Advance of Ut
Advance of Ut
Advance of Ut
of Ultrasonic Examination
Ultrasonic Examination
Level 3 (EN 473)
Advanced Techniques
of Ultrasonic Examination
SAFT
TOFD
Phased Array
Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducer (EMAT)
Advanced Techniques
of Ultrasonic Examination
Automated Ultrasonic
Examination
Automated Ultrasonic Examination
Recording of data
Ultrasonic system
Position data by mechanical devices
• Scanning a cluster of probes along the surface
of the test object
or
• Fixed cluster of probes and moving of the test
object
Presentation of data
Correlation of the probe‘s position to the
ultrasonic data
Assembling of the
Examination Equipment
Probe 1
Triggering Control of Manipulator
Recording of Position Data
Probe n
Data
Storage
Stationary Equipment
Characteristics
stationary installed
examination of a specific assembly in production lines
high automation level
automated evaluation
high examination speed
Example
continuos in-production examination of steel products (plates,
bars, rails, tubes)
Machine for examination of objects like axel leg, rolls, screws,
balls, stud, cylinders
In-production examination of assemblies for mechanical
engineering (shaft, wheel disk)
Manufacturing inspection of objects for aerospace (composite
material, glas fiber reinforced plasticsre, carbon fiber reinforced
plastics)
In-process controlling (random test)
Mobile Equipment
Characteristics
not tied to a certain place
Response Locus of
Amplitude and Travel
Time
ALOK
Response Locus of Amplitude and Travel Time
amplitude
travel time response locus
travel time
amplitude
response locus
Processing of Signals
rectified A-scan (half-wave presentation)
dejamed and non-densified data
amplitude
A3 A4
A1 A5
A2
trevel time
AM
filter function
-6dB AM-2 < AM
rise time [half-wave]: i = 2 AM-1 ≤ AM
AM/2
decay time [half-wave]: k=3 AM+1 ≤ AM
AM+2 ≤ AM
AM+3 ≤ AM
A3 A4
A1 A5
A2
travel time
Signal Processing
λ
R = (k + 1) ⋅
2
Resolution depends on
decay of the signals (characteristic of the probe)
wave length
Interfering Amplitudes
stochastic
noise
interfering
interfering signal signal
stochastic noise
rough interface
echos due to geometrical shape
Signal Pattern Identification
of amplitudes noise
no dynamic in travel time
isolated points in response locus of
travel time
echos from interfaces and
geometric shape
dynamic in travel time, but the rise
time is not characteristic for the
technique
reduction of data
travel time
C-Scan y
x
lack of fusion
pore
x y
B-Scan D-Scan
z
Presentation as Response Locus
amplitude
SAFT
Basics
Imagining Technique
Analyzing technique of material defects
detected by searching technique
Determination of type, location, and dimensions of
defects is prerequisite for evaluating construction saftys
Developing of SAFT
based on RADAR technique (70th)
developed continuously to 3D-SAFT Algorithm
Resolution of Ultrasonic Examination
Optimized field of
application in a distance
to the defect according
to the near field length
1
2
3 Beam spread as
beam spread great as possible
Ultrasonic signals of
several defects in
2 3 the beam are
1
simultanously
detected
defect are located
on the arc, the
angle is unknown
Pixel (1,n)
Pixel (1,1)
Pixel (n,n)
Pixel (n,1)
Reconstruction of the reflector‘s location
(x, y)
Averageing of the Amplitude Signal
Production of a B-scan by summarizing the amplitudes of different
probe locations
constructive interference of material areas with high amplitude
destructive interference of material areas with statistic noise signals
Simulation of a focus probe with unique focussing power along the
complete depth range
Increasing the signal-to-noise ratio by increas of examination density
Pixel (l,m)
Resolution and Accuracy of the Reconstruction
L-wave
T-wave
T-wave
L-wave
L-wave
TL-LT
TLL
Geometry of the Object
TOFD
Basics
4 – 1: incidence wave
– 2: reflected wave
– 3: penetrated wave
– 4: defracted wave
1
2
4
Performance of Examination
Use of two probes scanning oposite to another
transmitter
receiver
located symmetrically to
the center of the weld
couple of probes
are moved
parallel to
the weld
seam on
one path
(non
parallel
examination)
Performance of Examination
transmitter Receiver
upper tip of
crack reflection
back wall
lower tip of
surface crack
wave
Performance of examination
Generally use of longitudinal waves
using transverse waves generates mode conversion that may
complicate the interpretation of the signals
Storage of HF signal every 1 mm on the scanning path
Digitalizing frequency equal to to higher than four times
nominal frequency of the probes
Range between
Signal of surface wave and
backwall signal
Large beam spreed
large examination volume
one couple of probes sufficient for wall thickness up to 70 mm
Performance of Examination
Maximum defraction when acoustic axis are orientated
120° one to another
setting the probe distance according to the expected depth of
the defects
Adapting to different geometries by
probe distance
probe frequency
size of transducers
Signal of defraction is low
about 20 dB to 30 dB below the level of the reflected signal
using puls-echo technique
considerable influence on the condition of the scanning
surface
no evaluation of signal height
upper crack tip
reflection of backwall
surface wave
movement
of probes
depends on