Handbook For Inspection of Ships and Issuance of Ship Sanitation Certificate
Handbook For Inspection of Ships and Issuance of Ship Sanitation Certificate
Handbook For Inspection of Ships and Issuance of Ship Sanitation Certificate
CONTENTS
Foreword
Acknowledgments
GLOSSARY
Acronyms
13
INTRODUCTION
15
SCOPE
17
19
1. Overview of legal and policy framework
2. Roles and responsibilities
2.1 Role of competent authority
2.2 Role of conveyance operators
2.3 Role of inspecting officers
3. Pre-inspection planning and administrative arrangements
for issuing ship sanitation certificates
3.1 General preparation and administrative arrangements for
issuing ship sanitation certificates
3.2 Planning for on-site inspection
4. Measures and operational procedures for ship inspection
and the issue of ship sanitation certificates
4.1 Documentation review
4.2 Inspection process
4.3 Taking samples
4.4 Issue of certificates
5. Control Measures
6. Other relevant international agreements and instruments
20
21
22
23
24
24
37
Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5
Area 6
Area 7
Area 8
38
42
55
60
64
71
76
85
Quarters
Galley, pantry and service areas
Stores
Child-care facilities
Medical facilities
Swimming pools and spas
Solid and medical waste
Engine room
25
26
26
27
28
29
30
34
35
Area 9
Area 10
Area 11
Area 12
Area 13
Annex 1
Potable water
Sewage
Ballast water
Cargo holds
Other systems and areas
International Health Regulations (2005)
Annex 2
Algorithm for issuance of ship sanitation certificates,
handling of re-inspections and affected conveyances
Annex 3
Sequence of inspection areas
Annex 4
Personal protective equipment for inspectors and crew
Annex 5
Technical equipment useful to perform a ship inspection
Annex 6
Model documents for ship inspection
Annex 7
Evidence Report Form
Annex 8
Instructions for completing the Evidence Report Form
References and resources
88
109
117
122
125
131
135
136
137
139
141
142
143
Foreword
On 23 May 2005, the Fifty-eighth World Health Assembly adopted the International
Health Regulations (IHR) (2005), and the Deratting Certificate/Deratting Exemption Certificate required by the IHR (1969) was replaced by the broader-scope ship sanitation
certificates (SSCs), which came into force on 15 June 2007.
The IHR (2005) states that parties can authorize certain ports to issue the SSCs and their
extensions, as well as to provide the services referred to in Annex 1 of the regulations.
The authorized ports should have, among other capacities, trained personnel available
to board a ship and to identify any significant risk to public health, as well as to take
control measures. Thus, it is imperative to have a global, standardized operational procedure for inspecting ships.
After the IHR (2005) took effect in June 2007, the World Health Organization (WHO),
Health Security and Environment (IHR ports, airports and ground crossings) developed
the Interim technical advice for inspection and issuance of ship sanitation certificates.
This technical advice, which was published in August 2007, assists States Parties to manage ship inspection and issue SSCs.
This document, Handbook for inspection of ships and issuance of ship sanitation certificates (the handbook), replaces the previous interim technical advice, and reflects the
need for a common understanding of the purpose and scope of the application of SSCs
worldwide. It is an important tool for helping to prevent and control known public health
risks (not just rodents), and provides a common way to register and communicate events
and measures taken on board. The handbook is intended to raise conveyance operators
awareness and response to public health events, and provide the opportunity for routine
verification of health status on board at least twice each year.
This handbook may be used in conjunction with the Guide to ship sanitation (WHO, 2011)
and the International medical guide for ships (WHO, 2007), which are oriented towards
preventive health and curative health, respectively, on board ships.
The handbook was developed through an iterative series of drafting and peer-review
steps. The following expert meetings were held to revise the handbook:
informal Transportation Working Group Meeting for Ship Sanitation Certificates, Lyon,
France, 68 November 2007;
informal Transportation Draft Working Group Meeting on procedures for inspection
and issuance of ship sanitation certificates, Lyon, France, 1719 December 2007;
informal consultation for draft on procedures for inspection and issuance of ship sanitation certificates, Lyon, France, 1416 April 2008;
meeting on recommended procedures for inspection and issuance of ship sanitation
certificates, Lyon, France, 1415 April 2009;
informal consultation meetings for the ship sanitation guidelines, Lyon, France, 1216
October 2009.
A public consultation version of this handbook was posted on the WHO website in May
2010. During the course of meetings and peer review, participants and experts from represented cruise ship operators, seafarer associations, collaborating Member States for
the IHR (2005), Port State Control, port health authorities and other regulatory agencies
were involved from diverse developing and developed countries. The acknowledgements section contains a complete list of contributors.
From 2008 to 2010, several workshops and field activities were held at the subregional, regional and interregional level. Experts from all WHO regions participated, and the
workshops provided an opportunity to revise previous interim technical advice and test
the new draft handbook using training exercises onboard ships. The workshops and field
activities were supported by WHO regional and country offices, as well as public health
authorities in different countries, including Sines, Portugal (2009); Santos (2008), Fortaleza
(2010), Brazil; Palma de Majorca (2008), Cartagena (2009), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
(2010), Spain; Amsterdam, the Netherlands (2007); Hamburg, Germany (2008); Miami,
United States of America (2008); Bridgetown, Barbados (2008); Manila, the Philippines
(2009); Colombo, Sri Lanka (2010); and Paris, France (2009).
Acknowledgments
This handbook was developed in consultation with experts from diverse developing and
developed countries.
The work of the following individuals was crucial to the development of this edition of
the Handbook for inspection of ships and issuance of ship sanitation certificate and is
gratefully acknowledged:
Jaret T. Ames, Vessel Sanitation Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
Atlanta, United States of America
James Barrow, Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, National Center for Preparedness, Detection, and Control of Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, Atlanta, United States of America
Marie Baville, Environment Health Officer, Department of Emergency Response and Preparedness, General Directorate of Health, Ministry of Health, Paris, France
Priagung Adhi Bawono, Quarantine Sub-directorate, Directorate General Disease Control
and Environmental Health, Ministry of Health, Jakarta, Indonesia
David Bennitz, Public Health Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Canada
Colin Browne, Pan American Health Organization/Eastern Caribbean Countries, Bridgetown, Barbados, World Health Organization
Luiz Alves Campos, National Health Surveillance Agency (Anvisa), Brasilia, Brazil
Susan Courage, Environmental Health Bureau, Safe Environments Directorate
Health Canada, Canada
Yves Chartier, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
Frdric Douchin, Departmental Directorate of Health and Social Affairs of the Seine
Maritime, France
Zhiqiang Fang, Department of Health Quarantine of General Administration of Quality
Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, Beijing, China
Milhar Fuazudeen, Maritime Training and Human Element Section, Maritime Safety Division, International Maritime Organization, London, United Kingdom
Christos Hadjichristodoulou, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
Daniel Lins Menucci, WHO, Lyon, France
Hameed Gh H Mohammad, Ports and Borders Health Division, Rumaithiya, State of
Kuwait
Rosemarie Neipp, General Directorate for Public Health and Foreign Health Affairs,
Ministry of Health and Social Policy, Spain
Ma Lixin, Department of Health Quarantine of General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, Beijing, China
Henry Kong, Port Health Office, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
5
GLOSSARY
Acceptable non-rat-proof material
A material with a surface that is treated (flashed) to be resistant to rat gnawing when
the edges are exposed to gnawing (the gnawing-edges), but that is subject to penetration by rats if the gnawing-edges are not treated.
Accessible
Capable of being exposed for cleaning and inspection with the use of simple tools, such
as a screwdriver, pliers or an open-ended wrench.
Affected
Persons, baggage, cargo, containers, conveyances, goods, postal parcels or human remains that are infected or contaminated, or carry sources of infection or contamination,
so as to constitute a public health risk.
Affected area
A geographical location specifically for which health measures have been recommended
by WHO under International Health Regulations (2005)
Airbreak
A piping arrangement in which a drain from a fixture, appliance or device discharges
indirectly into another fixture, receptacle or interceptor at a point below the flood-level
rim.
Airgap
The unobstructed vertical distance through the free atmosphere between the lowest
opening from any pipe or faucet supplying water to a tank, plumbing fixture or other
device and the flood-level rim of the receptacle or receiving fixture. The air gap should
typically be at least twice the diameter of the supply pipe or faucet, or at least 25 mm.
Backflow
The flow of water or other liquids, mixtures or substances into the distribution pipes of a
potable supply of water from any source or sources other than the potable water supply.
Back-siphonage is one form of backflow.
Backflow preventer
A mechanical device installed in a water or waste line to prevent the reversal of flow
under conditions of back pressure. An approved backflow-prevention plumbing device
is typically used on potable water distribution lines where there is a direct connection or
a potential connection between the potable water distribution system and other liquids,
mixtures or substances from any source other than the potable water supply. Some devices are designed for use under continuous water pressure, whereas others are non-pressure types. In the check-valve type, the flap should swing into a recess when the line is
flowing full to preclude obstructing the flow.
Back-siphonage
The backward flow of used, contaminated or polluted water from a plumbing fixture or
vessel or other source into a water-supply pipe as a result of negative pressure in the
pipe.
7
Black water
Waste from toilets, urinals or medical facilities.
Biohazard bag
Bag used to secure biohazard waste that requires microbiological inactivation in an
approved manner for final disposal. Must be disposable and impervious to moisture,
and have sufficient strength to preclude tearing or bursting under normal conditions of
usage and handling.
Child care facility
Facility for child-related activities where children are not yet out of diapers or require
supervision using the toilet facilities, and are cared for by vessel staff.
Cleaning
Removal of visible dirt or particles through mechanical action, reducing the microbial
environment population through the application of chemical, mechanical or thermal processes for a certain period of time.
Closed joints, seams and crevices
Those where the materials used in fabrication of the equipment join or fit together
snugly. Suitable filling materials may be used to effect a proper closure.
Communicable disease
Diseases caused by pathogenic microorganisms, such as bacteria, viruses, parasites or
fungi. The diseases can be spread, directly or indirectly, from one person to another.
Zoonotic diseases are communicable diseases of animals that can cause disease when
transmitted to humans.
Competent authority
Authority responsible for implementing and applying health measures under the International Health Regulations (2005).
Corrosion-resistant
Capable of maintaining original surface characteristics under prolonged influence of the
use environment, including the expected food contact and the normal use of cleaning
compounds and sanitizing solutions. Corrosion-resistant materials must be non-toxic.
Coved
A concave surface, moulding or other design that eliminates the usual angles of 90
degrees or less.
Cross-connection
Any unprotected actual or potential connection or structural arrangement between a
public or a consumers potable water system and any other source or system through
which it is possible to introduce into any part of the potable system any used water,
industrial fluid, gas or substance other than the intended potable water with which the
system is supplied. Bypass arrangements, jumper connections, removable sections,
swivel or change-over devices and other temporary or permanent devices through which,
or because of which, backflow can occur are considered to be cross-connections.
Disease
An illness or medical condition, irrespective of origin or sources, that presents or could
present significant harm to humans.
Disinfection
The procedure whereby measures are taken to control or kill infectious agents on a human or animal body, on a surface or in or on baggage, cargo, containers, conveyances,
goods and postal parcels by direct exposure to chemical or physical agents.
Easily cleanable
Fabricated with a material, finish and design that allows for easy and thorough cleaning
with normal cleaning methods and materials.
Flashing
The capping or covering of corners, boundaries and other exposed edges of
acceptable non-rat-proof material in rat-proof areas. The flashing strip should typically be of rat-proof material, wide enough to cover the gnawing-edges adequately and
firmly fastened.
Food contact surfaces
Surfaces of equipment and utensils with which food normally comes in contact, and surfaces from which food may drain, drip or splash back onto surfaces normally in contact
with food. This includes the areas of ice machines over the ice chute to the ice bins.
Food display areas
Any area where food is displayed for consumption by passengers and/or crew.
Food handling areas
Any area where food is stored, processed, prepared or served.
Food preparation areas
Any area where food is processed, cooked or prepared for service.
Food service areas
Any area where food is presented to passengers or crew members (excluding individual
cabin service).
Food storage areas
Any area where food or food products are stored.
Free pratique
The permission for a ship to enter a port, embark or disembark, discharge or load cargo
or stores.
Grey water
All used water, including drainage from galleys, dishwashers, showers, laundries, and
bath and washbasin drains. It does not include black water or bilge water from the machinery spaces.
Halogenation
In this context, halogenation refers to disinfection using halogen disinfectants, such as
chlorine, bromine or iodine, to treat recreational water or potable water to reduce the
concentration of pathogenic microorganisms.
9
International voyage
(a) In the case of a conveyance, a voyage between points of entry in the territories of
more than one state, or a voyage between points of entry in the territory or territories of
the same state if the conveyance has contacts with the territory of any other state on its
voyage, but only as regards those contacts.
(b) In the case of a traveller, a voyage involving entry into the territory of a state other
than the territory of the state in which that traveller commences the voyage.
National IHR Focal Point
The national centre, designated by each State Party, which shall be accessible at all times
for communication with WHO IHR Contact Points.
Non-absorbent materials
Materials with surfaces that are resistant to moisture penetration.
Non-food contact surfaces
All exposed surfaces, other than food contact or splash contact surfaces, of equipment
located in food storage, preparation and service areas.
Perishable food
A food that is natural or synthetic and that requires temperature control because it is in
a form capable of supporting:
the rapid and progressive growth of infectious or toxigenic microorganisms;
the growth and toxin production of Clostridium botulinum; or, in raw shell eggs, the
growth of Salmonella enteritidis.
Personal protective equipment (PPE)
Equipment used to create a protective barrier between the worker and the hazards in
the workplace.
Point of entry
A passage for international entry or exit of travellers, baggage, cargo, containers,
conveyances, goods and postal parcels, as well as agencies and areas providing services
to them on entry or exit.
Portable
A description of equipment that is readily removable or mounted on casters, gliders or
rollers; provided with a mechanical means so that it can be tilted safely for cleaning; or
readily movable by one person.
Potable water
Fresh water that is intended for human consumption, drinking, washing, teeth brushing,
bathing or showering; for use in fresh-water recreational water environments; for use
in the ships hospital; for handling, preparing or cooking food; and for cleaning food
storage and preparation areas, utensils and equipment. Potable water, as defined by the
WHO Guidelines for drinking-water quality (2008) does not represent any significant risk
to health over a lifetime of consumption, including different sensitivities that may occur
between life stages.
10
The common method of sewage treatment is to flush sewage from toilets through a
piping system into a holding tank where it is comminuted, decanted and broken down
by naturally occurring bacteria in an aerobic process, and disinfected before it is discharged into the open sea. It is important to consider that an excessive use of cleaners
and disinfectant in the sewage system may destroy the natural bacteria in the treatment
plant. The aerobic process needs oxygen. Therefore, aerators blow air into the biological
compartment. Toxic gases can be produced during the process.
Ship
A seagoing or inland navigation vessel on an international voyage (IHR, 2005).
Ship water system
On-board treatment equipment and facilities, water storage tanks, and all the plumbing
and fixtures on the ship.
Smooth
A food contact surface that is free from pits and inclusions, with a cleanability equal to
or exceeding that of (100 grit) number 3 stainless steel.
A non-food contact surface that is equal to commercial grade hot-rolled steel and is
free from visible scale.
A deck, bulkhead or deck head that has an even or level surface with no roughness or
projections that render it difficult to clean.
Surveillance
Systematic ongoing collection, collation and analysis of data for public health purposes,
and the timely dissemination of public health information for assessment and public
health response as necessary.
State Party
Under the International Health Regulations, States Parties are those states that have
become bound by the revised International Health Regulations (2005).
Traveller
Natural person taking an international voyage.
Turbidity
Cloudiness or lack of transparency of a solution due to presence of suspended particles.
Typically measured in nephelometric turbidity units (NTU).
Vector
An insect or other animal that normally transports an infectious agent that constitutes a
public health risk.
Verification
Final monitoring for reassurance that the system as a whole is operating safely. Verification may be undertaken by the supplier, by an independent authority or by a combination of these, depending on the administrative regime of a given country. Typically
includes testing for faecal indicator organisms and hazardous chemicals.
12
Acronyms
BWMP
CAC
FAO
FSP
GDWQ
HACCP
HPC
IHR
ILO
IMGS
IMO
ISM manual
ISO
MFAG
Medical first aid guide for use in accidents involving dangerous goods
(International Maritime Organization)
PPE
SSC
SSCC
SSCEC
UV
ultraviolet
WHO
13
14
INTRODUCTION
The International Sanitary Regulations were first adopted in 1951. In 1969, they were
renamed as the International Health Regulations (IHR). The 1951 IHR were intended to monitor
and control six serious infectious diseases: cholera, plague, yellow fever, smallpox, relapsing
fever and typhus. In the intervening 50 years, many developments affected the international
transmission of disease, including changes in international ship traffic. Therefore, on 23 May
2005, the World Health Assembly adopted a revised IHR by way of resolution WHA58.3, which
entered into force on 15 June 2007.
Beginning with the 1951 IHR, the Deratting Certificate/Deratting Exemption Certificate was
a required document for the international public health control of ships visiting international
ports. The Deratting Certificate helped to reduce the international spread of rodent-borne
diseases, especially plague. All ships on international voyages were required to renew this
certificate every six months, and this renewal required all areas of the ship to be inspected. In
the IHR (2005), the Deratting Certificate/Deratting Exemption Certificate was replaced by the
much broader ship sanitation certificates (SSCs) and was no longer valid after 2007.
The IHR (2005) SSCs are of particular importance for the prevention and control of public
health risks on board ships on international voyages. They provide internationally recognized
documentation regarding the sanitary conditions of a ship, while reducing the need for further
and more frequent inspections of the ship during the period for which the certificate is valid
(but with options for additional inspections under certain limited circumstances).
This handbook is intended to be used as reference material for port health officers, regulators,
ship operators and other competent authorities in charge of implementing the IHR (2005) at
ports and on ships. The handbook is based on the IHR (2005) provisions regarding ship inspection and issue of SSCs. They provide guidance for preparing and performing the inspection,
completing the certificates and applying public health measures within the framework of the
IHR (2005).1
1. IHR Article 2, purpose and scope: to prevent, protect against, control and provide a public health response to the international
spread of disease in ways that are commensurate with and restricted to public health risks, and which avoid unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade.
15
16
Scope
SSCs are used to identify and record all areas of ship-borne public health risks (not limited to
rodents).2 They require the application of comprehensive and detailed inspection procedures
and techniques by personnel who are trained in public health issues. The relevant IHR (2005)
provisions include Articles 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 40, 41, 42,
43, 44 and 45, and Annexes 1, 3, 4 and 5.
SSCs emphasize the criteria to be considered during the inspection of areas of the ship. They
also provide information for determining which public health measures should be adopted to
prevent and control public health risks on board, in turn preventing the international spread
of disease. At the completion of the inspection, a new SSC should be issuedeither a Ship
Sanitation Control Exemption Certificate or a Ship Sanitation Control Certificate, according
to the results of the inspection. If the inspection cannot be accomplished at an authorized
port (listed on the World Health Organization [WHO] website), the existing certificate may
be extended by no more than one month (this must also be done at an authorized port). As
provided in the regulations, when an SSC is issued, there is no distinction as to nationality, flag,
registry or ownership of the ship.
Part A of this document is a reference for pre-inspection planning and administrative arrangements for issuing the Ship Sanitation Control Exemption Certificate or the Ship Sanitation
Control Certificate. Part A describes activities that are the responsibility of port health officers,
and national or local public health authorities. These activities maintain adequate standards
for ship inspection and issue of SSCs.
Part B of this document is a template for the inspection and issue of SSCs. It describes the
areas to be inspected; the relevant standards that apply; the possible evidence that may be
found or sample results that could constitute a public health risk; the documentation that
must be reviewed before, during and after the inspection process; and control measures or
corrective actions that must be taken. The format of this template follows the IHR model SSC
in Annex 3 of the IHR (2005). Part B may also be used as reference material for regulators, ship
operators and ship builders, and serve as a checklist for understanding and assessing the
potential health impacts of projects involving the design of ships.
Throughout this document, references are provided on occupational health issues for ships
crews or other events that affect public health, and inspections applicable to items of IHR Annex 3. References are also provided on the prevention and control of events that may constitute a public health event of international concern (as defined in the IHR).
This handbook also addresses environmental issues that may constitute public health risks,
such as the discharge by ships of sewage, waste and ballast water. Harmful contamination
(other than microbial contamination), such as from radionuclear sources, could also be found
on ships. Such contamination is subject to the IHR (2005) and the requirements of Article 39
and Annex 3; however, specific control measures are outside the scope of this handbook. This
2. IHR Annex 3 provides a comprehensive list of areas, facilities and systems to be inspected with a view to issue of an SSC.
17
handbook only address the adoption of preliminary control measures, and the mobilization of
specialized experts and agencies to respond to radiological events if detected on board.
In summary, Parts A and B of this document have been developed to assist the competent
authority at the port in determining:
recommended competencies for the personnel inspecting ships for the issue of SSCs;
administrative arrangements for routine enquiries for the planning of ship inspection and
issue of SSCs;
methods of identification, measurement and control of public health risks related to ships,
travellers, cargo or discharge;
procedures relating to the prevention of international spread of disease;
recording of information on the SSC, including for further action by the ships crew or the
competent authorities at future ports of call;
communication and response requirements for events of public health concern, including
incidents and emergencies on board.
The Guide to ship sanitation (WHO, 2011) and the International medical guide for ships (WHO,
2007) are companion volumes to this document, oriented towards preventive health and curative health, respectively, on board ships.
18
Part A:
Inspection system
requirements
19
20
certificates that do not conform to the model may be viewed by other competent
authorities as invalid or may be invalid according to the IHR (2005).
Use of the template does not impose any obligation on the ship, other than those
prescribed by the IHR (2005).
SSCs may be used as international communication tools and will usually be delivered
in countries (or, sometimes, regions) other than the place of issue. Therefore, States
Parties should usually issue and complete the certificates in English or in French.
(b) in the case of a ship, the evidence found and the control measures shall be noted
in the SSCC (IHR [2005] Article 27.2).
Therefore, ports should have the capacity to support the control measures adopted
to prevent the spread of disease and disease agents. Such measures include cleaning,
disinfection, decontamination, deratting and disinsection.
A port on the WHO list of ports authorized to issue SSCs should also have available
trained personnel who can board ships, identify any significant risks to public health
and take appropriate control measures. Thus, States should have nationally recognized training and competency requirements for public health or environmental health
officers assigned to issue SSCs.
Subject to IHR (2005) Article 43, or as provided in applicable international agreements,
ships shall not be refused free pratique by States Parties for public health reasons. In
particular, they shall not be prevented from embarking or disembarking; discharging
or loading cargo or stores; or taking on fuel, water, food and supplies. States Parties
may subject the granting of free pratique to inspection and, if a source of infection or
contamination is found on board, the carrying out of necessary disinfection, decontamination, disinsection or deratting, or other measures necessary to prevent the spread
of the infection or contamination (IHR [2005] Article 28).
If the public health risk appears significant or if evidence of potential international
spread of disease exists, the National IHR Focal Point and community-level health
authorities should be alerted immediately by the competent authority.
take all practicable measures consistent with these regulations to monitor and control
the discharge by ships of sewage, refuse, ballast water and other potentially diseasecausing matter that might contaminate the waters of a port, river, canal, strait, lake or
other international waterway;
be responsible for supervising service providers for services concerning travellers,
baggage, cargo, containers, conveyances, goods, postal parcels and human remains
at points of entry, including the conduct of inspections and medical examinations as
necessary;
have effective contingency arrangements to deal with an unexpected public health
event;
communicate with the National IHR Focal Point on the relevant public health measures
taken pursuant to these regulations.
23
2. The ships master must ascertain the health status on board before arrival at port. The master must also deliver to the competent
authority a complete Maritime Declaration of Health, which should be countersigned by the ships surgeon (if one is on board),
unless the competent authority does not require a declaration (include Article 37 and Annex 8; see WHO interim technical advice
for case management of pandemics [H1N1] on ships).
24
25
Inspections are designed to confirm that ships are operating in accordance with appropriate practices for assessment and control of health risks on board.
An inspection provides a snapshot of a ships operations and the manner in which
its systems are implemented and maintained. The inspecting officer should typically
identify risks that arise from the activities on the ship, and the effectiveness of the
ships own assessment of risks and control measures. Both the quality of operating
procedures and the extent of their implementation should be assessed. Specifically,
the inspection should determine whether the ships operator and/or master have identified relevant hazards, assessed health risks and identified suitable control measures
to effectively manage those risks.
With regard to the issue of SSCs, a port should have appropriately trained personnel
available to board a ship, identify any significant public health risks and order control
measures. Before boarding, inspectors need to comply with all necessary administrative and technical procedures to ensure efficient and safe access to the ship. They
should also follow procedures to ensure a reasonable level of safety while the ship is in
dock, when boarding and during onboard inspections.
If a new certificate is to be issued, all areas must be inspected. The areas must be in a
condition that prevents cross-contamination by the inspection process (e.g. as described in Annex 3).
26
Before an inspection begins, the ships master should, if possible, be informed of the
purpose of the inspection, be advised to prepare all the required documentation and
be instructed to provide a contact person on board to facilitate the inspection.
An inspection usually includes a preliminary discussion with the ships operator or
agent and the master on matters relating to the ships sanitation systems and procedures. Additionally, the relevant documentation sent to the master or representative by
the competent authority before the inspection should be reviewed.
If a ships risk assessment and risk management systems are unsatisfactory, evidence
of implementation is inadequate, or unforeseen potential hazards are identified, the
inspection officer should discuss these matters with the master at the conclusion of the
visit. The discussion may include previous inspection reports, relevant current documentation and all food- and water-related activities undertaken on the ship.
Subsequently, a summary of the matters that do not comply with this document or with
other associated technical documents (e.g. the WHO Guide to ship sanitation) should
be confirmed in writing by the officer on the Evidence Report Form (see Annex 7). The
officer should also note the relevant advice given, including an expected timeframe
for any corrective action.
If control measures are noted on the existing SSCC or on an existing Evidence Report
Form (see Annex 7), the inspection shall verify that these measures have been successfully implemented.
If the conditions under which the inspection and/or control measures are performed
are incompatible with obtaining satisfactory results, the competent authority shall
make a note to that effect on the SSCC.
27
The Maritime Declaration of Health (see model provided in IHR [2005] Annex 8)
contains basic data relating to the state of health of crew and passengers during the
voyage and on arrival at the port, and provides valuable information on:
identification of the ship;
ports of call within past 30 days (to be listed);
all crew members and travellers within past 30 days (to be listed);
validity of the existing SSC and whether re-inspection is required;
affected areas visited.
The SSC (see model provided in IHR [2005] Annex 3) identifies all areas of public health
risks and any required control measures to be applied.
The International Certificate of Vaccination or Prophylaxis (see model provided in IHR
[2005] Annex 6) verifies that crew members and passengers have been vaccinated according to entry requirements.
The following documents, according to the document list in the Convention on Facilitation of International Maritime Traffic 1965 (as amended 2006), may be requested by
the competent authority to assess public health risk:
a General Declaration, to ascertain the ships name, type and flag State; it also provides valuable information on the ships requirements in terms of waste and residues,
reception facilities and brief particulars of voyage;
a Cargo Declaration and Ships Stores Declaration, for information on the cargo (e.g.
port of loading and discharge, description of goods);
a Dangerous Goods Manifest, which details information on dangerous goods (e.g.
subsidiary risk(s), mass, stowage position on board).
The following additional sources of information may be required, if appropriate, for
assessment of public health risk:
management plans concerning, for example, water bunkering, food safety, pest
control, sewage or waste;
an IMO Ballast Water Reporting Form;
a medical log, for information on incidents on board the ship that may constitute
health events under the IHR (2005);
a list of medicines, providing information on the kinds and amounts of medicines
carried in the medical chest;
a Potable Water Analysis Report, which provides the results of any microbiological
examinations or chemical analyses of potable water on board.
The competent authority should develop protocols and procedures for the transmission of pre-arrival and pre-departure information, to effectively process the required
information.
While performing inspections on board or in port areas, inspectors must wear appropriate
identification, clothing and PPE, including, but not limited to, life jackets, safety helmets,
safety boots, high-visibility clothing, respiratory and noise (ear) protection, rubber gloves, protection goggles, face masks (FFP3) and single-use overalls, as required.
Previous identification and security clearance of port authorities and ship operators
should be granted before starting the inspection.
Generally, the inspector starts the inspection by introducing the team and outlining
the objective of the inspection to the master. The inspector then receives information
about operating conditions and safety rules on board from the master. This exchange
should occur in a private space, if available. The inspection process is then outlined to
the master, and the documentation in place is reviewed.
The order of inspection (see Annex 3) is at the inspectors discretion. However, crosscontamination from inspection activities should be avoided. Therefore, personal hygiene, cleanliness of clothes and the inspectors health status should be considered.
If a new certificate is to be issued, all areas have to be inspected. If the ships holds are
in use, the cargo should also be inspected, if applicable, especially for presence of vectors. If enough personnel are available in the inspection team, team members can be
assigned different areas for inspection. The aim is to achieve all the objectives of the
inspection, taking into consideration the availability of time, the number of inspectors,
and the size and type of the ship.
The areas for inspection, the kind of evidence sought, the potential sources of information and the appropriate control measures to be taken are identified in the checklists
of this handbook. This handbook can help identify deficiencies and non-compliance
before completing the certificate.
29
In general, when clinical signs or symptoms of illness or disease are present, evidence
of a public health risk (including sources of infection and contamination) is found on
board, or a public health risk is definitively identified, the competent authority determines the appropriate public health measures to be applied for an adequate level
of control. Methods or materials advised by WHO for these measures should be employed, unless the competent authority determines that other methods are similarly
safe and reliable.
30
31
An extension allows a ship to reach a port at which the inspection and necessary
control measures can be performed, without the necessity to travel with an expired
certificate.
An extension may be granted up to 30 days before the expiry date of the existing SSC.
However, the SSC cannot be extended for longer than 30 days after the expiry date
(IHR [2005] Article 39).
Use of an extension stamp similar to that shown below is recommended to ensure
a common standard among competent authorities. Place the stamp on the existing
certificate.
4.4.4 E
vidence Report Form
The Evidence Report Form (see Annex 7) can be used to document evidence of public
health risks found during an inspection, and also the prescribed control measures or
corrective actions. The words required and recommended are used, according to
the evidence found, samples tested and documents reviewed. The inspecting officer
then submits the SSC and attached Evidence Report Form to the ships master. If a report form is used, a note is made on the SSC. Use of an attachment stamp similar to
that shown below is recommended to ensure a common standard among competent
authorities.
32
33
After a re-inspection of the ship in the next port to check that the control measures
required by the previous competent authority have been performed, and that the
measures have been verified as effective, notes to that effect must be made on the
attachment. The ship shall then cease to be regarded as an affected conveyance
under IHR (2005) Article 27, unless other public health risks were discovered on the reinspection. The original validity date of the exemption certificate remains unaffected,
unless a full inspection is performed and a new certificate issued, with the agreement
of the master of the ship.
5. Control measures
Once the public health risks have been identified based on the information or evidence
found, the competent authority should determine appropriate control measures
and consider the adequacy of existing control measures. Public health risks can be
controlled by a variety of means. The competent authority should enforce reasonable
and practicable control measures, according to the risk assessment. Unnecessary
or excessive measures should be avoided. In addition, the availability of technical
resources and reasonable costs should be considered when assessing options for
control.
When a public health risk exists, control measures that will reduce the risk to an
acceptable level should be identified. The conveyance operator is responsible for
controlling any onboard risks. Nevertheless, the competent authority should provide
reasonable assistance to identify suitable and relevant control options.
Control measures for public health risks on ships should be applied only after all key
parties (i.e. the master, the conveyance operator or agent and the port authorities
involved in this activity) have been fully informed of the intended methods. Critical
activities, such as the designation of port areas for quarantine of ships suspected of
carrying a public health risk, should be identified well in advance, in cooperation with
the port operator for ship movement. The schedule of work to be performed should
be confirmed with the ships supervisory crew members and noted in any corrective
actions.
The methods suggested for detecting and measuring public health risks on ships (in
Part B of this document) are based on information from existing guidelines, WHO
State Party experts, international organizations and the shipping industry.
Disinsection, decontamination, deratting, disinfection and other sanitary procedures
taken pursuant to the IHR (2005) shall be performed in a manner that avoids injury and,
as far as possible, discomfort to persons. Also, environmental damage that affects
public health, baggage, cargo, containers, conveyances, goods or postal parcels
should be avoided (IHR [2005] Annex 4B.1). As far as practicable, facilities used by
travellers at points of entry should be maintained in a sanitary condition and kept
free from sources of infection or contamination, including vectors and reservoirs (IHR
[2005] Article 22.2). These measures shall be initiated and completed without delay,
and applied in a transparent and non-discriminatory manner (IHR [2005] Article 42).
34
35
36
PART B:
CHECKLISTS FOR
SHIP INSPECTION
37
Area 1 Quarters
Introduction
The operator is accountable for maintaining a safe environment on board for crew and
passengers. As the IHR (2005) and other relevant international agreements should be interpreted in a compatible manner (Article 57), quarters for crew members should comply with
existing conventions on crew accommodation and food and catering in the ILO conventions. For ships constructed before July 2006, all crew accommodation should comply with
the Accommodation of Crews Convention (Revised) 1949 No. 92 and the Accommodation
of Crews (Supplementary Provisions) Convention 1970 No. 133. For ships constructed after
July 2006, accommodation should comply with the Maritime Labour Convention 2006.
Main risks
Factors contributing to the occurrence of public health risks on board include the design,
construction, management and operation of quarters.
Document review
Construction drawings of sanitary facilities and ventilation.
Cleaning procedures and logs.
Construction plans demonstrating how cross-contamination is avoided in specified clean
and dirty areas.
Smoke tests at exhaust and at air intakes close to exhaust.
References
International conventions
ILO, Maritime Labour Convention 2006.
Scientific literature
Barker J, Stevens D, Bloomfield SF (2001). Spread and prevention of some common viral
infections in community facilities and domestic homes. Journal of Applied Microbiology,
91(1):721.
38
Black RE et al. (1981). Handwashing to prevent diarrhea in day-care centers. American Journal of Epidemiology, 113(4):445451.
Carling PC, Bruno-Murtha LA, Griffiths JK (2009). Cruise ship environmental hygiene and
the risk of norovirus infection outbreaks: an objective assessment of 56 vessels over 3 years.
Clinical and Infectious Diseases, 49:13121317.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2001). Influenza B virus outbreak on a cruise
shipNorthern Europe, 2000. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 50:137140.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2002). Outbreaks of gastroenteritis associated
with noroviruses on cruise shipsUnited States. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report,
51:11121115.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2003). Norovirus activityUnited States, 2002.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 52:4145.
Chimonas MA et al. (2008). Passenger behaviors associated with norovirus infection on
board a cruise shipAlaska, May to June 2004. Journal of Travel Medicine, 15:177183.
Corwin AL et al. (1999). Shipboard impact of a probable Norwalk virus outbreak from coastal
Japan. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 61:898903.
Cramer EH, Blanton CJ, Otto C (2008). Shipshape: sanitation inspections on cruise ships,
19902005, Vessel Sanitation Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Journal
of Environmental Health, 70:1521.
Depoortere E, Takkinen J (2006). Coordinated European actions to prevent and control
norovirus outbreaks on cruise ships. Euro Surveillance: European Communicable Disease
Bulletin, 11:E061018.
Enserink M (2006). Infectious diseases. Gastrointestinal virus strikes European cruise ships.
Science, 313:747.
Hansen HL, Nielsen D, Frydenberg M (2002).Occupational accidents aboard merchant
ships. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 59(2):8591.
Herwaldt BL et al. (1994). Characterization of a variant strain of Norwalk virus from a
foodborne outbreak of gastroenteritis on a cruise ship in Hawaii. Journal of Clinical
Microbiology, 32:861866.
Ho MS et al. (1989). Viral gastroenteritis aboard a cruise ship. The Lancet, 2:961965.
Lang L (2003). Acute gastroenteritis outbreaks on cruise ships linked to Norwalk-like viruses.
Gastroenterology, 124:284285.
Lawrence DN (2004). Outbreaks of gastrointestinal diseases on cruise ships: lessons from
three decades of progress. Current Infectious Disease Reports, 6:115123.
ONeill HJ et al. (2001). Gastroenteritis outbreaks associated with Norwalk-like viruses and
their investigation by nested RT-PCR. BMC Microbiology, 1:14.
Verhoef L et al. (2008). Multiple exposures during a norovirus outbreak on a river-cruise
sailing through Europe, 2006. Euro Surveillance: European Communicable Disease Bulletin,
13(24)pii:18899.
Widdowson MA et al. (2004). Outbreaks of acute gastroenteritis on cruise ships and on land:
identification of a predominant circulating strain of norovirusUnited States, 2002. Journal
of Infectious Diseases, 190:2736.
39
Recommended
Required
Code of
Areas
1.1 Construction
1.1.1
Surfaces and fixtures not proAccommodation should be constructed of maperly sealed or difficult to
terial that is easily sealed and cleaned.
clean.
1.1.2
Accommodation constructed of
unsuitable material that creates All accommodation to be kept free from vector
conditions for potential infesta- entry.
tion by vectors.
1.1.3
Adequate ventilation system or properly screeNo window available or ventila- ned window should be in place, especially in
tion system inadequate, which sleeping rooms and mess rooms, to prevent
affects the health of occupants. the spread of disease. Adjust ventilation dependent on climate in which ship is sailing.
1.1.4
o
No heating system.
1.1.5
o
Sleeping rooms for crew or pas- Provide separate sleeping rooms constructed
sengers constructed from infer- of steel or other approved substance; rooms
must be watertight and gas-tight.
ior materials.
1.1.6
o
1.1.7
o
1.1.8
o
External doors or windows not Construct doors that open outward and are
self-closing.
vector-protected.
1.1.9
o
1.1.10
o
1.1.11
o
1.1.12
o
40
Recommended
Required
Code of
Areas
1.2 Equipment
1.2.1
1.2.2
Toilet facilities
equipped.
1.2.3
insufficiently
1.3.2
o
1.3.3
o
Contamination by chemicals or
Apply decontamination measures.
other agents.
1.3.4
o
Toilet leaks or overflows, or Maintain toilet system free from leaks and baccross-connection exists.
kups.
1.3.5
o
1.3.6
o
1.3.7
o
Provide laundry facilities with appropriate equipment for laundry treatment, storage and distribution (clean and dirty circuits well defined).
Perform disinfection and appropriate disinsection or deratting measures.
o
o
1.4 Lighting
1.4.1
o
Natural or artificial lighting in- Provide artificial lighting when adequate natusufficient.
ral light not available.
1.5 Ventilation
1.5.1
o
41
42
(c) galley and other equipment for the preparation and service of meals; and
(d) the qualification of such members of the catering department of the crew as is required by such laws or regulations to possess prescribed qualifications.
Article 7: National laws or regulations or, in the absence of such laws or regulations, collective agreements between employers and workers shall provide for inspection at sea at
prescribed intervals by the master, or an officer specially deputed for the purpose by him,
together with a responsible member of the catering department of:
(a) supplies of food and water;
(b) all spaces and equipment used for the storage and handling of food and water, and
galley and other equipment for the preparation and service of meals.
The results of each such inspection shall be recorded.
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point system (HACCP)
HACCP is noted as a system to identify and monitor the critical control points in the food
manufacturing and distribution chain, including the source and stockpile. At these critical
points, control is essential to prevent, eliminate or reduce a hazard and to take corrective
action. Food safety plans or programmes (FSPs) are required to manage the process of
providing safe food. Typically, the FSP is based on the HACCP system.
Main risks
Foodborne diseases have been associated with loading poor-quality food. Nevertheless,
even if the loaded food is safe, this does not ensure that the food will remain safe during
the storage, preparation, cooking and serving activities that follow on board. The main
risks to food safety in the galley, pantry and service areas are related to the following:
Biological hazards (bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites)
Biological hazards occur when bacteria, viruses, moulds, yeasts or parasites contaminate
food. These organisms are commonly associated with humans and with raw products entering food preparation sites. Therefore, raw ingredients in the galley are high-risk factors.
Storage time and temperature of food, and awareness and implementation of hygienic
practices by food handlers on board ship also play significant roles in food safety.
Chemical hazards (e.g. cleaning agents)
Chemical contamination of food may inadvertently occur naturally before loading or
during processing (e.g. by the misuse of cleaning chemicals or pesticides). Examples of
naturally occurring chemicals are mycotoxins (e.g. aflatoxin), scombrotoxin (histamine),
ciguatoxin and shellfish toxins.
Equipment and utensils
The equipment and utensils contacting food are designed and constructed to ensure
that, when necessary, they can be adequately cleaned, disinfected and maintained to
avoid the contamination of food. Equipment and containers are typically made of materials with no toxic effects when used as intended. Where necessary, equipment should
be durable and movable, or capable of being disassembled to allow for maintenance,
cleaning, disinfection, monitoring and inspection for pests.
43
Document review
Cleaning schedule and logs.
Purchase records and shipboard documentation of food sources (wrapping or other
identification on the packaging, or a written product identification sheet).
Food storage inout record.
Drainage construction drawings.
Previous inspection reports.
Pest logbook with information on sightings.
Temperature records for food storage, cooling logs and thermometer readings.
References
International conventions
ILO, Maritime Labour Convention 2006.
Scientific literature
Addiss DG et al. (1989). Outbreaks of diarrhoeal illness on passenger cruise ships, 197585.
Epidemiology and Infection, 103:6372.
Berkelman RL et al. (1983). Travelers diarrhea at sea: two multi-pathogen outbreaks caused by food eaten on shore visits. American Journal of Public Health, 73:770772.
Boxman IL et al. (2009). Environmental swabs as a tool in norovirus outbreak investigation,
including outbreaks on cruise ships. Journal of Food Protection, 72:111119.
Cliver D (2009). Control of viral contamination of food and environment. Food and Environmental Virology, 1:39.
Couturier E et al. (2009). Cluster of cases of hepatitis A with a travel history to Egypt, SeptemberNovember 2008, France. Euro Surveillance: European Communicable Disease
Bulletin, 14(3) pii:19094.
Cramer EH, Blanton CJ, Otto C (2008). Shipshape: sanitation inspections on cruise ships,
19902005, Vessel Sanitation Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Journal of Environmental Health, 70:1521.
Cramer EH, Gu DX, Durbin RE (2003). Diarrheal disease on cruise ships, 19902000: the
impact of environmental health programs. American Journal of Preventive Medicine,
24:227233.
Cramer EH et al. (2006). Vessel sanitation program environmental health inspection team.
Epidemiology of gastroenteritis on cruise ships, 20012004. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30(3):252257.
Herwaldt BL et al. (1994). Characterization of a variant strain of Norwalk virus from a foodborne outbreak of gastroenteritis on a cruise ship in Hawaii. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 32:861866.
Hobbs BC, Colbourne MJ, Mayner PE (1975).Food hygiene and travel at sea. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 51:817824.
Lawrence DN et al. (1979). Vibrio parahaemolyticus gastroenteritis outbreaks aboard two
cruise ships. American Journal of Epidemiology, 109:7180.
Lew JF et al. (1991). An outbreak of shigellosis aboard a cruise ship caused by a multiple-antibiotic-resistant strain of Shigella flexneri. American Journal of Epidemiology,
134:413420.
Mouchtouri VA et al. (2008). Surveillance study of vector species on board passenger
ships, risk factors related to infestations. BMC Public Health, 8:100.
44
Rooney RM et al. (2004). A review of outbreaks of foodborne disease associated with passenger ships: evidence for risk management. Public Health Reports, 119(4):427434.
Said B et al. (2009). Hepatitis E outbreak on cruise ship. Emerging Infectious Diseases,
15:17381744.
Sasaki Y et al. (2006). Multiple viral infections and genomic divergence among noroviruses during an outbreak of acute gastroenteritis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 44:790
797.
Snyder JD et al. (1984). Outbreak of invasive Escherichia coli gastroenteritis on a cruise
ship. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 33:281284.
Waterman SH et al. (1987). Staphylococcal food poisoning on a cruise ship. Epidemiology
and Infection, 99(2):349353.
Guidelines and standards
WHO, Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point System (HACCP) (http://www.who.int/foodsafety/fs_management/haccp/en/)
Recommended international code of practicegeneral principles of food hygiene, CAC/
RCP 1-1969, Rev. 4-2003. CAC
45
Recommended
Required
Code of
Areas
2.1.1
2.1.2
2.1.3
o
2.1.4
o
2.1.5
o
2.1.6
o
No food safety training programmes or documented evi- Formulate and implement training programme
dence that crew have under- and set up training log.
gone training.
2.2.1
o
46
Post signage that indicates location of handwashing station, and proper hand-washing
technique and time.
2.2.2
Recommended
Required
Code of
Areas
2.2.3
2.2.4
o
Install or repair tight-fitting doors or similar proTight-fitting doors or similar tective closures for openings to ice bins, food
protective closures not availa- display cases, and other food- and ice-holding
facilities to prevent contamination of stored
ble or not functioning.
products.
2.2.5
o
2.2.6
o
2.3.1
o
2.3.2
o
2.3.3
o
2.3.4
o
2.3.5
o
2.3.6
o
Provide artificial lighting if adequate natural light not available to properly evaluate sanitary
conditions.
2.3 Facilities
47
2.3.7
o
Unprotected lighting over food Install or fix lighting fixtures to ensure food is
preparation areas.
not contaminated by glass breakage.
2.3.8
o
2.3.9
o
2.3.10
o
Repair or replace damaged surfaces and equipment to ensure they are non-toxic, durable,
corrosion resistant, non-absorbent, smoothly
finished and easy to clean, to prevent crosscontamination.
2.4.2
o
48
Recommended
Required
Code of
Areas
Recommended
Required
Code of
Areas
2.4.3
2.4.4
Maintain correct temperatures for storing perishable foods to prevent food entering the danger zone for microbial growth, as follows:
Place food held hot in a hot-holding apparatus already at a temperature of at least 62.8C
(145F) and maintain at that temperature until
required.
Reheat cooked, cooled, perishable food for
hot-holding until all parts of the food reach a
temperature of at least 74 C (165 F). Maintain
temperature until required.
Store perishable foods and drinks at, or below, 4 C (40 F), except during preparation or
when held for immediate serving after preparation. When such foods are stored for extended periods, a temperature of 4 C (40 F) is
recommended.
Usually store fruits and vegetables in cool
rooms.
2.4.5
2.4.6
Food handlers or galley crew Treat wounds with waterproof dressings. Wear
members have exposed cuts disposable gloves if wounds become infected;
apply medical treatment immediately.
and wounds.
2.5.1
2.5.2
2.5.3
Expired food.
o
o
49
Recommended
Required
Code of
Areas
2.6.2
o
2.7.1
o
2.7.2
o
50
Handle, use and store cleaning chemicals caEvidence of improper cleaning refully, in accordance with manufacturers insprocedures and improper use of tructions.
cleaning chemicals and disinfecImplement a checklist system for scheduled
tants.
cleaning of all necessary items.
2.7.3
o
2.7.4
2.7.5
2.7.6
2.7.7
2.7.8
Recommended
Required
Code of
Areas
2.8.1
2.8.2
51
Temperature on receiving
Condition on receiving
5 C (41 F) or below.
Seafood
Shellfish
Crustacea
(unprocessed)
7 C (45 F) or below.
Crustacea
(cut or processed)
5 C (41 F) or below.
Dairy products
Shell eggs
7 C (45 F) or below.
Liquid eggs
5 C (41 F) or below.
52
Operation
a)
Cooking
Portioning
Milk (Code of Hygienic Practi- 72C for 15 seconds (continuous flow pasc) ce for Milk and Milk Products, teurization), or 63 C for 30 minutes (batch
CAC/RCP 57, 2004)
pasteurization).
a) Chilling
b) Storage
Kept at or below 18 C.
Temperature control
a) Chilled product
Chilling and
storage of
chilled food
a) Freezing
Freezing
and storage
conditions
b) Storage
for frozen
food
Recommended
Process
Required
53
Transport
Designed to maintain temperature of alreaVehicles and containers in- dy chilled (cooked) food, not to chill food.
b) tended for transporting coo- Ideally, maintain temperature of foods at 4
ked-and-chilled food.
C, but temperature may rise to 7 C for a
short period during transport.
a) Reheating.
Reheating
and service
b) Service.
54
Temperature control
Recommended
Operation
Required
Process
Area 3 Stores
Introduction
The above risk factors applicable to galleys also apply to the food stores, as food stores are
not only areas for food storage, but also contain counters and equipment for food or drink
preparation, limited cooking and ware washing used for temporary food storage.; often,
however, counters and equipment for food or drink preparation, limited cooking and ware
washing are used for temporary food storage. Review all galley sections above for application to pantries of standards, evidence and corrective actions in all general categories of
food safety.
Non-food stores include spaces designed for storage of non-food items, such as cleaning
equipment, chemicals and other non-food equipment or supplies for support of food areas.
Appropriately and hygienically managed stores limit potential for soiling of clean supplies
and attraction and breeding of pests (i.e. non-food stores should be clean, organized, well
stocked and well run). Storage areas should be appropriately labelled.
55
(b) all spaces and equipment used for the storage and handling of food and water, and galley
and other equipment for the preparation and service of meals.
The results of each such inspection shall be recorded.
Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC)
The Codex Alimentarius is a collection of internationally adopted uniform food standards. It also
includes provisions of an advisory nature in the form of codes of practice, guidelines and other
recommended measures to assist in achieving the purposes of the Codex Alimentarius (CAC
1995; 1997a, b; 1999; 2003). The CAC guidance provides important information on basic food
safety, which will be referred to throughout this section.
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point system (HACCP)
HACCP is noted as a system to identify and monitor the critical control points in the food manufacturing and distribution chain, including the source and stockpile. At these critical points,
control is essential to prevent, eliminate or reduce a hazard and to take corrective action. Food
safety plans or programmes (FSPs) are required to manage the process of providing safe food.
Typically, the FSP is based on the HACCP system.
Main risks
The major risks include bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites in, or on, food due to the improper
storage of foods. For example:
foods placed on the deck;
improper holding temperatures in cold stores;
eggs, fish, meat and poultry not separated from ready-to-eat foods (e.g. lunch meats from cut
melons, salads and other ready-to-eat foods);
washed and unwashed fruits and vegetables not separated.
Improper storage of chemicals is another risk.
Document review
Cleaning and maintenance schedule and logs.
Purchase records and shipboard documentation of food source (e.g. wrapping or other identification on packaging, or written product identification sheets).
Food storage inout records.
Construction drawings
Previous inspection reports.
Pest logbook with information on sightings.
Records of food storage temperatures, cooling logs and thermometer readings.
References
International conventions
ILO, Maritime Labour Convention 2006.
Scientific literature
Cramer EH, Gu DX, Durbin RE (2003). Diarrheal disease on cruise ships, 19902000: the impact of
environmental health programs. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24:227233.
McEvoy M et al. (1996). An outbreak of viral gastroenteritis on a cruise ship. Communicable
Disease Report CDR Review, 6:R188R192.
Rooney RM et al. (2004). A review of outbreaks of foodborne disease associated with passenger
ships: evidence for risk management. Public Health Reports, 119:427434.
Guidelines and standards
Codex Alimentarius Commission (http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/index_en.jsp)
WHO, HACCP (Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point System)
(http://www.who.int/foodsafety/fs_management/haccp/en/)
56
Recommended
Required
Code of
Areas
3.1 Construction
3.1.1
o
Reconstruct to ensure protection against weather and sea, insulation from heat or cold and
Poorly designed construction for separation from other spaces.
protection against weather and
sea.
Reconstruct to ensure that room is visually clean and
structurally sound.
3.1.2
o
Openings or damage.
Soiled stores.
3.2.2
o
3.2.3
o
3.3.1
o
Foods found spoiled or unpa- Obtain all foods consumed on board from
ckaged.
reputable sources ashore (i.e. sources approved or considered satisfactory by the relevant
Containers or packaging have health administration).
no source or suspicious source
Verify food quality and safety when purchasing:
identifications.
clean, free from spoilage and adulteration, safe
Supervisory food crew mem- for human consumption. Do not accept raw
bers cannot provide satisfactory materials and ingredients if known to contain
details of sources and countries parasites; undesirable microorganisms, pestiof origin to enable tracing if a cides, veterinary drugs or toxins; decomposed
or extraneous substances; unless contaminants
poisoning occurs
can be reduced to an acceptable level by routine sorting or processing.
Discard spoiled foods.
3.4 Storage
3.4.1
o
Food and non-food, or raw and Separate food and non-food stores. Clearly
prepared products not sepa- segregate storage of raw and prepared prorate.
ducts.
57
3.4.2
o
Disordered stores.
3.4.3
o
3.4.4
o
3.4.6
o
58
Recommended
Required
Code of
Areas
Recommended
Required
Code of
Areas
3.6.1
o
Evidence of absence or inadeImprove training in correct use of cleaning chequate knowledge of correct use
micals.
of cleaning chemicals.
3.6 Training
o
59
Background information
Types of child care that may be offered on board passenger ships include:
care of infants and preschool children who are not toilet-trained and need supervision by
staff, including changing diapers;
care of children who are toilet-trained;
provision and supervision of public playgrounds.
Main risks
Ill-designed child-care facilities, lack of training for carers and inappropriate prevention and
control procedures may pose a risk to all crew and passengers on board. General public
health may also be at risk when children return to their communities.
Critical areas for controlling risks are:
size, ventilation and lighting of child-care facilities;
materials and cleanliness of surfaces of furniture, carpets and toys;
diaper changing, hand-washing facilities and toilets;
food preparation areas;
training of crew in sanitation procedures, with an emphasis on hand washing;
immunization of children and crew;
communication procedures concerning notification of disease;
isolation measures, including exclusion of sick children and crew from child-care facilities;
methods to manage symptomatic passengers (such as isolation in cabin or departure
from ship) to improve compliance with control measures.
Document review
Required documents are:
written procedures and policies on cleaning, maintenance and waste management;
written guidance on control measures if symptoms of infection occur in children; guidelines will include handling of body fluids, record keeping, notification of disease, communication, outbreak management and exclusion policies in case of illness;
vaccination list of child-care staff.
60
References
International conventions
ILO, Maritime Labour Convention 2006.
Scientific literature
Carling PC, Bruno-Murtha LA, Griffiths JK (2009). Cruise ship environmental hygiene and
the risk of norovirus infection outbreaks: an objective assessment of 56 vessels over 3 years.
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 49:13121317.
Chimonas MA et al. (2008). Passenger behaviors associated with norovirus infection on
board a cruise shipAlaska, May to June 2004. Journal of Travel Medicine, 15:177183.
Cliver D (2009). Control of viral contamination of food and environment. Food and Environmental Virology, 1:39.
Cramer EH, Gu DX, Durbin RE (2003). Diarrheal disease on cruise ships, 19902000: the impact of environmental health programs. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24:227
233.
McCutcheon H, Fitzgerald M (2001). The public health problem of acute respiratory illness
in childcare. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 10(3):305310.
61
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
Child-care facilities not appro- Provide child care in a space of appropriate size
priate in size and location.
and location.
4.1.2
4.1.3
4.1.4
o
Potable water and handwashing facilities not available Install appropriate washbasin with hot and cold
and/or not appropriate for use potable water.
by children.
4.1.5
o
4.1.6
o
4.1.7
o
4.2.1
o
4.3.1
o
62
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
Basic cleaning plan not maintained or carrying out the cleaning Provide, observe and maintain cleaning plan.
plan not documented.
4.4.2
4.4.3
Written procedures for removal Provide, observe and maintain waste manageof waste not available.
ment plan.
4.4.4
o
Evidence of disease vectors Disinfect, derat and apply insecticides, as apand/or reservoirs found.
propriate.
4.6 Vaccinations
4.6.1
o
63
64
IMO, International Convention on Standards, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers 1978, as amended 1995 (STCW 95)
This convention is an international standard concerning the mandatory training of seafarers.
Main risks
Medical facilities need to be designed, equipped and maintained so that person-to-person
spread of disease is prevented. All ships subject to the regulations established by the IMO
and the ILO are required to follow training standards and carry a medical chest. The MFAG
names specific medications and equipment that are mandatory for ships carrying dangerous goods. Beyond these requirements, no formal international instruments specify the
contents of the medical chest, the design of medical facilities or operational manuals and
protocols. The IMGS includes a suggested list of medications and equipment to be carried.
A number of national maritime authorities further specify the contents and design of medical facilities plus the training of crew designated to onboard medical care.
Areas and standards to minimize the risk of spread of disease that concern medical facilities
are as follows:
1. Medical facilities designed for accommodation of ill crew and passengers
Facilities must:
be easily accessible and separated from other activities, particularly from food-storage
and food-handling areas, and from spaces for waste;
facilitate private treatment of ill travellers;
be clean, well ventilated and well lit;
provide adequate space for isolation of ill travellers;
be properly maintained with potable water, and toilet and hand-washing facilities;
not be used for other purposes.
2. Crew members designated to work in medical facilities
Staff must:
be trained in basic medical first aid in accordance with STCW 95;
include credentialed medical staff (physician and nurses) for ships carrying more than 100
people, in accordance with the Maritime Labour Convention 2006;
provide evidence of attendance at approved training courses observing SCTW 95 criteria;
demonstrate knowledge and competence by observed practices, such as adequate record keeping.
3. Medications and medical equipment
Supplies must:
include all medications, personal protective equipment, medical devices and disinfectants sufficient to diagnose, treat and control public health risks according to the ships
size, number of travellers and voyage pattern;
meet the recommendations and requirements of the IMGS and MFAG as a minimum.
Medications must:
be given to travellers and crew only by trained and authorized personnel;
be accompanied by adequate dispensory records.
65
Document review
Required documents are:
up-to-date ships log and/or medical logbook, including treatment list;
crew member interviews if the medical log is not available during inspection or entries
are inadequate; if written information is required, request Maritime Declaration of Health
from the State Party;
training and certification of staff assigned to medical care;
lists of medicines, vaccines, disinfectants and insecticides;
number of passengers, mix of patients (passenger ships only), medical equipment in
place and procedures performed, depending on ships voyage pattern and size;
cleaning, sanitation, maintenance and waste policies and procedures;
specific disease surveillance logs (e.g. gastrointestinal disease), where applicable;
operational manuals for high-risk facilities and devices such as an intensive-care unit,
blood transfusion facility, operating theatre or haemodialysis facility;
specimens collected and results if disease occurs on board; if possible, international
certificates of vaccination or prophylaxis.
66
References
International conventions
ILO, Maritime Labour Convention (2006).
ILO, IMO, WHO (2008). International medical guide for ships, 3rd edition
(http://apps.who.int/bookorders/anglais/detart1.jsp?sesslan=1&codlan=1&codcol=15&co
dcch=3078).
IMO, Medical first aid guide for use in accidents involving dangerous goods.
IMO, International Convention on Standards, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers
1978, as amended in 1995, chapter VI.
Scientific literature
Anonymous] (2002). Norovirus activityUnited States, 2002. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly
Report, 52:4145.
[Anonymous] (2003). The healthy traveler: cruising past infection. Johns Hopkins Medical Letter:
Health After 50, 15:6.
Brotherton JM et al. (2003). A large outbreak of influenzaA and B on a cruise ship causing
widespread morbidity. Epidemiology and Infection, 130:263271.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1999). Preliminary guidelines for the prevention
and control of influenza-like illness among passengers and crew members on cruise ships.
Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Cramer EH et al. (2006). Epidemiology of gastroenteritis on cruise ships, 20012004. American
Journal of Preventative Medicine, 30:252257.
Cramer EH, Gu DX, Durbin RE (2003). Diarrheal disease on cruise ships, 19902000: the impact
of environmental health programs. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 24:227233.
Dahl E (2004). Dealing with gastrointestinal illness on a cruise shipPart 1: Description of
sanitation measures. Part 2: An isolation study. International Maritime Health, 55:1929.
Dahl E (2005). Medical practice during a world cruise: A descriptive epidemiological study of
injury and illness among passengers and crew. International Maritime Health, 56:115128.
Dahl E (2006). Norovirus challenges aboard cruise ships. International Maritime Health, 57:230
234.
Enserink M (2006). Infectious diseases. Gastrointestinal virus strikes European cruise ships.
Science, 313:747.
Ferson MJ, Ressler KA (2005). Bound for Sydney town: health surveillance on international
cruise vessels visiting the Port of Sydney. Medical Journal of Australia, 182:391394.
Herwaldt BL et al. (1994). Characterization of a variant strain of Norwalk virus from a foodborne outbreak of gastroenteritis on a cruise ship in Hawaii. Journal of Clinical Microbiology,
32:861866.
OMahony M et al. (1986). An outbreak of gastroenteritis on a passenger cruise ship. Journal of
Hygiene (London), 97:229236.
Peake DE, Gray CL, Ludwig MR, Hill CD (1999). Descriptive epidemiology of injury and illness
among cruise ship passengers. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 33:6772.
Rooney RM et al. (2004). A review of outbreaks of foodborne disease associated with passenger
ships: evidence for risk management. Public Health Reports, 119:427434.
Schlaich CC, Oldenburg M, Lamshoft MM (2009). Estimating the risk of communicable diseases
aboard cargo ships. Journal of Travel Medicine, 16:402406.
WHO (1988). International medical guide for ships, 2nd ed., including the ships medicine
chest. Geneva, WHO.
Widdowson MA et al. (2004). Outbreaks of acute gastroenteritis on cruise ships and on land:
identification of a predominant circulating strain of norovirusUnited States, 2002. Journal of
Infectious Diseases, 190:2736.
Wilson ME (1995). Travel and the emergence of infectious diseases. Emerging Infectious
Diseases, 1:3946.
67
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
5.1 Construction
5.1.1
5.1.2
5.1.3
o
5.2 Equipment
5.2.1
o
Potable water and hand- Install washbasin with hot and cold potable
washing facilities not available. water.
5.2.2
o
5.2.3
o
68
Supply adequate medications and/or equipment according to IMGS (3rd ed.) or flag-state
requirements and MFAG if dangerous goods
are on board.
5.3.1
o
Size, type and storage of medical chest inadequate to diagnose, treat and control public
health risks on board.
5.3.2
o
Evidence of medicines that Replace all medicines that have passed their
have passed expiry dates.
expiry dates with fresh medicines.
5.3.3
o
Medicines not stored according to manufacturers re- Store medicines according to manufactuquirements (e.g. vaccines not rers requirements.
stored in refrigerators).
5.3.4
o
Implement storage management of mediciMedicines not stored in an ornes; organize by medicine types, identificaganized manner.
tion codes, etc.
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
5.4.2
5.4.3
o
Toilet dirty or not flushing proClean toilets; repair toilet flushing system.
perly.
5.4.4
o
5.5.2
o
5.5.3
o
Medical log not available du- Provide updated medical log listing cases of
ring inspections. Entries not illness, passengers or crew concerned and
legible or up to date.
medications dispensed.
69
Recommended
5.6.3
No operations manuals available for the prevention, surveillance and control of public
health risks on board (applicable to passenger ships only).
Provide surveillance logs for diseases (e.g. gastrointestinal diseases) and operations manuals
for all medical procedures that are available on
board.
5.6.4
o
No evidence of adequate operations manuals for high-risk Provide written procedures and policies for
facilities and procedures (appli- operation of high-risk facilities, such as intensicable only if such facilities are ve-care units and haemodialysis facilities.
present).
5.7.1
o
No or inadequate communication infrastructure and procedures in place to contact teleme- Equip medical facilities with communication indical assistance service and to frastructure and procedures.
alert the competent onboard
authority on public health risks.
5.7.2
o
List of radio stations for telemedical assistance not available or Provide up-to-date list of radio stations.
up to date.
Required
Code of
Areas
70
Main risks
The main risks are:
microbiological (viruses, bacteria and protozoa);
non-microbiological (accidental drowning, slipping or tripping, entrapment, as well as
chemical, thermal and manual handling injuries).
Document review
Required documents are:
schematic plan for recreational water facilities, plant and systems;
written scheme for controlling the risk from exposure to disease-causing microorganisms;
pool installation, design and construction, maintenance and operation specifications;
training records for crew responsible for control methods;
monitoring records;
test results (e.g. pH, residual chlorine and bromine levels, temperature, microbiological
levels);
regular cleaning procedures;
emergency cleaning and disinfection procedures.
References
Guidelines and standards
WHO (2006). Guidelines for safe recreational water environments, volume 2swimming
pools and similar recreational-water environments. Geneva, WHO.
WHO (2007). Legionella and the prevention of legionellosis. Geneva, WHO.
Scientific literature
Beyrer K et al. (2007). Legionnaires disease outbreak associated with a cruise liner, August
2003: epidemiological and microbiological findings. Epidemiology and Infection, 135:802
810.
Chimonas MA et al. (2008). Passenger behaviors associated with norovirus infection on
board a cruise shipAlaska, May to June 2004. Journal of Travel Medicine, 15:177183.
Goutziana G et al. (2008). Legionella species colonization of water distribution systems,
pools and air conditioning systems in cruise ships and ferries. BMC Public Health, 8:390.
Jernigan DB et al. (1996). Outbreak of Legionnaires disease among cruise ship passengers
exposed to a contaminated whirlpool spa. Lancet, 347(9000):494499.
Kura F et al. (2006). Outbreak of Legionnaires disease on a cruise ship linked to spa-bath
filter stones contaminated with Legionella pneumophila serogroup 5. Epidemiology and
Infection, 134:385391.
Rowbotham TJ (1998). Legionellosis associated with ships: 1977 to 1997. Communicable
Disease and Public Health 1:146151.
72
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
6.1 Management
6.1.1
Materials or fittings support the Replace materials or fittings with corrosion-regrowth of microorganisms or sistant materials that do not support the growth
of microorganisms.
corrode easily.
6.2.2
o
6.3 Equipment
6.3.1
o
6.4.2
o
6.4.3
o
6.4.4
o
Train responsible crew members in knowledge of, and/or competency in, the operation
and maintenance of the pool systems. Assess
knowledge and/or competency following training.
73
6.4.5
o
74
6.4.6
o
6.4.7
o
6.4.8
o
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
6.4.9
o
6.4.10
o
Seawater flow-through pools Close seawater flow-through pools for use wheoperated in port without suita- never ship is in port or in other water bodies
ble water treatment.
that may harbour potential contamination.
6.4.11
o
6.4.12
o
6.4.13
o
6.4.14
o
6.4.15
o
Evidence of disease vectors Apply disease vector control measures and difound.
sinfect.
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
o
o
6.5.1
o
Produce and implement a procedure for emergency cleaning and disinfection. Train responsible employees in knowledge of emergency
cleaning and disinfection procedures. Assess
knowledge and/or competency following training.
75
In special areas
Disposal prohibited
Disposal prohibited
Disposal prohibited
Disposal prohibited
Disposal prohibited
Mixed refuse
Varies by componentb
Varies by componentb
Must pass through a screen with a mesh size no larger than 25 mm.
When substances with different disposal or discharge requirements are mixed, the more stringent disposal requirement applies.
76
Codex Alimentarius Commission (2003). CAC/RCP1-1969 (Rev.4-2003) Recommended international code of practicegeneral principles of food hygiene; incorporates hazard analysis and
critical control point (HACCP) system and guidelines for its application.
WHO (2004). Rolling revision of the Guidelines for drinking-water quality and Guide to ship
sanitation (Draft), 10/2004. Geneva, WHO.
WHO (1999). Safe management of wastes from health-care activities. Geneva, WHO.
IMO (2000). Guidelines for ensuring the adequacy of port waste reception facilities. London,
IMO.
IMO Resolution MEPC.70(38): Guidelines for the development of garbage management plans.
London, IMO.
IMO Resolution MEPC.76(40): Standard specification for shipboard incinerators. London, IMO.
IMO Convention on Facilitation of International Maritime Traffic 1965, as amended, 2006 edition. Annex 5: Certificates and documents required to be carried on board ships.
Main risks
Food wastes attract disease vectors, including rodents, flies and cockroaches. All waste can
contain physical, hazardous microbial or chemical agents; for example, sharp objects such as
needles may harbour infectious agents. Harmful chemicals can be deposited in waste and pose
a risk for waste-handling staff.
Humans can become exposed directly, both on board and at port, by contact with waste that is
not managed in a safe manner. Exposure can also occur through the environmental transfer of
disease-causing organisms or harmful substances that have not been disposed of safely. However, waste can be managed and disposed of in ways that prevent harm. Procedures to facilitate
the safe processing, storage and discharge of garbage should be implemented in a garbage
management plan.
Document review
Required documents:
a garbage management plan for every ship of 400 tons gross tonnage and above, and every
ship certified to carry 15 persons or more; this document should contain all information requested in the Marine Environment Protection Committee Guidelines for the development of
garbage management plans;
a garbage record book for every ship of 400 tons gross tonnage and above, and every ship
certified to carry 15 persons or more; this document should contain information on amounts
of different waste types produced on board, plus information including discharge and incineration processes;
International safety management manual;
maintenance instructions for waste processing units (e.g. incinerator);
construction plans of sewage system to check drains in waste areas.
References
International conventions
IMO, Maritime Labour Convention 2006.
Guidelines and standards
WHO (1999). Safe management of wastes from health-care activities. Geneva, WHO.
WHO (2011). Guide to ship sanitation. Geneva, WHO.
77
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
7.1.1
o
No garbage record book availa- All garbage record books must be available
ble, or garbage record book for a minimum of 2 years. Notify Port State
does not contain all disposal Control.
and incineration operations.
The date, time, position of ship, Garbage record books must be up to date. Prodescription of the garbage and vide missing information to Port State Control
estimated amount incinerated and competent authority.
or discharged are not logged
and/or signed.
7.2.1
o
No garbage management plan Implement all procedures for collecting, stoavailable, or not all procedures ring, processing and disposing of garbage in
for collecting, storing, proces- the plan.
sing and disposing of garbage
are covered in the plan.
Nominate a designated person to be in charge
of carrying out the garbage management plan.
Translate garbage management plan into the
working language of the crew.
o
o
7.3 Management
7.3.1
o
Train crew in procedures and regulations relating to garbage collecting, processing, sorting
and disposal.
7.4.1
o
78
Install waste container that is watertight, nonabsorbent and easily cleanable; can be disinfected; and has a tightly fitting cover.
7.4.2
o
7.4.3
o
7.4.4
o
7.4.5
o
Install a grease interceptor between galley wastewater drains and wastewater system.
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
o
o
7.5.1
o
o
o
79
7.5.2
o
7.5.3
o
7.5.4
o
o
o
Post waste separation and identification instructions at each waste collecting point.
Provide sharps containers that are made of metal or puncture-proof plastic, fitted with covers,
rigid, impermeable and tamper proof. ContaiSharps waste (e.g. needles, bla- ners need to be yellow, and labelled with the
des) not stored in appropriate word SHARPS and the international infeccontainers; waste other than tious substance (biohazard) symbol.
sharps found in the container; Provide appropriate container holders to avoid
container or containers are full. injuries if ship is rolling.
Dispose of all containers that are three-quarters
full into a labelled, yellow infectious medical
waste bag before removal from the dispensary.
7.5.5
o
80
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
7.5.6
o
7.5.7
o
7.5.8
o
Crew members handling potentially infectious health-care Vaccinate crew members in charge of handling
wastes not vaccinated against these waste types against hepatitis B.
hepatitis B.
7.5.9
o
Evidence of vectors and/or re- Disinfect, derat and apply insecticides immeservoirs found.
diately.
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
7.6.1
o
7.6.2
o
7.6.3
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
7.7 Transport
Clean and disinfect waste transport facilities.
7.7.1
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
81
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
7.8.1
o
7.8.2
o
7.8.3
o
82
No hand-washing facilities
available close to waste processing areas. Hand-washing facilities not adequately equipped.
7.8.4
o
7.8.5
o
7.8.6
o
7.8.7
o
7.8.8
o
Evidence of vectors and/or re- Disinfect, derat and apply insecticides immeservoirs found.
diately.
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
7.9 Storage
7.9.1
o
7.9.2
o
7.9.3
o
7.9.4
o
No hand-washing facilities
available close to waste holding
areas. Hand-washing facilities
not adequately equipped.
o
o
o
o
o
7.9.5
o
No locker for cleaning materials Provide storage locker with cleaning utensils
available; broken or dirty equi- away from food.
pment.
Provide proper cleaning equipment.
No adequate supply of cleaning equipment, PPE and waste
bags or containers located close to the storage area.
o
o
o
o
83
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
7.9.6
o
7.9.7
o
7.9.8
o
7.9.9
o
7.10.1
o
7.10 Incinerator
7.10.2
o
7.10.3
o
7.10.4
o
7.10.5
o
7.10.6
o
o
o
o
o
o
7.11 Discharge
7.11.1
o
7.11.2
o
84
Garbage has been disposed Inform competent authority (e.g. Port State
of overboard in a special Control).
area, or any other evidence of
prohibited waste deposit into Capture and retain waste on board.
water.
Display signage in English, French or SpaMaster or crew not familiar
nish, notifying passengers and crew of garwith procedures for manabage disposal requirements in accordance
ging garbage on board.
with MARPOL Annex V.
o
o
Main risks
The main risks include contamination by vectors and effects of the engine-room environment on
the occupational health of crew members, including:
external exposure to oil and inhalation of oil vapour and mist created by poorly ventilated and
located equipment;
high temperature of enclosed control rooms with insufficient cooling facilities;
insufficient lighting.
Document review
None applicable.
References
International conventions
IMO (1978). Guidelines for engine room layout, design and arrangement (MSC 68/Circ 834).
London, IMO. Chapter 6.3, Ergonomics; Chapter 6.4, Minimizing risk through layout and design.
IMO, International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships 1973, as modified by
the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto (MARPOL), Annex VI.
86
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
8.1 Construction
8.1.1
o
8.2 Management
Apply vector control measures and eliminate
vector reservoir.
8.2.1
o
8.2.2
o
Ducts extend from the weaVector-proof both ends of the service outlet of
ther deck directly to the encold-air or hot-air systems serving more than
gine room without protection
one compartment.
from vectors.
Hand-washing station not wi- Install a washbasin with hot and cold potable wathin easy access.
ter within easy access of machinery.
8.3.2
o
8.4 Ventilation
8.4.1
o
87
Definition of drinking-water
The terms drinking-water or potable water are used to define any water for human
consumption. This includes not only water for drinking or cooking, but also water for brushing
teeth, showers, washing hands, washing clothes and so on. Even on large, modern merchant
vessels, showers and washbasins that have so-called fresh water are actually drawing it
directly from desalination plants; therefore, it does not meet drinking-water quality criteria.
Untreated fresh water may also harbour many health risks for the consumer and public
health. Therefore, ships equipped with freshwater systems cannot use water that is unfit
for any human consumption.
Main risks
Improperly managed water on ships is an established route for infectious disease transmission.
Furthermore, water may be a source of index cases of disease, which might then be transmitted
88
via other routes. Most waterborne outbreaks involve ingestion of water that was contaminated
with pathogens derived from human or animal excreta. Contamination is associated with
spoiled bunkered water, cross-connections between potable and non-potable water, improper
loading procedures, poor design and construction of potable water storage tanks, and
inadequate disinfection. Space is often limited on board ships, and therefore potable
water systems are likely to be physically close to excessive heat, or close to hazardous
substances such as sewage or waste streams. Avoiding cross-contamination is one of the
major challenges of keeping water safe on ships.
Bunkering is a high-risk procedure. Unsafe handling and using inappropriate materials (e.g.
firefighting hoses) may lead to contamination. Hazardous water can be supplied from shore and,
if the ship has no barrier systems, the water may contaminate the ships potable water.
Contamination of the shore (supply) system is also possible if there are no backflow
preventers installed between the shore and the ship. It is crucial to know where risks exist,
and it is necessary to implement good handling practice concerning potable water hoses
and the whole bunkering procedure.
The GDWQ define the recommended minimum quality criteria of potable water. Some of
the most common criteria are listed below. The parameters in bold can be used as on-site
parameters to monitor a ships water safety.
Appearance and colour
The appearance and taste of drinking-water should be acceptable to the consumer. Water
should have no detectable odour. Ideally, drinking-water should have no visible colour.
pH
For effective disinfection with chlorine, the pH should be less than 8.0. The optimum pH
depends on the water and the materials used in the potable water distribution system, but it
is usually in the range 6.58.0 and can extend up to 9.5. The pH is important when checking
water treatment efficiency and corrosive potential of mains and pipes in the drinking-water
distribution system.
Temperature
Water temperature should always be either below 25 C or above 50 C. In temperatures of
2550 C, a high risk of bacterial growth (especially Legionella spp.) exists, and water safety
testing should be performed.
Conductivity
Electrical conductivity is not discussed in the GDWQ. It is an important operational parameter to assess the efficacy of the desalinated water remineralisation process. Typical values (in
S/cm) for desalinated water are very low. A contamination of distillate or seawater can be
easily detected because seawater has a high conductivity (e.g. 50 000 S/cm).
Chlorine
Free chlorine and total chlorine should be measured during or after the disinfection treatment,
or more often as required. Effective disinfection should have a free chlorine (Cl2) concentra89
tion of between 0.5 mg/l and 1.0 mg/l at the point of consumption. Different national standards in chlorination levels should be considered, because they can differ. For example, the
United States Vessel Sanitation Program states that the acceptable minimum level of free
chlorine at the distant point while water should be in consumption condition is 0.2 mg/l,
whereas in European the maximum allowed concentration is around 0.6 mg/l.
Lead
Lead concentration should not exceed 10 g/l. The use of lead pipes, fittings or solder can
result in elevated lead levels in drinking-water, which cause adverse neurological effects.
This is especially true in systems with aggressive or acidic waters. Wherever practicable,
lead pipework should be replaced.
Cadmium
Cadmium concentration should not exceed 3 g/l.
Iron
Iron levels should not exceed 200 g/l. At levels above 300 g/l, iron stains laundry and
plumbing fixtures. There is usually no noticeable taste at iron concentrations lower than 300
g/l, although turbidity and colour may develop.
Copper
Copper should not exceed a concentration of 2000 g/l. Copper can stain laundry at
concentrations above 1000 g/l and, at levels above 5000 g/l, copper can cause the water
to have an orange tinge and a bitter taste. Corrosion in the piping is a typical cause of copper contamination in water.
Nickel
Nickel contamination can happen when nickel is leached from new nickel/chromium-plated
taps. Low concentrations may also arise from stainless steel pipes and fittings. Nickel leaching drops off over time. Increasing the water pH to control corrosion of other materials
should help to reduce nickel leaching. Nickel concentrations should not exceed 20 g/l.
Zinc
The main corrosion problem with brasses is dezincification, which is the selective dissolution of zinc from duplex brass, leaving behind copper as a porous mass of low mechanical
strength. Zinc (as zinc sulfate) imparts an undesirable astringent taste to water at a concentration of about 4000 g/l. Water containing zinc at concentrations in excess of 30005000
g/l may appear opalescent and develop a greasy film when boiled. The GDWQ do not
define a health-based guideline value, but concentrations above 3000 g/l may not be
acceptable to consumers.
Hardness
Hardness, measured in concentration of calcium carbonate (CaCO3), should be between
100 mg/l (1 mmol/l) and 200 mg/l (2 mmol/l) to avoid corrosion and scaling, respectively.
Turbidity
Median turbidity should ideally be below 0.1 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU) for effective disinfection. Typical values for potable water are between 0.05 NTU and 0.5 NTU.
The appearance of water with a turbidity of less than 5 NTU is usually acceptable to all
90
consumers. High turbidity can cause material collected on the surfaces of pipes to slough
off within the water distribution system.
Microorganisms
Total coliforms
Coliforms are a broad class of bacteria, and include those that can survive and grow in
water. Hence, they are not useful as an index of specific faecal pathogens, but they can be
used as an indicator of treatment effectiveness, and to assess the cleanliness and integrity
of distribution systems, and the potential presence of biofilms. The guideline value is zero
(0) coliforms per 100 ml of water.
Escherichia coli
E. coli is a type of coliform, and is considered the most suitable index of faecal contamination monitoring, including surveillance of drinking-water quality. The guideline value is zero
(0) E. coli per 100 ml of water.
Intestinal enterococci
The intestinal enterococci group can be used as an index of faecal pollution. Most species
do not multiply in water environments. Important advantages of this group are that they
tend to survive longer in water environments than E. coli or thermotolerant coliforms, and
are more resistant to drying and chlorination. Guideline value is zero(0) per 100 ml of water.
Clostridium perfringens
Most of these bacteria are of faecal origin and produce spores that are exceptionally resistant to unfavourable conditions in water environments, including ultraviolet irradiation,
temperature and pH extremes, and disinfection processes, such as chlorination. Like E. coli,
C. perfringens does not multiply in most water environments and is a highly specific indicator of faecal pollution. C. perfringensshould not be present in drinking-water.
Heterotrophic plate count
Heterotrophic plate counts (HPCs) detect a wide spectrum of heterotrophic microorganisms, including bacteria and fungi. The test is based on the ability of the organisms to grow
on rich growth media, without inhibitory or selective agents, over a specified incubation
period and at defined temperatures (usually at 22 C and 36 C).
HPC is a useful parameter for the operational management of the ships potable water
system and water treatment efficacy. To properly compare HPC results, it is crucial to take
more than one sample in the system. At a minimum, one sample should be taken from the
tank (by use of an installed sampling tap) and another sample should be taken at the tap
farthest away from the tank (usually at the bridge deck). Comparison of both (or more) samples allows interpretation of biological processes inside the distribution system and gives
information about treatment efficacy. To be able to survey development of microbial growth
in the particular system, it is necessary to always take the samples from the same sampling
points. There are no guideline values, but the actual numbers from HPC are not as important as changes in numbers at particular locations. In distribution systems, increasing
numbers from HPC can indicate a deterioration in cleanliness, possible stagnation and the
potential development of biofilms.
91
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
P. aeruginosa is a common environmental organism and can be found in faeces, soil, water
and sewage. It can multiply in water environments and also on the surface of suitable organic materials that are in contact with water. P. aeruginosa is a recognized cause of hospitalacquired infections with potentially serious complications. It has been isolated from a range
of moist environments, such as sinks, water baths, hot-water systems, showers and spa pools. The main infection route is through susceptible tissuenotably wounds and mucous
membranesand contaminated water or surgical instruments. Therefore, at a minimum,
it should be analysed in water samples taken from sick bays or hospitals, where stagnant
water often poses an additional health risk.
Legionella
Legionella bacteria are the cause of legionellosis, including Legionnaires disease. The
bacteria are ubiquitous in the environment and can grow at temperatures found in piped
distribution systems. The route of infection is by inhalation of droplets or aerosols; however,
exposure from piped water systems is preventable through the implementation of basic
water quality management measures. This includes maintaining water temperature outside
the range at which Legionella proliferates (2550 C) and maintaining disinfectant residuals
throughout the piped distribution system. Whenever water temperatures are found in the
critical range of 2550 C, Legionella testing should be performed to assess the health risk
for consumers.
Sampling procedure
Water sampling is necessary whenever technical or operational problems may exist, or
when national law requires a water analysis.
The water sampling must be done by qualified personnel so that the sampling method
does not influence the test results (i.e. does not contaminate the sample). Special sampling
bottles and special procedures (as defined in ISO 19458) must be used.
Sample testing needs to be done using suitable methods by accredited laboratories. An
internationally accepted laboratory quality standard is defined in ISO 17025. This document
provides examples for parameters that are useful in certain circumstances.
An example for a reasonable microbiological sampling scheme is given below. It should be
considered that the quantity of samples depends on the size of the water installation.
Sample A: One sample should be taken from the potable water tank. This sample represents the water quality at the beginning of the ships potable water system. Sampling
should be performed as described in ISO 19458 (purpose a). Ship operators should be
advised to install water sampling taps at the tank so that samples can be taken properly.
Sample B: The next sample should be taken from the tap farthest from the potable water
tank. It represents the influence of the distribution system. Sampling should be performed
according to ISO 19458 (purpose b).
Sample C: If there is evidence of stagnation or other contamination in medical areas, an
additional sample should be taken according ISO 19458 (purpose c). This sample represents the water quality for the consumer because sampling taps are not disinfected before
sampling. It would be reasonable to test for P. aeruginosa at this sampling point.
Sample D: Whenever cold water temperature is above 25 C or hot water temperature is
below 50 C (or both), additional testing for Legionella is recommended. In this case, at
least one cold and one hot water sample should be taken. It can be useful to test more
sampling points (e.g. at the calorifier) to get even more information.
92
Document review
Constructional drawings of potable water system.
Drinking-water analysis reports.
Medical logbook or gastrointestinal record book (or both).
Water safety plan.
Maintenance instructions of treatment devices.
References
International conventions
ILO, Accommodation of Crews (Supplementary Provisions) Convention 1970 (no. 133).
Scientific literature
Castellani PM et al. (1999). Legionnaires disease on a cruise ship linked to the water supply
system: clinical and public health implications. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 28:3338.
Cayla JA et al. (2001). A small outbreak of Legionnaires disease in a cargo ship under repair.
European Respiratory Journal, 17:13221327.
Daniels NA et al. (2000). Travelers diarrhea at sea: three outbreaks of waterborne
enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli on cruise ships. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 181:1491
1495.
Goutziana G et al. (2008). Legionella species colonization of water distribution systems,
pools and air conditioning systems in cruise ships and ferries. BMC Public Health, 8:390.
Joseph CA, Yadav R, Ricketts KD (2009). Travel-associated Legionnaires disease in Europe
in 2007. Eurosurveillance, 14(18):pii:19196.
Merson MH et al. (1975). Shigellosis at sea: an outbreak aboard a passenger cruise ship.
American Journal of Epidemiology, 101:165175.
Mintz ED et al. (1998). An outbreak of Brainerd diarrhea among travelers to the Galapagos
Islands. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 177:10411045.
OMahony M et al. (1986). An outbreak of gastroenteritis on a passenger cruise ship. Journal
of Hygiene (London), 97:229236.
Regan CM et al. (2003). Outbreak of Legionnaires disease on a cruise ship: lessons for
international surveillance and control. Communicable Disease and Public Health, 6:152
156.
Rooney RM et al. (2004). A review of outbreaks of waterborne disease associated with ships:
evidence for risk management. Public Health Reports, 119:435442.
Guidelines and standards
Department of Health and Human Services (USA), Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health (2005). Vessel sanitation program
operations manual. Atlanta, GA, and Ft Lauderdale, FL, Department of Health and
Human Services (USA), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for
Environmental Health.
Department of Health and Human Services (USA), Public Health Service, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (2005). Vessel sanitation program construction guidelines. Atlanta,
GA, Department of Health and Human Services (USA), Public Health Service, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
ISO/IEC 17025:2005. General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration
laboratories. Geneva, ISO.
ISO 19458:2006. Water qualitysampling for microbiological analysis. Geneva, ISO.
93
94
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
9.1 Documents
9.1.1
o
Samples have to be taken to assess actual status of potable water.Refer to WHO Guide to
ship sanitation, Table 2.2,
Examples of parameters frequently tested in
potable water and typical values.
9.1.2
o
9.1.3
o
Implement a water safety plan, including all critical procedures influencing potable water quality (e.g. bunker procedure, ship water system).
9.2 Management
9.2.1
o
9.2.2
o
9.3.1
o
Materials and pressurized Use only materials that are resistant to 90C
components used not heat (taps to 70C) so that thermal disinfection can
be done.
resistant.
supply only.
9.3.2
o
Metals and plastics not certi- metals in contact with potable water should be
fied for use in potable water approved by the national authorities for this
systems and may harm water purpose.
quality.
95
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
9.4.1
o
Equip boat or barge with suitable, clean potable water hoses that are blue (in colour) and
labelled with the words Potable water. MaBoat not properly equipped
terials used need to meet the requirements of
with independent potable wanational health authorities.
ter tanks; suitable, clean water hoses and hose fittings; or Clean and disinfect existing potable water hopumps and independent pipe ses, fittings and equipment.
systems to provide potable wa- Store all required equipment in a closed, clean,
ter only to the ships. Poor sani- self-draining locker that is labelled with the
tary condition of water boat or words Potable water hose/equipment.
equipment.
Clean and disinfect the whole storage and distribution system that is used to provide potable
water to other ships.
o
o
9.4.2
o
9.4.3
o
9.4.4
o
9.4.5
o
9.5.1
o
96
No port water quality report Request port water quality report before bunavailable.
kering water.
9.5.3
o
No testing equipment available Equip ship with basic testing equipment (e.g.
on board.
turbidity, pH, disinfection residuals).
9.5.4
o
Stop bunkering immediately and discard bunShore supplier using inappro- kered water.
priate, broken or dirty materials
Use only own materials (e.g. hoses, fittings) that
(hoses, fittings, etc.).
are appropriate, clean and well maintained.
9.5.5
o
No backflow prevention to
avoid contamination of the
shore supply is installed in the Install backflow preventer on board to avoid
ship, or backflow prevention is any backflow from ship to the shore supply.
not adequately maintained or
inspected.
9.5.6
o
Secure flange with a sealed cap and a corrosion-proof key lock to prevent contamination
and unauthorized access.
o
o
o
9.5.7
o
9.5.8
o
Equip bunker station with suitable potable water hoses, clearly marked with the words Potable water. Normal firefighting hoses are not
Filling hoses not made of suita- appropriate.
ble materials, not labelled, used Use potable water hoses exclusively for this
for other purposes other than purpose.
potable water filling, dirty, not
capped, or in poor or unsanitary Provide suitable hoses, approved by the authocondition.
rized national administration, of at least 15 m
in length and equipped with unique fittings to
avoid connection to other hoses (connect to
the filling line according to ISO 5620).
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
o
o
97
9.5.9
o
Avoid dragging ends on the ground and dipping uncapped ends into harbour water. Train
staff in good hygiene practices.
9.5.10
o
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
During bunkering, hoses are Elevate the hoses so they are above ground.
placed directly on the ground Do not touch the harbour water with the hose
or through harbour water.
(to prevent cross-contamination).
9. 6 Water production
9.6.1
o
98
9.6.2
o
Take samples from the tank and, at the minimum, perform a microbiological analysis (e.g.
test for E. coli, coliforms, enterococci, C. perWater has been produced in fringens, HPC) to evaluate level of risk.
unsafe areas such as in ports,
Perform disinfection of piping and components
on rivers or on anchorage.
between evaporator and tank.
Inform responsible staff that water production
in unsafe areas is forbidden.
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
o
o
9.6.3
o
9.6.4
o
9.6.5
o
Information about evaporaObtain and post the most important instructor missing; no manufacturer
tions, including technical specifications, close
contact details or maintenance
to the evaporator.
instructions available.
9.6.6
o
9.6.7
o
9.6.8
o
o
o
o
9. 7 Treatment components
9.7.1
o
9.7.2
o
9.7.3
o
o
o
99
9.7.4
o
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
9. 8 Disinfection
9.8.1
o
9.8.2
o
9.8.3
o
9.8.4
o
Continuous halogenation performed, but no continuous recording of the halogen concentration installed.
o
o
9.8.5
o
9.8.6
o
9.8.7
o
9.8.8
o
Chlorine and pH testing kits not Equip ship with a testing kit for free and total
available.
chlorine (range 05 mg/l) and pH (range 610).
9.8.9
o
9.8.10
o
100
o
o
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
9. 9 Tanks
9.9.1
o
o
o
9.9.3
o
9.9.4
o
9.9.5
o
9.9.2
o
Remove any cross-connections between potable and non-potable water tanks and pipes.
101
9.9.6
o
9.9.7
o
9.9.8
o
9.9.9
o
o
o
Store potable water only in tanks constructed for this purpose, and protect against any
contamination from outside or within the tank
(e.g. corrosion, or inappropriate or faulty tank
coating).
9.9.10
o
102
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
Supply written documentation that tank coating is approved for potable water tanks and
that all manufacturers recommendations have
been followed, or take samples for chemical
analysis (or both).
9.9.11
o
Screen vents and overflow pipes with corrosionresistant mesh of mesh count 16 16 or finer.
Use vents or overflow that is at least the same diameter as the filling line.
Remove any direct connections between ducts
from potable water tanks and non-potable
liquid tanks.
9.9.12
o
9.9.13
o
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
o
o
Equip tanks with level indicators like watergauge glass, petcocks, enclosed float gauges
or water-operated pressure gauges.
9.9.14
o
9.9.15
o
9.9.16
o
103
9.10.2
o
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
9.11.1
o
9.11.2
o
9.11.3
o
Install a suitable sampling cock at the waterpressure tank to take water samples for
analysis.
9.12.1
o
9.12.2
o
9.12.4
o
104
o
o
9.12.5
o
9.12.6
o
Run the hot-water circulation pump permaHot-water circulation pumps nently to avoid stagnation and cooling down of
not permanently running or not the water in the piping.
approved for drinking-water
Use only pumps that are approved for drinkingsystems.
water.
Hot and cold water piping laid
side-by-side without thermal
insulation.
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
o
o
9.13 Plumbing
9.13.1
o
9.13.2
o
9.13.4
o
9.13.5
o
105
9.13.5
o
9.13.6
o
Backflow preventers not adequately maintained; no inspections or testings have been performed or documented.
9.13.7
o
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
Perform testing of installed backflow-prevention devices at least once per year. Record the
results so that the testing logs can be shown to
the ships inspector.
9.14.1
o
9.14.2
o
9.14.3
o
9.14.4
o
o
o
in poor condition.
9.14.6
o
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
Washbasin or other places wheDeliver potable water to all washbasins, bathre water for human consumptubs, showers and other places where water is
tion is offered does not have
used for human consumption.
potable water.
9.16.1
o
o
o
o
9.17.1
o
9.18.1
o
Water has been produced in Test for microorganism contamination (esunsafe water bodies (e.g. ri- pecially E. coli, coliforms, enterocci, HPC,
vers, lakes, anchorage).
C. perfringens).
9.19.2
o
Water has been bunkered Test for microorganism contamination (esfrom unsafe sources (e.g. pecially E. coli, coliforms, enterocci, HPC, C.
using dirty hoses).
perfringens, P. aeruginosa).
107
9.19.3
o
No halogen or chlorine residue Test for microorganism contamination (espemeasured when testing.
cially E. coli, coliforms, enterocci, HPC).
9.19.4
o
Potable water installation does Sample for microorganism and chemical contanot meet the international or mination based on risk stratification and nationational technical standards.
nal health regulations.
9.19.5
o
9.19.6
o
9.19.7
o
9.19.8
o
Coloured water.
108
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
Area 10 Sewage
Introduction
Large amounts of wastewater can accumulate on ships, depending on the number of people
on board, type of ship and duration of voyage. This wastewater can be separated into grey
water (wash water, shower, etc.) and black water. Sewage and black water are often used
interchangeably.
According to the internationally accepted definition in the IMO International Convention for
the Prevention of Pollution from Ships 1973 (modified by the protocol of 1978 relating thereto
[MARPOL 73/78]), sewage is defined as:
drainage and other wastes from any form of toilets, urinals and WC flushing system;
drainage from medical premises (e.g. dispensary, sickbay) via washbasins, wash tubs and
scuppers located in such premises;
drainage from spaces containing living animals (e.g. livestock carriers); or
other wastewaters (e.g. grey water from showers) when mixed with the drainages defined
above.
Sewage is one type of wastewater, and is a major actual or potential source of potable water
pollution with infectious agents. Pollution can also come from many chemical characteristics,
including high concentrations of ammonium, nitrate and phosphorus; high conductivity
(due to high dissolved solids); and high alkalinity, with pH typically ranging between 7 and 8.
Trihalomethanes are also likely to be present as a result of past disinfection.
Main risks
Unsafe management and disposal of sewage can readily lead to adverse health consequences.
Black water may harbour many different harmful substances, such as chemicals, pharmaceuticals
and biological agents. It is well known that pathogenic amoebae, bacteria, viruses, worms, fungi
and parasites survive in untreated black water. The main risk is disease spread by contaminated
and insufficiently treated sewage that has been discharged into the surrounding water. Crosscontamination of potable water, accidents (e.g. leakage or overflow) and acquired infections
during maintenance work are some of the additional health risks.
The most common method of treating sewage is to flush sewage from toilets through a piping
system into a holding tank where it is comminuted, decanted and broken down by naturally
occurring bacteria in an aerobic process. It is then disinfected before it is discharged into the
open sea. It is important to consider that an excessive use of cleaners and disinfectant in the
sewage system may destroy the natural bacteria in the treatment plant. The aerobic process
needs oxygen; therefore, aerators blow air into the biological compartment. Toxic gases can be
produced during this process.
voyages and of a size >400 gross tonnage, or certified to carry >15 persons, need to be equipped
with at least one of the following sewage systems:
sewage holding tank with sufficient capacity and visual level indicator;
sewage comminuting and disinfecting system, including storage tank;
sewage treatment plant that is approved according to MEPC.2(VI), Recommendation on
international effluent standards and guidelines for performance tests for sewage treatment
plants.
Passenger ships deal with large amounts of wastewater and are often operating in protected
areas. Therefore, onboard cruise ship treatment plants often use the principles of membrane
filtration or reverse osmosis (or both).
In MARPOL 73/78 Annex IV, different regulations concerning handling of sewage are defined.
IMOs MEPC has defined additional amendments with more detailed information:
MEPC.2(VI), Actual criteria for testing of sewage treatment plants;
MEPC.115(51), Revision of the regulations in MARPOL Annex IV;
MEPC.157(55), Standards for the rate of discharge of untreated sewage;
MEPC.159(55), Criteria for sewage treatment plants built after January 2010
Document review
Technical drawings of sewage system.
IMO International Sewage Pollution Prevention (ISPP) certificate.
International Safety Management (ISM) manual.
Sewage management plan (if available).
Maintenance instructions of sewage treatment plant (if installed).
References
International conventions
ILO, Maritime Labour Convention 2006.
IMO, International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships 1973. (modified by the
protocol of 1978 relating thereto [MARPOL 73/78]).
Scientific literature
Rooney RM et al. (2004). A review of outbreaks of foodborne disease associated with passenger
ships: evidence for risk management. Public Health Reports, 119:427434.
Guidelines and standards
ISO 14726-2:2008. Ships and marine technologyIdentification colours for the content of piping
systemsPart 2: Additional colours for different media and/or functions. Geneva, ISO, 2009.
WHO (2011). Guide to ship sanitation, 3rd ed. Geneva, WHO.
110
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
10.1.2
o
10.1.3
o
10.1.4
o
10.1.5
o
10.2.1
o
10.2.2
o
10.2.3
o
Install air gaps or mechanical backflow preventers at garbage grinders and food-waste
systems.
111
Recommended
Code of
Areas
Required
10.3.1
o
10.4 Sewage from public and common bathrooms, hand-wash stations and toilets
10.4.1
o
Insufficient deck drains connected Install sufficient deck drainage that is connecto the sewage system.
ted to the sewage system.
10.4.2
o
Sewage and bathwater are Clean and unclog the drains and pipes.
clogged, or there is visible or
Install piping of adequate size.
reported backflow.
10.4.3
o
10.4.4
o
10.5.1
o
o
o
o
o
10.7.1
o
Colour coding missing at the Suitable colour coding has to be painted onto
piping (e.g. in blackblueblack the piping at least every 5 m (e.g. blackblue
black according to ISO 14726:2008).
every 5 m).
10.7.2
o
Pipes not well maintained; they Clean and maintain the piping.
are clogged, of inadequate size Repair leakage immediately.
or leaking
Install piping of adequate size.
10.7.3
o
Cross-connections to other
systems containing liquid are Remove all cross-connections.
found, or sewage pipes are
leading through potable water Remove all piping in the tanks that do not
tanks or are connected to pota- contain potable water.
ble water piping.
o
o
112
o
o
o
o
o
10.7.4
o
Recommended
Required
Code of
Areas
10.8.1
o
10.8.2
10.8.4
o
o
Tank not secured against over- Install easily visible level indicator on the
outside of the tank.
flow or leakage by coaming.
10.8.3
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
113
Recommended
Required
Code of
Areas
10.9.1
o
10.9.2
o
10.9.3
o
10.9.4
o
Train technical staff in the operation and mainShip personnel have insufficient tenance of the sewage system.
knowledge about operation
and maintenance of the commi- Train staff in the operation and maintenance
nuting and disinfection plant.
of the sewage system according to the ISM
manual.
10.10.1
o
10.10.2
o
114
o
o
o
10.10.3
Do not discharge effluent closer than 12 nautical miles to the coastline until all problems
are fixed.
10.10.5
Recommended
Required
Code of
Areas
o
o
o
10.11 Discharge
10.11.1
o
10.11.2
o
10.11.3
o
10.11.4
o
115
10.11.5
10.11.6
Recommended
Required
Code of
Areas
Install suitable pipeline to allow sanitary discharge of sewage to port reception facilities.
10.12.1
o
10.12.2
o
o
o
o
10.13 Bilge
Discharge the bilge water to a port-reception
facility. Clean the bilge.
10.13.1
o
10.13.2
o
116
o
o
o
117
three times the volume of each ballast water tank must be pumped through to meet the described standard. Pumping through less than three times the volume may be accepted, provided
the ship can demonstrate that at least 95% volumetric exchange is met.
Regulation D-2, Ballast water performance standard:
Ships conducting ballast-water management shall discharge:
<10 viable organisms/m3 50 m in dimension;
<10 viable organisms/ml <50 m in dimension and 10 m in dimension.
Also, discharge of the indicator microbes shall not exceed the specified concentrations.
The indicator microbes, as a human health standard, include, but are not limited to:
toxicogenic Vibrio cholerae (O1 and O139) with <1 colony forming unit (cfu)/100 ml or <1 cfu/g
(wet weight) of zooplankton samples;
Escherichia coli <250 cfu/100 ml; and
intestinal enterococci <100 cfu/100 ml.
Ballast-water management systems must be approved by the administration and accord with
the IMO guidelines (Regulation D-3, Approval requirements for ballast water management systems). These include systems that make use of chemicals or biocides; make use of organisms or
biological mechanisms; or alter the chemical or physical characteristics of the ballast water.
IMO guidelines for uniform implementation of the ballast water management convention:
Guidelines for sediments reception facilities (G1)
Guidelines for ballast water sampling (G2)
Guidelines for ballast water management equivalent compliance (G3)
Guidelines for ballast water management and development of ballast water
management plans (G4)
Guidelines for ballast water reception facilities (G5)
Guidelines for ballast water exchange (G6)
Guidelines for risk assessment under Regulation A-4 (G7)
Guidelines for approval of ballast water management systems (G8)
Procedure for approval of BWM systems that make use of active substances (G9)
Guidelines for approval and oversight of prototype ballast water treatment technology programmes (G10)
Guidelines for ballast water exchange design and construction standards (G11)
Guidelines on design and construction to facilitate sediment control on ships (G12)
Guidelines for additional measures regarding ballast water management including emergency
situations (G13)
Guidelines on designation of areas for ballast water exchange (G14)
Main risks
The problem of invasive species is largely due to the expanded trade and traffic volume over the
past few decades. The effects in many areas of the world have been devastating. Quantitative
data show that the rate of bio-invasions is increasing at an alarming rate, sometimes exponentially, and new areas are being invaded all the time. Seaborne trade continues to increase, and
the problem may not yet have reached its peak.
Specific examples include the introduction of the European zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) into the Great Lakes between Canada and the United States, resulting in billions of dollars
being spent on pollution control and cleaning the underwater structures and water pipes; and
the introduction of the American comb jelly (Mnemiopsis leidyi) to the Black and Azov seas,
causing the near extinction of anchovy and sprat fisheries.
There are also public health risks; some cholera epidemics appear to be directly associated with
ballast water in South America, the Gulf of Mexico and other areas.
118
Sampling
The standards of the IMO Guidelines MEPC 58/23 Annex 3, Draft guidelines for ballast water
sampling (G2), can be used as a major reference for sampling ballast water, if necessary, for the
assessment of existing public health risks.
The objectives of these guidelines are to provide the States Parties authorities, including Port
State Control officers, with practical and technical guidance on ballast-water sampling and analysis for the purpose of determining whether the ship has complied with the ballast water management convention according to article 9, Inspection of ships, and with Regulations D-1 or
D-2.
For this purpose, samples should be taken from the discharge line, as near to the point of discharge as practicable, during ballast-water discharge, whenever possible. In cases where the
ballast system design does not enable sampling from the discharge line, other sampling arrangements may be necessary. Sampling via maintenance openings, sounding pipes or air pipes is
not the preferred approach for assessing compliance with Regulation D-2.
Any sampling protocol for compliance testing under the ballast water management
convention should observe the following principles to help ensure consistency of approach
between parties and to provide certainty to the shipping industry:
The sampling protocol should be in line with these guidelines.
The sampling protocol should result in samples that are representative of the whole discharge
of ballast water from any single tank or any combination of tanks being discharged.
The sampling protocol should consider the potential for a suspended sediment load in the
discharge to affect sample results.
The sampling protocol should provide for samples to be taken at appropriate discharge
points.
The quantity and quality of samples taken should be sufficient to demonstrate whether the
ballast water being discharged meets the relevant standard.
Sampling should be undertaken in a safe and practical manner.
Samples should be a manageable size.
Samples should be taken, sealed and stored to ensure that they can be used to test for compliance with the convention.
Samples should be fully analysed within the test methods holding-time limits by an accredited
laboratory.
Samples should be transported, handled and stored with consideration of the chain of custody.
Before testing for compliance with Regulation D-2, it is recommended that, as a first step, a
representative sample of ballast-water discharge be taken to establish whether a ship is potentially compliant or non-compliant. Such a test could help the State Party identify immediate
mitigation measures, within its existing powers, to avoid any additional impact from a possible
non-compliant ballast-water discharge from the ship.
In emergency or epidemic situations, port states may use alternative sampling methods that
may need to be introduced at short notice. Ships entering ports under their jurisdiction need to
be told about these sampling methods. In such situations, they may not necessarily notify WHO,
but such notification could be beneficial for other parties.
119
Document review
Constructional drawings of ballast-water reporting system.
IMOs ballast water reporting form.
International safety management manual.
Maintenance instructions for ballast-water treatment plant.
References
International conventions
IMO (2007), International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships Ballast
Water and Sediments.
Resolution MEPC. 152(55) Guidelines for sediments reception facilities (G1). London, IMO,
2005.
Resolution MEPC.123(53) Guidelines for ballast water management equivalent compliance
(G3). London, IMO, 2005.
Resolution MEPC.124(53) Guidelines for ballast water exchange (G6). London, IMO, 2005.
Resolution MEPC.127(53) Guidelines for ballast water management and development of
ballast water management plans (G4). London, IMO, 2005.
Resolution MEPC.140(54) Guidelines for approval and oversight of prototype ballast water
treatment technology programmes (G10). London, IMO, 2006.
Resolution MEPC.149(55) Guidelines for ballast water exchange design and construction
standards (G11). London, IMO, 2006.
Resolution MEPC.150(55) Guidelines on design and construction to facilitate sediment
control on ships (G12). London, IMO, 2006.
Resolution MEPC.151(55) Guidelines on designation of areas for ballast water exchange
(G14). London, IMO, 2006.
Resolution MEPC.153(55) Guidelines for ballast water reception facilities (G5). London,
IMO, 2006.
Resolution MEPC.161(56) Guidelines for additional measures regarding ballast water
management including emergency situations (G13). London, IMO, 2007.
Resolution MEPC.162(56) Guidelines for risk assessment under Regulation A-4 of the BWM
Convention (G7). London, IMO, 2007.
Resolution MEPC.169(57) Procedure for approval of ballast water management systems that
make use of active substances. London, IMO, 2008.
Resolution MEPC.173(58) Guidelines for ballast water sampling (G2). London, IMO, 2008.
Resolution MEPC.174(58) Guidelines for approval of ballast water management systems
(G8). London, IMO, 2008.
Resolution MEPC.175(58) Information reporting on type approved ballast water management
systems. London, IMO, 2008.
Resolution MEPC.188(60) Installation of ballast water management systems on new ships
in accordance with the application dates contained in the Ballast Water Management
Convention (BWM Convention). London, IMO, 2010.
Scientific literature
McCarthy SA, Khambaty FM (1994). International dissemination of epidemic Vibrio cholerae
by cargo ship ballast and other non-potable waters. Applications in Environmental
Microbiology, 60:25972601.
120
Recommended
Required
Code of
Areas
11.1 Management
11.1.1
o
IMO ballast-water
book not available.
record
11.1.2
o
Ballast-water
management lines.
plan (BWMP) not available.
Implement all procedures as defined in the
o
o
BWMP.
11.1.3
o
11.2.1
o
11.2.2
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
11.3 Discharge
11.3.1
o
Untreated or unexchanged
Stop discharge operation immediately and
ballast water has been or is disnotify proper authority (e.g. the harbour police
charged into the port basin, the
or Port State Control).
river or another protected area.
121
IMO SOLAS XII/6.5.1Protection of cargo holds from loading/discharge equipment and SOLAS XII/6.5.3Failure of cargo hold structural
members and panels
Main risks
Main public health risks on board include the design, construction, management and operation of the cargo holds. Some public health risks can be
carried from one country to another via contaminated or infested cargo loaded into holds, onboard contamination or vector infestation of cargo, and
inadequate or insufficient onboard preventive and control measures.
Document review
Management plans.
Operational procedures.
Confined-space entry procedures and records.
Lock-out and tag-out procedures.
Material Safety Data Sheets.
Construction drawings (including drainage).
Ventilation system drawings.
Vector control records.
Cleaning schedule.
References
International conventions
IMO, International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), Regulation XII/6.5.1. London, IMO, 1974.
IMO, I267:2008 Manual on loading and unloading of solid bulk cargoes for
terminal representatives. London, IMO, 2008.
IMO, Recommendations for entering enclosed spaces aboard ships. London, IMO, 1997.
123
Recommended
Required
Code of
Areas
12.2.2
o
o
o
o
12.3.2
o
o
o
o
12.5.1
o
Drains not independent of each Correct deficiencies and ensure that drains are
other and of all other drainage independent of each other and of all other draisystems.
nage systems.
12.5.2
o
12.5.3
o
Drain lines do not discharge to Drain lines to discharge to open drain wells
open drain wells.
with an air gap.
12.5 Drainage
12.6 Ventilation
12.6.1
o
Install separate ducts for ventilation, air-condiService outlet of the cold-air or tioning and heating systems.
hot-air system (or both) serves
Separate the service outlets for each compartmore than one compartment.
ment.
12.6.2
o
124
o
o
Main risks
Many diseases are transmitted to humans via vectors such as rats, mosquitoes, mice,
cockroaches, flies, lice and rat fleas. If not properly controlled, these vectors could board ships,
and then breed and be carried overseas. This would represent serious health risks to the crew
and passengers. Moreover, persons and vectors on board can, in turn, spread disease to ports
in other countries.
For example, standing water on board the ship or on its lifeboats provide a habitat for
mosquitoes to lay eggs. Adult mosquitoes will emerge from the standing water, and these adults
will lay additional eggs during their life-cycle. If standing water persists for long periods, or is
replenished by repeated heavy rain or overflow, increased mosquito production may continue
for several weeks or months. If not effectively controlled, mosquitoes could be carried by ship
and spread infectious disease via international travel.
Other risks include exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials through
contaminated objects that were improperly handled during housekeeping; for instance,
the housekeeping staff contact contaminated laundry because they were not wearing
appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). Finally, the presence of hazardous
chemicals used in the laundry process, dust from clothes and powder detergents, and poor
ventilation of the workplace all present health risks.
Document review
Integrated vector management plan.
References
International conventions
ILO, Maritime Labour Convention 2006.
Scientific literature
Anselmo M et al. (1996). Port malaria caused by Plasmodium falciparum: a case report. Le
Infezioni in Medicina, 4:4547.
Delmont J et al. (1994). Harbour-acquired Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Lancet, 344:330331.
126
Delmont J et al. (1995). Apropos of 2 cases of severe malaria contracted in the port of
Marseille. Bulletin de la Societe de Pathologie Exotique, 88:170173.
Draganescu N et al. (1977). Epidemic outbreak caused by West Nile virus in the crew of
a Romanian cargo ship passing the Suez Canal and the Red Sea on route to Yokohama.
Virologie, 28:259262.
Fijan S, Sostar-Turk S, Cencic A (2005). Implementing hygiene monitoring systems in hospital
laundries in order to reduce microbial contamination of hospital textiles. Journal of Hospital
Infection, 61(1):3038.
Peleman R et al. (2000). Indigenous malaria in a suburb of Ghent, Belgium. Journal of Travel
Medicine, 7:4849.
Raju N, Poljak I, Troselj-Vukic B (2000). Malaria, a travel health problem in the maritime
community. Journal of Travel Medicine, 7:309313.
Rubin L, Nunberg D, Rishpon S (2005). Malaria in a seaport worker in Haifa. Journal of Travel
Medicine, 12:350352.
Schultz MG et al. (1967). An outbreak of malaria on shipboard. American Journal of Tropical
Medicine and Hygiene, 16:576579.
Shoda M et al. (2001). Malaria infections in crews of Japanese ships. International Maritime
Health, 52:918.
127
Recommended
Required
Code of
Areas
13.1.1
o
No rat-proof guard.
13.1.2
o
13.1.3
o
o
o
o
o
13.2.1
o
13.2.2
o
13.3.1
o
Construction materials and de- Redesign and reconstruct materials so that they
sign make cleaning difficult.
facilitate cleaning and decontamination.
13.3.2
o
Ensure soil and waste drainage system is of adeImproper installation of soil and
quate dimensions, and constructed to minimize
waste drainage systems.
the risk of obstruction and facilitate cleaning.
13.3.3
o
13.3.4
o
13.4.1
o
Evidence of housekeeping crew Ensure that the housekeeping crew members take
members cleaning cabins of ill precautions, including using disposable PPE that is
passengers or crew while not changed after cleaning each ill persons cabin.
wearing PPE.
13.4.2
o
13.4.3
o
13.4.4
o
Evidence of housekeeping
crew members using the same
wiping cloth to clean cabins of
ill passengers or crew, as well
as cabins of well passengers or
crew; or to first clean cabins of
ill passengers and crew.
128
o
o
Annex 3
129
130
Evidence found
Sample
results
Documents reviewed
Indicate when the areas listed are not applicable by marking N/A.
Medicines
Operation
Equipment and
medical devices
Medical facilities
Operation
Equipment
Swimming pools/spas
Disposal
Treatment
Holding
Waste
Distribution
Storage
Source
Water
Service
Preparation
Storage
Source
Food
Areas/facilities/systems
inspected
Control measures
applied
Attachment to model Ship Sanitation Control Exemption Certificate/Ship Sanitation Control Certificate
SCENARIO 1
SCENARIO 2
SCENARIO 3
Re-inspection or
unannounced
inspection
Signs or symptoms
of a possible public
health risk reported
131
SCENARIO 1:
Competent authority
is able to perform
an inspection?
No
Yes
Issue Extension
to existing SSC
for max. 30 days by
using extension-stamp
on existing SSC
if applicable
Evidences for
public health risks found
on board?
No
Issue SSCEC
Yes
Clinical
signs or symptoms
for a public health risk or
no valid certificate?
Yes
Go to Scenario 3
No
Control
measures can be
successfully accomplished
in the port?
Yes
Issue SSCC
and attach notes about
measures and results
No
132
SCENARIO 2:
Re-inspection or unannounced
inspection
Is ship holding
extension
ssc requesting a new
certificate?
Yes
Go to Scenario 1
No
Noted or new
evidences for public health
risks existing?
No
Yes
Clinical
signs or symptoms for
a public health risk
Yes
Go to Scenario 3
No
Control
measures can be
accomplished?
Yes
No
133
SCENARIO 3:
No
Yes
Competent authority
shall consider ship as
affected conveyance
Conduct risk
assessment whether it
should be reported to IHR
National Focal
Point?
Yes
No
No
Disinfect, decontaminate,
disinsect or derat if
appropriate and secure an
adequate level of control of
the public health risk.
Authority
is able to carry out control
measures and obtain
good results?
Yes
Re-inspection and
control measures
at the next port
Table A3.1
Proposed sequence of inspection areas
Region
Inside
accommodation
Inside
engine room
Outside
Area
Rationale
Quarters
Pantry
Stores
Child-care facilities
Medical facilities
Engine room
Overview
Potable water
Sewage
Ballast tanks
Cargo holds
Outside
Standing water
On deck
135
Table A4.1
Personal protective equipment available to crew and inspectors
Personal protective
equipment item
Safety helmet
Hair net
Ear protection
Face mask
X
Kitchen apron
Watertight apron
Disposable overalls
X
X
136
X (FFP3 standard)
Inspector in case of
outbreak investigation
Table A5.1
Technical equipment useful for ship inspectors
Technical equipment
Flashlight (ideally
explosion proof)
Inspector during
Inspector
normal inspection in case of
outbreak
investigation
X
Function
Calibrated food-probe
thermometer (contact or
infrared)
White cloth
To authenticate certificates.
To facilitate paperwork.
Dictionary
To facilitate communication
between ship operator and
inspector.
Screwdriver kit
First-aid kit
Foldable ruler or
measuring tape
137
Technical equipment
Inspector during
Inspector
normal inspection in case of
outbreak
investigation
Function
Protein-detecting swab
To check appropriate
cleaning of surfaces (e.g. in
galley).
To collect samples of
different possible sources of
contamination (e.g. water,
food, human, surfaces, equipment).
To capture evidence.
Due to safety reasons and to facilitate entering onto the ship, the equipment on this list should be
stored in a backpack or other suitable portable container(s).
138
Table A6.1
List of model certificates and documents required for ship sanitation
inspections
Category
A
IHR-related
documents
B
Other documents,
as listed on the
IMO Convention
on Facilitation of
International Maritime Traffic 1965
(as amended,
2006 edition), might be requested
for assessment of
public health risks
Name
Note
Maritime Declaration of
Health
IHR Annex 8
IHR Annex 3
IHR Annex 6
General declaration
http://www.imo.org/Facilitation/mainframe.asp?topic_id=396
Cargo declaration
http://www.imo.org/Facilitation/mainframe.asp?topic_id=396
http://www.imo.org/Facilitation/mainframe.asp?topic_id=396
Crew list
http://www.imo.org/Facilitation/mainframe.asp?topic_id=396
Passenger list
http://www.imo.org/Facilitation/mainframe.asp?topic_id=396
Every ship that is 400 gross tonnage and every ship that is
certified to carry >15 persons shall carry a garbage management plan, which the crew must follow: http://www.imo.org/
Facilitation/mainframe.asp?topic_id=396
http://www.imo.org/Facilitation/mainframe.asp?topic_id=396
Document required
In the absence of such a document, the postal objects (numunder the Universal Postal ber and weight) must be shown on the cargo declaration
Convention (for mail)
Others
C
Other
management
plans concerning
onboard hygiene
139
Category
Name
Note
C
Management plan for
Other
vector control
management
Medical log
plans concerning
onboard hygiene
IMO ballast water
reporting form
Ballast Water Management Certificate
Ballast-water record
book
Other
140
http://www.imo.org/about/conventions/listofconventions/
pages/international-convention-for-the-control-and-management-of-ships'-ballast-water-and-sediments-(bwm).aspx
http://www.imo.org/about/conventions/listofconventions/
pages/international-convention-for-the-control-and-management-of-ships'-ballast-water-and-sediments-(bwm).aspx
Table A7.1
Sample Evidence Report Form
Evidence Report Form
This form supports the ship sanitation certificate (SSC), and provides a list of evidence found and control measures to be performed.
When attached to the SSC, each page of this attachment needs to be signed, stamped and dated by the competent authority. If this
document is used as an attachment to a pre-existing SSC, this attachment must be noted in the SSC (e.g. by using a stamp).
Ships name and IMO no. or registration:
o Stores
o Child-care facilities
o Swimming pools/spas
o Engine room
o Potable water
o Sewage
o Ballast water
o Cargo holds
o yes
o No
Evidence found
(brief description according to
WHO checklist; draw a line under
each item of evidence to ensure
items are clearly separated)
Measure to be applied
Required
Evidence code
Recommended
Page...........................................
of...........................................
IMO, International Maritime Organization; SSC, ship sanitation certificate; WHO, World Health Organization.
141
This column is reserved for the re-inspecting authority. Only successfully performed
measures should be stamped and signed
by the re-inspecting issuing authority. If no
stamp or signature is applied, the success
of the measure should be verified in a new
inspection. To differentiate between each
piece of evidence and the corresponding
measures, horizontal lines should be drawn
to separate different evidence.
At the bottom of each page of the form, the name and signature of the inspecting officer, the
stamp of the issuing authority, the page number and any comments should be noted.
142
143
ISO (International Organization of Standardization) (2002). ISO 15748-1:2002 Ships and marine
technologypotable water supply on ships and marine structures. Geneva, ISO.
ISO (International Organization of Standardization) (2006). ISO 19458:2006 Water quality
sampling for microbiological analysis. Geneva, ISO.
ISO (International Organization of Standardization) (2008). ISO 14726:2008 Ships and marine
technologyidentification colours for the content of piping systems. Geneva, ISO.
ISO (International Organization of Standardization), IEC (International Electrotechnical
Commission) (2005). ISO/IEC 17025:2005 General requirements for the competence of testing
and calibration laboratories. Geneva, ISO/IEC.
WHO (World Health Organization) (1999). Safe management of wastes from health-care
activities. Geneva, WHO.
WHO (World Health Organization) (2007). International medical guide for ships, 3rd ed. Geneva,
WHO.
WHO (World Health Organization) (2008). Guidelines for drinking-water quality. Geneva, WHO.
WHO (World Health Organization) (2011). Guide to ship sanitation, 3rd ed. Geneva, WHO.
144