Drilling and Testing of An HPHT Deep Gas Prospect From An Existing Well: Case History
Drilling and Testing of An HPHT Deep Gas Prospect From An Existing Well: Case History
Drilling and Testing of An HPHT Deep Gas Prospect From An Existing Well: Case History
Figure 2 (left): Originally, KM-3 Well Schematic - Prior to Re-entry • Run 7-in. x 7 5/8-in. tie-back (7-in. to
KM-3 was planned with a top of 8 5/8-in. drilling liner) to sur-
“big hole” casing, typical in
30-in. CSG SHOE @ 750-ft.
face
Kuwait due to high differential 24-in. CSG SHOE @ 6,228-ft.
In Designs 2 and 3, the production liners
pressures between zones, as 18-5/8-in. CSG SHOE @ 9,584-ft.
(5 ½-in. / 7-in.) have been extended to
well as low pore pressures. JURASSIC / TRIASSIC cover the previous drilling liners to allow
However, in this part of the Formations Depth (ft) 10-3/4-in. LINER TOP @ 12,577-ft.
for the production loads.
field, pore pressure is higher
13-1/2-in. CSG SHOE @ 13,188-ft. The final decision was for the adoption
and the differential pressure HITH 13,323
of Design 1. After running safety fac-
less pronounced. Therefore, tor calculations for the casing and liner
the Jurassic formations could
GOTNIA 13,643
combinations, the following casing pro-
be commingled in the same CEMENT RETAINER @ 14,883-ft.
WITH CEMENT PLUG ON TOP gram was chosen:
hole section for both KM-1
10-3/4-in. LINER SHOE @ 14,944-ft. • 7 5/8-in. liner, 70.7 lbs/ft, Q-125, pre-
and KM-3. NAJMAH 14,950
MARRAT 15,388
• 7 5/8-in. tie-back, 70.7 lbs/ft, T-95, pre-
mium connections
premium connections
18.8 PPG OIL BASE MUD
L. MARRAT 16,338
Production Loading Safety Factor
Figure 3 (below): Of the pos- 9-1/4-in. OPEN HOLE TO 16,536-ft.
sible design combinations, The next main decision point was the
Designs 2 and 3 featured
MINJUR 16,985 cementation of the production tie-back
casing in relation to the production loads
extended production liners.
generated under the tubing leak sce-
Design 1 uses minimum cas- JILH 17,570
nario. The criteria taken were: a Sudair
ing requirements, with liners pore pressure of 19 ppg, gas to surface,
run in standard size holes JILH SALT 18167
and a supporting gradient of 8.4 ppg
without under-reaming or (water) for the cemented tie-back.
RWD. This design also allows
SUDAIR 18,695
KM-3 Casing Design 1 Casing Design 2 Casing Design 3 still maintain a 1.2 safety factor for burst.
Formation Depth (ft)
Therefore the design loading was run
with a series of underbalanced completion
fluid weights and cemented lengths. 11.2
ppg calcium chloride brine was selected,
which allowed the maximum length of
production tieback to be cemented.
testing, all the cement batches needed for the jobs were identi- section, drilled with an 18.6 ppg mud, was estimated to
fied and reserved and their quality individually controlled. be from 316 to 286 HP, at an average surface pressure of
4,100 psi.
Cement additives
• With the use of oil-based mud and given that the turbine
Based on North Sea and Kuwaiti well experience, selected is of all-metallic construction, the turbine was considered
additives were chosen for this well. The properties required to have much greater reliability with longer running hours
in the slurry were: good stability, low rheology, good fluid loss than the use of elastomer stator PDMs.
control, good retarder response, fast compressive strength
development and good mixability. • The turbine is not affected by stalling.
The choice of synthetic retarders was important for this HPHT • Depending on the mud weight and rheology, the turbine
cementing. They have a more linear response and a greater power section (i.e., number of turbine stages and blade
tolerance to changes in bottomhole circulating temperature type) can be modified for optimum performance.
than do lignosulphonate systems.
To obtain the maximum benefit from the output parameters of
One of the most important issues was the quality control of the the turbine, the bit supplier worked with the motor contractor
additives. All of the chemicals reserved for the job had a single to enhance the design of the PDC bits to provide resistance
batch or lot number, which simplified the lab testing and gave to abrasive wear at the higher turbine RPMs. The stabilizer
confidence on the behavior of each pattern used was a fully packed
additive. KM-3 configuration to provide optimum
Days from Re-entry Vs. Depth
stability and the transmission of
Fluids recommendations
16,500
Slim-hole coring
The planned slurry weight was
expected to be 19.5 ppg, with a With the chosen casing design,
spacer weight of 19.2 ppg. the hole size through the reservoir
was restricted to 5 ½-in. To core
Lab test results gave a thickening in this size of hole, the choice was
time of about 10:00 hrs with a fluid 17,500
between a 4 ¾-in. barrel, which
loss of under 30 cc / 30 min. would recover a 2 5/8-in. core, or
a slim hole 4 1/8-in. barrel, which
Measured Depth (ft.)
trol the mud weight value and pump output within a range that Attempts were made to continue drilling while combating the
was suitable for the motor to drill effectively. loss / gain cycles. At 18,331 ft with partial losses at 30 bbl/
hr and a mud weight of 19.6 ppg, it was necessary to trip the
DRILLING OPERATIONS string to remove the turbine. To control the formation flows,
the mud weight was raised in stages to 19.9 ppg. On attempt-
The well was re-entered and drilled to TD in 79 days against ing to trip, the well was not taking the correct amount of fluid,
a planned figure of 54 days. The drilling curve is illustrated in therefore the drill pipe volume was bull-headed and 20.5 ppg
Figure 4. kill mud pills pumped into the annulus during the rest of the
trip to control this tendency to flow.
9 ¼-in. Phase
As it was not possible to continue drilling with this high mud
Re-entry and clean-out of original hole
weight, it was decided to attempt to stabilize the lower part
The initial operation of cleaning out the cement and suspen- of the hole by squeezing cement. A cement retainer was run,
sion plug to 10 ¾-in. shoe at 14,936 ft required excessive ream- and 300 bbl of 17 ppg cement was squeezed into the open
ing from about 7,000 ft onwards; probably due to barite sag- hole.
ging as the mud left in the original hole was not treated with
Following a negative test to 19 ppg, the mud weight was
viscosifiers for long-term suspension.
reduced to 19.5 ppg, and the hole washed and reamed to
As the 9 ¼-in. open hole was cleaned to 15,419 ft, gas levels 16,400 ft, where a 7-bbl gain was registered on a flow check
increased and the mud weight increased to 18.9 ppg. During (SIDPP 810 psi, MWE 19.95 ppg). The mud weight was raised
the subsequent flow check the well was found to be flowing and to 19.9 ppg, and washing and reaming continued up to 18,331 ft
on resuming circulation, losses occurred. Therefore, LCM pills through patches of firm cement.
were pumped to plug the loss zones and the mud weight was
New hole was drilled to 18,390 ft, where the well again flowed
gradually raised in attempt to stop the flow on the annulus.
at 50 bbl/hr. The mud weight was raised to 20.2 ppg, and the
This loss/gain cycle continued during the reaming of the pre- well again went into a loss /gain cycle. At a final mud weight of
viously drilled open hole down to the original TD of 16,662 20.4 ppg, the well was put on losses to trip.
ft. At this point, mud weight had been increased to 19.2 ppg.
With the well in this critical state at the limits of the conven-
Attempts were made to deepen the hole using this mud weight,
tional mud weights and with the experience from well KM-1,
but drilling was stopped at 16,700 ft due to further flows and
where Minjur to top Khuff were drilled in the same hole size,
losses. At this point, total fluid losses had increased to 7,490
the decision was taken to run the 7 5/8-in. casing earlier than its
bbl and total LCM pumped was 1,960 bbl.
programmed setting depth. It was further evaluated that this
Mud weights were now much higher than those seen during the would at least secure the Jurassic objectives, while giving a bet-
original drilling and, given the narrow range between loss and ter chance to reach the deeper horizons.
gain, a decision was taken to squeeze cement across the entire
This salt water flow from the Jilh salt / limestone sequence
open hole section to try and seal off the problem areas.
was not seen on the offset well KM-1. Total losses since prob-
200 bbl of 19.5-ppg cement was squeezed through a retainer lems were encountered in the Jilh Salt sequence were 5,140 bbl
set above the 10 ¾-in. shoe into the open hole, the mud weight
Running the 7 5/8-in. liner
cut to 19 ppg and firm cement cleaned out to a depth of 15,355
ft, following which the hole was washed / reamed to the exist- The 7 5/8-in. liner string was run with the well in a static condi-
ing TD at 16,700 ft with no further losses or gains. tion. There were no returns on breaking circulation with the
liner shoe at the 10 ¾-in. shoe, or at the setting depth.
Drilling to the Jilh Salt Formation
The 7 5/8-in. hanger did not set, and the string was cemented on
Rotary drilling continued with a PDC bit to the top of the
bottom with 100 bbl of spacer and 150 bbl of 20.5 ppg cement.
Minjur formation (16,985 ft), where penetration rates came
The cement weight was heavier than first proposed, but the
down from 7 ft/hr at the start of the Minjur to 2 ft/hr by 17,150
properties were fully tested prior to the job. There were no
ft, with the formation consisting of firm shales. The penetration
returns while circulating or cementing with total formation
rates continued to remain low, even when the mud weight was
losses being 1,032 bbl. The liner top packer was successfully
lowered to 18 ppg above the Jilh formation at 17,570 ft, where
set after the cement displacement.
the estimated pore pressure had reduced to 17.6 ppg. With
such low ROPs, it was decided to pick up the turbine. The mixing of the slurry was as per the pre-job simulations,
but one point of concern was the high pump pressures needed
A 6 5/8-in. turbine was run with a new 9 ¼-in. PDC bit. Initial
when attempting to reverse out after the job. This had also
penetration rates of 6 ft/hr was reduced to 4 ft/hr, and a trip
been seen on the previous two cement squeeze jobs. After
was made to check the condition of the bit, which was only 5%
investigation, it was recommended for future jobs to change
worn. A different design PDC bit was picked up, and drilling
the spacer chemical and to use a drill pipe wiper ball to
rates increased, from 6 ft/hr up to a maximum of 15 ft/hr at the
remove any residual cement from the DP.
top of the first Jilh salt (18,167 ft).
5 ½-in. phase
Drilling continued to 18,292 ft, where a kick was encountered
and was shut in with 1,540 psi on the drill pipe (equivalent to Drilling to core point in the Sudair
19.6 ppg mud). On first circulation, the mud weight was cut to
16.5 ppg with the influx being salt water. After the second circu- Tieback of the 7 5/8-in. liner to surface, prior to drilling out, was
lation with 19.3 ppg in and out, the BOP was opened and the well then discussed. The vulnerability of the 10 ¾-in. casing due to
circulated at 300 gpm with an ECD at 20.3 ppg, which held the the number of rotating hours, was weighted against the flow /
formation. standpipe pressure restrictions imposed by using a full 3 ½-in.
drill pipe string to surface. In the end, the condition of the 10 Running 4 ½-in. liner and 7 5/8-in. tie-back
¾-in. was considered acceptable for drilling to continue.
The 4 ½-in. liner string was run with partial to no returns. The
With the shoe integrity checked up to an EMW of 20.1 ppg and liner was hung and cemented with 35 bbl of 20.0 ppg cement
a 19.6 ppg mud weight, 5 ½-in. hole was drilled to 18,512 ft, slurry. The cement plug was not bumped, and no returns during
where losses were encountered at 60 bbl/hr in the lower part of the job. On attempting to pull out the liner setting tool, there
the Jilh formation. were indications that the liner had not been released. When the
string was pulled to surface, the liner hanger was found to be
The open hole was cemented through a 7 5/8-in. cement retainer, held by the pack-off bushing dogs, which had not released.
and cement drilled out with the lower mud weight of 18.8 ppg.
Hard cement was reamed out during the clean-out trip to the
Drilling continued without further incident into the Sudair for- liner TD at 19,050 ft. On observing the well, it was found to be
mation (top at 18,695 ft) to a core point at 18,730 ft. flowing at 90 bbl/hr; therefore attempts were made to put the
Coring and drilling to TD well on losses by pumping high weight slugs, which resulted
in partial returns of 78%. The well continued to flow, and the
A 60 ft x 4 ¾-in. core barrel was made up with a 5 ½-in. PDC mud weight was raised in stages to 20.1 ppg with mud losses
corehead, and six cores were cut through the Sudair into the of 50%. 22 ppg slugs were again bullheaded into drill pipe and
top Khuff to 19,045 ft. The mud weight at the start of the sec- annulus to trip the pipe.
tion was 18.8 ppg, and this was raised to 19.2 ppg following an
The same liner hanger was reconditioned and the shoe modi-
influx with increase in gas count plus chlorides during the cut-
fied with v-set blades on the nose, to aid release. The 4 ½-in.
ting of core No. 5.
liner was re-run, with no returns and fluid level static at the
A 5 ½-in. PDC bit was run, and drilling continued in the Khuff wellhead. The liner was released on bottom and cemented with
to 19,057 ft, where losses started at 30 bbl/hr. An LCM pill was 35 bbl of 20.5 ppg cement. Again the plug was not bumped, and
pumped, and the section drilled to 19,077 ft, where losses again there were no returns during the job.
occurred. At this point, drilling was shut down to change out
To ensure isolation, a 7 5/8-in. cement retainer was set at
the wash pipe. During the repair process, the well was closed-
17,706 ft and the top of the liner squeezed with 30 bbl of 20 ppg
in, and 800 psi pressure was recorded on the annulus.
cement. After cleaning out and polishing the PBR, a liner top
The influx was circulated out, and the mud weight raised back packer was run and set, and negative tests were carried out
to 19.2 ppg. On attempting to POH with the string, the well to 10.5 ppg EMW at the top of the 4 ½-in. liner, and to 16 ppg
started to flow (ECD during the drilling being estimated at 19.5 EMW on the 7 5/8-in. liner lap. The mud weight was reduced to
ppg). The well was closed-in, and the mud weight raised in 16 ppg, and the 7 5/8-in. casing tie-back was run and cemented
stages up to 19.8 ppg. with 180 bbl of 16.5 ppg cement.
The hole was then reamed down to 19,053 ft, with high torque End of well operations
and losses (17% returns). LCM pills were pumped, but the loss- Clean out and preparation for Testing
es increased with only 5% fluid returns. The well was observed
as static at this point, and the drill string pulled out to the cas- A 3 ½-in. mill plus 2 7/8-in. slim-hole motor were run on 2 3/8-in.
ing shoe. After checking for flow, the bit was pulled to surface, drill tubing, and the 4 ½-in. liner was cleaned out to 18,912 ft,
with the mud level not visible during the trip. where the wiper plug assembly was tagged. Given the limited
performance of the motor to this point, the mud weight was
With the hole again in an unstable condition, a further squeeze lowered from 16 to 14 ppg in an attempt to improve the motor
with acid soluble cement (17.5 ppg) was carried out through parameters. Two further mill runs, including a change of
a retainer. On drilling out the cement, flows and losses were motor, were made but, it was not possible to clear further than
again evident, and the mud weight was once more increased to 18,915 ft; therefore the motor was laid down.
19.9 ppg due to a CO2 influx.
It was decided to try a slightly reduced diameter mill (3 ¼-in.
The well was put on losses by bull-heading 22 ppg mud slugs OD) and to run it on a rotary assembly. A close watch was paid
down annulus and drill pipe, and the bit was pulled to surface. to the torque levels during drilling given the use of the 2 3/8-in.
Once on surface, it was found that the bit had lost all three drill tubing.
cones. In order to re-stabilize the well, a second cement retain-
er was set, and 100 bbl of 17.5 ppg acid soluble cement was The plug assembly was drilled up, without undue torque prob-
squeezed below. On pulling out the string, it was found that the lems and the cement plus shoe track cleaned out to a plug
drag blocks and spring from the retainer setting tool had been back TD of 19,040 ft. This left a remaining length of 10 ft of
left in the hole, therefore a 5 3/8-in. mill and junk sub were run cement above the liner shoe. It was a requirement to drill up
to clean out the junk and retainer. this much of the shoe track as the zone of interest extended
down to the top of the Khuff formation.
The well was finally cleaned out to a plug back depth of 19,050
ft, which was chosen to be above the suspected loss zone in the The 4 ½-in. liner shoe was negative tested to 10.5 ppg EMW,
Khuff formation. On circulating prior to logging, the well again followed by a positive pressure test of the entire column.
started to flow. The well was closed-in, and mud weight was The drilling mud was displaced to brine in several circulation
increased in stages to 19.8 ppg, where losses started. Due to steps, due to the circulation pressures involved. First the oil-
subsequent flow, the weight was raised further to 19.9 ppg, by based mud was reduced in density from 14 to 12.5 ppg. This
which time losses had increased, with only 40% returns. At this was followed by the circulation of scavenger / surfactant pill
stage, the decision was taken to cancel the open-hole logs and train to remove the oil base mud ahead of the 11.2 ppg calcium
to immediately run the 4 ½-in. liner (Figure 5). chloride brine. An extended observation period was applied
to check the well for any flow back. The fluid movements due
to temperature effects were plotted in order to check for any of well site supervision and good cooperation of the rig con-
traces of abnormal fluid flow. tractor.
Cased hole logs were then run and preparations made for test- Utilization of the latest technology and products in HPHT
ing. It was noted that the CBL log showed fairly good cement cementing gave good results during the slurry mixing and dis-
across the 4 ½-in. liner, particularly around the liner shoe and placement, the only problem being the reaction of the spacer
above the zone to be perforated. during primary and squeeze cementing.
HPHT cementing
• For squeeze jobs using high-density cements and spacers (over
18.0 ppg), use compatible spacer chemical with rig supplied
barite. Spacer volumes to be increased to clean drill pipe.
• Use drill pipe wiper ball to remove any residual cement from
the DP during cement squeeze jobs.
Downhole motors and rental tubulars
• Turbodrills to be considered for future drilling of deeper
formations. They gave ROP increases compared with rotary
assemblies, with no equipment failures or evidence of down-
hole vibration. A circulation sub should be run to allow
pumping of coarse LCM.
• Found 2 3/8-in. CS-Hydril tubing suitable for rotation and
cleared plugs and cement inside the 4 ½-in. liner.
Liner hangers / tieback
• Procedure to be developed in conjunction with supplier for
effective disengagement of liner running tool after cementing
to ensure deep set, lightweight liners, in heavy mud weights
do not travel up.
Testing
DST and TCP
• Effective makeup OD of eccentric tools must be verified by
the supplier with reference to the limiting string OD that can
be run in the wellbore (i.e., vendors gauge carrier could not
be run due to an oversized effective OD).
• DST tools are designed to stay in the hole for relatively short
testing duration (within a month). In the case of KM-3, DST
tools were in the hole for over 28 days, and they all functioned
as designed. Contingency plans must be considered in case the
tools are to be kept in the hole for longer. In this well, minimum
downhole tools were used and two reversing valves were run.
• Designing the job with bigger ID permanent packer would:
o Allow the use of bigger OD firing head and redundant firing
head.
o Provide more flow area through the packer.
Surface testing
• Salt production at surface affected the stability of flow rate
measurements. Amount of salt produced at surface was
directly proportional to choke size. Technologies to be inves-
tigated to enable uninterrupted well production testing from
salt saturated formations without risk of salt plugging in sur-
face lines and production tubing.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to express their appreciation to Kuwait Oil Company for
permission to publish the information on Kra Al Maru 3 and would like to
thank all who contributed to the KM-3 Project, including Deep Drilling I
Team members, especially field personnel; Red Roberts and Paul King (KOC
Senior Supervisors), Galen Heth and Bill Wagstaff (KOC Supervisors),
KOC Exploration Teams, KPD Rig-24 crew, MI mud engineers, Halliburton
Cementing Team, Sperry Sun Mud Logging engineers, Schlumberger Well
Test Team and Axis Well Technology for their quality service and support.
This paper was prepared for presentation at the IADC/SPE Asia Pacific
Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition held in Bankok, Thailand,
13–15 November 2006.
References
Al-Saeedi, M., Al-Mutairi, B., Al-Khaldy, M., Sheeran, T., “Fastest Deep Well
in North Kuwait: Case History of Raudhatain 206”, SPE 85287