Astm e 112 Ebook - en
Astm e 112 Ebook - en
Astm e 112 Ebook - en
GRAIN SIZE
ASTM E 112
A STEP BY STEP GUIDE for getting
fast and accurate results
using an Image Analysis Software.
A Publication of
Table of
Contents
Introduction
Chapter 8 – Conclusion
References
INTRODUCTION
What metallurgist must know about Grain Size.
So let´s start…
1
CHAPTER ONE
Uunderstanding
grain size geometry
Grain size geometry
“Shapes must be space filling.” Plateu 1873
What is a grain?
This is the first question that comes to our mind and the answer is
quite simple:
Tetrakaidecahedron: Dodecahedron
14 faces 12 faces
GRAIN SIZE GEOMETRY
What does it mean ?
It means that a geometry body to be considered as a grain, it must
comply with the following requirements:
As you can see in figure A), there are a group of individual grains,
and because of their geometry, it can be joint to become a bigger
particle.
So a metal structure is formed by grains.
Figure A)
Why geometry is important?
Top 3 Measurement
methods
TOP 3
Definition of ASTM GRAIN SIZE
To make it easier, here is a table with a Grain size number and the
number of grains / in2 at 100X
G n G n
1 1 6 32
2 2 7 64
3 4 8 128
4 8 9 256
5 16 10 512
TOP 3
Definition of ASTM GRAIN SIZE
1. Comparison charts.
2. Jeffries Planimetric Grain Size.
3. Heyn / Hilliard / Abrams Intercept method.
We will explain in detail how to measure the grain size in the next
chapters, but before measuring you have to be sure if the
equipment available in the lab can help you or not.
Because you need to prepare the sample and then analyze it.
Keep reading…
TOP 3
Definition of ASTM GRAIN SIZE
Also make sure that the microscope can allows you to place a
reticle on the eyepieces, or there are some brands and models that
you can install a grain size chart between the light path , so you an
see the grain size image on the eyepiece and then you can compare
it with your sample.
With different type of reticles you can measure manually all the 3
methods.
Inverted microscope
– Reflected Light
Comparison Method
The most simple and easy way to measure the average grain size,
is using the comparison charts.
You only have to look on the eyepiece and compare the image you
see there with the standard charts, that´s it.
You can also use the grain size reticle on the eyepiece to have a
more accurate comparison, because the grain size standard charts
are printed in the reticle, and you can compare it while observing
on the eyepiece.
Is fast and easy, but is only for the average grain size, not for
individual grains.
Top 3
Comparison charts – Planimetric - Interception
But you have to define if you are going to measure the grains
intercepted or the intersections of the grain boundaries.
3
CHAPTER THREE
Comparison method
Comparison method
Method #1
And is even more subjective when the grains are smaller and there
are slight differences in size .
Imagine a structure where there are 55% of grains are size 8 and
45% are 7, complicated right?
Jeffries Planimetric
method
Jeffries Planimetric method
Method #2
With this method you can get the grain size number in 2 steps.
N A = f ( N1 + ( N2 / 2))
f = Jeffries multiplier ; f = Mag 2/ circle area
N1= Number of grains completely inside the circle.
N2= Number of grains intercepting the circle.
Jeffries Planimetric method
Method #2
Step # 2
You can know the grain size number in two ways:
1. After calculating the NA number, you can go to the table 6
from ASTM E 112 standard and cross the NA number with the
Grain size number. For this case the G is 2.5.
2. Or you can calculate it, using the following formulas:
G = 2.5
G= 2.5
5
CHAPTER FIVE
NL= N / Lt
Or you can use this formula if you want to calculate the grain size
counting boundary intersections.
PL= P / Lt
This example has 5 Intercepted grains + 2 half at the ends this give
us a total of 6 grains.
Intercept method
Method #3
l = 1/ NL = 1/ PL
Intercept method
Method #3
Lt= 11.4 mm
N= 41 + 25 + 20 = 86
NL= 86 / 11.4 = 7.54 mm-1
l= 1/7.54 = 0.133 mm
G= [6.643856 Log10 (0.133 )]-3.288
G= 2.5
We can conclude that the Interception and planimetric
methods are reliable and widely used, but present
difficulties because is very tedious to get the result and it is
more complicated if more area is required.
Automatic Measurement
using an Image Analyzer
Automatic Measurement
Easier, faster and reliable
Below is the list of the “must know” principles for any Image
Analysis System, please take your time to see the videos, we will
use that information for the excercise.
(To see the videos please click on the links)
Now you know the principles, you are ready to discover how to
measure Grain Size automatically.
Imagine that you have a nice sample and your system is properly
setup and calibrated.
You only have to select and detect the grain boundary and allow
the system does all the work, this will be done in seconds.
Click here to see it in action.
The nex question is, What about the structures like the
picture below? Does the system Works the same way?
No, it does not work in the same way, because the binarization is
not accurate with the structure above.
For cases like this, you can use the Intercept method with the
digital tools of the System. Click here to see it in action.
Automatic Measurement
Easier, faster and reliable
If you want to reach the highest accuracy, you will need 60 fields.
Not easy to do it manually.
7
CHAPTER SEVEN
After calculating the CI, you can now calculate the % of R.A.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Relative accuracy and Confidence Interval
After all this chapters, you can now be sure what is necessary to
do, to perform a profesional measurement for grain size.
The use of the image analysis systems makes your work easier, but
is necessary you understand how it Works and how to adjust it to
get objective Results.
Also, with this guide you know now , how many fields are required
to analyze in order to get a 10% of RA or less.
Disclaimer:
This document can not be used for legal or comercial disputes, and any posible injury, damage to personel
or facilities due to the interpretation of this information ,is under user responsability only.
REFERENCES
Special thanks
We want to thank to George Vander Voort, for sharing
his knowledge for so many years.
My comments are…
www.ingintegral.com