Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 76 views

    Government of Pakistan: For Officers in Bps 19 & 20 Confidential

    Uploaded by

    Muhammad Saleem
    This document appears to be a performance evaluation report for officers in grades 19 and 20 of the Government of Pakistan. It contains sections for the officer to provide personal details and a job description. The reporting officer then evaluates the officer's performance, output, integrity, strengths/weaknesses. They recommend an overall grading and whether the officer is fit for promotion. The countersigning officer reviews the reporting officer's assessment and provides their own evaluation and recommendation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Government of Pakistan: For Officers in Bps 19 & 20 Confidential

    Uploaded by

    Muhammad Saleem
    76 views7 pages
    This document appears to be a performance evaluation report for officers in grades 19 and 20 of the Government of Pakistan. It contains sections for the officer to provide personal details and a job description. The reporting officer then evaluates the officer's performance, output, integrity, strengths/weaknesses. They recommend an overall grading and whether the officer is fit for promotion. The countersigning officer reviews the reporting officer's assessment and provides their own evaluation and recommendation.

    Original Title

    20138261781832608RevisedPERForBS1920.doc

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document appears to be a performance evaluation report for officers in grades 19 and 20 of the Government of Pakistan. It contains sections for the officer to provide personal details and a job description. The reporting officer then evaluates the officer's performance, output, integrity, strengths/weaknesses. They recommend an overall grading and whether the officer is fit for promotion. The countersigning officer reviews the reporting officer's assessment and provides their own evaluation and recommendation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    76 views7 pages

    Government of Pakistan: For Officers in Bps 19 & 20 Confidential

    Uploaded by

    Muhammad Saleem
    This document appears to be a performance evaluation report for officers in grades 19 and 20 of the Government of Pakistan. It contains sections for the officer to provide personal details and a job description. The reporting officer then evaluates the officer's performance, output, integrity, strengths/weaknesses. They recommend an overall grading and whether the officer is fit for promotion. The countersigning officer reviews the reporting officer's assessment and provides their own evaluation and recommendation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 7

    FOR OFFICERS IN BPS 19 & 20 CONFIDENTIAL

    GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

    Ministry /Division/ Service/Group


    Department/Office

    PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT

    FOR THE PERIOD 20 TO 20

    PART I

    (TO BE FILLED IN BY THE OFFICER REPORTED UPON)

    1. Name (in block letters)

    2. Personnel number

    3. Date of birth

    4. Date of entry in service

    5. Post held during the period (with BPS)

    6. Academic qualifications

    7. Knowledge of languages (Please indicate proficiency in speaking (S), reading (R) and writing (W)

    1
    8. Training received during the evaluation period (Training courses attended earlier,
    if any, may please be listed separately on the back page of the report).

    Name of course attended Duration with dates Name of institution and country

    9. Period served

    (i) In present post (ii) Under the reporting officer

    PART II

    (TO BE FILLED IN BY THE OFFICER REPORTED UPON)

    1. Job description

    2
    2. Brief account of achievements during the period supported by statistical data where
    possible. Targets given and actual performance against such targets should be
    highlighted. Reasons for shortfall, if any, may also be stated.

    PART III -
    (EVALUATION BY THE REPORTING OFFICER)

    1. Please comment on the officer's performance on the job as given in Part II (2) with
    special reference to his knowledge of work, ability to plan, organize and supervise,
    analytical skills, competence to take decisions and quality and quantity of output. How
    far was the officer able to achieve the targets? Comment on the officer's contribution,
    with the help of statistical data, if any, in the overall performance of the organization. Do
    you agree with what has been stated in Part II (2)?

    A B C D

    1 Quality of work Generally produces work


    Always produce work of exceptionally of poor quality.
    high Quality
    2 Output of work Always behind schedule;
    Always up-to-date; accumulates no very slow disposal.
    arrears

    3
    2. Integrity (Morality, uprightness and honesty)

    A B C D

    1. Integrity
    a. General Unscrupulous
    Irreproachable

    b. Intellectual
    Honest & straightforward Devious; Sycophant

    3. Pen picture including the officer's strengths and weaknesses with focus on
    emotional stability, ability to work under pressure, communication skills and
    interpersonal effectiveness. (Weakness will not be considered as adverse entry unless
    intended to be treated as adverse).

    4. Area and level of professional expertise with suggessions for future posting.

    4
    5. Training and development needs.

    6. Overall grading

    7. Fitness for promotion Comment on the officer's potential for holding a higher

    position and additional responsibilities.

    Name of the reporting officer Signature


    (Capital letters)

    Designation Date

    5
    PART IV

    (REMARKS OF THE COUNTERSIGNING OFFICER)

    1. How often have you seen the work of the officer reported upon?

    Very frequently Frequently Rarely Never

    2. How well do you know the officer? If you disagree with the assessment of
    the reporting officer, please give reasons.

    3. Overall grading

    4. Recommendation for promotion (Comment on the officer's potential for holding a


    higher position and additional responsibilities).

    6
    5. Evaluation of the quality of assessment made by the reporting officer.

    Exaggerated Fair Biased

    Name of the countersigning officer Signature


    (Capital letters)

    Designation Date

    PART V

    REMARKS OF THE SECOND COUNTERSIGNING OFFICER (IF ANY)

    Name Signature

    Designation Date

    You might also like