View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk
brought to you by
CORE
provided by Edinburgh Research Archive
Research
Collaborations
A guide for early career researchers
by early career researchers
LERU Doctoral Summer School
Building Research Capacity and a Collaborative
Global Community
Authors
Adeline Abou-Ali, Universitat de Barcelona
Ahmed Mazari, Sorbonne University
Aline Scherer, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität
München
Amanda Dziubińska, University of Warsaw
Ana Pardo García, The University of Edinburgh
Anna Mateja Punstein, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität
Heidelberg
Anna Luisa Grimm, University of Zurich
Annette Sophie Bösmeier, Albert-LudwigsUniversität Freiburg
Ariadna Feliu, Universitat de Barcelona
Brian Li Han Wong, University College London
Camilla Langlands-Perry, Université Paris-Sud
Christin Henein, University College London
Colum O’Leary, University of Oxford
Damla Kuz, University of Strasbourg
Daria Vdovenko, University of Zurich
Diego Mesa, Imperial College London
Dora Gelo, University of Zagreb
Elisabetta Romani, University of Milan
Emer Emily Neenan, Trinity College Dublin
Eva Kaulich, University of Cambridge
Gary Hannon, Trinity College Dublin
Gemma O’Sullivan, Trinity College Dublin
Giulia Carla Spolidoro, University of Milan
Henrietta Baker, University of Edinburgh
Ilona Domen, Utrecht University
Jamie Sugrue, Trinity College Dublin
Jan Maleček, Charles University in Prague
Joanna Strycharz, University of Amsterdam
Josephine Harmon, University College London
Juliana E. Gonçalves, KU Leuven
Julie Vanderlinden, KU Leuven
Kaveh Dianati, University College London
Kinga Káplár-Kodácsy, Eötvös Loránd University
Kiran Zahra, University of Zurich
Mariam Hachem, Sorbonne University
Miriam Klaus, University of Cambridge
Miriam Laufer, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität
Freiburg
Mo Atif, Sorbonne University
Mohamed A. Elhadad, Ludwig-MaximiliansUniversität München
Nathalie Dupin, The University of Edinburgh
Petra Bod, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität
München
Roosmarijn van Woerden, Utrecht University
Sara Gunnarsson, Lund University
Sarah Assaad, University of Cambridge
Sarah Briggs, University of Oxford
Shelby Shrigley, Lund University
Shishir Pant, University of Helsinki
Smiljana Cvjetković, University of Belgrade
Stefano Piazza, University of Milan
Tommaso Taroni, University of Milan
Veera Kankainen, University of Helsinki
Wiebe Hommes, University of Amsterdam
Editors
Emily Woollen, University of Edinburgh
Sara Shinton, University of Edinburgh
Sarah Thomas, University of Edinburgh
This work is licensed under a CC-BY licence
To view a copy of this license, visit: https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
1
Contents
3
Introduction
4
Motivations for Collaborations
5
Opening Doors
6
Success Factors
8
Challenges of Collaborations
10
Support for Collaborations
11
Partnership Agreements
12
Partners Beyond Academia
13
Cultural Dimensions
14
Key Insights
17
Top Tips
18
Do it Yourself
19
Acknowledgements
2
Introduction
When the University of Edinburgh proposed
international collaboration as a theme for the
annual LERU doctoral summer school, it was
obvious for LERU to support that idea. I am
delighted to take this opportunity to emphasise
the opportunities that collaborations offer. Rather
than telling researchers about collaboration, the
vision of the organising team was to create a
collaborative challenge for the summer school
attendees – to create a high quality publication
in five days! The guide you are now reading
demonstrates how much a group of diverse and
motivated researchers can achieve when they
pool their skills and experiences to work together.
LERU is itself a collaboration between 23
universities in 12 European countries which has
proven to be very successful. Over the past 15
years, joint lobby activities have been set up,
joint best practices have been developed, joint
research projects have been implemented and
joint degree programs have been offered, all
of this enhancing collaboration and mobility
between the 23 members’ leadership teams,
researchers and students.
Clearly, national, European and international
collaboration is beneficial for research, innovation
and education: it increases interaction between
people, exchange of ideas, development of
breakthroughs, speed of scientific progress,
exchange of scientific knowledge, understanding
of cultural differences, and the quality of the
student experience. This guide draws from the
experiences of researchers from across the LERU
network and summarises the many benefits of
Image credit: DVeerle Van Kerckhove
The League of European Research Universities
(LERU) organises a summer school each year at
one of the member universities on a different
theme, inviting PhD students from Europe’s
top research-intensive universities. This year’s
LERU summer school was organised around
the theme of collaboration in research, with
the aim of developing a guidebook for early
career researchers including tips and advice for
successful collaborations.
working together, whilst being honest and realistic
about the challenges that can arise.
In the weeks leading up to the workshop, each
participant conducted an interview with a senior
researcher in their field asking them about their
insights in and experience of collaboration. Also,
throughout the workshop, participants shared
their thoughts and experiences on collaborating
with academic and non-academic partners, for
instance success factors, challenges, cultural
aspects, etc. This guidebook, therefore, is a result
of the synthesis of the initial input from senior
researcher interviews with input from participants
based not only on their past experiences but also
on what they learnt throughout the workshop
while listening to invited speakers.
I am confident that the quality of this guide
will demonstrate what a great experience our
doctoral researchers had and I hope it will inspire
many others to work collaboratively.
- Prof. Kurt Deketelaere, Secretary-General, LERU
3
Motivations for Collaborations
We firstly asked our interviewees about their motivations to collaborate. Understanding these from the
beginning would help to design and run the project to deliver the needs of all partners.
In the diagram below, we have categorised the main reasons for collaborating. These are further elaborated by
particularly significant comments gained from our research.
B
im ig
pa
ct
ity
tun d
r
o
n
p
Op row a
g
to learn
Ad
rea dress
pro l-lif
ble e
ms
A
i pp
in mpo ly f
te
o
rn r ta r
gr ati nt
an on
ts al
Different
inputs on
your topic
Resources
(money, data,
samples,
equipment)
Work with
the best
people,
wherever
they are
ce
van ce
d
a
n
To scie
e
th
d
t
an
n men
u
F fill
ful
gn
iti
tf
un
pi
Ke
e
din
fun
nti
fy
er
ps
ca
re
4
g
on
Ide
co
G
to ain a
res cc
ou ess
rce
s
Re
De
ve
lo
pe
Ga
ski in ne
rsp lls
w
ec and
tiv
es
Push s
darie
boun
c S
pr om olv
ob pl e
le ex
m
s
Number of post-it’s
ing
Build r
ge
a lar k
or
netw
Opening Doors
Suggestions for introducing yourself and your research to a mixed
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Focus less on the details of your research and place emphasis on the nature of the
collaboration you are looking for to attract the right people.
Interact with the audience, ask questions, tell jokes or get them to stand up.
Be personable and enthusiastic – it’s contagious if you convey how interesting you find
your work.
Find something that everybody can relate to and start with it.
Don’t use jargon!
Talk about the skills you have as these may be valuable for other projects or ideas.
Design simple visuals, but invest time in them so they are clear, appealing to look at and
explain your work to a broad audience.
Be concise in what you say and what is on the slides. Too much text or details can be
distracting especially if they are inconsistent with what you’re saying.
Be open-minded about who is listening as you might find collaborations in unexpected
places – don’t turn down possibilities with pre-conceived assumptions about who will or
won’t be interested.
Imagine you’re explaining your research to someone in an elevator and you have until they
get off to get them engaged.
Encourage your audience to participate by asking for questions, ideas or collaborations.
Use themes to interest people in related/similar fields.
Mention topics you are interested in - research can be very specific and it can be hard to
extrapolate the research project to wider skill areas or interests if these aren’t highlighted.
People are interested in people, so share a personal moment with someone about yourself
(i.e. a joke, being really passionate, a fun fact e.g. “I can’t draw!”; “I won the three minute
thesis!”; “I’m excited to X!”)
Think about what you want to achieve with your introduction and design it with this end in
mind. What do your audience need to know to take the action you want them to?
Practice your introduction with people from other fields so they can help you see what
might spark an idea in someone else.
Using keywords (such as data mining) to help others connect with you and remember you
better.
Keep in mind the impact of what you do and why you do it instead of technical details
about how you do it.
Have a few versions ready so you can adapt your introduction to the public and the room
if you learn more about them before you present.
Use your slide as a visual aid – design it to reinforce the key points you want people to
remember.
5
Success Factors
Six key success factors for collaborations were identified based on the interviews and our workshop discussions.
These six success factors are listed below, along with the good practice to achieve them.
Trusting relationships
Meet face-to-face
to foster personal
connections
Be ethical and
responsible; create an
explicit code of conduct
from the beginning
Transparency is key; all
partners should have
access to all data and
materials where possible
Avoid hierarchy of
disciplines, and value
other perspectives
Be clear about your aims,
and honest about your
own skills and limitations
Commit to the project
Shared vision and clear goals
Have explicit and
transparent discussion of
vision with all partners
Clearly formulate goals
and commitments
Make an effort to get to
know your collaborators’
key professional interests
Don’t lose perspective
of the collaboration
objectives
Understand each others’
backgrounds and
motivations
Value all members
equally
Clear and effective communication
Establish a common
language
Have frequent
communication with all
members
Plan meetings carefully
and follow up afterwards
Be thoughtful about
choosing forms of
communication
Listen actively, and
encourage all members
to share opinions
Openly discuss
differences as soon as
they arise
6
Mutual benefits
Discuss the benefits to all
parties
Not everyone can get
everything; seek fair
compromises
Build strategic alliances
with collaborators you
can benefit from
Explore opportunities in
your differences
Discuss patents,
intellectual property, and
authorship
Share knowledge and
ideas
Effective management and support
Ensure common
understanding of
expectations, roles, and
outcomes
Ensure there
is appropriate
administrative and
technical support
Nominate a central
contact or project
manager
Set and communicate
clear, achievable
deadlines and schedules
Have regular face-to-face
meetings to monitor
progress
Ensure files, data, and
schedules are stored
securely and ethically
Positive team dynamics
Be aware of power
dynamics
Actively listen to others’
inputs and concerns
Keep a positive, engaged,
and passionate attitude
Engage in social activities
together
Be willing to work
through personal
differences
Make a conscious effort
to be inclusive
Icon credit: Diego Mesa
7
Challenges of Collaborations
Challenges will inevitably arise during collaborations. Some can be prevented during the design of the
collaboration (light grey/white clouds) and solved through appropriate processes such as having a partnership
agreement, implementing good practice and seeking advice from support services.
Some can arise during the collaboration (grey clouds) and may not have clear guidelines when it comes to dealing
with them. However, these may be addressed by the collaborators and managed.
Some may be due to the fact that collaborations involve different people with different ideas, cultures and
backgrounds (black clouds). These differences are inherent, and the only solution when these clash is to become
aware of them and do your best to find a way to deal with them.
No
common
vocabulary or
language
Language
barrier, lack of
communication or
misconceptions, lack
of transparency
Mismatch
of visions and
goals, expectations,
priorities and
responsbility
Problem
with leadership,
power dynamics and
hierarchial structure
Lack
of team
cohesion,
motivation and
committment
No
mechanisms
for dealing with
conflicts or lack of
trust
Cultural,
social
& political
differences
Clash
of personality
and lack of
interpersonal skills
Differences
between
disciplines
8
Learn from
others, develop
constructive feedback
Learning
skills and reflect
and lack
regularly
of reflection, no
feedback or negative
feedback management
Refer to partnership
agreement, discuss and
agree on publication/
Competition,
outputs at the start
lack of
acknowledgement,
lack of agreement on
authorship and journal
preference
Start project
with a plan and have
good organisational
skills
Logistical
problems,
legal and ethical
challenges, lack of
planning and support
Equality,
diversity and
inclusion
Funding
management
and unfair
distribution of
resources
Recruitment
policies, respect
of others, access to
opportunities
9
Budget planning
and support staff
Support for Collaborations
Collaborations are built around the expertise of researchers to address a specific problem. Professional services
can offer support in many areas while you are developing your ideas. Involving services early is essential for
getting the best out of this support. The figure below illustrates the types of services you may have access to and
benefit from (in box), including relevant examples of each (outside box).
FINANCE
Support claiming
of income from
research funders,
manage contractual
and statutory
compliance, audit
and close of grants
LEGAL/IP
Ensure all partners
are fully informed
on relevant legal
matters
RESEARCH DATA
FUNDING
Provide support
for writing data
management plans
and data sharing
agreements
Advise on identifying
suitable sources of
funding and writing
applications
Enable clear
communication
within projects to
avoid potential
conflicts with
publications
Fulfill funders
requirements
for grant
applications
Provide up-todate reports
on best use of
funding within
projects
Enable access
to soft skill
training
Offer consultations
on different
international
policies/laws to
highlight cultural
differences
Enable legal
agreements
between
partners
Provide solutions
for issues on noncompliance
Help bring a
product or service
to market
ETHICS
COMMERCIALISATION
Ensure ethical
principles are
respected
throughout the
project
Provide support on
commercialising a product
or service
10
SKILLS &
LEADERSHIP
Offer researcher
development
workshops at all
levels
INTERNATIONAL
PARTNERSHIPS
Provide preagreement
information on
the differences/
similarities in policies
governing the
partners
Partnership Agreements
Diversity in collaborations brings many benefits, but also adds complexity. Increasingly funders and
institutions are asking collaborative teams to work through partnership agreements to ensure that
projects are set up effectively and with advance thinking about potential challenges. Although these
agreements are designed to reduce problems, they can reveal certain sensitivities that lie beneath the
surface. Recognising these and speaking honestly will help ensure the process of coming to agreement is
positive and productive. The iceberg below summarises some of the underlying sensitivities that may be
triggered when discussions about potential future problems take place. Success factors surrounding the
iceberg can help reduce these tensions and keep positive engagement on track.
“Is
everyone ready
to sign a partnership
agreement?”
Do we share the same
research standards (e.g.
ethics, data, etc)?
Establish
common
research standards
including advice from
global research teams
if needed
Can we trust each
other and function well
as a team?
Can we communicate
effectively and manage
conflict openly?
Are we all equally
committed and included?
Agree
on welldefined operating
procedures and
communication
channels
Agree
a conflict
management
plan
What happens when the project finishes?
- To me? To the data? To the IP? In the
publication? To the materials?
How will we handle
external pressures that
influence the project?
11
Bring
in expert
external support
to make a postproject plan
Create
an
environment
of goodwill,
trust and open
communication
Partners Beyond Academia
If your partners are from outside higher education institutions, you should expect them to approach research
and collaborations with different motivations and viewpoints. If you understand these it can help avoid
misunderstandings and build a shared vision for the project shared by all partners.
Researchers may collaborate with various partners beyond academia – government, industries, charities,
NGOs, health care, the creative sector and the public.
Icon credit: Diego Mesa
Approach all
partnerships with a
spirit of generosity
and reciprocity
Consider the
differences in
working paces
when planning
deadlines
Preserve academic
integrity against
other motivations
Find a common
language, avoid jargon,
define terms and clarify
the relevance of the
project
KEY MESSAGES FOR
WORKING WITH
PARTNERS BEYOND
ACADEMIA
Be diplomatic and
aware of political
agendas and power
dynamics
Take into account
data privacy and
confidentiality
Agree upon the legal
rights of each partners
(copyrights, IPR, artistic)
Understand
differences in
vision, goals and
motivations
Involve the public
not just engage
12
Recognize the
diverse values that
each partner can
bring
Cultural Dimensions
“Culture is the collective programming of the human mind that distinguishes the members of one human group
from those of another. Culture in this sense is a system of collectively held values.”
- Hofstede, 1991
Although we have discussed many systems and processes to support collaborations, it is important to recognise
other factors. Culture can influence behaviours and attitudes in many ways. Research collaborations will
benefit from diverse cultures if time is invested in building understanding. When embarking on a collaboration,
ask yourself key questions about how culture will affect your collaboration.
Who is in charge and what does this mean?
What might cause conflict in this work?
What are the levels of (administrative) support for collaboration in your institution?
What inspires you in this collaboration?
What are the core principles, standards and ethics of your work?
What is your view of the world?
Are there any common misconceptions about you or your research that you’ve faced?
How do you feel about challenging leaders?
Are there any words that you use which might not mean what I think they mean?
How do you deal with conflict?
Who would be involved in writing the proposed published outputs, and what would these look like?
How important are deadlines to you?
What will you take responsibility for?
What value does this project have to your career?
What does rigour look like in your field?
What worries you about the project?
Reference
Hofstede, G. (1991), Cultures and Organizations: Software of the mind, London: McGraw-Hill
13
Key Insights
The interviewees provided deep insights into their experiences of collaborations and main themes
were extracted on communication, motivations, benefits, team dynamics and challenges.
Example quotes are presented below to illustrate the themes.
Communication &
Language
Motivation &
Interest
Benefits &
Outcomes
“It’s
very valuable to
have a lot of people working on
one particular project with different
expertise [...] because one person cannot
know everything so it’s good to have experts
in their own fields coming together to advance
whatever resource or primary research
project.”
- Dr. Marta Costa, University of
Cambridge
Team Dynamics &
Trust
Facing Challenges
“It is
also difficult when you
work with people who don’t think
like you. So it’s always important to
focus on the science, the project and the
people equally.”
- Dr. Makoto Miyara, Sorbonne
University
“Who
is into research is
driven by curiosity in the first
place, but also needs to consider that
the ultimate task is to produce something
more than personal knowledge, which is “shared
knowledge”: in other terms as researchers we
produce publications. Authorship and author’s
position are important themes and have to be
discussed.”
- Dr. Thomas Langer, The
University of Milan
“In
order to sit at the
same table, you have to
be interested what the others
are doing and where they come
from.”
- Dr. Karoliina Snell,
University of Helsinki
“[A
key challenge is]
finding ways to improve together
even when this implies having to
accept partners’ conditions (i.e. study
design, distribution of funds, dissemination
of the results) or having a strong position
to establish your own to reach a win-win
collaboration.”
- Dr. Esteve Fernández, University
of Barcelona
“What
you have to do when
you work with the collaboration
is work out where you rub up against
each other and try to make that a creative,
positive thing rather than negative.”
- Prof. Carol Brayne, University of
Cambridge
14
“Collaboration
projects have been the
most interesting and rewarding
pieces of work I have ever been part
of, but also, some collaborations have
been the biggest frustrations of my
career.”
- Prof. Mark Rehkämper, Imperial
College London
“Everything
is bounded on good
interpersonal relationships.
That’s where it has to start. It’s
driven by people and the right
people.”
- Prof. Jane Ohlmeyer, Trinity
College Dublin
“The
collaboration enabled
the access to various courses
and conferences.”
- Dr. Cristina Staub, Service
Sans Soucis
“Insights
from more than
one place...Two bits of
information together are more
powerful than separately and may
help solve real-world problems.”
- Dr. Isabel Fletcher, The
University of Edinburgh
“You
learn to know people.
You learn to know yourself, your
limits, how much work you can handle.
You learn to say “no”, when it’s not possible.
And, you learn to be involved with others,
that’s a key issue.”
- Dr Elio Shijaku, University of
Barcelona
“There’s
a very big gap
between doing something
for someone, or doing things
together and just discussing
things together.”
- Dr. Karolina Pircs, Lund
University
15
“There
are some unwritten
rules for collaborations in
different cultures and you can’t
fulfil them if you don’t know them.
You have to discover those rules
through conversations.”
- Dr. Zsuzsa Kovács, Eötvös
Loránd University
“I’ve
learned a huge
amount about a completely
new area which has been really
good fun! [...] It has allowed me to
diversify potential funding streams.”
- Prof. Peter Nellist, University
of Oxford
“Throughout
my career, I can say
that the most fruitful moments of
collaborations have been unorthodox
formats like writing retreats, so everybody
goes away for three or four days.”
- Prof. Stéphanie Hennette-Cachez,
University Paris Nanterre
“You
also have to feel
that this is something that
is beneficial for both partners.
We get resources and possibilities
to do other things. They also get a
relevance and have the possibility to
be in another context.”
- Prof. Fredrik Tufvesson, Lund
University
“Usually
international
collaborations have higher
impact and have been shown to be
more citable.”
- Prof. Sir Peng Tee Khaw,
University College London
“Perhaps
most difficult things in
collaborations are both the personal
and methodical challenges: conceptual
confusion can easily arise, whereas you both
have to be clear with the other as well as flexible
enough to keep a proper working relationship.”
- Dr. Anniek de Ruijter, University of
Amsterdam
“We
do science not
because we are paid a lot
of money for it, but because we
actually enjoy it. And this includes
people. So don’t make your life more
difficult working with people you don’t
like and find another way.”
- Prof. Dr. Burkhard Becher,
University of Zurich
“Researchers
should follow their
interests. Ask themselves: ‘Who
are the people at the edges of those
disciplines that I could pull together?’
Develop an idea over a period of time and
write a grant proposal.”
- Dr. Keven Mitchell, Trinity College
Dublin
“The
most important
thing is to value the
contribution of everyone,
because progress sometimes comes
in unexpected ways, from unexpected
people.”
- Prof. Michele Vendruscolo,
University of Cambridge
16
Top Tips
For
more advice,
seek out mentors
and support services
1
Be open, visible and actively search for opportunities
2
Choose partners wisely (personally and professionally)
3
Choose a small number of collaborations and commit effort and time to them
4
Establish a joint vision from the start
5
Clarify the benefits for yourself and your collaborators
6
Find a common language and ask questions
7
Develop a clear sense of your role and responsibilities
8
Develop resilience and patience; don’t take things personally
9
Appreciate other ways of researching
10
Be prepared for changes and endings in the project
17
Do It Yourself
The advice in this guide was gathered through over 50 interviews
with experienced researchers from a wide range of disciplines
and countries who were all happy to talk to doctoral researchers
about their work. We hope this encourages you to have similar
conversations with researchers in your own area of interest. To help,
here are the questions our authors used.
1. Please state your name, current position and University
2. Please can you briefly describe your current research focus
3. What has been the value of collaboration to your career and your research?
4. What has been challenging about collaborating with others?
5. What did you do to help your collaborations be successful?
These could include examples around trusting partnerships, shared goals and visions, communication,
management systems, handling of conflicts or use of support services within your university.
6. What did you learn from your experiences?
7. Any particular advice you have for PhD students on how to get started?
Additional questions that were not included in the interview protocol, but authors found useful to ask.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
How do you measure the success of a collaboration?
What have you learnt from collaborations that have failed, and what would you do differently?
How do you remain resilient when collaborations fail despite signficant investment of time and effort?
How does funding influence how you start a collaboration and its scope?
What have you done to help young researchers start a collaboration?
Reflecting on past collaborations, how did your view of collaboration evolve?
Do you have specific advice for underrepresented academics (gender, disability, social background, race/
ethnicity)?
How do you say NO to collaboration opportunities without jeopardising the connection?
How do you address conflicts when they emerge?
What advice can you offer PhD students on how to handle conflicting messages from more senior individuals
within the collaboration network?
Can universities do more to foster early career collaboration?
How do you end a collaboration?
We hope that this guide gives you the confidence to ask the researchers around you for their advice and
encouragement for research collaborations.
18
Acknowledgements
Interviewees
Prof. Agnieszka Rothert, University of Warsaw
Prof. Andrew Patrizio, The University of Edinburgh
Dr. Anniek de Ruijter, University of Amsterdam
Prof. Dr. Burkhard Becher, University of Zurich
Prof. Carol Brayne, University of Cambridge
Prof. Catherine Lyall, The University of Edinburgh
Dr. Charlotte Ribeyrol, Sorbonne University
Dr. Cristina Staub, Service Sans Soucis
Dr. Elio Shijaku, Universitat de Barcelona
Prof. Dr. Els Stronks, Utrecht University
Dr. Esteve Fernández, Universitat de Barcelona
Dr. Eszter Voroshazi, IMEC, Leuven, Belgium
Dr. Frédéric Suffert, Institut National de la Recherche
Agronomique
Prof. Fredrik Tufvesson, Lund University
Prof. Guda van Noort, University of Amsterdam
Dr. Isabel Fletcher, The University of Edinburgh
Dr. James Tufano, Charles University in Prague
Dr. Jan Šnajder, Sveučilište u Zagrebu
Prof. Jane Ohlmeyer, Trinity College Dublin
Dr. Janko Jankovic, University of Belgrade
Prof. Jenny Taylor, University of Oxford
Prof. Jérôme Meizoz, University of Lausanne
Prof. Dr. Johannes Glückler, Ruprecht-KarlsUniversität Heidelberg
Dr. Karoliina Snell, University of Helsinki
Dr. Karolina Pircs, Lund University
Prof. Dr. Kerstin Stahl, University of Freiburg
Dr. Kevin Mitchell, Trinity College Dublin
Prof. Dr. Laura Bieger, University of Groningen
Dr. Leonardo Tondo, Harvard University
Dr. Makoto Miyara, Sorbonne University
Dr. Malu Gatto, University College London
Prof. Mario Dell’Agli, University of Milan
Prof. Mark Rehkämper, Imperial College London
Dr. Marta Costa, University of Cambridge
Dr. Melanie Waldenberger, Helmholtz Zentrum
München
Prof. Michele Vendruscolo, University of Cambridge
Dr. Nici Zimmermann, University College London
Dr. Nollaig Bourke, Trinity College Dublin
Dr. Olivier Schwander, Sorbonne University
Prof. Sir Peng Tee Khaw, University College London
Prof. Peter Nellist, University of Oxford
Dr. Rebecca Brauchli, University of Zurich
Dr. Ross Puves, University of Zurich
Prof. Sampsa Hautaniemi, University of Helsinki
Dr. Sara Sattin, University of Milan
Dr. Simon Smith, The University of Edinburgh
Prof. Stéphanie Hennette-Vauchez, University Paris
Nanterre
Dr. Thomas Langer, University of Milan
Dr. Wendy Symes, University of Birmingham
Prof. Yuri Volkov, Trinity College Dublin
Dr. Zsuzsa Kovács Eötvös Loránd University
Speakers, The University of Edinburgh
Mr. Alan Campbell
Prof. Catherine Lyall
Prof. Chris Ponting
Prof. Chris Speed
Ms. Claire Pembleton
Mr. Dominic Tate
Prof. Ian Underwood
Ms. Imogen Johnston-Menzies
Ms. Jessie Fubara-Manuel
Ms. Katey Warren
Ms. Kerry Miller
Prof. Melissa Terras
Dr. Rod Mitchell
Dr. Sam Staddon
Dr. Sara Shinton
Mr. Stuart Dunbar
Mr. Stuart Easter
Organising Committee
Antony Maciocia
Emily Woollen
Helen McMillan
Jennifer Riley
Sara Shinton
Sarah Thomas
19
Notes
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
20
21
If you require this document in an alternative format, such as large print or a coloured background, please
contact Sarah Thomas (Sarah.Thomas@ed.ac.uk), Communications Officer, Institute for Academic Development