Simultaneous Fault
Simultaneous Fault
Trovato
IR. Bualoti
Abstract A g c n e r a l ~ emethod
~
for simultaneous h i &
analysis in electrical powm ,system is proposed in this paper.
The method is based on,tha: admittance-type represcrahtiori
of power-system sequencc' networks. After defining suitable:
boundary conditions for' :series faults in t e r m of bus
quantities, the reduced negative and zero sequcnce equation!;
at the faulted buses are determined. Then, a siniplc
procedure is suggested for obtaining the augmented positive
sequence admittance ma,trix of the faulted power system.
The suggested procedure prows useful to analyze any
combination of faults without limit of number, type
(balanced or unbalanced), phase, or locatioii of fault.
Moreover, sparse-matrix techniques arid optinl;rlly
reordered triangular factorisation can be easily implemented
to optimize the computer resources. The method can bc
easily integrated in exist. calculation progranis tIrroargb a
separate subroutine.
A simple test -system is considered to illustrate thc
potentials o f the suggested1 procedure.
I. INTIXXXJCTION
In the last two decade,?,several methods for calculating
simultaneous faults in electrical lpwer systems lime k e n
proposed [1-9], based on sequence-domain 11-41 or phasedomain E5-71frame reprwmtation.
In [I] a general approach is suggested in the sequence
domain. The multiple-pwt network theory is applied to
obcain an equivalent passive network which is coiisidcretl
as a connected part of the posilivc scqtiencc network
Then, an augmented pos itive-sequsnce network (APSN) is
developed in terms of admittance- or impedance-type [Zl
representation.
In [ZJ,an alternative a,pproach which uses [lie phasc
frame models of network eieineuts is pl-oposed.foistudying simultaneous faults on basically uinbalaicecl
power systems.An appiaach with combines Uie mosl
relevant advantages of the previous nnenlioned approaches
is lhe two-step compensation nnetliod [&9] The basic idea
of this method is to consider a fault colidition as I;
modilicarion of paramei.ers of branches of UIC prefaulll
network.
In this paper a gcneriilized procedure in the sequcnce
domain frame representation is suggested for analyzirng
simultaneous faults. In particular, attention is paid to Uia
manner in which the twc' ports network matrix equation is
transformed from hybrid to homogeneous. This involves,
in addition, a suitable inodification of unbalanced open
circuit bounday condiiions. Expressing the sequencc:
0-7803-31-09-S/96/$5.00
1996 IEEE
'721
where:
If, I p r are the sequence port currents respectively <<fn
bus current and c<FF'* branch current;
Vf is the voltage at the left port equal to the c r h bus
voltage;
VW is the voltage at the right port equal to the
difference between the two bus voltages ccF~and
<<F'>>;
Y1 is the node driving point admittancc;
Y22 is the branch driving point admittance;
Y12=Yzlare the node-to-branch transfer admittances.
It can be observed that the admittance matrix in eqn.(1)
is hybrid. In order to obtain the equ.(l) in a homogeneous
form the multipole network represented in Fig. 2 is
considered and, at the same time, the fault boundary
conditions are modified as follows.
. .
t Fault &xU"ll The shunt fault is
considered as an injected current If leaving ctf)) bus as in
Fig.2.The direction of current flowing into bus is taken as
the positive one. The current source at <<f)>bus is Jf = -If
and the bus voltage is V,. The boundary condition$ of the
shunt faults are identical to those Considered in 111.
rype of fault
h e Line
)pen 1 LO
._F/F'
b
Two Lines
3pen 2LO
b2.J-
F F'
/yb=(i
h e e Lines
&en
3LO
F/F'
722
B. Mathematical Model
Let us consider for the power system the following
n=nl+n2 simultaneous fau It events:
n l balanced and unbalanced short circuit (solid or
through impedancc).
n2 balanced and ur,balanced open circuil (partial
or complete action cd breaker poles).
As we mentioned in the previous paragraph Uie short
circuit is characterized by one faulted bus while the open
circuit by two ones. The number of faultcd buscs (the so
called pseudo-active buses) in the gencral case of a faulted
power system for the three sequences arc:
NI = N2 = No =
1
VN,
c13
c14
c15
c16
c21
c22
c23
c24
c2S
c26
c31
c32
c33
c34
c3S
c36
cl1 cl2
vN2
IN1
+ 2.112
-cl1
cl2
c13
c14
clS
cl6-
c21
c22
c23
c24
c25
C26
c32
c33
c34
c3S
c36
YNNZ
0
0
c31
Y N N ~0
1
0
- IN,
-'ll
1' 2
1' 3
1' 4
'15
'16-
'22
'23
'24
2' 5
'26
'33
0
0
0
0
0
0
'34
'35
'36
D44
'45
D46
'55
'56
VN,
=O
(8)
vN2
'NI
-vN1
(4)
where:
Y N N m . VN,
where:
YN"
= - [Nm
(in = 2,O)
YNNm = YNNm
. YRNr~i
(5)
(5.a)
Yl<R1
72 3
yVN
yRNl
l+Ysh
[vRl]
vN1
I;:[
(11)
Pl
In
T3
IF0
IFo+IF2+IF1=0
Vfq - vyo = vF1- VF1
Vm - VF2 = VFl - vi:,,
J5
0
0
+ 1172 = 0
+ Ipso = 0
SYSTEM
(C )
GI
E3
negative sequence:
-j20 j5
724
j5
-j20 0
0
0 -jl0 0
0
0 -j5
jl0 0 jS
jl0
j5
j5
-jlS
- zero sequence:
-j14 j2 j2
j2 -j17 0
0
0
0
0
j5
0
0
0
j5
j 2 0 j5
j S -j20
j5
-j2.5 j2.5
VFO
j2.5 -j7.5 - -Vfo
-j8.666
0 j0.666
j0.666 j5 -j9.666
0 j5
0 j2.5 -j7.5
-jl1.76
j0.085
jCI.0SS
-j25
j2.5
j2!S
-j.5.684
j2
j2 -j17
0 Oj5
= 0
-j5.170
j5.170
j2.413
0
jl0
V. CONCLUSIONS
and
Y N N ~ =-j12
[ 0 -j2.5
0 j l 5 ] - jii :],[-j14
=[ 0
jS
j5.170
j5.170
-j2.413
j2.413
j2.413
j3.045
][
725