Data Analysis and Interpretation: Male 139 55.6 Female 111 44.4
Data Analysis and Interpretation: Male 139 55.6 Female 111 44.4
Data Analysis and Interpretation: Male 139 55.6 Female 111 44.4
TABLE 4.1
AGE OF THE RESPONDENT
TABLE 4.1
SEX RATIO OF THE RESPONDENTS
CHART 4.1
SEX RATIO OF THE RESPONDENTS
160
140
120
40
20
0
Male Female
INTERPRETATION:
The graphical representation of the table shows that out of the 250 Respondents, 139 were
male and 111 were female.
TABLE 4.2
OCCUPATION OF THE RESPONDENTS’ FAMILY
2 Professional 34 13.6
3 Business 76 30.4
4 Others 31 12.4
CHART 4.2
OCCUPATION OF THE RESPONDENTS’ FAMILY
120
100
80
Number of the
Respondents
60
Percentage of the
Respondents
40
20
0
Service Professional Business Others
INTERPRETATION
The graphical representation of the table shows that out of the 250 respondents, 109
respondents belong to the service family, 76 were from business, 34 were from the
professional and 31 were from the others family.
TABLE 4.3
INCOME LEVEL OF THE RESPONDENTS FAMILY
2 15,001-25,000 61 24.4
3 25,001-35,000 52 20.8
CHART 4.3
INCOME LEVEL OF THE RESPONDENTS FAMILY
120
100
60
Percentage of the
40 Respondents
20
0
Less than 15,001- 25,001- 35,001 &
15,000 25,000 35,000 above
INTERPRETATION
The graphical representation of the table shows that out of the 250 respondents,
101 respondents were from the family whose income is less than 15,000, 61 respondents were
from the family whose income is between the 15,001 – 25,000, 52 respondents were from the
family whose income is between 25,001- 35,000 and rest were from the family whose income
is above 35,001.
TABLE 4.4
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND OF THE RESPONDENT’S PARENTS
2 Intermediate 23 9.2
3 Graduate 89 35.6
5 Other 6 2.4
CHART 4.4
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND OF THE RESPONDENT’S PARENTS
120
100
80 Number of the
Respondents
60
Percentage of the
40 Respondents
20
0
l
oo te te te er
h ia ua ua th
sc ed ra
d d O
gh rm G ra
G
Hi In
te st
Po
INTERPRETATION:
The graphical representation shows that out of the 250 respondents, 98 respondent’s parents
are post graduate, 89 respondent’s parents are graduate, 34 respondent’s parents are high
school, 23 are intermediate and rest have others educational background.
180
160
140
120 No of the respondents
100
80 Percentage of
60 Respondents
40
20
0
kia ng so
n LG o la he
rs
No su ri c t or t
m o O
Sa n yE M
So
INTERPRETATION
Out of the 250 respondents, 155 are using the Nokia phones, 34 are using the Sony Ericson, 6
are using the Sumsung, 22 are using the LG, 22 are using the Motorola and 11 are using the
Others.
80
70
60
50
Number of the Respondents
40
Percentage of the Respondents
30
20
10
0
Less than 1 1-2 year 2-4year Above 4 year
year
INTERPRETATION
Out of the 250 respondents 48 are using for less than year, 75 are using for 1-2years, 56 are
using for 2-4 years, 71 are using for above 4 years.
100
90
80
70
60 Number of the Respondents
50
40 Percentage of the Respondents
30
20
10
0
Less than 1 1-2 year 2-4year Above 4 year
year
INTERPRETATION
Out of the 250 respondents 59 are using for less than year, 88 are using for 1-2years, 48 are
using for 2-4 years, 60 are using for above 4 years.
What will you be willing to pay for OPPO a mobile phone by respondents.
4 Any amount 60 24
140
120
40
20
0
Less than 10,001- 20,001- any
10,000 20,000 40,000 amount
INTERPRETATION:
The graphical representation shows that out of the 250 respondents, 142 respondents were
willing to spend less than 10,000, 86 were willing to spend between 10,001 to 20,000, 15
were willing to pay between 20,001 to 40,000 and rest were ready to pay any amount.
2 Samsung 43 17.2
4 LG 11 4.4
Motorola 24 9.6
Iphone 2 .8
Blackberry 4 1.6
Other 2 .8
TOTAL 250 100