!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
Gay Gene!
If there is one, is it the last frontier to be
crossed by homosexual to find their
complete access to every sphere of society?!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!
Luis Alexandre Ribeiro Branco
Truth and Action
Lisbon, September, 2014
Copyright © 2014 Luis Alexandre Ribeiro Branco
All rights reserved.
!
!!
ISBN-13: 978-1502552280
ISBN-10: 1502552280
No part of this book or any of its contents may be reproduced,
copied, modified or adapted, without the prior written consent of
the author.
!
!
!
!
!!
Publisher: Truth and Practice
Author: Luis Alexandre Ribeiro Branco
Lisbon, September, 2014
wwww.truthandpractice.wordpress.com
Email: contato@verdadenapratica.com
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
Philosophy | Apologetic
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!
DEDICATION
!
I dedicate this work to my beloved family that has
supported me in the most difficult parts of my life.
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!
Introduction
!!
When we think about postmodernism we have
to consider its implication in every aspect of
society and none would doubt that
homosexuality is one of these major
implication especially for the contemporary
church. The influence of relativism and the
paradigm shift in humanity made
homosexuality not just acceptable, but in
many cases a norm.
!
For a long time the church barricaded
herself not only behind her Jewish-christian
worldview and theological values, but also
behind the absolutes of science that just has
to agree that in the beginning there were only
male and female. For long time homosexuality
has been viewed as a behavior option, but
what about if science has come up with a new
discovery so called Gay Gene? That is exactly
what we want to discuss in this essay.
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Índice
Introduction
5
In the beginning
9
Friendship and homosexuality
11
The search for the gay gene
14
The discovery impact on theology
16
The influence of original sin in the human gene
19
A Christian response to homosexuals
22
Conclusion
27
Autor
33
Bibliography
35
!
"9
In the beginning
!
The issue involving homosexuality might be
one of the most challenging events for the
contemporary church. Homosexuals are no
longer satisfied in finding their civil rights
assured, but they want to move forward into
the various sphere of society invading into
every aspects of life not just fighting for their
rights, but fighting to demoralize and destroy
any other worldview that differ from them
creating a society oriented and guided by a
noisy and quarrelsomeness minority.
!
Since the earliest light of civilization and
human communities of which we possess any
historical record it is possible to observe and
assume the homosexual presence throughout
history. In some civilizations homosexuality
was viewed as innate, while in other with
resistance, the truth is that since the outset of
history this practice has traditionally been a
reality. Nevertheless this practice was never
"10
acceptable by the church, as we can read in
Romans 1:24-27:
!
“Therefore God gave them over in the
sinful desires of their hearts to sexual
impurity for the degrading of their
b o d i e s w i t h o n e a n o t h e r. T h e y
exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and
worshiped and served created things
rather than the Creator--who is forever
praised. Amen. Because of this, God
gave them over to shameful lusts. Even
their women exchanged natural relations
for unnatural ones. In the same way the
men also abandoned natural relations
with women and were inflamed with lust
f o r o n e a n o t h e r. M e n c o m m i t t e d
indecent acts with other men, and
received in themselves the due penalty
for their perversion.”
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
"11
Friendship and homosexuality
!
The Church was born in the Jewish cradle and
have developed the culture we now call the
Judeo-Christian culture it was expected that
Christians continue to respect and obey most
of the moral and ethical mosaic pattern in
those days. Homosexuals tries to speculate
into the Bible stories to make the assumption
of homosexual behavior between the Bible
characters, as they do, for example in the
case of the friendship of David and Jonathan,
using the following verses:
!
“After David had finished talking with
Saul, Jonathan became one in spirit
with David, and he loved him as
himself.” (1 Samuel 18:1)
!
!
“I grieve for you, Jonathan my brother;
you were very dear to me. Your love for
me was wonderful, more wonderful than
that of women.” (2 Samuel 1:26)
The renowned Christian philosopher C.
S. Lewis wrote beautifully in this regard of the
same gender friendship: “To say ‘These are
"12
my friends’ implies ‘Those are not’. For all
reasons if a man believes (as I do) that the
old estimate of Friendship was correct one, he
hardly write a chapter on it except as a
rehabilitation.
This imposes on me at the outset
a very tiresome bit of demolition. It has
actually became necessary in our time
to rebut the theory that every firm and
serious friendship is really homosexual.
The dangerous word really is here
important. To say that every Friendship
is consciously and explicitly homosexual
would be too obviously false; the
wiseacres take refuge in the less
palpable charge that it is really unconsciously, cryptically, in some
Pickwickian sense - homosexual. And
this, through it cannot be proved, can
never of course be refuted. The fact
that no positive evidence of
homosexuality can be discovered in the
behavior of two Friends does not
disconcert the wiseacres at all: ‘That’,
they say gravely, ‘is just what we
should expect.´ The very lack of
evidence is this treated as evidence; the
absence of smoke proves that the fire is
very carefully hidden. Yes - if it exist at
all. Bur we must first prove its
existence. Otherwise we are arguing
like a man who should say ´If there
were an invisible cat in that chair, the
"13
!
chair would look empty, but the chair
does look empty; therefore there is an
invisible cat in it.’
A belief in invisible cats cannot
perhaps be logically disproved, but it
tells us a good deal about those who
hold it. Those who cannot conceive
Friendship as a substantive love but
only as a disguise or elaboration of Eros
betray the fact that they have never
had a Friend.”1
Assume, therefore, that the close relationship
of David and Jonathan was a homosexual
relationship jeopardize any same gender
relationship in our contemporary world. What
would be merely an absurd.
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
1 C S. Lewis, The Four Loves (London:
!
Collins, 2012), 72-73.
"14
The search for the gay gene
!
Dean H. Hamer and Peter Copeland presents
an interesting study on the search for what
some homosexuals would view as the final
frontier of the debate on homosexuality, the
existence of a homosexual's gay gene, which
presumably would require the society as a
whole to look at homosexuality as a biological
fact and common in the lives of some humans.
!
According to the authors, over several
years of research there was just a small, but
significant difference between the brains of
homosexual and heterosexual. The survey also
demonstrated that identical twins have a high
probability of being both homosexual, which
somehow suggests that there is a chance of
homosexuality being at least in part
hereditary.2 In 1991, Dr. Dean Hamer, one
2 Dean H. Hamer and Peter Copeland, The
!
Science of Desire: The Search for the Gay Gene and
the Biology of Behavior (New York: Simon &
Schuster, 1994), 21.
"15
renowned geneticist, graduated at the famous
Harvard Medical School, initiated a research
filed as PROTOCOL # 92-C-0078, when he
started his search for the possible existence of
a gay gene. After years of research and
millions of dollars in investment, Hamer finally
published his research finding, along with an
elite formed by major researchers in the area,
which had identified the gay gene, but that it
had not yet been isolated,
which would take
several years of research to do so.
The discovery by researchers from
Harvard opened a window unimaginable in
science and the last frontier had at last been
sighted, and at once it ceased to be a matter
of XX and XY chromosomes. In fact the
biological race continues, this time calling for a
larger number of researchers from other
fields, such as psychiatry, the search for more
concrete and satisfactory answers.
!
!
"16
The discovery impact on theology
!
The earnestness of the matter also came to
contemporary writers of systematic theology,
such as the famous "Theology of Lordship"3 by
John M. Frame, in its third volume, "The
Doctrine of the Christian Life” Frame
addresses the issue acknowledging the
existence of the abnormal chromosome XYY in
a large proportion of young people who is
responsible for their anti-social behavior, and
even criminal acts in people with this type of
chromosome.4
A little further neuroscientist Simon
LeVay published an article about the difference
in hypothalamic structure between
3 John M. Frame, The Doctrine of the
!
Christian Life, Theology of Lordship (Phillipsburg,
N.J.: P & R Pub., ©2008)
!
4
Ibid. 261.
"17
homosexual and heterosexual men,5 in which
he confirms and explains the existence of a
minute deviation in the size of the "INAH-3",
but of great significance in the brains of
heterosexual and homosexual men. INAH-3 is
the short form for the third interstitial nucleus
of the anterior hypothalamus, and is the
sexually dimorphic nucleus of humans. The
INAH-3 is much bigger in males than in
females irrespective of age. Homologues of
the INAH-3 have been discovered taking a
direct role in sexual behavior in rhesus
monkeys, sheep, and rats. This breakthrough
has led many scientists to deduce that there is
a possibility of homosexuality being a natural
tendency of the individual rather than a simple
behavioral choice.
!
Now the church has to deal with
something that goes beyond theories, but deal
with a scientific issue. I still believe that the
5 L e Va y S ( 1 9 9 1 ) . A d i f f e r e n c e i n
!
hypothalamic structure between homosexual and
heterosexual men. Science, 253, 1034–1037.
"18
church has enough biblical arguments to
refute homosexual activity and label it as a
sinful action against nature and God. John M.
Frame, however, says that a “homosexual
genetic predisposition does not eliminate the
fundamental element of choice.” 6 The
conclusion of John M. Frame is based on the
fact that people born with a hereditary
predisposition to other trends such as
alcoholism, choose healthy behavior and
resistance to their natural tendencies.
!
!
6
Ibid. 264.
"19
The influence of original sin in the
human gene
We have to take in account as well the impact
of original sin into the man entire being. In
theology we would call it total total depravity.
John Piper explains this doctrine as following:
“When we speak of man's depravity we mean
man's natural condition apart from any grace
exerted by God to restrain or transform man.”7
Charles Hodge in his Systematic Theology
provides a more detailed description of this
problem:
!
“This universal depravity of men is no
slight evil. The whole human race, by
their apostasy from God, are totally
depraved. By total depravity, is not
meant that all men are equally wicked;
nor that any man is as thoroughly
corrupt as it is possible for a man to be;
nor that men are destitute of all moral
virtues. The Scriptures recognize the
fact, which experience abundantly
7 John Piper, “Total Depravity,” Monergism,
!
http://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/articles/
piper/depravity.html (accessed September 24, 2014).
"20
confirms, that men, to a greater or less
degree, are honest in dealings, kind in
their feelings, and beneficent in their
conduct. Even the heathen, the Apostle
teaches us, do by nature the things of
the law. They are more or less under
the dominion of conscience, which
approves or disapproves their moral
conduct. All this is perfectly consistent
with the Scriptural doctrine of total
depravity, which includes the entire
absence of holiness; the want of due
apprehensions of the divine perfections,
and of our relation to God as our
C r e a t o r, P r e s e r v e r, B e n e f a c t o r,
Governor, and Redeemer. There is
common to all men a total alienation of
the soul from God so that no
unrenewed man either understands or
seeks after God; no such man ever
makes God his portion, or God’s glory
the end of his being. The apostasy from
God is total or complete. All men
worship and serve the creature rather
than, and more than the Creator. They
are all therefore declared in Scripture to
be spiritually dead. They are destitute
of any principle of spiritual life. The
dreadful extent and depth of this
corruption of our nature are proved,
1. By its fruits; by the fearful
prevalence of the sins of the flesh, of
sins of violence, of the sins of the heart,
as pride, envy, and malice; of the sins
of the tongue, as slander and deceit; of
the sins of irreligion, of ingratitude,
"21
!
profanity, and blasphemy; which have
marked the whole history of our race,
and which still distinguish the state of
the whole world.”8
My understanding is that even if we
recognize any sort of Gay Gene, if it is real,
we have to realize as well that the effects of
sin wasn’t restricted to the spiritual life of
man, but it had an effect over whole nature,
therefore a chromosome XYY found in human
with natural disfunction or misbehavior is a
direct effect of sin in the human being. Of
course it will not sound good to the ears of the
homosexual militants, but it is what it is. What
we cannot accept is that a chromosome XYY
influences certain men to do evil, but in
homosexual it influences for good.
8 Charles Hodge, Systematic Theology
!
(Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1999),
2:181-83.
"22
A Christian response to homosexuals
!
However, William J. Webb, a professor of
theology at Heritage Seminary, Ontario wrote
a fabulous book called "Slaves, Women &
Homosexuals: Exploring the Hermeneutics of
Cultural Analysis”9 where he explains that “in
a pluralistic society such as we live today,
Christians must defend the rights and freedom
of homosexuals and not impose the Christian
ideal of sexuality on others.”10 Rather, the
Church must establish a redemptive stance in
its praxis, which implies that we must love
homosexuals as we love ourselves.
!
This entails that we must treat them
with the same kind of grace, respect, care and
compassion with which we expect to be
treated. This implies that even though we do
9 William J. Webb, Slaves, Women and
!
Homosexuals: Exploring the Hermeneutics of
Cultural Analysis (Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity
Press, ©2001).
!
10
Ibid. “368,” Kindle.
"23
not agree with the sexual ethics and attitude
of certain people, we still and respect them,
seeking to persuade them to rethink about
their sexual ethics and so seek a divine
transformation in their lives. As John M. Frame
makes clear: "I believe that God can
transform the lives of homosexuals.”11
!
Even that some people opt to live in
their own way apart from God we should not
look for their failure as human beings, neither
should we deprive them of their civil rights. I
can understand exactly how hard it can be for
Christians not only to understand, but also to
accept the civil rights of a certain group that
decided to live contrary to the Scripture. I see
no other means of dealing with this problem,
but developing within the church a redemptive
hermeneutic and theology.
!
Bishop McLaughlin, a minister and a
father of a homosexual wrote un interesting
!
11
Ibid. 265.
"24
book, not academical, but something deep
from his heart as a father of the strangles that
homosexual people have to deal with, in which
he says:
!
“If the murderer is caught, convicted in
court AND sentenced; then he is
punished and serves his time. The same
thing holds true of a child molester,
rapist, bank robber and everything else
illegal.
When these criminals serve their
time; they are released and live normal
lives. Most are not harassed after they
get out and they can do just about
anything that they want to do. With the
exception of child sex offenders; nobody
ever knows who they are. They get out
of prison, move to another city, get a
job and start completely new lives.
However; for a gay person they
are punished every day of their lives.
The gay person doesn’t have to be
caught and they certainly don’t get a
trial. They don’t even serve a limited
number of years of punishment. (There
are minimum and maximum sentences
for crimes but these don’t apply to gay
people.)
The gay is shunned and has their
rights restricted their entire life and
never has the right to a jury trial or to
present their side of the argument …
"25
!
Every year 4,000 - 6,000 kids are
successful in their suicide attempts.
They think that as many as 400,000
may make attempts every year but
fail.”12
Nevertheless, even though that homosexual
face daily struggles, specially the young ones,
the LGTB groups (LGBT is an initialism that
stands for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and
transgender) will resist any kind of
transformation program or counseling offered
by the church. In some countries, they have
been filing cases against psychologists,
pastors and churches that provide any kind of
transformation to homosexuals. If for one side
the homosexuals groups have been charging
the Church for closing her eyes towards the
scientific developments regard to
homosexuality, they must be held responsible
for closing their eyes towards history, science
12 Bishop McLaughlin, Gay in America:
!
Punishment 24/7 Without a Trial (United States of
America: Amazon Digital Services, Inc., 2012), 6, 13,
Kindle.
"26
and human rights. If a person is trying to get
help, we must help!
!
!
"27
Conclusion
!
The reality is that genetic mutations or the
ever-existing reality of a gay gene do not alter
the fact that God created man and woman
with their particular anatomies,
complementarity and the biblical ethics of
sexuality does not change. What changes have
taken place since then? Changes the reaction
of the Church towards
the manner in which
Christians should look at homosexuals.
!
This fresh approach must be with love,
concern, mercy, grace, and include them in
their agenda in the quest for a more just
society, recognizing that many of these are
dealing with issues beyond the limits of choice
even it is not eliminate though, in their daily
lives and like any human being wish to live in
peace in a just and egalitarian society.
The Church must realize as well that an
egalitarian society cannot deny its basic right
"28
to any specific group. We may begin to ask
the questions in order to find a solution to
homosexual civil rights, such as the civil
union, child adoption, pension and right to the
partner inheritance, and so on. This paper
cannot provide an answer to all these
subjects, but can challenge the Church along
with the society to find a plausible solution or
at least acceptable to all parties.
Nevertheless, there is an important
issue and I would risk saying to be the most
important thing above all, which is God's love.
What would happen even to the most holy
man on earth without the love of God? He
would perish because it is God's love, grace
and mercy that save us from spiritual
condemnation. John M. Frame puts it in this
way:
!
“For these reasons, pedagogical and
substantive, I prefer to begin with the
ethical attributes, or, as I call them, the
attributes of divine goodness. Scripture,
as we have seen, never suggest that
"29
!
God’s eternity or aseity is more
fundamental to his nature than his love
or justice. Indeed, those passages of
Scripture that sounds most like
definition of God tend to focus on his
attributes of goodness, not his
attributes of knowledge or power.”13
As we have addressed in this essay on
homosexuality have been present in human
history for a long time and it will not walk
away and even countries with rigorous law
against homosexuality have not been able to
vanish it completely from their midst. We have
seen also that science points to new
directions, these different directions do not
contradict the Scripture at all, but simply
reinforce the idea of the total depravity or
pervasive depravity. As a result of the Fall of
Man, every person born into the world is
enslaved to the service of sin and, apart from
the efficacious or prevenient grace of God. Sin
has affected human beings as a whole,
13 John M. Frame, The Doctrine of God, A
!
Theology of Lordship (Phillipsburg, N.J.: P&R Pub.,
2002), 392.
"30
including his biological system. Otherwise
death would not subsist. Therefore, it is not
surprising at all if science shows that traces of
sin can be discovered in the human biological
system.
I am certain that the word sin will still
be annoying to some after we have taken the
standard of recognize the advancement of
science and the possibility of the gay gene.
However, it is not up to the scholar to change
the biblical view of homosexuality, but to find
a way to apply it after all this new science
development. The idea of post modernity will
be to force the biblical scholars to embrace
science, to set down the differences, and to
accept homosexuality as a natural process of
human life and that we should accommodate
this new reality. As biblical scholars, we do
recognize the new reality with the ancient
reality, pervasive depravity. Nothing changes
in the Scripture, but we do know that there
must be a change in our behavior towards
homosexuality, understanding that it is still a
matter of choice, but not only a matter of
"31
choice, and that we need to help, accept, love
and encourage those who look to the church in
a search for Christ even with their homosexual
tendencies knowing that Christ has all the
power to transform them as he did with each
one of us.
There are thousand and millions of
homosexuals needing to be loved, accepted,
and encouraged. Many of those have been
rejected by families, friends and communities
due to their life style. We cannot ignore this
reality as we face the new challenges of
evangelism and missions in the post modern
era. These teens are not only dealing with a
decision that they should make towards
Christ, but they have their whole biological
system, the world mindset, passions and
desires fighting against them, trying to keep
them away from the love of Christ.
It would be a presumption from my side
trying to provide a final view and answers in
this matter, perhaps we have more questions
"32
than answers, but it is a very good beginning.
We need some how to provide a response to
the challenge of homosexuality and the
science related to it without fear and without
holding upon our shoulder the responsibility to
answer all the questions, I think that it is okay
to leave some unanswered, but we need to
move forward in this matter. I believe that the
issue related to homosexuality is one of the
main agenda of the post modern society, from
what we cannot scape.
God is interested in this subject, I say
this because God is interested in justice,
therefore we may count with his marvelous
wisdom.
"33
Autor
!
Luis Ribeiro Alexander Branco, was born in the
city of Petrópolis, RJ, Brazil. He is married, a
father, a poet and a clergyman. He has a
Degree in Biblical Studies and Theology, a
Master Degree in Church Administration and
Leadership, a Doctor Degree in Ministry and is
actually pursuing a Doctorate in Philosophy, he
is a member of the Society of Christian
Philosophers, member of the Sociedade
Brasileira dos Poetas Aldravianistas, member
of the Movimiento Poetas Del Mundo, member
of the União Brasileira de Escritores and
member of Academia de Letras e Artes
Lusófonas, he is affiliated with the Mission
Board of the National Baptist Convention,
having served in several countries gave him
the prerogative of a major cross-cultural
experience; His theology is reformed, as a
poet, he has a melancholy style.
"34
He is a humanist characterized by the
idea that man gets his true essence in the
knowledge of God. His work is composed of
serving as a resident pastor, a scholar in
seminary and writing articles and volumes on
several subjects. He lives in Lisbon with his
folk and have published books on spirituality,
theology, philosophy and anthologies.
!!
"35
Bibliography
!
Frame, John M. The Doctrine of God. A
Theology of Lordship. Phillipsburg, N.J.: P&R
Pub., 2002.
!
________. The Doctrine of the Christian Life.
Theology of Lordship. Phillipsburg, N.J.: P
andamp; R Pub., ©2008.
!
Hamer, Dean H., and Peter Copeland. The
Science of Desire: The Search for the Gay
Gene and the Biology of Behavior. New York:
Simon andamp; Schuster, 1994.
!
Hodge, Charles. Systematic Theology. Vol. 2.
Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1999.
!
Lewis, C S. The Four Loves. London: Collins,
2012.
!
McLaughlin, Bishop. Gay in America:
Punishment 24/7 Without a Trial. United
States of America: Amazon Digital Services,
Inc., 2012. Kindle.
!
Piper, John. "Total Depravity." Monergism.
http://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/
articles/piper/depravity.html (accessed
September 24, 2014).
!
Webb, William J. Slaves, Women. Downers
Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2001. Kindle.
!
"36
________. Slaves, Women and Homosexuals:
Exploring the Hermeneutics of Cultural
Analysis. Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity
Press, ©2001.
!