Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

    Eugene Schupp

    Seed selection, removal and subsequent management by granivorous animals is thought to be a complex interaction of factors including qualities of the seeds themselves (e.g., seed size, nutritional quality) and features of the local... more
    Seed selection, removal and subsequent management by granivorous animals is thought to be a complex interaction of factors including qualities of the seeds themselves (e.g., seed size, nutritional quality) and features of the local habitat (e.g. perceived predator risk). At the same time, differential seed selection and dispersal is thought to have profound effects on seed fate and potentially vegetation dynamics. In a feeding arena, we tested whether rodent species, seed species, and indirect and direct predation cues influence seed selection and handling behaviors (e.g., scatter hoarding versus larder hoarding) of two heteromyid rodents, Ord's kangaroo rat ( Dipodomys ordii) and the Great Basin pocket mouse ( Perognathus parvus). The indirect cue was shrub cover, a feature of the environment. Direct cues, presented individually, were (1) control, (2) coyote ( Canis latrans) vocalization, (3) coyote scent, (4) red fox ( Vulpes vulpes) scent, or (5) short-eared owl ( Asio flammeus) vocalization. We offered seeds of three sizes: two native grasses, Indian ricegrass ( Achnatherum hymenoides) and bluebunch wheatgrass ( Pseudoroegneria spicata), and the non-native cereal rye ( Secale cereale), each in separate trays. Kangaroo rats preferentially harvested Indian ricegrass while pocket mice predominately harvested Indian ricegrass and cereal rye. Pocket mice were more likely to scatter hoard preferred seeds, whereas kangaroo rats mostly consumed and/or larder hoarded preferred seeds. No predator cue significantly affected seed preferences. However, both species altered seed handling behavior in response to direct predation cues by leaving more seeds available in the seed pool, though they responded to different predator cues. If these results translate to natural dynamics on the landscape, the two rodents are expected to have different impacts on seed survival and plant recruitment via their different seed selection and seed handling behaviors.
    Invasion of grasslands and shrublands by piñon-juni- per woodlands is driven by seed dispersal and seedling establish- ment at woodland ecotones, yet we know little about these pro- cesses. We present a preliminary overview of tree seed... more
    Invasion of grasslands and shrublands by piñon-juni- per woodlands is driven by seed dispersal and seedling establish- ment at woodland ecotones, yet we know little about these pro- cesses. We present a preliminary overview of tree seed dispersal and seedling recruitment at ecotones. Dispersal out of woodlands depends on the type of seed disperser and their habitat use, movement patterns,
    In this paper we analyze the seed dispersal stage of the Prunus mahaleb-frugivorous bird inter- action from fruit removal through seed delivery within the context of disperser effectiveness. The effectiveness of a frugivorous species as a... more
    In this paper we analyze the seed dispersal stage of the Prunus mahaleb-frugivorous bird inter- action from fruit removal through seed delivery within the context of disperser effectiveness. The effectiveness of a frugivorous species as a seed disperser is the contribution it makes to plant fitness. Effectiveness depends on the quantity of seed dispersed (''quantity component'') and the quality of
    A plausible explanation for how rapid migrations were achieved can guide forecasts for tree populations in the twenty-first century
    Page 1. THE BOTANICAL REVIEW VOL. 65 JANUARY-MARCH 1999 NO. 1 Seed and Seedling Ecology of Pifion and Juniper Species in the Pygmy Woodlands of Western North America JEANNE C. CHAMBERS USDAForestService ...
    We evaluated the balance between positive and negative effects of environmental conditions on first-year seedling survival of the tree Cercocarpus ledifolius during two summers, 1996 and 1997. The experimental design was fully crossed... more
    We evaluated the balance between positive and negative effects of environmental conditions on first-year seedling survival of the tree Cercocarpus ledifolius during two summers, 1996 and 1997. The experimental design was fully crossed with two levels of water, with and without supplementation, two levels of herbivory, with and without protection, and three major microhabitats, open interspaces, under the canopy of Artemisia tridentata shrubs, and under the canopy of mature C. ledifolius trees. Effects of drought and herbivory on seedling survival depended on the year. Water supplementation and herbivory protection during the dry summer of 1996 (27.7 mm) generally increased seedling survival. Additionally, survival tended to be greatest beneath C. ledifolius canopies. More important ecologically were the significant interactions. In 1996, water supplementation increased survival more with than without herbivory protection. The three-way interaction, treatment-microhabitat combination, was most important; by far the greatest survival was in the water supplementation and herbivory protection in the tree microhabitat. During the wet summer of 1997 (158.5 mm), neither water supplementation, herbivory protection, nor microhabitat were significant as main effects. The water-supplemented and herbivory-protected treatment again combined to yield highest survival, but this time in open interspaces rather than beneath trees. Our study shows how the importance of individual limiting factors and the relative favorableness of particular microhabitats appear to change across years depending on environmental conditions.
    Page 1. ORIGINAL PAPER Effects of resource availability and propagule supply on native species recruitment in sagebrush ecosystems invaded by Bromus tectorum Mónica B. Mazzola • Jeanne C. Chambers • Robert R. Blank ...