72 - Motion To Compel Seago Testimony

Case 1:21-cr-00582-CRC Document 72 Filed 04/19/22 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : EX PARTE AND UNDER SEAL

:
v. : Criminal Case No. 21-582 (CRC)
:
MICHAEL A. SUSSMANN, :
:
Defendant. :
MOTION TO SEAL
The United States of America, by and through Special Counsel John H. Durham
respectfully moves this Court to place under seal, until further notice of the Court, the
Government’s Ex Parte Application for a Court Order to Compel Testimony from Laura Seago,
the Court’s Order to Compel, the Motion to Seal, and the Court’s Order to Seal. As the Court is
aware, this case has garnered significant media interest. The pre-trial disclosure of Ms. Seago as
an immunized witness could subject Ms. Seago and her family to undue harassment and endanger
their physical safety.
Respectfully submitted,
JOHN H. DURHAM
Special Counsel
By:
/s/ Jonathan E. Algor

Jonathan E. Algor
Andrew DeFilippis
Michael T. Keilty
Brittain Shaw
Assistant Special Counsels
145 N Street, NE
Room 3E.803
Washington, DC 20530
Case 1:21-cr-00582-CRC Document 72-1 Filed 04/19/22 Page 1 of 5


:
:
:
Defendant. :
UNITED STATES’ EX PARTE APPLICATION

TO COMPEL TESTIMONY FROM LAURA SEAGO
The United States of America, by and through Special Counsel John H. Durham,
respectfully requests that this Court, pursuant to the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 6001 et seq., enter
an order directing Laura Seago to testify at the above-captioned trial. A proposed order is attached.
In support of this request, the Government states the following:
1. On or about March 15, 2022, the Government served a subpoena for Ms. Seago to
appear and give testimony in the above-captioned trial.
2. Ms. Seago is represented by Holly Pierson, Esq who informed the Government
that her client will invoke her Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination absent a
court order of immunity compelling her to testify at trial.
3. Accordingly, the Special Counsel is applying for an order compelling Ms. Seago
to testify in the above-captioned trial. The statutory scheme for such an application is found at
18 U.S.C. §§ 6001–6005. Under this statute, when a United States Attorney believes that a
witness’s testimony or information that may be necessary to the public interest is likely to be
withheld under an assertion of the privilege against self-incrimination, he or she may, with the
approval of the Attorney General (or one of the authorized designees), apply to a district court
for an order compelling the witness to testify or to provide other information. See id. § 6003(b);
In re Sealed Case, 791 F.2d 179, 181 (D.C. Cir. 1986). Upon such application, the statute
provides that the court “shall issue . . . an order requiring” the witness to testify or provide other
information which she refuses to give because of her privilege against self-incrimination. 18
U.S.C. § 6003(a) (emphasis added). See also id. (“district courts are without discretion to deny a
request by a United States Attorney for an order compelling testimony as long as that request
complies with the jurisdictional and procedural requirements of the law.”).
4. The statute further provides that no testimony or other information so compelled
(or any information directly or indirectly derived from such testimony or other information) may
be used against the witness in any criminal case, except a prosecution for perjury, giving a false
statement, or otherwise failing to comply with the order. See id. § 6002. Considering that the
immunity provided under the statute is coextensive with the privilege against self-incrimination,
the Supreme Court and Courts of Appeals have repeatedly instructed that the immunity provided
in Section 6002 provides full constitutional protection for witnesses and therefore leaves them no
alternative but to testify. See In re Sealed Case, 791 F.2d at 181 (citing Kastigar v. United
States, 406 U.S. 441, 453 (1972)) (other citations omitted). Given such precedent and the
wording of the statute, “district courts are without discretion to deny a request by a United States
Attorney for an order compelling testimony as long as that request complies with the
jurisdictional and procedural requirements of the law.” Id. (citations omitted).
8. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 6003(b)(2), it is the judgment of the Special
Counsel that Ms. Seago has refused or is likely to refuse to testify or provide other information on
the basis of her claimed privilege against self-incrimination. In accordance with 18 U.S.C.
§ 6003(b)(1), it is the judgment of the Special Counsel that the testimony or other information
from Ms. Seago is necessary to the public interest. The Special Counsel represents that this
application has been approved by Deputy Assistant Attorney General Jennifer A.H. Hodge of the
Department of Justice’s Criminal Division, pursuant to the authority vested by 18 U.S.C. § 6003
and 28 C.F.R. § 0.175(a).
WHEREFORE, the United States of America respectfully requests that the Court order Ms.
Seago to give testimony or provide other information which she refuses to give or to provide on
the basis of her privilege against self-incrimination as to all matters about which she might be
interrogated at trial in the above-captioned trial; and that no testimony or other information
compelled under the order (or any information directly or indirectly derived from such testimony
or other information) may be used against Ms. Seago in any criminal case except a prosecution for
perjury, giving a false statement, or otherwise failing to comply with the order.
Respectfully submitted,
JOHN H. DURHAM
Special Counsel
By:
/s/ Brittain Shaw

Jonathan E. Algor
Andrew DeFilippis
Michael T. Keilty
Brittain Shaw
Assistant Special Counsels
145 N Street, NE
Room 3E.803
Washington, DC 20530
April 19, 2022



:
:
:
Defendant. :
ORDER
On application of the Special Counsel requesting that the Court issue an Order pursuant
to the provisions of Title 18, United States Code § 6001, et. seq., compelling testimony;
And it appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that:
1. The United States wishes to call Laura Seago as a witness in the above-captioned trial;
2. In the judgment of the Special Counsel, Ms. Seago has refused or is likely to refuse to
testify or provide other information on the basis of her privilege against self-incrimination;
3. In the judgment of the Special Counsel, the testimony or other information from Ms. Seago
may be necessary to the public interest; and
4. The aforesaid application filed herein has been made with the approval of Deputy Assistant
Attorney General Jennifer A.H. Hodge of the Department of Justice’s Criminal Division, pursuant
to the authority vested by 18 U.S.C. § 6003 and 28 C.F.R. § 0.175(a).
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 6002:
THAT the witness, Laura Seago, give testimony or provide other information which she
refuses to give or to provide on the basis of her privilege against self-incrimination as to all matters
about which she might be interrogated at trial and any proceedings ancillary thereto;
THAT no testimony or other information compelled under this Order (or any information
directly or indirectly derived from such testimony or other information) may be used against Laura
Seago in any criminal case, except a prosecution for perjury, giving a false statement, or otherwise
failing to comply with this Order;
THAT the government’s Ex Parte Application for a Court Order to Compel Testimony
from Laura Seago and this Order shall be sealed by the Clerk of the Court until further order of
this Court, except that the Government may disclose the existence and/or contents of this Order to
Laura Seago and her counsel;
THAT the Clerk of the Court shall provide to the Special Counsel’s Office certified copies
of this Order upon request.
SO ORDERED.
_______________________________
CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER
United States District Judge
District of Columbia
Dated: April ____, 2022

72 - Motion To Compel Seago Testimony

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

72 - Motion To Compel Seago Testimony

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

72 - Motion To Compel Seago Testimony

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the case about?

What is the case about?

What is the purpose of the motion to seal?

What is the purpose of the motion to seal?

Case 1:21-cr-00582-CRC Document 72 Filed 04/19/22 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : EX PARTE AND UNDER SEAL

their physical safety.

/s/ Jonathan E. Algor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : EX PARTE AND UNDER SEAL

UNITED STATES’ EX PARTE APPLICATION

In support of this request, the Government states the following:

appear and give testimony in the above-captioned trial.

court order of immunity compelling her to testify at trial.

complies with the jurisdictional and procedural requirements of the law.”).

4. The statute further provides that no testimony or other information so compelled

jurisdictional and procedural requirements of the law.” Id. (citations omitted).

8. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 6003(b)(2), it is the judgment of the Special

and 28 C.F.R. § 0.175(a).

/s/ Brittain Shaw

April 19, 2022

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : EX PARTE AND UNDER SEAL

And it appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that:

may be necessary to the public interest; and

to the authority vested by 18 U.S.C. § 6003 and 28 C.F.R. § 0.175(a).

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 6002:

failing to comply with this Order;

Laura Seago and her counsel;

of this Order upon request.

Dated: April ____, 2022

You might also like