Chain tabdee (disparagement) is utilized to wrongly label Muslims as Kharijites Online polemicist, Bro Hajji (Muhammad Naheem Safdar) has made a number of videos rebutting the daw’ah of the Madakhila specifically their erroneous labelling of scholars, du’aat and lay Muslims as being “kharijites”. In response to his efforts one of his readers compiled this list of Q & A’s with text and links. This will be shared online in order to combat the “PDF thunder-storm” that Madkhali affiliates (i.e. SPUBS /TROID) use to drown out all other voices. https://www.youtube.com/cha nnel/UCxsGPkAwK3IySXO WXimsDeg https://www.facebook.com/m ohammadnaheemsafdar123 Falsely labelling Muslims as being kharijites is endemic online and this document is an effort to combat this scourge. Erroneous tabdee’ (disparagement) causes division, can be sinful and also harms Muslims i.e. puts them under the spotlight of security services / agencies. As such, download and disseminate this text at will! It is time that we challenged the chain tabdee’ extremists and their narrative! Make du’a for the compiler of this text who wishes to remain anonymous. Disseminated with the permission of the compiler and Bro Hajji. Question & Answer Format Q. Is there a difference of opinion regarding khuruuj (rebellion against a leader)? Q. Can an oppressor be a rightful leader? Q. Did Al-Husain, Ibn Zubayr, the scholars of Madina and the scholars of Iraq rebel? Q. Is khuruuj better than patience? Q: Can someone who rebelled against a leader be a martyr (shaheed)? Q: Did Zayd ibn Ali revolt? (the great-grandson of Ali ibn Abu Taalib)? Q: Did Al Hassan ibn Salih rebel? Q: Did Saeed bn Jubayr rebel? Q: Did they do it out of a religious conviction? Q. Is there a difference between the Khawaarij and Bughat (rebels)? 1 Q: Is everyone who rebels from the Khawaarij? Q. Is there a difference between the rebels and people of Bid`ah (innovation)? Q. Can we take their testimony? Q. Is khuruuj against an unjust leader an issue of aqeedah or fiqh? Q. Is ijtihad allowed in the issue of khuruuj? Q. Did the Salaf call for khuruuj? Q. Does calling for khuruuj make you a mubtadi (an innovator)? Q. How many of the Salaf rebelled? Q. Was it a small group? Q. Were they knowledgeable? Q. Did Ibn Umar regret not doing khuruuj against Hajjaj? Q. Can we advise or rebuke the leader in public? Q. Did the Salaf abuse the leader in public? Q. Can we pray behind an oppressive leader? Q. Did Al-Hassan and Al-Husain abuse Marwaan in public? Q. Is there Ijma`(consensus) on the impermissibility of khuruuj? ___________________________________________________________________ Q. Is there a difference of opinion regarding khuruuj (rebellion against a leader)? Q. Can an oppressor be rightful leader? Source: ‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺬﻛﺎﺭ‬ ) ‫ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺮ‬368 - 463 = ‫ ﻫـ‬978 - 1071(‫ﻡ‬ T1: “And for his statement DO NOT STRUGGLE POWER FROM ITS RIGHTFUL OWNERS (THE LEADERS). The people DIFFERED on that. Some say that the RIGHTFUL OWNERS are people of justice, goodness, gracefulness, piety and the power to exercise all these. These are the people you do NOT struggle power with. As for the people of oppression, sinfulness and oppression these people do NOT have a right to leadership. Their evidence is the statement of Allah to Ibrahim:“[ Allah ] said, "Indeed, I will make you a leader for the people." [Abraham] said, "And of my descendants?" [ Allah ] said, "My covenant does NOT include the wrongdoers." ‫ﻭَﺃَﻣَّﺎ ﻗَﻮْﻟُﻪُ ﺃَﻻَّ ﻧُﻨَﺎﺯِﻉَ ﺍﻷَْﻣْﺮَ ﺃَﻫْﻠَﻪُ ﻓَﻘَﺪِ ﺍﺧْﺘَﻠَﻒَ ﺍﻟﻨَّﺎﺱُ ﻓِﻲ ﺫَﻟِﻚَ ﻓَﻘَﺎﻝَ ﺍﻟْﻘَﺎﺋِﻠُﻮﻥَ ﻣِﻨْﻬُﻢْ ﺃَﻫْﻠُﻪُ ﺃَﻫْﻞُ ﺍﻟْﻌَﺪْﻝِ ﻭَﺍﻹِْﺣْﺴَﺎﻥِ ﻭَﺍﻟْﻔَﻀْﻞِ ﻭَﺍﻟﺪِّﻳﻦِ ﻣَﻊَ ﺍﻟْﻘُﻮَّﺓِ ﻋَﻠَﻰ‬ ُ‫ﺍﻟْﻘِﻴَﺎﻡِ ﺑِﺬَﻟِﻚَ ﻓَﻬَﺆُﻻَﺀِ ﻻَ ﻳُﻨَﺎﺯَﻋُﻮﻥَ ﻷَِﻧَّﻬُﻢْ ﺃَﻫْﻠُﻪُ ﻭَﺃَﻣَّﺎ ﺃَﻫْﻞُ ﺍﻟْﺠَﻮْﺭِ ﻭَﺍﻟْﻔِﺴْﻖِ ﻭَﺍﻟﻈُّﻠْﻢِ ﻓَﻠَﻴْﺴُﻮﺍ ﺑِﺄَﻫْﻞٍ ﻟَﻪ‬ َ‫ﻭَﺍﺣْﺘَﺠُّﻮﺍ ﺑِﻘَﻮْﻝِ ﺍﻟﻠَّﻪِ ﻋَﺰَّ ﻭَﺟَﻞَّ ﻹِﺑْﺮَﺍﻫِﻴﻢ‬ 2 (َ‫ﺍﻟْﺒَﻘَﺮَﺓِ )ﺇِﻧِّﻲ ﺟَﺎﻋِﻠُﻚَ ﻟِﻠﻨَّﺎﺱِ ﺇِﻣَﺎﻣًﺎ ﻗَﺎﻝَ ﻭَﻣِﻦْ ﺫُﺭِّﻳَّﺘِﻲ ﻗَﺎﻝَ ﻻَ ﻳَﻨَﺎﻝُ ﻋَﻬْﺪَﻱِ ﺍﻟﻈَّﺎﻟِﻤِﻴﻦ‬124 https://al-maktaba.org/book/1722/1895#p2 ________________________________________________________________________________ Q. Did Al-Husain rebel? Q. Did Ibn Zubayr rebel? Q. Did the scholars of Madina and Iraq rebel? Q. Did the Salaf as salih rebel? Q. Is khuruuj better than patience? Source: ‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺬﻛﺎﺭ‬ ) ‫ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺮ‬368 - 463 = ‫ ﻫـ‬978 - 1071(‫ﻡ‬ T: A group of the Salaf-us-Salih (pious predecessors) went with this stance and some honourable people followed them including the Quran reciters and scholars from the people of Madina and Iraq. For the same reason, Ibn Zubayr and Al-Husain rebelled against Yazid. The best of the people of Iraq rebelled, along with their scholars, against Al-Hajjaj. The people of Madina rebelled against the Banu Umayyads. Using this and similar statements like it a group among the Mutazilah (extreme rationalists) also go with this view. It is also the view of the Khawaarij. But as for Ahlu Aunna wal Jama’h (i.e. the people of the Sunnah) and their scholars, they say the leader MUST be gracious, knowledgeable, just and have a strong personality. If this is NOT possible it is BETTER to obey the unjust leader than to rebel against him because rebellion replaces security with fear. It causes bloodshed…..these (calamities) are greater than being patient with the oppressor. ِ‫ﺫَﻫَﺐَ ﺇِﻟَﻰ ﻫَﺬَﺍ ﻃَﺎﺋِﻔَﺔٌ ﻣِﻦَ ﺍﻟﺴَّﻠَﻒِ ﺍﻟﺼَّﺎﻟِﺢِ ﻭَﺍﺗَّﺒَﻌَﻬُﻢْ ﺑِﺬَﻟِﻚَ ﺧَﻠَﻒٌ ﻣِﻦَ ﺍﻟْﻔُﻀَﻼَﺀِ ﻭَﺍﻟْﻘُﺮَّﺍﺀِ ﻭَﺍﻟْﻌُﻠَﻤَﺎﺀِ ﻣِﻦْ ﺃَﻫْﻞِ ﺍﻟْﻤَﺪِﻳﻨَﺔِ ﻭَﺍﻟْﻌِﺮَﺍﻕ‬ ْ‫ﻭَﺑِﻬَﺬَﺍ ﺧﺮﺝ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺰُّﺑَﻴْﺮِ ﻭَﺍﻟْﺤُﺴَﻴْﻦُ ﻋَﻠَﻰ ﻳَﺰِﻳﺪَ ﻭَﺧَﺮَﺝَ ﺧِﻴَﺎﺭُ ﺃَﻫْﻞِ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍﻕ ﻭﻋﻠﻤﺎﺋﻬﻢ ﻋَﻠَﻰ ﺍﻟْﺤَﺠَّﺎﺝِ ﻭَﻟِﻬَﺬَﺍ ﺃَﺧْﺮَﺝَ ﺃَﻫْﻞُ ﺍﻟْﻤَﺪِﻳﻨَﺔِ ﺑَﻨِﻲ ﺃُﻣَﻴَّﺔَ ﻋَﻨْﻬُﻢ‬ ُ‫ﻭَﻗَﺎﻣُﻮﺍ ﻋَﻠَﻴْﻬِﻢْ ﻓَﻜَﺎﻧَﺖِ ﺍﻟْﺤَﺮَّﺓ‬ ِ‫ﻭَﺑِﻬَﺬِﻩِ ﺍﻟﻠَّﻔْﻈَﺔِ ﻭَﻣَﺎ ﻛَﺎﻥَ ﻣِﺜْﻠَﻬَﺎ ﻓِﻲ ﻣَﻌْﻨَﺎﻫَﺎ ﻣَﺬْﻫَﺐٌ ﺗَﻌَﻠَّﻘَﺖْ ﺑِﻪِ ﻃَﺎﺋِﻔَﺔٌ ﻣِﻦَ ﺍﻟْﻤُﻌْﺘَﺰِﻟَﺔِ ﻭَﻫُﻮَ ﻣَﺬْﻫَﺐُ ﺟَﻤَﺎﻋَﺔِ ﺍﻟْﺨَﻮَﺍﺭِﺝ‬ ‫ﻭَﺃَﻣَّﺎ ﺟَﻤَﺎﻋَﺔُ ﺃَﻫْﻞِ ﺍﻟﺴُّﻨَّﺔِ ﻭَﺃَﺋِﻤَّﺘُﻬُﻢْ ﻓَﻘَﺎﻟُﻮﺍ ﻫَﺬَﺍ ﻫُﻮَ ﺍﻻِﺧْﺘِﻴَﺎﺭُ ﺃَﻥْ ﻳَﻜُﻮﻥَ ﺍﻹِْﻣَﺎﻡُ ﻓَﺎﺿِﻼً ﻋَﺎﻟِﻤًﺎ ﻋَﺪْﻻً ﻣُﺤْﺴِﻨًﺎ ﻗَﻮِﻳًّﺎ ﻋَﻠَﻰ ﺍﻟْﻘِﻴَﺎﻡِ ﻛَﻤَﺎ ﻳَﻠْﺰَﻣُﻪُ ﻓِﻲ‬ ِ‫ﺍﻹِْﻣَﺎﻣَﺔِ ﻓَﺈِﻥْ ﻟَﻢْ ﻳَﻜُﻦْ ﻓَﺎﻟﺼَّﺒْﺮُ ﻋَﻠَﻰ ﻃَﺎﻋَﺔِ ﺍﻹِْﻣَﺎﻡِ ﺍﻟْﺠَﺎﺋِﺮِ ﺃَﻭﻟَﻰ ﻣِﻦَ ﺍﻟْﺨُﺮُﻭﺝِ ﻋَﻠَﻴْﻪِ ﻷَِﻥَّ ﻓِﻲ ﻣُﻨَﺎﺯَﻋَﺘِﻪِ ﻭَﺍﻟْﺨُﺮُﻭﺝِ ﻋَﻠَﻴْﻪِ ﺍﺳْﺘِﺒْﺪَﺍﻝَ ﺍﻷَْﻣْﻦِ ﺑِﺎﻟْﺨَﻮْﻑ‬ ‫ﻭَﺇِﺭَﺍﻗَﺔَ ﺍﻟﺪِّﻣَﺎﺀِ ﻭَﺍﻧْﻄِﻼَﻕَ ﺃَﻳْﺪِﻱ ﺍﻟﺪَّﻫْﻤَﺎﺀِ ﻭَﺗَﺒْﻴِﻴﺖَ ﺍﻟْﻐَﺎﺭَﺍﺕِ ﻋَﻠَﻰ ﺍﻟْﻤُﺴْﻠِﻤِﻴﻦَ ﻭَﺍﻟْﻔَﺴَﺎﺩَ ﻓِﻲ ﺍﻷَْﺭْﺽِ ﻭَﻫَﺬَﺍ ﺃَﻋْﻈَﻢُ ﻣِﻦَ ﺍﻟﺼَّﺒْﺮِ ﻋَﻠَﻰ ﺟَﻮْﺭِ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﺋﺮ‬ https://al-maktaba.org/book/1722/1895#p2 Similar statement exists in tafseer Qurtubii ) ‫ ﺷﻤﺲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ‬،‫ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻃﺒﻲ‬600 - 671 ،‫ﻫـ‬1204 - 1273(‫ﻡ‬.: https://al-maktaba.org/book/31702/585#p1 https://al-maktaba.org/book/31702/586#p1 ________________________________________________________________________________ Q: Can someone who rebelled against a leader be a martyr (shaheed)? Q: Did Zayd ibn Ali revolt (the great-grandson of Ali ibn Abu Taalib)? T1: “Zaid ibn Ali 3 ….. He was very knowledgeable, gracious and amiable. He rebelled which caused him to be martyred.” Source: ‫ﺳﻴﺮ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ‬ ) ‫ ﺷﻤﺲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ‬،‫ﺍﻟﺬَﻫَﺒﻲ‬673 - ‫ ﻫـ‬748 ،‫ﻫـ‬1275 – ‫ﻡ‬1347(‫ﻡ‬ 178 - (‫ ﻕ‬،‫ ﺕ‬،‫ﺯَﻳْﺪُ ﺑﻦُ ﻋَﻠِﻲِّ ﺑﻦِ ﺍﻟﺤُﺴَﻴْﻦِ ﺑﻦِ ﻋَﻠِﻲِّ * )ﺩ‬ ُّ‫ ﺍﻟﻤَﺪَﻧِﻲ‬،ُّ‫ ﺍﻟﻌَﻠَﻮِﻱ‬،ُّ‫ ﺃَﺑُﻮ ﺍﻟﺤُﺴَﻴْﻦِ ﺍﻟﻬَﺎﺷِﻤِﻲ‬،ٍ‫ﺍﺑْﻦِ ﺃَﺑِﻲ ﻃَﺎﻟِﺐ‬. ٍ‫ ﻭَﺣُﺴَﻴْﻦ‬،ٍّ‫ ﻭَﻋَﻠِﻲ‬،َ‫ ﻭَﻋُﻤَﺮ‬،ِ‫ ﻭَﻋَﺒْﺪِ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ‬،ِ‫ ﺃَﺑِﻲ ﺟَﻌْﻔَﺮٍ ﺍﻟﺒَﺎﻗِﺮ‬:‫ﺃَﺧُﻮ‬. ٍ‫ ﺃُﻡُّ ﻭَﻟَﺪ‬:‫ﻭَﺃُﻣُّﻪ‬. ِ‫ ﻭَﻋُﺮْﻭَﺓَ ﺑﻦِ ﺍﻟﺰُّﺑَﻴْﺮ‬،ِ‫ ﻭَﺃَﺧِﻴْﻪِ؛ ﺍﻟﺒَﺎﻗِﺮ‬،َ‫ ﺃَﺑِﻴْﻪِ؛ ﺯَﻳْﻦِ ﺍﻟﻌَﺎﺑِﺪِﻳْﻦ‬:ْ‫ﺭَﻭَﻯ ﻋَﻦ‬. ِ‫ ﻭَﺍﺑْﻦُ ﺃَﺑِﻲ ﺍﻟﺰِّﻧَﺎﺩ‬،ٍ‫ ﻭَﺳَﻌِﻴْﺪُ ﺑﻦُ ﺧُﺜَﻴْﻢ‬،ٍ‫ ﻭَﺍﻟﻤُﻄَّﻠِﺐُ ﺑﻦُ ﺯِﻳَﺎﺩ‬،ٍ‫ ﻭَﻓُﻀَﻴْﻞُ ﺑﻦُ ﻣَﺮْﺯُﻭْﻕ‬،ُ‫ ﻭَﺷُﻌْﺒَﺔ‬،ٍ‫ ﺍﺑْﻦُ ﺃَﺧِﻴْﻪِ؛ ﺟَﻌْﻔَﺮُ ﺑﻦُ ﻣُﺤَﻤَّﺪ‬:ُ‫ﻭَﻋَﻨْﻪ‬. َ‫ ﻓَﺎﺳْﺘُﺸْﻬِﺪ‬،َ‫ ﻭَﺧَﺮَﺝ‬،‫ ﻫَﻔَﺎ‬،ٍ‫ﻭَﻛَﺎﻥَ ﺫَﺍ ﻋِﻠْﻢٍ ﻭَﺟَﻼَﻟَﺔٍ ﻭَﺻَﻼَﺡ‬ https://al-maktaba.org/book/10906/4370#p7 T2: “I say: He rebelled due to an interpretation and was killed as a Martyr...” ً‫ ﻭَﻗُﺘِﻞَ ﺷَﻬِﻴْﺪﺍ‬،ً‫ ﺧَﺮَﺝَ ﻣُﺘَﺄَﻭِّﻻ‬:ُ‫ﻗُﻠْﺖ‬،: https://al-maktaba.org/book/10906/4372#p9 ________________________________________________________________________________ Q: Did Al Hassan ibn Salih rebel? Q: Did Saeed bn Jubayr rebel? Q: Did they do it out of a religious conviction? Source: ‫ﺳﻴﺮ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ‬ . ) ‫ ﺷﻤﺲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ‬،‫ﺍﻟﺬَﻫَﺒﻲ‬673 - ‫ ﻫـ‬748 ،‫ﻫـ‬1275 – ‫ﻡ‬1347(‫ﻡ‬ T: “He said: When you see Al-Hassan ibn Salih it is as if you have seen Sa`eed bn Jubayr. .. I say: They share some similarities which are: they both have knowledge, they both are good worshipers of Allah, they both rebelled (did khuruj) against their oppressive leaders as a religious conviction ” ٍ‫ ﺃَﻭْ ﺷَﺒَّﻬْﺘَﻪ ﺑِﺴَﻌِﻴْﺪِ ﺑﻦِ ﺟُﺒَﻴْﺮ‬،ٍ‫ ﺍﻟَّﺬِﻱ ﻟَﻮْ ﺭَﺃَﻳﺘَﻪ ﺫَﻛﺮﺕَ ﺳَﻌِﻴْﺪَ ﺑﻦَ ﺟُﺒَﻴْﺮ‬،ٍ‫ ﺍﻟﺤَﺴَﻦُ ﺑﻦُ ﺻَﺎﻟِﺢ‬:َ‫ﻗَﺎﻝ‬. ً‫ ﻭَﺍﻟﺨُﺮُﻭْﺝُ ﻋَﻠَﻰ ﺍﻟﻈَّﻠﻤَﺔِ ﺗَﺪَﻳُّﻨﺎ‬،ُ‫ ﻭَﺍﻟﻌِﺒَﺎﺩَﺓ‬،ُ‫ ﻭَﻫُﻮَ ﺍﻟﻌِﻠْﻢ‬،ٌ‫ ﺑَﻴْﻨَﻬﻤَﺎ ﻗَﺪﺭٌ ﻣُﺸْﺘَﺮَﻙ‬:ُ‫ﻗُﻠْﺖ‬ https://al-maktaba.org/book/10906/5250#p11 ________________________________________________________________________________ Q. Is there a difference between the Khawaarij and Bughat (rebels)? Q: Is everyone who rebels from the Khawaarij? T: Our teacher said: The MAJORITY of the scholars differentiate between the Khawaarij and the rebels that make interpretations. This is known with the companions (sahabah), the people of hadith and the Jurists (fuqahaa). ‫ ﻳُﻔَﺮِّﻕُ ﺟُﻤْﻬُﻮﺭُ ﺍﻟْﻌُﻠَﻤَﺎﺀِ ﺑَﻴْﻦَ ﺍﻟﺨﻮﺍﺭﺝ‬:‫ﻗَﺎﻝَ ﺷَﻴْﺨُﻨَﺎ‬5‫ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻐﺎﺓ‬ ِ‫ ﻭَﻋَﻠَﻴْﻪِ ﻋَﺎﻣَّﺔُ ﺃَﻫْﻞِ ﺍﻟْﺤَﺪِﻳﺚِ ﻭَﺍﻟْﻔُﻘَﻬَﺎﺀ‬,ِ‫ ﻭَﻫُﻮَ ﺍﻟْﻤَﻌْﺮُﻭﻑُ ﻋَﻦْ ﺍﻟﺼَّﺤَﺎﺑَﺔ‬,َ‫ﺍﻟْﻤُﺘَﺄَﻭِّﻟِﻴﻦ‬ 4 https://al-maktaba.org/book/12052/4768#p6 https://al-maktaba.org/book/12052/4769#p1 ________________________________________________________________________________ Q. Is there a difference between the rebels and people of Bid`ah (innovation)? Q. Can we take their testimony? Q. Is khuruuj against an unjust leader an issue of aqeedah or fiqh? Q. Is ijtihad allowed in the issue of khuruuj? T1. And their testimony is accepted because they are only mistaken in a subsidiary amongst the subsidiaries of the religion by virtue of their Ijtihad. It is similar to when the jurists disagree upon rulings in Fiqh. So far as they are NOT from the people of Bidah (meaning the khuruuj itself did not make them fall into Bid`ah). Their testimony is accepted just like the upright ones. This is the statement of As-Shafii and we don’t know a differing opinion. Source: ) ‫ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﻴﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﻨﻊ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺳﻲ‬597 - 682 = ‫ ﻫـ‬1200 - 1283(‫ﻡ‬ 4571 - ) [‫ )ﻭَﺗَﺠُﻮﺯُ ﺷَﻬَﺎﺩَﺗُﻬُﻢْ( ﻷﻧَّﻬﻢ ﺃﺧْﻄَﺄُﻭﺍ ﻓﻲ ]ﻓﺮﻉٍ ﻣِﻦ‬:‫ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ‬1) َ‫ ﻓﺄﺷْﺒَﻪَ ﺍﻟﻤُﺠْﺘَﻬِﺪﻳﻦ‬،‫( ﻓُﺮﻭﻉِ ﺍﻹِﺳْﻼﻡِ ﺑﺎﺟْﺘِﻬﺎﺩِﻫﻢ‬2 ‫( ﻣِﻦ ﺍﻟﻔُﻘَﻬﺎﺀِ ﻓﻲ‬ ‫ ﻭﻻ ﻧﻌﻠﻢُ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺧِﻼﻓًﺎ‬،ِّ‫ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﻝُ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ‬.ِ‫ ﻛﺄﻫﻞِ ﺍﻟﻌَﺪْﻝ‬،‫ ﻗُﺒِﻠَﺖْ ﺷَﻬﺎﺩَﺗُﻬﻢ‬،ِ‫ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻟﻢ ﻳﻜُﻮﻧﻮﺍ ﻣِﻦ ﺃﻫﻞِ ﺍﻟﺒِﺪَﻉ‬،ِ‫ﺍﻷﺣْﻜﺎﻡ‬. https://al-maktaba.org/book/33211/13702#p3 T2. The second point is that the issue of khuruuj on an oppressive ruler is a speculative, subsidiary matter that whoever differs on it is NOT sinful. And Ash-Shaafi have two famous opinions on its permissibility. An-Nawawi mentions it is Ar-raudah and in Majmu` of Ash-Sheikh Solaahudeen Alalai. And it is known that if it was unconditionally Haram like drinking alcohol there will be NO two opinions on it. Source: ‫ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺽ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺳﻨﺔ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ‬ ) ‫ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮَﺯِﻳﺮ‬775 - 840 = ‫ ﻫـ‬1373 - 1436(‫ﻡ‬ ) [‫ ﺃﻥّ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺨﺮﻭﺝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺭ ]ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ‬:‫ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺜّﺎﻧﻲ‬3 ,‫( ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻈّﻨﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻋﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻻ ﻳﺄﺛﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ‬ ) ((‫ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﻤﺎ ﻓﻲ ))ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﺿﺔ‬,‫ﻭﻟﻠﺸّﺎﻓﻌﻴّﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻓﺎﻥ‬4 ((((‫ ﻭﻓﻲ ))ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻤﺬﻫﺐ ﻓﻲ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻟﻤﺬﻫﺐ‬,‫( ﻟﻠﻨّﻮﻭﻱ‬ )5 ‫ ﻟﻢ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻟﻬﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ‬,‫ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺃﻥّ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺣﺮﺍﻣﺎً ﻗﻄﻌﺎً ﻛﺸﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺨﻤﺮ‬,‫ ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ‬,‫( ﻟﻠﺸّﻴﺦ ﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﻟﺪّﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﺋﻲ‬ ‫ﻗﻮﻻﻥ‬ https://al-maktaba.org/book/32065/497#p4 ________________________________________________________________________________ Q. Did the Salaf call for khuruuj? Q. Does calling for khuruuj make you a mubtadi (an innovator)? T: Ash-shabii said, O you people of Islam, fight them. And do not feel remorse for fighting them. For by Allah I do not know a more oppressive people than them. And Saeed bn Jubayr said: Fight them with good intention and certainty and do not fear for sin in fighting them…. Source: ‫ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﺮﻱ‬ ) ‫ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ‬،‫ﺍﻟﻄﺒﺮﻱ‬224-310 ، ‫ﻫـ‬839 – 923(‫ﻡ‬. 5 ] ‫ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺒﻲ‬2 ‫ ﻓﻮ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﻗﻮﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺴﻴﻂ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﺃﻋﻤﻞ ﺑﻈﻠﻢ ﻭﻻ‬،‫ ﻳﺎ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻗﺎﺗﻠﻮﻫﻢ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺄﺧﺬﻛﻢ ﺣﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺘﺎﻟﻬﻢ‬: [ ‫ﺃﺟﻮﺭ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﻜﻢ‬. [‫ ﻗﺎﺗﻠﻮﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻮﺭﻫﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﻜﻢ‬،‫ ﻗﺎﺗﻠﻮﻫﻢ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺄﺛﻤﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺘﺎﻟﻬﻢ ﺑﻨﻴﺔ ﻭﻳﻘﻴﻦ‬:‫[ ]ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺟﺒﻴﺮ‬3] ‫ﻭﺗﺠﺒﺮﻫﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺬﻻﻟﻬﻢ‬ ‫ ﻭﺇﻣﺎﺗﺘﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ‬،‫ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻔﺎﺀ‬. https://al-maktaba.org/book/9783/3438#p1 https://al-maktaba.org/book/9783/3439#p1 T: Said bn Abdul Hamiid narrates to me that Maalik bn Anas made a Fatwa (religious verdict) for khuruuj along-side Muhammad. And they told him: we have abu Jaafar’s covenant (bay`a) on our neck. And he said: Your bay`a was forced. Source: ‫ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﺮﻱ‬ ) ‫ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ‬،‫ﺍﻟﻄﺒﺮﻱ‬224-310 ، ‫ﻫـ‬839 – 923(‫ﻡ‬. ‫ ﺃﺧﺒﺮﻧﻲ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ‬:َ‫ ﻗَﺎﻝ‬،‫ ﻭﺣﺪﺛﻨﻲ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺤﻤﻴﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺤﻜﻢ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﻜﻤﻲ ﺃﺧﻮ ﺍﻷﻧﺼﺎﺭ‬:‫ﻗﺎﻝ‬ ‫ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻜﺮﻩ‬،‫ ﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﻌﺘﻢ ﻣﻜﺮﻫﻴﻦ‬:‫ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ‬،‫ ﺇﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺃﻋﻨﺎﻗﻨﺎ ﺑﻴﻌﺔ ﻷﺑﻲ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ‬:‫ ﻭﻗﻴﻞ ﻟﻪ‬،‫ﺑْﻦ ﺃﻧﺲ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺘﻲ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺨﺮﻭﺝ ﻣﻊ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ‬ ‫ ﻭﻟﺰﻡ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺑﻴﺘﻪ‬،‫ﻳﻤﻴﻦ ﻓﺄﺳﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ‬. https://al-maktaba.org/book/9783/4257#p5 ________________________________________________________________________________ Q. How many of the Salaf rebelled? Q. Was it a small group? Q. Were they knowledgeable? T1: Al-Hassan, Saeed ibn Jubair, Ash-shaabii and the rest of the taabeiin used to take the wealth of the oppressors…. And they do NOT see their rulership has being legitimate. They used to take it as a right from the evil people… And they struck the face of Al-Hajjaj with the sword. Four thousand of the reciters rebelled against him (Al-Hajjaj) and they were the best of the taabeein. Source: ‫ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ‬ ) ‫ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ‬،‫ﺍﻟﺠﺼﺎﺹ‬305 - 370 ،‫ﻫـ‬917 - 980(‫ﻡ‬. َ‫ﻭَﻗَﺪْ ﻛَﺎﻥَ ﺍﻟْﺤَﺴَﻦُ ﻭَﺳَﻌِﻴﺪُ ﺑْﻦُ ﺟُﺒَﻴْﺮٍ ﻭَﺍﻟﺸَّﻌْﺒِﻲُّ ﻭَﺳَﺎﺋِﺮُ ﺍﻟﺘَّﺎﺑِﻌِﻴﻦَ ﻳَﺄْﺧُﺬُﻭﻥَ ﺃَﺭْﺯَﺍﻗَﻬُﻢْ ﻣِﻦْ ﺃَﻳْﺪِﻱ ﻫَﺆُﻻَﺀِ ﺍﻟﻈَّﻠَﻤَﺔِ ﻻَ ﻋَﻠَﻰ ﺃَﻧَّﻬُﻢْ ﻛَﺎﻧُﻮﺍ ﻳَﺘَﻮَﻟَّﻮْﻧَﻬُﻢْ ﻭَﻻ‬ َ‫ﻳَﺮَﻭْﻥَ ﺇﻣَﺎﻣَﺘَﻬُﻢْ ﻭَﺇِﻧَّﻤَﺎ ﻛَﺎﻧُﻮﺍ ﻳَﺄْﺧُﺬُﻭﻧَﻬَﺎ ﻋَﻠَﻰ ﺃَﻧَّﻬَﺎ ﺣُﻘُﻮﻕٌ ﻟَﻬُﻢْ ﻓِﻲ ﺃَﻳْﺪِﻱ ﻗَﻮْﻡٍ ﻓَﺠَﺮَﺓٍ ﻭَﻛَﻴْﻒَ ﻳَﻜُﻮﻥُ ﺫَﻟِﻚَ ﻋَﻠَﻰ ﻭَﺟْﻪِ ﻣُﻮَﺍﻻَﺗِﻬِﻢْ ﻭَﻗَﺪْ ﺿَﺮَﺑُﻮﺍ ﻭَﺟْﻪ‬ َ‫ﺍﻟْﺤَﺠَّﺎﺝِ ﺑِﺎﻟﺴَّﻴْﻒِ ﻭَﺧَﺮَﺝَ ﻋَﻠَﻴْﻪِ ﻣِﻦْ ﺍﻟْﻘُﺮَّﺍﺀِ ﺃَﺭْﺑَﻌَﺔُ ﺁﻻَﻑِ ﺭَﺟُﻞٍ ﻫُﻢْ ﺧِﻴَﺎﺭُ ﺍﻟﺘَّﺎﺑِﻌِﻴﻦ‬ T2: Also the statement of Ibn Battol points to the fact khuruuj can be permissible and not permissible according to his understanding, for verily obedience to the oppressive leader is better than khuruuj (rebellion)…. If it was that khuruuj was unconditionally Haram and that obedience was unconditionally compulsory he would NOT have said that : For verily, obedience to the oppressive leader is better than khuruuj (rebellion). Like saying fasting Ramadhan is better than eating in Ramadhan. Source: ‫ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﺻﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﺻﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺳﻨﺔ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ‬ ) ‫ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮَﺯِﻳﺮ‬775 - 840 = ‫ ﻫـ‬1373 - 1436(‫ﻡ‬ ‫ ﻷﻧﻪ‬،‫ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﺪﻝُّ ﺑﻤﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﺨﺮﻭﺝ ﻭﻋﺪﻣﻪ‬،ً‫ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﻘﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ‬ ) ‫ﺇﻥ ﻃﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻐﻠِّﺐ‬1 ،ً‫ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺨﺮﻭﺝ ﺣﺮﺍﻣﺎً ﻗﻄﻌﺎ‬،‫ ﻭﺣﻘﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﺀ‬،‫ ﻟﻤﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺴﻜﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻫﻤﺎﺀ‬،‫( ﺧﻴﺮٌ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺨﺮﻭﺝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ‬ ِ‫ ﺇﻥ ﺻﻮﻡ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﺧﻴﺮٌ ﻣﻦ ﻓِﻄْﺮِﻩ‬:‫ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ‬،‫ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻋﺔ ﺧﻴﺮٌ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺨﺮﻭﺝ‬:‫ ﻟﻢ ﻳﻘﻞ‬،ً‫ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﺟﺒﺔً ﻗﻄﻌﺎ‬ https://al-maktaba.org/book/31857/3009#p6 https://al-maktaba.org/book/31857/3010#p1 ________________________________________________________________________________ 6 Q. Did Ibn Umar regret not doing khuruuj against Hajjaj? T: When Ibn Umar said: I don’t regret anything in this world except three things. 1. … 2…. 3. That I did not fight against the oppressive group which descended on us. That is Al-Hajjaj. Source ‫ﺳﻴﺮ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ‬ ) ‫ ﺷﻤﺲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ‬،‫ﺍﻟﺬَﻫَﺒﻲ‬673 - ‫ ﻫـ‬748 ،‫ﻫـ‬1275 - ‫ﻡ‬1347(‫ﻡ‬ ‫ ﻭَﺃَﻧِّﻲ ﻟَﻢْ ﺃُﻗَﺎﺗِﻞِ ﺍﻟﻔِﺌَﺔَ ﺍﻟﺒَﺎﻏِﻴَﺔَ ﺍﻟَّﺘِﻲ‬،ِ‫ ﻭَﻣُﻜَﺎﺑَﺪَﺓِ ﺍﻟﻠَّﻴْﻞ‬،ِ‫ ﻇَﻤَﺄِ ﺍﻟﻬَﻮَﺍﺟِﺮ‬:ٍ‫ ﻣَﺎ ﺁﺳَﻰ ﻋَﻠَﻰ ﺷَﻲْﺀٍ ﻣِﻦَ ﺍﻟﺪُّﻧْﻴَﺎ ﺇِﻻَّ ﻋَﻠَﻰ ﺛَﻼَﺙ‬:َ‫ ﻗَﺎﻝ‬،َ‫ﻟَﻤَّﺎ ﺍﺣﺘُﻀِﺮَ ﺍﺑْﻦُ ﻋُﻤَﺮ‬ ) َ‫ ﺍﻟﺤَﺠَّﺎﺝ‬:‫ﻳَﻌْﻨِﻲ‬- ‫ﻧَﺰَﻟَﺖْ ﺑِﻨَﺎ‬1( -. https://al-maktaba.org/book/10906/3038#p5 ________________________________________________________________________________ Q. Can we advise or rebuke the leader in public? Q. Did the Salaf abuse the leader in public? Q. Can we pray behind an oppressive leader? Q. Did Al-Hassan and Al-Husein abuse Marwaan in public? T: And in that is the etiquettes of dealing with the leaders and goodness with them is to advise them privately. And taking the information about what people say about them so that … about them. All this is when it is possible to do. If it is not possible to rebuke or advise him privately, then it should be done publicly so that the truth will NOT suffer. Source: ‫ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ‬ ) ‫ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ‬،‫ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ‬631 - 676 ،‫ﻫـ‬1234 -1278(‫ﻡ‬ ِ‫ﻭَﻓِﻴﻪِ ﺍﻷَْﺩَﺏُ ﻣَﻊَ ﺍﻷُْﻣَﺮَﺍﺀِ ﻭَﺍﻟﻠُّﻄْﻒُ ﺑِﻬِﻢْ ﻭَﻭَﻋْﻈُﻬُﻢْ ﺳِﺮًّﺍ ﻭَﺗَﺒْﻠِﻴﻐُﻬُﻢْ ﻣَﺎ ﻳَﻘُﻮﻝُ ﺍﻟﻨَّﺎﺱُ ﻓِﻴﻬِﻢْ ﻟِﻴَﻨْﻜَﻔُّﻮﺍ ﻋَﻨْﻪُ ﻭَﻫَﺬَﺍ ﻛﻠﻪ ﺍﺫﺍ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ ﺫَﻟِﻚَ ﻓَﺈِﻥْ ﻟَﻢْ ﻳُﻤْﻜِﻦ‬ ِّ‫ﺍﻟْﻮَﻋْﻆُ ﺳِﺮًّﺍ ﻭَﺍﻹِْﻧْﻜَﺎﺭُ ﻓَﻠْﻴَﻔْﻌَﻠْﻪُ ﻋَﻼَﻧِﻴَﺔً ﻟِﺌَﻼَّ ﻳَﻀِﻴﻊَ ﺃَﺻْﻞُ ﺍﻟْﺤَﻖ‬ https://al-maktaba.org/book/1711/4039#p2 Source: ‫ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ‬ ) ‫ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻘﻦ‬723 - 804 = ‫ ﻫـ‬1323 - 1401(‫ﻡ‬ https://al-maktaba.org/book/32862/11706#p3 T: Waqii` narrates to us: …. He said, Abu Jaafar was asked about praying with the leaders. He said, pray with them because we also pray with them. Verily Al-Hassan and Al-Hussein used to pray behind Marwaan. He said, I say the people used to say it was Taqiyyah. He said how can that be when they used to abuse Marwan to his face while his was on the Minbaar. 7568 – ،ُ‫ ﻗَﺪْ ﻛَﺎﻥَ ﺍﻟْﺤَﺴَﻦ‬،ْ‫ »ﺻَﻞِّ ﻣَﻌَﻬُﻢْ ﻓَﺈِﻧَّﺎ ﻧُﺼَﻠِّﻲ ﻣَﻌَﻬُﻢ‬:َ‫ ﻓَﻘَﺎﻝ‬،ِ‫ ﺳَﺄَﻟْﺖُ ﺃَﺑَﺎ ﺟَﻌْﻔَﺮٍ ﻋَﻦِ ﺍﻟﺼَّﻼَﺓِ ﻣَﻊَ ﺍﻷُْﻣَﺮَﺍﺀ‬:َ‫ ﻗَﺎﻝ‬،ٌ‫ ﺛﻨﺎ ﺑِﺴْﻄَﺎﻡ‬،ٌ‫ﺣَﺪَّﺛَﻨَﺎ ﻭَﻛِﻴﻊ‬ ُّ‫ ﻭَﻛَﻴْﻒَ ﺇِﻥْ ﻛَﺎﻥَ ﺍﻟْﺤَﺴَﻦُ ﺑْﻦُ ﻋَﻠِﻲٍّ ﻳَﺴُﺐ‬:َ‫ ﻗَﺎﻝ‬،ٌ‫ ﺍﻟﻨَّﺎﺱُ ﻳَﺰْﻋُﻤُﻮﻥَ ﺃَﻥَّ ﺫَﻟِﻚَ ﺗَﻘِﻴَّﺔ‬:ُ‫ ﻓَﻘُﻠْﺖ‬:َ‫ ﻗَﺎﻝ‬،«َ‫ﻭَﺍﻟْﺤُﺴَﻴْﻦُ §ﻳَﺒْﺘَﺪِﺭَﺍﻥِ ﺍﻟﺼَّﻼَﺓَ ﺧَﻠْﻒَ ﻣَﺮْﻭَﺍﻥ‬ ‫ﻣَﺮْﻭَﺍﻥَ ﻓِﻲ ﻭَﺟْﻬِﻪِ ﻭَﻫُﻮَ ﻋَﻠَﻰ ﺍﻟْﻤِﻨْﺒَﺮِ ﺣَﺘَّﻰ ﺗَﻮَﻟَّﻰ‬ :https://al-maktaba.org/book/33038/8424#p1 ________________________________________________________________________________ Q. Is there Ijma`(consensus) on the impermissibility of khuruuj? 7 ‫‪T1: For that reason, the statement of the author of Sharh Muslim that Khuruuj or fighting the‬‬ ‫‪Muslim leader is Haram by the consensus of the Muslims even if he is a an oppressive sinner BUT‬‬ ‫‪THIS Ijma`(consensus) has been CONTESTED by the khuruj of Al-Hussein on Yazid ibn‬‬ ‫‪Muawiyyah, Ibn Zubayr on Abdul Malik bn Marwan and all those that were with them in the‬‬ ‫‪khuruuj from the Salaf.‬‬ ‫ﻣﻐﻨﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﻌﺎﻧﻲ ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻬﺎﺝ ‪Source:‬‬ ‫ﻡ(‪ 000 - 1570‬ﻫـ = ‪000 - 977‬ﺍﻟﺨﻄﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺑﻴﻨﻲ )‬ ‫ﻭَﻳَﺪُﻝُّ ﻟِﺬَﻟِﻚَ ﻗَﻮْﻝُ ﺍﻟْﻤُﺼَﻨِّﻒِ ﻓِﻲ ﺷَﺮْﺡِ ﻣُﺴْﻠِﻢٍ‪ :‬ﺇﻥَّ ﺍﻟْﺨُﺮُﻭﺝَ ﻋَﻠَﻰ ﺍﻷَْﺋِﻤَّﺔِ ﻭَﻗِﺘَﺎﻟَﻬُﻢْ ﺣَﺮَﺍﻡٌ ﺑِﺈِﺟْﻤَﺎﻉِ ﺍﻟْﻤُﺴْﻠِﻤِﻴﻦَ‪ ،‬ﻭَﺇِﻥْ ﻛَﺎﻧُﻮﺍ ﻓَﺴَﻘَﺔً ﻇَﺎﻟِﻤِﻴﻦَ ﻟَﻜِﻦْ‬ ‫ﻧُﻮﺯِﻉَ ﻓِﻲ ﺍﻹِْﺟْﻤَﺎﻉِ ﺑِﺨُﺮُﻭﺝِ ﺍﻟْﺤُﺴَﻴْﻦِ ﻋَﻠَﻰ ﻳَﺰِﻳﺪَ ﺑْﻦِ ﻣُﻌَﺎﻭِﻳَﺔَ ﻭَﺍﺑْﻦِ ﺍﻟﺰُّﺑَﻴْﺮِ ﻋَﻠَﻰ ﻋَﺒْﺪِ ﺍﻟْﻤَﻠِﻚِ ﺑْﻦِ ﻣَﺮْﻭَﺍﻥَ‪ ،‬ﻭَﻣَﻊَ ﻛُﻞٍّ ﻣِﻨْﻬُﻤَﺎ ﺧَﻠْﻖٌ ﻛَﺜِﻴﺮٌ ﻣِﻦْ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺴَّﻠَﻒِ‪ ،‬ﻭَﻗَﺪْ ﻳُﻘَﺎﻝُ‪ :‬ﺇﻥَّ ﻣُﺮَﺍﺩَﻩُ ﺍﻹِْﺟْﻤَﺎﻉُ ﺑَﻌْﺪَ ﺫَﻟِﻚَ‪ ،‬ﻭَﻓَﺮَّﻕَ ﺑَﻌْﻀُﻬُﻢْ ﺑَﻴْﻦَ ﻣَﻦْ ﺗَﻐَﻠَّﺐَ ﻋَﻠَﻰ ﺍﻹِْﻣَﺎﻣَﺔِ ﻓَﻴَﺠُﻮﺯُ ﺍﻟْﺨُﺮُﻭﺝُ ﻋَﻠَﻴْﻪِ ﺇﺫَﺍ ﺟَﺎﺭَ ﻭَﺑَﻐَﻰ‪ ،‬ﻭَﺑَﻴْﻦَ‬ ‫ﻣَﻦْ ﻋُﻘِﺪَﺕْ ﻟَﻪُ ﺍﻹِْﻣَﺎﻣَﺔُ ﻓَﻼَ ﻳَﺠُﻮﺯُ‪ ،‬ﻭَﺗَﺤْﺼُﻞُ ﻣُﺨَﺎﻟَﻔَﺔُ ﺍﻹِْﻣَﺎﻡِ ﺑِﺄَﺣَﺪِ ﺃَﻣْﺮَﻳْﻦِ‪ :‬ﺇﻣَّﺎ )ﺑِﺨُﺮُﻭﺝٍ ﻋَﻠَﻴْﻪِ( ﻧَﻔْﺴِﻪِ )ﻭَ( ﺇﻣَّﺎ ﺑِﺴَﺒَﺐِ )ﺗَﺮْﻙِ ﺍﻻِﻧْﻘِﻴَﺎﺩِ( ﻟَﻪُ )ﺃَﻭْ(‬ ‫ﻻَ‬ ‫‪https://al-maktaba.org/book/11444/2588#p3‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﺻﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﺻﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺳﻨﺔ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ‪Source:‬‬ ‫ﻡ(‪ 1373 - 1436‬ﻫـ = ‪775 - 840‬ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮَﺯِﻳﺮ )‬ ‫( ﺑﻦ ﻣُﺠﺎﻫﺪ ﺍﻹﺟﻤﺎﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﻟﺨﺮﻭﺝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻈﻠﻤﺔ‪ ،‬ﺭﺩﻭﺍ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻗﺒَّﺤﻮﻩ‪1 ،‬ﻭﻣﻤﺎ ﻳﺪﻝُّ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻤﺎ ﺍﺩﻋﻰ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ )‬ ‫ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡٍ ‪-‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻌﺼُّﺒﻪ ﻟﺒﻨﻲ ﺃُﻣَﻴَّﺔ‪ -‬ﻣﻤَّﻦ ﺭﺩَّ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ‪ ،‬ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺑﻐﻴﺮﻩ؟ ﻭﺍﺣﺘﺞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡٍ ﺑﺨﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ‬ ‫( ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺚ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌﻴﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺤﺠﺎﺝ‪2‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺨﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﺑﻦ )‬ ‫‪https://al-maktaba.org/book/31857/3069#p1‬‬ ‫________________________________________________________________________________‬ ‫‪Note: Misunderstand this statement at the risk of your Islam.‬‬ ‫‪Everyone who rebels against a rightful leader who the people have agreed upon is called a Kharijite.‬‬ ‫‪Whether the rebellion was during the days of the rightly guided caliphs or after them in time of the‬‬ ‫‪taabaeen or any other time.‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺤﻞ ‪Source:‬‬ ‫ﻡ(‪ 1086 - 1153‬ﻫـ = ‪479 - 548‬ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ )‬ ‫ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺮﺝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺤﻖ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﺗﻔﻘﺖ ﺍﻟﺠﻤﺎﻋﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴﺎ‪ ،‬ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺨﺮﻭﺝ ﻓﻲ ﺃﻳﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺷﺪﻳﻦ؛‬ ‫‪.‬ﺃﻭ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌﻴﻦ ﺑﺈﺣﺴﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻛﻞ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ‬ ‫‪https://al-maktaba.org/book/11812/130#p6‬‬ ‫________________________________________________________________________________‬ ‫‪8‬‬