The study evaluated, in active elderly women, the accuracy and bias of anthropometry and bioelect... more The study evaluated, in active elderly women, the accuracy and bias of anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) for lower-limb and whole-body tissue composition measures using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the criterion method. Nineteen individuals (66.1 +/- 4.2 years) participated in the study. Whole-body fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) were measured by anthropometry, BIA and DXA. Lower-limb volume (LLV) and lower-limb FFM (LLFFM) were assessed by anthropometry and DXA. LLV and LLFFM were significantly overestimated by anthropometry vs. DXA (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively) but significant relationships were observed [coefficient of determination (R(2)) > 0.25, p < 0.05]. No significant difference was observed between FM(A) (where (A) stands for anthropometry) vs. FM(DXA) and FFM(A) vs. FFM(DXA) and significant relationships were observed [R(2) = 0.93, p < 0.001, coefficient of variation (CV) = 7.3%; and R(2) = 0.85, p < 0.001, CV = 4.4%, respectively]. No significant difference was observed between FM(BIA) and FM(DXA) and a significant relationship was observed (R(2) = 0.80, p < 0.001, CV = 11.6%). FFM was significantly underestimated by BIA vs. DXA (p < 0.01). In active elderly women, (i) compared with DXA, anthropometry overestimates LLV and LLFFM; (ii) anthropometry can be an accurate method for assessing whole-body composition; and (iii) despite a non-significant bias for the FM measurement, the BIA tends to overestimate FM and underestimate FFM.
The study evaluated, in active elderly women, the accuracy and bias of anthropometry and bioelect... more The study evaluated, in active elderly women, the accuracy and bias of anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) for lower-limb and whole-body tissue composition measures using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the criterion method. Nineteen individuals (66.1 +/- 4.2 years) participated in the study. Whole-body fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) were measured by anthropometry, BIA and DXA. Lower-limb volume (LLV) and lower-limb FFM (LLFFM) were assessed by anthropometry and DXA. LLV and LLFFM were significantly overestimated by anthropometry vs. DXA (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively) but significant relationships were observed [coefficient of determination (R(2)) > 0.25, p < 0.05]. No significant difference was observed between FM(A) (where (A) stands for anthropometry) vs. FM(DXA) and FFM(A) vs. FFM(DXA) and significant relationships were observed [R(2) = 0.93, p < 0.001, coefficient of variation (CV) = 7.3%; and R(2) = 0.85, p < 0.001, CV = 4.4%, respectively]. No significant difference was observed between FM(BIA) and FM(DXA) and a significant relationship was observed (R(2) = 0.80, p < 0.001, CV = 11.6%). FFM was significantly underestimated by BIA vs. DXA (p < 0.01). In active elderly women, (i) compared with DXA, anthropometry overestimates LLV and LLFFM; (ii) anthropometry can be an accurate method for assessing whole-body composition; and (iii) despite a non-significant bias for the FM measurement, the BIA tends to overestimate FM and underestimate FFM.
Uploads
Papers by Emmanuel Van Praagh