Unified Field Theory

It is argued that string theory predicts unified field theory rather than general relativity coupled to matter fields. In unified field theory all the objects are geometrical, for strings the Kalb-Ramond matter field is identical to the asymmetric part of the metric except that the fields contribute to different sides of the field equations. The dilaton is related to the object of non-metricity.

Dans la théorie du “réseau cosmologique” qui est présentée dans ce livre, le problème de l’unification des théories physiques et de la recherche d’une Théorie du Tout est traité d’une manière radicalement différente des autres approches de la littérature. Au lieu d’essayer de construire une théorie unifiée en bricolant un assemblage de théories existantes, en les rendant de plus en plus complexes et ésotériques, en ajoutant même d’étranges symétries et des dimensions supplémentaires pour leur “beauté mathématique”, on part exclusivement des concepts classiques les plus fondamentaux de la physique, qui sont l’équation de Newton et les deux premiers principes de la thermodynamique. Et à l’aide de ces principes fondamentaux, et en développant une géométrie originale basée sur les coordonnées d’Euler, on en vient, par un cheminement purement logique et déductif, à suggérer que l’Univers pourrait être un cristal, un réseau cubique tridimensionnel élastique et massif, et que les éléments constitutifs de la Matière Ordinaire pourraient être des singularités topologiques de ce réseau cristallin. Sur la base de ce concept original, on peut développer une description très complète de l’évolution spatio-temporelle de ce réseau cubique solide, que l’on appelle le “réseau cosmologique”, en introduisant dans un espace absolu infini un observateur purement imaginaire appelé le Grand Observateur GO. Si cet observateur est équipé d’un système de référence composé d’un référentiel euclidien absolu orthonormé pour localiser les points du réseau solide et d’une horloge absolue pour mesurer l’évolution temporelle du réseau solide dans l’espace absolu, une description très détaillée de l’évolution spatio-temporelle du réseau peut être élaborée sur la base du système de coordonnées d’Euler. Dans ce système de coordonnées, le Grand Observateur GO peut décrire de manière très détaillée les distorsions (rotations et déformations) et les contorsions (flexion et torsion) du réseau. En introduisant les principes physiques de base de la dynamique newtonienne et des deux principes de la thermodynamique, il est capable de décrire l’évolution spatio-temporelle du réseau cosmologique, en lui attribuant une masse d’inertie par cellules de base et une énergie interne spécifique de distorsion par unité de volume du réseau. Et il peut également introduire des singularités topologiques (dislocations, désinclinaisons et dispirations) sous forme de boucles fermées dans ce réseau cosmologique, en tant qu’éléments constitutifs de la matière ordinaire. Lorsque cette idée originale est développée en détail, il peut être démontré, par un cheminement mathématique purement logique et déductif, que, pour un réseau isotrope élastique satisfaisant à la loi de Newton, avec des hypothèses spécifiques sur ses propriétés élastiques, le comportement de ce réseau et ses singularités topologiques satisfont “toute” la physique actuellement connue, en faisant spontanément ressortir des analogies très fortes et souvent parfaites avec toutes les grandes théories physiques actuelles du macrocosme et du microcosme, telles que les équations de Maxwell, la relativité spéciale, la gravitation newtonienne, la relativité générale, la cosmologie moderne et la physique quantique. Mais cette théorie ne se contente pas de trouver des analogies avec les autres théories de la physique, elle propose également des explications assez originales, nouvelles et simples à de nombreux phénomènes physiques qui sont encore assez obscurs et mal compris à l’heure actuelle par la physique, comme la signification profonde et l’interprétation physique de l’expansion cosmologique, l’électromagnétisme, la relativité spéciale, la relativité générale, la physique quantique et le spin des particules. Il offre également des explications nouvelles et simples de la décohérence quantique (la limite de passage entre un comportement classique et un comportement quantique d’un objet), de l’énergie sombre, de la matière noire, des trous noirs, et de nombreux autres phénomènes. Le développement détaillé de cette théorie conduit également à des idées et des prédictions très innovantes, parmi lesquelles la plus importante est l’apparition de la charge de courbure, qui est une conséquence inévitable du traitement d’un réseau solide et de ses singularités topologiques en coordonnées d’Euler. Ce concept n’apparaît pas du tout dans toutes les théories modernes de la physique, telles que la relativité générale, la physique quantique ou le modèle standard, alors que dans notre théorie, ce concept fournit des explications pour de nombreux points obscurs de ces théories, tels que la force faible, l’asymétrie matière-antimatière, la formation des galaxies, la ségrégation entre matière et antimatière au sein des galaxies, la formation de trous noirs gigantesques au cœur des galaxies, la disparition apparente de l’antimatière dans l’Univers, la formation d’étoiles à neutrons, le concept de matière noire, la nature bosonique ou fermionique des particules, etc. Enfin, l’étude de réseaux présentant des symétries spéciales appelées symétries axiales, symboliquement représentées par des réseaux cubiques 3D “colorés”, nous permet d’identifier une étonnante structure de réseau dont les singularités topologiques bouclées coïncident parfaitement avec la zoologie complexe de toutes les particules élémentaires du Modèle Standard, et qui nous permet également de trouver des explications physiques simples aux forces faibles et fortes du Modèle Standard, y compris les phénomènes de confinement et de liberté asymptotique.

This paper summarizes how a new approach to the Universe based on the existence of a "crystalline ether", which has recently been detailed in the third versions of two books [1], makes it possible to find a simple, unified and coherent explanation of all the theories of modern physics and of the Universe. The basic concepts of this approach can be summarized as follows: (i) the support of the Universe is a form of "crystalline ether" which consists of a solid and massive lattice, of facecentered cubic structure, with the simplest possible elasticity, and in which matter is represented by the set of topological singularities of this lattice (loops of dislocations, disinclinations and dispirations), and (ii) this lattice exclusively satisfies, in absolute space, the basic classical physical concepts that are Newton's law and the two principles of thermodynamics. With these basic classical concepts alone, we show that it is possible to find all the modern theories of physics, namely that the behaviors of this lattice (the Universe) and its topological singularities (the Matter) satisfy electromagnetism, special relativity, general relativity, gravitation, quantum physics, cosmology and even the standard model of elementary particles.

In the Standard Model, the problem of anomalous magnetic moments is only half-resolved. Proponents always say that prediction of the electron's magnetic moment; confirmed by measurement is the most accurate prediction in all of physics, but it came after the fact. The truth is: Dirac got close and Schwinger closed it. Yet finally, the anomalous magnetic moments of the proton and neutron (and even the electron) remain poorly explained.  The problem of anomalous magnetic moments is explained by equilibrium resonance theory,  all anomalies well answered, and with a connection between context and event.

Dans cette brève communication, nous résumons comment une nouvelle approche de l’Univers, qui a été récemment exposée en détail dans deux livres, permet de trouver une explication simple, unifiée et cohérente de l’ensemble des théories de la physique moderne.
Les concepts de base de cette approche peuvent se résumer simplement de la manière suivante: (i) le support de l’Univers est une forme d’«éther» qui consiste en un réseau solide et massif, avec une élasticité la plus simple possible, et dans lequel la matière est représentée par l'ensemble des singularités topologiques de ce réseau (boucles de dislocations, de disclinaisons et de dispirations), et (ii) ce réseau satisfait exclusivement, dans l'espace absolu, les concepts physiques classiques de base que sont la loi de Newton et les deux principes de la thermodynamique.
Avec ces seuls concepts de base tout-à-fait classiques, on retrouve toutes les théories modernes de la physique, à savoir que les comportements de ce réseau (l’Univers) et de ses singularités topologiques (la Matière) satisfont à l’électromagnétisme, la relativité spéciale, la relativité générale, la gravitation, la physique quantique, la cosmologie et même le modèle standard des particules élémentaires.

Since the end of the 18th century scientists have pondered over, what is today, one of the most exotic and mysterious objects in the universe. The mathematical definition of a black hole is a direct consequence of Einstein's Theory of General Relativity, which predicts a theoretical singularity with infinite density. There have been many studies over the years that look to correcting the uncertainties within the current black hole model, however there has been no major theoretical or mathematical breakthrough that develops our knowledge of what a black hole truly is. This study presents an alternative structure to the current understanding of a black hole by applying the underlying principles of the Time Compression Theory. The new structure eliminates the presence of a singularity and results in an extremely dense mass, named the 'black sphere'. Infalling and distant observers are introduced which shows that the processes of spaghettification and compressional redshift are equivalent to today's understanding, and evidence of time dragging and ripples in time replace the notions of frame dragging and gravitational waves. The Time Compression Theory is an innovative concept, whose applications have the possibility to change the global perception of black holes. Future studies will use this structure to describe spiral galaxies and dark matter, and the same principles can be used within quantum mechanics - providing evidence for the first unified theory.

Note: It is highly recommended that readers have an understanding of the basic principles of the Time Compression Theory given in [1], before progressing.

Ce papier résume comment une nouvelle approche de l’Univers basée sur l’existence d’un «éther cristallin», qui a été récemment exposée en détail dans les troisièmes versions de deux livres [1], permet de trouver une explication simple, unifiée et cohérente de l’ensemble des théories de la physique moderne et de l’Univers. Les concepts de base de cette approche peuvent se résumer de la manière suivante: (i) le support de l’Univers est une forme d’«éther cristallin» qui consiste en un réseau solide et massif, de structure cubique à faces centrées, avec une élasticité la plus simple possible, et dans lequel la matière est représentée par l'ensemble des singularités topologiques de ce réseau (boucles de dislocations, de désinclinaisons et de dispirations), et (ii) ce réseau satisfait exclusivement, dans l'espace absolu, les concepts physiques classiques de base que sont la loi de Newton et les deux principes de la thermodynamique. Avec ces seuls concepts de base tout-à-fait classiques, on montre qu’il est possible de retrouver toutes les théories modernes de la physique, à savoir que les comportements de ce réseau (l’Univers) et de ses singularités topologiques (la Matière) satisfont à l’électromagnétisme, la relativité spéciale, la relativité générale, la gravitation, la physique quantique, la cosmologie et même le modèle standard des particules élémentaires.

La conexión afín representa el elemento geométrico más primario, del que derivan todas las otras magnitudes que caracterizan a una determinada geometría. En este artículo se estudia el concepto de conexión afín, sus propiedades y las magnitudes que de ella se derivan, así como algunas de las conexiones que se han utilizado en teorías físicas. Se investiga la relación entre la conexión afín y el tensor métrico. Todo este estudio se encuentra dirigido a su aplicación en teorías de la gravedad alternativas a la Teoría General de la Relatividad y en las teorías de campo unificado.

This book is a comprehensive presentation of the main topics of contemporary Theoretical Physics : the Geometry of the Universe and Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Mechanics and momentum, Force Fields and gravitation, Nuclear Particles and Nuclear Fields, Stable systems, discontinuous processes and Bosons. Starting from the concepts of Physics it shows how the representations introduced in the last 70 years such as  spinors and gauge fields can be used to build a consistent Theoretical and Unified Theoretical Physics, encompassing all the known phenomenon, from elementary particles to stars systems, without the need for exotic interpretations, such as additional dimensions or particles. The book introduces new mathematical tools, which are documented in a substantial appendix.

Einstein Cartan Evans (ECE) unified field theory is an extension of the original Einstein Hilbert gravitational field theory of 1915 to all radiated and matter fields. This allows the systematic investigation of the mutual interaction of gravitation and electromagnetism (EMG coupling) and allows the development of a generally covariant quantum field theory in which the wave-function is the tetrad. The

The first two attempts to derive a unified field theory as an extension to general relativity were made by Weyl and Kaluza. The main idea was to develop a geometrical model whereby both gravity and electromagnetism emerged naturally from the same curved space-time continuum. Over the years, each of these attempts has engendered one of the main groupings of classical (non-quantum) unified field theories. Weyl sought to alter the geometry of the continuum while maintaining the number of dimensions at four. Kaluza sought to maintain the geometry of the continuum, but account for electromagnetism by altering the number of dimensions to five. It is generally believed that Kaluza’s was the first five-dimensional model of material reality and that it was largely ignored by the scientific community except for Klein’s attempt to use the model as a basis for quantizing relativity, but the model does have a separate history independent of Klein’s modification.  The mere assumption of a five-dimensional space-time structure can take two basic forms, both of which are not as independent of the other as one would expect or hope. First of all, the five-dimensional space-time may be used as a mathematical formalism alone, which has no more meaning than to allow for the extra variables needed to incorporate the electromagnetic field into a single space-time structure. In this manner, the fifth dimension is assumed to have no physical meaning. It was this form that Kaluza’s theory assumed so Kaluza’s original model merely duplicated Maxwell’s electromagnetic model without adding any new physics. In the second type of these theories, the fifth dimension is given an actual physical reality. It is a basic necessity of this type of theory to explain why the fifth dimension seems to be beyond the natural experience of human perception.

The concept of a physical field was perhaps the single most important innovation in physics of the nineteenth century, but it has never before been recognized in these or similar terms and very little research has ever been conducted on the historical development of the concept. Newtonian absolute space had seemed necessary for theoretical mechanics a century earlier, but it was insubstantial and thus needed some form of aether to carry forces across the vastness of between interacting material bodies. However, the concept of absolute space was not without problems since all of practical and applied mechanics seemed to depend only on relative space. As physics advanced the concept of aether seemed to take on a bigger and bigger role, but the absolute space that seemed to require aether for substantiation took on less and less of a role in physics. The field concept, on the other hand, only required relative space and offered only a limited substantiality. Within this context, Faraday invented the concept of field to explain electricity and magnetism. At first, the field was thought to carry magnetism along magnetic lines of force, but the concept was extrapolated to cover electric forces. Changes in the mathematical concepts used to describe gravitational interactions, such as Gauss’ theory of gravity, also implied that the field concept better fit the gravity situation then did some form of aether filling an absolute space. But it was to Faraday that all credit for developing field theory must go because he and he alone invented the concept and incorporated it into the physics of electromagnetism. Yet even Faraday’s ideas on the field were influenced by the work of earlier thinkers, especially Roger Boscovich, but the extent to which Faraday’s discovery depended on his precursors is open to debate. L. Pearce Williams’ argues for a more direct link between Faraday and Boscovich, but P.M. Heimann and other’s criticisms are also discussed whenever it is appropriate. Since the main question considered is the importance and extent of Boscovich’s influence on Faraday, only the earlier part of Faraday’s career is covered. This would represent the period up to the mid 1840’s.

The quantum [Planck scale] geometrics underpinning the mathematics of physics - 'squared' numbers in quantum theory are revealed to be equilateral Planck energy momenta geometries - affording a geometric reinterpretation of quantum theory to facilitate the creation of unified quantum field theory of Everything

The golden ring to which most physicists aspire is a unified field theory that incorporates all of modern and classical physics. Some scientists and others call this a TOE or ‘theory of everything’, but it is no more than false hubris to believe that humans could possibly know and explain everything about the universe at this time. Einstein chased this goal for the last three decades of his life, basing his theoretical research on his general theory of relativity. Meanwhile, the vast majority of scientists supporting the other major accomplishment of the Second Scientific Revolution were investing all of their time and efforts to advancing the quantum theory and their quest has been extremely successful. They originally had no interest in a unified field theory. After Einstein died in 1955, his efforts were all but abandoned because of his philosophical stance against the prevalent Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum theory even though he had been one of quantum theory’s founders. During the 1970s the tables started to turn and quantum theorists became interested in unifying physics, although not from the foundational principles of relativity theory. They claimed that quantum theory was more fundamental than relativity so they began the same quest from a totally different direction despite their claims to be continuing Einstein’s quest.  Throughout the development of the ensuing standard quantum model, superstring theory and many other theoretical schemes, quantum theorists have remained resolute in their conviction that the quantum and relativity are mutually incompatible so the quantum must completely do away with and replace relativity once and for all. However, the quantum theory and relativity are not actually incompatible and, in fact, say the some of the same things about the nature of physical reality. When the similarities are fully defined and studied and the basic assumptions behind each of the theories are altered to reflect the similarities instead of the incompatibilities, only then can the point of their compatibility be determined and act as a unifying principle resulting in a completed unified field theory of the type that Einstein once sought. The development of this physical model of reality is not without irony. Not only is the quantum theory incomplete as Einstein argued in EPR, but Einstein’s general relativity is also seriously incomplete and true unification cannot be rendered complete at any level of reality until all the theoretical models being unified are themselves complete.

Quantum field theory applied to the electromagnetic field describes all physical phenomena involving electrons and photons , and is called quantum electrodynamics, abbreviated QED.  Stuart, Takahashi, and Umezawa (1978; 1979) propose a mechanism of human memory and consciousness consistent with quantum field theory which they have called quantum brain dynamics (QBD).  They go on to describe a theory in which the polarization of water molecules plays an exceptional part, and on the macro level produces a single resonant water "macromolecule" in bodies of living, water based creatures. Within this polarized, non-local H2O quantum field is embedded an electromagnetic field in the form of a plasma  field.

Science is a work in progress, although the progress that science has made over the past few decades has been vastly limited by the narrow, limited and dogmatic worldviews representing the major paradigms of physics. It is not hard or even overwhelmingly original to conclude that science has followed the wrong direction at a fork in the road and led itself into a corner with little to no room for escape. Both the quantum theory and general relativity have made spectacularly accurate predictions, nearly all of which have been verified, but these two paradigms remain mutually incompatible while the standard model of particles used within the quantum paradigm keeps predicting the existence of particles that are not falsifiable and completely beyond verification. Newer physical models such as the superstring and brane theories have not lived up to their promise and show no signs of settling the problems of unification for which they were designed. This book takes a different route and tells the story of a new form of unified field theory that combines or merges the best parts of the quantum theory and relativity together within a single field theory structure. It covers four primary areas of scientific inquiry: the macrocosm, the microcosm, the everyday world of life, mind and experience, and the abstract world of theoretical and philosophical mathematics and science. In so doing, this book offers the best chance for an alternative physics worldview that is nothing less than the science of our future, a preview of the science that will carry us into a brave new world of being and becoming our own future.

Keywords: Future physics, theory of everything, unified field theory, quantized space-time, consciousness, evolution, paraphysics

This paper explains the magnetic effect of the electric current from the observed effects of the accelerating electrons, causing naturally the experienced changes of the electric field potential along the electric wire. The accelerating electrons explain not only the Maxwell Equations and theSpecial Relativity, but the Heisenberg Uncertainty Relation, the wave particle duality and the electron’s spin also, building the bridge between the Classical and Quantum Theories. The changing acceleration of the electrons explains the created negative electric field of the magnetic induction, the electromagnetic inertia, the changing relativistic mass and the Gravitational Force, giving a Unified Theory of the physical forces. Taking into account the Planck Distribution Law of the electromagnetic oscillators also, we can explain the electron/proton mass rate and the Weak and Strong Interactions.

If the Biofield is a true physical field, it must be fundamental to the very structure of physical reality, but the Biofield (LIFE or that which goes beyond the normal biologically explained living system) does not have a specific force associated with it as do other physical fields. Life evolved from chemical reactions that depended upon the four natural forces which were already in place before life evolved, so there must be more to LIFE than these simple known physical forces. LIFE (the Biofield) has the structural qualities of a field, but it is passive, not dynamically active like gravity, electricity and magnetism, so LIFE is either a structural entity or a fundamental construction within the very fabric of physical reality. Under these circumstances, LIFE (the Biofield) can be equated to the matter/energy field in a type of quantized space-time continuum, MIND to the corresponding electric field and CONSCIOUSNESS to the resulting magnetic field. The Biofield must be a product or an extension of if not a specific structural configuration within a five-dimensional single unified field that combines gravity and electromagnetism. As such, the Biofield can be easily described by a modified Einstein-Kaluza five-dimensional model that describes our experiential quantized space-time continuum.

The causal relationship between cymatic pattern and Hindu-Yantra exposes the essential pattern underlying the universe. Phenomena that confirm this blueprint are convergent evolution, stigmergy (swarm-intelligence), chaos/complexity theory, exaptation, gestalt, Plato’s-problem and perhaps even sympathetic magic.
The unified-field and collective unconscious are the same; science explains the metaphysical. Ancient Yantra-Mandalas catalogue the morphology of the unified-field.
Cross-referencing quantum theory, biologist Rupert Sheldrake, Carl Jung and media-analyst Marshall McLuhan reveals this new Gestalt. Symbols are the keys to understanding reality. Systems Theory is an important new paradigm.

Since Einstein died in 1955, very few theoretical scientists have tried to complete his work because the pendulum of history has swung toward favoring field theories based on the quantum for the expected unification of physics. Nearly everyone now believes that the quantum (discrete point) and relativity (continuity) are incompatible and the quantum is more fundamental than relativity and continuity, so those who have sought unification have looked for new and unique quantum approaches to accomplish unification. However, the truth is that the quantum and relativity are not incompatible and the traditional differences between the two–discreteness and continuity, indeterminism and determinism–are just the outward appearances of an even deeper fundamental problem–geometric point and extension–that when solved renders relativity and the quantum completely compatible. This deeper problem is even more significant because Riemann knew of and failed to consider and even purposely ignored the problem of point-elements and based his differential geometry of surfaces on metric-elements alone. Therefore, expanding the Riemannian geometry to include point-elements, which can be interpreted as discrete points for the quantum, forms a fundamental enough foundation for developing a unified field theory.

*Note: Due to the length of this project, to avoid any potential formatting issues, please 'DOWNLOAD' this paper instead of 'PREVIEWING'.*
This project aims to propose a kind of alternative spiritual model that analyzes ancient Vedic philosophy alongside modern science. Many abstract and metaphysical concepts are described here, thus an addendum with visuals and explanations, as well as a glossary of Sanskrit terms, is provided at the end of this paper for your convenience. Energy concepts from both fields of study, such as energetic subtle bodies, the mantra OM as the creation of the universe, cymatic experiments, string theory applications, intentional thinking, and sacred geometry are all discussed to illustrate how all of these energy concepts, when unified, have the ability to help us understand our place within the universe and how to properly interact with it, without letting it overcome us unknowingly.
According to the theories presented in this project, the universe is fundamentally made up of a landscape of vibrating energy. This energy vibrates at different frequencies. Within each frequency, there is a set of intrinsic information in the form of sacred geometric patterns. These geometric patterns are the language of existence. This energy that is within all matter and all beings interacts with and has a physical effect on all other matter. These energetic frequencies are all around us and are even a part of us, whether we are aware of it or not. Most importantly, considering that our thoughts are electrical impulses, or energy, our thoughts then must also have the ability to interact with our perceived existence to a certain extent.
Thus, with these energetic understandings in place, it is possible to infer that our thought patterns may play a role in our quality of life as well as our perceived physical realities. We are very much in control of our thoughts, which, consequently, direct our attitudes and our perceived reality – this responsibility is both liberating and simultaneously terrifying. It's about the awareness of energetic intention.

Gravity was discovered accidentally by Newton after he observed an apple falling from a tree. But what actually is gravity and what is its role in nature? However, gravity remains much of a mystery. We experience gravity and are affected by it all the time, and yet we do not know what it really is except for interpreting it as a force or field. This paper, which is published in an international physics journal, takes on the challenging task of examining gravity and suggesting the possible actual role of gravity in nature, from our macro-world to the micro quantum world, and hence the possible unification of gravity with all the other forces of nature, through two modes of reasoning, namely reasoning by reductio ad absurdum and by analogy. The paper contains preliminary and explanatory materials which lead to the author’s hypotheses in Sections 5 and 6; Section 6 also provides some anecdotal evidence of what gravity is.

Gustav Fechner, the German experimental psychologist, coined the term psychophysics in 1860, publishing the first mathematical equation to model human consciousness.  Fechner assumed that any future approaches to consciousness would include mathematical and physical underpinnings. In 1995, the cognitive scientist and philosopher David Chalmers coined the phrase "the hard problem" as being that of connecting consciousness with some physical substrate.  According to Chalmers, "The really hard problem of consciousness is the problem of experience. Most existing theories of consciousness either deny the phenomenon, explain something else, or elevate the problem to an eternal mystery."  As Chalmers points out, unfortunately, the modern scientific community has not yet produced a model of consciousness supported by mathematics and physics, thus no progress in Fecher's "psychophysics." 
However there is growing interest among the scientific community in string theory, the only branch of mathematical geometry that has successfully explained recent discoveries in high energy particle physics. The mathematical proof of string theory requires the existence of a ten dimensional universe.  But in trying to map consciousness, science continues to limit its data search within time and the three spatial dimensions, ignoring six of string theory's ten dimensions  Perhaps because mainstream science tacitly limits itself to four of the ten dimensions, progress has come to a dead end. Accordingly, the most widely accepted theory among neurophysiologists is that consciousness is somehow a "byproduct" of the electrical sparking of neurons, an accidental epiphenomenon of the activities of nerve-filled wet meat.
This paper considers data beyond the four dimensional constraints of the scientific establishment. It is my contention that many recorded accounts of philosophers, mystics, and shamans can and should be considered as data. My thesis is that these accounts express experience and observation within one or more of the additional dimensions predicted by string theory. Any advance in understanding consciousness must take into account not only the language and domains of mathematics, particle physics, and neurobiology, but also the experiential domains of philosophers and mystics. It is in regarding data from these multiple domains of inquiry that a new model of consciousness will emerge. In this paper I hypothesize a psychophysics of consciousness, woven of strands from mathematics, mysticism, and physics, as well as contemplative participatory practice, to address and solve "the hard problem."

Once the positivistic/escapist interpretation that human consciousness is epiphenomenal, i.e., accidental, is dismissed there are two possible approaches to the scientific study of consciousness. Bottom-up consciousness, from the individual organism or being to the universe, and Consciousness from the top-down, from the universe to the individual. These two approaches mark the outer boundaries of the present scientific search for a theoretical model of consciousness, even though Consciousness goes beyond science and moves into the realm of metaphysics. In any case, everything in between these two approaches is seriously muddled and clouded with speculations and metatheories that cannot be possible, which is common to the period preceding a scientific revolution. Some of those speculations and metatheories sound rather esoteric and even spiritual, which allows them to appeal to many people, but they would normally be considered non-scientific by definition if they were expressed for anything other than consciousness, which in itself presents a total mystery to science and the scientists who are willing to attempt to explain consciousness. On the other hand, what little concrete information science has at its disposal about consciousness does seem to match ideas in eastern mystical thought and in some cases earlier western ideas in Natural Philosophy that have been rejected by science, which further muddles the scientific quest for understanding consciousness. These ideas and concepts fit the qualitative aspects of mind that science normally associates with consciousness even better as well as the direct characteristics of consciousness, at least to the extent that such characteristics are known. Science needs to find a balance between them so it can maximize the effect of the next scientific revolution as well as the corresponding evolutionary leap in consciousness that is coming, but physics must simultaneously develop a working unified field theory to better define the universe in which consciousness of any kind, shape or form can and has developed.

The best evidence presently available for the afterlife has already been tried and found wanting, although there is a great deal of good and various levels of even better evidence when NDEs, reincarnation, new standards for verifying mediumship, death bed visions and other phenomena related to dying and the afterlife are considered. But none of these rises to the level of 'best evidence' for 'proving' the reality of the afterlife. The truth is that there is no falsifiable evidence that can distinguish between the afterlife and other paranormal phenomena, i.e., there are always alternative super-psi or general psi explanations for the data, stories and evidence gathered by parapsychologists and experienced by individuals. The afterlife hypothesis is neither falsifiable nor verifiable given the absolute best 'so-called evidence' available today. Only a valid theory could offer scientific verifiability and also distinguish whether the evidence gathered so far supports the afterlife concept or super-psi. So, with no valid theory of the afterlife available, either an independent acceptable theory based on specific phenomena or better yet as part of a greater comprehensive theory of physical reality, there is nothing on which to base a truly rigorous experiment that could verify the afterlife to the satisfaction of both the scientific and nonscientific communities. Some form of valid acceptable theory is necessary and long overdue to explain and verify the various paranormal phenomena as well as hone the scientific search for survival of consciousness and the afterlife. We must assume that at least consciousness survives as either part or the whole of any possible afterlife. All of the common paranormal examples that deal with the afterlife are in some way simply different data points that should be used to follow the scientific method and lead to some common physical concept that we identify as the afterlife, so the hypothesis can be tested and verified. Not one of these examples is based on anything other than experiences/observations for which no comprehensive scientific model has ever been developed and/or studied in enough detail to even attempt to verify even the minimum level survival of consciousness in some manner. Only one theoretical unification model in modern physics, the single (operational) field theory or SOFT, is comprehensive enough to model life, mind, and consciousness and their evolution in enough specific detail to even talk logically about survival of consciousness. Be this as it may, the only possible 'best evidence' would then be the direct experience of higher consciousness, as in NDEs and enlightenment, which are very personal experiences, but even then, it could only be used as evidence, the best evidence, when it can be analyzed and understood as a physical phenomenon within the context of SOFT, an equivalent or better theoretical model.

Time flows one-dimensionally in human perception. Time flows passively like an arrow from the past, to the present, to the future. It is impossible for human perception of spacetime to go beyond the 4-dimensional spacetime. This passive concept of time also applies to physics. All physics up to now has assumed that time is always one-dimensional. We propose complex time as an active source parameter for all physical quantities. There is phase as a hidden dimension between the two spacetimes, so the phase needs to be considered as another dimension of time. It is known that the relativistic mass of a moving object increases infinitely as it approaches the speed of light. This is valid from the point of view that mass is a scalar quantity, because acceleration leads to an increase in mass. We propose a new point of view that mass is a complex quantity. The point is that acceleration leads to a change in the phase of the mass, not in the magnitude of the mass. The phase of mass was the root cause of relativistic mass, but it was not revealed because mass was considered to be a scalar quantity. Through complex time, we successfully unified electromagnetic force and gravity between two quantum particles in the special theory of relativity. The relationship between time and energy is similar to the relationship between time and frequency. Just as frequency is another aspect of time, energy is another aspect of time. Therefore, mass, charge, energy, and time are equivalent. Electromagnetic force and gravity can be unified as one force, and their source is complex time. Based on this, we expect that we will unify quantum mechanics and general relativity through complex time.

The unified field dynamics of gravitational mass-ENERGY-Matter - uniting Newtonian and relativistic gravity theories through equilateral Planck quanta to reveal the trifold force interactions that create universal gravitation between material objects - and a corrected model of stellar fusion.

A century and a half ago, a revolution in human thought began that has gone largely unrecognized by modern scholars: A system of non-Euclidean geometries was developed that literally changed the way that we view our world. At first, some thought that space itself was non-Euclidean and four-dimensional, but Einstein ended that ‘speculation’ when he declared that time was the fourth dimension. Yet our commonly perceived space is four-dimensional. Einstein unwittingly circumvented that particular revolution in thought and delayed its completion for a later day, although his work was also necessary for the completion of that revolution. That later day is now approaching. The natural progress of science has brought us back to the point where science again needs to consider the physical reality of a higher-dimensional space. Science must acknowledge the truth that space is four-dimensional and space-time is five-dimensional, as required by accepted physical theories and observations, before it can move forward with a new unified fundamental theory of physical reality. 

Keywords: four-dimensional, five-dimensional, space-time, Einstein, Clifford, Kaluza, Kaluza-Klein, magnetic vector potential, electromagnetism, Yukawa potential, expanding universe, general relativity, unification, Superstrings, Branes, Randall-Sundrum

There are probably as many opinions and interpretations of quantum theory as there are physicists and philosophers. The proliferation of so many different interpretations of so important an aspect of modern science as the quantum could be either good or bad for the progress of physics, depending on the scientist to whom you are speaking at any given time. The fact that quantum theory is open to so many interpretations poses serious questions regarding the fundamental nature of the basic concepts behind the quantum. On the other hand, as long as quantum theory continues to yield good results in the laboratory, many scientists are willing to overlook or ignore its fundamental flaws. However, the fundamental problems and flaws which have acted to foster the differing views of the quantum are a real and present danger for the theory itself as well as the present state of physics and science in general. Simple quantum mechanics and its various extensions have dominated theoretical and experimental physics so thoroughly for nearly the last century that any problems with the quantum worldview, whether explicit or implicit, affect all of physics and science. Be this as it may, when scientists consider the quantum theory the most accurate theory ever developed and try to use the quantum theory, as it now stands, as the basis to develop a TOE, they are literally barking up the wrong tree. Physicists need to go beyond the quantum before they can ever hope to achieve any kind of unification between the quantum and relativity, let alone anything resembling a TOE. Yet before they can go beyond the quantum, they must recognize the basic problems and shortcomings with the quantum.

"UKRAY" - UNIFIED FIELD THEORY -
- A New Unification Theory on Electromagnetic Gravitation-

THIS THEORY, GETS THESE QUESTIONS INTO;

- A CHANGE into Gravitational field and field equations, STATIC AND UNIVERSAL GRAVITATIONAL CONSTANTS,
- THE DYNAMICS OF Gravitational field with Combining the Electromagnetics Theory.
- THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT COULD BE EXCEEDED?
- THIS THEORY WAS PREPARED AS A CONSEQUENCE OF APPROXIMATELY 16 YEARS STUDY,
- WHOLE "666" PAGE
- INCLUDES ABOUT 100 THEOREMS,
- AND 1000 ILLUSTRATED DRAWINGS,

I imagined the situation of a mass falling towards the singularity point in a blackhole singularity in electrodynamic gravity conditions for some relative structures in the electromagnetic theory which is the most important and understandable theory in the classical physics I had comprehensive knowledge in my last years of my undergraduate term of the academic life (in about 2000) in an article of Faraday on the topic of the law of induction I had incidentally seen while I was examining the existing physics literature in the faculty's library. I wondered if the law of induction in a circular conducting wire differently perceived according to an observer in the train and the one on the land in the special relativity of Einstein may occur by the increase and decrease of mass during the course of falling to singularity in this blackhole and may create an electromagnetic gravity wave and a magnetic charge current which would decrease the impact of gravitation in parallel to this.

This oriented me to a series of researches to study and create this theory for years and then directed me to create a unified electromagnetic gravity theory composed of SEVEN ARTICLES in total I will submit here in order and step by step. Even though the theory includes a deductive mathematical approach, tensor calculation and geometric modellings, I will give solutions of Einstein-Maxwell Equations with a different mathematical 4×4 Pauli-Dirac Spinors and Tensor calculation construction in direction of closed extra dimension of the space (5 Dimension Effect)

This study which aims to prove that all forces and laws of physics exist in a single unified structure at the Starting and Ending moment of the Universe analyzes all laws of physics within the framework of a unified structure from Newton Mechanics to Quantum Theory, Einstein Relativity to modern 11-dimensional Super string theory. The study may also be considered as a "MODERN ERA PRINCIPIA" since it was started to be written in about 300 years (early 2007) after the publication of the great study of Newton named "PRINCIPIA" (1703-1707) on the topic of gravity theories.

The volume also includes SEVEN CHAPTERS in the form of SEVEN different articles which follow each other and make clear the subject when they are read consecutively. In addition, FOUR additional chapters in the form of APPENDIXES in nature of FUNDAMENTALS OF MATHEMATICS were also included at the end of the volume for readers who have a less degree of technical knowledge about the topic…”

What Does the Theory Tell?
{Short Abstract and Philosophy of the Theory}

The THEORY summarizes the general and simple mathematical description of the universe in the form of general conclusion items and forecasts the followings;

Basic Projections of the Theory?

– NEW MODEL OF AN ATOM,
– NEW MODEL OF THE UNIVERSE,
– CHANGE IN GALILEO Inertia Principle,
– A FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE IN THE STRUCTURE OF MAXWELL's EQUATIONS, AN ADDITIONAL TERMS AND ADDITIONS,
– A CHANGE IN POYNTING ENERGY THEORY,
– A NEW ATOMIC MODEL,
– A NEW UNIVERSE MODEL,
– CHANGE IN GALILEO'S PRINCIPLE OF INERTIA,
– A FUNDEMENTAL CHANGE AND AN ADDITIONAL TERM IN THE STRUCTURE IF MAXWELL EQUATIONS,
– A CHANGE IN STATIC FIELD EQUATIONS OF THE GRAVITY FIELD AND IN THE UNIVERSAL GRAVITY CONSTANT.
– CHANGE IN POYNTING ENERGY THEOREM,
– HOW CAN THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT BE EXCEEDED?

This article proves that the electrostatic and gravitational forces exerted between two electrons are closely related. For example, these two forces can be expressed as related linear and nonlinear effects in nearly identical equations. The vast difference between the electron’s electrostatic and gravitational forces is due to the electron’s wave amplitude term raised to two different powers. This unification was found by adopting John Wheeler’s “quantum foam” model of the quantum vacuum and modeling an electron as a rotating wave in this medium.  This rotating wave model of an electron is shown to achieve an electron’s approximate energy and de Broglie wave characteristics while exhibiting no detectable volume. Also, ħ/2 quantized angular momentum gives this electron model wave-particle duality characteristics. It is possible to go directly to Section 12 (page 16) to see the equations that prove the close relationship between the electron’s gravitational and electrostatic forces.

The first two classical unified field theories were developed shortly after Einstein first wrote about general relativity in 1915. In 1918 Weyl tried to alter the Riemannian geometry but kept the number of dimensions the same and in 1921 Kaluza added an extra dimension but kept the geometry of general relativity intact. These two efforts formed the two classes that later attempts followed. Although Einstein's reputation was growing at this time, his and others' attempts to develop unified field theories were mostly ignored by the scientific community at large, whose interest was drawn more toward the quantum theory. The quantum theory and the negative opinions of Einstein in his waning years were so great that that when this survey was made very few books on the subject were available. Even today, nearly forty years later, very little has been written about these classical unification attempts and almost no work is done in this area.

Many scientists have come to believe that any true unification theory in physics must include a concept of consciousness as well as a model for the mind that interprets the external physical/material world. And, that number is growing. This physical model goes even further. The single field theory includes a physical model of the neural net and explains how mind and consciousness can emerge from the physics of living organisms. Yet it is general enough to assimilate more intuitive models such as Andrews’ 0-D point Void which witnesses and co-creates higher-dimensional Riemannian geometrical realities as well as other more generalized physical models of consciousness to form a truly synergistic model of reality. In other words, physical reality and the consciousness that perceives and interprets that reality both come from the same source, they are co-created at the very beginning of the universe. A singular discrete 0-D point/twist Void emerged within the absolute spaceless-timeless Void of nothingness that preceded everything and through a logical sequence of events produced everything that now exists as our universe. This synergistic model goes well beyond the simple notion of mind and consciousness as mere human bound perceivers and interpreters of the external material/physical world by placing the physical origin of consciousness within every geometrical point in the universe itself. Although consciousness itself is not everywhere in the universe–it is not a property of every bit of matter we observe or event that we detect–the universal will of consciousness to emerge in all forms of life is everywhere in the universe. This physical model clearly demonstrates that the precursors to our experience of consciousness are fundamental elements and active participants in creating the physical world that we perceive and scientifically interpret through the application of physics.