Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 142 views

    Evaluation of Presentations

    Uploaded by

    Vijay Pradeep
    The document describes the process for evaluating student presentations at the Tennessee State University Research Symposium. Judges, including academics and professionals external to the university, evaluate all oral and poster presentations using standardized evaluation forms. These forms judge presentations on criteria such as originality, organization, knowledge, and clarity. Oral presentations are 15 minutes with additional time for questions, while poster presentations involve explaining the research to judges with different levels of expertise in the field.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Evaluation of Presentations

    Uploaded by

    Vijay Pradeep
    142 views3 pages
    The document describes the process for evaluating student presentations at the Tennessee State University Research Symposium. Judges, including academics and professionals external to the university, evaluate all oral and poster presentations using standardized evaluation forms. These forms judge presentations on criteria such as originality, organization, knowledge, and clarity. Oral presentations are 15 minutes with additional time for questions, while poster presentations involve explaining the research to judges with different levels of expertise in the field.

    Original Description:

    Evaluation of presentations

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document describes the process for evaluating student presentations at the Tennessee State University Research Symposium. Judges, including academics and professionals external to the university, evaluate all oral and poster presentations using standardized evaluation forms. These forms judge presentations on criteria such as originality, organization, knowledge, and clarity. Oral presentations are 15 minutes with additional time for questions, while poster presentations involve explaining the research to judges with different levels of expertise in the field.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    142 views3 pages

    Evaluation of Presentations

    Uploaded by

    Vijay Pradeep
    The document describes the process for evaluating student presentations at the Tennessee State University Research Symposium. Judges, including academics and professionals external to the university, evaluate all oral and poster presentations using standardized evaluation forms. These forms judge presentations on criteria such as originality, organization, knowledge, and clarity. Oral presentations are 15 minutes with additional time for questions, while poster presentations involve explaining the research to judges with different levels of expertise in the field.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 3

    Judging and Evaluation of Presentations

    The Research Symposium Committee engages a formal process for evaluating student presentations. Judges selected
    for the Symposium at Tennessee State University include academic and corporate professionals, external to the
    University.

    All student presentations, graduate and undergraduate, are part of the competition. The committee uses evaluation
    forms developed with criteria that best reviews originality, creativity, knowledge, and overall image of the student’s
    presentation, whether oral or poster.

    Oral presentations are judged for originality and creativity, organization of content, oral presentation, knowledge of
    material, clarity of artwork (charts, graphs, slides), and overall presentation. Students are given 15 minutes for their
    presentation including questions from the judges. A number of judges will evaluate the oral presentation based on the
    student presenter’s explanation of the research, the content, dialogue with the presenter, and delivery of the
    presentation during the student’s 15-minute time allotment.

    Posters presentations are judged for organization and creativity, organization of content, technical procedures
    employed (when applicable), oral delivery, knowledge of material, clarity of artwork (charts, graphs, images),
    appearance of poster, and overall presentation. For poster presentations, three (3) judges evaluate each poster
    presentation based on the student’s explanation of the research, their ability to answer questions about the research,
    and the content and appearance of the poster. Students come to the Symposium prepared to explain their poster to a
    judge who is not familiar with their field and to one who may be an expert in the field.

    Evaluation forms for judging are available below. These forms are made available for students to know the categories
    for which their presentation will be evaluated. This information can be useful for practicing ahead of the Symposium.
    Tennessee State University
    37th Annual University-Wide Research Symposium, 2015
    Oral Presentation – Evaluation Form

    Session Presentation No.

    Category Possible Awarded


    Points Points

    I. Originality and Creativity 20 ________


    Theoretical or clinical significance of research
    Creativity and originality of logic
    Timeliness and uniqueness of ideas

    II. Organization (Logical presentation of ideas) 20 ________


    Objectives/goals are clearly stated.
    Methods are appropriate for achieving goals.
    Results are clearly presented.
    Thoughts and ideas flow in a logical manner.
    Results accomplish the purposes of the project.

    III. Presentation (Oral presentation and delivery) 20 ________


    Exhibits good body posture
    Maintains good eye contact with audience
    Good diction; good articulation

    IV. Knowledge of Material (Familiarity with subject 20 ________


    matter)
    Exhibits knowledge of subject matter
    Answers questions with confidence

    V. Neatness (Neatness of charts and graphs) 10 ________


    Neat slides and/or transparencies,
    free of marks and smudges
    Visual materials are easy to read.

    V. Overall Presentation 10

    TOTAL POINTS
    Tennessee State University

    37th Annual University-Wide Research Symposium, 2015


    Poster Presentation – Evaluation Form

    Session Poster No.

    Category Possible Awarded


    Points Points

    I. Originality and Creativity 20 ________


    Theoretical or clinical significance of research
    Creativity and originality of logic
    Timeliness and uniqueness of ideas

    II. Organization 20 ________


    Objectives/goals are clearly stated.
    Methods are clearly outlined.
    Results are clearly presented.
    Thoughts and ideas flow in a logical manner.

    III. Procedures 20 ________


    Data based on adequate sample size
    Methods appropriate for achieving goals
    Uses correct and appropriate statistical methods
    Provides valid and reliable data

    IV. Neatness 20 ________


    Materials are easy to read.
    Materials are free of marks and smudges.

    V. Overall Presentation 20 ________


    Materials are organized with smooth transitions
    (i.e., Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion).
    Style and language are appropriate to discipline.
    Charts, graphs, and/or illustrations are appropriate
    to subject investigated.
    Conclusion(s) is/are consistent with evidence.

    TOTAL POINTS

    You might also like