EPC TUBAN JETTY UPGRADE AND ITS ANCILLARY

PRODUCTION & TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES PROJECT

EVALUATION & JUSTIFICATION OF PDA & PIT TEST AT CLINKER

Document No: Page
SILO
TPJC-TQ1-GN-C0-GN0-GN00-017 1 of 10

EVALUATION & JUSTIFICATION OF PDA & PIT TEST AT CLINKER SILO

0 23/08/2022 IFA DNR DNR TK

Prepared Reviewed Approved

REV DATE DESCRIPTION
CONTRACTOR
 EPC TUBAN JETTY UPGRADE AND ITS
ANCILLARY
PRODUCTION & TRANSPORTATION
FACILITIES PROJECT

Contractor Document No: EVALUATION & JUSTIFICATION OF Page No:

TPJC-TQ1-GN-C0-GN0-GN00-017 PDA & PIT TEST AT CLINKER SILO 2 of 11

REVISION HISTORICAL SHEET

Page/
Rev Item Description of Change
Paragraph
 EPC TUBAN JETTY UPGRADE AND ITS
ANCILLARY
PRODUCTION & TRANSPORTATION
FACILITIES PROJECT

Contractor Document No: EVALUATION & JUSTIFICATION OF Page No:

TPJC-TQ1-GN-C0-GN0-GN00-017 PDA & PIT TEST AT CLINKER SILO 3 of 11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. GENERAL .................................................................................................................................................. 4
2. RESULT OF PDA & PIT TEST ........................................................................................................................ 5
2.1 PDA Test ............................................................................................................................................ 5
2.2 PIT Test ............................................................................................................................................. 6
3. JUSTIFICATION OF THE RESULT WITH DESIGN / CAPACITY PILE .................................................................... 7
 EPC TUBAN JETTY UPGRADE AND ITS
ANCILLARY
PRODUCTION & TRANSPORTATION
FACILITIES PROJECT

Contractor Document No: EVALUATION & JUSTIFICATION OF Page No:

TPJC-TQ1-GN-C0-GN0-GN00-017 PDA & PIT TEST AT CLINKER SILO 4 of 11

1. GENERAL

Bored pile, also called drilled shaft, is a type of reinforced-concrete foundation that supports structures with
heavy vertical loads. A bored pile is a cast-in-place concrete pile, meaning the pile is cast on the construction
site. This differs from other concrete pile foundations, like spun pile and reinforced concrete square pile
foundations, which use precast concrete piles. Bored piling is commonly used for bridge work, tall buildings,
and massive industrial complexes, all of which require deep foundations.
At the clinker area, design of bore pile using Diameter 1.2 meter, with the length of 28 meter from cutting pile.
The total of bore pile is 109 Point.

PDA Test
Dynamic Load Testing or PDA testing, evaluating foundation bearing capacity. In addition to bearing
capacity, Dynamic Load Testing provides information on resistance distribution (shaft resistance and end
bearing) and evaluates the shape and integrity of the foundation element.
Dynamic Load Tests are standardized by ASTM D4945-12 Standard Test Method for High-Strain Dynamic
Testing of Piles.
The ultimate bearing capacity for Clinker Area with permanent and temporary condition can refer to below
table.

Allowable Compression (Ton)

Ultimate
Temporary Permanent
Compression
EQ Overstrength Cond. Static Cond. (Ton)
(SF = 1.67) (SF = 2.5)
682 456 1139
 EPC TUBAN JETTY UPGRADE AND ITS
ANCILLARY
PRODUCTION & TRANSPORTATION
FACILITIES PROJECT

Contractor Document No: EVALUATION & JUSTIFICATION OF Page No:

TPJC-TQ1-GN-C0-GN0-GN00-017 PDA & PIT TEST AT CLINKER SILO 5 of 11

2. RESULT OF PDA & PIT TEST

2.1 PDA Test

PDA Test at the clinker area conduct on August 12th 2022, and the result of PDA (Including analyse of
CAPWAP):

CAPWAP
PDA Result
No. Pile No.
(Ton) Ru (Ton) Rs (Ton) Rb (Ton)
El. Displacement Max. Displacement
1 B030F 517 617.2 219.2 397.9 9.2 9.3
2 B083F 522 620.9 349.6 271.3 5.6 5.7
3 B086F 892 884.8 502.4 381.4 10.3 14.3
4 B093F 641 702.3 356.1 346.2 7.8 10.8
5 B101F 949 912.3 673.9 238.4 5.7 6.7
6 B108F 898 887.6 618.3 269.3 5.9 6
Notes:
Ru: Ultimate
Rs: Friction
Rb: End Bearing

Mapping of PDA Test

 EPC TUBAN JETTY UPGRADE AND ITS
ANCILLARY
PRODUCTION & TRANSPORTATION
FACILITIES PROJECT

Contractor Document No: EVALUATION & JUSTIFICATION OF Page No:

TPJC-TQ1-GN-C0-GN0-GN00-017 PDA & PIT TEST AT CLINKER SILO 6 of 11

2.2 PIT Test

Test at the clinker area conduct 2 times, the first PIT on August 12th 2022, and the result is:

Pile Result
No. Classification
No. Description BTA (%)
The signal indicates there is no defect on
1 B030F 100 Undamaged
the pile with the clear toe reflection.
The signal indicates there is a minor defect
2 B083F on the pile at depth 12 m with the clear toe 96 Slightly Damaged
reflection
The signal indicates there is no defect on
3 B086F the pile but there is a potential bulging at 100 Undamaged
depth 5 m with the clear toe reflection
The signal indicates there is a minor defect
4 B093F on the top of the pile with the clear toe 90 Slightly Damaged
reflection
The signal indicates there is a minor defect
5 B101F on the pile at depth 6 m with the clear toe 85 Slightly Damaged
reflection.
The signal indicates there is no defect on
6 B108F 100 Undamaged
the pile with the clear toe reflection

Second PIT Test held on August 15th 2022, the result will be informed later.

Classification of percentage of BTA:

No. BTA (%) Classification

1 100 % Undamaged

2 80 % - 99 % Slightly Damaged

3 60 % – 79 % Undamaged

4 < 60 % Slightly Damaged

 EPC TUBAN JETTY UPGRADE AND ITS
ANCILLARY
PRODUCTION & TRANSPORTATION
FACILITIES PROJECT

Contractor Document No: EVALUATION & JUSTIFICATION OF Page No:

TPJC-TQ1-GN-C0-GN0-GN00-017 PDA & PIT TEST AT CLINKER SILO 7 of 11

Where:

100% : There is no defect on the pile

99% - 80% : There is small defect but not reduce the axial load

79% - 60% : There is defect on pile, need to repair and extra consideration if want to be used

< 60% : Pile is broken and not recommend to be use

3. JUSTIFICATION OF THE RESULT WITH DESIGN / CAPACITY PILE

Comparation Between Actual Force vs Actual PDA Test
Based on result of PDA Test on point 2.1 above, if the results are compared with the design, then the test results do not
reach the design value.

Ultimate Compression (Ton)

No. Pile No. PDA/CAPWAP Deviation (Ton) Remark
Design
Analysis
1 B030F 617.2 -521.8
2 B083F 620.9 -518.1
3 B086F 884.8 -254.2
1139
4 B093F 702.3 -436.7
5 B101F 912.3 -226.7
6 B108F 887.6 -251.4

Therefore, the comparison is made based on the actual maximum force that occurs (Vertical). To simplify the
comparation, we divide the clinker area into 4 area.
 EPC TUBAN JETTY UPGRADE AND ITS
ANCILLARY
PRODUCTION & TRANSPORTATION
FACILITIES PROJECT

Contractor Document No: EVALUATION & JUSTIFICATION OF Page No:

TPJC-TQ1-GN-C0-GN0-GN00-017 PDA & PIT TEST AT CLINKER SILO 8 of 11

Area 1

Maximum force at the area 1 is 402.77 Ton (OS Condition) and 266.98 Ton (Static Condition)

If we compare to the nearest PDA Test (assume using 2 PDA Test Result B101F & B108F), the comparation will be:

CAPWAP Ultimate Average Average Max. Force

No. Pile No. Remark
/ Ru (Ton) Ultimate (Ton) Allowable (Ton) (OS Cond.)
1 B101F 912.3
899.95 538.89 402.77
2 B108F 887.6
Using SF 1.67
Ratio pile will be 402.77/538.89= 0.74…OK

Area 2
 EPC TUBAN JETTY UPGRADE AND ITS
ANCILLARY
PRODUCTION & TRANSPORTATION
FACILITIES PROJECT

Contractor Document No: EVALUATION & JUSTIFICATION OF Page No:

TPJC-TQ1-GN-C0-GN0-GN00-017 PDA & PIT TEST AT CLINKER SILO 9 of 11

Maximum force at the area 2 is 401.87 Ton (OS Condition) and 281.23 Ton (Static Condition)

If we compare to the nearest PDA Test (assume using 3 PDA Test Result B030F, B083F & B086F), the comparation
will be:

CAPWAP Average Max. Force

Average Ultimate
No. Pile No. Ultimate / Ru Allowable Remark
(Ton)
(Ton) (Ton) (OS Cond.)
1 B030F 617.2
2 B083F 884.8 707.63 423.73 401.87
3 B086F 620.9

Ratio pile will be 401.87/423.73= 0.95…OK

Area 3

Maximum force at the area 3 is 388.49 Ton (OS Condition) and 266.27 Ton (Static Condition)

If we compare to the nearest PDA Test (assume using 2 PDA Test Result B101F & B093F), the comparation will be:

CAPWAP Ultimate Average Average Max. Force

No. Pile No. Remark
/ Ru (Ton) Ultimate (Ton) Allowable (Ton) (OS Cond.)
1 B101F 912.3
807.3 483.41 388.49
2 B093F 702.3
Using SF 1.67
Ratio pile will be 388.49/483.41 = 0.80…OK
 EPC TUBAN JETTY UPGRADE AND ITS
ANCILLARY
PRODUCTION & TRANSPORTATION
FACILITIES PROJECT

Contractor Document No: EVALUATION & JUSTIFICATION OF Page No:

TPJC-TQ1-GN-C0-GN0-GN00-017 PDA & PIT TEST AT CLINKER SILO 10 of 11

Area 4

Maximum force at the area 4 is 388.49 Ton (OS Condition) and 281.23 Ton (Static Condition)

If we compare to the nearest PDA Test (assume using 2 PDA Test Result B101F & B108F), the comparation will be:

CAPWAP Ultimate Average Average Max. Force

No. Pile No. Remark
/ Ru (Ton) Ultimate (Ton) Allowable (Ton) (OS Cond.)
1 B101F 884.8
793.55 475.18 388.49
2 B086F 702.3
Using SF 1.67
Ratio pile will be 388.49/475.18 = 0.81…OK
 EPC TUBAN JETTY UPGRADE AND ITS
ANCILLARY
PRODUCTION & TRANSPORTATION
FACILITIES PROJECT

Contractor Document No: EVALUATION & JUSTIFICATION OF Page No:

TPJC-TQ1-GN-C0-GN0-GN00-017 PDA & PIT TEST AT CLINKER SILO 11 of 11

4. CONCLUSION
Resume justification as per actual reaction vs actual PDA Test.

Max.
Nearest Ultimate Average Average
Force Pile
No. Area PDA Capacity Ultimate Allowable Result
OS Cond Ratio
Point PDA (Ton) (Ton) (Ton)
(Ton)
B101F 912.30
1 Area 1 899.95 538.89 402.77 0.75 OK
B108F 887.60
B030F 617.20
2 Area 2 B083F 620.90 707.63 423.73 401.87 0.95 OK
B086F 884.80
B101F 912.30
3 Area 3 807.30 483.41 388.49 0.80 OK
B093F 702.30
B086F 884.80
4 Area 4 793.55 475.18 388.49 0.82 OK
B093F 702.30

As per the table above, the comparison from actual reaction vs average actual PDA test shown that the pile ratio is still
under 0.
Contractor hope the information can be used and approved, and further work, such as foundation excavation, pile
cutting, and other foundation work can be started.