Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

A Novel Visual Siso and Mimo Computer Interface For Process Production System

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

International Journal of Mechanical and Production

Engineering Research and Development (IJMPERD)


ISSN(P): 2249-6890; ISSN(E): 2249-8001
Vol. 8, Issue 2, Apr 2018, 181-188
© TJPRC Pvt. Ltd.

A NOVEL VISUAL SISO AND MIMO COMPUTER INTERFACE

FOR PROCESS PRODUCTION SYSTEM

MANIKANDAN. C, NEELAMEGAM. P, RAKESH KUMAR. S & SAI SIVA SATWIK. K


Control, Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical and Robotics Engineering (CALIBRE) Research Group,
School of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, SASTRA University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India
ABSTRACT

Computer based automation systems have found a wide range of applications in manufacturing and processing
industries. To interface computer and control system, various standard industrial interfaces were used. Because of its
complexity and high cost in some places, a custom model was built by a person having broad knowledge of computer and
control system. Later on visual patterns based computer interfacing was introduced. This used less hardware when
compared to the standard model. To further reduce its hardware complexity, in this paper, a modified vision based
computer interfacing is introduced for single input single output (SISO) systems. This technique is further extended for
multiple inputs and multiple output systems (MIMO). The working of the proposed interface modules were tested with
the help of computer control based SISO conical liquid tank system and MIMO heat exchanger system.

Original Article
KEYWORDS: Computer, Closed-Loop Control System, Computer Interface, SISO & MIMO

Received: Jan 04, 2018; Accepted: Jan 25, 2018; Published: Feb 27, 2018; Paper Id.: IJMPERDAPR201820

INTRODUCTION

Control systems found various applications in almost all industries and home appliances. Introduction of
automation into control systems had become a revolutionary success in all its applications. Automation is widely
implemented in manufacturing industries, processing industries, power supply stations, and construction fields. Its
applications extend to electrical grid lines and household applications [1, 2]. This improves efficiency, time
consumption and productivity. Automation system usually consists of various processors that perform several
process and exchange signals using various interfaces. The industrial standard interfacing module like ADAM-5000
series requires large amount of hardware such as I-V(Current to Voltage ) converter, ADC (Analog-to-Digital
Converter), microprocessor, DAC (Digital to Analog Converter), V-I(Voltage to Current) converter, and UART
protocols (Universal Asynchronous Receiver and Transmitter ) to RS-232 protocols conversion for data acquisition
and control [3]. A flexible, custom-made microcontroller-based data acquisition device was built in [4]. The custom
model mentioned in [4] uses microcontroller with an integrated USB transceiver and ADC. Comparatively custom
model requires fewer components than standard interface model. To further reduce the complexity a vision based
computer interfacing is developed which replace processor and complex protocols with LED (Light Emitting
Diode), inbuilt hardware, image processing software and LDRs (Light Dependent Resistor). Many applications
namely automation in shipbuilding, monitoring of industrial flotation and angular measurement have been
implemented with vision based computer interfacing [5-8]. A dynamic pattern based visual interfacing for
automation using adaptive proportional−integral (PI) controller technique has been developed with low cost [9-11].
In complicated automatic control system such as chemical plant, constantly, more than one independent parameters

www.tjprc.org editor@tjprc.org
182 Manikandan. C, Neelamegam. P, Rakesh Kumar. S & Sai Siva Satwik. K

need to be measured and controlled at the same time [12]. However most of these techniques require conversion circuits
like ADC, DAC, I-V and V-I converters. The proposed interfacing technique eliminate all these complexity and utilizes
only an intensity property of an LED to communicate physical data through the inbuilt camera of the computer and the
control signal is received by LDR to manipulate the process. This technique reduces the design complexity of interfacing
module resulting in simplicity and low cost for both SISO and MIMO computer based control system.

SYSTEM MODELS

In this section, proposed system model is structured as follows:

• Visual SISO Interface: A computer interfacing system for single input and single output scenario.

• Visual MIMO Interface: An extended version of computer interfacing for multiple inputs multiple output
scenarios.

In order to design these interface an optical transceiver circuit was built with the help of LED, LDR and built in
computer components such as camera and monitor.

Visual SISO Interface

Figure 1: Block Diagram Representation of Computer Interfacing for SISO System

Visual SISO interface for SISO system is shown in Figure ure1 to measure the process system parameters.
A Direct Current bias Voltage (VDC) is supplied to a sensor. It reads the system parameter and converts its reading in the
form of a Direct Current (DC) varying from 4-20 mA. This DC is supplied to the LED through a resistor as shown in
Figure 2. The sensor’s internal resistance, LED internal resistance, wire resistance and the resistance in series with LED in
the transmitter circuit are considered to maintain the DCloop of the circuit in the range of 4-20 mA.

Figure 2: Circuit for Transmitter

LED converts DC into light intensity. The intensity variation is captured by an inbuilt camera of the computer.
Therefore, this LED and camera setup is basically referred as an optical transceiver circuit. The output of the transceiver
circuit is given to the adaptive PI controller. It generates a control signal. Then this generated control signal is converted
into light intensity value with the help of LED projected on the monitor. Here LED is built with help of GUI (Graphical
User Interface).

Impact Factor (JCC): 6.8765 NAAS Rating: 3.11


A Novel Visual SISO and MIMO Computer Interface for Process Production System 183

Figure 3: Circuits for Receiver

An LDR connected in series between VDC and actuator is placed exactly on the position of LED to detect the
light signal as shown in Figure 3. The variable resistance of the LDR and the internal resistance of the actuator are
considered to maintain the DC loop in the range of 4-20mA. LDR resistance dynamically varies with respect to the light
intensity received from LED. As the result of this process DC supplied to the actuator varies from 4-20 mA. Then the
Actuator automatically controls the control system based on variation in DC value.

Software Description

The color images obtained by the camera are converted into grayscale images and LED is selected as the region of
interest (ROI). The intensity of the LED is calculated using average algorithm and the values are noted. The noted values
are fed to the adaptive PI controller to generate the control signal. This control signal is fed to actuator to manipulate the
process for the desired response. This control signal is converted into intensity value and is displayed on the monitor with
the help of GUI.

Visual MIMO Interface

Figure 4: Block Diagram Representation of Computer


Interfacing for MIMO System

An extension of the proposed SISO interface is shown in Figure 4. In this system, multiple parameters of the
system are measured and controlled at the same time. Four different sensors are used to measure 4 different parameters
such as pressure, temperature, flow and level of the process system. All the sensors are connected in parallel with each
other to a power supply as shown in Figure.5 such that current in each loop of the circuit is maintained in the range of 4-20
mA based on the sensor output. These variations are converted into light intensity by 4 LEDs connected in series with 4
different sensors. On the other side, a single inbuilt camera to the computer captures the light intensities and passes these 4
independent light intensity values to the adaptive PI controller. It generates 4 control signals and these control signals are
again converted into light intensity with help of 4 different LEDs built on the monitor using GUI.

www.tjprc.org editor@tjprc.org
184 Manikandan. C, Neelamegam. P, Rakesh Kumar. S & Sai Siva Satwik. K

Figure 5: Transmitter Circuit for MIMO

On the other side, four independent LDRs connected in series with four actuators and parallel with power supply
as shown in Figure 6 are placed exactly on the position of LEDs on the display such that each LDR receive light from only
one LED, LDR’s resistance dynamically varies with respect to the light intensity received from LEDs. As the result of this
process DC supplied to the all four actuators varies from 4-20 mA. Then the Actuators automatically control 4 independent
control systems in parallel.

Figure 6: Receiver Circuit for MIMO

Software Description

In this system, Unlike SISO system, color image obtained by the camera contains four LEDs. These LEDs are
spatially separated from each other. So, the obtained image is segmented into four parts such that each part contains only
one LED. Each LED is set as ROI and intensity of each LED is calculated. These four different intensity values are given
to the adaptive PI controller to generate four different control signals. These control signals are fed into four different
actuators to manipulate parameters of the control system. These control signals are converted into intensity values and are
displayed with four LEDs on the monitor with the help of GUI.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

The proposed SISO interface technique is implemented and tested for a level control of a conical tank system as
shown in Figure 7. The level of the tank is measured using a Differential Pressure Transmitter (DPT) and is acquired by the
computer using the proposed Analog interface (AI) technique. The error between the desired and the actual level is
calculated and used to generate the control action by an adaptive PI controller [1]. Then the control action is translated into
the corresponding intensity with the help of GUI shown in Figure 9. The proposed Analog Output (AO) interface is used to

Impact Factor (JCC): 6.8765 NAAS Rating: 3.11


A Novel Visual SISO and MIMO Computer Interface for Process Production System 185

control the valve position which in turn regulates the inflow to the conical tank. Thus, the desired level is achieved.

Further, the proposed vision based MIMO interface techniques is implemented and tested with the MIMO Heat
exchange system as shown in Figure 8. Four Resistance Temperature Detector (RTD) sensors are interfaced with the
computer which can give information about the heat exchange process. Using this information, Adaptive PI controller
generates corresponding control variables in terms of intensity using GUI shown in Figure 10 such that, hot and cold water
inflow has been regulated to achieve the desired temperature in the cold water. Additionally, the temperature of the hot
water resent into the reservoir is also controlled.

Figure 7: GUI for Computer SISO Interface

Figure 8: GUI for Computer MIMO Interface

Figure 9: Real Time Implementation and Testing of Computer


SISO Interface for Conical Tank System

www.tjprc.org editor@tjprc.org
186 Manikandan. C, Neelamegam. P, Rakesh Kumar. S & Sai Siva Satwik. K

Figure 10: Real Time Implementation and Testing of Computer


MIMO Interface for Heat Exchanger System

CONCLUSIONS

We observed that the proposed SISO interfacing model uses very less hardware components like LED, inbuilt
camera, monitor and LDR by eliminating I-V converter, ADC, processor, DAC and V-I converter used in most of the
standard and custom based interfacing modules. It also eliminated the complex protocols used for data acquisition and
control. When compared with existing vision based model, our proposed vision based model does not require I-V
converter, ADC, DAC and V-I converter and Hence, with all these comparisons, we conclude our proposed interface
module as less complex and low cost. Further, the proposed interfacing model was tested with MIMO system where the
speed and efficiency of the control system was considered to be important.

REFERENCES

1. Thakur, J., and Chakraborty, B. (2015) “Intelli-grid: Moving towards automation of electric grid in India” Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, Vol. 42, pp 16-25.

2. Suryadevara, N. K., Mukhopadhyay, S. C., Kelly, S. D. T., and Gill, S. P. S.(2014) “WSN-based smart sensors and actuator for
power management in intelligent buildings’. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 20(2), pp 564-571.

3. Advantech, “Distributed Data Acquisition and Control System” ADAM-5000 data sheet, (2017).

4. Hercog, D., Gergic, B., (2014) “A Flexible Microcontroller-Based Data Acquisition Device” Sensors.

5. Kim, M., Choi, W., Kim, B., Kim, H., Seol, J. H., Woo, J., and Ko, K. H. “A vision-based system for monitoring block assembly
in ship building”. CAD Computer Aided Design, 2015, Vol. 59, pp 98-108.

6. Mehrabi, A., Mehrshad, N., and Massinaei, M.(2014) ‘Machine vision based monitoring of an industrial flotation cell in an
iron flotation plant’. International Journal of Mineral Processing, Vol.133, pp 60-66.

7. Abinaya, N. S., Priya, V. R., and Kumar, S. R.(2012) “Applications of angular measurement using hit or miss transform”.
Sensors and Transducers, Vol. 138(3), pp. 71-79.

8. Abinaya, N. S., and Kumar, S. R. (2012) “Design of float-image level transmitter for level measurement using image
processing technique”. Sensors and Transducers, Vol. 145(10), pp 33-40.

9. Anand, S., Aswin, V., and Kumar, S. R (2011) “Simple tuned adaptive PI controller for conical tank process”. International
Conference on Recent Advancements in Electrical, Electronics and Control Engineering, IConRAEeCE'11 - Proceedings, 263-
267.

10. McMillan, G., Dasani, S., and Jagadeesan (2010) “Adaptive level control”, Control (Chicago, Ill), Vol.23 (2), pp 55-59.11.

Impact Factor (JCC): 6.8765 NAAS Rating: 3.11


A Novel Visual SISO and MIMO Computer Interface for Process Production System 187

11. Manikandan, C., Rakeshkumar, S., Neelamegam, P., Gayathri, S., and Bharathi, R. (2017) “A Novel Low-Cost Vision Based
Computer Interface Platform for Automation Using Dynamic Visual Patterns”, International Conference on National
Development through innovation in Management, Science and Technology..

12. Pothukuchi, RP and Amin, A., (2016) “Using Multiple Input, Multiple Output formal control maximize Resource Efficiency in
Architectures “, ACM/IEEE 43rd Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture.

www.tjprc.org editor@tjprc.org

You might also like