Quantum Cosmology

The discussion of the Theory of EVERYTHING has been continued with a concerted interest on physicality, and in particular, the concept of Dark Matter and consciousness embodiment, making a reference to the advent of Core Manifestation Body Template or concept of Morphogenetic Field. It is elucidated that contrary to the erroneous conjecture of the mainstream science, Dark Matter is not just something that is only simply responsible for gravity. Indeed, it is true that Dark Matter epitomizes what ‘holds’ everything together in physicality. Yet, Dark Matter is not just regular matter that is only indigenous to 3D physicality, nor is “dark” by any means, both in terms of its Light quotient and frequency of vibration. Dark Matter manifests itself as plasma waves that has a spectral density that begins from highly comparatively lower constitution, and thus, high Light quotient and frequency of particulate (as well anti-particulate) vibration, all the way making the fabric of the to the 81st space-time dimension, to that of our Harmonic Universes, as well as forming our consciousness embodiment. Indeed, it is better to altogether dispense with the terminology of “Dark” and replace it with “Stealth” matter. In fact, Dark Matter is the essence or the substance of what emerges from the eternal spirit of the God-SOURCE. And, Dark Matter epitomizes what constitutes and builds the layers of our Lightbody that, in turn, give rise to the formation of our material atomic body. Thus, the Dark Matter body may be viewed as the connection link that exists between the eternal spiritual Light SOURCE body of the Prime Creator and the finite level of our Light source body. The Core Manifestation Body is governed by the Dark Matter Template, the blueprint or the instruction sets that our Eternal Source Particle Atoms and Molecules are built in order to generate the layers of our Eternal Light Body determining our bioenergetics, in turn, giving rise to our morphogenetic field that forms the DNA and RNA structure of our genetics. And, all this entails is the conversion of energy into matter. Dark Matter Template holds a cell that has the instruction set for the Elemental Body that is specific to the matter substance that is connected to a specific Harmonic Universe (e.g., HU1, HU2, HU3, and even HU4), and thus, provides the very means for our very consciousness embodiment. Note that quantum field affects the organization of the
Space-time or ‘dimensions,’ which in turn, determines the structure of the timelines that forms the Nebadon Time Matrix that defines our 4 holographic Harmonic Universes. This is what is commonly referred to as the 12D Grid or Tree of Life, the blueprint matrices of the Time Matrix that make up the layers of the Morphogenetic Fields of the Earth, as a macrocosm, and in turn, us, as the microcosm that determine our Consciousness reality and evolution. This establishes a system of communication that connects and realigns Earth and its planetary Light body structure via certain portals and stargates to the rest of the Cosmos, something that may be described as ‘holographic geography,’ the geometric intelligence that connects all the star systems in our local universe to the surface grid of our planet. Note that any changes in the Dark Matter Template Body (the ‘Rasha Body’), signifies a shift occurring in our physical body and physicality. And, in turn, any change in our orientation in matter, signifies a change in the fabric of space-time dimension to which our consciousness is anchored. Accordingly, a review of our quantum consciousness embodiment structure within the Nebadon Universe that may be classified under the concepts of ‘Soul Aspects,’ ‘Soul Expression,’ ‘Oversoul,’ and ‘Avatar’ matrix that was initially depicted by the ‘Carousel-Wheel of Consciousness’ by the author, is re-articulated, herein. Finally, a brief discussion of the relevance of magnetic energies discharge to the Planetary Dark Matter Body Template and the nature of the subtle energies, as well as Gravity, Black-White Holes, and Wormholes has been presented.

Part I – Spirilla Theory and Cosmology
Stephen Hawking once proclaimed that String Theory may be able to unify the various forces although later he became disillusioned thinking that there may be no Theory of Everything. This very condensed book pulls together the various forces into the Spirilla Theory which supersedes String Theory and introduces the Relativity of Consciousness.

The foundation of the Spirilla Theory is based on the writings of H. P. Blavatsky, A. B. Bailey, and A. Besant. By overlaying the works of Einstein, Bohm, de Broglie, Dirac, Bell and other great scientific minds, on top of the foundation, the unification of the various forces and theories starts to appear; each field of study supplying a part of the puzzle but only a holistic view of ALL endeavors will solve the mystery. The book starts by laying the groundwork through the Introduction, a review of Bell’s Theorem and p-adic mathematics; following this, each major section begins with a quote from the foundational works followed by the quotes from scientific papers demonstrating the current known thinking on the various topics; no attempts are made to edit the works (except with a few exceptions for clarity and/or length) of the various authors and references to the scientists’ works are maintained. Each section is pulled together so that a picture can be seen.
This section;
1. Redefines the atom with the addition of a subquark;
2. Defines the Spirilla Theory which unifies Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity, and explains Quantum Entanglement;
3. Defines new particles;
4. Redefines time and space;
5. Defines and solves the mystery of Black Holes and links the cosmic and quantum black hole through the spirillae;
6. Delves into the mystery of the Macroverse;
7. Outlines the steps in the origins of the universe;
8. Adds an equation to Einstein’s original 1905 paper on relativity which sees the speed of light approaching infinity;
9. Gives the foundation for developing space travel; and, as an appendix,
10. Gives detailed information for the development of a new energy source – Quantum Energy.

Part II - Ontology, Epistemology & Manifestations
Part II is divided into three sections:
1. Ontology and the fundamental concepts of reality which discusses:
a. consciousness and delves into the mystery of human consciousness having cosmic origins;
b. reincarnation and gives the various laws affecting rebirth, with a discussion on the principle of mutation and the perfecting of form;
c. the work of form-building, transmutation of form and the building of a human form.
2. Epistemology which covers a great deal of topics however; for the purposes of NOE the subject is restricted to;
a. evolution including a definition of the Law of Evolution, the cyclic ebb and flow and the rhythmic work of creation, the process of substitution, the evolution of man and the genesis of the pithecoid stocks; and
b. death including the processes of death, two main reasons for cremation and the sequence of events at death.
3. Manifestations of the various religions including:
a. why Christians don’t believe in reincarnation;
b. the coming science of invocation and evocation;
c. Quantum Entanglement Over Time (QEoT) or The Law of Cause and Effect, and The Law of Karma with a discussion on The Golden Rule ; and
d. The New World Religion.

Общество и политика Соціальна роль NFT -0535

Discourse analysis and semiotic analysis of culture. Moving from contemporary to nft. Definition of the phenomenalist, his mistakes and perspectives.

PS/ Это моя  последняя довоенная статья о культуре Украины. Предчувствие войны дискурсов горожанина и университета..

PS/ This is my last pre-war article about the culture of Ukraine. Premonition of the war between the discourses of the city dweller and the university..

https://syg.ma/@andrei-khanov/sotsialna-rol-nft

It is argued that string theory predicts unified field theory rather than general relativity coupled to matter fields. In unified field theory all the objects are geometrical, for strings the Kalb-Ramond matter field is identical to the asymmetric part of the metric except that the fields contribute to different sides of the field equations. The dilaton is related to the object of non-metricity.

Results. For signals near the detection threshold, our low-latency algorithms often localized simulated GW burst signals to tens of square degrees, while neutron star/neutron star inspirals and neutron star/black hole inspirals were localized to a few hundred square degrees. Localization precision improves for moderately stronger signals. The correct sky location of signals well above threshold and originating from nearby galaxies may be observed with ~50% or better probability with a few pointings of wide-field telescopes.

Thus, the following possibilities:
a) It applies “The absolute Coordinate system and the absolute Time of the Universe”
as in
“Appendant Document 2, from November 16, 2015”
described.
b) This “Absolute Time of the Universe” is set for Earth.
c) A spaceship in the visible universe can observe the fixed time, which is set on earth.
Technical details need not to be described here.

This results in:

A Real Absolute Coordinate System and a real Absolute Time of the Universe

Making use of the classical Binet's equation a general procedure to obtain the gravitational force corresponding to an arbitrary 4-dimensional spacetime is presented. This method provides, for general relativistic scenarios, classics expressions that may help to visualize certain effects that Newton's theory can not explain. In particular, the force produced by a gravitational field which source is spherically symmetrical (Schwarzschild's spacetime) is obtained. Such expression uses a redefinition of the classical reduced mass, in the limit case it can be reduced to Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation and it produces two different orbital velocities for test particles that asimptotically coincide with the Newtonian one. PACS: 04.25.Nx, 95.10.Ce, 95.30.Sf. Keywords: Universal gravitational law, perihelionshift, Schwarzschild potential, reduced mass.

This is an introductory set of lecture notes on quantum cosmology, given in 1995 to an audience with interests ranging from astronomy to particle physics. Topics covered: 1. Introduction: 1.1 Quantum cosmology and quantum gravity; 1.2 A brief history of quantum cosmology. 2. Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity: 2.1 The 3+1 decomposition; 2.2 The action. 3. Quantisation: 3.1 Superspace; 3.2 Canonical quantisation; 3.3 Path integral quantisation; 3.4 Minisuperspace; 3.5 The WKB approximation; 3.6 Probability measures; 3.7 Minisuperspace for the Friedmann universe with massive scalar field. 4. Boundary Conditions: 4.1 The no-boundary proposal; 4.2 The tunneling proposal. 5. The predictions of quantum cosmology: 5.1 The period of inflation; 5.2 The origin of density perturbations; 5.3 The arrow of time.

AbstractThe work extends the A. Connes’ noncommutative geometry to spaces withgeneric local anisotropy. We apply the E. Cartan’s anholonomic frame approachto geometry models and physical theories and develop the nonlinear connectionformalism for projective modulespaces. Examples of noncommutative generationof anholonomic Riemann, Finsler and Lagrange spaces are analyzed. We alsopresent a research on noncommutative Finsler–gauge theories, generalized Finslergravity and anholonomic (pseudo) Riemann geometry which appear naturally ifanholonomic frames (vierbeins) are defined in the context of string/M–theoryand extra dimension Riemann gravity..Pacs: 02.40.Gh, 02.40.-k, 04.50.+hMSC numbers: 83D05, 46L87, 58B34, 58B20, 53B40, 53C07 Contents 1 Introduction 22 Commutative and Noncommutative Spaces 42.1 Algebras of functions and (non) commutative spaces . . . . . . . . . . . 52.2 Commutative spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82.3 Noncommutative spaces . . . . . ....

The principle of equivalence in gravitational physics and its mathematical base are reviewed. It is demonstrated how this principle can be realized in classical electrodynamis. In general, it is valid at any given single point or along a path without selfintersections unless the field considered satisfies some conditions.

Quantum entanglement, a term coined by Erwin Schrodinger in 1935, is a mechanical phenomenon at the quantum level wherein the quantum states of two (or more) particles have to be described with reference to each other though these particles may be spatially separated. This phenomenon leads to paradox and has puzzled us for a long time. The behaviour of entangled particles is apparently inexplicable, incomprehensible and like magic at work. Locality has been a reliable and fruitful principle which has guided us to the triumphs of twentieth century physics. But the consequences of the local laws in quantum theory could seem "spooky" and nonlocal, with some theorists questioning locality itself. Could two subatomic particles on opposite sides of the universe be really instantaneously connected? Is any theory which predicts such a connection essentially flawed or incomplete? Are the results of experiments which demonstrate such a connection being misinterpreted? These question...

The main purpose of the report is to provide some argumentation that three seemingly distinct approaches of 1. Giveon, Kutasov and Seiberg (hep-th/9806194); 2. Hemming, Keski-Vakkuri (hep-th/0110252); Maldacena, Ooguri (hep-th/0001053) and 3. I. Bars (hep-th/9503205) can be investigated by applying the mathematical methods of integral geometry on the Lobachevsky plane, developed previously by Gel'fand, Graev and Vilenkin. All these methods can be used for finding the transformations, leaving the Kac-Moody and Virasoro algebras invariant. The near-distance limit of the Conformal Field Theory of the SL(2, R) WZW model of strings on an ADS3 background can also be interpreted in terms of the Lobachevsky Geometry : the non - euclidean distance is conserved and the Lobachevsky formulae for the angle of parallelism is recovered. Some preliminary technique from integral geometry for inverting the modified integral representation for the Kac- Moody algebra has been demonstrated.

Andrei Khanov
16:04, 15 December 2020
58
Part eleven. Euclidean, non-Euclidean, matrix (quantum or informational) geometry of the universe.
Part ten. Einstein's lambda term and the quantum mechanical gap experiment.
Part nine. Planck universe. The Planck system of units is the forerunner of the matrix of physical quantities, more precisely, the matrix of human ideas about physical quantities.
Part eight. Reality and uncertainty. Let me repeat briefly what was discussed in the previous seven chapters. Along the way, I'll add explanations if they were not in the article itself. Nature, the universe, life - can be characterized (by a person, this is due to the structure of his thinking) - a continuous and indefinite quantum mechanical wave function - WF. In a philosophical context, WF is Being, in the esoteric context it is Tao, the Platonic world of ideas, in the poetic language of Aristotle - “the ether of the authenticity of human utterances, from which the sphere of fixed stars is woven, the personification of which is God”, physically it is a vacuum. Reality, in the mind of the observer, is the collapse of such a function - by this or that frame of reference. Therefore, there are many points of view or frames of reference.
Part seven. Matrix of physical quantities (continuation).
Part six. Neural network of physical quantities. Information universe.
History and perspectives of quantum mechanics. Part three
Part four. A cosmological odyssey of the lambda term.
Part five. Matrix and neural network.

in the text - an error, instead of G = G '/ (F = 1) = v4 / F = s2 / mt2. read G = G '/ (F = 1) = v4 / F = s3 / mt2.

The well-known Regge-Wheeler equation describes the axial perturbations of Schwarzschild metric in the linear approximation. From a mathematical point of view it presents a particular case of the confluent Heun equation and can be solved exactly, due to recent mathematical developments. We present the basic properties of its general solution. A novel analytical approach and numerical techniques for study the boundary problems which correspond to quasi-normal modes of black holes and other simple models of compact objects are developed.

It is imperative "now" to go beyond our anthropological limits, through an upright mental position, which I have called Conscious Evolutionary Consciousness PaleontoLogicaMente ISOCIC.  It is necessary to get out from under Einstein's skirts and finish the work he courageously started but left unfinished.

As I commented several times, trying to attract the attention of the unconscious to be unconscious, therefore nicknamed inCoScientists, is about time to step forward - evolutionary forward - with respect to Einstein’s “happiest thought”.

What causes the wave formation of the reality / particle duality to collapse is the interference of the same "conscious measurement" which absurdly does not want to take into account itself.  This can be done "simply" by accepting relativity without distinction between inertial and accelerated mass in an "infinitely accelerated" hypersphere of the universe as it is now accepted where any ray has the same number of points before any inertial observer "all about all "consciously conscious instantly entangled" causing "the collapse of the formation of the waves of reality.

Viktor T.Toth on QUORA

What is the simplest and easiest to understand way to explain how mass increases with velocity?

The simplest way: Mass does not increase with velocity.

Seriously. Mass does not increase with velocity.

When you move relative to an object (remember: motion is always relative, so an object moving relative to you or you moving relative to that object mean literally the same thing) that object does not change. It does not even know that you are moving relative to it. However, in your frame of reference, it is that object that moves, and as a result, it has kinetic energy as calculated by you. (For another observer, moving along with the object, the object is at rest and has zero kinetic energy.)

Some authors, especially in the older literature, combined this kinetic energy and the rest mass-energy of the object into a quantity called relativistic mass.

This quantity is meaningless. It differs for different observers moving at different speeds relative to the object. It really has no practical use whatsoever. It only confuses people, rather badly, about relativity theory.


Geoffrey Edwards on QUORA


As velocity increases the mass of the object increases in a linear fashion until infinite energy is required to move an infinite mass. Is time dilation a result of the gravitational field generated by the mass of the object?

No. Mass does not increase. The momentum of an object increases with velocity like this:

p = \gamma*m*v

where p is the usual letter for momentum and \gamma is the relativistic gamma factor. Early on, people noticed that you could absorb the gamma into the m, call it ‘relativistic mass’ (M = gamma*m) and recover the usual Newtonian relation:

p = Mv

As well, this mass had the usual property that if you pushed on the object along the direction of motion with force F you got an acceleration a = F/M. However, this particular analogy probably started to die when people first calculated the acceleration induced by a transverse force and found that it was NOT F/M.

Most analogies about relativity are fundamentally bad ideas because they explicitly break the fundamental basis of relativity, which is that intrinsic velocity, if it exists, cannot be measured. The mass of an object is what we would measure in the frame of reference of an object. It has to be invariant with velocity - a so called ‘scalar’. The orbits of the planets around the sun, for example, cannot depend on the sun’s motion through space (else we could use the orbits to measure the sun’s intrinsic velocity).

Most analogies have limits and are useful only inside those limits. The limit of this particular analogy is to simplify a single question …

If I apply an external force F along the line of motion of an object with velocity v, what is the acceleration?

… and that is it. The mass does not really increase. Because of this, the concept of relativistic mass has been discarded by pretty much everyone because it is invariably applied outside its domain of applicability.

E imperativo “ora” andare oltre i nostri limiti antropologici, tramite una stazione eretta mentale, che ho chiamato coscienza evolutiva cosciente PaleontoLogicaMente ISOCIC. Occorre uscire da sotto le sottane di Einstein e finire il lavoro da lui coraggiosamente iniziato ma lasciato incompiuto.

Come ho più volte commentato cercando di attirare l'attenzione dell'inconscio, essere inconsci, quindi soprannominati inCoScientists, è giunto il momento di fare un passo avanti - in avanti evolutivo - rispetto al "pensiero più felice" di Einstein.

Che fa collassare la formazione d’onda della dualità realtà/particelle è l'interferenza della stessa “misurazione cosciente” che assurdamente non vuole tenere conto di se stessa. Questo può essere fatto "semplicemente" accettando la relatività senza distinzione tra massa inerziale e accelerata in un'ipersfera dell'universo "infinitaMente accelerato" come è ora accettato in cui qualsiasi raggio ha lo stesso numero di punti prima di qualsiasi osservatore inerziale "tutto su tutto" coscientemente cosciente istantaneamente impigliato "  causando” il collasso della formazione delle onde della realtà.

Viktor T.Toth su Quora

Qual è il modo più semplice e facile da capire per spiegare come la massa aumenta con la velocità?

Il modo più semplice: la massa non aumenta con la velocità.

Sul serio.  La massa non aumenta con la velocità.

Quando ti muovi rispetto a un oggetto (ricorda: il movimento è sempre relativo, quindi un oggetto che si muove rispetto a te o tu che ti muovi rispetto a quell'oggetto significa letteralmente la stessa cosa) quell'oggetto non cambia.  Non sa nemmeno che ti stai muovendo rispetto ad esso.  Tuttavia, nel tuo sistema di riferimento, è quell'oggetto che si muove e, di conseguenza, ha energia cinetica calcolata da te.  (Per un altro osservatore, muovendosi insieme all'oggetto, l'oggetto è fermo e ha energia cinetica zero.)

Alcuni autori, specialmente nella letteratura più antica, combinarono questa energia cinetica e l'energia massa a riposo dell'oggetto in una quantità chiamata massa relativistica.


Questa quantità è priva di significato.  Differisce per diversi osservatori che si muovono a velocità diverse rispetto all'oggetto.  Non ha davvero alcuna utilità pratica.  Confonde solo le persone, piuttosto gravemente, sulla teoria della relatività.


Geoffrey Edwards su Quora


All'aumentare della velocità, la massa dell'oggetto aumenta in modo lineare fino a quando è necessaria un'energia infinita per spostare una massa infinita.  La dilatazione del tempo è il risultato del campo gravitazionale generato dalla massa dell'oggetto?

No. La massa non aumenta.  La quantità di moto di un oggetto aumenta con la velocità in questo modo:

p = \gamma*m*v

dove p è la solita lettera per la quantità di moto e \gamma è il fattore gamma relativistico.  All'inizio, le persone hanno notato che potevi assorbire la gamma nella m, chiamarla "massa relativistica" (M = gamma*m) e recuperare la solita relazione newtoniana:

p = Mv

Inoltre, questa massa aveva la solita proprietà che se si spingeva sull'oggetto lungo la direzione del moto con forza F si otteneva un'accelerazione a = F/M.  Tuttavia, questa particolare analogia probabilmente iniziò a scomparire quando le persone calcolarono per la prima volta l'accelerazione indotta da una forza trasversale e scoprirono che NON era F/M.

La maggior parte delle analogie sulla relatività sono fondamentalmente cattive idee perché rompono esplicitamente la base fondamentale della relatività, che è che la velocità intrinseca, se esiste, non può essere misurata.  La massa di un oggetto è ciò che misureremmo nel quadro di riferimento di un oggetto.  Deve essere invariante con la velocità - un cosiddetto "scalare".  Le orbite dei pianeti attorno al sole, ad esempio, non possono dipendere dal movimento del sole nello spazio (altrimenti potremmo usare le orbite per misurare la velocità intrinseca del sole).

La maggior parte delle analogie ha dei limiti e sono utili solo all'interno di quei limiti.  Il limite di questa particolare analogia è semplificare una sola domanda...

Se applico una forza esterna F lungo la linea di movimento di un oggetto con velocità v, qual è l'accelerazione?

... e basta.  La massa non aumenta davvero.  Per questo motivo, il concetto di massa relativistica è stato scartato praticamente da tutti perché è invariabilmente applicato al di fuori del suo dominio di applicabilità.

It will be argued here that the cosmological constant problem exists because of the way the vacuum is defined in quantum field theory. It has been known for some time that for QFT to be gauge invariant certain terms--such as part of the vacuum polarization tensor--must be eliminated either explicitly or by some form of regularization followed by renormalization. It has recently been shown that lack of gauge invariance is a result of the way the vacuum is defined, and redefining the vacuum so that the theory is gauge invariant may also offer a solution to the cosmological constant problem.

All fields of the standard model and gravity are unified as an E8 principal bundle connection. A non-compact real form of the E8 Lie algebra has G2 and F4 subalgebras which break down to strong su(3), electroweak su(2) x u(1), gravitational so(3,1), the frame-Higgs, and three generations of fermions related by triality. The interactions and dynamics of these 1-form and Grassmann valued parts of an E8 superconnection are described by the curvature and action over a four dimensional base manifold.

This technical note describes a simple mathematical-geometrical solution for unifying the four fundamental forces in nature. The fundamental forces of gravitation, electromagnetism, strong force, and the weak force are actually different aspects of the same force. In general, the relationship between the four forces can be described using a form of the equation for Analog Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (Analog-QAM). This equation form is developed utilizing the concept of a “blinking” or discrete physical universe. The approach to develop the solution is described by minimizing the number of available dimensions (zero), which is in contrast to numerous efforts (String theory, M-theory, Quantum gravity) that attempt to maximize the number of  dimensions under consideration. An Electrical Universe (EU) model is presented that provides sufficient conditions for a solution. This mathematical solution should be tested against experimental data to confirm its validity, however it is noted that, “discrete-time” forces will be measured differently than “time-averaged” forces in a laboratory environment.

Confirmation of the theory is suggested through small, discrete-time interval measurements of the gravitational acceleration force and the Electromagnetic Force, where they will be seen to vary continuously, and yet also retain a “time-averaged” value. Each reader must comprehend that our entire universe literally blinks, off and on, more than 1 trillion times every second.

Free or low-cost Author's ebooks on: RLighthouse.com, Amazon.com, Vixra.org, Lulu.com, BarnesandNoble, Google Play, Kobo, Scribd, AngusRobertson, Rakuten.jp, Fnac, Draft2Digital, and other websites.

De la science normale à la science marginale. Analyse d'une bifurcation de trajectoire scientifique: le cas de la Théorie de la Relativité d'Echelle Résumé. Dans le champ scientifique, les agents peuvent choisir de collaborer à la science 'normale', se placer à l'avant-garde la plus légitime (les 'supercordes', la 'matière noire', etc.), ou encore développer leurs recherches dans un nouveau cadre théorique, avec tous les risques que cela comporte. La marginalité d'une théorie soulève la question de la stratégie de ceux qui y collaborent même au détriment de leur 'intérêt' à court terme, qui oriente plutôt vers la compétition immédiate pour occuper les positions centrales dans les domaines déjà constitués. La théorie de la relativité d'échelle (TRE) présente l'intérêt d'une telle situation car elle ouvre une possibilité qu'il faut créer de toutes pièces. S'y investir engage davantage que le choix d'un projet 'risqué ' (par sa difficulté même) dans le cadre d'un paradigme existant car, d'une part, la TRE innove par rapport aux bases conceptuelles déjà acceptées par tous et, d'autre part, se trouve aussi marginalisée par rapport à l'avant-garde la plus légitime (comme celle des 'supercordes'). Ainsi, le cas de la TRE permet d'étudier une région du champ scientifique peu explorée par une sociologie des sciences qui fixe surtout son regard sur les cas extrêmes: histoire de théories devenues reconnues ou controverses spectaculaires.La TRE occupe encore, en 2006, une position marginale dans le champ de la physique. Son statut diffère toutefois radicalement des 'théories' produites à l'extérieur du champ, sans correspondre pour autant à celui de la science stabilisée et sanctionnée: comme nous allons le montrer par une analyse bibliométrique détaillée, sa diffusion au sein du champ scientifique est relativement modeste mais réelle, et ses résultats, quand ils reçoivent la sanction d'une publication scientifique, sont rarement pris en compte par les chercheurs qui n'y collaborent pas déjà. Cette

A superluminal quantum-vortex model of the electron and the positron is produced from a superluminal double-helix model of the photon during electron-positron pair production. The two oppositely-charged (with Q = ±e sqrt (2/α) = 16.6e) open-helix spin-½ half-photons compose the double-helix photon. These half-photons separate and curl up their separated superluminal single-helical trajectories to form an electrically-charged superluminal closed-helix spin-½ quantum-vortex electron model and a corresponding positron model. The helical radius and the Dirac equation's zitterbewegung angular frequency of the quantum vortex electron and positron models equal the helical radius and zitterbewegung angular frequency of the two spin-½ half-photons, each of energy E = mc^2 , that composed the double-helix photon model of energy E = 2mc^2 from which the electron and positron models were produced. The photon and electron models are also compatible when a photon of energy E > 2mc^2 produces a relativistic electron-positron pair. Implications of the quantum vortex electron model for electron stability are discussed.

Movement/propagation through the “Dark Matter”:
Effects the surrounding by propagation through “Dark matter” particles creating “waves” in a manner similar to a Ship/boat moving in water creating waves

When two ships/boats (in our case two objects) move in parallel (in 4th dimension) to each other in the same direction, they experience a lateral pressure due to which the ships/boats tend to come closer to each other. This is explained by Bernoulli's theorem. This greater lateral pressure forces the ships/boats to come closer to each other and they may even collide
In our case the ships/boats are any aggregate of “Atoms” – any kind of an object
The “Sea” is the “Dark Matter”
Bernoulli's theorem is named after Daniel Bernoulli

Based upon the idea of vacuum quanta, the paper proposes a model for the action of the gravitational force. This hypothesis offers a mechanistic theory of the local curvature of space-time and it leads to an explanation of the expansion of the universe.

I argue that the Carroll-Chen cosmogonic model does not provide a plausible scientific explanation of the past hypothesis (the thesis that our universe began in an extremely low-entropy state). I suggest that this counts as a welcomed result for those who adopt a Mill-Ramsey-Lewis best systems account of laws and maintain that the past hypothesis is a brute fact that is a non-dynamical law.

The concepts “science” and “religion” are both products of modernity.  “Religion” took on its present meaning in the seventeenth century, “science,” during the nineteenth.  An understanding of the social and historical processes which have led to the formation of the dual categories “science” and “religion” is vital for any assessment of their current relationship.  In each instance, the formation of the category came about through a process of reification which shifted the focus of attention away from the relevant human activities to abstract bodies of knowledge or sets of propositions.  This has led to a distorted understanding of the phenomena which these terms purport to represent, a distortion which is magnified in discussions of their putative relationship.  The constructed nature of the science-religion relation suggests the need for revision of standard approaches to the science and religion question.

Abstract
Paper hypothesis. 
- There's a light beam its velocity (1.16 mkm/) moves in parallel to Mercury Motion.

Paper Hypotheses Explanation
- Planet Motion be a cover for a light motion found behind. The light motion uses Planet motion data for its own motion.
- The hypothesis creates one more universe in parallel to the universe of matter. And by that, The Planets be similar to ships sail over a sea. But the sea is light motions network.
- The hypothesis uses Mercury Motion as a examination point to prove that a motion of a light beam its velocity (1.16 mkm/s) be behind Mercury Motion. 
- The light motion causes to create the solar system distances in a network form and depends on one geometrical design. Because of that, the solar system distances analysis will prove the light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Paper Conclusion
- The Solar System Distances Be Created in a network form and depend on one geometrical design which proves that these distances be created by a motion of a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/sec.
Paper Objective
- The paper proves The Light Supposed Velocity (1.16 mkm/sec) Existence.
- This proof disproves automatically Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity. 
- Because
- The sun rays velocity = 300000 km/sec.
- Where
- The solar system distances prove that they are created by a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/sec.
- means,
- The sun light velocity (300000 km/) is created as a side product from the light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s),
- means
- The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion
- Which disproves Decisively Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department-  Physics & Mathematics  Faculty

This Impact Report identifies and summarises the diverse impacts, resulting from the £500m of UK funding of Science and Technology in 2013, using numerous quantitative metrics and short case study extracts.  It shows how the varied impacts of a national science and technology organization and its many funded programmes can be annually identified, captured, tracked, and summarised in a public document.

The report was produced for, and by, the Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) -  the UK Research Council responsible for funding: (1) all UK astronomy, particle and nuclear physics research, (2) related UK science and technology facilities (e.g. as Harwell and Daresbury), (3) the UK contribution to international science (e.g. CERN, international telescopes and space missions), (4) innovation and business spin-off programmes, and (5) UK public engagement activities.

The Report was co-researched and co-authored by the STFC Impact Team, including myself while Impact Evaluation Manager in 2013, with Dr. Claire Dougan-McCallie (lead author/Head of Impact) and Jenny Beard, with additional input from senior managers, and many data and case study contributions from other key managers across STFC.

Varied key impacts are identified and reported including:

• Research amongst the best (by citation impact) in astronomy, nuclear and particle physics.
• Supported research of 226 Principal Investigators in 70 universities, led to 1,100 peer-reviewed papers in 2012.
• Facilities (the Diamond Light Source, ISIS and CLF) were used in 2012/13 by over 4,200 unique users , in over 2,400 experiments, producing over 1,000 papers in peer-reviewed journals.

• Technology from CERN benefited the UK economy by over £100 billion every year.
• Funding the development of the UK’s space, internet and computer animation industries, returned over £500 billion to the UK economy per annum.
• Funded Innovation Campuses hosted over 230 enterprises and supported over 5,000 jobs.
• UK industry won £43 million in contracts from the international subscriptions funded, and had accumulated a total of £150 million since 2005.

• Funded research inspired future generations to study STEM subjects, attracting 90% of UK undergraduates to study physics, funded 782 PhD students  and 16,800 student training days.
• Between 2009 to 2012 public engagement programmes engaged people on 58 million occasions, with 2 million people engaged in face-to-face activities in 2013 alone.

The Feynman propagator used in the conventional in-out formalism in quantum field theory is not a causal propagator as wave packets are propagated virtually instantaneously outside the causal region of the initial state. We formulate a causal in-out formalism in quantum field theory by making use of the Wheeler propagator, the time ordered commutator propagator, which is manifestly causal. Only free scalar field theories and their first quantization are considered. We identify the real Klein Gordon field itself as the wave function of a neutral spinless relativistic particle. Furthermore, we derive a probability density for our relativistic wave packet using the inner product between states that live on a suitably defined Hilbert space of real quantum fields. We show that the time evolution of our probability density is governed by the Wheeler propagator, such that it behaves causally too.

Ensoulment is a cosmological perspective that integrates personal, interpersonal, collective and cosmic dimensions which allows us to connect with our soul and the Soul of the World. Ensoulment consist of 24 primary gateways, sacred letters and symbols. Through Ensoulment we learn to embody our soul and decipher her symbols and to understand how our soul’s cosmology is weaving herself through “Particles of Experience”. Every person, every mineral, every plant, every living being, animated or not, has a soul that is imprinted with their very own unique cosmology. Realizing and living one’s cosmology is fundamental to fulfilled, abundant and meaningful existence. 

In this article, I describe how to use Ensoulment for healing, healing of the mind- body and spirit. Having used ensoulment for the last 10 years with hundreds of clients I witnessed significant physical -emotional and mental long lasting transformation in my life and in client's life. This article is written in Hebrew, I welcome collaboration on the English translation.  Thank you and Enjoy. Natalie