SpiraxSarco-B9-Safety Valves
SpiraxSarco-B9-Safety Valves
SpiraxSarco-B9-Safety Valves
Module 9.1
Introduction to Safety Valves
Introduction
As soon as mankind was able to boil water to create steam, the necessity of the safety device
became evident. As long as 2000 years ago, the Chinese were using cauldrons with hinged lids to
allow (relatively) safer production of steam. At the beginning of the 14th century, chemists used
conical plugs and later, compressed springs to act as safety devices on pressurised vessels.
Early in the 19th century, boiler explosions on ships and locomotives frequently resulted from
faulty safety devices, which led to the development of the first safety relief valves.
In 1848, Charles Retchie invented the accumulation chamber, which increases the compression
surface within the safety valve allowing it to open rapidly within a narrow overpressure margin.
Today, most steam users are compelled by local health and safety regulations to ensure that their
plant and processes incorporate safety devices and precautions, which ensure that dangerous
conditions are prevented.
The primary function of a safety valve is therefore to protect life and property.
The principle type of device used to prevent overpressure in plant is the safety or safety relief
valve. The safety valve operates by releasing a volume of fluid from within the plant when a
predetermined maximum pressure is reached, thereby reducing the excess pressure in a safe
manner. As the safety valve may be the only remaining device to prevent catastrophic failure
under overpressure conditions, it is important that any such device is capable of operating at all
times and under all possible conditions.
Safety valves should be installed wherever the maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) of
a system or pressure-containing vessel is likely to be exceeded. In steam systems, safety valves
are typically used for boiler overpressure protection and other applications such as downstream
of pressure reducing controls. Although their primary role is for safety, safety valves are also used
in process operations to prevent product damage due to excess pressure. Pressure excess can be
generated in a number of different situations, including:
o An imbalance of fluid flowrate caused by inadvertently closed or opened isolation valves on a
process vessel.
o Failure of a cooling system, which allows vapour or fluid to expand.
o Compressed air or electrical power failure to control instrumentation.
o Transient pressure surges.
o Exposure to plant fires.
o Heat exchanger tube failure.
o Uncontrollable exothermic reactions in chemical plants.
o Ambient temperature changes.
The terms safety valve and safety relief valve are generic terms to describe many varieties of
pressure relief devices that are designed to prevent excessive internal fluid pressure build-up. A
wide range of different valves is available for many different applications and performance criteria.
Furthermore, different designs are required to meet the numerous national standards that govern
the use of safety valves.
A listing of the relevant national standards can be found at the end of this module.
In most national standards, specific definitions are given for the terms associated with safety and
safety relief valves. There are several notable differences between the terminology used in the
USA and Europe. One of the most important differences is that a valve referred to as a safety
valve in Europe is referred to as a safety relief valve or pressure relief valve in the USA. In
addition, the term safety valve in the USA generally refers specifically to the full-lift type of
safety valve used in Europe.
The ASME / ANSI PTC25.3 standards applicable to the USA define the following generic terms:
o Pressure relief valve - A spring-loaded pressure relief valve which is designed to open to
relieve excess pressure and to reclose and prevent the further flow of fluid after normal
conditions have been restored. It is characterised by a rapid-opening pop action or by opening
in a manner generally proportional to the increase in pressure over the opening pressure. It
may be used for either compressible or incompressible fluids, depending on design, adjustment,
or application.
This is a general term, which includes safety valves, relief valves and safety relief valves.
o Safety valve - A pressure relief valve actuated by inlet static pressure and characterised by
rapid opening or pop action.
Safety valves are primarily used with compressible gases and in particular for steam and air
services. However, they can also be used for process type applications where they may be
needed to protect the plant or to prevent spoilage of the product being processed.
o Relief valve - A pressure relief device actuated by inlet static pressure having a gradual lift
generally proportional to the increase in pressure over opening pressure.
Relief valves are commonly used in liquid systems, especially for lower capacities and thermal
expansion duty. They can also be used on pumped systems as pressure overspill devices.
o Safety relief valve - A pressure relief valve characterised by rapid opening or pop action, or by
opening in proportion to the increase in pressure over the opening pressure, depending on
the application, and which may be used either for liquid or compressible fluid.
In general, the safety relief valve will perform as a safety valve when used in a compressible
gas system, but it will open in proportion to the overpressure when used in liquid systems, as
would a relief valve.
The European standards (BS 6759 and DIN 3320) provide the following definition:
o Safety valve - A valve which automatically, without the assistance of any energy other than
that of the fluid concerned, discharges a certified amount of the fluid so as to prevent a
predetermined safe pressure being exceeded, and which is designed to re-close and prevent
the further flow of fluid after normal pressure conditions of service have been restored.
Typical examples of safety valves used on steam systems are shown in Figure 9.1.1.
DIN ASME
Fig. 9.1.1 Typical safety valves
Cap Cap
Spring Spring
adjuster adjuster
Spring Spring
Seat
The valve inlet (or approach channel) design can be either a full-nozzle or a semi-nozzle type. A
full-nozzle design has the entire wetted inlet tract formed from one piece. The approach channel
is the only part of the safety valve that is exposed to the process fluid during normal operation,
other than the disc, unless the valve is discharging.
Full-nozzles are usually incorporated in safety valves designed for process and high pressure
applications, especially when the fluid is corrosive.
Conversely, the semi-nozzle design consists of a seating ring fitted into the body, the top of which
forms the seat of the valve. The advantage of this arrangement is that the seat can easily be
replaced, without replacing the whole inlet.
The disc is held against the nozzle seat (under normal operating conditions) by the spring, which
is housed in an open or closed spring housing arrangement (or bonnet) mounted on top of the
body. The discs used in rapid opening (pop type) safety valves are surrounded by a shroud, disc
holder or huddling chamber which helps to produce the rapid opening characteristic.
Seat ring
(a) (b)
The closing force on the disc is provided by a spring, typically made from carbon steel. The
amount of compression on the spring is usually adjustable, using the spring adjuster, to alter the
pressure at which the disc is lifted off its seat.
Standards that govern the design and use of safety valves generally only define the three dimensions
that relate to the discharge capacity of the safety valve, namely the flow (or bore) area, the
curtain area and the discharge (or orifice) area (see Figure 9.1.4).
1. Flow area - The minimum cross-sectional area between the inlet and the seat, at its
narrowest point. The diameter of the flow area is represented by dimension d in Figure 9.1.4.
2. Curtain area - The area of the cylindrical or conical discharge opening between the seating
surfaces created by the lift of the disk above the seat. The diameter of the curtain area is
represented by dimension d1 in Figure 9.1.4.
3. Discharge area - This is the lesser of the curtain and flow areas, which determines the flow
through the valve.
d1
Curtain area L
Flow area d
Flow
Flow
Fig. 9.1.4 Illustration of the standard defined areas
Valves in which the flow area and not the curtain area determines the capacity are known as full
lift valves. These valves will have a greater capacity than low lift or high lift valves. This issue will
be discussed in greater depth in Module 9.2.
Although the principal elements of a conventional safety valve are similar, the design details can
vary considerably. In general, the DIN style valves (commonly used throughout Europe) tend to
use a simpler construction with a fixed skirt (or hood) arrangement whereas the ASME style
valves have a more complex design that includes one or two adjustable blowdown rings. The
position of these rings can be used to fine-tune the overpressure and blowdown values of the
valve.
For a given orifice area, there may be a number of different inlet and outlet connection sizes, as
well as body dimensions such as centreline to face dimensions. Furthermore, many competing
products, particularly of European origin have differing dimensions and capacities for the same
nominal size.
An exception to this situation is found with steel ASME specification valves, which invariably
follow the recommendations of the API Recommended Practice 526, where centreline to face
dimensions, and orifice sizes are listed. The orifice area series are referred to by a letter. It is
common for valves with the same orifice letter to have several different sizes of inlet and outlet
connection. For example, 2 x J x 3 and 3 x J x 4 are both valves which have the same size (J)
orifice, but they have differing inlet and outlet sizes as shown before and after the orifice letter
respectively. A 2 x J x 3 valve would have a 2 inlet, a J size orifice and a 3 outlet.
This letter series is also referenced in other standards, for example, BS 6759 part 3, which deals
with valves for process type applications and NFE- E 29-414.
Disc
Control chamber Shroud
Fig. 9.1.5 Typical disc and shroud arrangement used on rapid opening safety valves
As lift begins (Figure 9.1.6b), and fluid enters the chamber, a larger area of the shroud is exposed
to the fluid pressure. Since the magnitude of the lifting force (F) is proportional to the product of
the pressure (P) and the area exposed to the fluid (A); (F = P x A), the opening force is increased.
This incremental increase in opening force overcompensates for the increase in spring force,
causing rapid opening. At the same time, the shroud reverses the direction of the flow, which
provides a reaction force, further enhancing the lift.
These combined effects allow the valve to achieve its designed lift within a relatively small
percentage overpressure. For compressible fluids, an additional contributory factor is the rapid
expansion as the fluid volume increases from a higher to a lower pressure area. This plays a
major role in ensuring that the valve opens fully within the small overpressure limit. For liquids,
this effect is more proportional and subsequently, the overpressure is typically greater; 25% is
common.
Reseating
Once normal operating conditions have been restored, the valve is required to close again, but
since the larger area of the disc is still exposed to the fluid, the valve will not close until the
pressure has dropped below the original set pressure. The difference between the set pressure
and this reseating pressure is known as the blowdown, and it is usually specified as a percentage
of the set pressure. For compressible fluids, the blowdown is usually less than 10%, and for
liquids, it can be up to 20%.
Closing Opening
% lift
Pop
action
Reseat
10% Blowdown Overpressure 10%
Set pressure
Fig. 9.1.7 Relationship between pressure and lift for a typical safety valve
The design of the shroud must be such that it offers both rapid opening and relatively small
blowdown, so that as soon as a potentially hazardous situation is reached, any overpressure is
relieved, but excessive quantities of the fluid are prevented from being discharged. At the same
time, it is necessary to ensure that the system pressure is reduced sufficiently to prevent immediate
reopening.
The blowdown rings found on most ASME type safety valves are used to make fine adjustments
to the overpressure and blowdown values of the valves (see Figure 9.1.8). The lower blowdown
(nozzle) ring is a common feature on many valves where the tighter overpressure and blowdown
requirements require a more sophisticated designed solution. The upper blowdown ring is usually
factory set and essentially takes out the manufacturing tolerances which affect the geometry of
the huddling chamber.
The lower blowdown ring is also factory set to achieve the appropriate code performance
requirements but under certain circumstances can be altered. When the lower blowdown ring is
adjusted to its top position the huddling chamber volume is such that the valve will pop rapidly,
minimising the overpressure value but correspondingly requiring a greater blowdown before the
valve re-seats. When the lower blowdown ring is adjusted to its lower position there is minimal
restriction in the huddling chamber and a greater overpressure will be required before the valve
is fully open but the blowdown value will be reduced.
Approval authorities
For most countries, there are independent bodies who will examine the design and performance
of a product range to confirm conformity with the relevant code or standard. This system of third
party approval is very common for any safety related products and is often a customer requirement
before purchase, or a requirement of their insurance company.
The actual requirements for approval will vary depending on the particular code or standard. In
some cases, revalidation is necessary every few years, in others approval is indefinite as long as
no significant design changes are made, in which case the approval authority must be notified,
and re-approval sought. In the USA, the National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors
represents the US and Canadian government agencies empowered to assure adherence to code
construction and repair of boilers and pressure vessels.
Some of the more commonly encountered bodies are listed in Table 9.1.1.
Table 9.1.1 Approval authorities
Country Abbreviation Approval body
TÜV Association of Technical Supervision
Germany
DSRK Deutsche Schiffs-Revision und Klassifikation
Safety Assessment Federation Type Approval Service (STAS) formerly
SAFed
UK Associated Offices Technical Committee AOTC and British Engine
Lloyds Register of Shipping
CODAP
France
APAVE
Belgium Bureau Veritas
Netherlands Dienst voor het Stoomwezen
Norway DNV Det Norske Veritas
Italy ISPESL RINA Institution of Prevention and Security Italian Register of Shipping
Korea Ministry of Power and Resources Korean Register of Shipping
Canada Ministry of Labour Canada
United States NB National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors
For steam boiler applications there are very specific requirements for safety valve performance,
demanded by national standards and often, insurance companies. Approval by an independent
authority is often necessary, such as British Engine, TÜV or Lloyds Register.
Safety valves used in Europe are also subject to the standards associated with the Pressure
Equipment Directive (PED). Being classified as Safety accessories, safety valves are considered
as Category 4 equipment, which require the most demanding level of assessment within the
PED regime. This can usually be met by the manufacturer having an ISO 9000 quality system
and the safety valve design and performance certified by an officially recognised approval authority
referred to as a Notified Body.
Questions
2. What is the main operational difference between safety valves and relief valves?
a| Relief valves are characterised by a rapid opening or popping type lift characteristic ¨
b| Safety valves are characterised by a gradual opening type lift characteristic ¨
c| Relief valves are characterised by a gradual opening type lift characteristic ¨
d| Safety valves will have a rapid opening lift characteristic when used on compressible
fluid systems and a gradual opening characteristic when used on liquid systems ¨
Given:
d = 29 mm
d1 = 35 mm
L = 5 mm
d1
Curtain area L
Flow area d
Flow
Flow
a| 550 mm2 ¨
b| 617 mm2 ¨
c| 661 mm2 ¨
d| 693 mm2 ¨
5. Blowdown rings are often found on ASME type pressure relief valves.
What is the function of the lower or nozzle blowdown ring?
a| To adjust the blowdown value of the valve ¨
b| To adjust the set pressure of the valve ¨
c| To adjust the backpressure acting on the safety valve disc ¨
d| To adjust the overpressure and blowdown of the valve ¨
Answers
1:b, 2: c, 3: a, 4: d, 5: d, 6: a
Module 9.2
Types of Safety Valves
o Diaphragm safety valve - A direct loaded safety valve wherein linear moving and rotating
elements and springs are protected against the effects of the fluid by a diaphragm.
o Bellows safety valve - A direct loaded safety valve wherein sliding and (partially or fully)
rotating elements and springs are protected against the effects of the fluids by a bellows. The
bellows may be of such a design that it compensates for influences of backpressure.
o Controlled safety valve - Consists of a main valve and a control device. It also includes direct
acting safety valves with supplementary loading in which, until the set pressure is reached, an
additional force increases the closing force.
The British Standard BS 6759 lists the following types of safety valve:
o Direct loaded - A safety valve in which the loading due to the fluid pressure underneath the
valve disc is opposed only by direct mechanical loading such as a weight, a lever and weight,
or a spring.
o Conventional safety valve - A safety valve of the direct loaded type, the set pressure of which
will be affected by changes in the superimposed backpressure.
o Assisted safety valve - A direct loaded safety valve which, by means of a powered assistance
mechanism, is lifted at a pressure below the unassisted set pressure and will, even in the
event of failure of the assistance mechanism, comply with all the relevant requirements for
safety valves.
o Pilot operated (indirect loaded) safety valve - The operation is initiated and controlled by
the fluid discharged from a pilot valve, which is itself a direct loaded safety valve.
o Balanced bellows safety valve - A valve incorporating a bellows which has an effective area
equal to that of the valve seat, to eliminate the effect of backpressure on the set pressure of the
valve, and which effectively prevents the discharging fluid entering the bonnet space.
o Balanced bellows safety valve with auxiliary piston - A balanced bellows valve incorporating
an auxiliary piston, having an effective area equal to the valve seat, which becomes effective
in the event of bellows failure.
o Balanced piston safety valve - A valve incorporating a piston which has an area equal to that
of the valve seat, to eliminate the effect of backpressure on the set pressure of the valve.
o Bellows seal safety valve - A valve incorporating a bellows, which prevents discharging fluid
from entering the bonnet space.
In addition, the BS 759 standard pertaining to safety fittings for application to boilers, defines full
lift, high lift and lift safety valves:
o Lift safety valve (ordinary class) - The valve member lifts automatically a distance of at least
1/ th of the bore of the seating member, with an overpressure not exceeding 10% of the set
24
pressure.
o High lift safety valve - Valve member lifts automatically a distance of at least 1/12th of the bore
of the seating member, with an overpressure not exceeding 10% of the set pressure.
o Full lift safety valve - Valve member lifts automatically to give a discharge area between 100%
and 80% of the minimum area, at an overpressure not exceeding 5% of the set pressure.
The following table summarises the performance of different types of safety valve set out by the
various standards.
Table 9.2.1 Safety valve performance summary
Standard Fluid Overpressure Blowdown
Steam Standard 10% full lift 5% 10%
A.D. Merkblatt A2 Air or gas Standard 10% full lift 5% 10%
Liquid 10% 20%
I Steam 3% 2-6%
Steam 10% 7%
ASME
VIII Air or gas 10% 7%
Liquid 10% (see Note 3 below)
part 1 Steam Standard 10% full lift 5% 10%
BS 6759 part 2 Air or gas 10% 10%
part 3 Liquid 10 25% 2.5 - 20%
Notes:
1. ASME blowdown values shown are for valves with adjustable blowdown.
2. BS 6759 blowdown values shown are for valves with non-adjustable blowdown.
3. 25% is often used for non-certified sizing calculations and 20% can be used for fire protection of storage vessels.
Spring Spring
Vented
FS Spring bonnet FS
Disc area (AD) spring bonnet
Disc area (AD)
PB PB Vent
Disk guide PB PB
Disk Disk
PB PB PB PB
PV PV
Nozzle Nozzle
area (AN) area (AN)
(a) (b)
Fig. 9.2.1 Schematic diagram of safety valves with bonnets vented to
(a) the valve discharge and (b) the atmosphere
By considering the forces acting on the disc (with area AD), it can be seen that the required
opening force (equivalent to the product of inlet pressure (PV) and the nozzle area (AN)) is the
sum of the spring force (FS) and the force due to the backpressure (PB) acting on the top and
bottom of the disc. In the case of a spring housing vented to the discharge side of the valve (an
ASME conventional safety relief valve, see Figure 9.2.1 (a)), the required opening force is:
39$1 )63%$'3%$'$1ZKLFKVLPSOLHVWR(TXDWLRQ
Where:
PV = Fluid inlet pressure
AN = Nozzle area
FS = Spring force
PB = Backpressure
AD = Disc area
Therefore, any superimposed backpressure will tend to increase the closing force and the inlet
pressure required to lift the disc is greater.
In the case of a valve whose spring housing is vented to the atmosphere (Figure 9.2.1b), the
required opening force is:
Where:
PV = Fluid inlet pressure
AN = Nozzle area
FS = Spring force
PB = Backpressure
AD = Disc area
Thus, the superimposed backpressure acts with the vessel pressure to overcome the spring force,
and the opening pressure will be less than expected.
In both cases, if a significant superimposed backpressure exists, its effects on the set pressure
need to be considered when designing a safety valve system.
Once the valve starts to open, the effects of built-up backpressure also have to be taken into
account. For a conventional safety valve with the spring housing vented to the discharge side of
the valve, see Figure 9.2.1 (a), the effect of built-up backpressure can be determined by considering
Equation 9.2.1 and by noting that once the valve starts to open, the inlet pressure is the sum of
the set pressure, PS, and the overpressure, PO.
3632$1 )63%$1ZKLFKVLPSOLHVWR(TXDWLRQ
Where:
PS = Set pressure of safety valves
AN = Nozzle area
FS = Spring force
PB = Backpressure
PO = Overpressure
Therefore, if the backpressure is greater than the overpressure, the valve will tend to close,
reducing the flow. This can lead to instability within the system and can result in flutter or chatter
of the valve.
In general, if conventional safety valves are used in applications, where there is an excessive
built-up backpressure, they will not perform as expected. According to the API 520 Recommended
Practice Guidelines:
o A conventional pressure relief valve should typically not be used when the built-up backpressure
is greater than 10% of the set pressure at 10% overpressure. A higher maximum allowable
built-up backpressure may be used for overpressure greater than 10%.
The British Standard BS 6759, however, states that the built-up backpressure should be limited
to 12% of the set pressure when the valve is discharging at the certified capacity.
For the majority of steam applications, the backpressure can be maintained within these limits
by carefully sizing any discharge pipes. This will be discussed in Module 9.4. If, however, it is not
feasible to reduce the backpressure, then it may be necessary to use a balanced safety valve.
FS
Spring bonnet vent
AP Piston vent
AD
PB Piston PB PB
Vent
Disk
PB PB
A N PV AP = A N
Fig. 9.2.2 Schematic diagram of a piston type balanced safety valve
By considering the forces acting on the piston, it is evident that this type of valve is no longer
affected by any backpressure:
Where:
PV = Fluid inlet pressure
AN = Nozzle area
FS = Spring force
Bellows vent
Spindle guide
AB AB
Bellows PB
Disc
A N PV AB = AN
Fig. 9.2.3 Schematic diagram of the bellows balanced safety valve
Spindle
Pilot valve assembly
Seat
Pilot exhaust
Pilot supply line
External
blowdown
adjustment
Piston Outlet
Seat
Main valve
Inlet
Fig. 9.2.4 A piston type, pilot operated safety valve
The piston and seating arrangement incorporated in the main valve is designed so that the bottom
area of the piston, exposed to the inlet fluid, is less than the area of the top of the piston. As both
ends of the piston are exposed to the fluid at the same pressure, this means that under normal
system operating conditions, the closing force, resulting from the larger top area, is greater than
the inlet force. The resultant downward force therefore holds the piston firmly on its seat.
If the inlet pressure were to rise, the net closing force on the piston also increases, ensuring that
a tight shut-off is continually maintained. However, when the inlet pressure reaches the set
pressure, the pilot valve will pop open to release the fluid pressure above the piston. With much
less fluid pressure acting on the upper surface of the piston, the inlet pressure generates a net
upwards force and the piston will leave its seat. This causes the main valve to pop open, allowing
the process fluid to be discharged.
When the inlet pressure has been sufficiently reduced, the pilot valve will reclose, preventing the
further release of fluid from the top of the piston, thereby re-establishing the net downward
force, and causing the piston to reseat.
Pilot operated safety valves offer good overpressure and blowdown performance (a blowdown
of 2% is attainable). For this reason, they are used where a narrow margin is required between
the set pressure and the system operating pressure. Pilot operated valves are also available in
much larger sizes, making them the preferred type of safety valve for larger capacities.
One of the main concerns with pilot operated safety valves is that the small bore, pilot connecting
pipes are susceptible to blockage by foreign matter, or due to the collection of condensate in
these pipes. This can lead to the failure of the valve, either in the open or closed position,
depending on where the blockage occurs.
The British Standard BS 6759 states that all pilot operated safety valves should have at least two
independent pilot devices, which are connected individually and arranged such that failure of
either of the pilot will still enable the safety valve to continue to operate effectively.
Materials of construction
Except when safety valves are discharging, the only parts that are wetted by the process fluid are
the inlet tract (nozzle) and the disc. Since safety valves operate infrequently under normal
conditions, all other components can be manufactured from standard materials for most
applications. There are however several exceptions, in which case, special materials have to be
used, these include:
o Cryogenic applications.
o Corrosive fluids.
o Where contamination of discharged fluid is not permitted.
o When the valve discharges into a manifold that contains corrosive media discharged by
another valve.
The principal pressure-containing components of safety valves are normally constructed from
one of the following materials:
o Bronze - Commonly used for small screwed valves for general duty on steam, air and
hot water applications (up to 15 bar).
o Cast iron - Used extensively for ASME type valves. Its use is typically limited to 17 bar g.
o SG iron - Commonly used in European valves and to replace cast iron in higher pressure
valves (up to 25 bar g).
o Cast steel - Commonly used on higher pressure valves (up to 40 bar g). Process type valves are
usually made from a cast steel body with an austenitic full nozzle type construction.
o Austenitic stainless steel - Used in food, pharmaceutical or clean steam applications.
For extremely high pressure applications, pressure containing components may be forged or
machined from solid.
For all safety valves, it is important that moving parts, particularly the spindle and guides are
made from materials that will not easily degrade or corrode. As seats and discs are constantly in
contact with the process fluid, they must be able to resist the effects of erosion and corrosion. For
process applications, austenitic stainless steel is commonly used for seats and discs; sometimes
they are stellite faced for increased durability. For extremely corrosive fluids, nozzles, discs and
seats are made from special alloys such as monel or hastelloy.
The spring is a critical element of the safety valve and must provide reliable performance
within the required parameters. BS 6759 lists recommended materials, but most other standards
just insist on sensible materials based on sound engineering practice. Standard safety valves
will typically use carbon steel for moderate temperatures. Tungsten steel is used for higher
temperature, non-corrosive applications, and stainless steel is used for corrosive or clean steam
duty. For sour gas and high temperature applications, often special materials such as monel,
hastelloy and inconel are used.
Levers
Standard safety valves are generally fitted with an easing lever, which enables the valve to be
lifted manually in order to ensure that it is operational at pressures in excess of 75% of set
pressure. This is usually done as part of routine safety checks, or during maintenance to prevent
seizing. The fitting of a lever is usually a requirement of national standards and insurance companies
for steam and hot water applications. For example, the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code
states that pressure relief valves must be fitted with a lever if they are to be used on air, water
over 60°C, and steam.
A standard or open lever is the simplest type of lever available. It is typically used on applications
where a small amount of leakage of the fluid to the atmosphere is acceptable, such as on steam
and air systems, (see Figure 9.2.5 (a)).
Where it is not acceptable for the media to escape, a packed lever must be used. This uses a
packed gland seal to ensure that the fluid is contained within the cap, (see Figure 9.2.5 (b))
For service where a lever is not required, a cap can be used to simply protect the adjustment
screw. If used in conjunction with a gasket, it can be used to prevent emissions to the atmosphere,
(see Figure 9.2.6).
A test gag (Figure 9.2.7) may be used to prevent the valve from opening at the set pressure during
hydraulic testing when commissioning a system. Once tested, the gag screw is removed and
replaced with a short blanking plug before the valve is placed in service.
Bonnet Bonnet
Diaphragm
Questions
1. What is the typical maximum overpressure value for a standard safety valve used on
steam applications, according to most national standards?
a| 5% ¨
b| 10% ¨
c| 15% ¨
d| 20% ¨
3. Which type of conventional safety valve is most suitable for steam applications
on the basis of its relationship between cost and discharge capacity?
a| Full lift ¨
b| High lift ¨
c| Low lift ¨
d| Full bore ¨
4. Which of the following statements about pilot operated safety valves are true?
i. Small margins of overpressure and blowdown are achievable
ii. The closing force increases as the inlet pressure increases, ensuring a tight shut-off
iii. Pilot operated valves can fail in the open or closed position due to the build up of
condensate in the pilot connecting pipes
a| i only ¨
b| iii only ¨
c| i and ii ¨
d| i, ii and iii ¨
5. Which material would be most suitable for safety valves used on high pressure
steam applications up to 25 bar?
a| Austenitic stainless steel ¨
b| SG iron ¨
c| Cast carbon steel ¨
d| Bronze ¨
Answers
1:b, 2: c, 3: a, 4: d, 5: b, 6: c
Module 9.3
Safety Valve Selection
As there is such a wide range of safety valves, there is no difficulty in selecting a safety valve that
meets the specific requirements of a given application. Once a suitable type has been selected, it
is imperative that the correct relieving pressure and discharge capacity are established, and a
suitably sized valve and set pressure is specified.
The selection of a specific type of safety valve is governed by several factors:
o Cost - This is the most obvious consideration when selecting a safety valve for a non-critical
application. When making cost comparisons, it is imperative to consider the capacity of the
valve as well as the nominal size. As mentioned in the previous module, there can be large
variations between models with the same inlet connection but with varying lift characteristics.
o Type of disposal system - Valves with an open bonnet can be used on steam, air or non-toxic
gas, if discharge to the atmosphere, other than through the discharge system, is acceptable.
A lifting lever is often specified in these applications.
For gas or liquid applications, where escape to the atmosphere is not permitted, a closed
bonnet must be specified. In such applications, it is also necessary to use either a closed / gas
tight cap or packed lever.
For applications with a significant superimposed backpressure (common in manifolds, typically
seen in the process industry) a balancing bellows or piston construction is required.
o Valve construction - A semi-nozzle type construction should be used for non-toxic, non-
corrosive type media at moderate pressures, whereas valves with the full nozzle type construction
are typically used in the process industry for corrosive media or for extremely high pressures.
For corrosive fluids or high temperatures, special materials of construction may also be required.
o Operating characteristics - Performance requirements vary according to application and the
valve must be selected accordingly. For steam boilers, a small overpressure is required, usually
3% or 5%. For most other applications, 10% overpressure is required, but according to API 520,
for special applications such as fire protection, larger valves with overpressures of 20% are allowed.
For liquids, overpressures of 10% or 25% are common, and blowdown values tend to be up to
20%.
o Approval - For many valve applications, the end user will state the required code or standard
for the construction and performance of the valve. This is usually accompanied by a requirement
for approval by an independent authority, to guarantee conformance with the required standard.
The following table summarises the determination of the set point based on the first constraint.
Table 9.3.1 Determination of the set pressure using safety valve overpressure and apparatus MAAP
Safety valve overpressure
Apparatus
5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
20% MAWP MAWP MAWP MAWP 95% MAWP
15% MAWP MAWP MAWP 95% MAWP 90% MAWP
MAAP
10% MAWP MAWP 95% MAWP 90% MAWP 85% MAWP
5% MAWP 95% MAWP 90% MAWP 85% MAWP 80% MAWP
Unless operational considerations dictate otherwise, in order to meet the second constraint, the
safety valve set pressure should always be somewhat above the normal working pressure with a
margin allowed for the blowdown. A safety valve set just above the normal working pressure can
lead to a poor shut-off after any discharge.
When the system operating pressure and safety valve set pressure have to be as close as possible
to one another, a 0.1 bar minimum margin between reseat pressure and normal operating pressure
is recommended to ensure a tight shut-off. This is called the shut-off margin. In this case, it is
important to take into account any variations in the system operating pressure before adding the
0.1 bar margin. Such variations can occur where a safety valve is installed after pressure reducing
valves (PRVs) and other control valves, with relatively large proportional bands.
In practically all control systems, there is a certain amount of proportional offset associated
with the proportional band (see Block 5, Control Theory, for more information regarding
proportional offset). If a self-acting PRV is set under full-load conditions, the control pressure at
no-load conditions can be significantly greater than its set pressure. Conversely, if the valve is
set under no-load conditions, the full-load pressure will be less than its set pressure.
For example, consider a pilot operated PRV with a maximum proportional band of only 0.2 bar.
With a control pressure of 5.0 bar set under full-load conditions, it would give 5.2 bar under
no-load conditions. Alternatively, if the control pressure of 5.0 bar is set under no-load conditions,
the same valve would exhibit a control pressure of 4.8 bar under full-load conditions.
When determining the set pressure of the safety valve, if the PRV control pressure is set under no-
load conditions, then the proportional offset does not have to be taken into account. However, if
the PRV control pressure is set under full-load conditions, it is necessary to consider the increase
in downstream pressure as a result of the proportional offset of the PRV (see Example 9.3.1).
The amount of pressure control offset depends on the type of control valve and the pressure
controller being used. It is therefore important to determine the proportional band of the upstream
control valve as well as how this valve was commissioned.
Example 9.3.1
A safety valve, which is to be installed after a PRV, is required to be set as close as possible to
the PRV working pressure. Given the parameters below, determine the most suitable safety
valve set pressure:
PRV set pressure: 6.0 bar (set under full-load conditions)
PRV proportional band: 0.3 bar operating above the PRV working pressure
Safety valve blowdown: 10%
Answer:
Since it is necessary to ensure that the safety valve set pressure is as close to the PRV working
pressure as possible, the safety valve is chosen so that its blowdown pressure is greater than
the PRV working pressure (taking into account the proportional offset), and a 0.1 bar shut-off
margin.
Firstly, the effect of the proportional offset needs to be considered; the normal maximum working
pressure that will be encountered is:
6.0 bar + 0.3 bar = 6.3 bar (NWP)
By adding the 0.1 bar shut-off margin, the blowdown pressure has to be 10% greater than
6.4 bar. For this example, this means that the safety valves set pressure has to be:
110
x 6.4 bar = 7.04 bar
100
The set pressure would therefore be chosen as 7.04 bar, provided that this does not exceed
the MAWP of the protected system.
Note that if the PRV were set at 6.0 bar under no-load conditions, and with a safety valve 10%
blowdown, the safety valve set pressure would be:
110
x (6.0 + 0.1) = 6.71 bar
100
Where:
CDSP = Cold differential set pressure
RISP = Required installed set pressure
CBP = Constant backpressure
For variable superimposed backpressure, the effective set pressure could change as the
backpressure varies, and a conventional valve could not be used if the variation were more than
10% to 15% of the set pressure. Instead, a balanced valve would have to be used.
The pressure level relationships for pressure relief valves as shown in the API Recommended
Practice 520 is illustrated in Figure 9.3.1.
Maximum allowable
accumulated pressure Maximum relieving pressure
116
for multiple valve installation for process sizing:
(other than fire exposure) 115 - Multiple valves
- Single valves
Margin of
safety due
to orifice
selection
Maximum allowable Maximum allowable set
accumulated pressure 110 pressure for supplemental
Percent of maximum allowable working pressure (gauge)
for single valve valves (fire exposure)
(other than fire exposure)
Overpressure (maximum)
Overpressure (typical)
Standard leak
90
test pressure
85
Fig. 9.3.1 Pressure level relationships for pressure relief valves (from API 520)
Sealing
For valves not claiming any particular standard and with no reference to a standard on the
name-plate or supporting literature there is no restriction on who can set the valve. Such valves
are normally used to indicate that a certain pressure has been reached, and do not act as a
safety device.
For valves that are independently approved by a notified body, to a specific standard, the setting
and sealing of the valve is a part of the approval. In this case, the valve must be set by the
manufacturer or an approved agent of the manufacturer working in accordance with agreed
quality procedures and using equipment approved by the manufacturer or the notified body.
To prevent unauthorised alteration or
tampering, most standards require provision to
be made for sealing the valve after setting.
The most common method is to use sealing wire
to secure the cap to the spring housing and the Lead seal
housing to the body. It may also be used to lock
any blowdown adjuster ring pins into position.
The wire is subsequently sealed with a lead seal,
which may bear the imprint of the setters
trademark.
Safety valve
(a)
Safety valve
(b)
The safety valve can be fitted within the pressure reducing station itself, that is, before the
downstream stop valve, as in Figure 9.3.3 (a), or further downstream, nearer the apparatus
as in Figure 9.3.3 (b). Fitting the safety valve before the downstream stop valve has the
following advantages:
o The safety valve can be tested in-line by shutting down the downstream stop valve without
the chance of downstream apparatus being over pressurised, should the safety valve fail
under test.
o When the testing is carried out in-line, the safety valve does not have to be removed and
bench tested, which is more costly and time consuming.
o When setting the PRV under no-load conditions, the operation of the safety valve can be
observed, as this condition is most likely to cause simmer. If this should occur, the PRV
pressure can be adjusted to below the safety valve reseat pressure.
o Any additional take-offs downstream are inherently protected. Only apparatus with a lower
MAWP requires additional protection. This can have significant cost benefits.
It is however sometimes practical to fit the safety valve closer to the steam inlet of any apparatus.
Indeed, a separate safety valve may have to be fitted on the inlet to each downstream piece of
apparatus, when the PRV supplies several such pieces of apparatus.
The following points can be used as a guide:
o If supplying one piece of apparatus, which has a MAWP pressure less than the PRV supply
pressure, the apparatus must be fitted with a safety valve, preferably close-coupled to its steam
inlet connection.
o If a PRV is supplying more than one apparatus and the MAWP of any item is less than the PRV
supply pressure, either the PRV station must be fitted with a safety valve set at the lowest
possible MAWP of the connected apparatus, or each item of affected apparatus must be fitted
with a safety valve.
o The safety valve must be located so that the pressure cannot accumulate in the apparatus via
another route, for example, from a separate steam line or a bypass line.
It could be argued that every installation deserves special consideration when it comes to
safety, but the following applications and situations are a little unusual and worth considering:
o Fire - Any pressure vessel should be protected from overpressure in the event of fire. Although
a safety valve mounted for operational protection may also offer protection under fire conditions,
such cases require special consideration, which is beyond the scope of this text.
o Exothermic applications - These must be fitted with a safety valve close-coupled to the apparatus
steam inlet or the body direct. No alternative applies.
o Safety valves used as warning devices - Sometimes, safety valves are fitted to systems as
warning devices. They are not required to relieve fault loads but to warn of pressures increasing
above normal working pressures for operational reasons only. In these instances, safety valves
are set at the warning pressure and only need to be of minimum size. If there is any danger
of systems fitted with such a safety valve exceeding their maximum allowable working pressure,
they must be protected by additional safety valves in the usual way.
Example 9.3.2
In order to illustrate the importance of the positioning of a safety valve, consider an automatic
pump trap (see Block 14) used to remove condensate from a heating vessel. The automatic pump
trap (APT), incorporates a mechanical type pump, which uses the motive force of steam to pump
the condensate through the return system. The position of the safety valve will depend on the
MAWP of the APT and its required motive inlet pressure.
If the MAWP of the APT is more than or equal to that of the vessel, the arrangement shown in
Figure 9.3.4 could be used.
Safety valve A set Vessel
7 bar g 0.5 bar g at 0.6 bar g MAWP
Pressure 0.7 bar g
Stop reducing Temperature
valve valve control valve
A
Balance
Steam supply to automatic pump trap
pipe
This arrangement would be suitable if the pump-trap motive pressure was less than 0.5 bar
(safety valve set pressure less a 0.1 bar shut-off margin). Since the MAWP of both the APT and
the vessel are greater than the safety valve set pressure, a single safety valve would provide
suitable protection for the system.
However, if the pump-trap motive pressure had to be greater than 0.5 bar, the APT supply
would have to be taken from the high pressure side of the PRV, and reduced to a more
appropriate pressure, but still less than the 4.5 bar g MAWP of the APT. The arrangement
shown in Figure 9.3.5 would be suitable in this situation.
Here, two separate PRV stations are used each with its own safety valve. If the APT internals
failed and steam at 4 bar g passed through the APT and into the vessel, safety valve A would
relieve this pressure and protect the vessel. Safety valve B would not lift as the pressure in the
APT is still acceptable and below its set pressure.
Vessel
7 bar g Pressure 0.5 bar g Safety valve A MAWP
reducing set at 0.6 bar g 0.7 bar g
Stop valve
valve A Temperature
control valve
Steam supply to
Automatic pump trap
Balance
Safety pipe Condensate
Pressure valve drain line
reducing B
valve set at
B 4.5 bar g Automatic pump trap
set at MAWP
4 bar g 4.5 bar g
Fig. 9.3.5 The automatic pump trap and vessel system using two PRV stations
It should be noted that safety valve A is positioned on the downstream side of the temperature
control valve; this is done for both safety and operational reasons:
o Safety - If the internals of the APT failed, the safety valve would still relieve the pressure in the
vessel even if the control valve were shut.
o Operation - There is less chance of safety valve A simmering during operation in this position,
as the pressure is typically lower after the control valve than before it.
Also, note that if the MAWP of the pump-trap were greater than the pressure upstream of
PRV A, it would be permissible to omit safety valve B from the system, but safety valve A must
be sized to take into account the total fault flow through PRV B as well as through PRV A.
Example 9.3.3
A pharmaceutical factory has twelve jacketed pans on the same production floor, all rated with
the same MAWP. Where would the safety valve be positioned?
One solution would be to install a safety valve on the inlet to each pan (Figure 9.3.6). In this
instance, each safety valve would have to be sized to pass the entire load, in case the PRV failed
open whilst the other eleven pans were shut down.
Fig. 9.3.6 Protection of the heating pans using individual safety valves
As all the pans are rated to the same MAWP, it is possible to install a single safety valve after the PRV.
Safety valve
etc
Pressure
reducing
valve
If additional apparatus with a lower MAWP than the pans (for example, a shell and tube heat
exchanger) were to be included in the system, it would be necessary to fit an additional safety
valve. This safety valve would be set to an appropriate lower set pressure and sized to pass the
fault flow through the temperature control valve (see Figure 9.3.8).
Safety valve 1
Safety valve 2
etc
Pressure
reducing
valve
Temperature
control valve
Fig. 9.3.8 Possible safety valve arrangement if additional apparatus was included in the system
Questions
5. Which location would be the most appropriate position for a safety valve
installed to protect a single temperature controlled heating vessel?
Pressure
reducing
valve
A B C D
Stop Stop Control
valve valve valve
Heating vessel
a| A ¨
b| B ¨
c| C ¨
d| D ¨
Answers
1:b, 2: a, 3: b, 4: a, 5: d, 6: d
Module 9.4
Safety Valve Sizing
A safety valve must always be sized and able to vent any source of steam so that the pressure
within the protected apparatus cannot exceed the maximum allowable accumulated pressure
(MAAP). This not only means that the valve has to be positioned correctly, but that it is also
correctly set. The safety valve must then also be sized correctly, enabling it to pass the required
amount of steam at the required pressure under all possible fault conditions.
Once the type of safety valve has been established, along with its set pressure and its position in the
system, it is necessary to calculate the required discharge capacity of the valve. Once this is known,
the required orifice area and nominal size can be determined using the manufacturers specifications.
In order to establish the maximum capacity required, the potential flow through all the relevant
branches, upstream of the valve, need to be considered.
In applications where there is more than one possible flow path, the sizing of the safety valve
becomes more complicated, as there may be a number of alternative methods of determining its
size. Where more than one potential flow path exists, the following alternatives should be considered:
o The safety valve can be sized on the maximum flow experienced in the flow path with the
greatest amount of flow.
o The safety valve can be sized to discharge the flow from the combined flow paths.
This choice is determined by the risk of two or more devices failing simultaneously. If there is the
slightest chance that this may occur, the valve must be sized to allow the combined flows of the
failed devices to be discharged. However, where the risk is negligible, cost advantages may
dictate that the valve should only be sized on the highest fault flow. The choice of method
ultimately lies with the company responsible for insuring the plant.
For example, consider the pressure vessel and automatic pump-trap (APT) system as shown in
Figure 9.4.1. The unlikely situation is that both the APT and pressure reducing valve (PRV A)
could fail simultaneously. The discharge capacity of safety valve A would either be the fault
load of the largest PRV, or alternatively, the combined fault load of both the APT and PRV A.
This document recommends that where multiple flow paths exist, any relevant safety valve should,
at all times, be sized on the possibility that relevant upstream pressure control valves may fail
simultaneously.
Pressure vessel
7 bar g 0.5 bar g MAWP
Safety valve A
PRV A set at 0.6 bar g 0.7 bar g
Stop set at
valve 0.5 bar g
Steam
7 bar g 3 bar g
Steam supply
to APT Balance
Safety pipe Condensate
PRV B valve drain line
set at B
3 bar g set at
4 bar g
APT10
MAWP
4.5 bar g
o The full open capacity (Kvs) of the upstream control valve, see Equation 9.4.1
Example 9.4.1
Consider the PRV arrangement in Figure 9.4.2.
Where:
NWP = Normal working pressure
MAWP = Maximum allowable working pressure
PS = Safety valve set pressure
Po = Safety valve overpressure Safety valve
PR = Safety valve relieving pressure PS = 4.0 bar g
PO = 5% of PS
Safety valve Therefore PR = 4 x 1.05
Ps = 11.6 bar g PR = 4.2 bar g
Steam
Stop valve PRV Stop valve Control valve
Kvs = 6.3
Fig. 9.4.2 Sizing a safety valve for a typical pressure reducing application
The supply pressure of this system (Figure 9.4.2) is limited by an upstream safety valve with a set
pressure of 11.6 bar g. The fault flow through the PRV can be determined using the steam mass
flow equation (Equation 9.4.1):
Where:
m = Fault load (kg / h)
KVS = PRV full open capacity index (KVS = 6.3)
χ 3UHVVXUHGURSUDWLR 33
3
P1 = Fault pressure (taken as the set pressure of the upstream safety valve) (bar a)
P2 = Relieving pressure of the apparatus safety valve (bar a)
Equation 9.4.1 is used when the pressure drop ratio is less than 0.42.
If the pressure drop ratio is 0.42 or greater, the mass flow is calculated using Equation 9.4.2
In this example:
3 EDUJ EDUD
3 EDUJ EDUD
SV615 flow capacity for saturated steam in kilogrammes per hour (kg / h)
(calculated in accordance with BS 6759 at 5% overpressure)
Derated coefficient of discharge (Kdr) = 0.71
Valve size DN 15 / 20 20 / 32 25 / 40 32 / 50 40 / 65 50 / 80
Area (mm2) 113 314 452 661 1 075 1 662
Set pressure
(bar g) Flow capacity for saturated steam kg / h
Where sizing charts are not available or do not cater for particular fluids or conditions, such as
backpressure, high viscosity or two-phase flow, it may be necessary to calculate the minimum required
orifice area. Methods for doing this are outlined in the appropriate governing standards, such as:
o AD-Merkblatt A2, DIN 3320, TRD 421
The methods outlined in these standards are based on the coefficient of discharge, which is the
ratio of the measured capacity to the theoretical capacity of a nozzle with an equivalent flow area.
$FWXDOIORZLQJFDSDFLW\
.G Equation 9.4.3
7KHRUHWLFDOIORZLQJFDSDFLW\
Where:
Kd = Coefficient of discharge
Coefficient of discharge
Coefficients of discharge are specific to any particular safety valve range and will be approved by the
manufacturer. If the valve is independently approved, it is given a certified coefficient of discharge.
This figure is often derated by further multiplying it by a safety factor 0.9, to give a derated
coefficient of discharge. Derated coefficient of discharge is termed Kdr = Kd x 0.9
When using standard methods of calculating the required orifice area, the following points may
need to be considered:
o Critical and sub-critical flow - the flow of gas or vapour through an orifice, such as the flow
area of a safety valve, increases as the downstream pressure is decreased. This holds true
until the critical pressure is reached, and critical flow is achieved. At this point, any further
decrease in the downstream pressure will not result in any further increase in flow.
A relationship (called the critical pressure ratio) exists between the critical pressure and the
upstream pressure, and, for gases, is shown by Equation 9.4.4.
N
3%
N
3 N Equation 9.4.4
Where:
PB = Backpressure (bar a)
P1 = Actual relieving pressure (bar a)
k = Isentropic coefficient of the gas or vapour upstream of the safety valve
For gases, with similar properties to an ideal gas, k is the ratio of specific heat of constant
pressue (cp) to constant volume (cv), i.e. cp : cv. k is always greater than unity, and typically
between 1 and 1.7 (see Table 9.4.6).
For steam, although k is an isentropic coefficient, it is not actually the ratio of cp : cv.
For saturated steam, k is taken to be 1.135 and for superheated steam, k is taken to be 1.3.
As a guide, for saturated steam, critical pressure is taken as 58% of accumulated inlet pressure
in absolute terms.
o Overpressure - Before sizing, the design overpressure of the valve must be established. It is
not permitted to calculate the capacity of the valve at a lower overpressure than that at which
the coefficient of discharge was established. It is however, permitted to use a higher overpressure
(see Table 9.2.1, Module 9.2, for typical overpressure values). For DIN type full lift (Vollhub)
valves, the design lift must be achieved at 5% overpressure, but for sizing purposes, an
overpressure value of 10% may be used.
For liquid applications, the overpressure is 10% according to AD-Merkblatt A2, DIN 3320, TRD 421
and ASME, but for non-certified ASME valves, it is quite common for a figure of 25% to be used.
o Backpressure - The sizing calculations in the AD-Merkblatt A2, DIN 3320 and TRD 421
standards account for backpressure in the outflow function,(Y), which includes a backpressure
correction. The ASME / API RP 520 and BS 6759 standards, however, require an additional
backpressure correction factor to be determined and then incorporated in the relevant equation.
o Two-phase flow - When sizing safety valves for boiling liquids (e.g. hot water) consideration
must be given to vaporisation (flashing) during discharge. It is assumed that the medium is in
liquid state when the safety valve is closed and that, when the safety valve opens, part of the
liquid vaporises due to the drop in pressure through the safety valve. The resulting flow is
referred to as two-phase flow.
The required flow area has to be calculated for the liquid and vapour components of the
discharged fluid. The sum of these two areas is then used to select the appropriate orifice size
from the chosen valve range. (see Example 9.4.3)
Many standards do not actually specify sizing formula for two-phase flow and recommend
that the manufacturer be contacted directly for advice in these instances.
χ
$2 Equation 9.4.5
α Z35
Use Equation 9.4.6 to calculate the minimum required orifice area for a safety valve used on
air and gas applications:
Use Equation 9.4.7 to calculate the minimum required orifice area for a safety valve used on
liquid applications:
Where:
AO = Minimum cross sectional flow area (mm2)
m = Mass flow to be discharged (kg / h)
PR = Absolute relieving pressure (bar a)
DP = PR - PB
PB = Absolute backpressure (bar a)
T = Inlet temperature (K)
r = Density (kg / h) (see Appendix A at the back of this module)
M = Molar mass (kg / kmol) (see Appendix A at the back of this module)
Z = Compressibility factor (see Equation 9.4.8)
aW = Outflow coefficient (specified by the manufacturer)
Y = Outflow function (see Figure 9.4.4)
c = Pressure medium coefficient (see Figure 9.4.5)
The outflow function (Y) for AD-Merkblatt A2, DIN 3320 and TRD 421
0.6
k Y max.
1.8 0.527
1.6 0.507
0.5
1.4 0.484
1.2 0.459
1.0 0.429
0.4
Outflow function Y
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Pressure ratio (PB / PR)
PB = Absolute backpressure
PR = Absolute relieving pressure
Fig. 9.4.4 The outflow function (Y) as used in AD-Merkblatt A2, DIN 3320 and TRD 421
Pressure medium coefficient (c) for AD-Merkblatt A2, DIN 3320 and TRD 421
700°C
2.8
600°C
2.6
500°C
2.4
h x mm2 x bar a
400°C
kg
2.2
Pressure medium coefficient
300°C
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
= 35 0ν
Equation 9.4.8
5X7
Where:
Z = Compressibility factor
PR = Safety valve relieving pressure (bar a)
n = Specific volume of the gas at the actual relieving pressure and temperature (m3 / kg)
(see Appendix A at the back of this module). Note: The specific volume of a gas
will change with temperature and pressure, and therefore it must be determined for the
operating conditions.
M = Molar mass (kg / kmol) (see Appendix A at the back of this module)
Ru = Universal gas constant (8 314 Nm / kmol K)
T = Actual relieving temperature (K)
Example 9.4.2
Determine the minimum required safety valve orifice area under the following conditions:
Medium: Saturated steam
Discharge quantity (m): 2 500 kg / h
Set pressure (Ps): 4 bar a
Backpressure: Atmospheric pressure 1 bar a
Stated outflow coefficient (aw): 0.7
It is first necessary to determine the pressure medium coefficient using Figure 9.4.5.
Pressure medium coefficient (c): 1.88
χ [
Using Equation 9.4.5: $2
α Z[3V
Consequently, the chosen safety valve would need an orifice area of at least 1 678 mm2.
Two-phase flow
In order to determine the minimum orifice area for a two-phase flow system (e.g. hot water), it
is first necessary to establish what proportion of the discharge will be vapour (n). This is done
using the Equation 9.4.9:
KIKI
Q Equation 9.4.9
KIJ
Where:
n = The proportion of discharge fluid which is vapour
hf1 = Enthalpy of liquid before the valve (kJ / kg)
hf2 = Enthalpy of liquid after the valve (kJ / kg)
hfg2 = Enthalpy of evaporation after the valve (kJ / kg)
For hot water, the enthalpy values can be obtained from steam tables.
In order to determine the proportion of flow, which is vapour, the discharge capacity is multiplied
by n. The remainder of the flow will therefore be in the liquid state.
The area sizing calculation from Equations 9.4.5, 9.4.6 and 9.4.7 can then be used to calculate
the required area to discharge the vapour portion and then the liquid portion. The sum of these
areas is then used to establish the minimum required orifice area.
Example 9.4.3
Consider hot water under the following conditions:
Temperature: 160°C
Discharge quantity (m): 3 900 kg / h
Set pressure (PS): 10 bar g = 11 bar a
Backpressure (PB): Atmospheric
Density of water at 160°C (r): 908 kg / m³
DP = PS - PB: 10 bar
Stated outflow coefficient (aw): 0.7
Using steam tables, the proportion of vapour is first calculated:
hf1 = 675 kJ / kg (at 160°C)
hf2 = 417 kJ / kg (at 1 bar a, atmospheric pressure)
hfg2 = 2 258 kJ / kg (at 1 bar a, atmospheric pressure)
$2
35.G.6+ Equation 9.4.10
Use Equation 9.4.11 to calculate the minimum required orifice area for a safety valve used on
air and gas applications:
Use Equation 9.4.12 to calculate the minimum required orifice area for a safety valve used on
liquid applications:
$2 *
.G.µ .Z 3536 Equation 9.4.12
Where:
AO = Required effective discharge area (in2)
m = Required mass flow through the valve (lb / h)
V = Required volume flow through the valve (ft3 / min)
V1 = Required volume flow through the valve (U.S. gal / min)
PR = Upstream relieving pressure (psi a)
PB = Absolute backpressure (psi a)
Cg = Nozzle gas constant (see Table 9.4.1)
T = Relieving temperature (°R º °F + 460)
G = Specific gravity (ratio of molar mass of the fluid to the molar mass of air (28.96 kg / kmol))
(see Appendix A at the back of this module)
Z = Compressibility factor (see Equation 9.4.8)
Kd = Effective coefficient of discharge (specified by the manufacturer)
KSH = Superheat correction factor (see Table 9.4.2)
KB = Backpressure correction factor for gas and vapour (see Figures 9.4.6 and 9.4.7)
KW = Backpressure correction factor for liquids (bellows balanced valves only) (see Figure 9.4.8)
Kµ = Viscosity factor (see Figure 9.4.9)
Gas and vapour constant backpressure correction factor for ASME / API 520
o Balanced bellows valves
The backpressure correction factor (Equation 9.4.14) is the ratio of the capacity with backpressure,
C1, to the capacity with zero backpressure, C2.
The curves shown in Figure 9.4.6 to Figure 9.4.8 are applicable to set pressures of 50 psi g
(3.4 bar g) and above. For a given set pressure, these values are limited to a backpressure less
than the critical pressure. For sub-critical flow and backpressures below 50 psi g, the manufacturer
should be consulted for values of KB.
Where:
PB = Backpressure (psi g)
PS = Set pressure (psi g)
1.0
20% overp
0.9 ressure
& 10%
.% 0.8 ove
& rpr
ess
ure
0.7
0.6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
3%[
3HUFHQWRIJDXJHEDFNSUHVVXUH
36
Fig. 9.4.6 Constant backpressure correction factor (KB) for gas and vapour
as used in ASME / API RP 520 for balanced bellows valves
o Conventional valves
Where:
PB = Backpressure (psi g)
PR = Relieving pressure (psi g)
& k 1.1
.%
& k 1.3
k 1.5
k 1.7
k = isentropic
coefficient
(see table 9.4.6)
3%[
3HUFHQWRIJDXJHEDFNSUHVVXUH
3
Fig. 9.4.7 Constant backpressure correction factor (KB) for gas and vapour
as used in ASME / API RP 520 for conventional valves
0.9
0.8
0.7
Kµ
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
10 20 40 100 200 400 1 000 2 000 10 000 20 000 100 000
Reynolds number Re
Fig. 9.4.9 Viscosity correction factor (Km) as used in ASME / API RP 520 and BS 6759
The Reynolds number can be calculated using Equations 9.4.17 and 9.4.18:
5H
Metric units Equation 9.4.17
$2
Where:
Re = Reynolds number
V = Volume flow to be discharged (U.S. gal / min)
m = Mass flow to be discharged (kg / h)
µ = Dynamic viscosity (Imperial cP, Metric Pa s)
AO = Discharge area (Imperial in2, Metric mm2)
$2
35.GU.6+ Equation 9.4.19
Use Equation 9.4.20 to calculate the minimum required orifice area for a safety valve used on
air applications:
Use Equation 9.4.21 to calculate the minimum required orifice area for a safety valve used on
gas applications:
$ 2 =7
35&J.GU 0 Equation 9.4.21
Use Equation 9.4.22 to calculate the minimum required orifice area for a safety valve used on
liquid applications:
$ 2 Equation 9.4.22
.GU. m ρ D3
Use Equation 9.4.23 to calculate the minimum required orifice area for a safety valve used on
hot air applications:
$2 Equation 9.4.23
35.GU
Where:
AO = Flow area (mm2)
m = Mass flow to be discharged (kg / h)
V = Volumetric flow to be discharged (l / s)
Q = Hot water capacity (kW)
Cg = Nozzle gas constant (see Table 9.4.3)
DP = PR - PB
PR = Absolute relieving pressure (bar a)
PB = Absolute backpressure (bar a)
T = Inlet temperature (K)
r = Density (kg / m3) (see Appendix A at the back of this module)
M = Molecular mass (kg / kmol) (see Appendix A at the back of this module)
Z = Compressibility factor (see Equation 9.4.8)
Kdr = Derated coefficient of discharge (specified by the manufacturer)
KSH = Superheat correction factor (see Table 9.4.4)
Kµ = Viscosity correction factor (see Figure 9.4.9)
Questions
2. Using the sizing formulae from ASME / API RP 520, calculate the minimum
required orifice diameter for a safety valve discharging superheated steam
under the following conditions:
Relieving temperature 700°F
Discharge quantity 88 500 lb / h
Safety valve coefficient of discharge 0.995
Safety valve set pressure 240 psi g
Safety valve overpressure 10%
Safety valve relieving pressure 278.7 psi a
a| 6.7 in2 ¨
b| 7.3 in2 ¨
c| 7.9 in2 ¨
d| 8.5 in2 ¨
3. Using the sizing formulae from BS 6759, calculate the minimum required
orifice diameter for a safety valve discharging air under the following conditions:
Relieving temperature 50°C
Discharge quantity 28 800 m3 / h
Safety valve coefficient of discharge 0.995
Safety valve set pressure 12 bar g
Safety valve overpressure 5%
a| 18 140 mm2 ¨
b| 11 680 mm2 ¨
c| 49 770 mm2 ¨
d| 52 250 mm2 ¨
6. Determine the minimum required orifice area for a safety valve to be used on
heavy fuel oil (density, r = 980 kg / m3 and viscosity, m = 1.05 Pa s),
under the following conditions, using the BS 6759 standard method of calculation:
Discharge quantity 10 000 kg / h
Safety valve coefficient of discharge 0.71
Safety valve relieving pressure 8 bar a
Backpressure 1 bar a (atmospheric)
a| 90 mm2 ¨
b| 110 mm2 ¨
c| 130 mm2 ¨
d| 150 mm2 ¨
Answers
1:d, 2: b, 3: b, 4: a, 5: d, 6: c
Module 9.5
Safety Valve Installation
Seat tightness
Seat tightness is an important consideration when selecting and installing a safety valve, as not
only can it lead to a continuous loss of system fluid, but leakage can also cause deterioration of
the sealing faces, which can lead to premature lifting of the valve.
The seat tightness is affected by three main factors; firstly by the characteristics of the
safety valve, secondly by the installation of the safety valve and thirdly, by the operation of
the safety valve.
Characteristics of the safety valve
For a metal-seated valve to provide an acceptable shut-off, the sealing surfaces need to have a
high degree of flatness with a very good surface finish. The disc must articulate on the stem and
the stem guide must not cause any undue frictional effects. Typical figures required for an acceptable
shut-off for a metal seated valve are 0.5 mm for surface finish and two optical light bands for
flatness. In addition, for a reasonable service life, the mating and sealing surfaces must have a
high wear resistance.
Unlike ordinary isolation valves, the net closing force acting on the disc is relatively small, due to
there being only a small difference between the system pressure acting on the disc and the spring
force opposing it.
Resilient or elastomer seals incorporated into the valve discs are often used to improve shut-off,
where system conditions permit. It should be noted, however, that a soft seal is often more
susceptible to damage than a metal seat.
Safety valve installation
Seat damage can often occur when a valve is first lifted as part of the general plant commissioning
procedure, because very often, dirt and debris are present in the system. To ensure that foreign
matter does not pass through the valve, the system should be flushed out before the safety valve
is installed and the valve must be mounted where dirt, scale and debris cannot collect.
It is also important on steam applications to reduce the propensity for leakage by installing the
valve so that condensate cannot collect on the upstream side of the disc. This can be achieved by
installing the safety valve above the steam pipe as shown in Figure 9.5.1.
Steam pipe
Where safety valves are installed below the pipe, steam will condense, fill the pipe and wet the
upstream side of the safety valve seat. This type of installation is not recommended but is
shown in Figure 9.5.2 for reference purposes.
Steam pipe
7
If a safety valve is installed
below the steam pipe,
steam can condense and
collect on the upstream
side of the valve seat.
Also, it is essential at all times to ensure that the downstream pipework is well drained so that
downstream flooding (which can also encourage corrosion and leakage) cannot occur, as shown
in Figure 9.5.3.
Vent upwards
Steam pipe
The procedure for testing valves that have been set on air involves blocking all secondary leakage
paths, whilst maintaining the valve at 90% of the set pressure on air (see Figure 9.5.4). The outlet
of the safety valve is connected to a 6 mm internal diameter pipe, the end of which is held 12.7
mm below the surface of water contained in a suitable, transparent vessel. The number of bubbles
discharged from this tube per minute is measured. For the majority of valves set below 70 bar g,
the acceptance criteria is 20 bubbles per minute.
Transparent vessel
½ (12.7 mm)
For valves set on steam or water, the leakage rate should be assessed using the corresponding
setting media. For steam, there must be no visible leakage observed against a black background
for one minute after a three-minute stabilisation period. In the case of water, there is a small
leakage allowance, dependent on the orifice area, of 10 ml per hour per inch of the nominal
inlet diameter.
The above procedure can be time consuming, so it is quite common for manufacturers to employ
a test using alternative methods, for example, using accurate flow measuring equipment that is
calibrated against the parameters set in API 527.
Under no circumstances should any additional load be applied to the easing lever nor should
the valve be gagged in order to increase the seat tightness. This will affect the operating
characteristics and can result in the safety valve failing to lift in overpressure conditions. If there is
an unacceptable level of seat leakage, the valve can be refurbished or repaired, but only by
authorised personnel, working with the approval of the manufacturer, and using information
supplied by the manufacturer.
Commonly supplied spare parts typically include springs, discs and nozzles, resilient seals and
gaskets. Many valves have seat rings which are not removable and these can sometimes be
re-profiled and re-lapped in the body. However, it is important that the size of seat orifice is
maintained exactly in line with the original drawings since this can alter the effective area and,
subsequently affect the set pressure.
It is unacceptable for the disc to be lapped directly onto the seat in the body, since a groove will
be created on the disc preventing a consistent shut-off after lifting.
In the case of resilient seal valves usually the seal (which is normally an O ring or disc) can be
changed in the disc assembly.
If Independent Authority Approval is to be maintained then it is mandatory that the repairer is
acting as the manufacturers approved agent. For ASME approved valves, the repairer must be
independently approved by the National Board and is subsequently allowed to apply a VR
stamp, which indicates a valve has been repaired.
Marking
Safety valve standards are normally very specific about the information which must be carried on
the valve. Marking is mandatory on both the shell, usually cast or stamped, and the name-plate,
which must be securely attached to the valve. A general summary of the information required is
listed below:
On the shell:
o Size designation.
o Flow area.
TÜV
Safety valve
Year of test
Test number
Set pressure (bar g for European valves and psi g for ASME valves)
The Kdr or aW value can vary according to the relevant fluid and is either suffixed or prefixed by
the identification letter shown in Table 9.5.2.
Table 9.5.2 Fluid types defined as steam, gas or liquid
For aW For Kdr
D (dampf) for steam S for steam
G (gase) for gas G for gas
F (flüssigkeiten) for liquids L for liquids
Installation
Safety valves are precision items of safety equipment; they are set to close tolerances and have
accurately machined internal parts. They are susceptible to misalignment and damage if mishandled
or incorrectly installed.
Valves should be transported upright if possible and they should never be carried or lifted by the
easing lever. In addition, the protective plugs and flange protectors should not be removed until
actual installation. Care should also be taken during movement of the valve to avoid subjecting it
to excessive shock as this can result in considerable internal damage or misalignment.
Inlet pipework
When designing the inlet pipework, one of the main considerations is to ensure that the pressure
drop in this pipework is minimised. It is generally recommended in standards that the pressure
drop be kept below 3% of the set pressure when discharging. Where safety valves are connected
using short stub connections, inlet pipework must be at least the same size as the safety valve
inlet connection. For larger lines or any line incorporating bends or elbows, the branch connection
should be at least two pipe sizes larger than the safety valve inlet connection, at which point it is
reduced in size to the safety valve inlet size (see Figure 9.5.5a). Excessive pressure loss can lead
to chatter, which may result in reduced capacity and damage to the seating faces and other
parts of the valve. In order to reduce the pressure loss in the inlet, the following methods can
be adopted:
o Increase the diameter of the pipe. (see Figure 9.5.5 (a)).
o Ensure that any corners are suitably rounded. The BS 6759 standard recommends that corners
should have a radius of not less than one quarter of the bore (see Figure 9.5.5 (b)).
o Reduce the inlet pipe length.
o Install the valve at least 8 to 10 pipe diameters downstream from any converging or diverging
Y fitting, or any bend (see Figure 9.5.5 (c)).
o Never install the safety valve branch directly opposite a branch on the lower side of the steam line.
o Avoid take-off branches (such as for other processes) in the inlet piping, as this will increase the
pressure drop.
Safety valves should always be installed with the bonnet vertically upwards. Installing the valve in
any other orientation can affect the performance characteristics.
The API Recommended Practice 520 guidelines also state that the safety valve should not be
installed at the end of a long horizontal pipe that does not normally have flow through it. This can
lead to the accumulation of foreign material or condensate in the pipe, which may cause
unnecessary damage to the valve, or interfere with its operation.
Outlet pipework
There are two possible types of discharge system open and closed systems. Open system discharge
directly into the atmosphere whereas closed systems discharge into a manifold along with other
safety valves.
It is recommended that discharge pipework for steam and gas systems should rise, whereas for
liquids, it should fall. However, it is important to drain any rising discharge pipework.
Horizontal pipework should have a downward gradient of at least 1 in 100 away from the valve;
this gradient ensures that the discharge pipe is self-draining. However, any vertical rises will still
require separate drainage. Note that any drainage systems form part of the overall discharge system
and are therefore subject to the same precautions that apply to the discharge systems, notably that
they must not affect the valve performance, and any fluid must be discharged to a safe location.
It is essential to ensure that fluid cannot collect on the downstream side of a safety valve, as this
will impair the performance of the valve and cause corrosion of the spring and internal parts.
Many safety valves are provided with a body drain connection, if this is not used or not provided,
then a small bore drain should be fitted in close proximity to the valve outlet (see Figure 9.5.3).
One of the main concerns in closed systems is the pressure drop or built-up backpressure in the
discharge system. As mentioned in Module 9.2, this can drastically affect the performance of a
safety valve. The BS 6759 standard states that the pressure drop should be maintained below 12%
of the set pressure. In order to achieve this, the discharge pipe can be sized using Equation 9.5.1.
/H YJ
G Equation 9.5.1
3
Where:
d = Pipe diameter (mm)
Le = Equivalent length of pipe (m)
m = Discharge capacity (kg / h)
P = Safety valve set pressure (bar g) x Required percentage pressure drop
vg = Specific volume of steam at the pressure (P) (m3 / kg)
The pressure (P) should be taken as the maximum allowable pressure drop according to the
relevant standard. In the case of BS 6759, this would be 12% of the set pressure and it is at this
pressure vg is taken.
Example 9.5.1
Calculate the necessary diameter of the discharge pipework for a safety valve designed to discharge
1 000 kg / h of saturated steam, given that the steam is to be discharged into a vented tank via
the pipework, which has an equivalent length of 25 m. The set pressure of the safety valve is
10 bar g and the acceptable backpressure is 12% of the set pressure. (Assume there is no pressure
drop along the tank vent).
Answer:
If the maximum 12% backpressure is allowed, then the gauge pressure at the safety valve outlet
will be:
[EDUJ EDUJ
Using steam tables, the corresponding specific volume at this pressure is, vg = 0.81 m3 / kg.
/H YJ
Applying Equation 9.5.1: G
3
G [ [ PP
[
Therefore, the pipework connected to the outlet of the safety valve should have an internal
diameter of at least 46 mm.
If it is not possible to reduce the backpressure to below 12% of the set pressure, a balanced safety
valve should be used.
Balanced safety valves require that their bonnets be vented to atmosphere. In the case of the
balanced bellows type, there will be no discharge of the process fluid, so they can be vented
directly to the atmosphere. The main design consideration is to ensure that this vent will not
become blocked, for example, by foreign material or ice. With the balanced piston type,
consideration must be given to the fact that process fluid may be discharged through the bonnet
vent. If discharging to a pressurised system, the vent has to be suitably sized, so that no backpressure
exists above the piston.
Safety valves that are installed outside of a building for discharge directly into the atmosphere
should be covered using a hood. The hood allows the discharge of the fluid, but prevents the
build up of dirt and other debris in the discharge pipework, which could affect the backpressure.
The hood should also be designed so that it too does not affect the backpressure.
Manifolds
Manifolds must be sized so that in the worst case (i.e. when all the manifold valves are discharging),
the pipework is large enough to cope without generating unacceptable levels of backpressure.
The volume of the manifold should ideally be increased as each valve outlet enters it, and these
connections should enter the manifold at an angle of no greater than 45° to the direction of flow
(see Figure 9.5.6). The manifold must also be properly secured and drained where necessary.
For steam applications, it is generally not recommended to use manifolds, but they can be utilised
if proper consideration is given to all aspects of the design and installation.
<45°
Where:
F = Reaction force at the point of discharge to atmosphere (newtons) (see Figure 9.5.4)
m = Discharge mass flowrate (kg / s)
k = Isentropic coefficient of the fluid
T = Fluid temperature (K)
M = Molar mass of the fluid (kg / kmol)
A = Area of the outlet at the point of discharge (mm2) (see Figure 9.5.7)
P = Static pressure at the outlet at the point of discharge (bar g)
¤
A (Area of the outlet at the
¤
Vent pipe
Pressure vessel
The reaction forces are typically small for safety valves with a nominal diameter of less than
75 mm, but safety valves larger than this usually have mounting flanges for a reaction bar on
the body to allow the valve to be secured.
These reaction forces are typically negligible in closed systems, and they can therefore be ignored.
Regardless of the magnitude of the reaction forces, the safety valve itself should never be relied
upon to support the discharge pipework itself and a support should be provided to resist the
weight of the discharge pipework. This support should be located as close as possible to the
centreline of the vent pipe (see Figure 9.5.7).
Figures 9.5.8 and 9.5.9 show typical safety valve installations for both open and closed systems.
Pressure vessel
Fig. 9.5.8 A typical safety valve installation with open discharge system
Vessel
Fig. 9.5.9 A typical safety valve installation with closed discharge system
Changeover valves
Changeover valves (see Figure 9.5.10) permit two valves to be mounted side by side, with one in
service and one isolated. This means regular maintenance can be carried out without interruption
of service or the vessel being protected. Changeover valves are designed in such a way that when
they are operated, the pass area is never restricted.
Changeover valves can also be used to connect safety valve outlets so that the discharge pipework
does not have to be duplicated. The action of both inlet and outlet changeover valves has to be
limited and synchronised for safety reasons. This is usually by means of a chain drive system
linking both handwheels.
Consideration must be made to pressure loss caused by the changeover valve when establishing
the safety valve inlet pressure drop, which should be limited to 3% of the set pressure.
Noise emission
Although discharge from a safety valve should not occur frequently, the noise generated can
often be significant. It is therefore necessary to determine the sound power level of safety valves
to ensure that relevant health and safety regulation levels are not exceeded.
Assuming a sonic flow nozzle discharge, an approximate value of the sound power level, LP, in
decibels at a flange outlet can be calculated using the formula given in Equation 9.5.3.
Where:
LP = Sound power level in dB (A)
m = Mass flow (kg / h)
N5X 7
u = Speed of sound in an ideal gas (m / s), X
0
k = Isentropic coefficient of the gas
Ru = Universal gas constant (8 314 J / kmol K)
T = Absolute gas temperature at the safety valve outlet (K)
M = Molar mass (kg / kmol)
The sound pressure level (L) at a distance (R) is calculated from the sound power level (LP) by
using the formula given in Equation 9.5.4.
Where:
L = Sound pressure level in dB (A)
LP = Sound power level in dB (A)
R = Distance from the source (m)
There are several ways to reduce noise level, the simplest being to use larger diameter discharge
pipes, or to lag the discharge pipe (however, the valve must not be lagged). It is also permissible
for a silencer to be used in extreme cases, in which case any backpressure generated must then
be taken into account.
Questions
3. Which of the following methods could help overcome safety valve chatter
caused by poor inlet pipework design?
i Increase the nominal diameter of the pipes
ii Increase the radius of any corners
iii Increase the pipe length
a| i only ¨
b| ii only ¨
c| i and ii ¨
d| i, ii and iii ¨
Answers
1:b, 2: d, 3: c, 4: d, 5: a, 6: d
Module 9.6
Alternative Plant Protection
Devices and Terminology
Although safety valves are by far the most common devices used for plant protection in steam
systems, there are several other devices available to protect plant from overpressure conditions.
Whilst some of them can be used in place of a safety valve, most have their own unique applications
and indeed some devices, such as the bursting disc, may be used to complement the safety
valve.
o Weighted pallet - This is the simplest type of overpressure protection device, and it is on low-
pressure tanks and condensers, for pressure relief, vacuum relief or both.
A weight is applied to the top of a disc, keeping it closed until the pressure acting on the
underside of the pallet equals the weight. Due to the large weights required to keep a pallet
closed, this type of valve is designed for low pressure applications below 0.1 bar. For higher set
pressures, the weight required would be prohibitive and dangerous if oscillation of the pallet
occurred at valve opening.
o Counterweight safety valve -
Although these have been largely
superseded by spring-loaded safety
valves, they are still sometimes
used for low-pressure applications.
The closing force of the safety valve
is provided by a weight rather than
a spring. As the closing force is
provided by a weight, it will remain
constant and once the set pressure Counterweight
is reached, the safety valve will
open fully.
Flow
o Controlled safety pressure relief systems (CSPRS) - These are electric or electropneumatic
systems, which are not self-acting. When an overpressure situation is detected, a control device
acts to correct the situation.
o Breaking or shear pin devices - A breaking pin device is a non-reclosing pressure relief device
actuated by inlet static pressure and designed to function by the breakage of a load carrying
section of a pin, which supports a pressure-containing member. The force of overpressure forces
the pin to buckle and the valve to open. The valve can then be reseated after the pressure is
removed and a new pin can be installed. These devices are usually installed on low-pressure
applications and large gas distribution systems. They have limited process applications.
Terminology
The following definitions are taken from DIN 3320 but it should be noted that many of the terms
and associated definitions used are universal and appear in many other standards. Where
commonly used terms are not defined in DIN 3320 then ASME / ANSI PTC25.3 has been used as
the source of reference. This list is not exhaustive and is intended as a guide only; it should not
be used in place of the relevant current issue standard:
Operating pressure (working pressure) is the gauge pressure existing at normal operating
conditions within the system to be protected.
Set pressure is the gauge pressure at which under operating conditions direct loaded safety
valves commence to lift.
Test pressure is the gauge pressure at which under test stand conditions (atmospheric
backpressure) direct loaded safety valves commence to lift.
Opening pressure is the gauge pressure at which the lift is sufficient to discharge the
predetermined flowing capacity. It is equal to the set pressure plus opening pressure difference.
Reseating pressure is the gauge pressure at which the direct loaded safety valve is re-closed.
Built-up backpressure is the gauge pressure built up at the outlet side by blowing.
Superimposed backpressure is the gauge pressure on the outlet side of the closed valve.
Backpressure is the gauge pressure built up on the outlet side during blowing (built-up
backpressure + superimposed backpressure).
Accumulation is the increase in pressure over the maximum allowable working gauge pressure
of the system to be protected.
Opening pressure difference is the pressure rise over the set pressure necessary for a lift suitable
to permit the predetermined flowing capacity.
Reseating pressure difference is the difference between set pressure and reseating pressure.
Functional pressure difference is the sum of opening pressure difference and reseating pressure
difference.
Operating pressure difference is the pressure difference between set pressure and operating
pressure.
Lift is the travel of the disc away from the closed position.
Commencement of lift (opening) is the first measurable movement of the disc or the perception
of discharge noise.
Flow area is the cross sectional area upstream or downstream of the body seat calculated from
the minimum diameter which is used to calculate the flow capacity without any deduction for
obstructions.
Flow diameter is the minimum geometrical diameter upstream or downstream of the body seat.
Nominal size designation of a safety valve is the nominal size of the inlet.
Theoretical flowing capacity is the calculated mass flow from an orifice having a cross sectional
area equal to the flow area of the safety valve without regard to flow losses of the valve.
Actual flowing capacity is the flowing capacity determined by measurement.
Certified flowing capacity is actual flowing capacity reduced by 10%.
Coefficient of discharge is the ratio of actual to the theoretical discharge capacity.
Certified coefficient of discharge is the coefficient of discharge reduced by 10% (also known as
derated coefficient of discharge).
The following terms are not defined in DIN 3320 and are taken from ASME / ANSI PTC25.3:
Blowdown (reseating pressure difference) - difference between actual popping pressure and
actual reseating pressure, usually expressed as a percentage of set pressure or in pressure units.
Cold differential test pressure the pressure at which a valve is set on a test rig using a test fluid
at ambient temperature. This test pressure includes corrections for service conditions e.g.
backpressure or high temperatures.
Flow rating pressure is the inlet static pressure at which the relieving capacity of a pressure relief
device is measured.
Leak test pressure is the specified inlet static pressure at which a quantitative seat leakage test is
performed in accordance with a standard procedure.
Measured relieving capacity is the relieving capacity of a pressure relief device measured at the
flow rating pressure.
Rated relieving capacity is that portion of the measured relieving capacity permitted by the
applicable code or regulation to be used as a basis for the application of a pressure relieving
device.
Overpressure is a pressure increase over the set pressure of a pressure relief valve, usually
expressed as a percentage of set pressure.
Popping pressure is the value of increasing static inlet pressure of a pressure relief valve at
which there is a measurable lift, or at which the discharge becomes continuous as determined by
seeing, feeling or hearing.
Relieving pressure is set pressure plus overpressure.
Simmer is the pressure zone between the set pressure and popping pressure.
Maximum operating pressure is the maximum pressure expected during system operation.
Maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) is the maximum gauge pressure permissible at
the top of a completed vessel in its operating position for a designated temperature.
Maximum allowable accumulated pressure (MAAP) is the maximum allowable working pressure
plus the accumulation as established by reference to the applicable codes for operating or fire
contingencies.