Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Heat Exchanger Efficiency: Journal of Heat Transfer September 2007

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/237144382

Heat Exchanger Efficiency

Article  in  Journal of Heat Transfer · September 2007


DOI: 10.1115/1.2739620

CITATIONS READS
51 36,973

1 author:

Ahmad Fakheri
Bradley University
53 PUBLICATIONS   215 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

The 2017 American Society of Thermal and Fluids Engineers (ASTFE) Conference View project

M.E. Thesis View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Ahmad Fakheri on 18 August 2014.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Heat Exchanger Efficiency
This paper provides the solution to the problem of defining thermal efficiency for heat
exchangers based on the second law of thermodynamics. It is shown that corresponding
to each actual heat exchanger, there is an ideal heat exchanger that is a balanced
counter-flow heat exchanger. The ideal heat exchanger has the same UA, the same arith-
metic mean temperature difference, and the same cold to hot fluid inlet temperature ratio.
Ahmad Fakheri The ideal heat exchanger’s heat capacity rates are equal to the minimum heat capacity
Professor rate of the actual heat exchanger. The ideal heat exchanger transfers the maximum
Department of Mechanical Engineering, amount of heat, equal to the product of UA and arithmetic mean temperature difference,
Bradley University, and generates the minimum amount of entropy, making it the most efficient and least
Peoria, IL 61625 irreversible heat exchanger. The heat exchanger efficiency is defined as the ratio of the
e-mail: ahmad@bradley.edu heat transferred in the actual heat exchanger to the heat that would be transferred in the
ideal heat exchanger. The concept of heat exchanger efficiency provides a new way for
the design and analysis of heat exchangers and heat exchanger networks.
关DOI: 10.1115/1.2739620兴

Keywords: heat exchangers, efficiency, heat exchanger efficiency, entropy minimization,


arithmetic mean temperature difference (AMTD), log-mean temperature difference
(LMTD), effectiveness-NTU

1 Introduction q
␧= 共2兲
The concept of efficiency is used in many areas, particularly Cmin共T1 − t1兲
engineering, to assess the performance of real components and
systems. Efficiency is a comparison between the actual 共real兲 and where the term in the denominator is the absolute maximum heat
ideal 共best兲 performances and is typically defined to be less than that can be transferred from a fluid at T1 to another fluid at t1. This
or at best equal to 1. The ideal behavior is generally known from maximum amount of heat transfer can only occur in a heat ex-
modeling, and the limitations dictated by physical laws, particu- changer whose area approaches infinity. Expressions and charts
larly the second law of thermodynamics. Knowing the ideal per- are available to determine the effectiveness of different heat ex-
formance, the actual performance can be determined if expres- changers, and are typically a function of two variables 共Cr and
sions for the efficiency as a function of the system characteristics NTU兲. The ␧-NTU method is mostly used in situations where the
and the operating conditions are known. Efficiency provides a size of the heat exchanger and the inlet temperatures are known
clear and intuitive measure of a system’s performance by showing and the heat transfer rate and the fluid exit temperatures are
how close an actual system comes to the best that it can be and if sought 共the rating problem兲, although sizing problems can also be
further improvements are feasible and justified. Despite much ef- solved with this method.
fort, the application of the second law to heat exchangers has not The author recently introduced the concept of heat exchanger
yielded a consistent method for assessing the performance of heat efficiency 关1–4兴. The heat exchanger efficiency is defined as the
exchangers. ratio of the actual rate of heat transfer in the heat exchanger 共q兲 to
Two of the more widely used approaches for analyzing heat the optimum rate of heat transfer 共qopt兲:
exchangers are the log-mean temperature difference method
共LMTD兲 and effectiveness NTU 共␧-NTU兲 method. In the LMTD q q
␩= = 共3兲
method qopt UA共T̄ − t̄兲

The optimum 共maximum兲 rate of the heat transfer is the product


q of UA of the heat exchanger under consideration and its arithmetic
F= 共1兲 mean temperature difference 共AMTD兲, which is the difference
UALMTD
between the average temperatures of hot and cold fluids. The rate
of heat transfer in any heat exchanger with the same UA and
where the term in the denominator is the maximum rate of heat AMTD is always less than the optimum value of the heat transfer
transfer, which takes place in a counter-flow heat exchanger hav-
rate 共␩ ⱕ 1兲 关1兴. Furthermore, the optimum heat transfer rate takes
ing the same UA and the same inlet and exit temperatures as the
place in a balanced counter-flow heat exchanger 关1兴.
heat exchanger under consideration. Expressions and charts are
The efficiency of a number of commonly used heat exchangers
available to determine F for different heat exchangers. These cor-
is given by the general expression
relations are typically a function of two parameters P and R that
depend solely on the inlet and exit temperatures. The LMTD ap- tanh 共Fa兲
proach is generally used for solving heat exchanger problems ␩= 共4兲
where the inlet and the exit temperatures are known and the size 共Fa兲
of the heat exchanger is to be determined 共sizing problems兲. where Fa, the fin analogy number, is the nondimensional group
In the ␧-NTU approach, the heat exchanger effectiveness is that characterizes the performance of different heat exchangers.
defined as This is a remarkable expression in that the efficiency of a wide
variety of heat exchangers has the same functional form as the
Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOUR-
efficiency of a constant area insulated tip fin. The expressions for
NAL OF HEAT TRANSFER. Manuscript received April 13, 2006; final manuscript re- Fa for some of the commonly used heat exchangers are given in
ceived November 16, 2006. Review conducted by Ramendra P. Roy. Table 1.

1268 / Vol. 129, SEPTEMBER 2007 Copyright © 2007 by ASME Transactions of the ASME

Downloaded 21 Dec 2009 to 129.5.16.227. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
Table 1 Fin analogy number of various heat exchangers

Counter Parallel Single stream Single shell

Fa= NTU共1 − Cr兲 2Ⲑ Ⲑ


Fa= NTU共1 + Cr兲 2 Fa= NTU Ⲑ 2 Ⲑ
Fa= NTU冑1 + Cr2 2

The efficiency expressions for cross flow heat exchangers are an infinitely long fin has an efficiency of zero, even though it still
more complex than Eq. 共4兲, however, for several cross-flow heat transfers a finite amount of heat. The same behavior can be seen
exchangers, Eq. 共4兲 can still be used with a high degree of accu- for a heat exchanger. As the overall heat transfer coefficient or the
racy by using a generalized fin analogy number 关2,4兴. It is also area of the heat exchanger increases, the fin analogy number 共Fa兲
important to note that the parallel flow and counter-flow heat ex- increases, leading to a reduction in the heat exchanger efficiency.
changers represent the low and high limits of efficiency for a However, as can be seen from Eq. 共7兲, the rate of heat transfer
given NTU and Cr, respectively. actually increases. Like a fin, an infinitely large heat exchanger
Figure 1 is a plot of the heat exchanger efficiency as a function has an efficiency of zero, even though it transfers a finite amount
of the fin analogy number. The maximum efficiency 共heat trans- of heat.
fer兲 occurs for Fa= 0, which, from Table 1, only happens for a Figure 2 is a plot of heat exchanger efficiency as a function of
balanced 共Cr = 1兲 counter-flow heat exchanger, or a balanced capacity ratio for a given NTU 共=3兲. As can be seen, the effi-
counter-flow heat exchanger has the efficiency of 100%. For a ciency of a counter-flow heat exchanger increases with capacity
given Fa, the efficiency is obtained from Eq. 共4兲 or Fig. 1 and the ratio, while the efficiency of shell and tube and parallel flow heat
heat transfer can be determined from Eq. 共3兲. exchangers actually decreases with increasing capacity ratio.
The analogy with fins provides additional insight into the con- The heat exchanger efficiency is based on the arithmetic mean
cept of heat exchanger efficiency. For a constant area fin, the temperature difference 共AMTD兲 of the heat exchanger as the driv-
efficiency is given by ing temperature potential and can be calculated from the knowl-

冉冑 冊
edge of the inlet temperatures 共the maximum temperature differ-
hp̄L2 ence in the heat exchanger兲 and NTU and efficiency through
tanh
kAx

冉冑 冊
␩= 共5兲 共T1 − t1兲

冉 冊
hp̄L2 T̄ − t̄ = 共8兲
1 + Cr
kAx 1 + ␩ NTU
2
The heat transfer rate from a fin can be written as Substituting from Eq. 共8兲 in Eq. 共3兲 results in

q = 冑kAxhp̄ tanh 冉冑 冊 hA
共Tb − T⬁兲 共6兲 1

冉 冊
kAxhp̄ q = ␩UA共T̄ − t̄兲 = Cmin共T1 − t1兲 共9兲
1 1 + Cr
+
Rearranging Eqs. 共3兲 and 共4兲, the rate of heat transfer rate for a ␩ NTU 2
counter-flow heat exchanger becomes
Note that the fraction on the right hand side of Eq. 共9兲 is the

冢 冣
2Cmin UA effectiveness of the heat exchanger and thus establishes the rela-
q= tanh 共T̄ − t̄兲 共7兲 tion between efficiency and effectiveness.
1 − Cr 2Cmin
Using the concept of heat exchanger efficiency for analyzing
1 − Cr heat exchanger rating and sizing problems is demonstrated by two
Although Eq. 共5兲 indicates that increasing the fin length or the examples 关5兴 in the Appendix. As can be seen, both types of
heat transfer coefficient leads to a reduction in the efficiency of a problems can be conveniently solved using the concept of heat
fin, the total amount of heat transfer actually increases with in- exchanger efficiency without the need for charts or complicated
creasing these two parameters as seen from Eq. 共6兲. In the limit, performance equations. Furthermore, the heat exchanger effi-

Fig. 1 Heat exchanger efficiency variation with capacity ratio

Journal of Heat Transfer SEPTEMBER 2007, Vol. 129 / 1269

Downloaded 21 Dec 2009 to 129.5.16.227. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
Fig. 2 Heat exchanger efficiency variation as with capacity ratio

ciency given by Eq. 共4兲 is only a function of one nondimensional ciated with the maximum efficiency for heat exchangers, clarify-
variable 共Fa兲, whereas effectiveness 共␧兲 depends on two param- ing how the second law can be extended to heat exchangers.
eters 共Cr and NTU兲, and the LMTD correction factor 共F兲 depends Consider a heat exchanger having an area A and an overall heat
also on two parameters 共P and R兲. The simple algebraic form of transfer coefficient of U, where the hot and cold fluids enter at
Eq. 共4兲 and its dependence on one single nondimensional group temperatures T1 and t1 with capacities Ch and Cc, respectively.
simplify heat exchanger calculations and greatly facilitate com- The heat exchanger efficiency is evaluated from Eq. 共4兲. The av-
parison of different heat exchangers. The concept of thermal effi- erage temperature difference in the heat exchanger is fixed and is
ciency provides a new and more convenient approach for analyz- determined from Eq. 共8兲. As shown above, a balanced counter
ing heat exchangers. flow heat exchanger where the hot and cold fluid capacities are
Like efficiency, the LMTD correction factor 共F兲 and the heat equal to the Cmin of the actual heat exchanger, having the same
exchanger effectiveness 共␧兲 are also less than 1, but the efforts to UA and AMTD will transfer the maximum amount of heat. The
relate them to the second law have not been successful. The chal- inlet temperatures of the hot and cold fluids of the balanced
lenge in defining a second-law-based efficiency for heat exchang- counter-flow heat exchanger are not specified; thus, infinitely
ers is defining an ideal heat transfer process in heat exchangers. many exchangers will transfer the same maximum amount of heat.
An isentropic process is the ideal process for many components The rest of the paper is to show among all these balanced counter-
and is used to define isentropic efficiency. This obviously cannot flow heat exchangers, the one having the same temperature ratio
be applied to a heat exchanger whose function is to transfer heat. 共t1 / T1兲 as the actual heat exchanger also generates the minimum
Since entropy production will not be zero 共notwithstanding the amount of entropy.
unrealistic case of an infinitely large heat exchanger兲, minimiza- Therefore, corresponding to an actual heat exchanger, there is
tion of entropy has been considered in heat exchanger analysis. an ideal balanced flow heat where the hot and cold fluid capacities
The application of this method to heat exchangers was first are equal to the Cmin of the actual heat exchanger. The ideal and
proposed by McClintock 关6兴. Bejan 关7兴 introduced a nondimen- actual heat exchangers have the same UA, the same AMTD, and
sional parameter, the number of entropy generation units Ns, as a the same inlet temperature ratio 共t1 / T1兲. The ideal heat exchanger
measure of heat exchanger irreversibility. Ns is the ratio of the transfers the maximum amount of heat, equal to the product of UA
total amount of entropy generated in the heat exchanger as a result and AMTD, while generating the minimum amount of entropy.
of irreversibilities associated with heat transfer and fluid friction, Note that from Eq. 共8兲 the inlet and exit temperatures of the fluids
and the maximum capacity rate. Aceves-Saborio et al. 关8兴 ex- in the ideal heat exchanger are different from those of the actual
tended the irreversibility minimization method by including a heat exchanger. The expressions for the determination of the ideal
term to account for the exergy of the heat exchanger material. temperatures will be presented later. Based on the second law, the
These approaches have found limited application in heat ex- ideal heat exchanger is, therefore, the most efficient 共transferring
changer design, partly due to the fact that the global optimum the maximum amount of heat兲 and least irreversible heat ex-
often leads to a heat exchanger with infinite area 关8兴. The efforts changer 共generating the minimum amount of entropy兲. This ideal
in linking the effectiveness of a heat exchanger to its rate of en- heat exchanger is the reference against which other heat exchang-
tropy production have also not been successful. The minimum ers can be compared and their efficiency assessed.
irreversibility does not appear to correlate with the effectiveness
of the heat exchanger, as pointed out by Shah and Skiepko 关9兴.
They showed that the heat exchanger effectiveness can be maxi-
mum or minimum at the minimum irreversibility operating point,
concluding that effectiveness is not a measure of heat exchanger 2 Analysis
reversibility 关9兴. The analysis presented below is to show that the Assuming heat transfer from the surroundings to be zero, and
efficiency defined above is based on the second law of thermody- the specific heats to be constant, the nondimensional rate of en-
namics. It will be shown that the minimum irreversibility is asso- tropy generation for a heat exchanger is given by 关9兴

1270 / Vol. 129, SEPTEMBER 2007 Transactions of the ASME

Downloaded 21 Dec 2009 to 129.5.16.227. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
Ch T2 Cc t2 Ch Rh P2 and capacity ratio. Therefore, the amount of entropy generated in
␴ = ␴T + ␴ f = ln + ln − ln the heat exchanger as given by Eqs. 共15兲 and 共16兲 is only a func-
Cmin T1 Cmin t1 Cmin c p,h P1
tion of temperature ratio, NTU, and capacity ratio.
Cc Rc p2 Figure 3 is a plot of entropy generated as a function of capacity
− ln 共10兲 ratio for different heat exchangers for both cases of the fluid with
Cmin c p,c p1
minimum capacity being the hot or the cold fluid. For a given
where NTU and inlet temperature ratio 共0.7兲, the entropy generated is a
decreasing function of capacity ratio for the three heat exchangers
Ṡgen
␴= 共11兲 shown, assuming its lowest value for the balanced flow condition.
Cmin For the conditions shown in Fig. 3共a兲 共NTU= 3兲 at all capacity
The first two terms can be considered as the amount of entropy ratios, the counter-flow heat exchanger is the least irreversible
produced due to temperature change, which is generally as a result heat exchanger, generating the least amount of entropy.
of heat transfer 共␴T兲, and the last two terms are due to pressure For the conditions shown in Fig. 3共b兲 共NTU= 1.1兲 at all capac-
change 共␴ P兲, which is generally due to flow irreversibilities, in- ity ratios, the parallel flow heat exchanger generates the least
cluding friction. amount of entropy. However, a parallel flow heat exchanger also
In defining an ideal heat transfer process based on the second has the lowest efficiency, transferring the least amount of heat
law, only irreversibilities caused by heat transfer need to be con- compared to the others and hence the reason for lower generation
sidered. These account for most of the irreversibilities as the pres- of entropy. As can be seen in Fig. 3, the minimum entropy is
sure drop across the heat exchanger is typically small, and for generated for the balanced flow condition. For the balanced flow
incompressible fluids, the entropy change is only a function of conditions, substituting Cr = 1 in Eqs. 共15兲 and 共16兲 and simplify-
temperature. Mohamed 关10兴 also showed that the entropy genera- ing, results in

冉 冊冉 冊
冤 冥
tion number due to pressure is too low compared with that due to t1 T1
temperature 共␴ P  ␴T兲, so it can be neglected. The irreversibility 1+ NTU ␩ 1 + NTU ␩
T1 t1
due to heat transfer is given by 共␴T兲min = ln 共17兲
共1 + NTU ␩兲2
Ch T2 Cc t2
␴T = ln + ln 共12兲 that is the minimum amount of entropy generated for any heat
Cmin T1 Cmin t1 exchanger regardless of which fluid has the minimum capacity.
Eliminating the exit temperatures The minimum entropy generated given by Eq. 共17兲 is plotted in

␴T =
Ch
Cmin
ln 1 −
q

C hT 1
+
Cc
Cmin

ln 1 +
q
C ct 1
冉 冊 共13兲
Fig. 4 as a function of the product of heat exchanger efficiency
and the number of transfer units for several temperature ratios. As
can be seen, the minimum entropy generated increases and
Substituting for q from Eq. 共8兲 results in reaches a maximum value and then decreases as the product
␩ NTU increases. This was first pointed out by Tribus and re-

冤 冥
1 1 共T1 − t1兲 ported by Bejan 关11兴 for a balanced counter-flow heat exchanger.

冉 冊
␴T = ln 1 −
Cmin 1 1 Ch T1 This behavior is sometimes referred to as the entropy generation
+ 1+ paradox and so far has only been reported for balanced counter-
Ch Cmin 2 Cc
NTU ␩ flow heat exchangers. A number of explanations 关12,13兴 have
Ch been provided as to why such a behavior is observed for a

冤 冥
1 1 共T1 − t1兲 counter-flow heat exchanger.

冉 冊
+ ln 1 + Equation 共17兲 shows for all balanced flow heat exchangers, and
Cmin 1 1 Cc t1 not just counter-flow ones, that as the product ␩ NTU increases,
+ 1+
Cc Cmin 2 Ch the amount of entropy generated also increases to a maximum
NTU ␩ before decreasing. For all heat exchangers under the balanced
Cc
flow condition, when NTU ␩ = 1, the entropy generation reaches a
共14兲 maximum value of

冉 冊冉 冊
from which the amount of entropy generated can be calculated.

冤 冥
Either the cold or the hot fluid can have the minimum capacity. t1 T1
1+ 1+
Assuming Cc = Cmin results in T1 t1
共␴T兲 M = ln 共18兲
冉 冊
冤 冥
1 1 t1 4
␴T = ln 1 − Cr 1− Since the efficiency of a balanced counter-flow heat exchanger is
Cr 1 1 + Cr T1
+ 1, maximum entropy generation for a counter-flow heat exchanger
NTU ␩ 2
happens at NTU= 1, which confirms the results of Bejan 关11兴.

冉 冊
冤 冥
1 T1 Substituting efficiency expressions of shell and tube and parallel
+ ln 1 + −1 共15兲 flow heat exchangers in Eq. 共17兲 shows that the maximum for a
1 1 + Cr t1
+ shell and tube heat exchanger occurs at NTU= 1.2455, and for a
NTU ␩ 2 parallel flow heat exchanger at NTU→ ⬁.
and assuming Ch = Cmin, Eq. 共14兲 becomes Figure 5 shows the variation of the minimum entropy generated

冉 冊
共Eq. 共17兲兲 normalized by its maximum 共Eq. 共18兲兲 for three types

冤 冥
1 t1 of heat exchangers for a given value of the temperature ratio 共0.1兲.
␴T = ln 1 − 1−
1 1 + Cr T1 For each value of NTU, efficiency is calculated from the expres-
+ sions of Table 1, under the balanced flow condition. The general
NTU ␩ 2

冉 冊
behavior seen in Fig. 5 is valid for all temperature ratios. The

冤 冥
1 1 T1 region near the point of maximum entropy is magnified to show
+ ln 1 + Cr −1 共16兲 the details of the behavior near this point. As can be seen, at a
Cr 1 1 + Cr t1
+ given NTUⱖ 1.2, a balanced counter-flow heat exchanger gener-
NTU ␩ 2
ates less entropy compared to the other heat exchangers, even
The product of NTU and ␩ for four different heat exchangers can though, having a higher efficiency, it transfers more heat. For
be obtained from Table 1 and Eq. 共4兲 and is a function of NTU small values of NTU, parallel flow or shell and tube heat exchang-

Journal of Heat Transfer SEPTEMBER 2007, Vol. 129 / 1271

Downloaded 21 Dec 2009 to 129.5.16.227. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
Fig. 3 Entropy generation with capacity ratio for different heat exchangers

ers generate less entropy than the counter-flow heat exchanger, evaluated for a balanced parallel flow heat exchanger 共␩
due to their low efficiency 共Fig. 2兲 and low heat transfer rates. ⫽tanh NTU/NTU兲
The minimum amount of entropy generated for a balanced
counter-flow heat exchanger 共␩ = 1兲 is obtained from 冉 1+
t1
冊冉 T1
NTU 1 + NTU 冊
冉 冊冉 冊
T1 t1

冤 冥
t1 T1
1+ NTU 1 + NTU 共NTU + 1兲2

冉 冊冉 冊
T1 t1
共␴T兲min = ln 共19兲 t1 T1
共NTU + 1兲2 1+ tanh NTU 1 + tanh NTU
T1 t1
The point where the crossover, for example, for parallel flow ex- = 共20兲
changer, occurs is found by equating Eq. 共17兲 evaluated for bal- 共tanh NTU + 1兲2
anced counter-flow heat exchanger 共␩ = 1兲 to the same equation, Equation 共20兲 simplifies to

1272 / Vol. 129, SEPTEMBER 2007 Transactions of the ASME

Downloaded 21 Dec 2009 to 129.5.16.227. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
Fig. 4 Variation of entropy generation with ␩ NTU in balanced flow heat
exchangers

NTU tanh NTU = 1 共21兲 the ideal heat exchanger is a balanced counter-flow one, having
the same UA as the actual heat exchanger where the hot and cold
which results in the solution NTU= 1.199679⬵ 1.20. Note that at
the crossover point, the parallel flow heat exchanger has an effi- fluid capacities are equal to the Cmin of the actual heat exchanger.
ciency ␩ = 0.69%. The ideal and actual heat exchangers have the same AMTD, and
There is only one ideal heat exchanger corresponding to the the same temperature ratio 共t1 / T1兲. The ideal heat exchanger has
specified heat exchanger under consideration. It is also helpful to an efficiency of 1 and transfers the maximum amount of heat
further explore the idealized heat exchanger. As mentioned before, given by

Fig. 5 Scaled entropy generation variation with NTU for different heat
exchangers

Journal of Heat Transfer SEPTEMBER 2007, Vol. 129 / 1273

Downloaded 21 Dec 2009 to 129.5.16.227. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
Fig. 6 Variation of the ideal temperatures as a function of the temperature
ratio

q = UA共T̄ − t̄兲 共22兲 3 Conclusions


and generates the minimum amount of entropy given by Eq. 共19兲. The heat exchanger efficiency is defined as the ratio of the
The inlet and exit temperatures of the ideal heat exchanger 共opti- actual heat transfer in a heat exchanger to the optimum heat trans-
mum values兲 are higher than those of the actual heat exchanger. fer rate. For some of the commonly used heat exchangers, the
Using Eqs. 共8兲 and 共9兲, it can be shown that they can be deter- efficiency expressions have the same simple algebraic function,
mined from similar to the efficiency of a constant area fin with an insulated tip
and are a function of a single nondimensional parameter called a
t1 fin analogy 共Fa兲 number. For a given heat exchanger and its op-
o* to1 T1 erating condition, there exists an ideal heat exchanger, which
t1 = = 共23兲 transfers the maximum amount of heat and generates the mini-
共1 + NTU兲共T̄ − t̄兲 1 − t1 mum amount of entropy. The actual heat transfer from the heat
T1 exchanger is obtained by multiplying its efficiency and the opti-
mum heat transfer rate, given by the product UA and the arith-
* to2 NTU metic mean temperature difference. The ideal heat exchanger also
to2 = = to*
1 + 共24兲
共1 + NTU兲共T̄ − t̄兲 1 + NTU generates the minimum amount of entropy. The concept of heat
exchanger efficiency provides a new and more convenient way for
To1 the design and analysis of heat exchangers and heat exchanger
To*
1 = = 1 + to*
1 共25兲 networks.
共1 + NTU兲共T̄ − t̄兲

To2 1
To*
2 = = to*
1 + 共26兲 Nomenclature
共1 + NTU兲共T̄ − t̄兲 1 + NTU
A ⫽ heat exchanger surface area, m2
The closer the inlet and exit temperatures of the actual heat ex- Ax ⫽ fin cross section area, m2
changer are to their optimum values, the closer the heat exchanger AMTD ⫽ arithmetic mean temperature difference;
is to its ideal performance. Equation 共23兲 is plotted in Fig. 6, and AMTD= 共T̄ − t̄兲
represents the ideal nondimensional inlet temperature of the cold Cc ⫽ heat capacity rate of the cold fluid Cc = 共ṁc p兲c
fluid. The temperature ratio for Examples 1 and 2 is t1 / T1
Ch ⫽ heat capacity rate of the hot fluid Ch = 共ṁc p兲h
= 0.668, where temperatures are in Kelvin. The inlet and exit tem-
peratures of the ideal heat exchanger can be determined from Eqs. Cmin ⫽ minimum heat capacity rate =min共Cc , Ch兲
共23兲–共26兲. For example, the optimum inlet temperature of the cold Cmax ⫽ maximum heat capacity rate =max共Cc , Ch兲
fluid is 40.7° C as compared to the actual temperature of 16° C. c p ⫽ constant pressure specific heat
The methodology described in this paper can also be used for Cr ⫽ capacity ratio Cr = Cmin CmaxⲐ
optimization of heat exchangers, by defining an objective function F ⫽ LMTD correction factor
and relaxing one or more of the specified parameters, like the heat Fa ⫽ fin analogy number
exchanger type, U, A, inlet temperatures, etc., but is beyond the h ⫽ heat transfer coefficient
scope of the present work. k ⫽ thermal conductivity

1274 / Vol. 129, SEPTEMBER 2007 Transactions of the ASME

Downloaded 21 Dec 2009 to 129.5.16.227. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
L ⫽ length
LMTD ⫽ log-mean temperature difference; LMTD= 共共T1
− t2兲 − 共T2 − t1兲兲 / ln共共T1 − t2兲兲 / 共T2 − t1兲兲
NTU
冑1 + Cr2
2

= tanh−1 ␩NTU
冑1 + Cr2
2

冉 冊
NTU ⫽ number of transfer units NTU= UA / Cmin
P ⫽ pressure of hot fluid 冑1 + 0 . 9712
tanh−1 0.8832
p ⫽ pressure of cold fluid 2
P ⫽ P = 共t2 − t1兲 / 共T1 − t1兲 NTU = = 1.030
冑1 + 0 . 9712
p̄ ⫽ circumference
q ⫽ rate of heat transfer 2
qopt ⫽ optimum rate of heat transfer; q = UA共T̄ − t̄兲
opt
R ⫽ R = 共T1 − T2兲 / 共t2 − t1兲 0.8832
␩= = 0.857
1.030
Ṡgen ⫽ rate of entropy production
T ⫽ hot fluid temperature
t ⫽ cold fluid temperature CminNTU 11,617 ⫻ 1.030
A= = = 33.71 m2
T̄ U 355
⫽ average temperature of the hot fluid T̄ = 共T1
+ T 2兲 / 2 The area for the shell and tube heat exchanger calculated here
t̄ ⫽ average temperature of the cold fluid t̄ = 共t1 matches the value given in the solutions manual for Ref. 关5兴 by
+ t 2兲 / 2 using the F correction factor.
Example 2. Water at a rate of 10,000 kg/ hr and 16° C with
To ⫽ temperature of the hot fluid in the ideal heat
exchanger specific heat of 4182 J / kg K is used to cool oil at 160° C in a shell
and tube heat exchanger similar to Example 1, having an overall
to ⫽ temperature of the cold fluid in the ideal heat
heat transfer coefficient of 355 W / m2 K and an area of 33.71 m2.
exchanger
If Ch = 11,970 W / K, determine the rate of heat transfer.
U ⫽ overall heat transfer coefficient, W / m2 K
This is the reverse problem, and an example of a heat ex-
␩ ⫽ heat exchanger efficiency
changer rating problem, typically solved using the ␧-NTU ap-
␧ ⫽ heat exchanger effectiveness ␧ = q / Cmin共T1 − t1兲
proach. Here the problem is solved using the concept of heat
␴ ⫽ nondimensional entropy generation rate ␴

exchanger efficiency.
= Ṡgen Cmin
冑1 + Cr2 冑1 + 0 . 9712
Subscripts and Superscripts Fa = NTU = 1.030 = 0.718
1 ⫽ inlet 2 2
2 ⫽ outlet
*
⫽ nondimensional tanh共Fa兲
␩= = 0.857
共Fa兲
Appendix
Example 1. Water at a rate of 10,000 kg/ hr is used to cool oil
共T1 − t1兲 160 − 16

冉 冊 冉 冊
from 160° C to 94° C on the shell side of a single shell and four- T̄ − t̄ = =
tube paths heat exchanger. Water having a specific heat of 1 + Cr 1 + 0.971
1 + NTU ␩ 1 + 1.030 ⫻ 0.857
4182 J / kg K enters the tubes at 16° C and exits at 84° C. If the 2 2
overall heat transfer coefficient is 355 W / m2 K, determine the
heat exchanger area. = 77 K
This example is based on problem 11.44 of Ref. 关5兴 and an
example of a sizing problem. Using the concept of heat exchanger q = UA␩共T̄ − t̄兲 = 355 ⫻ 33.71 ⫻ 0.858 ⫻ 77
efficiency, the solution is found as follows:
= 7.90 ⫻ 105 W
10,000
Cc = 4182 = 11,617 W/K,
3600

q = Cc共t2 − t1兲 = 11,617共84 − 16兲 = 7.90 ⫻ 105 W References


关1兴 Fakheri, A., 2003, “Arithmetic Mean Temperature Difference and the Concept
q 7.90 ⫻ 105 of Heat Exchanger Efficiency,” Proceedings of the 2003 ASME Summer Heat
Ch = = = 11,970 W/K ° C Transfer Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, July 21–23, Paper No. HT2003-
T1 − T2 160 − 94 47360.
关2兴 Fakheri, A., 2003, “The Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger Efficiency and its
Relation to Effectiveness,” Proceedings of the 2003 American Society of Me-
q = UA␩共T̄ − t̄兲 = CminNTU ␩共T̄ − t̄兲 chanical Engineers (ASME) International Mechanical Engineering Congress
and Exposition (IMECE), Washington, D.C., November 16–21.
q 7.90 ⫻ 105 关3兴 Fakheri, A., 2003, “An Alternative Approach for Determining Log Mean Tem-
NTU ␩ = = = 0.8832 perature Difference Correction Factor and Number of Shells in Shell and Tube
Cmin共T̄ − t̄兲 11,617共77兲 Heat Exchangers,” J. Enhanced Heat Transfer, 10共4兲, pp. 407–420.
关4兴 Fakheri, A., 2006, “Thermal Efficiency of the Cross Flow Heat Exchangers,”
Proceedings of the 2006 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
tanh共Fa兲
␩= International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE),
共Fa兲 Chicago, IL, November 5–10.
关5兴 Incropera, F. P., and DeWitt, D., 2002, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Trans-

tanh NTU 冉 冑1 + Cr2


2
冊 fer, 4th ed., Wiley, New York.
关6兴 McClintock, F. A., 1951, “The Design of Heat Exchangers for Minimum Irre-
versibility,” Presented at the ASME Annual Meeting, Paper No. 51-A-108.

冉 冊
␩= 关7兴 Bejan, A., 1977, “Concept of Irreversibility in Heat Exchanger Design: Coun-
冑1 + Cr2 terflow Heat Exchangers for Gas-to-Gas Applications,” ASME J. Heat Trans-
NTU fer, 99共3兲, pp. 374–380.
2 关8兴 Aceves-Saborio, S., Ranasinghe, J., and Reistad, G. M., 1989, “Extension to

Journal of Heat Transfer SEPTEMBER 2007, Vol. 129 / 1275

Downloaded 21 Dec 2009 to 129.5.16.227. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
the Irreversibility Minimization Analysis Applied to Heat Exchangers,” ASME ers,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 128, pp. 87–92.
J. Heat Transfer, 111共1兲, pp. 29–36. 关11兴 Bejan, A., 1982, “Second-Law Analysis in Heat Transfer and Thermal De-
关9兴 Shah, R. K., and Skiepko, T., 2004, “Entropy Generation Extrema and Their sign,” Adv. Heat Transfer, 15, pp. 1–58.
Relationship With Heat Exchanger Effectiveness—Number of Transfer Unit 关12兴 Sekulic, D. P., 1990, “The Second Law Quality of Energy Transformation in
Behavior for Complex Flow Arrangements,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 126共6兲, Heat Exchanger,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 112, pp. 295–300.
pp. 994–1002. 关13兴 Ogiso, K., 2003, “Duality of Heat Exchanger Performance in Balanced
关10兴 Mohamed, H. A., 2006, “Entropy Generation in Counter Flow Heat Exchang- Counter-Flow Systems,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 125共3兲, pp. 530–532.

1276 / Vol. 129, SEPTEMBER 2007 Transactions of the ASME

Downloaded 21 Dec 2009 to 129.5.16.227. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
View publication stats

You might also like