Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2K views

    Case Study Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    Nikhil Monga
    This rubric evaluates group case study presentations on three parameters: content, presentation, and response to questions. For content, groups will be evaluated on their identification and analysis of key issues, proposed solutions, and links to course readings. Presentation factors include the flow of ideas, use of visuals, engagement of classmates, and use of staging effects. Response to questions examines how well groups field questions from classmates and support responses with theory. Groups receive a total mark for content while individual marks are given for presentation and response to questions. The best groups will provide thorough, well-researched analysis and creative, engaging presentations that stimulate discussion and demonstrate understanding of course concepts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Case Study Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    Nikhil Monga
    2K views3 pages
    This rubric evaluates group case study presentations on three parameters: content, presentation, and response to questions. For content, groups will be evaluated on their identification and analysis of key issues, proposed solutions, and links to course readings. Presentation factors include the flow of ideas, use of visuals, engagement of classmates, and use of staging effects. Response to questions examines how well groups field questions from classmates and support responses with theory. Groups receive a total mark for content while individual marks are given for presentation and response to questions. The best groups will provide thorough, well-researched analysis and creative, engaging presentations that stimulate discussion and demonstrate understanding of course concepts.

    Original Description:

    CASE STUDY

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This rubric evaluates group case study presentations on three parameters: content, presentation, and response to questions. For content, groups will be evaluated on their identification and analysis of key issues, proposed solutions, and links to course readings. Presentation factors include the flow of ideas, use of visuals, engagement of classmates, and use of staging effects. Response to questions examines how well groups field questions from classmates and support responses with theory. Groups receive a total mark for content while individual marks are given for presentation and response to questions. The best groups will provide thorough, well-researched analysis and creative, engaging presentations that stimulate discussion and demonstrate understanding of course concepts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    2K views3 pages

    Case Study Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    Nikhil Monga
    This rubric evaluates group case study presentations on three parameters: content, presentation, and response to questions. For content, groups will be evaluated on their identification and analysis of key issues, proposed solutions, and links to course readings. Presentation factors include the flow of ideas, use of visuals, engagement of classmates, and use of staging effects. Response to questions examines how well groups field questions from classmates and support responses with theory. Groups receive a total mark for content while individual marks are given for presentation and response to questions. The best groups will provide thorough, well-researched analysis and creative, engaging presentations that stimulate discussion and demonstrate understanding of course concepts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 3

    Evaluation Rubric: GROUP CASE STUDY

    Parameters

    Marks

    1. CONTENT
    Excellent (80%-100%)
    Good (60% to
    80%)

    Identification of the
    Main
    Issues/Problems

    Identifies & understands


    all of the main issues in the
    case study

    Analysis of the
    Issues

    Insightful and thorough


    analysis of all the issues

    Comments on
    effective
    solutions/strategies
    (The solution may
    be in the case
    already or proposed
    by you)

    15

    Well documented,
    Reasoned and pedagogically
    appropriate comments on
    solutions, or proposals
    for solutions, to all
    issues in the case study

    Links to Course
    Readings and
    Additional Research

    Page 1 of 3

    Excellent research into


    the issues with clearly
    documented links to
    class(and/or outside)
    readings

    Fair (40% to
    60%)

    Poor (0 to 40%)

    Identifies and
    Identifies and
    Identifies and
    Understands some
    understands few of the
    Understands most
    of the issues in the
    issues in case study
    of the main issues
    case study
    in the case study
    Thorough analysis Superficial analysis
    Incomplete analysis of
    of most of the issues
    of
    the issues
    some of the
    issues in the
    Appropriate, well
    Superficial
    and/or
    Little or no action
    inappropriate
    Thought out
    suggested, and/or
    solutions to some inappropriate solutions to all
    comments about
    of the issues
    solutions, or
    of the issues in the case
    in the case study
    proposals for
    study
    solutions, to most
    of the issues in the
    case study

    Good research and


    Documented
    links to the
    material read

    Limited research
    and
    Documented
    links to any
    readings

    Incomplete research and


    Links to any readings

    Delivery and
    Enthusiasm

    2. PRESENTATION
    Excellent
    Good
    Fair
    Poor
    Very clear and concise
    Clear flow of ideas Most ideas flow but Hard to follow the flow
    Flow of ideas.
    focus is lost at times Of ideas. Lack of enthusiasm
    Demonstrates passionate
    Limited evidence
    and interest.
    interest in the topic and
    Demonstrates
    of interest in and
    engagement with the class. interest in topic
    engagement with
    and engagement
    the topic
    with the class.

    Visuals

    Visuals augmented and


    extended
    comprehension of the
    issue sin unique ways

    Use of visuals
    related to the
    material

    Limited use of
    visuals loosely
    related to the
    material

    No use of visuals.

    Staging

    Uses stage effects ,such as


    props, costumes,
    sound effects, in a
    unique and dramatic
    manner that enhances
    the understanding of the
    issues in the case study

    Uses stage effects,


    such as props,
    costumes,
    sound effects,
    in an effective
    manner to
    extend
    understanding of
    the issues in
    the case study

    Limited use of
    No use of stage effects
    stage effects,
    and/or used in a
    manner that
    did not
    enhance the
    understanding of the
    Issues in the case
    study.

    Involvem
    ent of the
    class:
    -Questions
    -Generating
    discussion
    -Activities

    Excellent and salient


    discussion points that
    elucidated material to
    develop deep
    understanding

    Questions and
    discussion
    addressed
    important
    information that
    developed
    understanding

    Questions and
    discussion
    addressed
    surface features
    of the topic

    Response to
    Class
    Queries

    Appropriate and
    imaginative activities
    used to extend
    understanding in a
    creative manner

    Excellent response to
    student comments and
    discussion with
    appropriate content
    supported by
    theory/research

    Appropriate
    activities used
    to clarify
    understanding

    Good response to
    class
    questions and
    discussion with
    some
    connection
    made to
    theory/research

    Little or no attempt to
    engage the class in
    learning

    Limited use of
    activities to clarify
    understanding

    Satisfactory
    response to
    class questions and
    discussion with
    limited reference
    to theory and
    research

    Limited response to
    questions and discussion
    with no reference to
    theory/research

    Note: 1. For contents group marks will be awarded and then peer rating will be taken to award individual
    marks.
    2. For Presentation individual marks will be given.

    Page 2 of 3

    Page 3 of 3

    You might also like