Assignment 5 - Pool Fire - s2020027
Assignment 5 - Pool Fire - s2020027
A hydrocarbon liquid with a high molecular weight is released from confinement at the
volumetric rate of 0.12 m3/s. A bund wall of 27 m diameter exist to constrain the spill. If the
liquid caught fire, estimate the heat flux to a person standing at a distance of 55 m from the
bund wall. Assume that there is no wind and the relative humidity is 80%. Estimate the
heat flux using the point source radiation model as well as the solid plume radiation model.
Given data:
- Heat of combustion of the liquid: 44,700 kJ/kg
- Heat of vaporisation at ambient temperature: 320 kJ/kg
- Liquid boiling point: 375 K = 101.85°C
- Density of liquid: 760 kg/m3
- Heat capacity of liquid (constant): 2.8 kJ/kg °C
- Ambient temperature: 303 K = 29.85°C
Answer Script
Heat of vaporisation modified at the liquid boiling point:
T BP
o
Δ H =Δ H v + ∫ C p dT
Ta
o
101.85 C
kJ kJ kJ kJ
o
(
Δ H = 320 )
+ ∫ 2.8
kg 29.85 C kg
dT = 320
o kg ( ) (
+2.8 (101.85−29.85)
kg )
kJ
Δ H o=521.6
kg
Vertical Burning Rate:
Δ Hc
ẏ max =1.27 ×10
−6
ΔH
o
−6
=1.27 × 10 ( 44700
521.6 )
m B =0.0828 kg /m2 s
V̇ L 0.12m 3 /s
D max =2
√ √
π ẏ
=2
π (1.089 ×10−4 m/s)
=37.457 m
Since this is larger than the diameter of the diked area, the pool will be constrained by the dike
with a diameter of 27 m. The area of the pool is:
2
π D 2 π ( 27 )
A= = =572.2 m2
4 4
Given that :
(( )
0.61
H mB m2 s
D
=42
(
ρa √ gD ) =42
kg m
=1. 499
1.2 3
m ) √( )
9.81 2 ( 27 m )
s
Thus,
H
H= × D=( 1.499 ) ( 27 m )=40.473 m
D
Point Source Model
Transmissivity:
−0.09
N
τ a=2.02 ( Pw X s )−0.09
[( )
=2.02 3395 2 ( 71.427 m )
m ] =0.662
Thermal flux with conservative value 0.4 for the fraction of the energy converted to
radiation,
¿ 68.5
∴ Dimensionless Distance ¿ Flame Axis=Distance¿ Flame Axis = m=5.07
Pool Radius 13.5
By referring to Figure 3.33 the Maximum view factor = 0.06
Atmospheric transmissivity:
−0.09
N
−0.09
τ a=2.02 ( Pw X s )
[( )
=2.02 3395 2 ( 55 m )
m ] =0.678
Radiant Flux:
kW kW
(
Er =τ a E av F21=( 0.678 ) 24.7
m 2)( 0.06 ) =1.005 2
m
The result from the solid plume radiation model is smaller than the point source model.
This is most likely due to consideration of the radiation obscuration by the flame soot, a
feature not treated directly by the point source model. The differences between the two
models might be greater at closer distance to the pool fire.