Profed107 Week5
Profed107 Week5
Profed107 Week5
CURRICULUM
DEVELOPMENT
Prepared by:
Walter Phillip SP. Palad, R.N., LPT
Philosophical Foundations
1.Perennialism
2.Essentialism
3.Progressivism
4.Reconstructionism
PERENNIALISM
• Perennialism in education is the belief that schools
should teach ideas that are everlasting. Evergreen
ideas, which have lasted through many
generations, are a major focus of a perennialist
curriculum.
Theodore Brameld
Social reconstructionism promotes teachers to
not tell students what is right or wrong in
society, but instead to guide students by
exploring social issues, presenting alternative
viewpoints, and facilitating student analysis of
the issues.
•AIM: To improve and reconstruct society.
Education for change.
•ROLE: Teacher acts as agent of change
and reforms.
•Focus:Present and future educational
landscapes.
•TRENDS: School and curricular reforms,
Global education and convergence,
Standards and competencies.
HISTORICAL
FOUNDATIONS
Ralph Tyler (1902 – 1994)
PSYCHOLOGICAL
FOUNATIONS
Persons Contributions/ Theories/
Principles
Selecting Objectives
Organizing Learning
Experiences
Evaluation
Taba’s Grassroots Rational Model
2. Formulation of objectives
3. Selection of content
4. Organization of content
5. Selection of learning
Experiences
6. Organization of learning
Experiences
Stage 2: Determine
acceptable evidence
Stage 2
Designing assessment evidence for
documenting/ validating whether the
desired learning has been achieved
Stage 3
Planning learning experiences
Teacher decide on the type of activities
that the student will do and materials
needed
Murray Print Model for Curriculum
Development
Instructional
Evaluation
Monitoring and
Curriculum Feedback, Curriculum
Presage Evaluation
Selection of
Evaluation
Objectives
4. Organization and
integration of learning
experiences and content
Dynamic Models
Walker’s Model
Skilbeck’s Model
Pawilen’s Model
Walker’s Model of Curriculum
Development
Decker Walker, 1971
He was particularly interested on how curriculum
workers actually do their task in curriculum development
Since it is dynamic, the curriculum workers may
commence at any point in the curriculum process
depending on their needs. This allows more flexibility
among curriculum workers in developing curriculum.
Curriculum may review their previous decisions and
actions to correct some mistakes.
It can be used for School base curriculum development
Weakness of Walker’s model is a strong
tendency of the curriculum development to
be stuck in phase 2. According to Print, too
much discussion may lead to analysis –
paralysis syndrome that could penalize or
prolong the process of curriculum
development.
Probably, the model can be elaborated
more on phase 3 to help teachers and
neophyte curriculum workers o their task.
Beliefs, Theories, Conceptions, Points of views, Aims,
Objectives
Platform
Deliberation
Curriculum
Design
Skilbeck’s Curriculum Development
Model
oSkilbeck, 1976
oCurriculum workers may start from
any phase, however each phase is
interrelated and follows a systematic
sequence
Situational Analysis
Goal Formulation
Program Building
Interpretation and
Implementation
Monitoring, Feedback,
Assessment, Reconstruction
Pawilen’s Model for Curriculum
Development
Pawilen, 2011
The author developed this model as one
of the major outputs in his doctoral
dissertation in the UP, Diliman.
It is intended to help curriculum workers
develop curriculum that is relevant and
appropriate to the Philippine context
1. Situational Analysis
Curriculum
2. Selection of Goals and
Sources:
Objectives
1. Learners
2. Society 3. Development of Curriculum
3. Discipline Standards
a. Developing a comprehensive set
of standards
b. Aligning standards with set of
criteria
Curriculum c. Securing teacher’s input
Influences: d. Validating standards by experts
1. External e. Developing final curriculum
2. Internal 4. Selection of contents or Subject
3. Organizational
7. Evaluation 6. Implementation
Analysis of
Different
Curriculum Models
Prescriptive
Tyler’s Model
Taba’s Grassroot Model
Pawilen’s Model
UBD Model
Nicholls & Nicholls Model
Print’s Model
Rational Dynamic
or or
Objective Wheeler’s Model Walker’s Model Interaction
Descriptive
We can always learn some principles
from these models:
1. When developing a model for curriculum development,
there is always the need for a clear and logical process.
2. Curriculum sources and other variables that are
influential in developing a curriculum should be
specified.
3. Models should reflect how educators plan and develop
curriculum in any levels.
4. Models should be based on curriculum theory.
5. Each process in a model should specify areas where
curriculum decisions are made.
6. Each model should reflect the major phases of
curriculum development ( planning, designing,
implementation and evaluation )