Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Initial Defense Letter

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

MATS COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY

College of Engineering
MATS Drive R. Castillo Agdao Davao City Philippines 8000

September 22, 2022

XXXXXXXXXX
Dean of Academic Affairs
MATS College of Technology

Dear ma’am:

This is to ask your permission to allow the aeronautical engineering instructors to conduct 4-
days Initial or Title Defense in one of the rooms available in the campus. This defense is for the forty (40)
students of Fourth Year Aeronautical Engineering as part of the requirements in Aircraft Design 1 in the
curriculum guide.

In relation to this request, we would also like to ask your approval to excuse the teachers on the
schedule attached since they will serve as the panelists for the Final Defense. Rest assured that they will
be leaving group tasks to the classes that they will miss due to the said activity.

We have attached the list of panelists, schedule and rubrics for the final defense for reference
purposes.

We are hopeful to your positive response to this request.

Thank you and God bless!

______________
Engr. Jam Cay Delfin
BSAeE Fourth Year Instructor
MATS COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY
College of Engineering
MATS Drive R. Castillo Agdao Davao City Philippines 8000

LIST OF PANELS

1st Day – Engr. Jam Cay Delfin, Engr. Joven Toriales, Engr. Gabriel Ibarra

2nd Day – Engr. Jam Cay Delfin, Engr. Joven Toriales, Engr. Kyle Morales

3rd Day – Engr. Jam Cay Delfin, Engr. Joven Toriales, Engr. Lyka Ellarina

4th Day – Engr. Jam Cay Delfin, Engr. Joven Toriales., Engr. Riyah Beray

RUBRICS

Criteria Undeveloped Developing Satisfactory Outstanding Score


Organization 0-5 points 6-10points 11-15points 15-20points
Designer is disorganized; Designer is adequately Presentation follows Designer is highly
jumped topics organized logical sequence organized, easy to follow,
smooth transitions
Delivery 0-5 points 6-10points 11-15points 15-20points
Paper was read or seemed Some parts of the In most instances, the Speech was smooth, clear
memorized. Delivery stiff presentation was presentation went and articulate. There was
and unsure delivered well, other smoothly. There were voice projection and
parts were not. minor snags in delivery pacing was effective.
Content 0-5 points 6-10points 11-15points 15-20points
Presentation was not apt to Content was adequate. Presentation was A general audience could
topic nor audience. There were attempts to sufficient. In most understand the
Background information provide background instances, the content presentation. Key terms
and/or assumptions were information. was appropriate. were defined and
lacking. background information
provided.
Media and Resources 0-5 points 6-10points 11-15points 15-20points
Media and format were There were many media Satisfactory media Excellent media format for
poor choice for content. glitches. Some slides presentation. There were content. All materials
Materials were confusing or were very distracting. however some lapses were clear and
distracting information was
pertinent.
Response to 0-5 points 6-10points 11-15points 15-20points
Questions Misunderstand questions; Some questions Designer was able to Designer was able to
cannot answer convincingly. misunderstood and answer most of the answer questions well and
There was a lot of fumbling inadequately addressed. questions well. There with reference to own
about. Designer was easily were occasions though work. Showed knowledge
rattled but managed to when designer was not of subject matter
sail through too confident about the
subject matter.
TOTAL

You might also like