The Impact of Near-Future Mixed Reality Contact Lenses on Users' Lives via an Immersive Speculative Enactment and Focus Groups
Article No.: 9, Pages 1 - 13
Abstract
In this paper we investigate the impact of near-future Mixed Reality (MR) contact lenses on users’ everyday lives via an Immersive Speculative Enactment (ISE) and focus groups. If or when MR technology advances to the same level of ubiquitousness of current smartphones, this is likely to have a large impact on people’s everyday lives. To gain qualitative insight on this impact, we created an ISE in which participants could experience a simulated MR lens prototype together in groups of four, thereby expanding the ISE method to multiple participants for the first time. This was followed by a focus group, in which the impact of the MR lenses was discussed. Participants raised concerns about the future of social interactions and expressing agency over the device, while also recognising how it could have practical applications. Based on these findings we formulate three guidelines for future MR contact lenses.
Supplemental Material
PDF File
List of possible MR applications presented to participants during the focus group.
- Download
- 2.67 MB
References
[1]
Melvin Abraham, Pejman Saeghe, Mark Mcgill, and Mohamed Khamis. 2022. Implications of XR on Privacy, Security and Behaviour: Insights from Experts. In Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference(NordiCHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3546155.3546691
[2]
Devon Adams, Alseny Bah, Catherine Barwulor, Nureli Musabay, Kadeem Pitkin, and Elissa M. Redmiles. 2018. Ethics emerging: the story of privacy and security perceptions in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth USENIX Conference on Usable Privacy and Security(SOUPS ’18). USENIX Association, USA, 443–458.
[3]
Fouad Alallah, Ali Neshati, Yumiko Sakamoto, Khalad Hasan, Edward Lank, Andrea Bunt, and Pourang Irani. 2018. Performer vs. observer: whose comfort level should we consider when examining the social acceptability of input modalities for head-worn display?. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology(VRST ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3281505.3281541
[4]
Apple. 2023. WWDC 2023 - June 5 | apple. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYkq9Rgoj8E. Accessed: 06-06-2023.
[5]
Jonas Auda, Uwe Gruenefeld, Sarah Faltaous, Sven Mayer, and Stefan Schneegass. 2023. A Scoping Survey on Cross-Reality Systems. ACM Comput. Surv. 56, 4, Article 83 (oct 2023), 38 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3616536
[6]
Azalea Vision. 2023. Smart vision solutions. https://azaleavision.com/. Accessed: 09-01-2023.
[7]
Laura Barendregt and Nora S. Vaage. 2021. Speculative Design as Thought Experiment. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 7, 3 (Sept. 2021), 374–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2021.06.001
[8]
Elise Bonnail, Wen-Jie Tseng, Mark Mcgill, Eric Lecolinet, Samuel Huron, and Jan Gugenheimer. 2023. Memory Manipulations in Extended Reality. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580988
[9]
Jolie Bonner, Florian Mathis, Joseph O’Hagan, and Mark Mcgill. 2023. When Filters Escape the Smartphone: Exploring Acceptance and Concerns Regarding Augmented Expression of Social Identity for Everyday AR. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology(VRST ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3611659.3615707
[10]
Albert Borgman. 1999. Holding on the Reality: The Nature of Information at the Turn of the Millennium. Journal of social work education 35, 3 (1999), 487–487. Place: Washington Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
[11]
Torie Bosch. 2012. Sci-Fi Writer Bruce Sterling Explains the Intriguing New Concept of Design Fiction. Slate (March 2012). https://slate.com/technology/2012/03/bruce-sterling-on-design-fictions.html
[12]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (Jan. 2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[13]
Robbe Cools, Ozan Balcı, Binh Vinh Duc Nguyen, Andrew Vande Moere, and Adalberto L. Simeone. 2024. How a Vertical Surface Supports Cross-Reality Transitional Interface Tasks at Different Virtuality Levels. In Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces(AVI ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3656650.3656762
[14]
Robbe Cools, Augusto Esteves, and Adalberto L. Simeone. 2022. Blending Spaces: Cross-Reality Interaction Techniques for Object Transitions Between Distinct Virtual and Augmented Realities. In 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). 528–537. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR55827.2022.00069 ISSN: 1554-7868.
[15]
Robbe Cools, Jihae Han, and Adalberto L. Simeone. 2021. SelectVisAR: Selective Visualisation of Virtual Environments in Augmented Reality. In DIS 2021 - Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference: Nowhere and Everywhere. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462096
[16]
Paul Coulton, Dan Burnett, and Adrian Gradinar. 2016. Games as Speculative Design: Allowing Players to Consider Alternative Presents and Plausible Futures. https://www.drs2016.org/015. Accessed: 16-12-2022.
[17]
Alexis Elder. 2014. Excellent online friendships: an Aristotelian defense of social media. Ethics and Information Technology 16, 4 (Dec. 2014), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-014-9354-5
[18]
Chris Elsden, David Chatting, Abigail C. Durrant, Andrew Garbett, Bettina Nissen, John Vines, and David S. Kirk. 2017. On Speculative Enactments. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5386–5399. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025503
[19]
Pablo Gallego Cascón, Denys J.C. Matthies, Sachith Muthukumarana, and Suranga Nanayakkara. 2019. ChewIt. An Intraoral Interface for Discreet Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300556
[20]
Ceenu George, An Ngo Tien, and Heinrich Hussmann. 2020. Seamless, Bi-directional Transitions along the Reality-Virtuality Continuum: A Conceptualization and Prototype Exploration. In Proceedings - 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 2020. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 412–424. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR50242.2020.00067
[21]
Google. 2023. Google Glass – Introducing Glass Enterprise Edition 2. https://www.google.com/glass/start/. Accessed: 09-01-2023.
[22]
Matt Gottsacker, Nahal Norouzi, Kangsoo Kim, Gerd Bruder, and Greg Welch. 2021. Diegetic Representations for Seamless Cross-Reality Interruptions. In ISMAR. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR52148.2021.00047
[23]
Matt Gottsacker, Raiffa Syamil, Pamela Wisniewski, Gerd Bruder, Carolina Cruz-Neira, and Gregory Welch. 2022. Exploring Cues and Signaling to Improve Cross-Reality Interruptions. In 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct). 827–832. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct57072.2022.00179 ISSN: 2771-1110.
[24]
Jan Gugenheimer, Christian Mai, Mark McGill, Julie Williamson, Frank Steinicke, and Ken Perlin. 2019. Challenges Using Head-Mounted Displays in Shared and Social Spaces. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3299028
[25]
Jan Gugenheimer, Evgeny Stemasov, Julian Frommel, and Enrico Rukzio. 2017. ShareVR: Enabling co-located experiences for virtual reality between HMD and Non-HMD users. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, Vol. 2017-May. Association for Computing Machinery, 4021–4033. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025683
[26]
Jan Gugenheimer, Evgeny Stemasov, Harpreet Sareen, and Enrico Rukzio. 2018. FaceDisplay: Towards asymmetric multi-user interaction for nomadic virtual reality. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, Vol. 2018-April. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, New York, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173628
[27]
Jan Gugenheimer, Wen-Jie Tseng, Abraham Hani Mhaidli, Jan Ole Rixen, Mark McGill, Michael Nebeling, Mohamed Khamis, Florian Schaub, and Sanchari Das. 2022. Novel Challenges of Safety, Security and Privacy in Extended Reality. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3503741
[28]
Jaybie A.D.E. Guzman, Kanchana Thilakarathna, and Aruna Seneviratne. 2019. Security and privacy approaches in mixed reality: A literature survey. Comput. Surveys 52, 6 (Oct. 2019), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359626 arXiv:1802.05797 Publisher: Association for Computing Machinery.
[29]
Ida Marie Henriksen, Marianne Skaar, and Aksel Tjora. 2020. The Constitutive Practices of Public Smartphone Use. Societies 10, 4 (Dec. 2020), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10040078 Number: 4 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
[30]
Innovega. 2022. AR/VR needs a contact lens. We built it.https://innovega.io/. Accessed: 09-01-2023.
[31]
Author Julian. 2009. Design Fiction: A Short Essay on Design, Science, Fact and Fiction. https://blog.nearfuturelaboratory.com/2009/03/17/design-fiction-a-short-essay-on-design-science-fact-and-fiction/. Accessed: 16-12-2022.
[32]
Julie. [n. d.]. VR for Public and Social Settings | Future Immersive Interaction Group. http://juliericowilliamson.com/blog/vr-for-public-and-social-settings/. Accessed: 22-11-2022.
[33]
Kiron Lebeck, Kimberly Ruth, Tadayoshi Kohno, and Franziska Roesner. 2018. Towards Security and Privacy for Multi-user Augmented Reality: Foundations with End Users. In 2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP). 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2018.00051 ISSN: 2375-1207.
[34]
Victor Luckerson. 2015. Google glass ends explorer beta program. https://time.com/3669927/google-glass-explorer-program-ends/. Accessed: 09-01-2023.
[35]
McGill, Mark. 2021. The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Extended Reality (XR) Report–Extended Reality (XR) and the Erosion of Anonymity and Privacy. Extended Reality (XR) and the Erosion of Anonymity and Privacy - White Paper (Nov. 2021), 1–24. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9619999 Conference Name: Extended Reality (XR) and the Erosion of Anonymity and Privacy - White Paper.
[36]
Joshua McVeigh-Schultz, Max Kreminski, Keshav Prasad, Perry Hoberman, and Scott S. Fisher. 2018. Immersive Design Fiction: Using VR to Prototype Speculative Interfaces and Interaction Rituals within a Virtual Storyworld. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 817–829. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196793
[37]
Daniel Medeiros, Romane Dubus, Julie Williamson, Graham Wilson, Katharina Pöhlmann, and Mark McGill. 2023. Surveying the Social Comfort of Body, Device, and Environment-Based Augmented Reality Interactions in Confined Passenger Spaces Using Mixed Reality Composite Videos. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 7, 3, Article 113 (sep 2023), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610923
[38]
Microsoft. 2020. Microsoft-Rocketbox. https://github.com/microsoft/Microsoft-Rocketbox. Accessed: 27-05-2023.
[39]
Paul Milgram, Haruo Takemura, Akira Utsumi, and Fumio Kishino. 1995. Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. In Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, Vol. 2351. SPIE, 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.197321
[40]
Mojo Vision. 2023. What if Tomorrow you could...https://www.mojo.vision/. Accessed: 09-01-2023.
[41]
Calkin S. Montero, Jason Alexander, Mark T. Marshall, and Sriram Subramanian. 2010. Would you do that? understanding social acceptance of gestural interfaces. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services(MobileHCI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 275–278. https://doi.org/10.1145/1851600.1851647
[42]
Phuong Nguyen, Long Khanh-Dao Le, Dieu Nguyen, Lan Gao, David W. Dunstan, and Marj Moodie. 2020. The effectiveness of sedentary behaviour interventions on sitting time and screen time in children and adults: an umbrella review of systematic reviews. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 17, 1 (Sept. 2020), 117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-01009-3
[43]
Nreal Air. 2023. Give the Gift of AR. https://www.nreal.ai/air/. Accessed: 09-01-2023.
[44]
William Odom, John Zimmerman, Scott Davidoff, Jodi Forlizzi, Anind K. Dey, and Min Kyung Lee. 2012. A fieldwork of the future with user enactments. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 338–347. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318008
[45]
Joseph O’Hagan, Jan Gugenheimer, Jolie Bonner, Florian Mathis, and Mark McGill. 2023. Augmenting People, Places & Media: The Societal Harms Posed by Everyday Augmented Reality, and the Case for Perceptual Human Rights. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia(MUM ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1145/3626705.3627782
[46]
Joseph O’Hagan, Pejman Saeghe, Jan Gugenheimer, Daniel Medeiros, Karola Marky, Mohamed Khamis, and Mark McGill. 2023. Privacy-Enhancing Technology and Everyday Augmented Reality: Understanding Bystanders’ Varying Needs for Awareness and Consent. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 4 (Jan. 2023), 177:1–177:35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3569501
[47]
Jay A. Olson, Dasha A. Sandra, Denis Chmoulevitch, Amir Raz, and Samuel P. L. Veissière. 2021. A nudge-based intervention to reduce problematic smartphone use: Randomised controlled trial. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tjynk
[48]
Photon Engine. 2023. Photon. https://www.photonengine.com/. Accessed: 27-05-2023.
[49]
Leigh Ramsey Buchanan, Cherie R. Rooks-Peck, Ramona K. C. Finnie, Holly R. Wethington, Verughese Jacob, Janet E. Fulton, Donna B. Johnson, Leila C. Kahwati, Charlotte A. Pratt, Gilbert Ramirez, Shawna L. Mercer, and Karen Glanz. 2016. Reducing Recreational Sedentary Screen Time: A Community Guide Systematic Review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 50, 3 (March 2016), 402–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.09.030
[50]
Julie Rico and Stephen Brewster. 2010. Usable gestures for mobile interfaces: evaluating social acceptability. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 887–896. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753458
[51]
Radiah Rivu, Yasmeen Abdrabou, Ken Pfeuffer, Augusto Esteves, Stefanie Meitner, and Florian Alt. 2020. StARe: Gaze-Assisted Face-to-Face Communication in Augmented Reality. In ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (Stuttgart, Germany) (ETRA ’20 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 14, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3379157.3388930
[52]
Franziska Roesner, Tadayoshi Kohno, and David Molnar. 2014. Security and privacy for augmented reality systems. Commun. ACM 57, 4 (April 2014), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1145/2580723.2580730
[53]
Antti Salovaara, Antti Oulasvirta, and Giulio Jacucci. 2017. Evaluation of Prototypes and the Problem of Possible Futures. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2064–2077. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025658
[54]
Valentin Schwind, Jens Reinhardt, Rufat Rzayev, Niels Henze, and Katrin Wolf. 2018. Virtual reality on the go? a study on social acceptance of VR glasses. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct(MobileHCI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236112.3236127
[55]
Adalberto L. Simeone, Robbe Cools, Stan Depuydt, João Maria Gomes, Piet Goris, Joseph Grocott, Augusto Esteves, and Kathrin Gerling. 2022. Immersive Speculative Enactments: Bringing Future Scenarios and Technology to Life Using Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517492
[56]
Mel Slater, Cristina Gonzalez-Liencres, Patrick Haggard, Charlotte Vinkers, Rebecca Gregory-Clarke, Steve Jelley, Zillah Watson, Graham Breen, Raz Schwarz, William Steptoe, Dalila Szostak, Shivashankar Halan, Deborah Fox, and Jeremy Silver. 2020. The Ethics of Realism in Virtual and Augmented Reality. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 1 (2020). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frvir.2020.00001
[57]
Snap Inc.2023. Spectacles by Snap Inc. The next generation of Spectacles. https://www.spectacles.com/. Accessed: 09-01-2023.
[58]
Maximilian Speicher, Brian D. Hall, and Michael Nebeling. 2019. What is Mixed Reality?. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300767
[59]
Wen-Jie Tseng, Elise Bonnail, Mark McGill, Mohamed Khamis, Eric Lecolinet, Samuel Huron, and Jan Gugenheimer. 2022. The Dark Side of Perceptual Manipulations in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517728
[60]
Unity Technologies. 2018. XR Interaction Toolkit: XR interaction toolkit: 2.3.2. https://docs.unity3d.com/Packages/[email protected]/manual/index.html. Accessed: 27-05-2023.
[61]
Unity Technologies. 2023. Unity game engine. https://unity.com/. Accessed: 27-05-2023.
[62]
Martin Usoh, Ernest Catena, Sima Arman, and Mel Slater. 2000. Using presence questionnaires in reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 9, 5 (2000), 497–503. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474600566989 ISBN: 1054-7460.
[63]
Natalie Van Delm, Robbe Cools, and Adalberto L. Simeone. 2023. Investigating the Effect of Material and Shape Abstraction on Object Recognition for Private Objects in Augmented Reality Environments. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia(MUM ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 486–488. https://doi.org/10.1145/3626705.3631784
[64]
Julie Williamson. [n. d.]. Being Social in XR with Stable Interpersonal Realities | Future Immersive Interaction Group. http://juliericowilliamson.com/blog/being-social-in-xr-with-stable-interpersonal-realities/. Accessed: 22-11-2022.
[65]
Julie R. Williamson, Andrew Crossan, and Stephen Brewster. 2011. Multimodal mobile interactions: usability studies in real world settings. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on multimodal interfaces(ICMI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1145/2070481.2070551
[66]
Julie R. Williamson, Mark McGill, and Khari Outram. 2019. PlaneVR: Social acceptability of virtual reality for aeroplane passengers. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300310
[67]
Ruth Wong. 2023. When no one can go to school: does online learning meet students’ basic learning needs?Interactive Learning Environments 31, 1 (Jan. 2023), 434–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1789672 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1789672.
[68]
Keng Ta Yang, Chiu Hsuan Wang, and Liwei Chan. 2018. ShareSpace: Facilitating shared use of the physical space by both VR head-mounted display and external users. In UIST 2018 - Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Vol. 18. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, New York, New York, USA, 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242587.3242630
[69]
Laura Zimmermann. 2021. “Your Screen-Time App Is Keeping Track”: Consumers Are Happy to Monitor but Unlikely to Reduce Smartphone Usage. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research 6, 3 (July 2021), 377–382. https://doi.org/10.1086/714365 Publisher: The University of Chicago Press.
Index Terms
- The Impact of Near-Future Mixed Reality Contact Lenses on Users' Lives via an Immersive Speculative Enactment and Focus Groups
Recommendations
Regulating the Metaverse, a Blueprint for the Future
Extended RealityAbstractThe core Immersive Media (IM) technologies of Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) have steadily advanced over the last thirty years, enabling high fidelity experiences at consumer prices. Over the same period, networking speeds have ...
Exploring Extended Reality Multi-Robot Ground Control Stations
AVI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Advanced Visual InterfacesThis paper presents work-in-progress research exploring the use of extended reality headsets to overcome the intrinsic limitations of conventional, screen-based ground control stations. Specifically, we discuss an extended reality ground control station ...
Adding Force Feedback to Mixed Reality Experiences and Games using Electrical Muscle Stimulation
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe present a mobile system that enhances mixed reality experiences and games with force feedback by means of electrical muscle stimulation (EMS). The benefit of our approach is that it adds physical forces while keeping the users' hands free to interact ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2024
396 pages
ISBN:9798400710889
DOI:10.1145/3677386
Copyright © 2024 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 07 October 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia and LARSyS
- Internal Funds KU Leuven
Conference
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 86 of 279 submissions, 31%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 97Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)97
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format