Journal of Agricultural Science; Vol. 5, No. 9; 2013
ISSN 1916-9752 E-ISSN 1916-9760
Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education
Comparative Egg Production and Mortality of Two Commercial Egg
Strains, Indigenous Chicken and Their Inbred Progenies
I. Udeh1, C. C. Ogbu2 & V. U. Oleforuh-Okoleh3
1
Department of Animal Science, Delta State University, Asaba Campus, Asaba, Nigeria
2
Department of Animal Science, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
3
Department of Animal Science, Ebonyi State Univesity, Abakaliki, Nigeria
Correspondence: Udeh Ifeanyichukwu, Department of Animal Science, Delta State University, Asaba Campus,
Asaba, Nigeria. Tel: 234-806-386-7396. E-mail: drudeh2005@yahoo.com
Received: May 24, 2013
doi:10.5539/jas.v5n9p148
Accepted: July 9, 2013
Online Published: August 15, 2013
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jas.v5n9p148
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the monthly hen day egg production (HDEP %), egg weights, total egg mass
and mortality of two commercial egg strains and the indigenous chicken with their inbred progenies. The results
indicate significant (P<0.05, 0.01) inbreeding depression in the HDEP %, egg weight and total egg mass of the two
commercial strains but not in the indigenous chicken. Brooding mortality was higher in the parents compared to
their inbred progenies. The inbred progenies recorded higher mortality than the parents during the rearing and
laying periods especially in the two commercial strains. It was concluded that the exotic commercial hybrid should
not be used as breeders for the production of day old chicks for commercial egg production.
Keywords: commercial hybrids, dominance, egg weights, hen day egg production, inbreeding depression, total
egg mass
1. Introduction
Commercial poultry production in Nigeria is predominantly dependent on the exotic chickens imported into the
country. The indigenous chicken constitutes about 80% of the estimated 185 million chicken populations in
Nigeria (FAOSTAT, 2011). Most of the poultry meat and eggs consumed in Nigeria are produced by commercial
farms. The indigenous chicken contributes about 20% of eggs and 50% of meat in Africa (Pym et al., 2006). The
demand of poultry meat and eggs is usually higher during the festive seasons than other periods. During the festive
seasons, many birds are culled or sold and there is usually need for restocking. Consequently the demand for day
old chicks and replacement pullets become too high that desperate and shrewd poultry dealers and hatcheries resort
to the use of commercial hybrids to generate day old chicks through inbreeding (Ogbu et al., 2012). The
consequence of this is that low grade and poor quality chicks are sold to farmers. The performance of these birds is
usually characterized by poor growth rate, poor feed conversion and high mortality. Studies comparing
commercial hybrids, the indigenous chicken with their random bred progenies were conducted by Udeh and Omeje
(2011) and Ogbu et al. (2012). The authors generally reported significant reduction in body weight, weight gain,
feed conversion ratio and increase in age at sexual maturity in the progenies. The present study tends to differ from
the ones reported earlier by comparing the monthly hen day egg production, egg weight at different periods and
mortality of two commercial egg strains, the indigenous chicken with their inbred progenies.
2. Materials and Methods
Experimental Site: The experiment was conducted at the poultry breeding and research unit, Department of Animal
Science, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Enugu, Nigeria.
Experimental Animal: This comprise 250 one day old pullets and 50 one day old cockerels each of two commercial
egg strains: H and N Brown Nick (strain 1) and Black Olympia (strain 2) procured from a reputable hatchery in
Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. The indigenous chicken (strain 3) comprise of 250 chicks of mixed sex hatched from a
population of random breeding local chickens. Their hatching was arranged to correspond with the arrival of the
exotic chicks. The chicks from each strain were brooded and reared separately according to sex from day old to
sexual maturity by adhering to standard management procedures described by Oluyemi and Robert (1979). The
indigenous chicks were separated into sex at 4 weeks of age. Each strain of chickens was reared in two replicates
148
www.ccsenet.org/jas
Journal of Agricultural Science
Vol. 5, No. 9; 2013
on deep litter pens. Within strain mating was done at 28 weeks of age when the birds have laid for two months
using the surviving layers (195 for strain 1, 230 for strain 2 and 125 for strain 3). Mating was random in deep litter
pens using a mating ratio of 1 cock for 10 hens. Eggs were collected for two weeks, incubated and hatched. An
average of 240 chicks was produced from each strain in a single batch. The chicks were divided into two replicates
per strain and brooded in separate pens for 4 weeks. The sexes were separated at 4 weeks of age and the chicks
reared according to strain and sex to sexual maturity. Similar management conditions were provided for the
parents and progenies as much as possible.
Data Collection and Analysis
Data were collected on the following parameters:
1) Mortality which was recorded on daily basis during the brooding, rearing and laying periods.
2) Daily egg numbers recorded from the onset of lay (18-20 weeks) to 40 weeks of age. The egg number
was summarized into HDEP (%).
3) Weight of first eggs (WFE), g: average weight of first 10 eggs laid consecutively for each strain.
4) Egg weight at 30 weeks (EW30), g: determined as the average weight of eggs laid on two consecutive
days by each strain at 30 weeks of age.
5) Egg weight at 40 weeks (EW40), g: the weights of sample of eggs laid per strain on two consecutive
days at 40 weeks of age
6) Total egg mass (TEM), kg: the direct product of egg number (hen day) and average egg weight in each
strain.
Data on HDEP %, egg weight and TEM for parents and progenies in the three strains were subjected to analysis of
variance using the following statistical model, Xijk = µ + Gi + Sij + Eijk
Where
Xijk = the kth observation e.g. egg weight in the jth strain within the ith generation.
µ = Overall mean
Gi = effect of ith generation on the trait.
Sij = effect of the jth strain in the ith generation.
Eijk = residual effects assumed to be independent and normally distributed with zero mean and variance. The
analysis of variance was done using SPSS (2007). Within strain comparison between parents (PO) and progenies
(P1) was done for each trait using the independent t-test option of SPSS (2007). Percentage inbreeding depression
(ID %) of the progeny generation was calculated using the following expression given by Talebi et al. (2010).
ID %
PO – P1
x 100
PO
Where
PO = mean of parents for a trait
P1 = mean of progeny for the same trait
It was assumed that the coefficient of inbreeding in the parental population was zero. The significance of
inbreeding depression was tested by calculating the t-statistic using the formula:
tcal for ID% = estimated value of ID/ standard error of the mean (SEM).
Standard error of the mean (SEM) = √ Ϭ2PO + Ϭ2P1
Where
Ϭ 2PO = variance of parental mean
Ϭ2P1 = variance of progeny mean.
The calculated –t statistic was compared to the tabulated value at error degree of freedom (Ogbu et al., 2012).
3. Results and Discussion
3.1 Hen Day Egg Production
Table 1 presents the monthly HDEP % of the three parent strains and their inbred progenies. There was no
significant difference between the two exotic parents (strains 1 and 2) in HDEP % throughout the 4 months period.
Both strains were however superior to strain 3 for the same trait. This was expected because the exotic had under
149
www.ccsenet.org/jas
Journal of Agricultural Science
Vol. 5, No. 9; 2013
gone continuous improvement for egg production contrary to the indigenous which remain unselected,
unimproved and usually raised under extensive and scavenging conditions. Previous reports showed that the
indigenous chickens were inferior to the exotic strains and their crosses in egg production (Hill & Modebe, 1961;
Akinokun & Dettmers, 1977; Nwosu, 1979; Omeje & Nwosu, 1983). Omeje and Nwosu (1983) attributed the
lower egg production performance of the indigenous chicken compared to the exotic on their long pause length of
3 days. The non significant difference between strain 1 and strain 2 in HDEP % could imply either that the two
strains were not genetically different or they responded similarly to environmental conditions influencing rate of
egg production in chickens. Highly significant (P<0.01) difference between the three inbred progeny strains were
obtained at the 3rd and 4th month of lay with the exotics (strains 1 and 2) performing better than the indigenous
chicken (strain 3). The average of the 4 month periods of lay indicate that strain 2 was the most superior in this
trait, followed by strains 1 and 3 in that order. It is also important to note that HDEP % of the three strains
increased from month 1 to 2, decreased slightly in month 3 (strains 1 and 2) and finally peaked at month 4 in the
parent generation. In the inbred progeny generation, the HDEP % of the three strains showed a steady increase
from month 1 to 4. Table 2 compares the monthly HDEP % of the parents (PO) and progeny (P1) generations of the
three strains. In both strains 1 and 2, the parents were significantly (P<0.01) superior to their progenies in HDEP %
whereas in strain 3, such difference between the two generations were not significant (P>0.05) in most of the
periods. The average of the 4 months period indicates the superiority of the parents over the progenies in strains 1
and 2 only. The apparent superiority of the two exotic parent strains (PO) over their inbred progenies (P1) in
HDEP % indicates decrease in performance of the progenies in the trait. Such decrease in performance was
reported by Ogbu et al. (2012) for body weight, weight gain, and feed conversion ratio in the same flock of
chickens. The decrease in performance referred to as inbreeding depression was further tested for significance and
shown in table 3. The estimates were mostly significant (P<0.05, 0.01) in strains 1 and 2 and mostly negative and
non significant (P>0.05) in strain 3. It was highest in month 1 in both strains 1 (74.46%) and 2 (67.00%) but
decreased from month 1 to 3. The average estimates for the 4 months were as follows: strain 1 (51.40%), strain 2
(42.39%) and strain 3(-6.68%). The phenomenon of inbreeding depression arises from dominance gene action
which is known to affect fitness traits (Falconer & Mackey, 1996).It is usually characterized by loss of
heterozygosity and break up of epistatic gene combinations in the parents (Kerje et al., 2003; Subramanya &
Bishop, 2011). Studies by Foster and Kilpatrick (1987), Abplanalp (1990) and Flock et al. (1991) showed that
inbreeding depression was higher in egg number compared with other egg production traits. The non-significant
inbreeding depression for HDEP % in strain 3 may be due to the fact that the factors responsible for the trait have
stabilized by long term panmixia among the indigenous chicken population in the wild state so that one generation
of inbreeding might not have been strong enough to dislodge most of the loci.
Table 1. Monthly Hen day egg Production of the three Parent Strains and their inbred Progenies
Month
1
2
3
4
0-4 months
Parent
Strain 1
59.05
b
±5.65
64.94
b
±4.65
60.66
b
±3.73
81.28
b
±4.75
66.83
b
± 2.57
Strain 2
52.20
b
2.83
63.59
2.03
20.56
34.64
34.72
26.47
2.01
15.08
a
29.30
40.42
45.10
32.48
1.92
32.99
45.58
48.62
36.19
2.40
17.34a
26.56a
1.21
b
32.62a
0.99
b
3.71
ab
Strain 3
1.96
a
4.68
b
3.12
a
17.56
a
2.24
b
3.10
a
Strain 2
1.70
a
2.18
a
2.89
b
Strain 1
1.53
a
4.46
b
2.06
62.82
15.96
a
1.15
b
2.73
82.50
Strain 3
1.30
b
3.03
51.99
Inbred progeny
36.14a
1.06
b
28.16a
1.43
For each generation, monthly row means with different superscript letters are significantly different (P<0.01).
150
www.ccsenet.org/jas
Journal of Agricultural Science
Vol. 5, No. 9; 2013
Table 2. Comparative monthly hen day egg Production of three parent strains (PO) and their inbred Progeny (P1)
Generations
1
2
3
4
0-4 months
Strain
2
1
Month
Po
59.05b
±5.65
64.94b
±4.65
60.66b
±3.73
81.28b
±4.75
66.83b
± 2.57
P1
15.08a
1.53
29.30b
2.18
40.42b
3.10
45.10a
3.12
32.48a
1.92
Po
53.20b
2.83
63.59b
3.03
51.99b
2.73
82.50b
2.06
62.82b
2.03
P1
17.56a
1.70
32.99a
2.24
45.58a
4.46
48.62a
3.71
36.19a
2.40
3
Po
15.96a
1.30
20.56a
1.15
34.64a
4.26
34.72a
2.89
26.47a
2.01
P1
17.34a
1.96
26.56a
1.21
32.62a
0.99
36.14a
1.06
28.16a
1.43
For all row values within each strain, a<b (P<0.01).
Table 3. Percentage inbreeding depression (ID) and T-statistic (t cal) of monthly hen day egg production of two
commercial egg strains and the indigenous chickens
Strain
Month Gen
1
2
3
4
0-4 months
PO
P1
PO
P1
PO
P1
PO
P1
PO
P1
Mean
59.05
15.08
64.94
29.30
60.66
40.42
81.28
45.10
66.83
32.48
1
ID (t cal)
74.46**(2.95)
54.88**(2.67)
32.64NS(1.68)
44.51*(1.96)
51.40**(4.01)
Mean
53.20
17.56
63.59
32.99
51.99
45.58
82.50
48.62
62.82
36.19
2
ID (t cal)
67.00**(5.38)
48.12*(3.19)
12.33NS(0.59)
41.07*(2.42)
42.39**(3.37)
Mean
15.96
17.34
20.56
26.56
34.64
32.62
34.72
36.14
26.47
28.16
3
ID (t cal)
-8.65NS (0.30)
-29.18*(6.18)
5.83NS(0.45)
-4.09NS(0.47)
-6.38NS(0.91)
* Significant (P<0.05), ** significant (P<0.01).
NS: Not significant (P>0.05). Tabulated t-statistic at 0.95 = 1.7530, 0.99 = 2.602 for df = 15.
3.2 Egg Weight and Total Egg Mass
The results of egg weight and total egg mass of the three parents and the inbred progenies are presented in Table 4.
As observed in HDEP %, the indigenous chicken (strain 3) was very inferior to the exotic (strains 1 and 2) in egg
weight and total egg mass in both parents and progeny generations for the same reason that they were unselected
and undeveloped. On the other hand, the exotic chickens have been selected and developed over a long time for
high egg production. Between the exotic types, strain 1 was significantly (P<0.01) superior to strain 2 in WFE and
EW30 in the parent generation. This may be attributed to the late maturing of strain 1 which came to lay about 12
days after strain 2 and 3. It has been established that age at first egg influences egg weight in poultry especially
during the early part of lay (Adenowo et al., 1995; Udeh, 2010). The trend was reversed in the progeny generation
where strain 2 was superior to strain 1 on WFE and TEM. This may be due to the late coming to lay of strain 2
compared to strain 1. The comparison between parents and inbred progeny generations of the three strains in egg
weight and total egg mass are presented in Table 5. The parents (PO) were significantly (P<0.01) superior to the
progeny (P1) generation in WFE, EW30, EW40 and TEM in strain 1 and only in EW40 and TEM in strain 2. The
two generations of strain 3 were similar in WFE, EW30, EW40 and TEM. Table 6 shows that percentage
inbreeding depression (ID) for WFE, EW30, EW40 and TEM were significant (P<0.05, 0.01) in strains 1 and 2 but
151
www.ccsenet.org/jas
Journal of Agricultural Science
Vol. 5, No. 9; 2013
not in strain 3. The implication was that strains 1 and 2 carried different complementary gene pairs for egg weight
while the genes governing the trait in the indigenous had become more homozygous. Inbreeding depression occurs
as a result of loss of fitness associated with dominant genes at heterozygous loci. According to Woodard et al
(1983) inbreeding in chicken has been found to have deleterious effect on most reproductive traits such as egg
production, fertility, hatchability and post hatch mortality.
Table 4. Egg weight at different periods and total egg mass of the three parent strains and their inbred progenies
Parent
Traits
Strain 1
c
WFE;g
EW30, g
EW40, g
TEM (weekly),kg
49.41
±0.70
56.06c
±0.37
59.81b
0.46
0.27b
0.01
Progeny
Strain 2
b
Strain 3
Strain 1
a
41.76
0.81
53.85b
0.49
58.26b
0.52
0.24b
0.01
b
33.98
0.24
41.49a
0.49
41.34a
0.67
0.08a
0.01
45.70
1.00
52.21b
0.69
54.93b
1.07
0.12b
0.01
Strain 2
c
Strain 3
34.19a
0.36
40.61a
0.62
40.51a
0.63
0.08a
0.01
48.96
0.80
53.52b
0.63
54.22b
0.68
0.13b
0.01
Within each generation, row means superscripted with different letters are significantly different (P<0.01).
Note: WFE: Weight of first egg, EW 30: Egg weight at 30 weeks of age, EW40: Egg weight at 40 weeks of age,
TEM: Total egg mass.
Table 5. Comparative mean values for egg weight and total egg mass of three parent strains (PO) and their inbred
progeny (P1)
Strain
Traits
1
WFE, g
EW30, g
EW40, g
TEM (weekly),kg
Po
49.14b
±0.70
56.06b
±0.37
59.81b
±0.46
0.27b
±0.01
2
P1
45.70a
1.00
52.21a
0.69
54.93a
1.07
0.12a
0.01
Po
41.76a
0.81
53.85a
0.49
58.26b
0.52
0.24b
0.02
3
P1
48.96b
0.80
53.52a
0.63
54.22a
1.07
0.13a
0.01
Po
33.98a
0.24
41.49a
0.49
41.34a
0.67
0.08a
0.02
P1
34.19a
0.36
40.61a
0.62
40.51a
0.63
0.08a
0.01
For each strain results and trait, mean values with different superscript letters are significantly different (P<0.01).
Table 6. Percentage inbreeding depression (ID) and T-statistics (t cal) of egg weight and total egg mass of two
commercial egg strains and the indigenous chickens
Strain
Trait
WFE
EW30
EW40
TEM
Gen.
PO
P1
PO
P1
PO
P1
PO
P1
Mean
49.41
45.70
56.06
52.21
59.81
54.93
0.27
0.12
1
ID(t cal)
7.51*(1.95)
6.87*(2.47)
8.16*(2.22)
62.96*(19.73)
Mean
41.76
48.96
53.85
53.52
58.26
54.22
0.24
0.13
2
ID(t cal)
-17.24*(4.79)
0.61NS(0.24)
6.93*(2.56)
45.83**(35.57)
* Significant (P<0.05), ** significant (P<0.01), NS: Not significant (P>0.05).
152
Mean
33.98
34.19
41.49
40.61
41.34
40.51
0.08
0.08
3
ID(t cal)
-0.62NS (0.45)
2.12NS(0.85)
2.01NS(0.69)
0.00(0.00)
www.ccsenet.org/jas
Journal of Agricultural Science
Vol. 5, No. 9; 2013
3.3 Percentage Mortality
Table 7 presents the percentage mortality of the three parent strains and their inbred progenies. There was higher
incident of mortality during the brooding period than the rearing or laying periods in the parents (PO) and progeny
(P1) generations. This was quite in order because at the brooding stage the chicks were highly sensitive to
environmental conditions than adult birds. The thermo-regulatory system in chicks had not developed which make
them vulnerable to extreme temperature conditions. Other factors that can cause brooding house mortality are
exhaustion caused by high temperature, poor ventilation, high intensity of light, stress of transportation, pasty
vents or yolk sac infection (Raghavan, 1999). Among the parent strains, brooding house mortality was highest in
strain 3 (50.61%), followed by strain 1 (21.33%) and strain 2 (7.37%). The reason was that apart from the
aforementioned factors which cause mortality in chicks, the indigenous chicken (strain 3) had the initial problem
of adapting to intensive system of management. Similar observation was reported by Demeke (2004) in the
indigenous chicken of Ethiopia. The relatively higher brooding mortality suffered by strain 1 compared to strain 2
was due to higher susceptibility of strain 1 chicks to coccidiosis which affected the exotic chicken during the first
6 weeks of age. Table 8 compares the mortality rate of parents (PO) with the progeny (P1) strains. The parents
suffered higher brooding house mortality than their progeny. This could be attributed to greater susceptibility of
the parents to environmental conditions such as diseases during the brooding period than the progenies. In the case
of the indigenous chicken, there was the initial problem of the parent chicks adapting to the intensive system of
management. The trend was reversed during the rearing and laying periods when the inbred progenies recorded
higher mortality compared with the parents especially in strains 1 and 2. This was probably as a result of
inbreeding which accumulated lethal and deleterious genes in these strains thereby minimizing their chances of
survival. Ibe et al. (1983) reported that inbreeding resulted to increased mortality in chicken. There was no incident
of laying mortality in both the parent and progeny generations of strain 3. The mean values of the three periods
combined indicated that the progeny had lower mortality than the parent strains. This might have been caused by
the higher brooding mortality observed in the parents compared with the progeny strains.
Table 7. Percentage mortality of the three parent strains and their inbred progenies at different periods
Parent
Periods
Inbred Progeny
Strain 1
Strain 2
Strain 3
Strain 1
Brooding
21.33
7.37
50.61
9.42
2.28
7.90
Rearing
1.67
0.00
2.09
6.85
3.33
6.92
Laying
0.00
1.32
0.00
3.59
1.59
0.00
7.67
2.90
17.57
6.62
2.40
4.94
±6.85
2.27
16.53
1.69
0.51
2.49
0-40 weeks
Strain 2
Strain 3
Note: Results not tested statistically because the mortality data were few.
Table 8. Comparative mortality (%) of parents (PO) and progeny (P1) generations of three strains of chicken
Strain
1
2
3
Periods
PO
P1
PO
P1
PO
P1
Brooding
21.33
9.42
7.37
2.28
50.61
7.90
Rearing
1.67
6.85
0.00
3.33
2.09
6.92
Laying
0.00
3.59
1.32
1.59
0.00
0.00
0-40 weeks
7.67
6.62
2.90
2.40
17.57
4.94
4. Conclusion and Recommendation
The most important conclusions drawn from this study are:
1) There was significant decrease in the HDEP %, egg weight and total egg mass in the progenies of the
two commercial hybrid strains but not in the indigenous chicken. The significant decrease was referred
to as inbreeding depression (ID).
153
www.ccsenet.org/jas
Journal of Agricultural Science
Vol. 5, No. 9; 2013
2) Higher brooding mortality was recorded in the parent strains compared to their progenies. The reverse
was the case for rearing and laying mortality in the two commercial hybrid strains.
3) Therefore, generating replacement stocks from commercial hybrid strains should be avoided because of
its obvious poor performance in growth and egg production traits.
References
Abplanalp, H. (1990). Inbreeding. In R. D. Crawford (Ed.), Poultry breeding and genetics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Adenowo, J. A., Omeje, S. I., & Dim, N. I. (1995). Evaluation of pure and crossbred parent stock pullets. Egg
weight, Body weight and Sexual maturity. Nig. J. Anim. Prod., 22(1), 10-14.
Akinokun, O., & Dettmers, A. (1977). Performance of the indigenous chickens of Nigeria and the Apollo (1): Egg
weight, rate of production and factors affecting them. Nig. J. Anim. Prod., 4(1), 67-79.
Demeke, S. (2004). Egg production performance of local and white leghorn hens under intensive and rural
household conditions in Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Dev., 16(2), 1-6.
Falconer, D. S., & Mackey, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th ed.). Longman, Harlow.
FAOSTAT. (2011). FAOSTAT database on Agriculture. Retrieved from www.fao.org/Library
Flock, D., Ameli, K., & Gloder, P. (1991). Inbreeding and heterosis on quantitative traits in a white leghorn
population under long term reciprocal recurrent selection. Brit. Poult.Sci., 32, 451-462.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071669108417370
Foster, W. H., & Kilpatrick, D. J. (1987). Inbreeding in poultry: genetic drift and inbreeding depression. Record of
Agricultural Research, 35. Dept. of Agric. Northern Ireland.
Hill, D. H., & Modebe, A. N. A. (1961). Poultry production at the University College Ibadan (1950-1958). Univ.
of Ibadan, Fac. of Agric. Technical Bulletin no. 2.
Ibe, S. N., Rutledge, J. T., & Mcgibbon, W. H. (1983). Inbreeding effects on traits with and without selection for
part record rate of lay in chicken. Poult. Sci., 62, 1543-1547. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0621543
Kerje, S., Carlborg, O., Jecobsson, L., Schute, K., Hartmann, C., Jensen, P., & Andersson, L. (2003). The two fold
difference in adult size between the red jungle fowl and white leghorn chickens is largely explained by a
limited number of QTL. Animal Genetics, 34, 264-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2052.2003.01000.x
Nwosu, C. C. (1979). Characterization of the local chicken in Nigeria and its potential for egg and meat production.
In poultry production in Nigeria. Proc. 1st National seminar on poultry Production, Zaria P., 187-210.
Ogbu, C. C., Udeh, I., & Nwakpu, P. C. (2012). Comparative performance of two commercial egg strains, the
indigenous chickens and their random bred progenies. Livestock research for rural development, 24(3), 1-8.
Oluyemi, J. A., & Robert, F. A. (1979). Poultry Production in warm wet climates. London: Macmillan publishers
Limited.
Omeje, S. I., & Nwosu, C. C.(1983). Egg production patterns in local chickens and their crosses in the short term.
Nig. J. Anim. Prod., 10(2), 91-96.
Pym, R. A. E., Guerne Bleich, E., & Hoffman, I. (2006). The relative contribution of indigenous chicken breeds to
poultry meat and egg production and consumption in the developing countries of Africa and Asia.
Proceedings of the XII European Poultry Conference, Verona, Italy.
Raghavan, V. (1999). Give day-old chicks the best start. In: world poultry. Elsevier, 15(1), 28-29.
SPSS. (2007). Statistical Package for the Society Sciences. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
Subramanya, G., & Bishop, S. C. (2011). Analysis of heterosis and recombination loss for fitness and production
traits in different hybrids of mulbery silk moth: Bombyx mori. Entomology Research, 41, 18-23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5967.2010.00313.x
Talebi, E., Subramanya, G., & Bakkappa, S. (2010). An investigation of heterosis and inbreeding depressionint he
sick worm (Bombyx moric). ARPN Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 5(3), 52-55.
Udeh, I. (2010). Mode of inheritance and interrelationship among age at first egg, body weight at first egg and
weight of first egg in local and exotic inbred chicken crosses. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 9(10), 948-953.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.948.953
154
www.ccsenet.org/jas
Journal of Agricultural Science
Vol. 5, No. 9; 2013
Udeh, I., & Omeje, S. I. (2011). Growth and short term egg production of two exotic (layer type) and the local
chickens compared with their F1 inbred progenies. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 10(3), 221-224.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2011.221.224
Woodard, A. E., Abplanalp, H., Pisenti J. M., &Snyder, L. R. (1983). Inbreeding effects on reproductive traits in
the ring necked pheasant. Poult. Sci., 62, 1725-1730. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0621725
Copyrights
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
155
View publication stats