Rpms Tools Marias Version
Rpms Tools Marias Version
Rpms Tools Marias Version
(Proficient Teachers)
JOB SUMMARY
QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications
Education Bachelor of
Elementary/Secondary/Early
Childhood Education or
Bachelor's degree plus 18
Experience None
units inRequired
Education
Eligibility RA 1080
Trainings None Required
B. Preferred Qualifications
Education BSE/BSEEd/College
Graduate with Education
Experience units (18-21), at least 18 MA
units
Eligibility PBET/LET Passer
Trainings In-service training
2. Facilitates learning using appropriate and innovative teaching strategies and classroom management practices.
Page 1 of 1
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION TOOL (COT) - RPMS
OBSERVER:
TEACHER
OBSERVED: DATE:
Check the strategies used by the teacher in managing the learner during the classroom
observation.
Providing motivation
_______________________________________________
Signature over Printed Name of the Observer
RPMS TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III (Proficient Teachers)
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Means of Verification
KRA's OBJECTIVES Very
(MOV) QET Outstanding
Satisfactory
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
1. CONTENT 1. Applied knowledge of 1. Classroom observation tool Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge No
content within and (COT) rating sheet and/or inter- of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its acceptable
KNOWLEDGE integration within integration within integration within integration within evidence
across curricuoum observer agreement form about
AND and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject was shown
teaching areas. knowledge of content within and areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
PEDAGOGY across subject areas MOV1 with a rating MOV1 with a rating MOV1 with a rating MOV1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
Quality
3. Instructional materials highlighting Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 No
mastery of content and its leassons using MOV leassons using MOV leassons using MOV the given MOV acceptable
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by evidence
integration in other subject areas
any 1of the other any 1of the other any 1of the other was shown
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Efficiency
4. Performance tasks/test materials
highlighting integration of content
knowledge within and across
subject areas
Quality
3. Instructional materials highlighting Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted 1 No
learner-centered strategies that learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered acceptable
lessons as shown in lessons as shown in lessons as shown in lesson as evidently evidence
promote literacy and/or numeracy
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and shown in any 1 of was shown
skills supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 the given MOV
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV
given given given
Efficiency
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) used in teaching
5. Results of assessment used in
teaching
Quality
3. Instructional materials highlighting Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted 1 lesson No
different teaching strategies that lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by acceptable
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV any 1 of the given evidence
develop critical and creative
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by MOV was shown
thinking, and/or other HOTS any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Efficiency
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) used in demonstration
teaching
5. Results of assessment used in
teaching
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations) Timeliness
RPMS TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III (Proficient Teachers)
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Means of Verification
KRA's OBJECTIVES Very
(MOV) QET Outstanding
Satisfactory
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
2. LEARNING 4. Managed classroom 1. Classroom observation tool Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No
structure to engage (COT) rating sheet and/or inter- management management management management acceptable
ENVIRONMENT strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
learners, individually observer agreement form about
AND DIVERSITY engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in was shown
or in groups, in managing classroom structure activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
OF LEARNERS meaningful that engages learners in various shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
explanation, activities with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
discovery and hands-
on activities within a
range of physical
learning Quality
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
environments.
highlighting various classroom
management strategies that
engage learners in activities/tasks
in different physical learning
environments
3. Others (Please specify and Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No
provide annotations) lessons supported supported by MOV 1 supported by MOV 1 supported by any of acceptable
by MOV 1 and any 1 and any 1 of the and any 1 of the the acceptable evidence
of the other other acceptable other acceptable MOV was shown
Efficiency acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
2. LEARNING 5. Managed learner Classroom observation tool Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No
behavior (COT) rating sheet and/or inter- management management management management acceptable
ENVIRONMENT strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner evidence
constructively by observer agreement form about
AND DIVERSITY behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that was shown
applying positive and teacher management of learner promote positive promote positive promote positive promote positive
OF LEARNERS non-violent discipline behavior using the following and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
to ensure learning- strategies: discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown
focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted
environments. 1. Providing motivation with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
Quality
2. Praising the learners/Giving
positive feedback
4. Ensuring learner's active Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 of No
participation of the given of the given of the given the given strategies acceptable
strategies as strategies as strategies as as observed in only evidence
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2 1 lesson was shown
5. Allowing learners to express their 4 lessons lessons lessons
ideas/opinions
Efficiency
6. Giving equal opportunities to
learners
Timeliness
RPMS TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III (Proficient Teachers)
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Means of Verification
KRA's OBJECTIVES Very
(MOV) QET Outstanding
Satisfactory
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
3. CURRICULUM 7. Planned, managed 1. Classroom observation tool Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No
and implemented (COT) rating sheet and/or inter- implemented implemented implemented implemented acceptable
AND PLANNING developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence
developmentally observer agreement form about
sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced was shown
sequenced teaching using developmentally sequenced and learning and learning and learning teaching and
and learning teaching and learning process process as shown in process as shown in process as shown in learning process as
processes to meet MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating shown in MOV 1
curriculum of 7 of 6 of 5 with a rating of 4
requirements and
varied teaching
contents.
Quality
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
developed highlighting
developmetally sequenced
instruction that meet curriculum
goals and varied teaching
contexts
Efficiency
Timeliness
Timeliness
3. CURRICULUM 9. Selected, developed, 1. Classroom observation tool Developed and used 6Developed and 6Developed and 6Developed and No
organized, and used (COT) rating sheet and/or inter- varied teaching and used varied used varied used varied acceptable
AND PLANNING learning resources teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence
appropriate teaching observer agreement form about
including ICT, to learning resources learning resources learning resources was shown
and learning using appropriate teaching and address learning including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
resources, including learning resources, including ICT goals as shown in address learning address learning address learning
ICT, to address MOV 1 with a rating goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in
learning goals. of 7 MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 8 of 5 of 4
Quality
Examples: Activity sheets/tasks
sheets/work sheets, powerpoint
presentations, video clips,
module, SIMs-Strategic
Intervention Matertials, Other
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs with Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No
apprropriate instructional varied teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and acceptable
learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resource evidence
materials appended
including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as was shown
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV
3. Others (Please specify and of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV MOV
provide annotations) Efficiency
RPMS TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III (Proficient Teachers)
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Means of Verification
KRA's OBJECTIVES Very
(MOV) QET Outstanding
Satisfactory
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
Timeliness
4. ASSESMENT 10. Designed, selected, 1. Classroom observation tool Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No
organized and used (COT) rating sheet and/or inter- organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used acceptable
AND diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, evidence
diagnostic, formative observer agreement form about
REPORTING and summative and summative and summative formative and was shown
and summative using diagnostic, formative and assessment assessment assessment summative
assessment summative assessment startegies strategies consistent strategies consistent strategies consistent assessment
strategies consistent with curriculum with curriculum with curriculum strategies
with curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as consistent with
requirements. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 curriculum
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 requirements as
shown in MOV 1
2. Prepared lesson plans/modified with a rating of 4
DLLs highlighting appropriate use
of formative assessment
Quality
strategies
4. Develop summative tests: (a) with Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No
TOS reviewed by superior; (b) varied assessment assessment tools as assessment tools as assessment tool as acceptable
tools as evidently evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidence
with sample accomplished
shown in any 1 of any 1 of the any 1 of the any of the was shown
questionaire/answer sheets the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
5. Develop performance tasks: (a)
with rubrics reviewed by superior; Efficiency
(b) with sample accomplished
rubrics
11. Monitored and 1. Compilation of learner's written Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No
evaluated learner work with summary of results and monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated acceptable
evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress evidence
progress and with signature of parents
progress and progress and progress and and achievement was shown
achievement using achievement using achievement using achievement using using learner
learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as
data. data as shown in data as shown in data as shown in shown in MOV
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted submitted
Quality
2. Formative/summative
assessment tools with TOS and
frequency of errors with identified
least mastered skills
5. Others (Please specify and Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No
provide annotations) were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in acceptable
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter evidence
Timeliness was shown
12. Communicated 1. At least 3 samples of corrected Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed No
promptly and clearly test papers of the same 3 showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt and prompt and clear acceptable
clear communication communication of clear communication communication of evidence
the learner's needs, learners in the same learning
of the learner's the learner's needs, of the learner's the learner's needs, was shown
progress and area with parents' or guardians' needs, progress and progress and needs, progress and progress and
achievement to key signature and date of receipt achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key
stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
including parents/ including parents/ including parents/ including parents/ including parents/
guardians guardians as shown guardians as shown guardians as shown guardians as shown
in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV
submitted submitted submitted submitted
Quality
2. Minutes of PTA meetings or
Parent-Teacher conferences in all
quarters with proof of
parents'/guardians' attendance
3. Report cards with parent's or
guardian's signature in all
quarters supported by minutes of
meeting
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Means of Verification
KRA's OBJECTIVES Very
(MOV) QET Outstanding
Satisfactory
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
6. Other documents showing learner Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No
needs, progress and achievement were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in acceptable
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter evidence
submitted to other stakeholders
Timeliness was shown
5. PLUS FACTOR 13. Performed various 1. Certificate of Recognition or Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No
related Participation performed various performed various performed various various related acceptable
related related related works/activities that evidence
works/activities that
2. Certificate of Training works/activities that works/activities that works/activities that contribute to the was shown
contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the teaching-learning
teaching-learning teaching-learning teaching-learning teaching-learning process as shown
process 3. Certificate of Speakership process as shown in process as shown in process as shown in in the MOV
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted submitted
4. Committee involvement
Quality
5. Advisorship of Co-curricular
activities
9. Mentoring pre-service/in-service
teachers
10. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations) Timeliness
Name of Employee: MARY GRACE F. MIGUEL
REMARK
KRA's OBJECTIVES Acceptable MOVs Submitted MOVs
VALID
1. CONTENT 1. Applied knowledge of 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet 4 COT with average computation of grade in
KNOWLEDGE AND content within and and/or inter-observer agreement form about the 4 observations indicated in indicator 1
PEDAGOGY across curriculum knowledge of content within and across subject
teaching areas. areas
2. Used a range of 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet 4 COT with average computation of grade in
teaching strategies and/or inter-observer agreement form about the 4 observations indicated in indicator 2
that enhance learner teaching strategies that enhance learner
achievement in achievement in literacy and numeracy skills
literacy and
numeracy skills.
3. Applied a range of 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet 4 COT with average computation of grade in
teaching strategies to and/or inter-observer agreement form about the 4 observations indicated in indicator 3
develop critical and teaching strategies to develop critical and
creative thinkling, as creative thinking, as well as other higher-order
well as other higher- thinking skills
order thinking skills.
2. LEARNING 4. Managed classroom 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet 4 COT with average computation of grade in
ENVIRONMENT structure to engage and/or inter-observer agreement form about the 4 observations indicated in indicator 4
AND DIVERSITY learners, individually managing classroom structure that engages
OF LEARNERS or in groups, in learners in various activities
meaningful
explanation,
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting various 4 modified DLLs developed highlighting
discovery and hands-
classroom management strategies that engage various classroom management strategies
on activities within a
learners in activities/tasks in different physical that engage learners in activities/tasks in
range of physical
learning environments different physical learning environments
learning
environments.
5. Managed learner Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet 4 COT with average computation of grade in
behavior and/or inter-observer agreement form about the 4 observations indicated in indicator 5
constructively by teacher management of learner behavior using
applying positive and the following strategies:
non-violent discipline
to ensure learning-
1. Providing motivation
focused
environments.
2. Praising the learners/Giving positive feedback
6. Used differentiated, 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet 2 COT with average computation of grade in
developmentally and/or inter-observer agreement form about the 2 observations indicated in indicator 6
appropriate learning using differentiated, developmentally appropriate
experiencce to learning experiences
address learner's
gender, needs,
strengths, interests
and experiences. 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed 2 modified DLLs witn atleast 4 differentiated
highlighting differentiation in content, product, teaching strategies
process, learning environment or others
according to learners' gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences
3. CURRICULUM AND 7. Planned, managed 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet 4 COT with average computation of grade in
PLANNING and implemented and/or inter-observer agreement form about the 4 observations indicated in indicator 7
developmentally using developmentally sequenced teaching and
sequenced teaching learning process
and learning
processes to meet
curriculumrequireme
nts and varied 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed 4 modified DLLs developed highlighting
teaching contents. highlighting developmetally sequenced developmetally sequenced instruction that
instruction that meet curriculum goals and varied meet curriculum goals
teaching contexts
9. Selected, developed, 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet 1 COT with average computation of grade in
organized, and used and/or inter-observer agreement form about the 4 observations indicated in indicator 8
appropriate teaching using appropriate teaching and learning
and learning resources, including ICT
resources, including
ICT, to address
Examples: Activity sheets/tasks sheets/work Examples: Activity sheets/tasks sheets/work
learning goals.
sheets, powerpoint presentations, video clips, sheets, powerpoint presentations, video clips,
module, SIMs-Strategic Intervention Matertials, module, SIMs-Strategic Intervention
Other Matertials, Other
4. ASSESMENT AND 10. Designed, selected, 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet 1 COT with average computation of grade in
REPORTING organized and used and/or inter-observer agreement form about the 4 observations indicated in indicator 9
diagnostic, formative using diagnostic, formative and summative
and summative assessment startegies
assessment
strategies consistent
2. Prepared lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting 4 modified DLLs developed highlighting
with curriculum
appropriate use of formative assessment appropriate use of formative assessment
requirements.
strategies strategies
3. Develop diagnostic tests: (a) with TOS reviewed 4 developed diagnostic tests: (a) with TOS
by superior; (b) with sample accomplished reviewed by superior; (b) with sample
questionaire/answer sheets accomplished questionaire/answer sheets
4. Develop summative tests: (a) with TOS reviewed 4 develop summative tests: (a) with TOS
by superior; (b) with sample accomplished reviewed by superior; (b) with sample
questionaire/answer sheets accomplished questionaire/answer sheets
5. Develop performance tasks: (a) with rubrics 4 develop performance tasks: (a) with rubrics
reviewed by superior; (b) with sample reviewed by superior; (b) with sample
accomplished rubrics accomplished rubrics
4. ASSESMENT AND 11. Monitored and 1. Compilation of learner's written work with Compilation of learner's written work with
REPORTING evaluated learner summary of results and with signature of parents summary of results and with signature of
progress and parents 1 student per section
achievement using
learner attainment
data.
2. Formative/summative assessment tools with TOS 4 Formative/summative assessment tools with
and frequency of errors with identified least TOS and frequency of errors with identified
mastered skills (based on rank of skills) least mastered skills (based on rank of skills)
4. Lesson plans/modified DLLs showing index of 4 Lesson plans/modified DLLs showing index
mastery of mastery reviewed by the coordinator
12. Communicated 1. At least 3 samples of corrected test papers of the At least 3 samples per section of corrected
promptly and clearly same 3 learners in the same learning area with test papers of the same 3 learners innthe
the learner's needs, parents' or guardians' signature and date of same learning area with parents' or guardians'
progress and receipt signature and date of receipt per quarter
achievement to key
stakeholders,
including parents/
guardians 2. Minutes of PTA meetings or Parent-Teacher Minutes of PTA meetings or Parent-Teacher
conferences in all quarters with proof of conferences in all quarters with proof of
parents'/guardians' attendance parents'/guardians' attendance
3. Report cards with parent's or guardian's signature Sample report cards with parent's or
in all quarters supported by minutes of meeting guardian's signature (duplicate copy) in all
quarters supported by minutes of meeting
5. Anecdotal record showing entries per quarter Anecdotal record showing entries per quarter
5. PLUS FACTOR 13. Performed various 1. Certificate of Recognition or Participation Certificate of Recognition or Participation
related
works/activities that
contribute to the 2. Certificate of Training Certificate of Training
teaching-learning
process 3. Certificate of Speakership Certificate of Speakership
7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship
8. Coaching and mentoring learners in competitions Coaching and mentoring learners in
competitions
REMARKS
INVALID
ecked by: ________________________________
UBMITTED MEANS OF VERIFICATION
INDICATOR 1 INDICATOR 2
COT RATING SHEET COT RATING RPMS- POINT SCALE COT RATING SHEET COT RATING
COT Rating sheet 1 5 3 COT Rating sheet 1
COT Rating sheet 2 5 3 COT Rating sheet 2
COT Rating sheet 3 5 3 COT Rating sheet 3
COT Rating sheet 4 5 3 COT Rating sheet 4
TOTAL 5 12 TOTAL
AVERAGE 3 AVERAGE
FINAL RATING FINAL RATING
INDICATOR 3 INDICATOR 4
COT RATING SHEET COT RATING RPMS- POINT SCALE COT RATING SHEET COT RATING
COT Rating sheet 1 -2 COT Rating sheet 1
COT Rating sheet 2 -2 COT Rating sheet 2
COT Rating sheet 3 -2 COT Rating sheet 3
COT Rating sheet 4 -2 COT Rating sheet 4
TOTAL -8 TOTAL
AVERAGE -2 AVERAGE
FINAL RATING FINAL RATING
INDICATOR 5 INDICATOR 6
COT RATING SHEET COT RATING RPMS- POINT SCALE COT RATING SHEET COT RATING
COT Rating sheet 1 -2 COT Rating sheet 1
COT Rating sheet 2 -2 COT Rating sheet 2
COT Rating sheet 3 -2 COT Rating sheet 3
COT Rating sheet 4 -2 COT Rating sheet 4
TOTAL -8 TOTAL
AVERAGE -2 AVERAGE
FINAL RATING FINAL RATING
INDICATOR 7 INDICATOR 8
COT RATING SHEET COT RATING RPMS- POINT SCALE COT RATING SHEET COT RATING
COT Rating sheet 1 -2 COT Rating sheet 1
COT Rating sheet 2 -2 COT Rating sheet 2
COT Rating sheet 3 -2 COT Rating sheet 3
COT Rating sheet 4 -2 COT Rating sheet 4
TOTAL -8 TOTAL
AVERAGE -2 AVERAGE
FINAL RATING FINAL RATING
INDICATOR 9
RANGE
4.500-5.000
3.500-4.499
2.500-3.499
1.500-2.499
below 1.499
INDICATOR 2
INDICATOR 4
INDICATOR 6
-2
-4
-2
INDICATOR 8
-2
-2
-2
Name: MARY GRACE F. MIG Name of Rater: ANAGINE E. SINDAC
1 1 0.5 0 0.5
2 1 0.5 0 0.5
3 1 0.5 0 0.5
4 1 0.5 0 0.5
FINAL
OBJECTIVE NO OF TIMES OBSERVED WITH ATLEAST 4 GIVEN STRATEGIES TOTAL RATING RATING
5 1 1
6
1 0.5 0 0.5
Powerpoint
NO. OF SUBMITTED presentations, video FINAL
OBJECTIVE LESSON PLANS clips, module, TOTAL RATING RATING
9 1 0.5 0 0.5
FINAL
OBJECTIVE NO. OF SUBMITTED VARIED ASSESSMENT TOOL TOTAL RATING RATING
10 1 1
OBJECTIVE EFFICIENCY TOTAL RATING FINAL RATING
NO. OF SUBMITTED
COMPILATIION OF
LEARNERS WORK WITH
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
AND WITH SIGNATURE OF
PARENTS
NO. OF SUBMITTED
FORMATIVE /SUMMATIVE
ASSESSMENT TOOLS
WITH TOS AND
FREQUENCY OF ERRORS
WITH IDENTIFIED LEAST
MASTERED SKILLS (BASED
ON RANK OF SKILLS)
11 1 1
0 1
1
1.75
12
Sample report cards with
parent's or guardian's
signature (duplicate copy) 1
in all quarters supported
by minutes of meeting
Communication with
parents/guardians using
various modalities/
Anecdotal record showing
entries per quarter
FINAL
FOR ADVISERS SCORE WEIGHT TOTAL RATING RATING
4 10% 0.4
LIASON
EMIS 3 20% 0.6
MEA 4 20% 0.8
TEACHER-IN-CHARGE
(Other 3 20% 0.6
COORDINATORSHIP)
TOTAL 18 100% 3.6
SUBJECT AREA
COORDINATOR
GRADE LEVEL 5 35% 1.75
COORDINATOR 5 30% 1.5
LIASON 5 5% 0.25
EMIS 5 10% 0.5
LIS 5 5% 0.25
FINAL
GLC'S /ADVISER SCORE WEIGHT TOTAL RATING RATING
FINAL
SUBJECT TEACHER SCORE WEIGHT TOTAL RATING RATING
1. CONTENT 1. Applied knowledge of Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of content Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of No acceptable
content within and across content and its integration and its integration within and content and its integration content and its evidence was
KNOWLEDGE within and across subject across subject areas as shown within and across subject integration within and shown
curricuoum teaching
AND PEDAGOGY areas as shown in MOV1 with in MOV1 with a rating of 6 areas as shown in MOV1 across subject areas
areas. a rating of 7 with a rating of 5 as shown in MOV1
Quality with a rating of 4 0
Timeliness
2. Used a range of teaching Facilitated using different Facilitated using different Facilitated using different Facilitated using No acceptable
strategies that enhance teaching strategies that teaching strategies that teaching strategies that different teaching evidence was
promote reading, writing promote reading, writing and/or promote reading, writing strategies that shown
learner achievement in
and/or numeracy skills as numeracy skills as shown in and/or numeracy skills as promote reading,
literacy and numeracy shown in MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating of 6 shown in MOV 1 with a writing and/or
skills. of 7 rating of 5 numeracy skills as
Quality
shown in MOV 1 with
0
a rating of 4
Timeliness
3. Applied a range of Used different teaching Used different teaching Used different teaching Used different No acceptable
teaching strategies to strategies that develop critical strategies that develop critical strategies that develop teaching strategies evidence was
and creative thinking and/or and creative thinking and/or critical and creative thinking that develop critical shown
develop critical and
other HOTS as shown in other HOTS as shown in MOV and/or other HOTS as and creative thinking
creative thinkling, as well MOV 1 with a rating of 7 1 with a rating of 6 shown in MOV 1 with a and/or other HOTS as
as other higher-order rating of 5 shown in MOV 1 with
thinking skills.
Quality
a rating of 4
0
Timeliness
2. LEARNING 4. Managed classroom Used classroom management Used classroom management Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable
structure to engage strategies that engage strategies that engage learners management strategies that management evidence was
ENVIRONMENT learners in activities/tasks as in activities/tasks as shown in engage learners in strategies that engage shown
learners, individually or in
AND DIVERSITY shown in MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating of 6 activities/tasks as shown in learners in
groups, in meaningful of 7 MOV 1 with a rating of 5 activities/tasks as
OF LEARNERS explanation, discovery Quality shown in MOV 1 with 0
and hands-on activities a rating of 4
within a range of physical
learning environments.
May 2018 to April
2019
7.5% 0 0.000
Submitted at least 4 lessons Submitted 3 lessons supported Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
supported by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any 1 of the supported by MOV 1 and supported by any of evidence was
1 of the other acceptable other acceptable MOV any 1 of the other the acceptable MOV shown
Efficiency MOV acceptable MOV 0
Timeliness
2. LEARNING 5. Managed learner Applied teacher management Applied teacher management Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable
behavior constructively strategies of learner behavior strategies of learner behavior management strategies of management evidence was
ENVIRONMENT that promote positive and that promote positive and non- learner behavior that strategies of learner shown
AND DIVERSITY by applying positive and
non-violent discipline as violent discipline as shown in promote positive and non- behavior that promote
non-violent discipline to
OF LEARNERS ensure learning-focused
shown in MOV submitted with MOV submitted with a rating of violent discipline as shown positive and non-
a rating of 7 6 in MOV submitted with a violent discipline as
environments. Quality rating of 5 shown in MOV 0
submitted with a rating
of 4
May 2018 to April
2019
7.5% 2.5 0.188
Submitted at least 4 of the Submitted at least 3 of the Submitted at least 2 of the Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable
given strategies as observed given strategies as observed in given strategies as observed given strategies as evidence was
in at least 4 lessons 3 lessons in 2 lessons observed in only 1 shown
Efficiency
lesson
5
Timeliness
6. Used differentiated, Applied differentiated Applied differentiated teaching Applied differentiated Applied differentiated No acceptable
developmentally teaching strategies to strategies to address learner teaching strategies to teaching strategies to evidence shown
address learner diversity as diversity as shown in MOV 1 address learner diversity as address learner
appropriate learning
shown in MOV 1 with a rating with a rating of 6 shown in MOV 1 with a diversity as shown in
experiencce to address of 7 rating of 5 MOV 1 with a rating of
learner's gender, needs, Quality 4 0
strengths, interests and
experiences.
May 2018 to April Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
2019
7.5% differentiated teaching differentiated teaching differentiated teaching differentiated teaching evidence shown
0 0.000
strategies in at least 2 strategies in at least 2 lessons strategies in at least 2 strategy in only 1 No
leassons as evidenced by as evidenced by MOV 1 and lessons as evidenced by lesson as evidently acceptable evidence
MOV 1 and supported by any supported by any 1 of the MOV 1 and supported by shown in any 1 of the was shown
Efficiency 1 of the other acceptable other acceptable MOV any 1 of the other acceptable MOV 0
MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
3. CURRICULUM 7. Planned, managed and Planned and implemented Planned and implemented Planned and implemented Planned and No acceptable
implemented developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced implemented evidence was
AND PLANNING teaching and learning process teaching and learning process teaching and learning developmentally shown
developmentally
as shown in MOV 1 with a as shown in MOV 1 with a process as shown in MOV 1 sequenced teaching
sequenced teaching and rating of 7 rating of 6 with a rating of 5 and learning process
learning processes to Quality as shown in MOV 1 0
meet curriculum with a rating of 4
requirements and varied
teaching contexts.
May 2018 to April Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 developmentally Submitted 2 developmentally Submitted 1 No acceptable
2019
7.5% developmentally sequenced sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching and developmentally evidence was
0 0.000
teaching and learning process learning process as evidently learning process as sequenced teaching shown
as evidently shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 and evidently shown in MOV 1 and learning process
and supported by any 1 of the supported by any 1 of the and supported by any 1 of as evidently shown in
Efficiency other given MOV other given MOV the other given MOV any 1 of the given 0
MOV
Timeliness
3. CURRICULUM 8. Participated in collegial Consistently participated in Frequently participated in Occasionally participated in Rarely participated in No acceptable
discussions that use LACs/FGDs/ meetings to LACs/FGDs/ meetings to LACs/FGDs/ meetings to LACs/FGDs/ meetings evidence was
AND PLANNING discuss teacher/learner discuss teacher/learner discuss teacher/learner to discuss shown
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich instruction feedback to enrich instruction feedback to enrich teacher/learner
feedback to enrich as shown in the MOV as shown in the MOV instruction as shown in the feedback to enrich
teaching practice. submitted submitted MOV submitted instruction as shown
Quality in the MOV submitted 1
Timeliness
9. Selected, developed, Developed and used varied Developed and used varied Developed and used varied Developed and used No acceptable
organized, and used teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning varied teaching and evidence was
resources including ICT, to resources including ICT, to resources including ICT, to learning resources shown
appropriate teaching and
address learning goals as address learning goals as address learning goals as including ICT, to
learning resources, shown in MOV 1 with a rating shown in MOV 1 with a rating shown in MOV 1 with a address learning goals
including ICT, to address of 7 of 8 rating of 5 as shown in MOV 1
learning goals.
Quality
with a rating of 4
0
Timeliness
4. ASSESSMENT 10. Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, organized Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable
organized and used organized and used and used diagnostic, formative organized and used organized and used evidence was
AND REPORTING diagnostic, formative and and summative assessment diagnostic, formative and diagnostic, formative shown
diagnostic, formative and
summative assessment strategies consistent with summative assessment and summative
summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements as strategies consistent with assessment strategies
strategies consistent with curriculum requirements as shown in MOV 1 with a rating curriculum requirements as consistent with
curriculum requirements. shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 shown in MOV 1 with a curriculum
of 7 rating of 5 requirements as
Quality shown in MOV 1 with 0
a rating of 4
Timeliness
4. ASSESSMENT 11. Monitored and evaluated Consistently monitored and Frequently monitored and Occasionally monitored and Rarely monitored and No acceptable
learner progress and evaluated learner progress evaluated learner progress and evaluated learner progress evaluated learner evidence was
AND REPORTING and achievement using achievement using learner and achievement using progress and shown
achievement using
learner attainment data as attainment data as shown in learner attainment data as achievement using
learner attainment data. shown in MOV submitted MOV submitted shown in MOV submitted learner attainment
Quality data as shown in MOV 1
submitted
Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV was No acceptable
Timeliness distributed across 4 quarters distributed across 3 quarters distributed across 2 quarters completed in only 1 evidence was 1
quarter shown
12. Communicated promptly Consistently showed prompt Frequently showed prompt and Occasionally showed prompt Rarely showed prompt No acceptable
and clearly the learner's and clear communication of clear communication of the and clear communication of and clear evidence was
the learner's needs, progress learner's needs, progress and the learner's needs, communication of the shown
needs, progress and
and achievement to key achievement to key progress and achievement learner's needs,
achievement to key stakeholders, including stakeholders, including to key stakeholders, progress and
stakeholders, including parents/ guardians as shown parents/ guardians as shown including parents/ guardians achievement to key
parents/ guardians in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted as shown in the MOV stakeholders,
submitted including parents/
Quality guardians as shown in 1
the MOV submitted
Submitted a combination of at Submitted a combination of 3 Submitted a combination of Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable
least 4 of the acceptable of the acceptable MOV 2 of the acceptable MOV given MOV evidence was
Efficiency MOV shown 0
Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV was No acceptable
Timeliness distributed across 4 quarters distributed across 3 quarters distributed across 2 quarters completed in only 1 evidence was 1
quarter shown
5. PLUS FACTOR 13. Performed various related Consistently performed Frequently performed various Occasionally performed Rarely performed No acceptable
works/activities that various related related works/activities that various related various related evidence was
works/activities that contribute to the teaching- works/activities that works/activities that shown
contribute to the
contribute to the teaching- learning process as shown in contribute to the teaching- contribute to the
teaching-learning process learning process as shown in the MOV submitted learning process as shown teaching-learning
Quality the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted process as shown in 0
the MOV submitted
May 2018 to April
2019
10% 0.5 0.050
Submitted at least 4 different Submitted 3 different kinds of Submitted 2 different kinds Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable
kinds of acceptable MOV acceptable MOV of acceptable MOV acceptable MOV evidence was
Efficiency shown 1
Timeliness
3.5 - 4.499 VS
2.5 - 3.499 S
1.5 - 2.499 US
Weight
per Numerical Ratings
KRA Weight per KRA Objectives
Objecti Q E T
Objective 1 ve
7.5% 0 0
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 0 0
Objective 3 7.5% 0 0
Objective 4 7.5% 0 0
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 0 5
Objective 6 7.5% 0 0
Objective 7 7.5% 0 0
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 1 1
Objective 9 7.5% 0 0
Objective 10 7.5% 0 1
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 1 1 1
Objective 12 7.5% 1 0 1
Plus Fac 10% Objective 13 10% 0 1
Final Ratin
Adjectival Ratin
ANAGINE E. SINDAC
TEACHER-IN-CHARGE
APRIL 2019
rical Ratings
Score
Ave
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
2.500 0.188
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
1.000 0.075
0.000 0.000
0.500 0.038
1.000 0.075
0.667 0.050
0.500 0.050
Final Rating 0.475
Adjectival Rating US
4 Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency. May focus on new
5 4 Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit and
organization.
or more precise ways of meeting goals set. 5 Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilties. Demonstrates resourcefulness and the ability
to succeed with minimal resources.
5 Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve performance. Examples
may include doing something better, faster, at alower cost, more efficiently; or improving quality,
costumer satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal.
5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates; 1 - Rarely demonstrate
OVERALL
COMPETENCY
RATINGS
rfcuevas2019
PETENCIES
3.83
3.83
PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS
A. Functional Competencies
#REF! #REF!
Ratee Rater Approving Authority
EVELOPMENT PLANS
RESOURCES NEEDED
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION TOOL (COT) - RPMS
TEACHER I-III
RATING SHEET
OBSERVER: DATE:
TEACHER OBSERVED:
OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
DIRECTIONS FOR THE OBSERVER:
1. Rate each item on the checklist according to how well the teacher performed during the classroom
observation. Mark the appropriate column with a (/) mark.
2. Each indicator is assessed on an individual basis.
3. Attach your Observation Notes Form to the completed rating sheet.
THE TEACHER 3 4 5 6 7 NO
1. Applies knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas
Note: For schools with only one observer (i.e., Principal), this form serve as the final rating sheet.
Signature over Printed Name of the Observer Signature over Printed Name of the Teacher
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION TOOL (COT) - RPMS
TEACHER I-III
INTER-OBSERVER AGREEMENT FORM
DATE:
OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
DIRECTIONS FOR THE OBSERVER:
Signature over Printed Name of Signature over Printed Name of Signature over Printed Name of
Observer 1 Observer 2 Observer 3
#REF!
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION TOOL (COT) - RPMS
TEACHER I-III
INTER-OBSERVER AGREEMENT FORM
DATE:
OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
DIRECTIONS FOR THE OBSERVER:
OBSERVER: DATE:
OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS:
ANNOTATIONS