Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

CHAPTER 7: The Balanced Scorecard: A Tool To Implement Strategy The Balanced Scorecard Features of A Good Balanced Scorecard

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

CHAPTER 7: The balanced scorecard: A tool to 4.

Innovation and Learning – measures of the


implement strategy firm’s ability to develop and utilize human
resources to meet the strategic goals now
The Balanced Scorecard and into the future.
■ Translates the organization's mission and Features of a Good Balanced Scorecard
strategy into a set of performance measures
that provides a framework for implementing 1. The balanced scorecard should tell the story
strategy. of a company’s strategy by articulating a
sequence of cause-and-effect relationships.
■ It is used to measure the company's health or
performance. 2. It helps to communicate the strategy to all
members if of the organization by
■ The scorecard measures organization's translating the strategy into a coherent and
performance from four perspectives: linked set to understandable and measurable
financial, customer, internal processes, and operational targets.
learning and growth.
3. In for-profit companies, the balanced
■ Strategic information using critical success scorecard places strong emphasis on
factors such as growth in sales and earnings, financial objectives and measures.
cash flow, stock price, market share, product
quality, customer satisfaction, and growth 4. The balanced scorecard should focus only
opportunities provides a road map for a firm on key measures to be used by identifying
to chart its competitive course and serves as only the most critical ones.
a benchmark for a competitive success.
5. The scorecard should highlight suboptimal
■ To emphasize the importance of using tradeoffs that managers may make when
strategic information, both financial and they failed to consider operational and
nonfinancial, accounting reports of a firm's financial measure together.
performance are now often based on critical
Pitfalls in Implementing a Balanced Scorecard
success factors in different dimensions.
1. Don’t assume the cause-and-effect linkages
■ Financial performance measures -
are precise.
summarize the results of past actions and are
important to a firm's owners, creditors, 2. Don’t seek improvements across all of the
employees and so forth. measures all of the time.
■ Nonfinancial performance measures - 3. Don’t use only objective measures in the
concentrate on current activities which will balanced scorecard.
be drivers of future financial performance.
4. Don’t fail to consider both costs and benefits
Four Perspectives of the Balanced Scorecard of initiatives before including these
objectives in the balanced scorecard.
1. Financial Perspective – measures of
profitability and market value among others, 5. Don’t ignore nonfinancial measures when
as indicators of how well the firm satisfies evaluating managers and employees.
its owners and shareholders.
6. Don’t use too many measures.
2. Customer Satisfaction – measures of
quality service and low cost, among others,
as indicators of how well the firm satisfies
its customers.

3. Internal Business Processes – measures of


the efficacy and effectiveness with which the
firm produces the product or service.
Evaluating The Success Of A Strategy

Assume the following operating incomes: Internal Business Processes Performance

Year 2003 Year 2004 Delivery cycle time – The amount of time from when
an order is received from a customer to when the
Revenues: completed order is shipped is called delivery time
(1,000,000×$26) $26,000,000 cycle.

(1,100,000×$24) $26,400,000 Throughput (Manufacturing Cycle) time – The


amount of time required to turn raw materials into
Expenses: completed products is called throughput time or
manufacturing cycle time. It is made up of process
Materials 4,050,000 3,631,320
time, inspection time, move time, and queue time.
Other 16,000,000 16,000,000
Process time – The amount of time work is actually
Operating income $5,950,000 $6,768,680
done on the product.
How can the increase in operating income of
Inspection time – The amount of time spent ensuring
$818,680 be evaluated?
that the product is not defective.
Growth Component
Move time – The time required to move material or
Revenue effect of growth component = (Actual partially completed products from workstation to
units of output sold in 2004 - Actual units of output workstation.
sold in 2003) x Output price in 2003
Queue time – The amount of time a product spends
Cost effect of growth component = (Actual units of waiting to be worked, to be moved, to be inspected,
input or capacity that would have been used in 2003 or to be shipped.
to produce year 2004 output assuming the same
Manufacturing Cycle Efficiency – Through
input-output relationship that existed in 2003 - Actual
concerted effort to eliminate the non-value-added
units or capacity to produce 2003 output) x Input
activities of inspecting, moving, and queuing to
prices in 2003
reduce their throughput time to only a fraction of
Price-Recovery Component previous level.

Revenue effect of price-recovery component = Manufacturing Cycle Efficiency Formula


(Output price in 2004 – Output price in 2003) ×
MCE = Value Added Time (or Process Time)
Actual units of output sold in 2004
Manufacturing Cycle Time
Cost effect of price-recovery component = (Input
prices in 2004 – Input prices in 2003) x Actual units where:
of inputs or capacity that would have been used to
produce year 2004 output assuming the same input- Manufacturing cycle time= Process time + Inspection
output relationship that existed in 2003 time + Move time + Queue time

Productivity Component

Productivity component = (Actual units of inputs or


capacity to produce year 2004 output - Actual units of
inputs or capacity that would have been used to
produce year 2004 output assuming the same input-
output relationship that existed in 2003) x Input
prices in 2004

You might also like