60 To 1 Rules
60 To 1 Rules
60 To 1 Rules
1. It allows the pilot to compute the pitch attitude when ESTABLISHING an attitude during the CONTROL
AND PERFORMANCE procedure.
2. It reduces the pilot's workload and increases efficiency by requiring fewer changes and less guess
work.
3. It gives an alternative to the "TLAR" (that looks about right) method of instrument flying.
4. You can teach the "60-to-1 RULE" as opposed to trying to teach experience, as in the "TLAR" method.
1° = 1 NM at 60 NM
or
1° = 100 Ft at 1 NM
We know that the circumference of a circle is 2π r, therefore the mathematical data supporting this:
Circumference = 2 x 3.1416 x 60
= 376.99 NM
Since there are 360° in a circle, we can determine the length of a 1° arc:
376.99 NM / 360° = 1.05 NM per Degree or, approximately 1 NM per degree at 60 NM
This relationship is true not only in the horizontal plane, but also in the vertical plane. If this 1° = 6000 Ft at
60 NM relationship is drawn in the form of a vertically inclined plane and the height of the plane is measured
at different points, you can see that there is a definite relationship between the height of the 1° plane and the
distance from the apex of the 1° angle. The height of the plane at 1 NM is 100 Ft, therefore,
This relationship is constant. If the distance (NM) or the angle is changed, the altitude (Ft) is changed by the
same factor.
That is,
1° = 100 Ft at 1 NM
or
1° = 100 Ft/NM
At 1 NM, 3° = 300 Ft
In this relationship, 1° = 100 Ft/NM, if the distance is changed, multiply the altitude by the same factor. If the
angle is changed,
multiply the altitude by the same factor. If both the distance and the angle are changed, multiply the altitude
by both factors.
Notice that in the discussion of the mathematical data, there has been no mention of aircraft type or speed.
Speed has no effect on the 1° = 100 Ft/NM relationship! Look at the following Example.
An O-1 at 60 KTAS and an F-15 at 180 KTAS over a 10 NM distance on a 300 Ft/NM descent gradient (3° pitch
change from level flight
Both aircraft fly the same descent gradient since their pitch changes are the same. Speed has no effect!
Before we discuss how a rate of descent, Ft/Min, can be derived from a pitch change or descent gradient,
aircraft speed must be expressed in Nautical Miles per Minute (NM/Min)
This relationship is true when 600 NM/Hr is the speed of sound. Since it's always close, MACH can be used to
approximate NM/Min.
NM/Min can be determined from IAS by converting IAS to TAS. There are two methods available:
What will each aircraft's VVI be indicating during the 3000 Ft descent?
By restating some previous facts, a relationship between Pitch, Gradient and VVI is clear.
(1) The O-1 is traveling at 1 NM/Min and its VVI is indicating 300 Ft/Min for a 300 Ft/NM gradient or 3° pitch
change.
(Remember 1° = 100 Ft/NM)
(2) The F-15 is traveling at 3NM/Min and its VVI is indicating 900 Ft/Min for a 300 Ft/NM gradient or 3° pitch
change.
NM/Min = .8 x 10 = 8 NM/Min
VVI = 8 NM/Min x 600 Ft/NM
VVI = 4800 Ft/Min
Practical applications of the "60-to-1 RULE.
1. You're climbing at 285 KIAS (.6 MACH) and 3000 Ft/Min. What pitch change do you make to level off?
2. ARTCC tells you to climb to FL 250 and be at FL 250 in 10 NM. You're currently at FL 200 and are
indicating .6 MACH. What minimum pitch change is necessary, what should your VVI indicate, and can you
make it?
Whether you make it or not depends upon your aircraft's performance capability, but at least you know what
you need to establish to make it.
3. You're at FL 330 proceeding direct to the BFD TACAN. ARTCC clears you to descend to 3000 Ft and cross
the TACAN at 3000 Ft. You are now 50 DME from the TACAN, what do you do? Lower your pitch 6° and verify
this by checking that your VVI reads 600 Ft/NM x NM/Min.
During the descent, you slow to .5 MACH. What should your VVI read if you are still maintaining the 600 Ft/NM
descent gradient?
600 Ft/NM x 5 NM/Min = 3000 Ft/Min
So far, all of our calculations have been "no wind." How does wind affect the relationship between pitch, VVI
and the descent gradient?
Let's add a 60 kt tailwind to the last problem. You still need to descend at 600 Ft/NM (fly a 600 Ft/NM descent
gradient), but you must figure your VVI using NM/Min in groundspeed.
To find the pitch change necessary to get this VVI, the "in the air" NM/Min formula must be used.
This 1° pitch correction for the 60 kt wind is a good figure to remember. It is not an exact relationship, but it is
within ½° in most cases.
For example, if you have a 120 kt tailwind, you must increase your pitch change by about 2° to realize the
computed gradient. If you have a 60 kt headwind, you can decrease your pitch change by about 1° to fly the
computed gradient.
Horizontal Plane
First determine the turn radius of the aircraft. Now convert that turn radius to a number of degrees. For a 90°
turn, as in turning from an arc to a radial, the formula is simple:
For example, how many degrees lead should an aircraft use to turn onto a radial from the 15 DME arc at 180
KTAS?
On close-in arcs, constant bank angle may be necessary to stay on the arc. There are two methods to compute
the required bank angle.
Example: If the required lead point for an arc to radial intercept is 16°, then 8° of bank is required to maintain
the arc.
Teardrop penetrations.
The only guidance usually available to fly this type of approach is just a recommended turn altitude and a
"remain within" distance. It would be helpful to be able to compute a distance to go outbound so that a 30°
bank turn will leave you on course inbound or, if a turn point is depicted or you choose to go further outbound
to lessen the descent gradient, what bank angle is needed to roll out on course inbound. Examples 1 and 2
illustrate these two problems.
TR x 60
distance between radials
This is the same formula as above but "distance outbound" and "degrees between radials" have been
switched. Leg length (distance outbound) is the known value and you have to solve for offset (degrees
between radials).
VDP calculations
On non-USAF designed approach plates a VDP is not always published. Compute it for your desired glide slope,
usually 3° (300 Ft/NM) or 2½° (250 Ft/NM).
Steps to Determine Required Pitch and VVI (Winded Application). Mathematical steps:
For Turns Less or More Than 90°, Use The Following: (These cover most situations):
Degrees to Turn Fraction of 90° Turn Degrees to Turn Fraction of 90° Turn
180° 2 90° 1
150° 1 5/6 60° 1/2
135° 1 2/3 45° 1/3
120° 1 1/2 30° 1/6
Bank Angle Required to Maintain an Arc:
Required bank angle = 30 X TR (Use IMN squared for TR to obtain best results)
Arc
or Required Bank angle = Radial Lead Point / 2
HOLDING
Teardrop Holding Calculations:
Offset in degrees = TD X 60 or TR X 120
outbound distance outbound distance
Timing:
< 14,000 = 1+00 > 14,000 = 1+30
Determine bank angle required for teardrop penetration ( When 30° bank will not work):
Bank Angle = TR X 60 .
Distance Between Radials in NM
(3 X TR) + 2 3 X TR
Remain within distance Remain within distance
VDP Calculation:
VDP ( in NM ) From the end of the runway = HAT .
Gradient ( normally 300 )
VDP ( in timing) From the FAF = ( FAF to End of runway Distance ) - HAT
. = FAF to VDP Dist (NM) Gradient
( normally 300 )
2 X TR
EX. 2 X TR
150 TAS
10 KTS Tailwind 14 Seconds 2
Mile
RWY
(12000 ft)
45° off HDG
2 X TR (Kill
Drift)
NOTE: If 2 X TR = 2 MI
than displace down
a 2 MI RWY as
depicted
30° off HDG
(Kill Drift)
10% TAS X 4