ENG SUMMARY (text práce slovenčina): In the present monograph Notes on the Trickster as a Literary Character in the Archnarratives (Thematic and Cultural Contexts), we used a transcultural and heterogeneous genre sample of...
moreENG SUMMARY (text práce slovenčina):
In the present monograph Notes on the Trickster as a Literary Character in the Archnarratives (Thematic and Cultural Contexts), we used a transcultural and heterogeneous genre sample of archnarratives, and through intertextual and intercultural confrontation tried to describe the constitutive principles of depicting a mischievous figure of a trickster, which appears in the religious-mythological notions of each civilization and cultural circle in a wide range of possible representations and renditions. As mentioned in the introduction to the present work, the trickster is a distinctive and unmistakable figure, which is difficult to grasp due to his ambiguous and variable character. Based on the initial analysis, we believe that this archetypal figure is defined by the following universal properties:
- absence of internal development as a literary character,
- ambivalence,
- cunning,
- liminality,
- power of transformation,
- comic-grotesque poetics.
The above properties also condition the structure of the underlying trickster narrative/thematic algorithm: the way literary characters appear on the scene and the definition of their character (exposition) → the trickster causes a conflict by his jokingly fraudulent actions → the trickster escapes from the "crime scene" (exodus). Based on the research of our textual material, we found that the sujet formula in a trickster narrative branches into four variants, i.e. separate modes with their own logical-content sujet scheme: civilizer (cosmology), user (body and corporeality), fool (sacred category), scamp (satirical-eschatological principle). From a purely linguistic point of view, we can view the listed functions as information-saturated sememes with a distinctive and complex structure of rendering, and the archfigure of a trickster as an abstract archetypal semantic theme. In brief, let us summarize the basic profiles/definitions of individual functions. The trickster – civilizer is a functional type appearing mainly in etiological, anthropogonic and cosmological myths. Through his deceptive and unpredictable actions, he brings culture and civilizational achievements to the people. Especially in the natural archaic communities, he semantically intersects with other ancient figures – the ancestor and the demiurge – and it is sometimes difficult to distinguish whether he is a human or an animal. Conversely, in cultures with a more developed constitutional state-building institution, where the totemic hypostasis is not so strong, he is usually a (semi)god with a body, or imago homo, who usually only has the function of a cultural hero. The trickster – civilizer function differs most distinctively from other functions and it is easy to identify. In order to label the trickster in a story as a civilizer, the story must take place in the so-called mythical age of the birth of the world and, and a certain progressive or regressive cosmological/civilizational change must be evident at the end of the sujet, which the trickster causes (often accidentally). In the trickster – user typological-character function, the trickster appears as physically lustful and dissatisfied, which results in the strictly libido-driven to instinctively animalistic motivation for his actions. It is most evident on the motivic plane of sexuality and hunger/digestion. For the trickster to satisfy his desires for food and sexual intercourse, he uses various tricks, illusions and lies. The poetics of the stories about the trickster – user is thus conveyed on the level of grotesque obscenity, the Dionysian principle of physical and spiritual boundlessness, chaoticism and (excessive) abundance. His crazy and instinctive actions, metamorphic hyperbolic play with the body and travestion of bodily manifestations in the sense of Bakhtin's natural physiologism come to the fore, and the line between the (potent) body and the world, life and death, vitality and old age is completely blurred. This also relates to the fact that the trickster – user maintains a residual connection with the ancient cults of the phallus and fertility, i.e. the mysteries of death and rebirth. The user function is often present as an ancillary function alongside a (dark) civilizer, because he often causes fundamental changes in the universe through his libido behavior. The trickster – fool function is related to the spiritual, supernatural and/or mystical world. He is personified by divine entities as the bearers/legislators of the ideal concept of "higher theological-social truth", which evoke a feeling of unattainability, anxiety and fear. The fool is able to maintain a sacred fragile contact with the sacred sphere, and it is this subtle communication that causes his different and strange behavior, which the uninitiated (ignorant, unconscious) usually explain as foolishness. In this context, folly is perceived as a stigmatized result of understanding of a kind of higher mystery (initiation mystery), which is sent by the supernatural beings and is otherwise inaccessible to the common man. Under the influence of divine inspiration, the fool controversially criticizes the sinfulness of man and the bodily and material aspects of the world, which is always semantized as something imperfect, impure and inferior in various religious currents and mythological ideas. However, the fool's criticism has a deeper spiritual message – his intention is to correct man and society in an effort to return to the original religious ideals and authentic renewal of the concept of the sacred in the profane world. The trickster – scamp typological-character function is an instrument of folk (collective) criticism directed against the system sanctified by tradition, i.e. the structure of the universe. As the name itself suggests, the trickster plays with other literary characters, makes mischievous jokes about them, makes fun of their shortcomings, and decoronizes and travests the secular and religious authorities. His critique, however, has no deeper (spiritual, mystical) meaning. The aim of the trickster as a satirical mocker is to humiliate the object of his ridicule as much as possible. This fact is to some extent also reflected in the genological line: the fool mostly appears in magical fairy tales and hagiographic legends, while the trickster – scamp is found mainly in the fairy-tale subgenres with realistic and humorous themes, satirical tales or allegorical short stories. Since the scamp often denounces gluttony and promiscuity as socially undesirable human qualities, the boundary between the trickster – scamp and trickster – user can often be blurred, especially if the trickster appears as an animal. However, if a particular story thematizes gluttony and sexual intercourse in didactic and moralizing ways, we are certainly dealing with the mischievous function of a scamp. The typological-character functions (modes) are not isolated; on the contrary, they are organic components of the complex archetype of a trickster, which represents one of the basic existential semantic themes of human survival. Through the various forms of expression and universal narrative images typical for the respective typological-character functions, it communicates with the recipient at the level of laughter folk culture and/or picaresque mythology. Finally, we can add that the individual functions of the trickster archetype are an important instrument in the effort to classify an otherwise difficult-to-grasp and ambiguous literary character of a trickster in a particular story.