FYP Proposal Guidelines
FYP Proposal Guidelines
FYP Proposal Guidelines
1.0
INTRODUCTION
The contents of this guideline shall support the aims, objectives and schemes as
specified in the UniKL MICET FYP Manual and Syllabus. It also explains the
marking criteria to guide the award of mark for assessed work.
2.0
FORMAT
The project proposal should have the following format:
Title Page
Table of Contents
Introduction
Problem Statement
Objectives
Literature Review
Methodology
Expected Result/ Potential Contributions
Research Plan
Budget
Conclusion
References
Title Page
Table of Contents
Introduction
Sets the context for the proposed project and must capture the
readers interest
Explain the background of the study from a broad picture
narrowing in on the research/ project question
Review what is known about the research topic as far as it is
Problem Statement
Objectives
Literature Review
Give a concise and clear outline of the aims that the researcher
want to achieve from the project
A short and precise overview about the present state of
research that is immediately connected with the proposed
project
Name and discuss the most important contributions of other
related projects/findings
Methodology
Expected Result/
Potential
Contributions
Research Plan
Budget
Conclusion
References
3.0
MARKING CRITERIA
The marking criteria adopted for the Proposal Report Assessment are as follows:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
SCORE
9-10
(Excellent)
STANDARD
7-8
(Good)
5-6
(Satisfactory)
Work for this mark will be of a marginally low standard and has barely
meets the stated requirements.
Work produced at this level provide evidence of the following:
Limited knowledge and understanding on the subject matters
Relevant material is presented, but in a manner that lacks order
and organisation
Report has been badly organized and unable to demonstrate
knowledge gained
Demonstrate minimal level of initiative and creativity in work
Fail to demonstrate critical understanding of the subject matters
Adequately presented the report in the recommended format and
of an appropriate length
3-4
(Poor)
Work for this mark will be of a generally low standard and fails to meets
the stated requirements.
Work produced at this level shows the following:
Inadequate knowledge and understanding on the subject matters
Shows virtually no evidence that material has been properly
understood
Report has been poorly structured and unable to demonstrate
knowledge gained
Demonstrate minimal level of initiative and creativity in work
Fail to demonstrate critical understanding of the subject matters
Fail to present a report in the recommended format and length
1-2
(Very Poor)