From the treaties the city state Novgorod concluded in the 14th century with its Scandinavian neighbours, Sweden in 1323 and Norway in 1326, together with a Norwegian border delimiting note (before 1330), we know that north of the...
moreFrom the treaties the city state Novgorod concluded in the 14th century with its Scandinavian neighbours, Sweden in 1323 and Norway in 1326, together with a Norwegian border delimiting note (before 1330), we know that north of the respective sedentary populations the northern part of Fennoscandia constituted a vast shared territory - a Common (Alminding/Erämaa), where agents of these populations had overlapping and mutually accepted interests in exploiting the riches of the territory, including taxation of and trade with the local Saami populations. Thus the Novgorodian taxational rights extended to Tromsø on the Atlantic coast, the Norwegian rights to the southern White Sea coast of the Kola Peninsula. From other sources we know that the Swedes and their agents among the Finns taxed the Saami in the interior of Northern Fennoscandia. This situation did not change during the next two centuries although the border of sedentary populations in the south gradually but slowly moved northwards and eastwards.
By the mid-16th century, at a time when war in the Baltic region obstructed Russia's trade with the West through the Baltic Sea and the Danish Sound, the Arctic Coast suddenly became a political hot spot. English and Dutch merchant sailors had just re-discovered the route north of Norway and the Kola Peninsula to the Russian market. The affected governments now considered trade along the Arctic route taxable, as it had been at the Sound, and the amount of tax to be levied depended on the length of the coastline the ships had to pass. Consequently it became of paramount importance to lay claim to as much of the coastline as possible and to exclude competitors.
However since the treaties of the 14th century Norway had more or less become a vassal state of Denmark and Novgorod had been conquered outright by the Muscovite state. Therefore decision making concerning the new situation at the Artic Coast had moved from local authorities in Norway and Novgorod to Copenhagen and Moscow. Here officials were unfamiliar with the concept of shared sovereignty as well as overlapping taxational borders.
The paper focuses on the schizophrenia that arose when officials in the Muscovite Chancery of Foreign Affairs (posol’skii prikaz) tried to square the information they received from their collector of the Lapp-tax and their firm belief that borders in the region had to a fixed line. This led them 1) to duplicate the Norwegian town/fortress Vardø 2)that an otherwise unknown Polna River in the vicinity of Varanger Fjord constituted the fixed border between Muscovy and Norway.
With regard to 1) see,
https://www.academia.edu/8974739/The_Tsars_Patrimony_And_the_Duplication_of_Vardø_Vargav_Borders_at_the_Arctic_Ocean_and_Levels_of_Information_in_the_Late_Middle_Ages_and_Early_Modern_Times
2)
https://www.academia.edu/37052483/Lind_Polna_Rivers_and_Russias_Medieval_Borders_with_the_Scandinavian_West.pdf