Deber, and Daniel J. Wigdor. 2013. Métamorphe: Augmenting Hotkey Usage with Actuated Keys. In CHI ’13. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 563–572. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470734

Digital Library

[8]

Fabien C.Y. Benureau and Nicolas P. Rougier. 2018. Re-run, Repeat, Reproduce, Reuse, Replicate: Transforming Code into Scientific Contributions. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 11 (2018), 69. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2017.00069

[9]

Laura Bianca Bilius and Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2021. A Multistudy Investigation of Drivers and Passengers’ Gesture and Voice Input Preferences for In-Vehicle Interactions. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems 25, 2 (2021), 197–220.

[10]

Gaëlle Calvary, Joëlle Coutaz, David Thevenin, Quentin Limbourg, Laurent Bouillon, and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2003. A Unifying Reference Framework for multi-target user interfaces. Interacting with Computers 15, 3 (2003), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(03)00010-9

[11]

Edwin Chan, Teddy Seyed, Wolfgang Stuerzlinger, Xing-Dong Yang, and Frank Maurer. 2016. User Elicitation on Single-Hand Microgestures. In CHI’16. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3403–3414. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858589

Digital Library

[12]

Tilman Dingler, Rufat Rzayev, Alireza Sahami Shirazi, and Niels Henze. 2018. Designing Consistent Gestures Across Device Types: Eliciting RSVP Controls for Phone, Watch, and Glasses. In CHI ’18. ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 419, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173993

Digital Library

[13]

Guiying Du, Auriol Degbelo, Christian Kray, and Marco Painho. 2018. Gestural Interaction with 3D Objects Shown on Public Displays: An Elicitation Study. IxD&A 38(2018), 184–202. https://dblp.org/rec/journals/ixda/DuDKP18

[14]

Florian Echtler and Maximilian Häuundefinedler. 2018. Open Source, Open Science, and the Replication Crisis in HCI. In CHI EA ’18. ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article alt02, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188395

Digital Library

[15]

Mingming Fan, Zhen Li, and Franklin Mingzhe Li. 2021. Eyelid Gestures for People with Motor Impairments. Commun. ACM 65, 1 (dec 2021), 108–115.

Digital Library

[16]

Bogdan-Florin Gheran, Jean Vanderdonckt, and Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2018. Gestures for Smart Rings: Empirical Results, Insights, and Design Implications. In DIS ’18. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 623–635. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196741

Digital Library

[17]

Bogdan-Florin Gheran, Radu-Daniel Vatavu, and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2018. Ring X2: Designing Gestures for Smart Rings Using Temporal Calculus. In DIS ’18 Companion. ACM, NY, USA, 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197391.3205422

Digital Library

[18]

Omar S. Gómez, Natalia Juristo, and Sira Vegas. 2010. Replications Types in Experimental Disciplines. In ESEM ’10. ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 3, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1852786.1852790

Digital Library

[19]

Steven N. Goodman, Daniele Fanelli, and John P.A. Ioannidis. 2016. What Does Research Reproducibility Mean?Science Translational Medicine 8, 341 (June 2016), 341ps12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027

[20]

Christian Greiffenhagen and Stuart Reeves. 2013. Is Replication Important for HCI?. In Proc. of the CHI ’13 Workshop on the Replication of HCI Research. CEUR-WS, Paris, France, 1–6. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-976

[21]

Yves Guiard. 1987. Asymmetric Division of Labor in Human Skilled Bimanual Action: The Kinematic Chain as a Model. Journal of Motor Behavior 19 (1987), 486–517. http://www.cogprints.org/625/1/jmb_87.html

[22]

Zhifan He, Ruifo Zhang, Zheng Liu, and Zhengyu Tan. 2020. A User-Defined Gesture Set for Natural Interaction in a Smart Kitchen Environment. In Proc. of ISCID ’20. IEEE, Washington, D.C., USA, 122–125.

[23]

Florian Heller, Kashyap Todi, and Kris Luyten. 2021. An Interactive Design Space for Wearable Displays. In Proc. of MobileHCI ’21. ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447526.3472034

Digital Library

[24]

Lynn Hoff, Eva Hornecker, and Sven Bertel. 2016. Modifying Gesture Elicitation: Do Kinaesthetic Priming and Increased Production Reduce Legacy Bias?. In TEI ’16. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2839472

Digital Library

[25]

Kasper Hornbæk. 2015. We Must Be More Wrong in HCI Research. Interactions 22, 6 (2015), 20–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/2833093

Digital Library

[26]

Kasper Hornbæk, Søren S. Sander, Javier Andrés Bargas-Avila, and Jakob Grue Simonsen. 2014. Is Once Enough? On the Extent and Content of Replications. In CHI ’14. ACM, NY, USA, 3523–3532. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557004

Digital Library

[27]

Robert Johansen. 1991. Groupware: Future directions and wild cards. J. Organizational Computing 1, 2 (1991), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919399109540160

[28]

Adam Kendon. 1997. Gesture. Annual Review of Anthropology 26 (1997), 109–128. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2952517

[29]

Panayiotis Koutsabasis and Panagiotis Vogiatzidakis. 2019. Empirical Research in Mid-Air Interaction: A Systematic Review. Int. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 35, 18 (2019), 1747–1768. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1572352

[30]

Byron Lahey, Audrey Girouard, Winslow Burleson, and Roel Vertegaal. 2011. PaperPhone: Understanding the Use of Bend Gestures in Mobile Devices with Flexible Electronic Paper Displays. In CHI ’11. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1303–1312. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979136

Digital Library

[31]

Luis A. Leiva, Daniel Martín-Albo, and Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2017. Synthesizing Stroke Gestures Across User Populations: A Case for Users with Visual Impairments. In Proc. of CHI ’17. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4182–4193.

Digital Library

[32]

David R. Lenorovitz, Mark D. Phillips, R.S. Ardrey, and Gregory V. Kloster. 1984. A taxonomic approach to characterizing human-computer interaction. In Human-Computer Interaction. (1984). Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 111–116.

[33]

Nathan Magrofuoco, Jorge Luis Pérez-Medina, Paolo Roselli, Jean Vanderdonckt, and Santiago Villarreal. 2019. Eliciting Contact-Based and Contactless Gestures With Radar-Based Sensors. IEEE Access 7(2019), 176982–176997.

[34]

Nathan Magrofuoco and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2019. Gelicit: A Cloud Platform for Distributed Gesture Elicitation Studies. PACMHCI 3, EICS, Article 6(2019), 41 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3331148

Digital Library

[35]

Meredith Ringel Morris. 2012. Web on the Wall: Insights from a Multimodal Interaction Elicitation Study. In ITS ’12. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2396636.2396651

Digital Library

[36]

Meredith Ringel Morris, Andreea Danielescu, Steven Drucker, Danyel Fisher, Bongshin Lee, m.c. schraefel, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2014. Reducing Legacy Bias in Gesture Elicitation Studies. Interactions 21, 3 (2014), 40–45.

Digital Library

[37]

Miguel A. Nacenta, Yemliha Kamber, Yizhou Qiang, and Per Ola Kristensson. 2013. Memorability of Pre-Designed and User-Defined Gesture Sets. In CHI ’13. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1099–1108. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466142

Digital Library

[38]

Michael Nebeling, Alexander Huber, David Ott, and Moira C. Norrie. 2014. Web on the Wall Reloaded: Implementation, Replication and Refinement of User-Defined Interaction Sets. In ITS ’14. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 15–24.

[39]

Prasad Patil, Roger D. Peng, and Jeffrey T. Leek. 2019. A Visual Tool for Defining Reproducibility and Replicability. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3(2019), 650–652.

[40]

Roger D. Peng. 2011. Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science 334, 6060 (2011), 1226–1227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847

[41]

Thammathip Piumsomboon, Adrian Clark, Mark Billinghurst, and Andy Cockburn. 2013. User-Defined Gestures for Augmented Reality. In CHI EA ’13. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 6 pages. doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468527

Digital Library

[42]

Hans E. Plesser. 2018. Reproducibility vs. Replicability: A Brief History of a Confused Terminology. Front. Neuroinf. 11(2018), 76.

[43]

Stefan Pröll, Kristof Meixner, and Andreas Rauber. 2016. Precise Data Identification Services for Long Tail Research Data. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.3847632

[44]

Julie Rico and Stephen Brewster. 2010. Usable Gestures for Mobile Interfaces: Evaluating Social Acceptability. In Proc. of CHI ’10. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 887–896. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753458

Digital Library

[45]

Isabel B. Rodriguez and Nicolai Marquardt. 2017. Gesture Elicitation Study on How to Opt-in & Opt-out from Interactions with Public Displays. In Proc. of ISS ’17. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132272.3134118

Digital Library

[46]

Jaime Ruiz, Yang Li, and Edward Lank. 2011. User-Defined Motion Gestures for Mobile Interaction. In CHI ’11. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 197–206.

[47]

Karen Rust, Meethu Malu, Lisa Anthony, and Leah Findlater. 2014. Understanding Childdefined Gestures and Children’s Mental Models for Touchscreen Tabletop Interaction. In IDC ’14. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 201–204.

[48]

Geir Kjetil Sandve, Anton Nekrutenko, James Taylor, and Eivind Hovig. 2013. Ten Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational Research. PLoS Computational Biology 9, 10 (2013), e1003285. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003285

[49]

Ovidiu-Andrei Schipor and Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2018. Invisible, Inaudible, and Impalpable: Users’ Preferences and Memory Performance for Digital Content in Thin Air. IEEE Pervasive Computing 17, 4 (2018), 76–85.

[50]

Jonathan W. Schooler. 2014. Metascience Could Rescue the “Replication Crisis”. Nature 515, 9 (2014), 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/515009a

[51]

Douglas Schuler and Aki Namioka. 1993. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ.

Digital Library

[52]

Nikita Soni, Schuyler Gleaves, Hannah Neff, Sarah Morrison-Smith, Shaghayegh Esmaeili, Ian Mayne, Sayli Bapat, Carrie Schuman, Kathryn A. Stofer, and Lisa Anthony. 2019. Do User-Defined Gestures for Flatscreens Generalize to Interactive Spherical Displays for Adults and Children?. In PerDis ’19. ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 24, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3321335.3324941

Digital Library

[53]

Nikita Soni, Schuyler Gleaves, Hannah Neff, Sarah Morrison-Smith, Shaghayegh Esmaeili, Ian Mayne, Sayli Bapat, Carrie Schuman, Kathryn A. Stofer, and Lisa Anthony. 2020. Adults’ and Children’s Mental Models for Gestural Interactions with Interactive Spherical Displays. In CHI ’20. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–12.

[54]

Vuletic Tijana, Alex Duffy, Laura Hay, Chris McTeague, Gerard Campbell, and Madeleine Grealy. 2019. Systematic literature review of hand gestures used in human computer interaction interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 129 (2019), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.03.011

Digital Library

[55]

Giovanni M. Troiano, Esben W. Pedersen, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2014. User-Defined Gestures for Elastic, Deformable Displays. In AVI ’14. ACM, USA, 1–8.

[56]

Theophanis Tsandilas. 2018. Fallacies of Agreement: A Critical Review of Consensus Assessment Methods for Gesture Elicitation. TOCHI 25, Article 18 (2018), 49 pages. http://doi.org/10.1145/3182168

Digital Library

[57]

Eric W.K. Tsang and Kai-Man Kwan. 1999. Replication and Theory Development in Organizational Science: A Critical Realist Perspective. The Academy of Management Review 24, 4 (1999), 759–780. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/259353

[58]

Radu-Daniel Vatavu and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2022. Clarifying Agreement Calculations and Analysis for End-User Elicitation Studies. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 29, 1 (2022), 5:1–5:70. https://doi.org/10.1145/3476101

Digital Library

[59]

Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2012. User-Defined Gestures for Free-Hand TV Control. In EuroITV ’12. ACM, NY, USA, 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1145/2325616.2325626

Digital Library

[60]

Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2019. The Dissimilarity-Consensus Approach to Agreement Analysis in Gesture Elicitation Studies. In CHI ’19. ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 224, 13 pages. doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300454

Digital Library

[61]

Radu-Daniel Vatavu, Daniel Vogel, Géry Casiez, and Laurent Grisoni. 2011. Estimating the Perceived Difficulty of Pen Gestures. In INTERACT’11. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 89–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23771-3_9

[62]

Radu-Daniel Vatavu and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2015. Formalizing Agreement Analysis for Elicitation Studies: New Measures, Significance Test, and Toolkit. In CHI ’15. ACM, NY, USA, 1325–1334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702223

Digital Library

[63]

Radu-Daniel Vatavu and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2016. Between-Subjects Elicitation Studies: Formalization and Tool Support. In CHI ’16. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 13 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858228

Digital Library

[64]

Radu-Daniel Vatavu and Ionut-Alexandru Zaiti. 2014. Leap Gestures for TV: Insights from an Elicitation Study. In TVX ’14. ACM, NY, USA, 131–138.

[65]

Santiago Villarreal-Narvaez, Jean Vanderdonckt, Radu-Daniel Vatavu, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2020. A Systematic Review of Gesture Elicitation Studies: What Can We Learn from 216 Studies?. In DIS ’20. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 855–872. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395511

Digital Library

[66]

Panagiotis Vogiatzidakis and Panayiotis Koutsabasis. 2018. Gesture Elicitation Studies for Mid-Air Interaction: A Review. MTI 2, 4 (2018), 1–21.

[67]

Martin Weigel, Vikram Mehta, and Jürgen Steimle. 2014. More than Touch: Understanding How People Use Skin as an Input Surface for Mobile Computing. In CHI ’14. ACM, NY, USA, 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557239

Digital Library

[68]

Max L. Wilson, Wendy Mackay, Ed Chi, Michael Bernstein, Dan Russell, and Harold Thimbleby. 2011. RepliCHI - CHI Should Be Replicating and Validating Results More: Discuss. In CHI EA’11. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 463–466.

Digital Library

[69]

Jacob O. Wobbrock, Htet Htet Aung, Brandon Rothrock, and Brad Myers. 2005. Maximizing the Guessability of Symbolic Input. In CHI EA’05. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4 pages. http://doi.org/10.1145/1056808.1057043

Digital Library

[70]

Jacob O. Wobbrock, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Andrew D. Wilson. 2009. User-Defined Gestures for Surface Computing. In CHI ’09. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518866

Digital Library

Cited By

Villarreal-Narvaez SSluÿters AVanderdonckt JVatavu R(2024)Brave New GES World: A Systematic Literature Review of Gestures and Referents in Gesture Elicitation StudiesACM Computing Surveys10.1145/363645856:5(1-55)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3636458
Andrei ABilius LVatavu R(2024)Take a Seat, Make a Gesture: Charting User Preferences for On-Chair and From-Chair Gesture InputProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642028(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642028
Cheng YWu ZXiao R(2024)Exploring Methods to Optimize Gesture Elicitation Studies: A Systematic Literature ReviewIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.338726912(64958-64979)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3387269
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

User-defined gestures for surface computing
CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Many surface computing prototypes have employed gestures created by system designers. Although such gestures are appropriate for early investigations, they are not necessarily reflective of user behavior. We present an approach to designing tabletop ...
Brave New GES World: A Systematic Literature Review of Gestures and Referents in Gesture Elicitation Studies
How do we determine highly effective and intuitive gesture sets for interactive systems tailored to end users’ preferences? A substantial body of knowledge is available on this topic, among which gesture elicitation studies stand out distinctively. In ...
Theoretically-Defined vs. User-Defined Squeeze Gestures

This paper presents theoretical and empirical results about user-defined gesture preferences for squeezable objects by focusing on a particular object: a deformable cushion. We start with a theoretical analysis of potential gestures for this squeezable ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

AVI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces

June 2022

414 pages

ISBN:9781450397193

DOI:10.1145/3531073

General Chair:
Paolo Bottoni
Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
,
Program Chair:
Emanuele Panizzi
Sapienza University of Rome, Italy

Copyright © 2022 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 June 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Data Availability

Supplemental videos https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3531073.3531112#GEStory.zip

Funding Sources

Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization

Conference

AVI 2022

AVI 2022: International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces

June 6 - 10, 2022

Frascati, Rome, Italy

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 128 of 490 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

8
Total Citations
View Citations
145
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)37
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Villarreal-Narvaez SSluÿters AVanderdonckt JVatavu R(2024)Brave New GES World: A Systematic Literature Review of Gestures and Referents in Gesture Elicitation StudiesACM Computing Surveys10.1145/363645856:5(1-55)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3636458
Andrei ABilius LVatavu R(2024)Take a Seat, Make a Gesture: Charting User Preferences for On-Chair and From-Chair Gesture InputProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642028(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642028
Cheng YWu ZXiao R(2024)Exploring Methods to Optimize Gesture Elicitation Studies: A Systematic Literature ReviewIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.338726912(64958-64979)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3387269
Rubab SZaman MRashid UYu LWu Y(2024)Audio-visual training and feedback to learn touch-based gesturesJournal of Visualization10.1007/s12650-024-01012-x27:6(1117-1142)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-024-01012-x
Gheran BVatavu RVanderdonckt J(2023)New Insights into User-Defined Smart Ring Gestures with Implications for Gesture Elicitation StudiesExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3585590(1-8)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544549.3585590
Bilius LUngurean OVatavu R(2023)Understanding Wheelchair Users’ Preferences for On-Body, In-Air, and On-Wheelchair GesturesProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580929(1-16)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3580929
Vatavu R(2023)iFAD Gestures: Understanding Users’ Gesture Input Performance with Index-Finger Augmentation DevicesProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580928(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3580928
Şiean APamparău CSluÿters AVatavu RVanderdonckt J(2023)Flexible gesture input with radars: systematic literature review and taxonomy of radar sensing integration in ambient intelligence environmentsJournal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing10.1007/s12652-023-04606-914:6(7967-7981)Online publication date: 10-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-023-04606-9

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten