Reducing Payment Processing Errors at LA County Using Lean Six Sigma

Reducing Payment Processing Errors
at LA County Using Lean Six Sigma
A Lean Six Sigma Success Story

Presented by Alex Ogunji
Lean Six Sigma Program Coordinator
at LA County Registrar Recorder County Clerk (RR/CC)
About LA County
Lean Six Sigma (LSS) Program

Coordinator, Master Black Belt
Alexander Ogunji.
The RR/CC’s LSS Program strives to:
•Identify and control root causes of

variance and defects
•Employee empowerment to do
process Improvement by using LSS
tools and methodology
• Eliminate Errors and Variability
• Reduce operational cost

INSITUTION OF LSS
PROGRAM:
•43 Sections, across

4 Bureaus utilize Idea
Boards
•1,000 Yellow Belts
Trained
•160 Green Belts
Trained
•8 Black Belts Trained
Los Angeles County
Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk
Lean Six Sigma Green Belt

Tri-Bureau Presentation
Project Certification
Variance Project
Recorder/County Clerk Bureau Administration Bureau Information Technology Bureau
(Ana Henderson, Jena Chen, Henrietta Willis-Kendall, David Palafox, Nilza Christopher, and Terrie L. Salazar)
Lean Six Sigma Green Belt Tri-Bureau Presentation | Variance Project
Background
➡What is a variance (as it relates to this project)?
• A discrepancy in credit card totals between JEDI and VitalChek
➡Discrepancies are caused by transactions being saved in one

system and not the other.
➡All three bureaus are impacted by these discrepancies.

Recorder/County
Clerk Bureau
Administration
Bureau
Team
Work
Information Technology Bureau

Swim Lane Map

Variance/Issue Process
Customer
Purchase Delay: Correctly

Customer
document waiting charged
County Clerk
Recorder/
User error Get feedback Report to

Delay:
OR Research Contact IT for from IT Administration
Payment
Error between JEDI variance assistance variance is variance is
process
and VitalChek resolved resolved
Delay:
Find credit card Manually search Contact Verify during
Admin
variance during Recorder for reconciliation

for variances for
reconciliation corrective research & variance is
process action resolution resolved
Information
Technology
Provide Research &

assistance to resolve
Recorder variance
Recorder/County Clerk Bureau

Problem (Defect)
➡ User error
• Credit card transactions were not voided in JEDI or VitalChek
• Supervisors did not change the received method from “web” to “counter” which
caused duplicate transactions
➡ Knowledge gap
• Supervisors needed more knowledge and training to fix VitalChek issues
• Cashiers did not know how to handle transactions when VitalChek failed to
provide a confirmation
Impact
➡Customers waited for extended periods of time
➡Transaction processing delays
➡Workflow interruptions
➡Inability for Section Heads and/or supervisors to properly balance

collections at the end of the day
Solution
➡BDM SMEs assisted IT with identifying frequently recurring variances
➡Cashiers and supervisors received standardized training by IT
➡Cashiers and supervisors received 8 credit card troubleshooting cheat

sheets from IT
Benefit
➡Standardized solutions for recurring
variance issues
➡Ability to handle issues and variances

within BDM without IT assistance
➡Improved ability to balance cash

drawers at day’s end
Administration Bureau
Cash Management Unit (CMU)
Problem (Defect)
CMU finds a variance during the collection reconciliation process
➡Staff had to manually compare paper

documents to locate variances
• 3 hours spent on locating each variance
➡23 variances discovered in a 9-month period

(06/11/15 - 03/30/16)
• Total time spent on locating variances is 69 hours
Impact
➡Requires dual custody in partners of 2 staff
➡Disrupts the time-sensitive reconciliation process
➡Creates a trickle down effect

• Time allocated for Daily Distribution Report is shifted
- 3 staff to manually locate variance
- Other staff must perform double or triple dual custody shifts to replace
those 3 staff
➡Delays the generation of the Daily Distribution Report which affects

another Finance unit
Solution
➡Developed streamline method to locate the variances using Microsoft Excel
➡Created a step-by-step reference guide for CMU
➡Developed hands-on training for CMU Staff with mock variances.
➡Completed all training for CMU staff

Benefit
➡Time reduction
3 hours à 10 minutes
➡Increased productivity
3 staff à 1 staff
➡Less disruption to workflows
Information Technology Bureau

Business Systems and Analysis (BSA) Section
Problem (Defect)
➡No standardization on how to prevent or resolve issues and
variances
➡IT was always called to assist when issues and variances could have
been handled internally within the respective section/unit
➡Variances caused by archived incomplete web orders not

appearing on Finance reports
Impact
➡Disruption of analytical work
➡Resources of 3 analysts per variance
➡Substantial amount of time spent for research and resolution

• 18 hours per week which equates to 936 hours per year
Solution
➡Purged incomplete web orders after 90 days
➡Created the list containing various variances encountered
by staff
➡Created 8 different resolution cheat sheets for cashiers and
supervisors
➡Provided two types of user training

•Cashier Training
•Supervisor Training
•HQ: 94% of staff trained

•District Offices: 29% of staff trained (in process)
Benefit
➡Variance reduction
8 variances à 1 variance per month
3 analysts à 1 analyst
➡Time reduction
936 hours à 60 hours per year

Total Benefit (Across Three

Bureaus)
➡Variance reduction
8 variances à 1 variance per month (800% reduction)
6 staff à 2 staff (300% reduction)
➡Total time reduction
1028 hours à 66 hours per year (1557% reduction)

Questions?
Just-In-Time Podcast
Check out more success stories from Go Getters just like you at
GoLeanSixSigma.com/success
More questions?
Ask us at contact@goleansixsigma.com!
Click here to download

free tools, templates, infographics and more!
Thank you for joining us!

Reducing Payment Processing Errors at LA County Using Lean Six Sigma

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Reducing Payment Processing Errors at LA County Using Lean Six Sigma

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Reducing Payment Processing Errors at LA County Using Lean Six Sigma

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Reducing Payment Processing Errors

at LA County Using Lean Six Sigma

A Lean Six Sigma Success Story

Lean Six Sigma (LSS) Program

The RR/CC’s LSS Program strives to:

•Identify and control root causes of

• Eliminate Errors and Variability

• Reduce operational cost

•43 Sections, across

Lean Six Sigma Green Belt

➡Discrepancies are caused by transactions being saved in one

➡All three bureaus are impacted by these discrepancies.

Information Technology Bureau

Swim Lane Map

Purchase Delay: Correctly

User error Get feedback Report to

variance during Recorder for reconciliation

Provide Research &

Recorder/County Clerk Bureau

➡Transaction processing delays

➡Inability for Section Heads and/or supervisors to properly balance

➡Cashiers and supervisors received standardized training by IT

➡Cashiers and supervisors received 8 credit card troubleshooting cheat

➡Ability to handle issues and variances

➡Improved ability to balance cash

➡Staff had to manually compare paper

➡23 variances discovered in a 9-month period

➡Disrupts the time-sensitive reconciliation process

➡Creates a trickle down effect

➡Delays the generation of the Daily Distribution Report which affects

➡Created a step-by-step reference guide for CMU

➡Developed hands-on training for CMU Staff with mock variances.

➡Completed all training for CMU staff

Information Technology Bureau

➡Variances caused by archived incomplete web orders not

➡Resources of 3 analysts per variance

➡Substantial amount of time spent for research and resolution

➡Provided two types of user training

•HQ: 94% of staff trained

936 hours à 60 hours per year

Total Benefit (Across Three

8 variances à 1 variance per month (800% reduction)

6 staff à 2 staff (300% reduction)

➡Total time reduction

1028 hours à 66 hours per year (1557% reduction)

Click here to download

Thank you for joining us!

You might also like