Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1718918.1718950acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multiple mouse text entry for single-display groupware

Published: 06 February 2010 Publication History

Abstract

A recent trend in interface design for classrooms in developing regions has many students interacting on the same display using mice. Text entry has emerged as an important problem preventing such mouse-based singledisplay groupware systems from offering compelling interactive activities. We explore the design space of mouse-based text entry and develop 13 techniques with novel characteristics suited to the multiple mouse scenario. We evaluated these in a 3-phase study over 14 days with 40 students in 2 developing region schools. The results show that one technique effectively balanced all of our design dimensions, another was most preferred by students, and both could benefit from augmentation to support collaborative interaction. Our results also provide insights into the factors that create an optimal text entry technique for single-display groupware systems.

Supplementary Material

JPG File (p169-amershi.jpg)
MOV File (p169-amershi.mov)

References

[1]
Banks,D.A. (2006). Audience Response Systems in Higher Education: Applications and Cases. Information Science Publishing.
[2]
Beatty, I. (2004). Transforming Student Learning with Classroom Communication Systems. EducCause Center for Applied Research (ECAR), Research Bulletin, 3.
[3]
Card, S.K., Moran, T.P. and Newell, A.S. (1983) The power law of practice. In The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 57--65.
[4]
Fleetwood, M.D., and Fick, C.S. (2004) Input rates for a one-handed input device (OHAI) for Chinese text entry. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.
[5]
Gay, L.R. (1980). The Comparative Effects of Multiple-Choice versus Short-Answer Tests on Retention. Journal of Educational Measurement 17 (1): 45--50
[6]
Inkpen, K., Ho-Ching, W., Keuderle, O., Scott, S.D., and Shoemaker, G. (1999). This is fun! We're all best friends and we're all playing: supporting children's synchronous collaboration. CSCL 1999.
[7]
Isokoski, P., and MacKenzie, I.S. (2003). Metrics for Text Entry Research: Combined Model for Text Entry Rate Development. CHI 2003, 752--753.
[8]
MacKenzie, I.S. (2002). Mobile Text Entry Using Three Keys. NordiCHI 2002, 27--34.
[9]
MacKenzie, I.S. and Soukoreff, R.W. (2003). Phrase Sets for Evaluating Text Entry Techniques. CHI 2003, 754--755.
[10]
MacKenzie, I.S. Tanaka-Ishii, K. (2007). Text Entry Systems: Mobility, Accessibility, Universality. Morgan Kauffman.
[11]
Moraveji, N., Kim, T., Ge, J., Pawar, U.S., Mulcahy, K., and Inkpen, K. (2008). Mischief: Supporting Remote Teaching in Developing Regions. CHI 2008, 353--362.
[12]
Moraveji, N., Inkpen, K., Cutrell, E., Balakrishnan, R. (2009) A Mischief of Mice: Examining Children's Performance in Single Display Groupware Systems with 1 to 32 Mice. CHI 2009, 2157--2166.
[13]
Moraveji, N., Lindgren, R., Pea, R. (2009). Organized Mischief: Comparing Shared and Private Displays on a Collaborative Learning Task. Extended abstracts of CSCL 2009. Rhodes, Greece.
[14]
Negroponte, N. One Laptop Per Child. http://laptop.org.
[15]
Newell, A. and Rosenbloom, P.S. (1981). Mechanisms of Skill Acquisition and the Law of Practice. In Anderson J.R. (ed.) Cognitive Skills and their Acquisition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
[16]
Pal, J., Pawar, U.S., Brewer, E., and Toyama, K. (2006) The case for multi-user design for computer aided learning in developing regions. WWW 2006, 781--789
[17]
Pawar, U.S., Pal, J., Gupta. R., Toyama, K. (2007) Multiple Mice for Retention Tasks in Disadvantaged Schools. CHI 2007, 1581--1590.
[18]
Pawar, U.S., Pal, J., Uppala, S., and Toyama, K. (2006) Effective Educational Delivery in Rural Computer Aided Education: Multimouse. DL 2006.
[19]
Patra, R., Pal, J., Nedevschi, S., Plauche, M., and Pawar, U. (2007). Usage Models of Classroom Computing in Developing Regions. ICTD 2007, 158--167.
[20]
Pavlovych, A., Stuerzlinger, W. (2002) Model for Non-Expert Text Entry Speed on 12-Button Phone Keypads. CHI 2002.
[21]
Pawar, U.S., Pal, J., Toyama, K. (2006). Multiple Mice for Computers in Education in Developing Countries. ICTD.
[22]
Pierpoint, W.G. (2002). The Art and Skill of Radio Telegraphy: A Manual for Learning, Using, Mastering and Enjoying the International Morse Code as a Means of Communication. http://www.qsl.net/n9bor/n0hff.htm.
[23]
Raynal, M., and Vigouroux, N. (2005). Genetic Algorithm to Generate Optimized Soft Keyboard. CHI 2005, 1729--1732.
[24]
Singer, A.J., Murphy, M., S. Hines, M. (2003). Teaching to Learn, Learning to Teach: A Handbook for Secondary School Teachers. Lawrence Erlbaum.
[25]
Soukoreff, R.W., and MacKenzie, I.S. (2003). Metrics for Text Entry Research: An Evaluation of MSD and KSPC, and a New Unified Error Metric. CHI 2003. p. 113--120.
[26]
Stewart, J., Bederson, B.B., & Druin, (1999) A. Single display groupware: a model for co-present collaboration. CHI 1999.
[27]
Swan, K., Kratcosi, A., Hooft, M.V., and Campbell, D. (2007). Technology Support for Whole Class Engagement. Journal of Research Center for Educational Technology, 3(1).
[28]
Wobbrock, J.O. and Myers, B.A. (2006). Trackball text entry for people with motor impairments. CHI 2006, 479--488.
[29]
Wilensky, U. and Stroup, W. (1999). Learning through Participatory Simulations: Network-Based Design for Systems Learning in Classrooms. CSCL 1999.
[30]
Wobbrock, J.O. (2007) Measures of text entry performance. Chapter 3 in Text Entry Systems: Mobility, Accessibility, Universality, I.S. MacKenzie and K. Tanaka-Ishii (eds). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 47--74.
[31]
Wobbrock, J.O. and Myers, B.A. (2006) Analyzing the input stream for character-level errors in unconstrained text entry evaluations. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 13 (4): 458--489.
[32]
Zhai, S., Hunter, M., Smith, B.A. (2002). Performance Optimization of Virtual Keyboards. Human Computer Interaction 17(3): 229--269.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Use of ICTs during ongoing protracted socio-political disruptionsExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3638194(1-6)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2022)“Hartal (Strike) Happens Here Everyday”: Understanding Impact of Disruption on Education in KashmirProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3502126(1-17)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
  • (2021)The Pandemic Shift to Remote Learning under Resource ConstraintsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34760555:CSCW2(1-28)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CSCW '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
February 2010
468 pages
ISBN:9781605587950
DOI:10.1145/1718918
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 February 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. children
  2. education
  3. ictd
  4. multiple mouse
  5. sdg
  6. text entry

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CSCW '10
Sponsor:
CSCW '10: Computer Supported Cooperative Work
February 6 - 10, 2010
Georgia, Savannah, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CSCW '24

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 17 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Use of ICTs during ongoing protracted socio-political disruptionsExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3638194(1-6)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2022)“Hartal (Strike) Happens Here Everyday”: Understanding Impact of Disruption on Education in KashmirProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3502126(1-17)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
  • (2021)The Pandemic Shift to Remote Learning under Resource ConstraintsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34760555:CSCW2(1-28)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021
  • (2020)Challenges and Issues Integrating Smartphones into Teacher Support Programs in IndiaProceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development10.1145/3392561.3394638(1-11)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2020
  • (2019)Engaging Lived and Virtual RealitiesProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300580(1-15)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
  • (2018)Designing for IntersectionsProceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3196709.3196794(45-58)Online publication date: 8-Jun-2018
  • (2017)Care as a Resource in Underserved Learning EnvironmentsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/31347391:CSCW(1-22)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2017
  • (2017)Creative Information Use Among Young AdultsProceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition10.1145/3059454.3059473(407-420)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2017
  • (2017)EduFeedProceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/2998181.2998231(491-504)Online publication date: 25-Feb-2017
  • (2017)Impact of Technology in Collaborative and Interactive Programming Activities: Gathering Children's Feedback2017 5th International Conference in Software Engineering Research and Innovation (CONISOFT)10.1109/CONISOFT.2017.00029(179-183)Online publication date: Oct-2017
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media