GRASPS Examples
GRASPS Examples
GRASPS Examples
Goal:
Role:
Audience:
Situation:
You need to. show the difference between a balanced diet and an unhealthy diet.
You need to create a brochure that describes helathy vs unhealthy eating and shows at least 2 health problems that can occur as a result of poor eating.
page 1
Goal:
The goal is to create a menu for the 3-day trip to the Outdoor Ed. Center.
Role:
Audience:
Situation:
You need to propose a nutrtionally-balanced and tasy menu, within budfget, for 3 days of camping by the entire class.
Menu plan for three days, including the 3 main meals and 3 snacks (a.m., p.m., and
campfire).
Letter to the director explaining how your menu meets the USDA nutritional guidelines. Include a chart showing a breakdown of the fat, protein, carbohydrates, vitamins,
minerals, and calories. Explain how you made it as tasty as possible.
page 2
Goal:
Role:
Audience:
Situation:
page 3
Goal:
Role:
Audience:
Situation:
page 4
(G.R.A.S.P.S.)
Consider the following set of stem statements as you construct a scenario for a performance task.
Refer to the previous idea sheets to help you brainstorm possible scenarios. (Note: These are idea
starters. Resist the urge to fill in all of the blanks.)
Goal :
Role:
Audience:
Situation:
in order to _________________________________________________________________________
so that ____________________________________________________________________________
page 5
4
accurate
appropriate apt clear convincing correct creative defensible effective efficient
elegant empathetic entertaining justified
4informative insightful novel organized
so that:
page 6
so that:
page 7
4
adjust reflect
upon revise
self assess recognize their habit
4
empathize with imagine
Apply
why/how/that/the/of...
Explain
Interpret
Self
Assess
Shift
Perspective
Empathize
page 8
family member
farmer
filmmaker
firefighter
forest ranger
friend
geologist
government official
historian
historical figure
illustrator
intern
interviewer
inventor
judge
jury
lawyer
library patron
literary critic
lobbyist
meteorologist
museum director/
curator
museum goer
neighbor
newscaster
novelist
nutritionist
panelist
parent
park ranger
pen pal
photographer
pilot
playwright
poet
policeman/woman
pollster
radio listener
reader
reporter
researcher
reviewer
sailor
school official
scientist
ships captain
social scientist
social worker
statistician
storyteller
student
taxi driver
teacher
t.v. viewer
tour guide
trainer
travel agent
traveler
t.v./movie
character
tutor
viewer
visitor
website designer
zoo keeper
page 9
Figure M. 13
Possible Products and Performances
What student product(s) and/or performance(s) will provide appropriate evidence of understanding
and/or proficiency? The following lists offer possibilities. (Remember that student products and
performances should be framed by an explicit purpose or goal and an identified audience.)
Written
Oral
advertisement
audiotape
biography
conversation
book report/review debate
brochure
discussion
collection
dramatization
crossword puzzle
dramatic reading
editorial
interview
essay
radio script
experiment record
oral presentation
historical fiction
oral report
journal
poetry reading
lab report
puppet show
letter
rap
log
skit
magazine article
speech
memo
song
newscast
teach a lesson
newspaper article
play
poem
position paper
proposal
research report
script
story
other: _______________
test
web site
other: _______________
Visual
advertisement
banner
cartoon
collage
computer graphic
data display
design
diagram
diorama
display
drawing
filmstrip
flyer
game
graph
map
model
Power Point show
photograph
questionnaire
painting
poster
scrapbook
sculpture
slide show
storyboard
videotape
web site
page 10
Performance Tasks:
OE
SA
1. self assess the brochure, You are What You Eat
2. self assess the camp menu, Chow Down
3. self assess the extent to which you eat healthy at the
end of unit (compared to the beginning)
Wiggins & McTighe 2008
page 11
Stage 2
Note: there need not be a 1-to-1 correspondence. Some desired results will be
assessed by more than one assessment and vice versa.
Stage 1
For every desired result, you need one or more assessments. Use the sheet below to identify the
corresponding number(s) of each STAGE 1 element next to the assessment(s) designed to provide
evidence of it.
page 12
1. _____ The performance task(s) in Box T is/are aligned with one or more desired
results in Stage 1. The task(s) will yield appropriate evidence of the
identified understanding(s).
2. _____ The task(s) involve(s) a complex, real-world (i.e., authentic) application of
the identified knowledge, skill, and understandings.
3. _____ The task(s) is/are written in the G.R.A.S.P.S. form.
4. _____ The task(s) allow(s) students to demonstrate understanding with some
choice/options/variety in the performances and/or products.
5. _____ The task(s) are not likely to be performed well without a clear grasp of the
understandings the task is meant to assess.
6. _____ The task(s) require(s) one or more of the six facets of understandings.
7. _____ The scoring rubric(s) include(s) distinct traits of understanding and successful performance.
8. _____ The scoring rubric(s) highlight what is appropriate, given the evidence needs
suggested by the Desired Results of Stage 1.
Other Evidence
OE
9. _____ Other appropriate evidence has been identified in summary form (e.g., key
quizzes, exams, student self-assessments, etc.) to supplement the evidence
provided by the performance task(s) .
10. _____ Students are given the opportunity to self-assess and reflect upon their
learning and performance.
Wiggins & McTighe 2008
page 13
Performance Tasks:
A performance task
o Requires transfer i.e. a repertoire of knowledge and skill to be used wisely and
effectively in a new situation - i.e. used with understanding
o Asks students to do the subject, not just recall and plug in discrete learning, out
of context
o Is set in a novel situation, with little or no scaffolding or cues provided: the student
has to think through what the task demands as part of the assessment (the game
vs. the scaffolded and simplified drills)
o should be as realistic as possible, in which students confront the same kinds of challenges, constraints, and options found in the real world
A task, like any other aspect of STAGE 2, is meant to yield evidence of key elements in
Stage 1; it is not meant to be a learning activity: validity is the primary concern, not whether it is interesting or fun as a task.
A performance task may actually involve a variety of situations, performances, and products (i.e. it can be a complex task, with related sub-tasks).
Writing the task in GRASPS form makes it likely that the task will involve authentic transfer: give the student a Goal, a Role, an Audience, a Setting, Performance/product demands,
and a set of Standards and criteria by which work will be judged.
Build in as much differentiation via options and alternatives in the situation(s) as is feasible without corrupting the validity of the assessment. (i.e. the various options should be
relatively equal in what they demand and reveal about a students understanding.)
The goal is sufficient evidence for each student. Any group component to a task should be
matched by evidence about the individuals understanding. This can be accomplished by
having separate parts to the task (such as a separate sub-task in which roles and perspective
change e.g. from group design team to solo reviewer) or by quizzes and prompts given to
each student (and put in Other Evidence) that assess for the same goals.
Dont end up unwittingly assessing for evidence unrelated to your goals. Keep asking the
2-question validity test and its implications: can the task be done well without understanding? Can the task be done poorly by someone with deep understanding? Then, the
task will not yield valid evidence, by definition. Be especially careful of demanding a mode
or method of assessment that favors some student ability over others in ways that are not at
the heart of your goals, e.g. you end up assessing - unfairly - writing ability or multimedia
facility instead of understanding of the subject.
Wiggins & McTighe 2008
page 14
The goal is a photo album, not a single snapshot, for the assessments in the unit to be both valid and
reliable.
Dont confuse assessment evidence with giving grades. Just because you plan to assess
it doesnt mean you will give a grade to it. Nor does the assessment score need to translate mechanically into a grade. If the task is difficult and new for students, then grade
accordingly; if the point of the assessment is more for feedback, then dont make it a grade
for achievement, only process and effort, etc. This is not to say: dont give grades. It is to
say: dont confuse feedback to students with the separate act of giving grades. [Local
grading policy may be in need for discussion and revision as a separate issue.]
Wiggins & McTighe 2008
page 15