2 Transformers PDF
2 Transformers PDF
2 Transformers PDF
(Transformers)
by
Material used for core should be highly permeable (µr > 1000)
High permeability will give low reluctance for the path of the flux
Flux line will confine to the iron core
Silicon steel in the form of thin laminations is used
Over the years, for better magnetic properties, Hot rolled
non-oriented to Hot rolled grain oriented steel is used
Later better lamination in Cold Rolled Grain Oriented Steel
(CRGOS) became available
The thickness of the laminations progressively got reduced from over
0.5 mm to the present 0.25 mm per lamination
Laminations are coated with a thin layer of insulating varnish, oxide
or phosphate
Magnetic material is required to have
high permeability µ
high saturation flux density
small area under the B-H loop-to permit high flux density of
operation with low magnetizing current and low hysteresis loss
Dr. Mithun Mondal Transformers 9/112
Core Construction (contd.)
The resistivity of the iron sheet itself is required to be high to reduce
the eddy current losses
The eddy current itself is highly reduced by making the laminations
very thin
If the lamination is made too thin then the production cost of steel
laminations increases
For very small transformers (few VA to few KVA) hot rolled silicon
steel laminations in the form of E&I, C&I or O are used and core
cross-section should be square or rectangle
Disc coils:
Consist of flat conductors wound in a spiral form at the same place
spiralling outwards.
Alternate discs are made to spiral from outside towards the center.
Sectional discs or continuous discs may be used.
Excellent thermal properties and the behavior of the winding is
highly predictable.
Winding of a continuous disc winding needs specialized skills.
Sandwich coils:
They permit easy control over the short circuit impedance of the
transformer.
By bringing HV and LV coils close on the same magnetic axis the
leakage is reduced and the mutual flux is increased.
By increasing the number of sandwiched coils the reactance can be
substantially reduced.
Let,
N1 = No. of turns in primary
N2 = No. of turns in secondary
Φm = Bm × A Maximum flux in core in webers
f= Frequency of a.c. input in Hz
E2 N2
= =K
E1 N1
Step-Up Transformer:
N2 > N1 ⇒ K > 1
Step-Down Transformer:
N2 < N1 ⇒ K < 1
For an ideal transformer, input VA = output VA
V1 I1 = V2 I2
I2 V1 1
⇒ = =
I1 V2 K
Currents is in inverse proportional of the voltage transformation ratio
W0 = V1 I0 cos(Φ0 )
Iw = I0 cos(Φ0 )
Im = I0 sin(Φ0 ) q
I0 = Iw2 + Im2
Dr. Mithun Mondal Transformers 35/112
Case-1: Transformer on no-load (contd.)
Important points:
I0 is very small about 1% of the full-load primary current
As I0 is very small, no-load primary Cu loss is negligibly small,
means no-load primary input is practically equal to the iron loss in
the transformer
As core loss is responsible for the shift in the current vector, Φ0 is
known as the hysteresis angle of advance
Since, Core µ varies with the instantaneous value of Im , hence wave
of Im is not truly sinusoidal. Thus it should not be represented by
vector (only sinusoids are represented by vectors), but it makes no
difference
0 N2
I1 = I2 = KI2
N1
Therefore,
→
− → − → −0
I1 = I0 + I1
V2 = E2 − I2 R2
E1 = V1 − I1 R1
0
R2 → R2 /K 2
0
R1 = K 2 R1
0
R01 = R1 + R2 = R1 + R2 /K 2
0
R02 = R2 + R1 = R2 + K 2 R1
X1 = eL1 /I1
X2 = eL2 /I2
q
Z01 = R201 + X01
2
q
Z02 = R202 + X02
2
At no load:
V1 ≈ E1
E2 = KE1 = KV1
E2 =0 V2
At load:
where
I2 R02 I1 R01
vr = × 100 = × 100 = percentage resistive drop
0 V2 V1
I2 X02 I1 X01
vx = × 100 = × 100 = percentage reactive drop
0 V2 V1
Carry out two experiments using two different f but with same Bm to
evaluate constants P and Q
Dr. Mithun Mondal Transformers 59/112
Short Circuit Test
Vsc Wsc
Zsc = ⇒ RT = 2
Isc Isc
q
⇒XT = Zsc2 − R2
T
Iron loss = Pi
Copper loss = x2 Pc
⇒ Wa = (1 − K) × W0
∴ Saving = W0 − Wa = W0 − (1 − K) W0 = KW0
Pind = Input × (1 − K)
Pcond = Input × K
Normally Sbase and Vbase are known from name plate details. Other
base values can be derived from them
V(volt)
Vp.u =
Vbase (volt)
I (Amps) I
Ip.u = =
Ibase (Amps) Sbase
Vbase
Z (ohm) Ibase Sbase
Zp.u = = Z(ohm) ∗ = Z(ohm) ∗ 2
Zbase (ohm) Vbase Vbase
where
IA + IB = IL (1)
V1
VL = − IA ZA (2)
a1
V1 V1
VL = − IB ZB = − (IL − IA ) ZB (3)
a2 a2
ZB IL V1 (a2 − a1 )
IA = +
ZA + ZB a1 a2 (ZA + ZB )
ZA IL V1 (a2 − a1 )
IB = +
ZA + ZB a1 a2 (ZA + ZB )
IA ZA = IB ZB
This causes escape of magnetic flux to the metal enclosure from the
core and raises the heating of the metallic parts
In some cases heating results in fire
Cost of repair is more for 3-phase transformer
To restore the service, spare unit cost is more as compared to one
single transformer
Under self cooling the capacity is reduced
Total
√ KVA√that√can be supplied to the load:
3VL IL = 3( 3100) = 30KVA
Dr. Mithun Mondal Transformers 93/112
STAR-STAR CONNECTIONS (contd.)
Generally used for small, high-voltage transformers. Because of star
connection,
√ number of required turns/phase is reduced (as
Vp = 1/ 3VL ). Thus, the amount of insulation required is also
reduced.
This connection can be used only if the connected load is balanced
Problems Associated With Star-Star Connection
The Y-Y connection has two very serious problems. They are
Not satisfactory for the unbalance load in the absence of a neutral
connection. If the neutral is not provided, then the phase voltages
become severely unbalance when the load is unbalanced.
The Y-Y connection contains a third harmonics, and in balanced
conditions, these harmonics are equal in magnitude and phase with
the magnetising current. Their sum at the neutral of star connection
is not zero, and hence it will distort the flux wave which will produce
a voltage having a harmonics in each of the transformers
The unbalanced and third harmonics problems of Y-Y connection can be
solved by using the solid ground of neutral and by providing tertiary
windings.
Dr. Mithun Mondal Transformers 94/112
STAR-DELTA CONNECTIONS
Total
√ KVA√that can
√ be supplied to the load:
3VL IL = 3100( 3100) = 30KVA
This connection is mainly used in step down transformer at the
substation end of the transmission line
EDC and EDB differ by 180◦ because both coils are on the same
magnetic circuit and are connected in opposition
Each side of the equilateral triangle represents 100 V
√
Voltage EDA is ( 3/2) × 100 = 86.6 V and lags behind the voltage
across the main by 90◦
The same relation holds good in the secondary winding so that abc
is a symmetrical 3-phase system
Dr. Mithun Mondal Transformers 106/112
With reference to secondary voltage triangle for UPF load Idb lags
Edb by 30◦ and Idc leads Edc by 30◦
In other words, the teaser and each half of the main transformer, all
operates at different power factors
Obviously, the full rating of the transformers is not being utilized
The teaser transformer operates at only 0.866 of its rated voltage
The main transformer coils operate at cos 30◦ = 0.866 power factor,
which is equivalent to the main transformers coils working at 86.6%
of their KVA rating
Hence, the capacity to rating ratio in a T-T connection is 86.6%–the
same as in V-V connection if two identical units are used