Natalia Berdnikova
Irkutsk State University, Archaeology and Ethnology, Faculty Member
- Social and Cultural Anthropology, Prehistoric Archaeology, Landscape Archaeology, Archaeological Method & Theory, Cultural Anthropology, Experimental Archaeology, and 15 moreNeolithic Archaeology, Geoarchaeology, Archaeological Science, Archaeological Theory, Ethnoarchaeology, Ethnomethodology, Ethnographic Methods, GeoArcheology, Geoarchaeology and Lithic Studies, Quaternary Geoarchaeology, Geoarchaeology and Paleoenvironmental Reconstructions, Sedimentology, Geomorphology, Geoarchaeology, Geoarchaeology, Soils and Paleoclimate, Isotope geochronology, geoarchaeology and human evolution: Out of Asia, and Stratigraphic Archaeologyedit
The article discusses the problem of creating an interdisciplinary database to support research on the project "Baikal Siberia in the Stone Age: at the crossroads of worlds." The architecture of an integrated information system... more
The article discusses the problem of creating an interdisciplinary database to support research on the project "Baikal Siberia in the Stone Age: at the crossroads of worlds." The architecture of an integrated information system for supporting archaeological research for the formation of a database has been developed. The information system is deployed on two servers that solve separate tasks and is supported by a network storage system. The subsystems are developed using the technology of creating information systems based on the specifications of database applications. Specifications contain, in pure form, the minimum necessary information about database tables, their fields, relationships between them, and their use in the database application. This approach allows you to easily and quickly modernize the information system throughout the entire life cycle. The creation of databases and application specifications is based on the developed standards for geoarchaeological r...
Research Interests:
The time of Sartan glaciation in the Baikal–Yenisei Siberia, is comparable with that of MIS 2 and the deglaciation phase MIS 1. Loess loams, aeolian–colluvial sands and sandy loams represent subaerial sediments. There are four subhorizons... more
The time of Sartan glaciation in the Baikal–Yenisei Siberia, is comparable with that of MIS 2 and the deglaciation phase MIS 1. Loess loams, aeolian–colluvial sands and sandy loams represent subaerial sediments. There are four subhorizons (sr1, sr2, sr3 and sr4) in the Sartan horizon (sr). Sedimentary and soil-forming processes at different stratigraphic levels are considered. Differing soil formation types of cold periods are distinguished. Soils of the interstadial type with the A-C profile are represented only in the Early Sartan section of this paper. The soils of the pleniglacial type are discussed throughout the section. Their initial profile is O-C, TJ-C and W-C. Plant detritus remnants or poor thin humus horizons are preserved in places from the upper horizons. We propose for the first time for the interphasial soil formation type of cold stages to be distinguished. This is represented in the sections by the preserved BCm, BCg, Cm and Cg horizons of 15–20 cm thick. The upper...
Research Interests: Geology and Geosciences
Research Interests:
The paper presents the detailed results of the archaeozoological study of the large mammals from the Shchapova 2 Upper Paleolithic site located in Irkutsk. Excavations in 2019 revealed four conditionally defined horizons with... more
The paper presents the detailed results of the archaeozoological study of the large mammals from the Shchapova 2 Upper Paleolithic site located in Irkutsk. Excavations in 2019 revealed four conditionally defined horizons with archaeological and faunal material; within the studied area subaerial sediments of deluvial origin were uncovered. Layers 3 and 4 were attributed to the Karginian period (MIS 3), layer 2 to the Early Sartanian period (MIS 2), layer 1 to the Holocene (MIS 1). The largest number of bone remains was obtained from layer 4. Altogether we recognized ten taxa: Spermophilus sp., Panthera spelaea, Mammuthus primigenius, Equus sp., Coelodonta antiquitatis, Cervus elaphus, Megaloceros giganteus, Alces alces, Rangifer tarandus, Bison priscus. The species composition of Shchapova 2 site is characteristic of the Late Pleistocene of region with a predominance of horse and steppe bison, diversity of cervids and presence of woolly mammoth and rhinoceros. Most of the bones have ...
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
In studies of ancient communities the most preferred thing is reconstruction of livelihoods of ancient cultures through revealing the features of systems of territoriality within proximics approach with a prudent use of analog... more
In studies of ancient communities the most preferred
thing is reconstruction of livelihoods of ancient cultures through
revealing the features of systems of territoriality within proximics
approach with a prudent use of analog ethnographic and
ethnoarchaeological models. Simulation systems of territoriality
held for the final Paleolithic cultures of the south of Baikal
Siberia based on complex data. Identified discontinuity in the
development of these cultures which is caused by natural
disasters. Their system of territoriality is strongly dependent on a
variety of natural events. The determining factor in the choice of
habitat was their protection from natural hazards, especially
from the various phenomena of seismotectonic character and
strong wind currents. Stabilization of natural conditions led to
multiple use of the same area for living which is reflected in the
multilayer archaeological sites.
Keywords- Baikal Siberia; the final Palaeolithic; the natural
environment; the system of territoriality
thing is reconstruction of livelihoods of ancient cultures through
revealing the features of systems of territoriality within proximics
approach with a prudent use of analog ethnographic and
ethnoarchaeological models. Simulation systems of territoriality
held for the final Paleolithic cultures of the south of Baikal
Siberia based on complex data. Identified discontinuity in the
development of these cultures which is caused by natural
disasters. Their system of territoriality is strongly dependent on a
variety of natural events. The determining factor in the choice of
habitat was their protection from natural hazards, especially
from the various phenomena of seismotectonic character and
strong wind currents. Stabilization of natural conditions led to
multiple use of the same area for living which is reflected in the
multilayer archaeological sites.
Keywords- Baikal Siberia; the final Palaeolithic; the natural
environment; the system of territoriality
Research Interests:
Paleolithic of Baikal Siberia. The reasons of formation of this archaeological break are considered. Results of geoarchaeological researches which have allowed revealing regional speciicity and features of cultures of cultures inal... more
Paleolithic of Baikal Siberia. The reasons of formation of this archaeological break are considered.
Results of geoarchaeological researches which have allowed revealing regional speciicity and features of
cultures of cultures inal Paleolithic of Baikal Siberia is presented. We found that such break represent the
unusual of natural and socio-cultural situations and require deeper research.
Keywords: archaeological break, inal period of the Paleolithic, Baikal Siberia, geoarchaeology
Results of geoarchaeological researches which have allowed revealing regional speciicity and features of
cultures of cultures inal Paleolithic of Baikal Siberia is presented. We found that such break represent the
unusual of natural and socio-cultural situations and require deeper research.
Keywords: archaeological break, inal period of the Paleolithic, Baikal Siberia, geoarchaeology
Research Interests:
The given materials represent a destroyed Neolithic burial found in 1984 on the airport Zhigalovo territory (Upper Lena river). The analysis and the comparison of funeral, burial grounds peculiarities in the Neolithic-Bronze Age of the... more
The given materials represent a destroyed Neolithic burial found in 1984 on the
airport Zhigalovo territory (Upper Lena river). The analysis and the comparison of funeral,
burial grounds peculiarities in the Neolithic-Bronze Age of the Cis-Baikal were held judging
by stable signs of funeral traditions. By these revealed particularities the Zhigalovo burial slightly differs from other Neolithic burials in the Cis-Baikal. The biconical bone point (the
shigir-type point) has distant analogues with the Early Holocene sites of the North Eastern
Europe, Mid-Urals and the Neolithic-Chalcolithic period in the Western Siberia. The 14С date
5470±80 BP (Ki–16434) for the Zhigalovo burial points out to its forming during the socalled
«hiatus» in the Neolithic cultures of the Cis-Baikal that is marked with the penetration
of the new people with new cultural traditions. In this context and by several facts the Zhigalovo
burial can be considered as the reflection of some distant connections.
Key words: burial, Upper Lena river, Cis-Baikal, Shigir point, Neolithic «hiatus», distant
cultural connections.
airport Zhigalovo territory (Upper Lena river). The analysis and the comparison of funeral,
burial grounds peculiarities in the Neolithic-Bronze Age of the Cis-Baikal were held judging
by stable signs of funeral traditions. By these revealed particularities the Zhigalovo burial slightly differs from other Neolithic burials in the Cis-Baikal. The biconical bone point (the
shigir-type point) has distant analogues with the Early Holocene sites of the North Eastern
Europe, Mid-Urals and the Neolithic-Chalcolithic period in the Western Siberia. The 14С date
5470±80 BP (Ki–16434) for the Zhigalovo burial points out to its forming during the socalled
«hiatus» in the Neolithic cultures of the Cis-Baikal that is marked with the penetration
of the new people with new cultural traditions. In this context and by several facts the Zhigalovo
burial can be considered as the reflection of some distant connections.
Key words: burial, Upper Lena river, Cis-Baikal, Shigir point, Neolithic «hiatus», distant
cultural connections.
Research Interests:
We consider the development problem of notion «Mesolithic» and the formation of the Mesolithic branch in the Russian archaeological research. We have identified the general dynamical transformation in the scientific rationality... more
We consider the development problem of notion «Mesolithic» and the formation
of the Mesolithic branch in the Russian archaeological research. We have identified the
general dynamical transformation in the scientific rationality (evolutionism, neoevolutionism).
Searching of identification essence of the notion «Mesolithic» comes in two
seemingly different research approaches that are identified as stadial concept and concretehistorical
approach in the Russian historiographical practice, and we have defined it as research
traditions. Every tradition of research is associated with specific Mesolithic mythologeme.
In evolutionary – stadial concept, Mesolithic is identified with the microlitization
as geometric microliths; in neo-evolutionism – concrete-historical concept, the main
feature is the changing of hunting objects and the emergence of fishing as the adaptation
forms to abrupt climate changes at the boundary of the Pleistocene-Holocene. Neoevolutionary
concept recognizes the role of migration factors and the presence of a temporal
differentiation in the development of Mesolithic cultures. Comparative analysis showed
that the content and features of the Mesolithic in different research traditions are almost
identical, and it is only reflected axiological shift of significance of certain signs to identify
the nature of the Mesolithic.
Keywords: Mesolithic, traditions research, evolutionism, neo-evolutionism, stadializm
specifically historical approach.
of the Mesolithic branch in the Russian archaeological research. We have identified the
general dynamical transformation in the scientific rationality (evolutionism, neoevolutionism).
Searching of identification essence of the notion «Mesolithic» comes in two
seemingly different research approaches that are identified as stadial concept and concretehistorical
approach in the Russian historiographical practice, and we have defined it as research
traditions. Every tradition of research is associated with specific Mesolithic mythologeme.
In evolutionary – stadial concept, Mesolithic is identified with the microlitization
as geometric microliths; in neo-evolutionism – concrete-historical concept, the main
feature is the changing of hunting objects and the emergence of fishing as the adaptation
forms to abrupt climate changes at the boundary of the Pleistocene-Holocene. Neoevolutionary
concept recognizes the role of migration factors and the presence of a temporal
differentiation in the development of Mesolithic cultures. Comparative analysis showed
that the content and features of the Mesolithic in different research traditions are almost
identical, and it is only reflected axiological shift of significance of certain signs to identify
the nature of the Mesolithic.
Keywords: Mesolithic, traditions research, evolutionism, neo-evolutionism, stadializm
specifically historical approach.
Research Interests:
This article explores the presence of cultural lacunae (featuring little to no objects) or discontinuities during the final period of Paleolithic and Neolithic Baikalian Siberia. We compare two models for the development of archaeological... more
This article explores the presence of cultural lacunae (featuring little to no objects)
or discontinuities during the final period of Paleolithic and Neolithic Baikalian Siberia.
We compare two models for the development of archaeological cultures from this period
and discuss the causes of archaeological “discontinuities”. We conclude that these discontinuities
represent unusual natural and socio-cultural situations and require deeper
research.
Key words: archaeological break (discontinuity), modeling, final period of the Paleolithic,
Neolithic, Baikal Siberia.
or discontinuities during the final period of Paleolithic and Neolithic Baikalian Siberia.
We compare two models for the development of archaeological cultures from this period
and discuss the causes of archaeological “discontinuities”. We conclude that these discontinuities
represent unusual natural and socio-cultural situations and require deeper
research.
Key words: archaeological break (discontinuity), modeling, final period of the Paleolithic,
Neolithic, Baikal Siberia.