Ch2-Direct Time Study
Ch2-Direct Time Study
Engineering
Direct Time Study
References:
1. Mikell P. Groover (2014) Work Systems and the Methods, Measurement, and Management of Work.1st
Edition, Pearson.
2. Benjamin W. Niebel (1993) Motion and Time Study. 9th Edition, Irwin
3. Stevenson, W.J., and Chong, S.C. (2014),Operation Management, 2nd Edition. Mc Graw Hill.
4. Jay Heizer, and Barry Render (2014), Operations Management: Sustainability and Supply Chain
Management. Pearson
Form to document
the standard
method
Why Documentation is Important
Batch production – repeat orders after a
significant time lapse
Methods improvements by operator – to
restudy task, must be able to prove a change
has occurred
Disputes about method – operator complains
that standard is too tight
Is operator using the standard method?
Data for standard data system – good
documentation is essential for developing a
standard data system
Divide Task into Work Elements
Guidelines:
Each work element should consist of a logical
group of motion elements
Beginning point of one element should be the
end point of the preceding element
Each element should have a readily identifiable
end point
Work elements should not be too long nor too
short
Separate irregular elements, machine
elements, internal elements
Time the Work Elements
Each element should be timed over several
work cycles to obtain a reliable average
Stopwatch timing methods:
1. Snapback timing method – stopwatch is
reset to zero at the start of each work
element
2. Continuous timing method – stopwatch is
allowed to run continuously throughout the
duration of the work cycle
Advantages of Each Timing Method
Advantages of snapback method:
Analyst can readily see how element times
vary from cycle to cycle
No subtraction necessary to obtain
individual element times
Advantages of continuous method:
Elements cannot be omitted by mistake
Regular and irregular elements can be more
readily distinguished
Manipulation and resetting of the stopwatch
is reduced
Performance Rating
Analyst judges the performance or pace of the
worker relative to the definition of standard
performance used by the organization
Standard performance PR = 100%
Slower pace than standard PR < 100%
Faster pace than standard PR > 100%
Normal time Tn = Tobs(PR)
13.2
1. Constant allowance
(A) Personal allowance ……………... 5
(B) Basic fatigue allowance ………… 4
2. Variable allowances:
(A) Standing allowance ……………… 2
(B) Abnormal position
(i) Awkward (bending) ………… 2
(ii) Very awkward (lying,
stretching) …………………… 7
Rest Allowances
Tstd = Tn (1 + Apfd)
or
Total normal time
Standard time =
1 - Allowance factor
This formula used if allowances are based on a percentage of the
time worked (i.e., the workday)
Time Study Example 1
Average observed time = 4.0 minutes
Worker rating = 85%
Allowance factor = 13%
Tstd = Tn (1 + Apfd)
or
Total normal time
Standard time =
1 - Allowance factor
15.36
= = 18.07 minutes
1 - .15
Time Study Example 3
A process at a watch assembly plant has been changed. The
process is divided into three work elements. A time study has
been performed with the following results and the allowance for
the whole process is 18 percent of the total normal time.The
time standard for process previously was 14.5 minutes. Based
on the new time study, analyse whether the time standard
should be revised.
Average
Obs 1 Obs 2 Obs 3 Obs 4 PR
(min)
k = accuracy level (acceptable error) desired in percent of the job element, expressed as
a decimal
Number of Cycles to be Timed
Number of Cycles to be Timed
(example)
Seven cycles have been observed during a direct time study.
The mean for the largest element time = 0.85 min, and the
corresponding sample standard deviation s = 0.15 min, which
was also the largest. If the analyst wants to be 95% confident
that the mean of the sample was within 10% of the true mean,
analyse the number of observations should be taken.
Solution:
For dof = 6 degrees of freedom and = 0.05, t = 2.447
2
t / 2 s (2.447 )(0.15)
2
n 18 .65
k x (0.10 )(0.85)
rounded to 19 total observations
We need 19 – 7 = 12 more observations.
Number of Cycles to be Timed
(example)
A total of 9 cycles have been observed during a time study. The
mean for the largest element time = 0.80 min, and the
corresponding sample standard deviation s = 0.15 min, which
was also the largest. If the analyst wants to be 95% confident
that the mean of the sample was within 0.10 min of the true
mean, analyse the number of observations should be taken.
Solution:
For dof= 8 degrees of freedom and = 0.05, t = 2.306
Given that accuracy level, 0.10 min
2
t / 2 s (2.306 )(0.15)
2
n 11 .96
kx (0.10 )
rounded to 12 total observations
We need 12 – 9 = 3 more observations.
Performance Rating
Analyst observes and rates the worker’s
performance relative to the definition of
standard performance
The most difficult and controversial step in
direct time study
Potential conflict of interest between the
worker and the analyst
Most common performance rating method is
based on speed or pace
Traits of a Good Rating System
Consistency among tasks
A worker who can perform at 125% on one
task should be able to do the same on other
tasks
Consistency among analysts
Easy to explain and easy to understand
Based on a well-defined concept of standard
performance
Rate performance during the observation
Worker notification
Time Study Equipment
1. Stopwatch
Mechanical stopwatches
Electronic stopwatches
2. Video cameras
Provides visual and audio record of
method used by worker
3. Computerized techniques in direct time study
Use of PCs