Lecture 4 - House Design
Lecture 4 - House Design
Lecture 4 - House Design
Example No.2: Design the roof slab, beam and column of house given in figure 1.1.
Concrete compressive strength (fc´) = 3 ksi.
Steel yield strength (fy) = 40 ksi.
Load on slab:
4″ thick mud.
2″ thick brick tile.
Live Load = 40 psf
9" Brick masonary wall
B1 B1
C1
A
R.C.C Column
Solution: -
(1) Design of slab “S2”:
Step No 1: Sizes.
lb/la = 24.75/8 = 3.09 > 2 “one way slab”
Assume 5″ slab.
Span length for end span according to ACI 8.7 is minimum of:
(i) l = ln+ hf = 8 + (5/12) = 8.42′
(ii) c/c distance between supports = 9.0625′
1.5" Expansion Joint
Therefore l = 8.42′
Slab thickness (hf) = (l/20) x (0.4+fy/100000) [for fy < 60000 psi]
= (8.42/20) x (0.4 + 40000/100000) x 12
= 4.04″ (Minimum requirement of ACI 9.5.2.1).
Therefore take hf = 5″
d = hf – 0.75 – (3/8)/2 = 4″
Step No 2: Loading.
Step No 3: Analysis.
Mu = wul2/8 (l = span length of slab)
Mu = 0.211 x (8.42)2/8
= 1.87 ft-k/ft = 22.44 in-k/ft
Step No 4: Design.
Asmin = 0.002bhf (for fy 40 ksi, ACI 10.5.4)
= 0.002 x 12 x 5 = 0.12 in2
a = Asminfy/ (0.85fc′b)
= 0.12 x 40/ (0.85 x 3 x 12) = 0.156 in
ΦMn(min) = ΦAsminfy (d – a/2)
= 0.9 x 0.12 x 40 x (4 – 0.156/2)
= 16.94 in-k < Mu
Therefore,
• As = Mu/ {Φfy (d – a/2)}
Take a = 0.2d
As = 22.44/ {0.9 x 40 x (4 – (0.2 x 4)/2)}
As = 0.173 in2
• a = 0.173 x 40/ (0.85 x 3 x 12) = 0.226 in
As = 22.44/ {0.9 x 40 x (4 – (0.226/2))}
= 0.160 in2
• a = 0.160 x 40/ (0.85 x 3 x 12) = 0.209 in
As = 22.44/ {0.9 x 40 x (4 – (0.209/2))}
= 0.160 in2, O.K.
Step No 2: Loads.
Factored Load (wu) = wu, dl + wu, ll
wu = 1.2D.L + 1.6L.L
wu = 1.2 x 0.1225 + 1.6 x 0.04 (see table 1.1 above)
= 0.147 + 0.064 = 0.211 ksf
Step No 3: Analysis.
The precise determination of moments in two-way slabs with various conditions
of continuity at the supported edges is mathematically formidable and not suited
to design practice. For this reason, various simplified methods have been adopted
for determining moments, shears, and reactions of such slabs.
According to the 1995 ACI Code, all two-way reinforced concrete slab systems,
including edge supported slabs, flat slabs, and flat plates, are to be analyzed and
designed according to one unified method, such as Direct design Method and
Equivalent Frame Method. However, the complexity of the generalized approach,
particularly for systems that do not meet the requirements permitting analysis by
“direct design method” of the present code, has led many engineers to continue to
use the design method of the 1963 ACI Code for the special case of two-way
slabs supported on four sides of each slab panel by relatively deep, stiff, edge
beams.
This method has been used extensively since 1963 for slabs supported at the
edges by walls, steel beams, or monolithic concrete beams having a total depth
not less than about 3 times the slab thickness. While it was not a part of the 1977
or later ACI Codes, its continued use is permissible under the ACI 318-95 code
provision (13.5.1) that a slab system may be designed by any procedure satisfying
conditions of equilibrium and geometric compatibility, if it is shown that the
design strength at every section is at least equal to the requires strength, and that
serviceability requirements are met.
The method makes use of tables pf moment coefficients for a variety of
conditions. These coefficients are based on elastic analysis but also account for
inelastic redistribution. In consequence, the design moment in either direction is
smaller by an appropriate amount than the elastic maximum moment in that
direction. The moments in the middle strip in the two directions are computed
from:
Ma = Cawla2
And Mb = Cbwlb2
Where Ca, Cb = tabulated moment coefficients
w = uniform load, psf
la, lb = length of clear spans in short and long directions respectively.
Case 6
lb = 16'
Coefficients for negative Coefficients for dead load Coefficients for live load
moments in slabs positive moments in slabs positive moments in slabs
Step No 4: Design.
Asmin = 0.002bhf = 0.002 x 12 x 5 = 0.12 in2
a = Asminfy/ (0.85fc′b)
= 0.12 x 40/ (0.85 x 3 x 12) = 0.156 in
Φ Mn(min) = ΦAsminfy (d – a/2)
= 0.9x 0.12 x 40 x (4-0.156/2) = 16.94 in-k (capacity provided by Asmin).
Φ Mn(min) is greater than Mb, pos, (dl + ll) but less than Ma, neg and Ma, pos, (dl + ll).
M b, pos, (dl + ll) = 0.712 ft-k = 8.544 in-k < Φ Mn(min)
Therefore, Asmin = 0.12 in2 governs.
Using 3/8″ Φ (#3) {#10, 10 mm}, with bar area Ab = 0.11 in2
Spacing = (0.11/0.12) x 12 = 11″
Maximum spacing according to ACI 13.3.2 for two way slab is:
2hf = 2 x 5 =10″
Therefore maximum spacing of 10″ governs.
Finally use #3 @ 9″ c/c (#10 @ 225 mm c/c).
“Provide #3 @ 9″ c/c as negative reinforcement along the longer direction.”
12.375' 12.375'
l n = 12.375 - 12/12 = 11.875' ln = 12.375 - 12/12 = 11.875'
Figure 1.4: c/c distance & clear span of Beam.
Step No 2: Loads.
Service Dead Load (D.L) = 0.0625 + 0.04 + 0.02 = 0.1225 ksf (Table 1.1)
Service Live Load (L.L) = 40 psf or 0.04 ksf
Beam is supporting 5' slab. Therefore load per running foot will be as follows:
Service Dead Load from slab = 0.1225 x 5 = 0.6125 k/ft
Service Dead Load from beam’s self weight = hwbwγc
= (13 x 12/144) x 0.15 = 0.1625 k/ft
Total Dead Load = 0.6125 + 0.1625 = 0.775 k/ft
Service Live Load = 0.04 x 5 = 0.2 k/ft
wu = 1.2D.L + 1.6L.L = 1.2 x 0.775 + 1.6 x 0.20 = 1.25 k/ft
Step No 3: Analysis.
Refer to ACI 8.3.3 or page 396, Nelson 13th Ed, for ACI moment and shear
coefficients.
1) AT INTERIOR SUPPORT:
Negative moment (Mneg) = Coefficient x (wuln2)
= (1/9) x {1.25 x (11.875)2}
= 19.59 ft-k = 235.08 in-k
2) AT MID SPAN:
Positive moment (Mpos) = Coefficient x (wuln2)
= (1/11) x {1.25 x (11.875)2}
= 16.02 ft-k = 192.24 in-k
Vint = 1.15wuln/2 = 1.15 x 1.25 x 11.875/2 = 8.54 k
Vu(int) = 8.54 – 1.25 x 1.25 = 6.97 k
Vext = wuln/2 = 1.25 x 11.875/2 = 7.42 k
Vu(ext) = 7.42 – 1.25 x 1.25 = 5.86 k
wu = 1.25 k/ft
ln = 11.875' ln = 11.875'
wu ln /2 1.15wu ln /2
ACI Shear
1.15wu ln /2 wu ln /2 Coefficients
Vu (ext) = 5.86 k
7.42 k
d = 1.25'
8.54 k
Vu(int) = 6.97 k
1/ 11 1/ 11 ACI Moment
0 0 Coefficients
1/ 9 1/ 9
235.08 in-k
Step No 4: Design.
(A) Flexural Design:
(1) For Positive Moment:
Step (a): According to ACI 8.10, beff for L-beam is minimum of:
(i) 6hf + bw = 6 x 5 + 12= 42″
(ii) bw + Span length of beam/12 = 12 + (12.75 x 12) /12 = 24.75″
(iii)Clear distance to the next web = Not Applicable
So beff = 24.75″
Step (b): Check if beam is to be designed as rectangular beam or L-beam.
(i). Assume a = hf = 5″
As = Mu/ {Φfy (d – a/2)}
As = 192.24/ {0.9 x 40 x (15-5/2)} = 0.427 in2
(ii).Re-calculate “a”:
a = Asfy/ (0.85fc′beff)
a = 0.427 x 40/ (0.85 x 3 x 24.75) = 0.271″ <hf
Therefore design beam as rectangular.
Trial #1:
As = 192.24/ {0.9 x 40 x (15 – 0.271/2)} = 0.359 in2
a = 0.359 x 40/ (0.85 x 3 x 24.75) = 0.228″
Trial #2:
As =192.24/ {0.9 x 40 x (15 – 0.228/2)} = 0.358 in2, O.K.
Step (c): Check for maximum and minimum reinforcement.
Asmax = ρmaxbwd
ρmax = 0.85 x 0.85 x (3/40) x {0.003/(0.003 + 0.005)} = 0.0203
Asmax = 0.0203 x 12 x 15 = 3.654 in2
Asmin = ρminbwd
Asmin = 0.005 x 12 x 15 = 0.9 in2
As = 0.358 in2 < Asmin, so Asmin governs.
Using 5/8″ Φ (#5) {#16, 16 mm}, with bar area Ab = 0.31 in2
No. of bars = As/Ab
= 0.90/0.31 = 2.90 ≈ 3 bars
Use 4 #5 bars {4 # 16 bars, 16 mm}.
Mu = 235.08 in-k
bw = 12″
h = 18″
d = 15″
(i) Trial #1:
As =Mu/ {Φfy (d – a/2)}
Let a = 0.2d
As =235.08 / [0.9 x 40 x {15-(0.2 x 15)/2)}] = 0.484 in2
a = 0.484 x 40/ (0.85 x 3 x 12) = 0.632″
(ii) Trial #2:
As = 235.08/ {0.9 x 40 x (15 – 0.632/2)} = 0.44 in2
a = 0.44 x 40/ (0.85 x 3 x 12) = 0.58″
(iii)Trial #3:
As = 235.08/ {0.9 x 40 x (15 – 0.58/2)} = 0.44 in2 <Asmin
So Asmin governs.
Using 5/8″ Φ (#5) {#16, 16 mm}, with bar area Ab = 0.31 in2
No. of bars = As/Ab
= 0.90/0.31 = 2.90 ≈ 3 bars
Use 4 #5 bars {4 # 16 bars, 16 mm}.
Tie bars:
Using 3/8″ Φ (#3) {#10, 10 mm} tie bars for 3/4″ Φ (#6) {#19, 19 mm} main bars
(ACI 7.10.5),
Spacing for Tie bars according to ACI 7.10.5.1 is minimum of:
(a) 16 x dia of main bar =16 x 3/4 =12″ c/c
(b) 48 x dia of tie bar = 48 x (3/8) =18″ c/c
(c) Least column dimension =12″ c/c
Finally use #3, tie bars @ 9″ c/c (#10, tie bars @ 300 mm c/c).
(5) Drafting:
(A) Slab “S1” and “S2”:
B
A A
MT2 MT2
MT1 MT2
MT2
M1 M1
M1 M1
M1 MT2
C1
B
Depth Bottom
Panel (in) Mark Reinforcement Mark Top reinforcement
3/8" φ @ 4.5" c/c Non continuous End
M1 3/8" φ @ 9" c/c MT1
3/8" φ @ 4.5" c/c Continouos End
S1 5"
M1 3/8" φ @ 9" c/c MT2 3/8" φ @ 9" c/c Non continuous Ends
#3 @ 9" c/c
#3 @ 9" c/c #3 @ 6" c/c #3 @ 4.5" c/c
L1/4 = 3'-0" L1/3 = 4'-0"
h = 5"
#3 @ 9" c/c
L1 = 12'-0"
SECTION A-A
1.5" Expansion Joint
#3 @ 4.5" c/c #3 @ 9" c/c
#3 @ 9" c/c #3 @ 9" c/c
#3 @ 9" c/c
L2/4 = 4'-0" L2/4 = 4'-0" L/4=2'-0" L/4=2'-0"
SECTION B-B
(B) Beam:
2 #5 Bars
A B B
A
0.33L = 4'-0" 0.33L = 4'-0"
A B B A
4 #5 Bars 4 #5 Bars
s /2=3.75"
L = 11'-10.5" L = 11'-10.5"
BEAM DETAIL
Notes: -
(1) Use graph A.3, Nelson 13th Ed for location of cut off for continuous beams..
(2) Use table A.7, Nelson 13th Ed for maximum number of bars as a single layer in beam stem.
#3,2 legged stirrups @ 7.5" c/c #3,2 legged stirrups @ 7.5" c/c
18" 18"
4 #5 Bars 4 #5 Bars
12" 12"
(C) Column:
4 #6 Bars
12"
4 #6 Bars
12"