HISTORY
Post-British Occupation
Egypt and Its Interactions
with Türkiye*
Halİm GençoĞlu**
Assoc. Prof. Dr.
University of Cape Town
**After his undergraduate studies in Izmir, Halim Gençoğlu completed his master’s degree in
religious studies at the University of Cape Town (UCT). His thesis focused on the religious activities of the Ottoman Islamic scholar Abu Bakr Effendi in South Africa in the nineteenth century,
using South African, Ottoman, and other archival sources. He then enrolled for his PhD in Hebrew studies on “Socio-political Challenges of “Marginal” Religious Denominations: The Sabetai
Sect as a Case Study.” He analyzed a controversial figure in history, the self-proclaimed Messiah,
the Jewish Rabbi Shabbetai Tzvi. During his academic studies, he also conducted research on
broader South African themes using both South African and Ottoman archival sources. During his archival research, he discovered that Dr. Muhammed Shukri Effendi was the first black
medical student to graduate from UCT. This discovery was published on the UCT website on
April 12, 2016. (http://www.health.uct.ac.za/news/new-evidencefirst-black-medical-doctors-uct-south-african-history) More recently, he discovered that the Bo-Kaap museum at 71 Wale
Street actually belonged to the Ottoman Turkish religious scholar Mahmud Fakih Effendi. He is
currently a Research Fellow in the Department of African Studies at the UCT, where he conducts
research in African studies.
E mail: halim.gencoglu@wits.ac.za
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4743-1698
Received: 9.1.2024
Accepted: 1.2.2024
*The text was written by Halim Gençoglu in Turkish and English.
How to cite: Gençoğlu, H. (2024). Post-British Occupation Egypt and Its Interactions with
Türkiye. BRIQ Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi Dergisi, 5(2), 218-223.
HISTORY
RÖPORTAJ
ABSTRACT
This paper explores the post-British occupation period in Egypt, focusing on its diplomatic and political
relations with Türkiye during the early years of its establishment. Following the end of British occupation
in 1952, Egypt entered a phase of significant political and social transformation under the leadership of
figures such as Gamal Abdel Nasser. During this period, Egypt sought to redefine its foreign policy and
establish new alliances. The paper delves into the evolving relations between Egypt and Türkiye, two nations
with rich historical ties dating back to the Ottoman era. It analyses the diplomatic exchanges, treaties,
and collaborative efforts that characterized their interactions in the aftermath of British withdrawal. The
study considers the geopolitical context, regional challenges, and shared aspirations that influenced the
trajectory of Egypt- Türkiye relations. Key themes include the impact of pan-Arabism and pan-Islamism
on diplomatic discourse, the pursuit of mutual economic interests, and the geopolitical considerations that
shaped the two nations' foreign policies. The paper also investigates the cultural and societal dimensions
of their relations, exploring how shared historical and cultural affinities influenced public perceptions and
bilateral engagements. Drawing on archival documents, diplomatic correspondences, and historical records,
this research sheds light on the intricacies of Egypt's post-occupation foreign policy and its establishment-era
relations with Türkiye. By examining the political, economic, and cultural dimensions of this relationship,
the paper contributes to a nuanced understanding of the complex dynamics that defined the geopolitical
landscape of the Eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East during this critical period.
Keywords: British Egypt, Egypt, independence of Egypt, Ottoman Egypt, Türkiye-Egypt.
AFTER DECADES OF BRITISH OCCUPATION,
reservations. This move marked the beginning
Egypt embarked on a transformative journey
of a transitional phase in which Egyptians
towards national sovereignty in the late 19th
aspired to shape their political destiny. The
and early 20th centuries. The aftermath of Bri-
early post-occupation period witnessed the
tish rule left an indelible mark on Egypt’s po-
establishment of a constitutional monarchy
litical, social, and economic landscape, laying
under the rule of King Fuad I. However, this
the groundwork for a period of self-determi-
era was characterized by political instability,
nation. The British occupation that began in
economic challenges, and growing discontent
1882 profoundly influenced the country’s po-
with the monarchy. In 1952, a military coup
litical dynamics. In the wake of the occupati-
led by General Muhammad Naguib and later
on, however, Egypt sought to establish a more
supported by Colonel Gamal Abdel Nasser,
independent political system. In 1922, the
resulted in the overthrow of the monarchy,
United Kingdom unilaterally eventually decla-
marking a significant turning point in Egypt’s
red Egypt’s independence, albeit with certain
history (Stolz, 2018: 213).
219
HISTORY
RÖPORTAJ
In 1925, while Türkiye was dealing with revolutions and rebellions, it did not forget its Egyptian brothers and a sports competition
was organized to support them against the British domination in the region. Despite those painful years, Egyptian artists visited
Türkiye due to sincere relations.
Cumhurbaşkanlığı Devlet Arşivi (CDA), 180. 09\3.19.1, 1925.
Nasser’s Rise and Pan-Arabism
Colonel Nasser’s ascent to power marked a shift
towards a more assertive and nationalist Egypt.
Nasser pursued policies aimed at modernizing
the country, redistributing land, and reducing
220
foreign influence. His vision extended beyond
Egypt, advocating for the idea of Pan-Arabism,
which aimed to unite Arab nations. The nationalization of the Suez Canal in 1956 further strengthened Egypt’s pursuit of economic independence
and sovereignty (Mestyan, 2017: 16).
HISTORY
RÖPORTAJ
The 1956 Suez Crisis was a turning point
in Egypt’s post-British occupation era. Nasser’s decision to nationalize the Suez Canal
led to military intervention by the United
Kingdom, France, and Israel. However, international pressure, particularly from the
United States and the Soviet Union, forced
the invading forces to withdraw. The Suez
Crisis showcased Egypt’s ability to defend
its sovereignty on the global stage.
Land reforms were
initiated to reduce
wealth concentration
and redistribute land to
peasants.
After the British occupation, Egypt witnessed significant social and economic
changes. Land reforms were initiated to reduce wealth concentration and redistribute
land to peasants. Industrialization efforts
aimed to modernize the economy, but challenges persisted. This period of rapid population growth also brought about social and
economic challenges that required innovative solutions. Therefore, one could argue
that the post-British occupation era laid the
foundation for modern Egypt. Nasser’s charismatic leadership and advocacy of Arab
nationalism continue to have an impact,
despite difficulties and criticism. Subsequent leaders built upon the developments of
this era, shaping Egypt into the dynamic
and complex nation it is today (Febe, 2011:
65).
The Twilight of Ottoman Rule in Egypt:
A Look at the Later Years
The final years of Ottoman rule in Egypt, spanning
from the late 19th century to the early 20th century, were marked by a complex interplay of political, social, and economic changes. As the Ottoman
Empire grappled with challenges, both internal
and external, Egypt found itself at the center of a
transformative period that would shape its destiny
for the decades to come.
In the late 19th century, the Ottoman Empire
struggled with a series of internal reforms known
as the Tanzimat, aimed at modernizing administrative and legal systems. However, these reforms
proved insufficient to address the deep-rooted issues within the empire, leading to a period of decline and instability.
Egypt, a pivotal province of the Ottoman Empire, also faced unique challenges during this time.
This era witnessed the rise of nationalist sentiments
and calls for greater autonomy. Charismatic leaders like Egyptian nationalist and military officer
Ahmed Urabi played a significant role in shaping
the political landscape. The Urabi Revolt of 18811882 marked a turning point in Egyptian history.
Fueled by grievances against foreign influence and
economic troubles, Urabi led a nationalist uprising
against the Ottoman-appointed khedive in power.
The revolt ultimately resulted in direct British intervention, ostensibly to safeguard their financial
interests in the Suez Canal (Alan, 2013: 38).
In 1882, British forces occupied Egypt, effectively ending Ottoman rule in the region. While
Egypt nominally remained a part of the Ottoman
Empire, it came under British protection in practice. The Ottoman Sultan retained his formal title as
ruler, but British influence prevailed, particularly
in economic and military matters.
221
HISTORY
RÖPORTAJ
The Turkish announcer described this match as follows: The game could not rise above the average. There are very few admirable elements
in the Turkish game. If the Turks faced any Dutch team, they would most likely be defeated. While talking about the second half, which started
with four goals scored by the Egyptians, the informant mentions that there was a remarkable movement among the public; The audience,
which was initially limited to 2000, has now reached 5000. Aladdin scored a goal and saved the honor of the Turks. The Egyptians played
football the English way, and the Turks played their games slowly. The Turkish team's reserves did so little work that there was no harm in
leaving them in Istanbul.
Cumhurbaşkanlığı Devlet Arşivi (CDA), 180. 09\3.19.1, 1925.
The formal ties between Egypt and the Ottoman Empire were severed during World War
I when Egypt came under British protectorate following the Ottoman Empire’s alignment
with the Central Powers in 1914. The remnants
of Ottoman rule disappeared, and the Ottoman Sultanate was abolished in 1922. At this
point, one should note that the final years of
Ottoman rule in Egypt left a lasting impact on
the country’s psyche. The experience of foreign
occupation, nationalist uprisings, and ultimately transitioning to British influence paved the
way for Egypt’s pursuit of independence and
sovereignty in the ensuing decades (Nomani,
2020: 43).
222
Türkiye-Egypt Relations during the Nasser Era
The Nasser era in Egypt, spanning from the early
1950s to the mid-1960s, was a period of dynamic
changes in geopolitics and regional alliances. During
this time, Türkiye-Egypt relations underwent a
complex evolution shaped by political ideologies,
regional dynamics, and charismatic leaders like Gamal
Abdel Nasser. Following World War II, both Türkiye
and Egypt found themselves amidst a changing
international landscape. Initially, relations between
the two countries were characterized by cautious
cooperation driven by shared desires for regional
stability and economic development. However, with
Nasser’s rise to power in Egypt, differences in political
HISTORY
RÖPORTAJ
ideologies began to influence the course of TürkiyeEgypt relations (Gençoğlu, 2017: 18).
The Pan-Arabism vision emphasized by Gamal Abdel Nasser, highlighting Arab unity and independence,
played a significant role in shaping Egypt’s foreign policy. This ideology, combined with Nasser’s charismatic
leadership, aimed to unite Arab nations against colonial
influences and establish a more assertive regional identity. As a result, Egypt’s diplomatic priorities evolved and
affected its relationships with countries like Türkiye.
In the early years of Nasser’s rule, Türkiye was a
member of the Baghdad Pact, a defense alliance established in 1955 to counter perceived Soviet influence
in the Middle East. Criticizing Western-led alliances,
Nasser distanced Egypt from the agreement. Türkiye, committed to maintaining a balance between the
East and the West, faced challenges fulfilling alliance
commitments while addressing the evolving dynamics in the region. The 1956 Suez Crisis further strained
Türkiye-Egypt relations. Nasser’s nationalization of the
Suez Canal led to military intervention by Israel, the
United Kingdom, and France. Despite being a NATO
member, Türkiye expressed concerns about the use of
force and maintained a distance from the intervention.
This divergence in foreign policy approaches between Türkiye and Egypt marked a critical period in regional diplomacy. Following the Suez Crisis, both Türkiye and Egypt recognized the importance of regional
stability. The weakening of the Baghdad Pact and the
emergence of the short-lived United Arab Republic
(UAR) between Egypt and Syria prompted Türkiye to
reevaluate its approach. In the early 1960s, there were
efforts to improve diplomatic ties, as Türkiye expressed
its willingness for dialogue and cooperation.
Therefore, it is possible to argue that the Nasser era
left a lasting impact on Türkiye -Egypt relations. While political differences existed during this period, the
evolving dynamics laid the groundwork for future interactions. In the subsequent years, changes in alliances
and diplomatic initiatives reflected the complex nature
of regional relations (Toprak, 2012: 223-237). In the final analysis, the Nasser era marked a challenging yet
transformative period in Türkiye-Egypt relations. Both
countries grappled with the complexities of regional
politics, realizing the importance of preserving stability in the Middle East while contending with ideological differences. The legacy of this period continues to
shape the diplomatic landscape, shedding light on the
intricate dance of geopolitics in the region (Gençoğlu,
2020: 14).
To conclude, Egypt’s journey following the British
occupation was defined by political transitions, economic reforms, and the quest for a national identity. The
post-occupation era laid the groundwork for Egypt’s
pursuit of independence and sovereignty, ultimately
shaping the nation’s trajectory in the subsequent years.
The legacy of leaders like Nasser continues to influence
Egypt’s political landscape, reflecting the enduring impact of this transformative era in the country’s history.
Meanwhile, the twilight of Ottoman rule in Egypt witnessed a complex interplay of political turmoil, nationalist aspirations, and foreign intervention. While the
Ottoman Empire grappled with internal challenges,
Egypt emerged as a focal point of change, ushering in
a new era dominated by British influence. This period
laid the foundation for Egypt’s 20th-century quest for
self-determination and independence.
References
Alan, M. (2013). Nature and Empire in Ottoman Egypt: An Environmental History. 1st
pbk. ed. Cambridge England: Cambridge University Press.
Febe, A. (2011). Coptic Christianity in Ottoman Egypt, New York: Oxford University
Press.
Gençoğlu, H. (2017). Ottoman Traces in Southern Afrika the Impact of Eminent Turkish
Emissaries, Libra yay. Istanbul.
Gençoğlu, H. (2020). Türk Arşiv Kaynaklarında Türkiye - Afrika = Türkiye - Africa in the
Turkish Archival Sources., 1. baskı ed. İstanbul: SR Yayınevi.
Mestyaan, A. (2017). Arab Patriotism : The Ideology and Culture of Power in Late Ottoman Egypt, Princeton New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Nomani, S. (2020). Turkey Egypt and Syria : A Travelogue (version First edition). First ed.
Syracuse New York: Syracuse University Press.Stolz, D., A. (2018). The Lighthouse
and the Observatory : Islam Science and Empire in Late Ottoman Egypt.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Toprak, S. (2012). Osmanlı Yönetiminde Kuzey Afrika: Garp Ocakları. Journal of Turkology. https://doi.org/10.18345/tm.02790.
223