Transmission Line Model:: Design of Microstrip Patch Antenna For 5G Applications
Transmission Line Model:: Design of Microstrip Patch Antenna For 5G Applications
Hence, as seen from Figure, most of the electric field lines reside in the substrate and parts of
some lines in air. As a result, this transmission line cannot support pure transverse-electric-
magnetic (TEM) mode of transmission, since the phase velocities would be different in the
air and the substrate. Instead, the dominant mode of propagation would be the quasi-TEM
mode. Hence, an effective dielectric constant (𝜀𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑓 ) must be obtained in order to account for
the fringing and the wave propagation in the line. The value of 𝜀𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑓 is slightly less then 𝜀𝑟
because the fringing fields around the periphery of the patch are not confined in the dielectric
substrate but are also spread in the air as shown in Figure above. The expression for 𝜀𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑓 is
given by Balanis.
Consider Figure below, which shows a rectangular microstrip patch antenna of length L,
width W resting on a substrate of height h. The co-ordinate axis is selected such that the
length is along the x direction, width is along the y direction and the height is along the z
direction.
In order to operate in the fundamental TM10 mode, the length of the patch must be slightly
less than λ/2 where λ is the wavelength in the dielectric medium and is equal to λo/√εreff
where λo is the free space wavelength. The TM10 mode implies that the field varies one λ/2
cycle along the length, and there is no variation along the width of the patch. In the Figure
shown below, the microstrip patch antenna is represented by two slots, separated by a
transmission line of length L and open circuited at both the ends. Along the width of the
patch, the voltage is maximum and current is minimum due to the open ends. The fields at the
edges can be resolved into normal and tangential components with respect to the ground
plane.
It is seen from Figure that the normal components of the electric field at the two edges along
the width are in opposite directions and thus out of phase since the patch is λ/2 long and
hence they cancel each other in the broadside direction. The tangential components, which
are in phase, means that the resulting fields combine to give maximum radiated field normal
to the surface of the structure. Hence the edges along the width can be represented as two
radiating slots, which are 2 / λ apart and excited in phase and radiating in the half space
above the ground plane. The fringing fields along the width can be modeled as radiating slots
and electrically the patch of the microstrip antenna looks greater than its physical dimensions.
The dimensions of the patch along its length have now been extended on each end by a
distance L ∆, which is given empirically by Hammerstad.
Since the length of the patch has been extended by 3L on each side, the effective length of the
patch is now (L=λ/2 for dominant TM010 mode with no fringing).
For the dominant TM010 mode, the resonant frequency of the micro strip antenna is function
of its length . Usually it is given by
1 𝑣0
(𝑓𝑟 )010 = = (3-4)
2L√𝜀𝑟 √𝜇0 𝜀0 2𝐿 √𝜀𝑟
Where V0 is the speed of light in free space. Since (3-4) does not account for fringing, (3-5)
must be modified to include edge effects and it should be computed using
1 𝑣0
(𝑓𝑟𝑐 )010 = 2𝐿 = 2(L+2∆L)
eff √𝜀reff √𝜇0 𝜀0 √εreff √μ0 ε0
1 v
= q 2L = q 2L 0ε (3-5)
√εr √μ0 ε0 √ r
Where
(𝑓𝑟𝑐 )010
𝑞= (3-5a)
(𝑓𝑟 )010
The q factor is referred to as the fringe factor (length reduction factor). As the substrate
height increases, fringing also increases and leads to larger separations between the radiating
edges and lower resonant frequencies.
Design:
Based on the simplified formulation that has been described, a design procedure is outlined
which leads to practical designs of rectangular microstrip antennas. The procedure assumes
that the specified information includes the dielectric constant of the substrate h, the resonant
frequency (fr), and the height of the substrate h. The procedure is as follows:
Specify:
W, L
Design procedure:
1. For an efficient radiator, a practical width that leads to good radiation efficiencies
1 2 𝜗𝑜 2
W= √∈ = √∈ (3-6)
2𝑓𝑟 √𝜇0 ∈𝑜 𝑟 +1 2𝑓𝑟 𝑟 +1
2. Determine the effective dielectric constant of the microstrip antenna using (3-1).
3. Once W is found using (3-6), determine the extension of the length ΔL using (3-2).
4. The actual length of the patch can now be determined by solving (3-5) for L, or
1
L= − 2∆𝐿 (3-7)
2𝑓𝑟 √∈𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑓 √𝜇𝑜∈𝑜
Conductance
𝑊 1 ℎ 1
𝐺1 = [1 − (𝑘0 ℎ)2 ] < (3-8a)
120𝜆0 24 𝜆0 10
𝑊 ℎ 1
𝐵1 = [1 − 0.636 In(𝑘𝑜 ℎ)] < (3-8b)
120𝜆0 𝜆0 10
2𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑑
𝐺1 = (3-10)
|𝑉𝑜|2
koW 2
|Vo|2 π sin( 2 COSθ)
Prad = ∫ [ ] sin3 θdθ (3-11)
2πno 0 COSθ
1 𝐼
𝐺1 = 120𝜋 2
(3-12)
Where
2
𝑘0 𝑊
𝜋 sin( 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜃)
2
𝐼1 = ∫ [ ] 𝑠𝑖𝑛3 𝜃 𝑑𝜃
0 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜃
sin(𝑋)
= −2 + cos(𝑋) + 𝑋𝑆𝑖 (𝑋) + (3-12a)
𝑋
X=𝐾0 𝑊 (3-12b)
Asymptotic values of (3-12) and (3-12a) are
1 𝑊 2
( ) 𝑊 ≪ 𝜆0
90 𝜆 0
𝐺1 = { (3-13)
1 𝑊
( ) 𝑊 ≫ 𝜆0
120 𝜆 0
The values of (3-13) for W ≫ 𝜆0 are identical to those given by (3-8a) for h≪ 𝜆0 . A plot of G
as a function of W/𝜆0 is shown in Figure
Since the total input admittance is real, the resonant input impedance is also real, or
1 1
𝑍𝑖𝑛 = =𝑅𝑖𝑛 = (3-16)
𝑌𝑖𝑛 2𝐺1
The resonant input resistance, as given by (3-16), does not take into account mutual effects
between the slots. This can be accomplished by modifying
1
R in = (3-17)
2(G1 ±G12 )
where the plus (+) sign is used for modes with odd (antisymmetric) resonant voltage
distribution beneath the patch and between the slots while the minus (−) sign is used for
modes with even (symmetric) resonant voltage distribution. The mutual conductance is
defined, in terms of the far-zone fields
1
𝐺12 = 𝑅𝑒 ∫ ∫ 𝐸1 × 𝐻2∗ . 𝑑𝑠 (3-18)
|𝑉0 |2
where E1 is the electric field radiated by slot #1, H2 is the magnetic field radiated by slot #2,
V0 is the voltage across the slot, and the integration is performed over a sphere of large
radius. It canbe shown that G12 canbe calculated
𝑘0 𝑊 2
1 𝜋 sin( 2 cos𝜃)
𝐺12 = ∫ [ ] J0 (𝑘0 𝐿 sin𝜃)sin3 𝜃 𝑑𝜃 (3-18a)
120𝜋 2 0 cos𝜃
where J0 is the Bessel function of the first kind of order zero. For typical microstrip antennas,
the mutual conductance obtained using (3-18a) is small compared to the self conductance G1
of (3-8a) or (3-12).
As shown by (3-8a) and (3-17), the input resistance is not strongly dependent upon the
substrate height h. In fact for very small values of h, such that k0h _ 1, the input resistance is
not dependent on h. Modal-expansion analysis also reveals that the input resistance is not
strongly influenced by the substrate height h. It is apparent from (3-8a) and (3-17) that the
resonant input resistance can be decreased by increasing the width W of the patch. This is
acceptable as long as the ratio of W/L does not exceed 2 because the aperture efficiency of a
single patch begins to drop, as W/L increases beyond 2.
The resonant input resistance, as calculated by, is referenced at slot #1. However, it has been
shown that the resonant input resistance can be changed by using an inset feed, recessed a
distance y0 from slot #1, as shown in Figure This technique can be used effectively to match
the patch antenna using a microstrip-line feed whose characteristic impedance is given by
60 8ℎ 𝑊0
𝑙𝑛[ + ],
𝑊0 4ℎ
√𝜖𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑓
120𝜋 𝑊0 𝑊0
𝑍𝑐 = ≤ 1; >1 (3-19a,b)
𝑊 𝑊 ℎ ℎ
√𝜖𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑓 [ 0 +1.393+0.667𝑙𝑛( 0 +1.444)],
ℎ ℎ
{
where W0 is the width of the microstrip line, as shown in Figure. Using modal expansion
analysis, the input resistance for the inset feed is given approximately by
1 𝜋 𝐺12 +𝐵12 𝜋 𝐵 2𝜋
𝑅𝑖𝑛 (𝑦 = 𝑦0 ) = 2(𝐺 [ 𝑐𝑜𝑠 2 ( 𝐿 𝑦0 ) + 𝑌𝑐2
𝑠𝑖𝑛2 ( 𝐿 𝑦0 ) − 𝑌1 𝑠𝑖𝑛 ( 𝐿 𝑦0 )] (3-20)
1 ±𝐺12 ) 𝑐
where Yc = 1/Zc. Since for most typical microstrips G1/Yc _ 1 an dB1/Yc _ 1, (3-20) reduces
to
1 𝜋
𝑅𝑖𝑛 (𝑦 = 𝑦0 ) = 2(𝐺 𝑐𝑜𝑠 2 (𝐿 𝑦0 )
1 ±𝐺12 )
𝜋
= 𝑅𝑖𝑛 (𝑦 = 0) 𝑐𝑜𝑠 2 ( 𝐿 𝑦0 ) (3-20a)
The values obtained using (3-20) agree fairly well with experimental data. However, the inset
feed introduces a physical notch, which in turn introduces a junction capacitance. The
physical notch and its corresponding junction capacitance influence slightly the resonance
frequency, which typically may vary by about 1%. It is apparent from (3-20a) and Figure
that the maximum value occurs at the edge of the slot (𝑦0 = 0) where the voltage is maximum
and the current is minimum; typical values are in the 150–300 ohms. The minimum value
(zero) occurs at the center of the patch (𝑦0 = L/2) where the voltage is zero and the current is
maximum. As the inset feed point moves from the edge toward the center of the patch the
resonant input impedance decreases monotonically and reaches zero at the center. When the
value of the inset feed point approaches the center of the patch (𝑦0 = L/2), the cos2(π𝑦0 /L)
function varies very rapidly; therefore the input resistance also changes rapidly with the
position of the feed point. To maintain very accurate values, a close tolerance must be
preserved.