International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics
Volume 118 No. 18 2018, 4209-4215
ISSN: 1311-8080 (printed version); ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-line version)
url: http://www.ijpam.eu
Special Issue
Progressive Failure Analysis of a Tapered
Thick Composite Plate
1
Edwin Sudhagar P, 2Vasudevan R, 3Ananda Babu A, 4Paul Praveen
5
A, Arun Tom Mathew
1,4,5
School of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of
Technology(VIT), Vellore, India
2
Center for Innovative Manufacturing Research, Vellore Institute of
Technology (VIT), Vellore, India
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharda University, Greater
Noida, India, 201 306.
Abstract
This study investigates the progressive failure analysis of a tapered thick composite plate. The
governing differential equation of motion of the various tapered configurations of a thickness tapered
reinforced composite plate are presented in the finite element method using first order shear
deformation theory. The failure analysis is carried out by considering the fact that the crack exits
parallel to the fibers when the ply fails and the cracked ply is being replaced by a hypothetical ply that
has no transverse stiffness, transverse tensile strength and shear strength. However, the longitudinal
modulus and strength is considered to remain unchanged. First the local stress and strains in each
ply is found out under various loading conditions. Then by employing the ply-by-ply stresses and
strains in failure theories, the strength ratio is calculated. Multiplying the strength ratio to the applied
load yields the load level of the failure of the first ply. Once the first ply failure load is evaluated, the
stiffness of the damaged ply or plies is degraded and the actual load level of the previous failure is
considered in further calculation. The strength ratios of the remaining undamaged plies are evaluated
at each level of loadings. Thus the degraded stiffness of the tapered composite plate from first ply
failure to last ply failure under various loading condition are investigated.
Key Words— Tapered laminated composite thick plate, Vibration, Finite Element Method.
1.INTRODUCTION
High strength to density ratio of composite materials makes them more desirable materials over
the conventional materials for structural applications. Composite structures are widely subjected to a
various loading conditions during their service life. It is very important to understand the response of
those structures for various loading conditions to exploit their full strength. As the composite laminate
consists of number of lamina stacked together at various orientations or ply angles, understanding
the failure response of a composite laminate is a pre-requisite for understanding the failure response
of a composite structure [1]. Failure of a composite structure can be explained in various ways such
as first ply failure (FPF), last ply failure (LPF) and progressive ply failure (PPF). The first ply failure
occurs when the failure initiates in a single layer in a laminate in either the fiber direction or in the
direction perpendicular to the fibers. Last ply failure occurs after the structure has degraded to the
point where it is no longer capable of carrying additional load and most of the plies fail progressively
[2].
4209
ijpam.eu
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics
Special Issue
Tolson and Zabaras [1] developed a numerical model and investigated experimentally to predict the
first-fly failure and last-ply failure using progressive stiffness reduction technique. Reddy et al. [2]
developed a progressive failure algorithm using generalized layer-wise plate theory to predict the
first-ply and ultimate failure load of a uniform composite laminate and suggested a new stiffness
reduction technique for the failed element. Cheung et al. [3] used the higher-order shear deformation
theory and Lee‘s strength criterion coupled with finite strip method to investigate the progressive
failure analysis of anisotropic composite plates. The effects of fiber orientation and the number of
plies on the load carrying capacity were also investigated. Tay and Lim [4] analyzed the stiffness-loss
of uniform composite laminates with general balanced lay-up sequences and containing distributed
transverse cracks. It was shown that the constitutive theory of damage applicable for a cross-ply
laminate could be extended to the general ply-lay-ups using finite element formulation. Padhi et al. [5]
studied theoretically and experimentally the non-linear behavior, first-ply failure and ultimate collapse
of laminated composite plates with clamped edges subjected to transverse pressure. Sun et al. [6]
examined the progressive failure of delaminated composite plates using the Reissner-Mindlin plate
theory and the Von Karman‘s non-linear plate theory and concluded that the delamination growth is
significantly affected by the boundary condition and the stiffness degradation plays an important role
in the strength analysis of delaminated plate. Knight et al. [7] studied the progressive failure analysis
of composite structures using structural analysis of general shells (STAGS) and demonstrated the
capability of the STAGS to analyze the progressive damage. Bulent and Karakuzu [8] investigated
the failure load, the failure mode, and the propagation of failure of composite plate with different fiber
orientation, different material properties and different geometries under pin-loaded conditions.
Watkins et al. [9] investigated experimentally the delamination in composite beams using fiber optic
sensor and neural network algorithm. The finite element formulation of the uniform composite beam
was developed using classical beam theory to validate the results obtained experimentally. Chen et
al. [10] studied the dynamic response and the progressive failure of the delaminated uniform
composite plates using the first-order shear deformation theory. They investigated the effects of
frequency of dynamic load, delamination length and location, and reduction of structure stiffness
during the progressive failure.
Ganesan and Liu [11] developed non-linear finite element formulation based on first order shear
deformation theory and investigated the first-ply failure load, the ultimate failure load, the buckling
load, the maximum transverse displacements, and locations and modes of failure of tapered
laminated plates under the action of uni-axial compression. The design optimization of composite
structures to yield the optimal natural frequencies and damping factor is becoming an important
aspects of research. Nagaraj and Vasudevan [12] presented the review of recent development in
progressive failure analysis for various structural elements such as beams, plates, panels and shells
in laminated composites. Even though few works have been focused on the the static and dynamic
properties of uniform and tapered composite beam structures, the progressive failure analysis of a
tapered composite plate under various loading conditions including in-plane and out-of-plane loading
conditions is yet to be investigated. In this present study, the progressive failure analysis of the
various configurations of tapered thick composite plates with ply drop-off is being sought to find the
first ply failure and last ply failure using the finite element formulation developed. Furthermore, as the
progressive failure analysis is the framework that accounts for the continuous stiffness degradation of
materials and indicates the decrease in load carrying capacity and localization of the stress, the
failure analysis of the structure would provide an idea to understand from the first-ply failure to lastply failure.
2.NUMERICAL
MODELLING
COMPOSITE PLATE
OF
A
TAPERED
A tapered composite plate is considered for the development of the finite element model. These
taper structures are formed by dropping off plies internally and are denoted as taper configuration 1
(TS1), Taper configuration 2 (TS2) and Taper Configuration 3 (TS3) as shown in figure 1. In figure
4210
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics
Special Issue
1, ‗d‘ represent the number of domains along the longitudinal directions and the left end thickness as
HL and HR as the right end thickness and Length ‗L‘ and breadth ‗B‘ are considered as the planar
dimensions. The first order shear deformation theory (FSDT) is used to model the layers of a
composite plate into an equivalent single layer.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 1. Representation of various tapered
configurations
(a) Tapered Configuration 1 (TS1) (b) Tapered
Configuration 2 (TS2) and (c) Tapered Configuration 3
(TS3).
The strain energy of the tapered composite plate is expressed as:
2
2
u u
u
u
v
v
u0
1 1 LB
0 0 A 0 0 A
0A
0
2A
A
16 x y
66 y
16 x
x 12 y
2 2 0 0 11 x
v
u
u u
v
v v
u
u
0A
0 0 A
0A
0 0 A
0A
0
0 A
26 y y 26 y
66 x x 16 x
66 y
y 12 x
2
u
v0
y
y
0
x
x
A
B
B
B
B
26 y
12 y
16 x
22 y
x 11 x
v v
u0 v0
y
y
2A
0 0
x B
x B
B
B
66 y
26 y
66 x
26 y x
y
x 16 x
2 v
v
y
y
x B
x B
A 0 0 B
B
66 x
26 y
22 y
26 x
y 12 x
u
u
v
v w
kA kA
0 B
0 B
0 B
0
x B
16 y
12 y
16 x y 44 y
45 x
x 11 x
u
u
v
v
y
0 B
0 B
0 B
0
x
B
y
66 y
26 y
66 x
x 16 x
u
u
v
v
w
y
0 B
0 B
0 B
0
B
kA kA55 x
26 y
22 y
26 x
x 45 y
y 12 x
2
2
w
w
w
w w
w
kA
kA kA
kA 2kA
44 y
45 x y
55 x
55 x
x 45 y
2
2
w
w
x
x
x D
x 2D
D
kA
kA
45 x
11 x
16 x y
66 y
y 44 y
y
y
y
x
x
x
D
D
2D
2D
16 x y 12 x
26 y
x 12 y
U
y
y
x
kA 2 2 D
2kA D
55 x
66 y x
45 x y
22 y
2
y
y
y
kA 2 dx dy
D
2D
26 x y
66 x
44 y
(1)
2
where L and B are the length and breadth of the plate in x and y directions of the tapered
composite plate. The strain energy equation is substituted in Lagrange‘s equation to formulate the
governing equation of motion in finite element form.
4211
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics
Special Issue
A rectangular element with four nodes and with one node in each corner is considered for the
development of finite element of the tapered composite plate. Each node contains five degrees of
freedom (DOF) which includes um, vm, wm, Ψx and Ψy. The governing equations of motion for the
tapered composite plate in the finite element form can then be obtained as:
(2)
[k e ]{d } { f e }
where [k ] is the element stiffness matrices and d um , vm , wm , x , y
e
T is the displacement vector at
each node and f e is the element force vector.
PROGRESSIVE FAILURE ANALYSIS AND ITS ITERATIVE PROCEDURE
The progressive failure analysis is carried out by considering the fact that the crack exists parallel
to the fibers when a ply fails. However, this ply is still capable of taking load parallel to the fibers.
Figure. 2 Typical Progressive failure procedure
Hence the cracked ply is being replaced by a hypothetical ply that has no transverse stiffness,
transverse tensile strength, and shear strength. However, the longitudinal modulus and strength is
considered to remain unchanged. To investigate the ply failure, the local stresses and strains in each
ply is found first out under the loading conditions considered. Then by employing the ply-by-ply
stresses and strains in failure theories, the strength ratio is calculated. Multiplying the strength ratio to
the applied load gives the load level of the failure of the first ply. Once the first ply failure load is
evaluated, the stiffness of the damaged ply or plies is degraded and the actual load level of the
previous failure is considered for further calculation. The strength ratios of the remaining undamaged
plies are evaluated at each level of loadings. The procedure is repeated until all the plies in the
laminate have failed. The procedure has been briefed as shown in Figure 2.
3.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
The numerical simulation on tapered composite plates is performed by considering a Glass-Epoxy
laminated composite plate of length (L) 300 mm, breadth (B) 300 mm and 12 ply‘s and each ply
thickness of a lamina as 0.19 mm. The tapered composite plates are investigated by considering
o
o
various taper configurations with ply orientations [0 /90 ]6s at thick section of the tapered composite
plates. at the ply orientation at the thin end of the various tapered configurations are TS1, TS2 and
0
0
0
0
0
TS3 are [0 /90 ]3s, [0 /90 ]3s and [0 ]6s.The simulated results in terms of the the first ply failure load
and the progressive ply failure and the corresponding ply orientation are presented in Table 1 for the
various tapered configurations. It can be seen that the failure varies for the various tapered
configuration. It is due to the fact that the stiffness of the tapered configuration varies according to the
ply drop off and the resin location. It can also be seen that the load at which the unidirectional plies
fail is much higher than the angle plies. This can also be related to the fact that the unidirectional
4212
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics
Special Issue
plies provide higher stiffness compared to the angle ply. Further, the order of the ply failure differs
with various tapered configurations. Hence, it can be concluded that the progressive failure analysis
provides the designer few important guidelines on selection of proper tapered configurations and the
ply orientation and their angle.
Table 1. Progressive failure analysis for taper
configurations TS1, TS2 and TS3 composite plates.
5.CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, the first-ply and progressive failure analysis of the configuration of the tapered
composite plate are investigated. It was demonstrated that the load carrying capacity of the structure
depends on the ply orientation and the taper configuration. It can be seen that the ply orientations
plays an important role in load carrying capacity in the structure. The fundamental work for the
progressive failure analysis has been carried out using the presented finite element analysis and the
results were presented on the failure load, order of the ply failure and its corresponding ply angle.
This study provides the important guidelines for the designers to consider the tapered configuration
for their applications.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Authors are grateful to VIT University for providing vibration Laboratory to carry out this work.
REFERENCES
[1] S. Tolson and N. Zabaras, 1991, ―Finite element analysis of
progressive failure in laminated composite plates,‖ Computers &
Structures, Vol. 38, pp. 361-376.
[2] Y. S. N. Reddy, C. M. Dakshina Moorthy and J. N. Reddy, 1995,
―Non-linear progressive failure analysis of laminated composite
plates,‖ International Journal of non-linear mechanics,Vol.30, pp.
629-649.
[3] M.S.Cheung, G.Akhras and W.Li, 1995, ―Progressive failure analysis
of composite plates by the finite strip method,‖ Computer methods in
applied mechanics and engineering, Vol. 124, pp. 49-61.
4213
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics
[4] T. E. Tay and E. H. Lim, 1996, ―Analysis of composite laminates with
transverse cracks,‖ Composite Structures Vol. 34, pp. 419-426.
[5] G.S. Padhi, R.A.Shenoi, S.S.J.Moy and G.L.Hawkins, 1998,
―Progressive failure and ultimate collapse of laminated composite
plates in bending,‖ Composite structures, Vol. 40, pp. 271-291.
[6] X.Sun, L.Tong and H.Chen, 2001, ―Progressive Failure Analysis of
Laminated Plates with Delamination,‖ Journal of Reinforced Plastics
and Composites, Vol. 20, pp.1370-1389.
[7] N.F. Knight Jr, C.C. Rankin, F.A. Brogan, 2002, ―STAGS
computational procedure for progressive failure analysis of
laminated composite structures,‖ International Journal of Non-Linear
Mechanics, Vol. 37, pp. 833–849.
[8] Bulent M.I. and R. Karakuzu, 2002, ―Progressive failure analysis of
pin-loaded carbon–epoxy woven composite plates,‖ Vol. 62,
pp.1259-1271.
[9] S. E. Watkins, G.W. Sanders, F.Akhavan and K. Chandrashekhara,
2002, ―Modal analysis using fiber optic sensors and neural networks
for prediction of composite beam delamination,‖ Smart materials and
structures, Vol. 11, 489.
[10] H.Chen, M.Hong and Y.Liu, 2004, ―Dynamic behavior of delaminated
plates considering progressive failure process,‖ Composite
Structures, Vol. 66, pp. 459–466.
[11] R.Ganesan and D. Y. Liu, 2008, ―Progressive failure and postbuckling response of tapered composite plates under uni-axial
compression,‖ Composite Structures, Vol. 82, pp.159–176.
[12] Nagaraj Murugesan and Vasudevan Rajamohan, 2016, ―Prediction
of Progressive Ply Failure of Laminated Composite Structures: A
Review,‖ Arch Computat Methods Eng.
4214
Special Issue
4215
4216