Lifetime Prediction For Organic Coatings On Steel and A Magnesium Alloy Using Electrochemical Impedance Methods
Lifetime Prediction For Organic Coatings On Steel and A Magnesium Alloy Using Electrochemical Impedance Methods
Lifetime Prediction For Organic Coatings On Steel and A Magnesium Alloy Using Electrochemical Impedance Methods
of low resistance. Thus, the main role of a barrier-type (16 µm to 20 µm thick) over conversion-coated or
organic coating is to adhere to the substrate and anodized Mg.10 It was proposed that the anodized
maintain high ionic resistance, which inhibits the ability substrate provided excellent bonding for an organic
of local anodes and cathodes to support electron coating, but that a final epoxy resin thickness of 16 µm
transfer reactions at appreciable rates. to 20 µm was required to properly seal the pores in the
A review of the literature in 1979 suggested anodized layer.10 The LF impedance was a good
coatings with a “critical” or threshold resistance of measure of coating performance. However, impedance
< 107 Ω per cm2 of measured surface area are not values have not been correlated extensively with
protective.3-4 Consequently, determination of the coating lifetimes for coated Mg because of the
electrical resistance of the coating, the defect area of relatively short exposure periods used.
the coating, and the anodic-to-cathodic site density Moreover, critical or threshold impedance values
provides a figure of merit describing the degree of used as indicators to forecast a high probability of
protection provided by a coating. coating failure after much longer exposure have not
Electrochemical impedance provides a means to been compared for organic coatings on steel and Mg.
estimate some of the important electrical and physical The present study had three objectives. The first
coating parameters mentioned above. Although was to assess the utility of equivalent circuit models
electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) developed for coated steel for use with coated Mg. The
methods have been applied to the study of electro- second was to determine whether the most significant
chemical processes for more than three decades, they impedance parameters in terms of ability to forecast
first were used to probe the frequency dependence of long-term performance for coated steel applied equally
the electrical and electrochemical characteristics of well to Mg. The third was to determine whether the
coated metal surfaces in the early 1980s.5-6 Studies critical or threshold impedance values obtained at early
aimed at exploring the utility of impedance techniques exposure times forecasted later performance.
for lifetime prediction of coatings on steels demon-
strated that certain impedance parameters measured EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
after several weeks of exposure correlated well with AND DATA INTERPRETATION
the coating performance after > 1 y.7-8 Important
impedance parameters included the low-frequency Materials
(LF) impedance magnitude (e.g., ≤ 10 mHz), coating Cold-rolled AISI 1010 steel (UNS G10100)(1)
resistance (Rd), and breakpoint frequency. was coated with an epoxy polyamide primer coating
Tait, et al., found aerosol coating cans had (Mil-24441) by a dip application process described by
service lifetimes > 2 y when the pore resistance of the ASTM Standard D 823.11
coating was > 109 Ω-cm2 after 100 days of exposure.9 Composition of the steel was 0.08% to 0.13 %
Lifetimes were < 1 y when the corrosion resistance carbon (C), 0.3% to 0.6 % manganese (Mn), 0.04%
was < 107 Ω-cm2 within the same period.9 These phosphorus (P), and 0.05% sulfur (S). Panels first were
results were generalized for tin-free steel with an degreased in xylene. Coatings then were applied in
organic coating, coated tin-plate steel as well as 25-µm to 30-µm increments for each dip. EIS studies
organic-coated aluminum. were done for nominal coating thicknesses of 25 µm,
In agreement with Leidheiser’s review3-4 and Tait’s 55 µm, 150 µm, and 180 µm. Exposures were
findings,9 Scully found epoxy polyamide-coated steel conducted in ASTM artificial ocean water (ASTM
performed well for several years if the LF impedance Standard D 1141) at room temperature.12 Experimental
(e.g., at 1 mHz and 10 mHz) observed in the first details have been given elsewhere.7
several months was > 107 Ω-cm2.7 Composition of the Mg alloy ZE41A-T5 (UNS
While several correlations exist for barrier coatings M16410) was 3.5% to 5.0% zinc (Zn), 0.75% to 1.75%
on steel, less information is available for coated cerium (Ce), 0.4% to 1.0% zirconium (Zr), 0.15% Mn,
magnesium (Mg). 0.10% copper (Cu), 0.01% nickel (Ni), 0.30 total
Conversion-coated and anodized Mg alloy AZ31 others, and balance Mg.
with an epoxy coating also has been examined by The Mg alloy was chromate conversion-coated in
impedance methods.10 Samples were exposed for 60 a dichromate bath in accordance with AMS 2475E.13 A
days. LF impedance at 10 mHz of > 108 Ω-cm2 were baked-on epoxy (Araldite 961†) was applied subse-
obtained for 2 or 3 layers of an epoxy resin coating quently to 25-µm to 37-µm thicknesses. Panels then
were degreased in 1,1,1-trichloroethane. Tests were
conducted in aerated 5% sodium chloride (NaCI) at
(1)
UNS numbers are listed in Metals and Alloys in the Unified Numbering room temperature.
System, published by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) and
cosponsored by ASTM. A subset of the total population of replicate panels
†
Trade name. was treated in boiling oil (Canadian Exxon 2380†), at
Experimental Methods
EIS data were collected over a frequency range of
1 mHz or 10 mHz to 65 kHz or 100 kHz. Spectra were
acquired at selected times during the exposure period.
(b)
Earlier steel work was performed using either a B.C.
1200† potentiostat and Solartron 1250† frequency FIGURE 1. Electrical equivalent circuit models describing
response analyzer (FRA).7 Coated Mg was investi- coated metal systems: (a) defect-free coating and (b) organic
gated using either a Princeton Applied Research 273A† coating containing defects. (Rt = charge transfer resistance
potentiostat with a 5310† lock-in analyzer, or a PAR associated with corrosion at exposed metal sites).
273A† potentiostat/Solartron 1255† FRA. Data
acquisition was achieved using internal software7 in the
former case and either the PAR 388† software or
ZPLOT† in the latter. A three-electrode electrochemical Data Analysis
configuration was used with a clamp-on electrolyte cell The equivalent electrical circuit models in Figures
attached by a rubber O-ring. A 13-cm2 test area was 1(a) and (b) were used for coated steel and Mg.
used for steel specimens. A 10-cm2 test area was used For the coated Mg system, the EIS circuit
for coated Mg. A silver-silver chloride (Ag-AgCI) parameters associated with Figure 1 were determined
reference electrode exposed to the NaCI solution was with a commercially available software. Capacitances
used in both cases, along with a platinized mesh were modeled either as ideal capacitors (C) such that
counter electrode. the admittance = jC, where is the frequency in
Experiments were conducted at the open-circuit rad/s, j = [–1]1/2, or as constant-phase elements
potential (OCP). OCP obtained for the uncoated alloys (admittance = jnYo where 0 < n < 1 and Yo is a
was applied potentiostatically in cases where coatings parameter describing the apparent capacitance.
of high integrity made determination of a stable OCP Circuit parameters were determined by a nonlinear
difficult. In the case of AISI 1010 steel, OCP of the least-squares fitting analysis procedure.
bare steel was –0.6 to –0.7 VAg-AgCI. In the case of the For coated steel, impedance parameters were
Mg alloy, the chromate conversion-coated OCP was obtained using an iterative procedure whereby the
≈ –1.6 VAg-AgCI. Alternating current (AC) amplitudes of synthetic spectra for selected impedance parameters
10 mV were applied. For high-quality coatings, this were compared to experimental spectra and updated
amplitude was increased to 100 mV or 300 mV to until a good correspondence was achieved.16 In this
improve the signal-to-noise ratio. Some caution is procedure, intrinsic area-specific resistances and
warranted with the use of large amplitudes since the capacitances (coating defect [rd], corrosion charge
coating could be damaged, and nonlinearities in the transfer resistance [rt], and double-layer capacitance
EIS response might be introduced. [Cdl]) were held constant.16 The defect area (Ad) was
Panels were rated visually at various times periods varied to model the increasing coating porosity associ-
(steel) and after 120 days (Mg) using the system ated with various thicknesses of epoxy polyamide on
described by ASTM Standard D 610 for corrosion steel.16
sites14 or for blisters given by ASTM Standard D 714.15 The defect area could be estimated from the high-
However, the area scale used for D 610 also was frequency and low-frequency breakpoints (fh and fl,
applied to blisters. This scale is 9 (0.03%), 8 (0.1%), respectively), which have been defined by Hack and
7 (0.3%), 6 (1%), 5 (3%), 4 (10%), 3 (16%), 2 (33%), Scully16 and Haruyama, et al.17
and 1 (50%), where the percent in parenthesis is the fl is favored for small defect areas.16 fh and fl are
area percent corroded or blistered. linear functions of defect area over a broad range of
FIGURE 5. Bode magnitude plot showing the theoretical effect FIGURE 6. Bode phase angle plot showing the theoretical
of various percentages of defect area on the simulated effect of various percentages of defect area on the simulated
impedance behavior of a coated steel with a total area of impedance phase angle behavior of a coated steei with a total
10 cm2. Hypothetical defect areas are indicated on the plot area of 10 cm2. Hypothetical defect areas are indicated using
using both area % and the ASTM D 610 scale. both area % and the ASTM D 610 scale.
One other parameter associated with the Decrease of the LF impedance < 108 Ω-cm2 as shown
characterization of coatings by EIS should be in Figure 9 correlates well with the ability to measure
mentioned. This parameter was the LF impedance a stable OCP with a high-impedance voltmeter.
associated with the impedance plateau seen at Measurement of a stable OCP is also a qualitative
frequencies below ≈ 10 mHz in Figure 5. If this indicator of the presence of active defects. Moreover,
parameter were determined near the direct current the ability to measure a stable OCP should rely on
(DC) limit, it would become a LF resistance similar to some minimum required defect area.
the DC resistance reported in earlier studies.1 The
circuit model shown in Figure 1(b) indicates that LF EIS Characterization
impedance would be dominated by the sum Rs + Rd + of the Coated Mg Alloy
Rt as frequency approaches zero. Hence, the LF Conversion-coated Mg alloy ZE41A-T5 was tested
resistance is a combined measure of Rd and the with the 25-µm- to 37-µm-thick Araldite epoxy coatings.
corrosion resistance for conductive electrolytes. Impedance behavior was dominated by the random
FIGURE 7. Equivalent circuit component intrinsic parameter values used in Figures 5, 6, and 8.
(a) (b)
FIGURE 10. Impedance response for an low initial defect Araldite-coated Mg alloy after various exposure times
in 0.5% NaCI solution. The symbols show experimental data, and the solid line indicates the computer fit to the
model shown in Figure 1.
(a) (b)
FIGURE 11. Impedance response for a high initial defect Araldite-coated Mg alloy after various exposure times
in 0.5% NaCI solution. The symbols show experimental data, and the solid line indicates the computer fit to the
model shown in Figure 1.
Results were presented for the entire population of to blisters to give the D 714 rating. Electrochemically
coated Mg alloy panels after exposure for 120 days. corroded areas somewhat underestimated the visual
EIS data was acquired at 120 days for active-area D 610 ratings (Figure 14), especially when the visual
determination, and panels were removed immediately rating was < 4, but qualitatively followed visual
and rated visually. Each solid circle represents such a assessments. This underestimation may have resulted
data pair. The dotted line indicates the corroded area from inaccuracies in the assumed value of Cdl that
prescribed by the numerical rating system given by the were used to calculate the active area, from the fact
D 610 standard. The same size index also was applied that all corroded sites detected visually were not active
parameter would forecast the long-term performance liable to fail (2 of 4 replicate panels failed, while 1 had
even if determined very early in the exposure period. a rating of 6). For the coated Mg alloy with a LF
Coating performance was forecast using impedance resistance > 4 x 108 Ω-cm2 at 65 days, only 1 of 3
parameters determined as early as 14 days in the case panels approached failure with a 120-day rating of 6.
of coated steel.7 However, to minimize uncertainty Hence, the threshold LF resistance for the Araldite-
about the issue of minimum exposure time, a uniform coated Mg alloy clearly was ≥ 109 Ω-cm2. Exposure for
time period of 65 days was selected. Impedance > 120 days may have resulted in the need for an even
parameters determined at this time were compared to higher impedance to avoid failure. An exact value
visual ratings obtained later. could not be proposed at this time because of an
To resolve whether the threshold impedance inadequate data set for statistical analysis.
magnitude which signals coating failure at some later Figure 18 shows the relationship between Rd at
time was the same for coated steel and the Mg alloy, 65 days and the D 610 visual rating after 120 days for
impedance parameters obtained at 65 days exposure both epoxy polyamide-coated steel and Araldite-coated
were compared to the visual appearance after 120 Mg alloy. Steel specimens with Rd < ≈ 104 Ω-cm2 at
days for both systems. Impedance parameters 65 days met the failure criterion. Steel specimens with
examined included the LF impedance, Rd, fl, fh, and fmin. Rd < 3 x 105 Ω-cm2 (65 days) met the same failure
Panels were rated visually at 120 days according to criterion after 600 days of exposure. However, any
ASTM standard D 610. An ASTM D 610 rating of 5 coated steel specimens with Rd > 106 Ω-cm2 survived
(3% corroded area) was defined arbitrarily as coating for 600 days exposure in ASTM ocean water without
failure for the purpose of this comparison. failure. Hence, the threshold Rd for epoxy polyamide-
Figure 16 shows the relationship between LF coated steel was ≈ 106 Ω-cm2 to 107 Ω-cm2 given the
impedance at 65 days and the D 610 visual rating after failure criterion chosen here. This also was consistent
120 days for both epoxy polyamide-coated steel and with former criteria. In the case of coated Mg,
Araldite-coated Mg alloy. Steel specimens with a LF specimens with a 65-day Rd < ≈ 108 Ω-cm2 were likely
resistance < ≈ 105 Ω-cm2 at 65 days met the failure to fail (2 of 6 replicate panels failed, while 2 had a
criterion. Steel specimens with a LF resistance < 5 x rating of 6, or were near failure). Moreover, 3 of 3
105 Ω-cm2 in 65 days met the same failure criterion in coated Mg panels with Rd > 108 Ω-cm2 did not fail in the
600 days (Figure 17). However, any coated steel 120-day period. A Rd threshold of ~ 109 Ω-cm2 was
specimens with a LF resistance > 106 Ω-cm2 survived suggested by these results for the coated Mg system.
for 600 days without failure. This was similar to the A similar trend was observed with regard to the
older resistance criterion of 107 Ω-cm2.3-4,9 Hence, the breakpoint and saddle frequencies. A breakpoint
threshold LF resistance for steel was ≈ 106 Ω-cm2 to frequency > 104 Hz signaled imminent coating failure
107 Ω-cm2 for the failure criterion arbitrarily chosen for the steel, while any significant separation of time
here. In the case of the coated Mg alloy, specimens constants at all so that fmin and ⌽min emerged including
with a 65-day LF resistance ≤ 4 x 108 Ω-cm2 were fmin > 102 Hz signaled failure for the Mg alloy.
FIGURE 17. Correlation between ASTM D 610 rating at 600 FIGURE 18. Correlation between ASTM D 610 rating at 120
days and LF impedance after 65 days exposure time for epoxy days and Rd after 65 days exposure time for an Araldite-coated
polyamide-coated steel. Mg alloy and epoxy polyamide-coated steel.
It was clear from these results that more corrode at several hundred times that rate in seawater,
conservative threshold impedance values would be mainly as a result of alloy impurities such as iron (Fe)
required for coated Mg compared to coated steel to that facilitate the cathodic reduction of water reaction
assure with any confidence a certain level of perform- at a high rate.21 A polarization resistance value (Rp) of
ance after a certain period of time. Therefore, caution 30 Ω-cm2 was obtained for the bare Mg alloy
is required concerning the universal applicability of any investigated here, while several hundred Ω-cm2
single threshold impedance value determined from a typically is obtained for steel in aerated NaCI solution.
certain coating-metal system. For instance, a DC Moreover, corrosion of steels in NaCI of neutral pH is
resistance value > 107 Ω-cm2 generally is viewed as controlled by the O2 reduction reaction.
indicative of a good organic coating. Such a guideline It is reasonable to expect that O2 transport is
clearly may not apply to all alloys, coating systems, or mass transport-controlled at small coating defects and
preparation procedures other than the ones actually that this reactant may be depleted readily at corroded
tested. A more conservative criterion perhaps should sites. In the case of delamination or blistering of
be applied to coated Mg alloys. coatings on steel, O2 must be transported relatively
long distances parallel to the metal surface through the
Differences Between electrolyte to the delamination front. Alternatively, O2
Coated Mg and Steel must be transported through the organic coating
Although the existence of different impedance perpendicular to the steel surface to reach the
threshold values was not surprising, the exact reason delamination front at much lower transport rates
was unclear. In the case of the comparison conducted through the polymer.7 In contrast, the primary cathodic
here, it was unlikely that the differences in performance reaction in the case of Mg is the reduction of water.
related to the differences in coating thicknesses (20 µm This reaction is charge transfer-controlled in aqueous
to 37 µm for Mg as compared to 25 µm to 155 µm for NaCI solutions. Moreover, residual alloying impurities
steel). For Mg, 20 µm to 37 µm has been shown to such as Ni, Fe, and Cu accelerate the corrosion of
provide excellent corrosion resistance when free of Mg.22 It is believed that these alloying elements
defects.10 Four of 10 Araldite-coated Mg specimens catalyze the reduction of water reaction, which leads to
survived the 120-day test period with a perfect hydroxyl ion production. Since this reaction is not mass
ASTM D 610 rating of 10, implying that the coating transport limited in aqueous solutions, corrosion of Mg
thickness in and of itself was not the cause. Rather, the alloys may proceed rapidly at very small coating
differences between coated steel and Mg reported defects. This may lead to rapid disbondment by both
here more likely reflected the differences in corrosion corrosion product wedging as well as hydroxyl ion
rate and controlling factors in the corrosion processes production. In comparing steel to Mg from the stand-
for steel relative to Mg alloys in NaCI solutions. point of hydroxyl ion production, an interfacial potential
The literature reports a corrosion rate of steel in equal to OCP for Mg in salt water would be analogous
seawater of ~ 4 mpy.21 Commercial Mg alloys can to polarizing steel to –1.57 VAg-AgCI, not accounting for
possible differences in water reduction exchange failure criterion chosen here. Results indicated a more
current densities. Coated steel at –1.57 VAg-AgCI would conservative impedance-based failure threshold may
have to be compared to coated Mg to obtain roughly be necessary for more electrochemically “active”
similar hydroxyl ion production rates and thereby materials such as Mg-based alloys compared to those
complete this comparison. currently envisioned for steels. However, results
The fact that high initial impedance values were showed excellent corrosion performance is possible for
required to insure good 120-day performance for the coated Mg as long as coating defects are minimized
Mg alloy implied that only the smallest of defect sites, and high impedance values indicative of good barrier
which presumably could be plugged with corrosion qualities are maintained above such definable failure
products, could be tolerated in the case of coated Mg. thresholds.
In fact, differences in oxide solubility also might explain
the inability of Mg to tolerate coating defects. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Magnesium hydroxide (Mg[OH]2) is considerably more
soluble than ferrous hydroxide (Fe[OH]2) at an The authors acknowledge the assistance of
equivalent pH,23 rendering the “deactivation” of small CDNSWC-Annapolis Division (formerly David Taylor
active sites by corrosion product precipitation more Research Center), H. Hack, Pratt & Whitney Aircraft
difficult in the former case. The hydroxyl ion production Co. of Canada, S. Yousri, and the Virginia Center for
rate, greater solubility of corrosion products, and the Electrochemical Sciences and Engineering. J.R. Scully
high oxidation rate of Mg all contribute to an inability to was supported partially by the National Science
tolerate larger natural defects. This discussion is Foundation under contract DMR-9357463.
supported by the results since a ≥ 3% corroded area
often resulted in complete perforation of the Mg alloy REFERENCES
substrate (> 0.2 cm thick) in as few as 20 days. Hence,
1. R.C. Bacon, J.J. Smith, F.M. Rugg, Ind. Chem. 40 (1948): p. 161.
successful use of coated Mg alloys requires a high- 2. J.E.O. Mayne, “Mechanisms of the Protective Action of Paints,” in
integrity coating that minimizes defects. Corrosion, ed. L.L. Shrier (London, England: Butterworth, 1977).
3. H. Leidheiser Jr., Progr. Org. Coatings 7 (1979): p. 79.
4. H. Leidheiser Jr., J. Coatings Technol. 63, 802 (1991): p. 21-31.
CONCLUSIONS 5. M. Kendig, F. Mansfeld, S. Tsai, Corros. Sci. 23, 4 (1983): p. 317.
6. F. Mansfeld, S. Jeanjaquet, M. Kendig, Corros. Sci. 26, 9 (1986): p. 735.
7. J.R. Scully, J. Electrochem. Soc. 136, 4 (1989): p. 979.
❖ Results demonstrated the utility of EIS as well as 8. M.W. Kendig, J.R. Scully, Corrosion 46, 1 (1990): p. 22.
similar electrical equivalent circuit models for 9. W.S. Tait, K.A. Handrich, S.W. Tait, J.W. Martin, “Analyzing and
Interpreting Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy Data from
evaluating the corrosion performance of barrier-type Internally Coated Steel Aerosol Containers,” in Electrochemical
coatings on steel and Mg alloy ZE41A-T5 in NaCl Impedance: Analysis and Interpretation, ASTM STP 1188, eds. J.R.
Scully, D.C. Silverman, M.W. Kendig (Philadelphia, PA: ASTM, 1993),
solutions. p. 428-437.
❖ Impedance parameters that were most capable of 10. F. Mansfeld, S. Kim, S. Lin, J. Coatings Technol. 61 (1989): p. 33.
11. ASTM Standard D 823, “Standard Method of Producing Films of Uniform
forecasting long-term visually based performance of Thickness of Paint, Varnish, and Related Products on Test Panels,”
coatings included LF impedance (≤ 10 mHz, 10 cm2 ASTM Annual Book of Standards, Vol. 06.01 (1986), p. 140.
area), Rd, fl, fh, and fmin. Electrical equivalent circuit 12. ASTM Standard D 1141, “Standard Specification for Substitute Ocean
Water,” ASTM Annual Book of Standards, Vol.11.02 (1990), p. 423.
analysis was required to extract some of these 13. “Protective Treatments — Magnesium Alloys,” Aerospace Materials
parameters from the raw EIS spectra. However, Specification 2475E (Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers,
1994).
simplistic analysis of EIS data also was useful. For 14. ASTM Standard D 610, “Standard Method of Evaluating Degree of
instance, the easily determined LF impedance was a Rusting on Painted Steel Surfaces,” ASTM Annual Book of Standards,
Vol. 06.01 (1986), p. 98.
measure of the combined sum of Rd, Rt, and Rs. This 15. ASTM Standard D 714, “Standard Method of Evaluating Degree of
parameter was a simple and effective measure of Rusting on Painted Steel Surfaces,” ASTM Annual Book of Standards,
Vol. 06.01 (1986), p. 124.
multiple aspects related to the corrosion performance 16. H.P. Hack, J.R. Scully, J. Electrochem. Soc. 138, 1 (1991): p. 33.
of the coated metal system. 17. S. Haruyama, M. Asari, T. Tsuru, “Impedance Characteristics During
❖ Comparison of coated metal OCP values to those of Degradation of Coated Steel,” in Corrosion Protection by Organic
Coatings, ECS PV-87-2, eds. M. Kendig, H. Leidheiser Jr. (Pennington,
bare metals also provided a qualitative indication of NJ: The Electrochemical Society, 1987), p. 197.
corrosion that complemented EIS-derived parameters. 18. F. Mansfeld, C.H. Tsai, Corrosion 47 (1991): p. 958.
19. M. Kendig, F. Mansfeld, Corrosion 47 (1991): p. 964.
❖ A threshold LF resistance value of 108 Ω-cm2 to 20. J.N. Murray, H.P. Hack, Corrosion 47 (1991): p. 480.
109 Ω-cm2 at 65 days forecasted failure when defined 21. Seawater Corrosion Handbook, ed. M. Schumacher (Park Ridge, NJ:
Noyes Data Corp.,1979), pp. 10-26 and 72-73.
by a 3% visually detected defect area after 120 days 22. J.E. Hillis, “The Effect of Heavy Metal Contamination on Magnesium
for an Araldite-coated Mg alloy ZE41A-T5. For epoxy Corrosion Performance,” SAE Technical Paper 830523 (Warrendale PA:
polyamide-coated steel, a lower threshold LF The Society of Automotive Engineers, 1983).
23. M. Pourbaix, Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions
resistance of 107 Ω-cm2 forecasted failure using the (Houston TX: NACE, 1974).