Alternative Assessments
Alternative Assessments
Alternative Assessments
Alternative
Assessments
Best Practices in Alternative Assessments
A good post-secondary education facilitates numerous kinds of learning that includes acquiring factual
knowledge, professional skills, and skills of application, such as critical reflection, problem solving,
writing, conceptualizing, collaboration, creativity, civic and global learning, and reasoning. In order for
an assessment, usually in the form of an assignment or a test, to be valid, it should measure the skills
or knowledge that you have planned for your students to learn. However, many university courses still
rely heavily on a narrow range of assessment tools that typically ask students to memorize large amounts
of content without needing to apply it (Queen’s University Centre for Teaching and Learning, n.d.).
Besides providing important information to the instructor about the nature of student progress in
terms of breadth and depth of learning (Queen’s University Centre for Teaching and Learning, n.d.),
assessments can guide the way that students choose to learn. Biggs argues that what and how
students learn depends on how they think they will be assessed (1999, p. 141). This means that in most
cases, students will only focus on learning the skills that will permit them to do well in the class. If the
only forms of assessment tools used in the class are tests or exams, the student will memorize the
factual information that they need to know in order to get a good grade, forgetting much of the
factual information a week later (Mazur, 2015).
In this issue of Best Practices we will review ways that alternative assessments, also known as authentic
assessments, can be used to improve student learning.
This is where alternative assessment or authentic assessment, comes in. Authentic or alternative
assessments, meaning an alternative to standard tests and exams, provide a true evaluation of
what the student has learned, going beyond acquired knowledge to focus on what the student has
actually
learned by looking at their application of this knowledge (Indiana University, n.d.). Alternative forms of
assessment can allow you to see what student can and cannot do, versus what they do and do not
know. They tend to evaluate applied proficiency rather than measuring knowledge (Brigham Young
University, n.d.), allowing for problem solving and reflection, rather than merely providing facts as
answers to specific questions (Indiana University, n.d.).
Authentic or alternative assignments typically require students to make a judgement about what
information and skills they will need to solve a given problem. They ask students to answer essential
questions in the discipline by using knowledge in similar ways to professionals in the field. They can
often be characterized as real-world situations with accompanying real-world constraints. Alternative or
authentic assignments should involve written and performative measures so that students can
develop meaningful and applicable skills, and advance their knowledge of the “how” over that of the
“what”
(Ibid). These types of assignments are also meant to help develop disciplinary behaviors in students,
making new connections between existing skills
Letter/Letter to • Asks student to write in first person singular perspective, which can be adapted
the editor so that they are writing from the perspective of a historical or imagined individu-
al, or themselves.
• Students are asked to develop a coherent written narrative or statement for
the audience.
• Requires research, disciplinary knowledge, communication skills, and creativity.
• Can be adapted by numerous disciplines.
Memo • Students prepare a one or two page memorandum or briefing about a topic
that is being covered in class. Memo headings can include: background, problem,
solu- tions with pros and cons list, final recommendation.
• This exercise allows students to practice being concise and direct.
Presentations • Considered the most readily approachable method of authentic assessment.
• Applies positive peer pressure, as it is likely that students will be better prepared
when they have to perform before others.
• Presentations are an opportunity for the development of professional skills. Stu-
dent will need to prepare and rehearse, and develop an appropriate, polished
use of visual aids.
• Enhances professional verbal, visual, written communication skills.
• Can be easily applied to many disciplines, including the sciences.
Poster • The nature of the poster presentation can vary. It can consist of a summary
presentations of a work in progress, or a visual presentation that is equivalent to a term
paper.
• Headings to be included could be a literature review, description of topics, obser-
vations, claim/thesis, and conclusions.
• Teaches professional skills for participation in academic conferences.
Portfolio of work • Students develop portfolios in order to demonstrate the evolution of their work
over the course of the semester.
• Students are typically asked to compile their best/most representative work and
write a critical introduction and brief introduction to each piece.
Proposals • Asking students to write a proposal for a larger, more heavily weighted project
allows students to try out their ideas and set their own goals for learning
before actually carrying out their projects.
Policy briefs, • Policy briefs/reports ask students to address in a professional manner a
Reports research question, course of action, decision, or theory that is of interest and
importance. This allows students to develop professional skills and become
familiar with the specific vocabulary and style of writing in their fields.
Case studies, • Case studies present fictional scenarios that include a dilemma that
Simulations requires problem solving. Students must apply higher order thinking skills in
order to evaluate and apply knowledge, and to analyze the problem.
• Simulations ask students to play and act out various roles within a case. This
can include mock trials, mock city council or legislative meetings, and mock
meetings of corporation stockholders or school boards. In simulations,
students
require background information that they then apply to the role.
Fishbowls • The fishbowl is similar to a debate. A few students are selected to be in the “hot
seat,” where they respond to questions, concerns, ideas, about the given
topic. Other students ask questions and bring forth counter points.
• This type of exercise advances student knowledge and comprehension, as well as
improving skills in active listening, critical inquiry, professional communication,
presentation, and group discussion.
Adapted from Queen’s University Centre for Teaching and Learning Module on Assessment, and Berke-
ley Centre for Teaching and Learning’s “Alternatives to Traditional Testing.”
Alternative or authentic assessments are typically classified as formative assessments, as these assign-
ments are typically in-process evaluations of student’s understanding, learning needs, and academic
progress. Tests and exams tend to be classified as summative assessment. Summative assessments
are used to assess student learning at the end of the instructional period.
In her post for the University of Waterloo’s blog, the Chalkboard, Shannon Dea writes about the benefits
of authentic or formative assessments. She states that this approach gives you an opportunity, as an in-
structor, to see what the student is doing and how the student is doing. She states that “on this
conceptu- alization, good assessments are designed to make salient student capacities, and student
demonstration of learning outcomes, rather than to force students to cross a threshold.” Asking
students to memorize knowledge that they do not apply in any meaningful way does not assist them in
developing higher order
thinking skills. In Dea’s words, a true/false test does not give insight into how a student is doing. It just
tells you which of your students is good at true/false tests.
The chart below, adapted from the Assessment Module created by the Queens University Centre for
Teaching and Learning as part of their Teaching and Learning in Higher Education course, outlines the
benefits and limitations of formative and summative assessments.
Formative Summative
• Used throughout learning process • Used at the end of a learning process
• Provides iterative feedback • Evaluates learning against a benchmark
• Dialogue based, may be ungraded or standard
• Identifies gaps and misunderstandings in • Provides a numeric grade that summarizes
the learning process how much a student has learned
• Demonstrates evolving understanding of • Efficient to grade
a topic • No feedback on the learning process itself
• More valid than conventional tests, especially • Typically high stakes, making up a significant
for higher order thinking skills portion of the grade
• More interesting to students and thus • Information from summative assessments
more motivating can be used formatively as well, in that both
• Can assess more clearly what students students and faculty can use it to guide
have and haven’t learned their efforts moving forward
• Process can be costly in terms of time, effort,
equipment, materials, facilities, or funds.
• Rating process is sometimes more subjective
than traditional exams
Adapted from the Queen’s University Centre for Teaching and Learning Module on Assessment, and
Brigham Young University’s “Using Alternative Assessments.”
While summative evaluation is necessary and should not be disregarded, thought should be given to
how it can be used to pinpoint student weaknesses and identify ways to improve course content or
instruction (Carnegie Mellon University, n.d.). According to the Yale Centre for Teaching and Learning,
summative assessments, which are almost always formally graded and heavily weighted, should be used
in combina- tion with formative assessments. As an instructor, you can consider a variety of ways to do
this, including a combination of assignments.
Rubrics
A key to successful assessment is giving students a clear understanding of what the expectations are for
their work. This is especially important for alternative assessments. Rubrics, especially those that are
given alongside an assignment description, are a great way of guiding students towards success. They can
also be used to provide feedback to students, strengthening the formative component of any
assessment method.
What is a rubric?
Rubrics are scoring tools that describe performance expectations for students as set out by the
instructor. They can be used for all assignment types. They are usually comprised of four components:
1. A description of the assignment/assessment
2. Criteria that will be assessed
3. Descriptions of what is expected for each assignment component
4. Performance levels indicating mastering of various components. A well-designed rubric will give a
substantive description of the expected performance levels.
There are two types of rubrics: holistic and analytic.
• Holistic rubrics provide a single score rating the overall perception of the student’s performance. This
approach is especially useful when a single attribute is being examined. This type of rubric allows for
quick scoring, but no detailed feedback.
• Analytic rubrics provides scores for various criteria, gives detailed feedback, and helps to ensure that
feedback is consistently given across students.
A carefully designed rubric can offer a number of benefits to instructors and students.
Creating a Rubric
Yale University’s Center for Teaching and Learning has created a set of recommendations that you can
use in order to create an effective rubric.
• Develop a clear definition of the purpose of the assessment task, and its goals.
• Decide on whether you would like to use a holistic or analytic rubric, depending on the goals you want
to achieve.
• Define the assignment criteria. You can base these on your learning outcomes and goals as well. As
with assessment design, consider what skills and knowledge is necessary for successful completion.
• Define the scale you will use in order to measure performance. Provide a description of each level.
• Test the rubric and revise it as necessary.
For more information on designing rubrics, download our issue of Best Practices on Grading Academic
Work Using Rubrics [pdf].
Work Cited
Berkeley Center for Teaching and Learning. (2018). Alternatives to
Traditional Testing | Center for Teaching & Learning.
Retrieved from https://teaching.berkeley.edu/resources/
improve/alternatives-traditional-testing
Yale University Centre for Teaching and Learning. (n.d.). Creating and
Using Rubrics. Retrieved from https://ctl.yale.edu/Rubrics
Prepared by Paulina Rousseau, Research Assistant, for the Learning & Teaching Office, 2018.
Please contact Michelle Schwartz, michelle.schwartz@ryerson.ca, with questions or suggestions for future topics.
http://www.ryerson.ca/lt