Lab Manual
Lab Manual
Lab 01
Basics of Mechanical Behavior
Objectives
1. To understand the what is meant by mechanical behavior of materials
2. To measure and compare the hardness (resistance to penetration) of metallic samples
3. To understand the fundamental concepts of mechanical stress and strain
4. To measure and compare the effects of stress concentration on deformation behavior
Overview
This experiment offers practical experience with two (2) experimental methods that are very commonly used for rapid
and/or elementary assessment of the mechanical properties of materials. They are known as hardness texts, and the
detailed characteristics of the two methods are highlighted and compared. This laboratory also illustrates a much
more complex and critical cause of failure in engineering materials known as stress concentration. Understanding
these elementary concepts and their relationships to the in-service performance of materials is essential for all practic-
ing engineers.
Equipment
Hardness Tests
1. Hardness testers: Rockwell and Brinell
2. Brinell microscope with light source
3. Test specimens: mild steel; stainless steel; aluminum; brass; copper (various thicknesses)
Stress Concentration Measurements
5. Opaque rubber test plate with support frame, weight pan, weights
6. Twelve-inch scale graduated in 50
ths
and 100
ths
; magnifying glass
7. Photoelastic stress analysis equipment and transparent elastomeric plate specimens
Copyright 2014, Berkeley Professor Ronald Gronsky
Lab 01: Basics of Mechanical Behavior
Background
The usefulness of metallic materials in engineering structures often depends upon two mechanical properties: suffi-
cient strength to bear a load, and sufficient ductility to allow the relaxation of stress concentrations through plastic
deformation without fracture. Other factors such as dimensional stability, abrasion resistance, corrosion resistance,
high impact strength, electrical or thermal conductivity, or others can assume importance for specific applications, but
basic mechanical properties are always significant.
At ordinary temperatures, metals, alloys, and many other materials will deform when loaded, and for small loads the
amount of induced deformation is proportional to the magnitude of the applied load. This strain is elastic in nature,
that is, the material will return to its original shape when the load is removed. But at high loads, permanent changes
may occur in the material. With increasing load, a point is reached beyond which irreversible deformation, called
plastic deformation, occurs. Most metallic materials are ductile at room temperature, meaning they can be de-
formed plastically before they fracture. Brittle materials such as glass will fracture, rather than plastically deform,
when the elastic limit is exceeded.
Metallic materials are useful because they can be fabricated easily into complicated shapes by plastic deformation, but
once metallic components have been incorporated into structures, such as wing spars in aircraft, bridge supports, or
bio-implants, further plastic deformation under normal service loads could be disastrous. Consequently, engineers
must base their designs upon the elastic properties of materials used in service, and such parameters as engineering
stress, !, (the load divided by the area supporting the load), engineering strain, ", (change in length divided by original
length), Young's modulus, E, (ratio of stress to strain), and Poisson's ratio, #, (the negative value of the ratio of strain
in the direction perpendicular to the loading direction to the strain in the loading direction).
Hardness can be loosely defined as a material's resistance to deformation, but it specifically refers to a materials re-
sistance to penetration by an indenter. Hardness is one of the easiest mechanical properties of a material to measure,
although it is not the most basic property. For this reason, hardness tests are widely used as a rough guide to the
strength of materials. These tests are rapid and often nondestructive and, therefore, represent an important means of
quality control. Hardness is not a simple property; it depends on a complex set of other material properties. Different
kinds of hardness tests assess these various properties differently, so an exact definition of hardness necessarily de-
pends on the testing method used. The different kinds of hardness tests are not equivalent and cannot be directly
compared. Therefore the information gained from hardness tests on a given material must be interpreted while con-
sidering data obtained from other quantitative measures of mechanical properties, such as the strength. Hardness val-
ues from different materials can only be compared when the hardness tests are carried out under identical procedures
and conditions.
Beyond hardness measurements, this laboratory exercise is also concerned with the elastic behavior of materials and
particularly with the effect that a discontinuity, such as a through-hole in a plate, has upon the distribution of strain
(and therefore stress) in materials. Metallic specimens are not particularly good for demonstrating the elastic behavior
page of 2 10
Lab 01: Basics of Mechanical Behavior
of materials because of their high elastic moduli, which cause the response (strain) to an applied stress to be too small
to see with the naked eye. It is much easier to observe and measure elastic behavior in an elastomeric specimen.
There is a significant difference in elastic behavior between a metal and an elastomer. The relationship between stress
and strain is linear for metals in the elastic range, but it is nonlinear for elastomers. This difference, however, is more
than compensated by the ease with which the relatively large strains can be measured on an elastomeric specimen.
The specimens used for this exercise illustrate the critical stress concentrating effect of a hole in a member subjected
to load. One of the specimens is a plate of opaque black rubber, on which a square grid of lines has been printed so
that strain can be seen and measured at various locations where metallic marker pins have been inserted. Strains in
both the longitudinal and transverse directions are measured at the top and side edges of the hole, and compared to
those along the center line of the specimen, but away from the hole, so that the relationship between stress and strain
can be determined. For rubber this will be non-linear; consequently a single elastic modulus is not enough to describe
the situation.
It will be found that the strains at the edge of the hole are significantly greater than those far away, for the same ap-
plied stress. Since stress and strain are related, it should be evident that the presence of a discontinuity, such as a hole,
produces a stress concentration in the material at the edge of the hole. If stress and strain are linearly related, as
they are in metallic materials, the stress concentration is obtained directly from the ratio of the longitudinal strain at
the edge of the hole to the longitudinal strain in the uniform section far removed from the hole.
The stress concentrating effect of holes, notches, corners, cracks, pits, inclusions, fillets, grooves, threads and other
imperfections (sometimes called stress raisers) is exceedingly important in practical engineering. Drilling holes in a
stressed member for bolting or riveting for example, can lead to local stress concentration exceeding the strength of
the material, resulting in unexpected failure. As another example, consider the effect of cracks, even very small ones,
upon overall strength. The stress concentration at the crack tip may exceed the elastic strength of the material. Unless
this stress (which exists only in a small region at the crack tip) is relieved by plastic yielding, the crack will propagate.
The stress concentration factor, k, (the factor by which the stress is increased over what it would be in a section where
no cracks or other stress raisers are present) is independent of the material, as long as the material is in its elastic
range. It depends on the geometry and on the kind of load (tension, torsion, etc.) that is applied.
Photoelastic observations are sometimes used to determine the stress concentration factor, and the points of maximum
stress concentration, especially in parts of complex shape. Specimens for the photoelastic apparatus used in this labo-
ratory are plates of a special elastomeric polymer through which visible light (photons) can pass. Plane-polarized
light passing through a stressed region is depolarized to different degrees depending on the amount of stress. Since
this process is also wavelength dependent, it is possible to display the stress distribution as a multicolored pattern
(variable wavelength), produced by additional optical elements.
page of 3 10
Lab 01: Basics of Mechanical Behavior
Stress concentration factors are known for many situations. For example, the stress concentration factor (k) for a
crack with tip radius r is
where c is the length of the crack. Clearly, this can become very large. The stress concentration factor for a circular
hole in a plate loaded in tension is k = 3, independent of the hole radius, provided: (1) the plate is thin compared to
the hole diameter; (2) the plate length and breadth are much greater than the hole diameter; and (3) the hole is not lo-
cated near the edge of the plate. A large number of stress concentration factors have been obtained through mathemat-
ical analyses, and through experimental studies, for a variety of shapes and stresses. For additional detail, see for ex-
ample R.E. Peterson, Stress Concentration Design Factors, Wiley, New York, (1953).
Experimental Procedures
Brinell Hardness Test
In your Brinell hardness tests for this lab, a smooth flat specimen surface is indented with a 10 mm diameter (D) steel
ball under a load (P) of 500 kg for soft metals and 3000 kg for the rest. The load is maintained for a standard time,
usually 30 seconds. The indenter is then removed and the diameter (d) of the permanent impression is measured by a
low-power optical microscope. The hardness values are computed from the mean of two diameter measurements at
right angles. The Brinell hardness number (BHN) is obtained by dividing the load by the spherically shaped surface
area of the indentation.
In Brinell hardness measurements the indentation mark is quite large, and may cause damage to finished products,
making this a destructive evaluation method in most cases.
For all Brinell tests, specimens must be flat and securely supported. The specimen must be thick enough so that no
bulge appears on the opposite face during penetration by the indenter and should preferably be ten (10) times as great
in thickness as the depth of the impression. Impressions should not be made within two-and-one-half (2.5) diameters
of the specimen edge and should be at least five (5) diameters from other test impressions. The 500 kg load should be
applied for at least thirty (30) seconds and the 3000 kg load for at least fifteen (15) seconds.
Rockwell Hardness Test
The Rockwell test is more rapid and leaves a smaller and less conspicuous indentation on the specimen than does the
Brinell test. In the Rockwell test the hardness value is an arbitrary number that is inversely related to the depth of the
indentation which results from plastic deformation of the material being tested. The test surface should be flat and
free from scale, oxide films, pits and foreign material that may affect the results. A pitted surface may give erratic
readings, owing to some indentations being near the edge of a depression. This permits a free flow of metal around
page of 4 10
k = 2
r
c
r
BHN =
P
D
2
D
2
d
2
d
2
2
Lab 01: Basics of Mechanical Behavior
The other is the actual indentation area (Ai) with hemispherical-cap shape, given by the expression
These are the equations that should be programmed into your spreadsheet to complete DataSheet 1.
DataSheet 2 Rockwell Hardness
Data recorded in the lab should be retrieved from your lab notebook to construct DataSheet 2 as a spreadsheet with at
least the seven (7) columns shown here, and as many rows as needed to present three (3) trials and averages for all
samples studied. Note that the last column is the topic of Question 1, and asks for the conversion of the Rockwell
hardness number measured in your experiments to an equivalent Brinell hardness number. No calculations are re-
quired; conversion tables are found in the laboratory.
DataSheet 3 Stress Concentration
DataSheet 3 records the total applied load (P) in units of pounds added to the weight tray suspended from the opaque
rubber plate sample, and the measured distances between location pins on the plate. Please remember that the first set
of measurements should be made for P = 0. When retrieved from your lab notebook, these data are entered into a
spreadsheet programmed to generate additional columns, such as those listed here. Again this is a minimum number
Material Trial # Scale Major Load Minor Load Hardness Conversion
1
2
3
Average
1
2
3
Average
Load,P
(lbs)
y
(in)
y
(in)
x
(in)
x
(in)
Nominal
stress
(psi)
Local
stress
(psi)
Nominal y
strain
(in/in)
Local y
strain
(in/in)
Nominal x
strain
(in/in)
Local x
strain
(in/in)
page of 8 10
A
i
=
D
2
D
p
D
2
d
2
Figure 3 Schematic of strain resulting from
a uniaxial stress applied along the y-direction
as illustrated for a plate with a through-hole.
The x-direction is horizontal.
Figure 4 Schematics of
solid plate with through-
hole subjected to biaxial
state of stress
Write down the expressions for "y and "x when the same part is subject to a biaxial stress state, that is, both !x and !y,
as illustrated in Fig. 4. Hint: the principle of superposition applies here. Begin by writing the equations for the
strains when only !x is applied, add the equations for the strains when only !y is applied (above), and simplify.
page of 10 10
y
=
1
E
y
x
=
E
y