Marx’s capital is thermodynamics

Marx's Mathematical Model of CAPITAL

Book 1
Ivan Bourbaki

The book is dedicated to a WOMAN -

the Great Goddess of humanity.
The woman saved us all.

Издательские решения
По лицензии Ridero
2022
УДК 51
ББК 22.1
B81

Bourbaki Ivan
B81 Marx’s capital is thermodynamics / Ivan Bourbaki. —
[б. м.] : Издательские решения, 2022. — 250 с.
ISBN 978-5-0059-4424-5 (т. 1)
ISBN 978-5-0059-4425-2

Abstract mathematical dialectics of Hegel has been created.

Abstract dialectical pairs A-B and the multiplication operation
for them are introduced. With the help of Hegel’s mathematical
dialectics, it was possible to prove that Marx’s philosophy is
correct.
And it was possible to create a mathematical model of Marx’s
CAPITAL. Conclusions:
Marx’s Capital is THERMODYNAMICS;
The law of value is the Mendeleev-Clapeyron equation; A capitalist
enterprise is a heat engine with a Carnot cycle.

УДК 51
ББК 22.1

12+ В соответствии с ФЗ от 29.12.2010 №436-ФЗ

ISBN 978-5-0059-4424-5
ISBN 978-5-0059-4425-2 © Ivan Bourbaki, 2022
 3

Formula commodity and its graph.

ɋommodity by Russian the TOVAR. Therefore, the product is designated by the letter T, and not by
the letter C.


 4

CONTENTS

Preface 14
Category table in Russian and English 15
Chapter I. Formalization of Hegel’s dialectic 18
§ 1.1. Multiplication of dialectical pairs 18
The two-dimensional space of Marx categories ȳଶ is unusable to build a
§ 1.2. 20
consistent theory
§ 1.3. The four-dimensional space of Marx’s categories ȳସ . First order laws 20
§ 1.3.1. Product of dialectical pairs 20
§ 1.3.2. ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
The appearance of a four-dimensional vector LABOUR 21
§ 1.3.3. ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
The appearance of a four-dimensional vector COMMODITY 21
§ 1.3.4. The appearance of a two-dimensional vector ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
VALUE 22
The most incomprehensible theorem of Marx is “MONEY is the RELA-
§ 1.4. 23
TION OF PEOPLE”
§ 1.5. The dialectical pair THING – RELATION in Hegel’s dialectic 24
Hegel’s theorem on the THING. Consequence: “Marx’s theorem of
§ 1.6. 25
HUMAN”
The theory of RELATIVITY (the principle of relativity) is contained in
§ 1.7. 26
Hegel’s DIALECTICS
§ 1.8. Hegel discovered the disease: “THING FETISHISM” 27
Marx’s theory of capitalist fetishism. Fetishism No.1. The theory of
§ 1.9. 27
THING-VALUE FETISHISM
§ 1.10. The eight-dimensional space of Marx categories ȳ଼ . Second order laws 28
§ 1.10.1. The appearance of an eight-dimensional vector ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
‫ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬ 28
The appearance of an eight-dimensional vector
§ 1.10.2. ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦሺܴ݅݊‫݊ܽ݅ݏݏݑ‬ሻ
ሬԦ ൌ  ܱܸܶ‫ܴܣ‬ 29
‫ ܻܶܫܦܱܯܯܱܥ‬ൌ ܶ
The appearance of a four-dimensional vector ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ VALUE
§ 1.10.3. 30

The secret of Marx: “What does Marx mean by the word FORM?”
§ 1.10.4. 32
The Marx’s category FORM means the vector coordinate
The small-scale market as an ideal political economic gas with two
Chapter II. 34
degrees of freedom
Axioms of a market ideal political economy gas with two degrees of
§ 2.1. 34
freedom
§ 2.2. Table of analogies between political economy and thermodynamics 34
The half of the main political economic graph is the vector graph
§ 2.3. ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ ൌ ሬTԦ ൌ  TOVAR
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦሺinRussianሻ 35
COMMODITY
§ 2.4. Non-logical name systems. Definition of the VALUE category 35
§ 2.5. Marx’s theorems in the eight-dimensional space of categoriesെȳ଼ 36
§ 2.6. Thing category ‫ ܯ‬ൌ ‫ܯ‬௧ െ“Labour thing”. Mass of commodities 37
§ 2.7. Value category ܸʠ is labour value. Labour volume 39
 5

Thing category ܳ௧ is money thing. The total money supply.
§ 2.8. 39
Thermal energy is as THING, as tons of coal.
Value category ܳ஼ is money value, or value contained within total mon-
§ 2.9. 39
ey thing ܳ஼ . Thermal energy is as energy
Thing category ܼ௧ is total VALUE (abstract) THING, total VALUE (ab-
§ 2.10. 39
stract) THING-GOLD, with real VALUE inside
Value category ܼ஼ is total abstract VALUE. The energy obtained
§ 2.11. 39
through the real work of real people. NEW VALUE
Thing category ‫ܿܯ‬௏ is consumer mass (thing). In the transition process,
§ 2.12. 40
it is the total heat capacity of the market -‫ܥ‬. Thermal mass
§ 2.13. Value category ܵ. The theorem. Entropy is the use value 40
݇
Two Boltzmann constants. ൬ ௧ ൰ . The value (entropy) Boltzmann con-
݇௖
§ 2.14. 41
stant ݇஼ is a unit of use value. The thing Boltzmann constant (heat ca-
pacity) ݇௧ ሺ‫ܿݎ݋‬௏ ? ሻ is unit of consumer mass
Verbal description of the categories of the halves of the main political
§ 2.15. ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ. 41
economic graph - the graph of a vector COMMODITY
Chapter III. Five theories of thing fetishism 45
The first theory of thing fetishism. Fetishism No.1. Karl Marx’s theory
ܼ
§3.1. of THING-VALUE FETISHISM. Dialectical pair ൬ ஼ ൰ ൌ goldvalue െ 45
ܼ௧
goldthingሺvaluecarrierሻ
The second theory of thing fetishism. Fetishism No.2. The theory of
ܳ
§3.2. THING MONEY fetishism. Dialectical pair: ൬ ஼ ൰ ൌ money supply as a 45
ܳ௧
value and as a thing (value carrier)
The third theory of thing fetishism. Fetishism No.3. The theory of
ܵ
§3.3. THING CONSUMER fetishism. Dialectical pair: ቀ ቁ: use value and 46
‫ܥ‬
thing (carrier)
The fourth theory of thing fetishism. Fetishism No.4. The theory of
§3.4 46
THING LABOUR fetishism
ܸ ܸ
§3.4.1. Dialectical pair: ቀ ቁ ൌ ൬ ஼ ൰ is labour value and labour thing (carrier) 46
‫ܯ‬ ‫ܯ‬௧
§3.4.2. Is there a universal market molecule? 46
The fifth theory of thing fetishism. Fetishism No.5. The theory of social-
§3.5. 48
ist (state) fetishism of Marx-Lenin
§3.6. Table of thing fetishistic theories 50
Chapter IV. Axiomatization of the VALUE, not MONEY MARKET 52
Small-scale value market as an ideal two-dimensional political economic
§ 4.1. 52
gas
§ 4.2. The functioning of the VALUE, not the money market 55
§ 4.3. The axiom of the FUNDAMENTAL VALUE CONSTANT 56
Half of the main political economy graph is the graph of unit values of
§ 4.4. ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ. 59
the vector COMMODITY
 6

THE LAW OF VALUE and the ideal gas law of Mendeleev-Clapeyron
§ 4.5. 61
are one and the same law
The money market and golden FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANT of
Chapter V. 67
value
§ 5.1. The small-scale money market with two degrees of freedom 67
§ 5.2. Determination of the fundamental constant of value of the money market 67
Political economic sense of the golden FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANT
§ 5.3. 68
of value
Two ways to calculate the gold FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANT OF
§ 5.4. 68
VALUE: via people and via commodities
The theory of duality between people and commodities in a two-
§ 5.5. 69
dimensional space of categories
§ 5.6. Comparison of the categories of biology and political economy 71
Lenin’s theory of the duality of socialism. Socialism is a semi-
§ 5.7. 72
communist and semi-bourgeois system
How do COMMODITIES AND MONEY COME to LIFE in the politi-
§ 5.8. 73
cal economy? Money and commodities are LIVING predatory creatures
The duality between people and commodities is a formal, but not a sub-
§ 5.9. 75
stantive reason for commodity-money fetishism
§ 5.10. Contradictions of the golden fundamental constant of value 79
Indirect methods of calculating the gold FUNDAMENTAL CON-
§ 5.11. 82
STANT of value
Chapter VI. THE THERMODYNAMIC MODEL of the money market 85
§ 6.1. Fundamentals of thermodynamics via insulators 85
Hypothesis. Marx’s “COMMODITY” category is a complicated mole-
§ 6.2. 86
cule, composed of two first-order “COMMODITY” categories
Political economy is the human science dealing with the feelings of mil-
§ 6.3. 88
lions of people (classes)
Four feelings create a four-parametric model. These feelings materialize
§ 6.4. 89
in Marx’s Capital
§ 6.5. Lenin’s theorem on THE DUALITY of peasants-small-scale producers 90
Axiomatic construction of the set of rational numbers coincides with the
§ 6.6 91
method of Marx
Small-scale production operates according to the following scheme:
§ 6.7. 92
Consumed-Produced-Sold-Bought:‫ ܥ‬െ ܲ െ ܵ െ ‫ܤ‬.

§ 6.8. What dimension does the vector ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ

PROLETARIAN have in a capitalist, 93
non-small-scale society?
Chapter VII. PROCESSES in political economic thermodynamics 95
§ 7.1. Isobaric process with a heater in physics 95
Is the physical isobaric process with a heater a political economic pro-
§ 7.2. 98
cess?
Is a physical isochoric process with a heater a process in political econ-
§ 7.3. 102
omy?
Is a physical isothermal process with a volume reductor a process in po-
§ 7.4. 104
litical economy?
 7

Is a physical adiabatic process with a volume accumulator a process in
§ 7.5. 110
political economy?
Chapter VIII. Capitalist firm is a HEAT ENGINE operating on Carnot CYCLE 113
Assumptions for the realization of the Carnot cycle in the Marx’s CAPI-
§ 8.1. 113
TAL
§ 8.2. Developing the Carnot CYCLE using Marx’s formulas 114
§ 8.3. The difference between political economy and physics 117
§ 8.4. Is it possible to construct Marx’s mechanical HEAT ENGINE? 118
The theory of thing VALUE fetishism No.1 and the fundamental con-
§ 8.5. 121
stant of value
§ 8.6. Small-scale producer is an oscillator 122
§ 8.7. The main curse of political economy: TIME is MULTIDIMENSIONAL 122
Formalization of Marx’s CAPITAL with the help of MATHEMA-
Chapter IX. 124
TIZED HEGEL’S DIALECTICS
The logical (Hegelian) scheme of the origin of money discovered by
§ 9.1. 124
Marx
The theory of duality. There are FOUR laws of SUPPLY and FOUR
§ 9.2. 127
laws of DEMAND in the eight-dimensional space of categories
§ 9.3. Marx’s CAPITAL is the science of a SIXTEEN-DIMENSIONAL MAN 128
The fundamental value constant ‫݌‬ʠ is the soul of a man in a golden shell,
§ 9.4. 128
in a golden prison
§ 9.5 The problem of constructing a model dual to the ideal gas law 131
§ 9.6. Marx’s theory of labour productivity in thermodynamic form 132
Marx’s theory of the productivity of concrete labour (POWER OF LA-
§ 9.7. BOUR) is modeled by an isobaric-isochoric process with a variable 134
number of particles
Marx’s theory of the productivity of abstract labour (LABOUR INTEN-
§ 9.8. SITY is modeled by an isochoric-isothermal process with a variable 135
number of particles)
Marx’s theory of labour productivity in the eight-dimensional space of
§ 9.9. 136
categories ȳ଼
The MAIN POLITICAL ECONOMIC GRAPH:
Chapter X. ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ 138
ࡸ࡭࡮ࡻࢁࡾ ‫ ڂ‬ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
࡯ࡻࡹࡹࡻࡰࡵࢀࢅ. We need to deduce ALL categories
§ 10.1. The plan for further modeling of Marx’s CAPITAL 138
The need to create a new science “MODEL THEORY” for Marx’s CAP-
§ 10.2. 140
ITAL
Derivation of the laws of dialectics and political economy by using
Chapter XI. 144
MULTIPLICATION OF DIALECTICAL PAIRS
Multiplication of dialectical pairs and transformation of a complex pair
§ 11.1. 144
into a graph
Derivation of the LENIN’S DEFINITION OF THE LAW by multiplying
§ 11.2. 144
dialectical pairs
Interpretation of Lenin’s theorem on the LAW in linear and projective
§ 11.3. 145
geometries
 8

Chapter XII. IDEAL MONEY MARKET model 147
Market model in the form of an ideal gas state equation with VALUES
§ 12.1. 147
enclosed within the GOLD-THING
The local LAW of VALUE acts in differential form in the TANGENT
§ 12.2. 147
SPACE of the manifold of states
§ 12.3. The GLOBAL LAW of VALUE is the LAW of CONSERVATION 148
Chapter XIII. Reproduction. Marx’s schemes 150
§ 13.1. The law of value under capitalism 150
§ 13.2. Simple reproduction in thermodynamic form. Marx’s scheme 150
§ 13.3. Simple reproduction in standard form. Marx’s scheme 150
§ 13.4. Criticism of Leontief model 155
§ 13.5. Marx’s scheme of simple reproduction written in matrix form 155
Marx’s scheme of simple reproduction adjusted for the number of work-
§ 13.6. 165
ers
§ 13.7. Modeling simple reproduction according to Marx’s scheme 166
§ 13.8. List of authors’ books: Book I, Book II, Book III, Book IV, Book V 170
The contents of the author’s book II: “MATHEMATIZED HE-
Chapter XIV. 171
GEL’S DIALECTICS”
§ 14.1. Introduction of abstract dialectical pairs A-B instead of concrete pairs 171
The main discovery of Hegel is the discovery of “EVOLUTION OF
§ 14.2 172
CATEGORIES AND LAWS (IDEAS)”
§ 14.3. Hegel’s discovery of the LOGICAL VACUUM 173
The logical theory of catastrophes was created by Hegel. He is the first
§ 14.4. 174
scientist-CATASTROPHIST on the planet
Hegel predicted the birth of the USSR with the doctrine of LOGICAL
§ 14.5. 179
MONARCHY
Hegel predicted the coming of Stalin with the doctrine of LOGICAL
§ 14.6. 180
MONARCHY
Hegel predicted the death of the USSR, as a METAPHYSICAL, non-
§ 14.7. 181
dialectical system
Hegel’s dialectics is the doctrine of the VARIABLE, i.e., the LIVING,
§ 14.8. 181
i.e., the DIALECTICAL WORLD, i.e., the pure COMMUNISM
It is IMPOSSIBLE to study Hegel’s dialectics without TRIAD INDICES
§ 14.9. 185
of the authors
Hegel’s law of correspondence. The Bohr’s correspondence principle is
§ 14.10. 186
a consequence of Hegel’s law
Hegel formed the theory of pure communism with the help of his famous
§ 14.11. 188
TRIADS
The PROGRAM of Hegel’s IDEALISM. The communist revolution is a
§ 14.12 dialectical revolution. Communist (not socialist) revolution IS the UP- 189
RISING of the IDEA!
§ 14.13. Examples of Lenin’s use of Hegel’s IDEALISM 190
§ 14.14. Hegel’s idealism says that “We must kill the DARK IDEA of ELITA- 191
 9

RISM” and this idea must be killed in OURSELVES!
The necessity of creating a new science – MODEL theory for MATHE-
§ 14.15. 191
MATIZED Hegel’s dialectics
Hegel’s dialectics is the theory of the GREAT UNIFICATION of man-
§ 14.16 192
kind
The development of the theory of communism with the help of Hegel’s
§ 14.17. 192
IDEALISM
§ 14.18. Hegel deceived the Prussian and socialist elites! 193
The contents of the author’s book III: “The POLITICAL ECO-
Chapter XV. 195
NOMIC WORLD of Marx-Engels”
Marx’s theorem on the withering away of the nationality is TRUE, but as
§ 15.1. 195
about POLITICAL ECONOMIC nationality! Marx is not a biologist
Marx’s theorem on the withering away of the family is TRUE, but as
§ 15.2. 195
about POLITICAL ECONOMIC family! Marx is not a biologist
Marx’s theorem on the NATIONALIZATION of CHILDREN is TRUE,
§ 15.3. but as about POLITICAL ECONOMIC nationalization! Marx is not a 195
biologist
Marx’s theorem on the NATIONALIZATION of WOMEN is TRUE,
§ 15.4. but as about POLITICAL ECONOMIC nationalization! Marx is not a 195
biologist
§ 15.5. Marx: “EQUALITY is the DESTRUCTION of CLASSES” 196
The law of shortening the social formations lifetime. Communism will
§ 15.6. 197
live ZERO years!
§ 15.7. The political economy of communism is a quantum science! 198
The contents of the author’s book IV: Lenin built the political econ-
Chapter XVI. 200
omy of both COMMUNISM and SOCIALISM
What is the difference between Lenin’s works and the works of Hegel,
§ 16.1. 200
Marx and Engels?
Lenin discovered the SECOND TRANSITIONAL FORM between capi-
§ 16.2. 202
talism and pure communism
Lenin destroyed MONEY (greed) within the PARTY using partmaxi-
§ 16.3. 204
mum
The statistical accuracy of Marx’s theorems is determined. SIX DECI-
§ 16.4. 205
MAL PLACES!
The historical role of socialism is monopolization. But CAPITAL ac-
§ 16.5. complished a mission of socialism. Thus, socialism is not needed, and 205
not possible
E-money is the death of TECHNICAL MONEY, i.e. the technical base
§16.6. for the destruction of POLITICAL ECONOMIC money is already pre- 206
sent!
Lenin compiled a table of categories of political economy of socialism.
§16.7. 206
But no one knows it!
Lenin compiled a table of categories of political economy of com-
§16.8. 229
munism. But no one knows it!
Chapter The contents of the author’s book V “Marx has already prepared
230
XVII. the theory of the CULTURAL REVOLUTION of COMMUNISM
 10

(not socialism)”
§17.1. Marx’s theory of the universal man or every child is a genius 230
Marx’s DISCOVERY of a new POLITICAL ECONOMIC (spiritual)
§17.2. 230
EVOLUTION. We are starting with political economic monkeys
Marx’s theory is the doctrine of the new POLITICAL ECONOMIC
§17.3. 230
CRO-MAGNONS
§17.4. Hegel and Marx created the UNIVERSAL (!) POLITICAL ECONOMY 232
§17.5. The PROGRAM of a COMMUNIST (not socialist) REVOLUTION 232
§17.6. The power structure under communism 236
The FACTOR-GROUP theorem describes the power structure under
§17.7. 236
communism
On the scientific name of the party that builds communism, not social-
§17.8. 237
ism
The best collection of Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Vladimir Lenin:
§17.9. 240
“SOCIALISM and COMMUNISM”
§17.10. Russian way 241
§17.11. The prophecy 245
REFERENCES 249



 11
11

Letter

Dear friend!
The team of Russian mathematicians created a mathematical model of MARX’s CAPITAL
(parts). The task of turning CAPITAL into a mathematical model was set by Marx. Furthermore, he
even tried to create it. For this purpose he studied the works of the great mathematicians – Lagrange
and others. There is a whole book of Marx’s mathematical manuscripts.

Thus, Marx’s CAPITAL is not a political book. Marx’s CAPITAL is a mathematical model
of the world capitalist economy (CALCULATION SCHEMES OF MARX).
Marx believed that his work would be able to predict the date of the next global crisis, and it
would only be necessary to put statistical data of the world economy into the mathematical model.
And that is true. The mathematical model will really be able to predict the date of the next global
crisis. Marxism is a science, because Marxism is a precise mathematical model of capitalist society.

What was the most difficult part of our work? The most difficult thing was to work not with formu-
las, but with axioms.
1. The authors first gave the axioms of political economy.
2. The authors first introduced the FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANTS of the political economy
of capitalism (and communism, not socialism).
3. Any science can be considered a fundamental science only after there will be FUNDA-
MENTAL CONSTANTS and AXIOMS in it.

THE MAIN RESULTS OF THE AUTHORS

1. The word ‘VALUE’ occurs in Marx’s CAPITAL many times and in different situations.
This uncertainty leads to logical contradictions. To resolve these contradictions, the authors did the
following:
a) Marx’s categories were written in the form of VECTORS.
b) It turned out that only the EIGHT-DIMENSIONAL SPACE OF CATEGORIES allows us to
present the entire Marx’s CAPITAL without metaphysical, i.e., insoluble contradictions.
And the authors’ work is an EIGHT-DIMENSIONAL mathematical MODEL of the Marx’s CAPI-
TAL.
2. The global LAW OF VALUE turned out to be the ideal gas law from the theory of gases.
3. Marx’s CAPITAL is the THERMODYNAMICS of political economy. And it would be
more correct to call Marx’s CAPITAL the political economic thermodynamics or thermodynamics
of CAPITAL. Marx described various thermodynamic processes in CAPITAL, he fixed some vari-
ables and modified others.
4. The capitalist firm turned out to be a heat engine of a new, unknown type, which the authors
called the Karl Marx’s heat engine.
5. Marx’s heat engine operates in a Carnot cycle.
6. The local law of value acts in the tangent space of the manifold of states.
7. Entropy is the USE VALUE of Marx.
12 12

8. CONSUMER MASS and COMMODITY MASS turned out to be different categories.
9. Consumer mass is THE HEAT CAPACITY OF THE MARKET, i.e., the total heat capacity
of the thermodynamic system.
10. COMMODITY MASS is tons of wheat or amount of commodities.
The theorem. Buyers believe that the market sells the COMMODITY MASS. However, it is an illu-
sion.
It turned out that the CONSUMER MASS (total heat capacity) is sold on the market. This means
that buyers pay not for the COMMODITY MASS, but for the CONSUMER MASS.
This illusion was discovered by Marx. Marx called it COMMODITY-MONEY FETISHISM. The
fetish is an inverting lens that is put on the eyes and brains of bourgeois theorists.
11. The authors’ mathematical model made it possible to create a rigorous mathematical theory.
COMMODITY-MONEY FETISHISM OF MARX. In fact, there is something more: the mathemat-
ical model made it possible to create a formalized THEORY OF FETISHISM and to give a classifi-
cation of various fetishistic theories.
The most general theory of THING FETISHISM was created by the great Hegel. The authors ap-
plied it and described it in detail. On the bourgeois theoretics and their pseudoscience of economic
physics
12. The theorists of capitalism created the science of ECONOMIC PHYSICS. Thousands of ar-
ticles and many books were published on this science. There were even the world symposiums. The
discovery of this science was grandiose, but then there was silent as the grave. It turned out that this
science cannot carry out ANY REAL ECONOMIC CALCULATION.
13. The analysis of the authors showed that all calculations of ECONOMIC PHYSICISTS are
false and give false numerical data. Why? The axioms of this bourgeois pseudoscience are false.
14. Question. Is it possible that some of the results of bourgeois ECONOMIC PHYSICS are
correct?
Let’s answer the question with a question: can an optical lens turn over only one thing and not all
(at the same position)? It cannot.
Answer. A FETISHIST LENS works in exactly the same way as an optical lens. THE FETISHIST
LENS turns EVERYTHING UPSIDE DOWN! And it means that bourgeois ECONOMIC PHYS-
ICS cannot give any correct calculation or correct conclusion. All the achievements of this science
are inverted and false. Moreover, the economic scientists stand upside down, but they do not notice
this.
15. From the very beginning of our work, we knew that ECONOMIC PHYSICS was created
long ago and is called Marx’s CAPITAL.
16. The first axiom of economic physics belongs to the great Friedrich Engels. Here it is.
The axiom of Engels. MAN is a statistical ATOM OF HISTORY.
The great Engels used this axiom to justify the existence of historical laws.
Marx’s CAPITAL is built on the analogy of a man and an electron or an atom.

WHAT NEXT?
 13
13

The authors have created a mathematical model of not all of Marx’s CAPITAL. Mortals cannot do
that. Marx’s CAPITAL is the greatest scientific work and scientific discovery in the history of man-
kind accomplished by ONE PERSON (two).
Marx’s CAPITAL is more complicated than the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics com-
bined.
Example. It is quite possible to create a QUANTUM MODEL OF MARX’S CAPITAL, and we
have shown this in our work.
The authors created a mathematical model of only one part of Marx’s CAPITAL, but the most im-
portant part of the work.
AXIOMATIZATION and EIGHT-DIMENSIONAL SPACE MODEL allowed us to precisely and
UNAMBIGUOUSLY define all categories of Marx’s political economy. So now it is possible to
build A COMPLETE MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF MARX’S CAPITAL.
However, for this we need brilliant mathematicians and physicists. Marx's CAPITAL is not for in-
experienced researchers.
Therefore, the authors ask to transfer this work to mathematicians, physicists, computer scientist,
and technicians.
MATHEMATICIANS and PHYSICISTS need to create a TEAM to build a complete mathematical
model of Marx’s CAPITAL. The strength of the authors is gone.

Dear readers and publishers!

This book is a communist (neither socialist nor capitalist) form of ownership. In other words, it is
the NATIONWIDE form of ownership, it belongs to all mankind. It means:
1. Everyone can translate this book into any languages and publish it and make a profit.
2. No one can forbid other people to publish this book.

The authors.
14 14

Preface
THE SECOND COMING OF KARL MARX
The situation in political economy is the same as it was in Maxwell’s time. Faraday is the author of
the theory of the electromagnetic field. He discovered the most important laws of electrodynamics.
And Maxwell turned Faraday’s theory into his equations.
Marx is Faraday in political economy. But the left-wing politics did not find its own Maxwell.
THE MYSTERY OF HISTORY
Karl Marx is the unknown leader of mankind. The party pseudonym is ZEUS! Marx’s CAPITAL is
a grandiose mathematical model of the world capitalist economy. Marx believed that his work
would be able to predict the date and scale of a new world crisis. And so it is. All that is needed is
to put all the basic data of the world economy in the Marx’s CAPITAL.
Our work has shown that Marx’s CAPITAL is a logical thermodynamic system. And the work of
Marx is more correctly called “THERMODYNAMICS OF CAPITAL” or political economic ther-
modynamics.
Our main results are as follows:
1. It turns out that Karl Marx’s LAW OF VALUE is the MENDELEEV-CLAPEYRON EQUA-
TION.
2. It turns out that the capitalist enterprise is a heat engine operating on the CARNOT cycle.
Theorem. The thermal efficiency of the Carnot cycle and the Marx profit rate are the same formula:

ܶଵ െ ܶଶ ݉
ߠൌ ൌ .
ܶଶ ܿ൅‫ݒ‬

Bourgeois scientists have discovered a new science, it is ECONOMIC PHYSICS. But they did not
make any real calculations. They cannot predict world crises, and crises are objective. Bourgeois
scientists carry out all calculations, taking into account only money. And money is just a superstruc-
ture over time. It is impossible to understand the essence of political economy by studying only the
superstructure.
The real ECONOMIC PHYSICS is Marx’s CAPITAL. Economic physics as a science was created
long ago by Karl Marx. And the main idea of this science is that “Man is the statistical atom of his-
tory”, which belongs to Friedrich Engels (Dialectics of Nature).
The Germans and Vikings have a legend about the second coming of their pagan deities. And that
hour has come. Zeus promised to return and it is his second coming!
This book is written for physicists of quantum mechanics, thermodynamic physicists, mathemati-
cians and logicians. Only they are able to create a complete mathematical model of Marx’s Capital.
And our work makes it easier for them.
 15
15


Category table in Russian and English

Market ɪɵɧɨɤ
ɋommodity ɬɨɜɚɪ
ɋommodities ɬɨɜɚɪɵ
Goods Ɍɨɜɚɪ (ɪɟɞɤɨ)
Priɫe ɐɟɧɚ 500 ɪɚɡ
Money ɞɟɧɶɝɢ
Small-scale market Ɇɟɥɤɨɬɨɜɚɪɧɵɣ ɪɵɧɨɤ
Producer ɉɪɨɢɡɜɨɞɢɬɟɥɶ
A small-scale producer Ɇɟɥɤɨ-ɬɨɜɚɪɧɢɤ
VALUE ( ɚ ɧɟ COST) ɋɬɨɢɦɨɫɬɶ
use value ɉɨɬɪɟɛɢɬɟɥɶɫɤɚɹ ɫɬɨɢɦɨɫɬɶ
Consumer ɉɨɬɪɟɛɢɬɟɥɶ
The law of value Ɂɚɤɨɧ ɫɬɨɢɦɨɫɬɢ
Surplus-Value ɉɪɢɛɚɜɨɱɧɚɹ ɫɬɨɢɦɨɫɬɶ
Labour Ɍɪɭɞ
Labour value Ɍɪɭɞɨɜɚɹ ɫɬɨɢɦɨɫɬɶ
Labour hour [Lh] Ɍɪɭɞɨɜɨɣ ɱɚɫ.
Labour theory of value Ɍɪɭɞɨɜɚɹ ɬɟɨɪɢɹ ɫɬɨɢɦɨɫɬɢ
Hired worker ɇɚɟɦɧɵɣ ɪɚɛɨɱɢɣ
Labour hours [Lh] Ɍɪɭɞɨɜɵɟ ɱɚɫɵ
Labour-power (ɢɥɢ Labour-Power) Ɋɚɛɨɱɚɹ ɫɢɥɚ
Productivity of labour ɉɪɨɢɡɜɨɞɢɬɟɥɶɧɨɫɬɶ ɬɪɭɞɚ
Intensity ɂɧɬɟɧɫɢɜɧɨɫɬɶ ɬɪɭɞɚ
Power of Labour ɋɢɥɚ ɬɪɭɞɚ
A quantity of labour Ʉɨɥɢɱɟɫɬɜɨ ɬɪɭɞɚ
Concrete labour Ʉɨɧɤɪɟɬɧɵɣ ɬɪɭɞ
Abstract labour Ⱥɛɫɬɪɚɤɬɧɵɣ ɬɪɭɞ
Mass Ɇɚɫɫɚ
Demand and supply ɉɪɟɞɥɨɠɟɧɢɟ ɢ ɫɩɪɨɫ
Law of supply and demand Ɂɚɤɨɧ ɫɩɪɨɫɚ ɢ ɩɪɟɞɥɨɠɟɧɢɹ
Thing ȼeɳɶ ( ɮɢɥɨɫɨɮɫɤɚɹ ɤɚɬɟɝɨɪɢɹ)
Relation Ɉɬɧɨɲɟɧɢɟ
Thing fetishism ȼɟɳɟɜɨɣ ɮɟɬɢɲɢɡɦ
Thing commodity-money fetishism ȼɟɳɟɜɨɣ ɬɨɜɚɪɨ-ɞɟɧɟɠɧɵɣ ɮɟɬɢɲɢɡɦ
Essence and Phenomenon ɋɭɳɧɨɫɬɶ ɢ əɜɥɟɧɢɟ
Marx’s theory of alienation Ɍɟɨɪɢɹ ɨɬɱɭɠɞɟɧɢɹ Ɇɚɪɤɫɚ
Alienation Ɉɬɱɭɠɞɟɧɢɟ
Contradictions ɉɪɨɬɢɜɨɪɟɱɢɟ
Treasurs ɋɨɤɪɨɜɢɳɚ
The equilibrium market Ɋɚɜɧɨɜɟɫɬɧɵɣ ɪɵɧɨɤ
Equilibrium thermodynamics Ɋɚɜɧɨɜɟɫɧɚɹ ɬɟɪɦɨɞɢɧɚɦɢɤɚ
Equations of state of an ideal gas ɍɪɚɜɧɟɧɢɟ ɫɨɫɬɨɹɧɢɹ ɢɞɟɚɥɶɧɨɝɨ ɝɚɡɚ
The ideal gas law Ɉɛɳɟɟ ɝɚɡɨɜɨɟ ɭɪɚɜɧɟɧɢɟ
seller ɉɪɨɞɚɜɟɰ
buyer ɩɨɤɭɩɚɬɟɥɶ
Consumer ɉɨɬɪɟɛɢɬɟɥɶ
16 16

assumption ɉɪɟɞɩɨɥɨɠɟɧɢɹ\Ƚɢɩɨɬɟɡɚ\ɉɨɫɬɭɥɚɬ
damnation ɉɪɨɤɥɹɬɶɟ
harvest ɍɪɨɠɚɣ
the dialectical pair Ⱦɢɚɥɟɤɬɢɱɟɫɤɚɹ ɩɚɪɚ
pair ɩɚɪɚ
The embryo Ɂɚɪɨɞɵɲ
embryonic categories Ɂɚɪɨɞɵɲɟɜɵɟ, ɷɦɛɪɢɨɧɚɥɶɧɵɟ ɤɚɬɟɝɨɪɢɢ
Maxwell’s equations ɫɬɪɨɣɧɵɟ ɭɪɚɜɧɟɧɢɹ
leader ɜɨɠɞɶ
Mankind\humanity ɱɟɥɨɜɟɱɟɫɬɜɨ
Left-wing politics ɥɟɜɨɝɨ ɞɜɢɠɟɧɢɹ
thermal efficiency Ɍɟɪɦɢɱɟɫɤɢɣ ɄɉȾ
the Carnot cycle ɰɢɤɥɚ Ʉɚɪɧɨ
the Marx rate of profit ɧɨɪɦɚ ɩɪɢɛɵɥɢ Ɇɚɪɤɫɚ
binary graph ɞɜɨɢɱɧɵɣ ɝɪɚɮ
phenomenon ɹɜɥɟɧɢɟ
MIND ɊȺɁɍɆ
FAITH ȼȿɊȺ
aim ɰɟɥɶ
Minimal genome ɦɢɧɢɦɚɥɶɧɵɣ ɝɟɧɨɦ
TRANSITION ɩɟɪɟɯɨɞ
space ɩɪɨɫɬɪɚɧɫɬɜɨ
Attention ȼɧɢɦɚɧɢɟ
Definition ɈɉɊȿȾȿɅȿɇɂȿ
Note Ɂɚɦɟɱɚɧɢɟ
four-dimensional ɱɟɬɵɪɟɯɦɟɪɧɨɦ
exchange value ɦɟɧɨɜɚɹ ɫɬɨɢɦɨɫɬɶ
degrees of freedom ɫɬɟɩɟɧɢ ɫɜɨɛɨɞɵ
consequence ɩɨɫɥɟɞɫɬɜɢɟ
product ɉɪɨɢɡɜɟɞɟɧɢɟ (ɪɟɡɭɥɶɬɚɬ ɭɦɧɨɠɟɧɢɹ)
after-market ȼɬɨɪɢɱɧɵɣ ɪɵɧɨɤ
the first coming of the market ɉɟɪɜɨɟ ɩɪɢɲɟɫɬɜɢɟ ɪɵɧɤɚ
volume Ɉɛɴɟɦ
worker Ɋɚɛɨɱɢɣ (ɱɟɥɨɜɟɤ)
thermal energy Ɍɟɩɥɨɜɚɹ ɷɧɟɪɝɢɹ
thermal mass ɬɟɪɦɢɱɟɫɤɚɹ ɦɚɫɫɚ
heat capacity ɬɟɩɥɨɟɦɤɨɫɬɶ
gold bar ɫɥɢɬɨɤ ɡɨɥɨɬɚ
Pressure Ⱦɚɜɥɟɧɢɟ
COMMAND ɩɪɢɤɚɡ
labour inputs Ɍɪɭɞɨɡɚɬɪɚɬɵ
unit values ɟɞɢɧɢɱɧɚɹ ɜɟɥɢɱɢɧɚ
the ideal gas law ɭɪɚɜɧɟɧɢɟ Ɇɟɧɞɟɥɟɟɜɚ-Ʉɥɚɣɩɟɪɨɧɚ
ɡɨɥɨɬɚɹ ɮɭɧɞɚɦɟɧɬɚɥɶɧɚɹ ɤɨɧɫɬɚɧɬ ɫɬɨ-
the gold fundamental constant of value
ɢɦɨɫɬɢ
living ɠɢɜɨɣ
wage Ɂɚɪɩɥɚɬɚ (ɨɩɥɚɬɚ ɡɚ ɬɪɭɞ)
inverting pair ɩɟɪɟɜɨɪɚɱɢɜɚɧɢɟ ɩɚɪɵ
migrant worker ɝɚɫɬɚɪɛɚɣɬɟɪ
 17
17

heat-insulating ɬɟɩɥɨɢɡɨɥɹɰɢɨɧɧɵɣ
accumulator ɧɚɤɨɩɢɬɟɥɶ
world market ɦɢɪɨɜɨɣ ɪɵɧɨɤ
labour penny Ɍɪɭɞɨɜɚɹ ɤɨɩɟɣɤɚ
refrigerator ɯɨɥɨɞɢɥɶɧɢɤ
heater ɧɚɝɪɟɜɚɬɟɥɶ
enhancer ɭɜɟɥɢɱɢɬɟɥɶ
reductor ɭɦɟɧɶɲɢɬɟɥɶ
oscillation ɤɨɥɟɛɚɧɢɟ
labour time Ɋɚɛɨɱɟɟ ɜɪɟɦɹ
model theory ɬɟɨɪɢɹ ɦɨɞɟɥɟɣ
mass of commodities Ɍɨɜɚɪɧɚɹ ɦɚɫɫɚ
machines ɫɬɚɧɤɢ
Food products ɩɪɨɞɭɤɬɵ
sector ɨɬɪɚɫɥɶ
Engines ɦɚɲɢɧɵ
tax ɩɨɲɥɢɧɚ
Topos (topoi) Ɍɨɩɨɫ (ɬɨɩɨɫɵ)
Set theory Ɍɟɨɪɢɹ ɦɧɨɠɟɫɬɜ
Set Ɇɧɨɠɟɫɬɜɨ
Mappings ɨɬɨɛɪɚɠɟɧɢɹ
Totality ɋɨɜɨɤɭɩɧɨɫɬɶ
setback ɬɨɪɦɨɡ
Control theory Ɍɟɨɪɢɹ ɭɩɪɚɜɥɟɧɢɹ
ALLEGEDLY əɄɈȻɕ
division of labour ɪɚɡɞɟɥɟɧɢɟ ɬɪɭɞɚ
creativity Ɍɜɨɪɱɟɫɬɜɨ
Emancipation of LABOUR Ɉɫɜɨɛɨɠɞɟɧɢɟ ɬɪɭɞɚ
Monocracy ȿɞɢɧɨɥɢɱɢɟ
The global commune Ɉɛɳɟɧɚɪɨɞ
Withering away Ɉɬɦɢɪɚɧɢɟ
Communard movement Ʉɨɦɦɭɧɚɪɫɤɨɟ ɞɜɢɠɟɧɢɟ
Uprising of the idea ȼɨɫɫɬɚɧɢɟ ɢɞɟɢ
The law of TIMEREVERSAL Ɂɚɤɨɧ ɨɛɪɚɳɟɧɢɹ ɜɪɟɦɟɧɢ
Theory of inversion Ɍɟɨɪɢɹ ɨɛɪɚɳɟɧɢɹ



18 18

V. I. Lenin: “Categories must bederived”

Chapter I. Formalization of Hegel’s dialectic.

§ 1.1. Multiplication of dialectical pairs

Hegel, Marx, Engels, Lenin are the greatest LOGICIANS, they are mathematicians. They derive
axioms and prove theorems. Therefore, the formalization of their work was the main task of the
day. The authors began the formalization with the Hegelian dialectic.
The task of formalizing Hegel’s dialectics and turning it into mathematical logic was set by V.I.
Lenin.
And this is no coincidence. Lenin’s father, Ilya Nikolaevich Ulyanov, is a candidate of physical and
mathematical sciences. He is a student of the great mathematician Nikolai Ivanovich Lobachevsky,
the creator of non-Euclidean geometry.
The results of the formalization of dialectics are presented in the authors’ book “Mathematized dia-
lectics of Hegel”. Here we present small fragments of this book.

Philosophy
Metaphysics Dialectics
Constant categories, “dead” Function categories, “living”
Merit of the authors
Instead of concrete pairs such as essence – phenomenon or form – body, the authors
introduced abstract pairs A – B, C – D. And all the laws of Hegel’s philosophy set out in the
abstract form with abstract pairs.
Results
If you substitute specific pairs, such as mind – faith, form – body, into the abstract
theorems, you can get all of Hegel’s theorems.
Visualization of Hegel’s philosophy. Authors introduced pictures of pairs
Metaphysical pair Dialectical pair

Purpose of work
The authors introduced the multiplication operations of metaphysical and dialectical
pairs. Purpose: to get all of Hegel’s great theorems by multiplying dialectical pairs.
The authors put triadic indices to all Hegel’s categories. It is impossible to study Hegel’s
books without triadic indices.

Dialectical pairs are multiplied as follows:

 19
19


For each complex pair, a corresponding binary graph is constructed.

Why is philosophy a complex science?

Answer. Multiplication of dialectical pairs in philosophy is a non-commutative operation.

Example. The problem is described by four pairs. Rearranging the factors, we get 4!=24 different
products and 24 graphs of the fourth order. If you connect 24 graphs into one super graph, this super
graph will give a complete solving.
New problem: there are not enough Russian or English words to describe permutations of multipli-
ers. It is necessary to create a new mathematical language for Hegel’s logic.
Hegel’s theory of TRANSITIONS.
Faraday’s great law of electromagnetic induction is a transition: magnetism-electricity.
The laws of genetics are the transition: CONTINUOUS (evolution) – DISCRETE (genes).
The main theorem of Hegel’s theory of TRANSITION.
The transition of the categories of an abstract dialectical pair into each other is always a GREAT
LAW, always a great discovery.
Wikipedia article. Minimal genome.
Craig Venter and the team of approximately 20 scientists studied the bacterium Mycoplasma genita-
lium. It contains 517 genes. Scientists turned off the genes of this bacterium one by one. They found
that 265–350 genes are vital. Thus, a bacterium with a minimal genome was synthesized. This work
is an outstanding discovery. It will provide a solution to the greatest problem of our time: “How did
life begin on Earth?”
The problem of creating a MINIMAL political economy. The law of the unity of the world. This
requires:
1) to create a model of Marx’s “CAPITAL” with a minimum number of categories.
2) to combine all categories into dialectical pairs.
Synonyms must be destroyed. Political economy as a humanities also must be destroyed and turn it
into a mathematical science. This work is devoted to a partial solution of this complex problem. The
objective is to automate the inference of all categories of Marx’s CAPITAL.
There are two different theories in Marx’s CAPITAL.
Theory No.1. Evolutionary theory. This theory answers the question: “How were the categories
born?”. Marx gives an example of the birth of the category “value”. He considers the embryonic
forms of value: “The relative, equivalent, universal forms of value”. The use of the Hegel’s triad is
mandatory here.
20 20

Theory No. 2. Mathematical model. All his categories were born. Evolution is complete.
And it is possible to create a mathematical model. These two theories must not be confused. The
same words in these two theories may have different meanings. It is better not to consider evolu-
tionary theory when modeling Marx’s CAPITAL.

§ 1.2. The two-dimensional space of Marx categories ષ૛ is unusable to build a consistent theo-
ry.

We consider sequentially two-dimensional, four-dimensional, eight-dimensional spaces of Marx’s

categories. But there is no evolution:
two െ dimensional ՜ four െ dimensional ՜ eight െ dimensional݊‫݋‬.
From the very beginning, we consider the space category to be eight-dimensional. A four-
dimensional space is a compressed image of an eight-dimensional space.

Here we construct a two-dimensional space category ȳଶ .

Definition. The category “labour” is considered a scalar. The category “labour” is an auxiliary cate-
gory. It is not a vector name ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
‫ ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬.
ܿ‫݁ݐ݁ݎܿ݊݋‬ ݇
Definition. There is a pair: ቀ ቁ ൌ ቀ ቁ. Marx deduces the main categories of political econ-
ܾܽ‫ݐܿܽݎݏ‬ ܽ
omy with this pair.
Attention. The ܿ‫ ݁ݐ݁ݎܿ݊݋‬category name is ݇, not ܿ.
Definition. The vector ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
‫ ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬is the following vector:
ሬԦ ൌ ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ concrete concretelabour ‫݇ܮ‬
‫ܮ‬ ‫ ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬ൌ ቀ ቁ ‫ ݎݑ݋ܾ݈ܽ כ‬ൌ ቀ ቁ ൌ ቀ ቁ
absract absractlabour ‫ܽܮ‬
Marx’s first order theorem:
1ሻConcretelabourcreatesusevalue
ฬ
2ሻAbstractlabourcreatesvalue
At first glance, everything is correct. But indeed the two-dimensional theory is a contradictory theo-
ry and should be discarded.

§ 1.3. The four-dimensional space of Marx’s categories ષ૝ . First order laws.

§ 1.3.1. Product of dialectical pairs
Dialectical pair of Hegel: THING-RELATION:

Multiplying the thing-relation pair by the concrete-abstract pair, we get:

‫݇ݐ‬
thing concrete ‫ݐ‬ ݇ ‫ܽݐ‬
ቀ ቁ‫כ‬ቀ ቁ ൌ ቀ ቁ ‫ כ‬ቀ ቁ ൌ ൮ ൲.
relation absract ‫ݎ‬ ܽ ‫݇ݎ‬
‫ܽݎ‬
 21
21

§ 1.3.2. The appearance of a four-dimensional vector ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
ࡸ࡭࡮ࡻࢁࡾ.

Definition. The category “labour” is an auxiliary category, it is considered a scalar.

Definition. The vector ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
‫ ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬is the following vector:
ሬԦ ൌ ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ ‫݇ ݐ‬
‫ܮ‬ ‫ ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬ൌ ቀ ቁ ቀ ቁ ݈ܾܽ‫ݎݑ݋‬
‫ܽ ݎ‬

ሬԦ ൌ ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ thing concrete

‫ܮ‬ ‫ ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬ൌ ቀ ቁቀ ቁ ݈ܾܽ‫ݎݑ݋‬
relation absract
ሬԦଵ
‫ܮ‬
‫݇ݐܮ‬
‫ݐܮ‬ ሬԦ ‫ۊ‬
‫ܮۇ‬
‫ ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬ൌ ቀ ቁ ݈ܾܽ‫ ݎݑ݋‬ൌ ቌ ‫ ˃ݐܮ‬ቍ ݈ܾܽ‫ ݎݑ݋‬ൌ ‫ ۈ‬ଶ ‫ۋ‬
ሬԦ ൌ ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
‫ܮ‬
‫ݎܮ‬ ‫݇ݎܮ‬ ሬԦଷ
‫ܮ‬
‫˃ݎܮ‬ ሬԦସ ‫ی‬
‫ܮۉ‬

ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
‫ ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬vector names
Name 1 ‫ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬
Name 2 letter ‫ܮ‬
Its graph is as follows:

‫ݐܮ‬k Concrete labour - thing

ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
‫ ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬െ ܶ‫ܩܰܫܪ‬ Thing categories
‫ݐܮ‬a Abstract labour - thing
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
‫ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬
‫ˍݎܮ‬ Concrete labour-relation
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
‫ ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬െ ܴ‫ܱܰܫܶܣܮܧ‬ Ideal categories
‫˃ݎܮ‬ Abstract labour-relation

§ 1.3.3. The appearance of a four-dimensional vector ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ

COMMODITY

Definition. “Commodity” is a scalar. It is an auxiliary non-logical category. It is not a ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ

COMMODITY
vector name.
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦis the following vector:
Definition. The vector COMMODITY

ሬTԦ  ൌ ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ thing concrete

COMMODITY ൌ ቀ ቁቀ ቁ ܿ‫ݕݐ݅݀݋݉݉݋‬
relation absract

ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ ൌ ቀ ‫ ݐ‬ቁ ቀ݇ቁ ܿ‫ݕݐ݅݀݋݉݉݋‬

ሬԦ ൌ COMMODITY
T
ˍ ܽ
22 22

ܶሬԦଵ
ܶ‫݇ݐ‬
‫ ۇ‬ሬԦ ‫ۊ‬
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ ൌ ቀ ܶ‫ ݐ‬ቁ ܿ‫ ݕݐ݅݀݋݉݉݋‬ൌ ቌ ܶ‫ ˃ݐ‬ቍ ܿ‫ ݕݐ݅݀݋݉݉݋‬ൌ ܶଶ
ሬԦ ൌ COMMODITY
ܶ
ܶ‫ݎ‬ ܶ‫݇ݎ‬ ‫ ۈ‬ሬԦ ‫ۋ‬
ܶଷ
ܶ‫˃ݎ‬ ሬԦସ ‫ی‬
‫ܶۉ‬

ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ vector names

COMMODITY
Name 1 ‫ܻܶܫܦܱܯܯܱܥ‬
Name 2 letter ܶ

Its graph is as follows:

ʡ‫ݐ‬k Concrete form ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ

COMMODITY െ THING
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY െ ܶ‫ܩܰܫܪ‬ ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
ʡ‫ ˃ݐ‬Abstract form COMMODITY െ TNING
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY
ܶ‫ ݇ݎ‬Concrete form ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY െ ܴ‫ܱܰܫܶܣܮܧ‬
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY െ ܴ‫ܱܰܫܶܣܮܧ‬
ܶ‫ ܽݎ‬Abstract form ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY െ ܴ‫ܱܰܫܶܣܮܧ‬

ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ .
§ 1.3.4. The appearance of a two-dimensional vector ܸ‫ܧܷܮܣ‬

ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ category name is ʠ, not ܸ.

Attention. The ܸ‫ܧܷܮܣ‬
ܸ‫ ܧܷܮܣ‬is called ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
Definition. ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ ‫ ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬െ ܴ‫ ܱܰܫܶܣܮܧ‬embodied in ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY െ ܴ‫ܱܰܫܶܣܮܧ‬.

Therefore, we can replace the word ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ

COMMODITY െ ܴ‫ ܱܰܫܶܣܮܧ‬with the word ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ ܸ‫ ܧܷܮܣ‬.
 23
23

ܶ‫݇ݐ‬
ܶ‫ݐ‬
COMMODITY ൌ ቀ ቁ commodity ൌ ቌ ܶ‫ ݎݐ‬ቍ commodity
ሬԦ ൌ  ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
ܶ
‫ݎܥ‬ ‫݇ݎܥ‬
‫ܽݎܥ‬

Marx’s theorem: “VALUE is a special social-production RELATION of commodity producers”.

Note. According to the authors, it is not labour that creates value, but the LABOUR-RELATION. In
our opinion, it is a complete coincidence with Marx.

ʡ‫ݐ‬k ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
Thing concrete form of COMMODITY
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY െ ܶ‫ܩܰܫܪ‬ ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
ʡ‫ ˃ݐ‬Thing abstract form of COMMODITY
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY ʠ‫ ݇ݎ‬Use value (concrete) of ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY െ ܴ‫ܱܰܫܶܣܮܧ‬ ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ or just
Abstract value ofCOMMODITY
‫ܽݎܥ‬
the value of the commodity


‫ݐܮ‬k Thing concrete labour Thing catego-

ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
‫ ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬െ ܶ‫ܩܰܫܪ‬
‫ݐܮ‬a Thing abstract labour ries
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
‫ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬
‫ˍݎܮ‬ Concrete labour-relation
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
‫ ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬െ ܴ‫ܱܰܫܶܣܮܧ‬ Ideal categories
‫˃ݎܮ‬ Abstract labour-relation

Comparing two tables, we get Marx’s theorems.

Marx’s theorem:

1. Concrete labour-relation creates use value;

2. Abstract labour-relation creates value.

Marx simultaneously works in the four-dimensional and eight-dimensional spaces of categories.

And so Marx’s “CAPITAL” is difficult to study. It is necessary to completely abandon the four-
dimensional space of categories and work only in the eight-dimensional space of categories.

§ 1.4. The most incomprehensible theorem of Marx is “MONEY is the RELATION OF PEO-
PLE”

Marx’s theorem:
“Value is a special social-production relation of commodity producers… Gold forms only a con-
necting link between the metamorphoses of commodities and constitutes but their transitory money
form; furthermore, that it realizes the price of one set of commodities only in order to realize that of
another, but in no case does it constitute a stable form of exchange value or appear itself as a com-
modity in a state of rest. The reality which the exchange value of commodities acquires in the pro-
cess and which is represented by gold in its circulation, is the reality of an electric spark. Although
real gold, it plays the part of fictitious gold, and can, therefore, be replaced in this function by a to-
ken of itself”.
Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels. An Essay, Book 13, page 98.
24 24

According to Marx, VALUE is the RELATION OF PEOPLE, i.e., IDEAL, not material. People’s
relations are GREEDY, COMMANDING. Love and friendship are also relation of people. How to
understand Marx?
According to Marx:
1) CAPITAL is the RELATION (of people),
2) MONEY is the RELATION (of people),
3) PROPERTY is the RELATION (of people),
According to Lenin, CLASSES are the RELATION OF PEOPLE. How to understand that money is
the relation of people, if money is gold, it is material, and the relation of people is IDEAL. Is Marx
right? The leader is always right.
In the West, electronic money has replaced paper money. That is, the MONEY-THING has disap-
peared, there is no material money. And there is electronic money, but it is a spark in the computer!
Nothing has changed in capitalism, because Marx is right: “Money is the ideal, it is the greedy rela-
tions of people, and it is the spark in the computer.” Money is the mass greed of people.
If you take the greed of billions of people, you will get a huge idol out of them. This IDOL is the
world CAPITAL. According to Marx, MONEY is the COLLECTIVE GREED of people. The de-
struction of money is the DESTRUCTION OF THE COLLECTIVE GREED of billions of people,
the destruction of the terrible IDEAL one.
Hypothesis. Perhaps Marx’s commodity molecule consists not of one commodity, but of two com-
modity atoms. That is, the Marx’s commodity molecule is a diatomic molecule. After all, two peo-
ple or two commodities converge in the market.
To justify this hypothesis, it is necessary to find four independent parameters for each commodity.
Then the two atomic molecules will have eight independent parameters.
After that, it will be possible to combine the theory of diatomic molecule with the theory of eight-
dimensional space. And we consider the theory of eight-dimensional space to be correct.

What is good about the theory of a diatomic molecule?

In this case, Marx’s category of “RELATION” becomes explicit. We can say that it materializes.
“NOT A RELATION” means the property of one common commodity.
“RELATION” means that this category is a function of a diatomic molecule.

What is wrong with the theory of a diatomic molecule?

The authors carried out thermodynamic calculations based on a monatomic gas with two degrees of
freedom. And now we need to make calculations based on a diatomic molecule, and each atom must
have four degrees of freedom. There is no guarantee that such calculations will make political eco-
nomic sense.

§૚. ૞.The dialectical pair THING – RELATION in Hegel’s dialectic

Hegel’s Dialectical Pair: THING – RELATION:

The thing-relation pair is the main pair of Hegel’s dialectics. In philosophy, it is an ABSTRACT
PAIR, which has the highest degree of abstractness. Hegel first proves the dialectic theorems on this
 25
25

pair. And then he obtains the pairs: FAITH–MIND, WHOLE-PART, ART-SCIENCE. And he gets
new theorems.

Dialectics of the THING–RELATION pair

The THING–RELATION categories are dialectical, that is, VARIABLE categories. They are
functions of logical time. Their values are subject to change. They can pass into each other.
THING primary material phenomenon The RELATION category is more im-
portant than the THING category, be-
RELATION secondary ideal essence cause the sciences study ESSENCES.


§૚. ૟.Hegel’s theorem on the THING. Consequence: “Marx’s theorem of HUMAN”

Theorem:
1) The THING is the totality of all RELATIONS with other things, about other things.
2) The ESSENCE OF A THING is not in the thing itself, but in its RELATIONS.

Hegel describes the transition RELATION՜THING, according to the type of transitions: mag-
netismlelectricity (Faraday’s law of electromagnetic induction).

Marx’s theorem of HUMAN in political economy.

Theorem:
A (political economy) person in the WORLD OF ESSENCES is the totality of all his PRODUC-
TION RELATIONS with other people, about other people.
Definition: “The world is dual”.

The world is dual. Therefore, theorems and definitions must always exist in pairs. Marx gave only
one definition of man. He did not give a definition of a man in the world of PHENOMENON, and
this is wrong. Marx consciously gave theorems only from the world of ESSENCES. Why? The sci-
ences study essences, so theorems from the world of ESSENCES are more important than theorems
from the world of PHENOMENON.

Marx did not give definitions and theorems from the world of PHENOMENON for the sake of
brevity. So Engels and Hegel (sometimes) did the same. The theorems from the world of PHE-
NOMENON were to be given by the readers. It is time to add to Marx’s theorems the dual theorems
from the world of phenomenon. So Marx’s books will grow.

Lenin is an exception from the ranks of Hegel, Marx and Engels. Lenin set the task of formalizing
dialectics, and began to fulfill it himself. Lenin gave absolutely all his theorems and definitions,
such as matter, classes, states, in PAIRS both in the world of PHENOMENON and in the world of
ESSENCES.
26 26

The second direction in which Lenin led the formalization of dialectics is the COMPRESSION of
formulations to the INCOMPRESSIBLE, because the fundamentalization of knowledge is the com-
pression of the formulations of theorems to the incompressible.

Theorem. Definition of a person in psychology.

1) “A person (in psychology) in THE WORLD OF ESSENCES is the totality of all his PER-
SONAL RELATIONS (i.e., EXPERIENCES) with other people, about other people.
2) The essence of a person is stored not in himself, but in his relations with other people, about
other people.

The WORD theorem. We apply Hegel’s theorem to linguistics:

1) The WORD is the totality of all its RELATIONS (connections) with other words. That is, a
WORD is the totality of all its epithets.
2) THE ESSENCE of the WORD is contained not in itself, but in epithets and in connections
with other words.
A word is “a moving letter”. A sentence is “a flying word”. A story is “a sentence (idea) that moves
and develops in logical time”.

§૚. ૠ.The theory of RELATIVITY (the principle of relativity) is contained in Hegel’s DIA-
LECTICS

The principle of RELATIVITY is contained in the words

“only COMPARED WITH...”
The THING category is primary, but only COMPARED with the RELATION category,
The THING category is material, but only not absolutely
COMPARED with the THING category, not
RELATION is ideal, but only
absolutely.
A THING is a PHENOMENON, but the phe-
its own half of the RELATION category.
nomenon of
RELATION is ESSENCE, but the essence of only its half of the THING category.

Example. The FAITH–MIND categories are both ideal, not material. But according to Hegel’s
PRINCIPLE of RELATIVITY, we can assume that the FAITH category is material, compared with
MIND category.
Why does Marx have MONEY as the RELATION OF PEOPLE, i.e., ideal?
Now, with the help of Hegel’s principle of relativity, we can answer this question. Marx is right,
money is really something ideal, but COMPARED with…
In dialectics, theorems must always be in pairs. That is, both TRANSITIONS are always signed:
WAVEĺ PARTICLE and PARTICLEĺ WAVE. These transitions occur at different points in log-
ical time.
Marx describes only one transition. Why? A THING is defined through the RELATION, because
the RELATION is the ESSENCE of the THING. The sciences study essence, so the leader de-
scribes the most important part of the theory. The readers themselves should describe the second
 27
27

half of the theory. But the political philosopher Lenin always describes both TRANSITIONS, and
always formulates two theorems, not one.

§ 1.8. Hegel discovered the disease: “THING FETISHISM”

Signs of the disease “thing fetishism”:

1) The “sick” people consider both categories metaphysical, i.e., dead constants.
2) The “sick” people consider the THING category to be the ESSENCE of processes.
3) The “sick” people do not see the RELATION category or consider it the PHENOMENON.
4) The “sick” people see the whole world upside down.
Consequences of the disease.
The “sick” people see the whole world upside down. They look through a political economic, in-
verting lens. They take the essence for the phenomenon, and the phenomenon for the essence. They
consider the cause to be the consequence, and the consequence to be the cause. This disease is
widespread, and reduces millions of people, starting with the primitive savages with their magical
fetish amulets.

§ 1.9. Marx’s theory of capitalist fetishism. Fetishism No.1. The theory of THING-VALUE
FETISHISM

The authors clarified the name of this political economic disease: Marx called it commodity-money
fetishism, but now it is called “THING-VALUE FETISHISM”. Marx’s theory of fetishism is a
consequence of Hegel’s theory of thing fetishism.
GOLD-RELATION and GOLD-THING
The thing VALUE fetishist mistakes GOLD-THING for the real VALUE (money). But this is not
so: VALUE is not the GOLD-THING. The value is perfect, and it is enclosed within the GOLD-
THING. Gold-thing is a skin or carrier of real value.
The REAL VALUE is the GOLD-RELATION. The Marxist sees living people buried in GOLD-
THING as in a prison. He hears their groans: “Mighty brothers! Where are you? Help me”. The
Marxist considers these people, their lives and time, to be the real value; and gold-thing only a
golden skin, a golden prison for people-values.
At equilibrium, the calculations of the Marxist and the fetishist coincide. But it turns out that the
fetishists are wrong in transition processes (in crises). VALUE is not GOLD-THING.
Example. There is an isolated market where the treasure was found. The volume of gold money has
doubled, and the total VALUE has not changed.

Example. Thing fetishists consider the coal (THING) to be thermal energy. But this is not so: if
there is no oxygen, then it is impossible to extract thermal energy from coal. So the thermal energy
that contained in the coal is actually NOT THING, but RELATION. And ENERGY-RELATION is
the relation of coal to other substances.
Those who are sick with commodity-money fetishism consider the Golden Idol (THING) to be a
real god. They believe that he is powerful, eternal, immortal. From morning to evening, the prayers
of fitishism believers are heard: “And, Olla, dollar. And, Olla, dollar”. The priests of this terrible
religion sacrifice millions of people to their insatiable Golden Idol in countless warriors. And they
also want to sacrifice our magical Earth.
28 28

§ 1.10. The eight-dimensional space of Marx categories ષૡ . Second order laws

§ 1.10.1. The appearance of an eight-dimensional vector ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ

ࡸ࡭࡮ࡻࢁࡾ.

ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦis the following vector:

Definition. The vector ‫ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬
ሬԦ ൌ ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ ‫݇ ݇ ݐ‬
‫ܮ‬ ‫ ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬ൌ ቀ ቁ ቀ ቁ ቀ ቁ ݈ܾܽ‫ฺ ݎݑ݋‬
‫ܽ ܽ ݎ‬

ሬԦ ൌ ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ ‫݄݃݊݅ݐ‬ ܿ‫ݎݑ݋ܾ݈ܽ݁ݐ݁ݎܿ݊݋ܿ ݁ݐ݁ݎܿ݊݋‬

‫ܮ‬ ‫ ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬ൌ ቀ ቁቀ ቁቀ ቁ
‫ݎݑ݋ܾ݈ܽݐܿܽݎݐݏܾܽ ݐܿܽݎݐݏܾܽ ݊݋݅ݐ݈ܽ݁ݎ‬
‫݇݇ݐܮ‬
‫ܽ݇ݐܮ‬
‫݇ݐܮ‬ ‫ۊ ݇ܽݐܮ ۇ‬
‫ݐܮ‬ ‫ۈ‬ ‫ۋ‬
‫ ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬ൌ ቀ ቁ ݈ܾܽ‫ ݎݑ݋‬ൌ ቌ ‫ ܽݐܮ‬ቍ ݈ܾܽ‫ ݎݑ݋‬ൌ  ‫ݎݑ݋ܾ݈ܽ ۋ ܽܽݐܮ ۈ‬
ሬԦ ൌ ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
‫ܮ‬
‫ݎܮ‬ ‫݇ݎܮ‬ ‫ۋ ݇݇ݎܮۈ‬
‫ܽݎܮ‬ ‫ۋܽ݇ݎܮۈ‬
‫݇ܽݎܮ‬
‫یܽܽݎܮۉ‬

Its graph is as follows:

‫݇݇ݐܮ‬ Thing twice-concrete labour

‫ܽ݇ݐܮ‬ Thing concrete-abstract labour
Thing categories
‫݇ܽݐܮ‬ Thing abstract-concrete labour
‫ܽܽݐܮ‬ Thing twice -abstract labour
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
‫ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬
‫݇݇ݎܮ‬ Twice concrete labour-relation
‫ܽ݇ݎܮ‬ Concrete-abstract labour-relation
Ideal categories
‫݇ܽݎܮ‬ Abstract-concrete labour-relation
‫ܽܽݎܮ‬ Twice abstract labour-relation
 29
29

§ 1.10.2. The appearance of an eight-dimensional vector ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
‫ܻܶܫܦܱܯܯܱܥ‬

Definition. The vector ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ

‫ ܻܶܫܦܱܯܯܱܥ‬and its graph:
ሬԦ ൌ ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ ‫݇ ݇ ݐ‬
T ‫ ܻܶܫܦܱܯܯܱܥ‬ൌ ቀ ቁ ቀ ቁ ቀ ቁ commodity ฺ
‫ܽ ܽ ݎ‬

ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ ൌ ቀ ‫ ݄݃݊݅ݐ‬ቁ ቀܿ‫݁ݐ݁ݎܿ݊݋‬ቁ ൬ܿ‫݁ݐ݁ݎܿ݊݋‬commodity൰

ሬԦ  ൌ ‫ܻܶܫܦܱܯܯܱܥ‬
T
‫ݐܿܽݎݐݏܾܽ ݐܿܽݎݐݏܾܽ ݊݋݅ݐ݈ܽ݁ݎ‬commodity
ܶ‫݇݇ݐ‬
ܶ‫ܽ݇ݐ‬
ܶ‫݇ݐ‬ ‫ۊ ݇ܽݐܶ ۇ‬
ܶ‫ݐ‬ ‫ۈ‬ ‫ۋ‬
‫ ܻܶܫܦܱܯܯܱܥ‬ൌ ቀ ቁ ܿ‫ ݕݐ݅݀݋݉݉݋‬ൌ ቌ ܶ‫ ܽݐ‬ቍ ܿ‫ ݕݐ݅݀݋݉݉݋‬ൌ  ‫ݕݐ݅݀݋݉݉݋ܿ ۋ ܽܽݐܶ ۈ‬
ሬԦ ൌ ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
ܶ
ܶ‫ݎ‬ ܶ‫݇ݎ‬ ‫ۋ ݇݇ݎܶۈ‬
ܶ‫ܽݎ‬ ‫ۋ ܽ݇ݎܶۈ‬
ܶ‫݇ܽݎ‬
‫یܽܽݎܶۉ‬
Vector graph ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
‫ ܻܶܫܦܱܯܯܱܥ‬is as follows:

ܶ‫ ݇݇ݐ‬Thing twice-concrete form ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ

COMMODITY
ܶ‫ ܽ݇ݐ‬Thing concrete-abstract form ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ ܶ‫ ݇ܽݐ‬Abstract-concrete form
COMMODITY െ THING
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY െ THING
ܶ‫ ܽܽݐ‬Twice-abstract form
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY െ THING
COMMODITY
ܶ‫ ݇݇ݎ‬Twice-concrete form
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY െ RELATION
ܶ‫ ܽ݇ݎ‬Concrete-abstract form
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY െ RELATION ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY െ RELATION
ܶ‫ ݇ܽݎ‬Abstract-concrete form
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY െ RELATION
30 30

ܶ‫ ܽܽݎ‬Twice-abstract form
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY െ RELATION

THE MAIN POLITICAL ECONOMIC GRAPH

Here we combine the graph of the vector ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ

‫ ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬and the graph of the vector ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY into
one graph. It is the main political economic graph.
‫݇݇ݐܮ‬
‫ܽ݇ݐܮ‬
‫݇ݐܮ‬ ‫ۊ ݇ܽݐܮ ۇ‬
‫ݐܮ‬ ‫ۈ‬ ‫ۋ‬
‫ ܴܷܱܤܣܮ‬ൌ ቀ ቁ ݈ܾܽ‫ ݎݑ݋‬ൌ ቌ ‫ ܽݐܮ‬ቍ ݈ܾܽ‫ ݎݑ݋‬ൌ  ‫ݎݑ݋ܾ݈ܽ ۋ ܽܽݐܮ ۈ‬
ሬԦ ൌ ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
‫ܮ‬
‫ݎܮ‬ ‫݇ݎܮ‬ ‫ۋ ݇݇ݎܮۈ‬
‫ܽݎܮ‬ ‫ۋܽ݇ݎܮۈ‬
‫݇ܽݎܮ‬
‫یܽܽݎܮۉ‬

ܶ‫݇݇ݐ‬
ܶ‫ܽ݇ݐ‬
ܶ‫݇ݐ‬ ‫ۊ ݇ܽݐܶ ۇ‬
ܶ‫ݐ‬ ‫ۈ‬ ‫ۋ‬
‫ ܻܶܫܦܱܯܯܱܥ‬ൌ ቀ ቁ ܿ‫ ݕݐ݅݀݋݉݉݋‬ൌ ቌ ܶ‫ ܽݐ‬ቍ ܿ‫ ݕݐ݅݀݋݉݉݋‬ൌ  ‫ݕݐ݅݀݋݉݉݋ܿ ۋ ܽܽݐܶ ۈ‬
ሬԦ ൌ ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
ܶ
ܶ‫ݎ‬ ܶ‫݇ݎ‬ ‫ۋ ݇݇ݎܶۈ‬
ܶ‫ܽݎ‬ ‫ۋ ܽ݇ݎܶۈ‬
ܶ‫݇ܽݎ‬
‫یܽܽݎܶۉ‬

§ 1.10.3. The appearance of a four-dimensional vector ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ

VALUE

Definition. VALUE ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ is called LABOUR ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ

െ RELATION embodied in
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY െ RELATION.
Therefore, we can replace the words ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY െ RELATION with the word VALUE ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ:
 31
31

ܶ‫݇݇ݐ‬
ܶ‫ܽ݇ݐ‬
ܶ‫݇ݐ‬ ‫ۊ ݇ܽݐܶ ۇ‬
‫ۈ‬ ‫ۋ‬
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ ൌ ቀ ܶ‫ ݐ‬ቁ ܿ‫ ݕݐ݅݀݋݉݉݋‬ൌ ቌ ܶ‫ ܽݐ‬ቍ ܿ‫ ݕݐ݅݀݋݉݉݋‬ൌ  ‫ݕݐ݅݀݋݉݉݋ܿ ۋ ܽܽݐܶ ۈ‬
ሬԦ ൌ ‫ܻܶܫܦܱܯܯܱܥ‬
ܶ
ܶ‫ݎ‬ ʠ‫݇ݎ‬ ‫ۋ ݇݇ݎܥۈ‬
‫ܽݎܥ‬ ‫ۋ ܽ݇ݎܥۈ‬
‫݇ܽݎܥ‬
‫یܽܽݎܥۉ‬

Marx’s theorem: “VALUE is a special social-production RELATION of commodity producers”.

ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
ܶ‫ ݇݇ݐ‬Thing twice-concrete form COMMODITY
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
ܶ‫ ܽ݇ݐ‬Thing concrete-abstract form COMMODITY
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY െ THING ܶ‫ ݇ܽݐ‬Abstract-concrete form
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY െ THING
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY ܶ‫ ܽܽݐ‬Twice-abstract form COMMODITY ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
െ THING
ʠ‫ ݇݇ݎ‬Twice -concrete value of commodity
ʠ‫ ܽ݇ݎ‬Concrete-abstract value of commodity
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
ܸ‫ܧܷܮܣ‬ ʠ‫ ݇ܽݎ‬Abstract-concrete value of commodity
‫ ܽܽݎܥ‬Twice-abstract form of value of commodity.
Value of commodity according to Marx

The political economic meaning of the vector ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ

ܸ‫ܧܷܮܣ‬

ʠ‫ ݇݇ݎ‬Twice concrete value Labour value

ʠ‫ ܽ݇ݎ‬Concrete-abstract value Use value
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
ܸ‫ ܧܷܮܣ‬ൌ ሬʠԦ ʠ‫ ݇ܽݎ‬Abstract-concrete value Money value
‫ܽܽݎܥ‬ Value of commodity in Marx’s
Twice abstract value
“CAPITAL”. Abstract value

The category of “value” in Marx’s “CAPITAL”

ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ . We have:
It is the fourth coordinate of the vector ܸ‫ܧܷܮܣ‬
ࡹࢇ࢘࢞࢜ࢇ࢒࢛ࢋ࢏࢙ ൌ ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
ࢂ࡭ࡸࢁࡱ૝ ൌ ࡯࢘ࢇࢇ ൌ ࢚࢝࢏ࢉࢋࢇ࢈࢙࢚࢘ࢇࢉ࢚࢜ࢇ࢒࢛ࢋ.
But for the authors, the word “value” is an auxiliary category. There is a definition to avoid confu-
sion.
Definition. The value will be called abstract value in Marx’s CAPITAL. This definition is a non-
logical definition.
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ has four states. The exclusion principle is valid.
The vector ܸ‫ܧܷܮܣ‬
Theorem. At every moment of political economic time, the vector ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
ܸ‫ ܧܷܮܣ‬can only be in one of its
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
four states. The vector ܸ‫ ܧܷܮܣ‬cannot be simultaneously in two or more states.
32 32

The proof of the theorem is as follows. At any moment of logical time small-scalle producer can act
only in one of four states: producer, seller, buyer, consumer. The purchase of a commodity occurs
before the consumption of the commodity in the logic of the process. Although for a ɫommodity-
service purchase and consumption may coincide in physical time.

Why is it undesirable to use Marx’s four-dimensional theory?

Theories Four-dimensional spaceȳସ Eight-dimensional spaceȳ଼

Labour value
Use value
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ Use value
ܸ‫ܧܷܮܣ‬
Money value
Abstract value
Marx’s abstract value

Here, we can see that the use value in a four-dimensional space is a vector in an eight-dimensional
space:
Labourvalue ሺȳ ሻ
Usevalueሺȳସ ሻ ൌ ቀ ቁ ଼
Usevalue
Analogically, an abstract value in a four-dimensional space is a vector in an eight-dimensional
space:
Moneyvalue
Abstractvalueሺȳସ ሻ ൌ ቀ ቁ ሺȳ଼ ሻ
Abstractvalue
Results: the same word in the spaces ȳସ andȳ଼ has different meanings and different forms.

§ 1.10.4. The secret of Marx: “What does Marx mean by the word FORM?”
The Marx’s category FORM means the vector coordinate.

The answer is that under the word FORM Marx means “VECTOR COORDINATE”. The first form
is the first vector coordinate. The second form is the second vector coordinate.
‫݈ܽ݅ݐ݊݁ݐ݋݌‬
‫ܻܩܴܧܰܧ‬. We have: ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
Example. There is the vector ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ ‫ ܻܩܴܧܰܧ‬ൌ ቀ ቁ ݁݊݁‫ݕ݃ݎ‬.
݇݅݊݁‫ܿ݅ݐ‬

the first coordinate

The potential energy is of the vec-
the first form (Marx)
tor
the second coordinate ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
Kinetic energy is ‫ܻܩܴܧܰܧ‬
the second form (Marx)

ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ is not a vector, it is a dialectical pair:

‫ܻܩܴܧܰܧ‬

But the use of vectors makes it possible to simplify the presentation of Marx’s CAPITAL.
 33
33

Therefore, we can say that the first coordinate of the vector ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
ܸ‫ ܧܷܮܣ‬is the first form, the second co-
ordinate is the second form. This presentation will exclude logical contradictions.

Contradictions in the authors’ designation system.

The purpose is to create a unified designation system for political economy and physics. In addi-
tion, the designation system must be consistent with the Russian and English languages. The task
is difficult and it is not solved. So, contradictions have arisen in the authors’ designation system.

Categories Letters to indicate categories

Why the letter Because the letters In Russian and English
‫ܥ‬
Value ʠ and not the ܸ are the volume of languages:
letter ܸ? gas in physics
Consumer Total heat
The contradiction is that value and consumer mass (total heat
mass in capacity in
‫ܥ‬ capacity) are denoted by the same letter. Yes, it is. So, we have
political physics
to enter new letters.
economy
Why the letter ܶ and not Because in Russian:
ɋommodity ܶ
the letter ‫?ܥ‬
Because in Russian:
Why the letter ݇ and not
concrete ݇
the letter ܿ?

Dialectical pair: ݇
ቀ ቁ
concrete-abstract. ܽ
34 34

Chapter II. The small-scale market as an ideal political economic gas with two degrees of
freedom
§ 2.1. Axioms of a market ideal political economy gas with two degrees of freedom

1. It is the money market. All prices are expressed in grams of gold.

2. Small-scale producers are independent from each other.
3. They are commensurate with each other.
4. There are no hired workers.
5. Only one commodity is sold and bought on the market. For example: “a pair of boots”. That
is, boots are changed to boots in the market.
6. If the exchange is made without money, then such a market is called VALUE MARKET.
7. If the exchange is made by money, then such a market is called MONEY MARKET. But the
real money is gold.
8. ɋommodities are sold once.
9. The market works one day (one month, one year).
10. ɋommodities are consumed at the moment of purchase or a second after purchase.

§ 2.2. Table of analogies between political economy and thermodynamics

ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY Political Economy Physics
Thing categories. COMMODITY ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ ൌ COMMODITY െ THING.
Logical categories Non-logical categories.
A labour THING. Commodity mass. Meters of
‫ܯ‬
Thing twice- fabric. Tons of wheat.
ܶ‫ ݇݇ݐ‬concrete form of ܰ Number of commodities. Mass
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY The quantity of labour (Marx) as a THING, as a
ܸ௧
mass of commodities. Labour thing hours.
‫˔ܯ‬௏ A consumer THING. The total consumer mass
in the equilibrium state. The total heat capacity of Thermal
Thing concrete- ܰ݇௧ the market. mass.
ܶ‫ ܽ݇ݐ‬abstract form of Total
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ ‫ܥ‬ heat ca-
COMMODITY The total consumer mass of commodities in the
ߜܳ pacity.
ൌ transition process.
݀ߠ
Thing abstract- Thermal
Money THING. The real money supply of mar-
concrete form of energy
ܶ‫݇ܽݐ‬ ܳ௧ ket as a THING. Grams of gold. Determined after
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY as a
sales
THING
Thing twice- Abstract THING is GOLD. GOLD as a THING, Work is
as gold bar. Grams of gold. VALUE AS A energy
ܶ‫ ܽܽݐ‬abstract form of ܼ௧
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ THING, like a piece of gold. Real work of real as a
COMMODITY people. THING
Value categories. COMMODITY ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ ൌ COMMODITY െ RELATION.
Twice-concrete
Labour value. Marx’s “a quantity of labour” as
‫ ݇݇ݎܥ‬value of ܸ ൌ ܸ஼ Volume
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ the volume of labour. Labour value hours.
COMMODITY
‫ ܽ݇ݎܥ‬Concrete- S Use value Entropy
 35
35

abstract value
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
ofCOMMODITY
Abstract- Thermal
Money value. energy as
ʠ‫ ݇ܽݎ‬concrete value ܳ஼
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ Money supply of market as a value a RELA-
ofCOMMODITY TION
Twice-abstract Abstract value of Marx. Gold is as a value. Work is
The VALUE is as the real work of real people. energy as
‫ ܽܽݎܥ‬value of ܼ஼
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ Value in Marx’s CAPITAL a RELA-
COMMODITY TION.

§ 2.3. The half of the main political economic graph is the vector graph ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY

The left half of the graph contains thing categories, and the right half of the graph contains value
categories.

§ 2.4. Non-logical name systems. Definition of the VALUE category

Theorem. The value in Marx’s CAPITAL is the eighth coordinate of the vector ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY and
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
the fourth coordinate of the vector ܸ‫ܧܷܮܣ‬ସ :
‫ ܽܽݎܥ‬ൌ ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY଼ ൌ ‫ܥ‬ ሬሬሬሬԦସ ൌ ܸ‫ܧܷܮܣ‬
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦସ .
It is ABSTRACT value. Non-logical name system is as follows:
ܸ஼ labour
ܵ consumer
‫ܥ‬Ԧ ൌ ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
ܸ‫ ܧܷܮܣ‬ൌ ൮ܳ ൲ ൌ ቌ money ቍ value.
஼
ܼ஼ abstract
Thus, it is necessary to create a SPECIALIZED MATHEMATICAL LOGIC for Marx’s CAPITAL.
So we need mathematicians-logicians.
36 36

It is impossible to create a mathematical model of the world economy according to Marx’s “CAPI-
TAL” without specialized mathematical logic. We are working for mathematicians and logicians
who will undertake this hard work. And we try to make all categories unambiguous.
It should be different from classical mathematical logic. Why? Should it also include simplified
Russian (English, German)?
What for? In order to be able to obtain Marx’s theorems by reading graphs. The embryos of such
languages are available in databases. They are called languages for reading ER diagrams. They are
arranged as follows: a certain number of words are selected from the Russian language. These
words are placed on the edges or nodes of the ER diagram. After that, some of the words are de-
clared as verbs, nouns or adjectives.
Then the theorems of database theory can be obtained by reading ER diagrams. Is there currently a
developed language for reading ER diagrams?
No, there is not. Why? These languages are made by engineers. And we need mathematicians-
linguists who will create an axiomatic language for reading ER diagrams.

§ 2.5. Marx’s theorems in the eight-dimensional space of categoriesെષૡ

Here we combine the two graphs and get the Marx theorems.

No. Categories Value theorems Physics

Theorem The abstract value of the commodityܼ஼ is created Work. Work as
No.1. ܼ஼ relation
by twice abstract LABOUR-RELATION

Theorem The money value of commodity (price-value) ܳ஼ is Thermal energy.

No.2. ܳ஼ created by abstract-concrete LABOUR- Thermal energy
RELATION as a relation.
Theorem The use value of commodity ܵis created by con-
No.3. ܵ Entropy
crete-abstract LABOUR-RELATION

Theorem The labour value of commodity (price-value) -

No.4. ܸ஼ ܸ஼ is created by twice concrete LABOUR- Volume
RELATION
Thing theorems
Theorem The value MASS as THING, as gold bar ܼ௧ is cre- Work. Work as
No.5. ܼ௧ THING.
ated by twice abstract THING LABOUR

Theorem Thermal energy.

The money MASS (price-thing) ܳ௧ is created by
No.6. ܳ௧ Thermal energy
abstract-concrete THING LABOUR
as a THING.
Theorem Total heat ca-
The consumer commodity MASS ‫ܯ‬௧ ܿ௩ , ܰ݇, ‫ܥ‬is
No.7. ‫ܯ‬௧ ܿ௩ , ܰ݇, ‫ܥ‬ pacity. Thermal
created by concrete-abstract THING LABOUR
mass
Theorem The commodity MASS ‫ܯ‬௧ is created by twice
‫ܯ‬௧ Mass
No.8. concrete THING LABOUR
 37
37

Theorems
1 Use value is entropy.
The consumer mass is the total heat capacity of the
market
2
Consumer commodity mass is a thermal mass (Total
heat capacity).

The subtleties of philosophy.

We know that philosophy is not commutative. The subtleties of philosophy are that the meaning of
a sentence can change from the permutation of words in a sentence.
There are two formulations of the same theorem.
Theorem 8a. The commodity MASS ‫ܯ‬௧ is created by twice concrete THING LABOUR.
Theorem 8b. The commodity MASS ‫ܯ‬௧ is created by THING twice concrete LABOUR.
In a logical sense, these theorems may not be equivalent, what is bad. It is necessary to choose one
of these theorems. This means that we must always take into account that it is not the commutativity
of political economy that generates many different versions, and we have to stick to just one ver-
sion.

§ 2.6. Thing category ࡹ ൌ ࡹ࢚ െ“Labour thing”. Mass of commodities

It is also the variable ܰ. It is also the variable ܸ௧

An ideal political economic gas is a market with the same type of commodities. There is only one
commodity on the market. For example, a pair of boots: the boots are exchanged for boots. All
commodities are absolutely identical, and they have the same quality. If the same commodities have
different quality, then the market must average them. But this means that we must also average a
mathematical model.
Example. There are 100 tons of bad tea on the market, which is equivalent to 60 tons of average tea
across the country, on the world market. If one ton is one molecule, then we put M=N=60 mole-
cules into the mathematical model.
Marx’s political economy does not describe a real market where 100 tons of various teas were sold.
Marx’s political economy is a virtual, abstract model of the market.
Question. Is it possible to determine the commodity mass M(N) by calculation before the first com-
ing of the market?
Yes, it is. This is the task of the non-political “Commodity Science”. How is the average molecule
determined? How is the average quality tea determined? The quality of tea is determined by chemi-
cal composition: caffeine, vitamins, minerals. Then we average over the amount of tea on the mar-
ket.
Example. The car after-market. 100 old cars were thrown onto this market.
Can “Commodity Science” determine an old car of average quality before the first coming of the
market?
Yes, it can: The quality of the car is determined by car longevity, mileage and the careful car-
ownership. So, the commodity science has determined that 100 old machines give only 30 commod-
ity molecules. We put ܰሺ‫ܯ‬ሻ ൌ 30 in the mathematical model of Marx’s Capital.
38 38


An old car is a molecule, a virtual car is determined by averaging across the country.
Lemma 1. The number of virtual old cars will be equal to the number of real old cars when aver-
aged across the country.
Lemma 2. But in another market, the number of virtual old cars, the number of cars-molecules may
not coincide with the number of real cars. Thus, Marx’s Capital is a virtual science.
Question. Does it turn out that we do not see the real sale of a real old car? This task is dealt with by
commodity science and economics in the accounting sense.
Political economy deals with mass quantities, classes. Applied sciences are engaged in the fate of an
individual person or good.
Lemma. The total calculations of political economy and commodity science will coincide with the
accounting economy.
But why do we need calculations of political economy?
Political economy calculations are the ESSENCE of accounting economics calculations. Account-
ing economics deals only with PHENOMENON, or even with the APPEARANCES of phenome-
non (according to Hegel). It cannot explain the crises. It cannot explain anything at all. And it can-
not predict anything. So, the commodity mass M(N) can be determined by calculation before the
first coming of the market.

The consumer mass is the total heat capacity of the gas.

ఋொ
During the transition process, it is calculated by the formula: ʠ ൌ . But what does ‫ܿܯ‬௩ , ܰ݇ have
ௗఏ
to do with the use value? The authors could not formulate an exact and unambiguous definition of
use value. They leave this task to physicists. In the meantime, we consider one of the three formulas
as the use value:

ߜܳ
ʠൌ – ‫ݏݏ݈ܽ݉ܽ݉ݎ݄݁ݐ‬, ‫ݕݐ݅ܿܽ݌ܽܿݐ݄݈ܽ݁ܽݐ݋ݐ‬
ඎ ݀ߠ
‫ܿܯ‬௩ 
ܰ݇

It is no longer possible to determine the consumer mass by calculation before the first coming of the
market. It is the thermal mass or the total heat capacity of the gas. In fact, it is the heat capacity of
the entire market.
Although it can be determined by calculation after the first coming of the market.
Objection. If the commodity mass M(N) can be determined without a market, so it is not a capitalist
category. But the following axiom is true.
Axiom. All categories in the political economy of capitalism are capitalist categories.
So the commodity mass M(N) can be determined only after the first coming of the market.

The problem of expensive and cheap cars in the same market.

Example. There are both expensive and old cars on the car market. How can we average it? If there
are two different classes of buyers in this market, we have two different markets.
Question. Is it possible to include all the commodities of a large state in one market model?
 39
39

It is possible, but we need to reduce all the commodities to one abstract thing commodity. And we
have it. It is a worker. We can take one labour hour for one molecule. So we consider that labour
times are sold on the market instead of things. We also need to include class models in the model,
but it is not known whether such a model is possible or impossible.
Thing category ܸ௧ is labour thing. The quantity of labour as a commodity MASS. The unit of meas-
urement is “labour thing hour”. So ܸ௧ ൌ ܸʠ , but it can differ from each other in transition processes.
We are still not convinced of the existence of the ܸ௧ category. Further, the commodity mass we un-
derstand as the category M = 8000 tons of wheat.
Transition processes are the second coming of the market. The purpose of political economy is to
study transition processes. Logical problems cannot be resolved without the theory of two market
comings.

§ 2.7. Value category ࢂʠ is labour value. Labour volume

Value category ܸ஼ is labour value. A quantity of labour is as LABOUR VOLUME, as labour

VALUE. Unit of measurement is “labour value hour”.
If 10 workers work for 8 hours 12 days and collect 8000 tons of wheat, quantity of labour as VAL-
UE is equal to:
ܸʠ ൌ 10 ‫ כ‬12 ‫ כ‬8 ൌ 960 labour value hours.
The labour value category answers the question: “The labour value of what?”. In this case, the la-
bour value of 8000 tons of wheat is equal to 960 labour value hours.

§ 2.8. Thing category ࡽ࢚ is money thing. The total money supply. Thermal energy is as
THING, as tons of coal.

It is determined after sales. This is the real money of the real work of the market in one day. It is
measured in grams of gold.

§ 2.9. Value category ࡽ࡯ is money value, or value contained within total money thing ࡽ࡯ .
Thermal energy is as energy.

It is obvious that ܳ஼ , ܳ௧ may not coincide with each other.

§ 2.10. Thing category ࢆ࢚ is total VALUE (abstract) THING, total VALUE (abstract) THING-
GOLD, with real VALUE inside.

It has the shape of a gold bar, the shape of a THING. This is a gold bar with labour hours inside.
The great wizard CAPITAL turned people into a golden sculpture. But people have not died yet.
We can feel their hearts beating. We hear their voices: “Mighty brothers! We are still alive. Help!
Break the Golden Idol”.

§ 2.11. Value category ࢆ࡯ is total abstract VALUE. The energy obtained through the real
work of real people. NEW VALUE
Abstract value ܼ஼ is contained within the GOLD-THING, but it is not a GOLD-THING. The value
of real work of real people.
40 40

Example. There is an isolated market. There someone finds a large quantity of gold. The total
quantity of gold doubles, but the total value remains the same.

§ 2.12. Thing category ࡹࢉࢂ is consumer mass (thing). In the transition process, it is the total
heat capacity of the market -࡯. Thermal mass.
ఋொ
It is the total heat capacity of the market ൌ . If we apply additional amounts of money ߜܳ to the
ௗఏ
market, the heat capacity of the market can be calculated from the market reaction. The statistics of
international markets are so huge. It is possible to calculate the heat capacity of the market using the
similarity theory, without resorting to experiments.

§ 2.13. Value category ࡿ. The theorem. Entropy is the use value.

Theorem. The use value is the entropy ܵ. VALUE of what?

Valueofvalue. No.
ቂ
ValueofTHING. Yes.
Lemma. Entropy ܵ is the use value of a consumer thing C. So entropy is the value of thermal mass,
the value of the total heat capacity C. Entropy is the value of the body’s heat capacity.

Small-scale market as an ideal political economy two-dimensional gas

Political economy Physics
ܰ A labour thing. The number of similar commodities. Three forms: the number of
‫ܯ‬ Commodity mass. molecules, mass and time
The total commodity mass. Tons of wheat or hundreds of as a labour thing. But the
meters of fabric. Thing category existence ܸ௧ is questiona-
ܸ௧ The total labour hours as a thing. Labour thing hour. ble. It probably does not
Commodity mass. exist.
Labour value. The total labour hours as a value. Labour
ܸ஼ Volume
value hour. Labour volume
Money value of unit consumer mass of commodities (not
ߠ Temperature
a commodity). Price.
ܼ ൌ ܰ݇ߠ Internal VALUE of market gas ܷ internal energy
The total money value of all commodities. It is deter-
ܳ ൌ ܰ݇ߠ Energy in thermal form
mined after sales.
Three times abstract value (VALUE). Universal constant
‫݌‬ Pressure
of human value
Three times abstract value is VALUE. Real labour of
‫ ܣ‬ൌ ‫ܸ݀݌‬ Labour
additional people. NEW VALUE
ܵ The total use value Entropy
Two Boltzmann constants:
The use value is not a unit of commodity, not a unit of
Entropy unit:
݇஼ ൌ 1 commodity mass, but a unit of consumer (thermal) mass.
ܵ ൌ ݇஼ ‫݊ܮ‬ሺܹ).
Value category
 41
41


Unit of consumer mass at constantܸ஼ . Thing category. Thermal mass unit (heat
1 ൌ ݇௧
capacity of a body):
ൌ ˔௏
Heat capacity at constant labour valueܸ஼ ܳ ൌ ܰ݇௧ ߠ.

‫ܿܯ‬௏ Thermal mass. The total

Consumer mass. Thing category. heat capacity of the gas in
ܰ݇௧ The total consumer gas mass in equilibrium. equilibrium
The total consumer mass in the transition process: The total heat capacity of
ఋொ
‫ܥ‬ ‫ܥ‬ൌ the gas in the transition
ௗఏ
process
˔௣ ൌ 2 Heat capacity at constant pressure
ܰ஺ ൌ 1 The Avogadro constant
ܴൌ1 Universal gas constant

The total heat capacity and the total entropy form a dialectical pair:

Therefore, these transitions: entropy ՜ heatcapacity, heatcapacity ՜ entropy give important

theorems of thermodynamics.

࢑࢚
§ 2.14. Two Boltzmann constants. ൬ ൰ . The value (entropy) Boltzmann constant ࢑࡯ is a unit
࢑ࢉ
of use value. The thing Boltzmann constant (heat capacity) ࢑࢚ ሺ࢕࢘ࢉࢂ ? ሻ is unit of consumer
mass

They form a dialectical pair:

The value Boltzmann constant ݇஼ is the unit of entropy in the Boltzmann formula: ܵ ൌ ݇஼ ‫݊ܮ‬ሺܹሻ.
In political economy, it is a unit of use value. The thing Boltzmann constant ݇௧ ሺ‫ܿݎ݋‬௏ ? ሻ is the unit
of heat capacity of a body in the formula ܳ ൌ ܰ݇௧ ߠ. It is a unit of thermal mass. In political econ-
omy, it is a unit of consumer mass with a constant volume of labour value ܸ஼ .
Some inaccuracies are possible here. But physicists will be able to correct these inaccuracies.

§ 2.15. Verbal description of the categories of the halves of the main political economic graph
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
- the graph of a vector ۱‫۽ۻۻ۽‬۲۷‫܇܂‬
 42

42

How can categories be compared? Answer: according to the principle of relativity.

Categories can be twice thing, twice value, once thing, once value. When comparing categories according to the principle of relativity, it is nec-
essary to add the phrase “COMPARED TO...”

Thing categories compared to Value categories

compared to
once value
‫ܯ‬௧ െ twicethingcategory ܼ஼ – twice value category

compared to once thing categoryܵ

thing category
‫ ܯ‬ൌ ‫ܯ‬௧ is once
ܸ஼ is once thing category compared to
ry‫ܿܯ‬௏

compared to
thing category
‫ܯ‬௧ ܿ௏ is once
once thing category‫ܯ‬௧ ܵ is once thing category compared to once thing categoryܸ஼
 43


Description of categories

Abstract thing – Three times abstract

Commodity thing Consumer thing Money thing Labour value Use value Money value
gold bar value of a person

Commodity mass. Consumer mass The total money Labour value. Use value Money value Three times abstract
‫ܯ‬௧ ‫ܥ‬ ܳ௧ ܼ௧ ܸ஼ ܵ ܳ஼ ܼ஼

Tons of grain. The total heat supply of real thing, as a value The volume of value. This is the real
ܼ௧ is gold as a

capacity of the commodities on carrier labour time.

labour of real people.
market: the market. This is the value of a
person.
ܼ஼

a thing, as a
ߜܳ ܳ௧ is money as
‫ܥ‬ൌ
value carrierܳ஼
ተ ݀ߠ
‫ܿܯ‬௩ 
ܰ݇
43
44 44

How to number categories in complex dialectical pairs: “Bottom up or top down?” That is how
we need:

In this paper, we do not adhere to a strict numbering system for categories. It is more correct to
put the primary categories to the bottom in dialectical pairs. But in mathematics, the numbering
of the elements of vectors goes from top to bottom. It is a contradiction.
In this matter, mathematics is more important than political economy. We need to number it
from top to bottom. At the top are the thing categories, and the value (ideal) ones are at the bot-
tom. The graphs nodes are numbered from left to right.
 45
45

Chapter III. Five theories of thing fetishism

§3.1. The first theory of thing fetishism. Fetishism No.1. Karl Marx’s theory of THING-
ࢆ
VALUE FETISHISM. Dialectical pair ൬ ࡯ ൰ ൌ ܏‫ ܍ܝܔ܉ܞ܌ܔܗ‬െ ܏‫܏ܖܑܐܜ܌ܔܗ‬ሺ‫ܚ܍ܑܚܚ܉܋܍ܝܔ܉ܞ‬ሻ
ࢆ࢚

The main political economy graph contains four dialectical pairs:

These dialectical pairs give us four theories of thing fetishism.

ܼ
Dialectical pair: ൬ ஼ ൰. Category ܼ஼ is the total VALUE.
ܼ௧

Value ܼ஼ is an es-
Secondary Ideal compared The consequence,
ܼ஼ sence of gold – thing
compared to... to... compared to...
ܼ௧
Primary Gold – thing ܼ௧ is a
Material The cause,
ܼ௧ compared to... compared to... phenomenon of val- compared to ...
ue ܼ஼ .

A “sick” thing fetishist confuses cause and consequence. He understands value as gold - thing.
But the disease is found only in the transition process.
The task. Hegel’s theory of TRANSITIONS. Examine transitions: ܼ஼ ՞ ܼ௧ . Each transition is a
great theorem. Marx called this disease a commodity-money fetishism. But authors called this
disease a commodity-value fetishism or thing-value fetishism.

§3.2. The second theory of thing fetishism. Fetishism No.2. The theory of THING MON-
ࡽ
EY fetishism. Dialectical pair: ൬ ࡯ ൰ ൌ money supply as a value and as a thing (value car-
ࡽ࢚
rier)

ܳ
Dialectical pair: ൬ ஼ ൰. Category ܳ௧ is the total real money supply from the sold commodities
ܳ௧
within one day or one month. ܳ஼ is the amount of real values, which are inside the real money
ܳ ܼ
supplyܳ஻ . Obviously, the pair ൬ ஼ ൰ does not coincide with pair ൬ ஼ ൰in the transition pro-
ܳ௧ ܼ௧
cess/emergency situations.
Example. There are some interruptions in the supply of food and prices has instantly increased.
Traders benefit because the profit are much higher than the real value of their commodities. Al-
so the rate of gold money can change.

But the categories ܳ஼ , ܳ௧  may also not coincide with each other. A “sick” thing fetishist un-
derstands the thing category ܳ௧ as an essence.
Task 1. The logical scheme needs to be filled with real political economic content. It is neces-
sary to give examples of a sick thing fetishist who confuses the categories ܳ௧ andܳ஼ .
46 46

Task 2. Hegel’s theory of TRANSITIONS. Examine TRANSITIONS: ܳ௧ ՞ ܳ஼ . Each transi-
tion is a great discovery.

§3.3. The third theory of thing fetishism. Fetishism No.3. The theory of THING CON-
ܵ
SUMER fetishism. Dialectical pair: ቀ ቁ: use value and thing (carrier)
‫ܥ‬

݇஼ is unit of en-
tripy in the
ܵ is the total use ݇஼ is unit of use
Entropy Boltzmann formu-
value value
la
ܵ ൌ ݇஼ ‫݊ܮ‬ሺܹሻ
݇௧ is unit of con- Thermal mass .
‫ ܥ‬is the total
sumer mass in the is the total Is it ܿ௩ in the for-
consumer mass:
formula heat capacity mula‫ܿܯ‬௩ ?
ߜܳ
‫ܥ‬ൌ ܳ ൌ ܰ݇௧ ߠ of the entire
݀ߠ gas (body)

Physicists will be able to describe this disease better than authors. Note: commodity mass ‫ܯ‬௧
and consumer thing (mass)‫ ܥ‬are different categories.
Theorem. Entropy is the value of heat capacity.

§3.4. The fourth theory of thing fetishism. Fetishism No.4. The theory of THING LA-
BOUR fetishism.

ࢂ ࢂ
§3.4.1. Dialectical pair: ቀ ቁ ൌ ൬ ࡯ ൰ is labour value and labour thing (carrier)
ࡹ ࡹ࢚

ܸ ൌ ܸ஼ is the total labour time as a There is no thing fetishism. No one will

value confuse these two categories. But there
should be two or four theories of fetishism.
‫ ܯ‬ൌ ‫ܯ‬௧ is the total commodity mass And there cannot be three of them. It is con-
as meters of fabric or tons of wheat tradiction, and it must be resolved.

§3.4.2. Is there a universal market molecule?

We are studying an ideal political economic gas, i.e., a small-scale market where only one
commodity is sold and bought. For example, boots. Boots are changed to boots. The market
with five commodities is a mixed gas. But thousands of commodities are sold on the real mar-
ket. The calculation of a mixed gas with 1000 different types of molecules will be very diffi-
cult. Is there a universal commodity molecule?
At first glance, a universal commodity exists, and it is gold. After all, gold is a commodity of
commodities, it is a universal commodity. But gold functions as a value, as a half of a universal
commodity. And there is no second half.
Hegel. The philosophy of law.
Hegel’s theorem. “By alienating the whole of my time, as made concrete through work, and the
totality of my production, I would be making the substantial quality of the latter, i.e. my univer-
sal activity and actuality, or my personality itself”.
 47
47

Consequence 1. According to Hegel, from the point of view of the essence, the worker of capi-
talism is also a slave. And it is true. The worker of capitalism is a money slave.
Consequence 2. According to Hegel, a small-scale producer sells his essence on the market, so
he sells himself.
According to Hegel, we can assume that a small-scale producer sells his labour time on the
market ܸ௧ . In this case the commodity mass is not tons of wheat, it is the total thing labour time.
The half of the main political economic graph can be as follows:

ܸ ܸ
Dialectical pairቀ ቁ can be as follows: ൬ ஼ ൰ Units of measure
‫ܯ‬ ܸ௧
ܸ஼ is the total labour time ܸ஼ is twice the value category
Labour value hour
as a value compared toܸ௧
ܸ
൬ ஼൰ ܸ௧ is the total labour time ܸ௧ is twice the value category
ܸ௧ Labour thing hour
as thing, as mass compared to ܸʠ
Categoriesܸ௧ , ܸʠ have different dimensions.

Lemma. The category commodity MASS (thing) ܸ௧ and the category labour value ܸ஼ do not
coincide numerically during crises.
If the value of one labour thing hour is equal to two grams of gold, then the universal market
molecule (if it exists) will be as follows:

If an expensive car costs 1000 labour hours, then it can be represented as 1000 molecules. And
here we see that it is easy to confuse the categories ܸ஼ andܸ௧ , and sick labour fetishists will
definitely do it. Thus, we have restored the number of theories of thing fetishism. There are
four of them now. One contradiction has resolved, but there is a new problem.
Category ‫ ܯ‬ൌ ‫ܯ‬௧ is the commodity mass. It is measured in meters of fabric or tons of wheat.
And if we enter the ܸ௧ category instead of ‫ܯ‬௧ category as COMMODITY MASS, then one unit
of measurement will disappear. And this is very bad. There are two options.
48 48

‫ܯ‬
Option No.1. There is no ܸ௧ category and ܸ஼ ൌ ܸ. Dialectical pair: ቀ ቁ. There is no universal
ܸ
market molecule.
Option No.2. There is ܸ௧ category. And there is universal market molecule. Dialectical pair:
ܸ
൬ ௧ ൰. There is no more one unit of measurement.
ܸ஼
Results. The question of the existence of a universal market molecule is still open. In the future,
we will not be looking for a universal market molecule. So now we understand commodity
mass as tons of wheat or meters of fabric. We need simplify the notation system:
‫ܯ‬௧ ൌ ‫ܯ‬, ܸ஼ ൌ ܸ.

§ 3.5. The fifth theory of thing fetishism. Fetishism No.5. The theory of socialist (state) fet-
ishism of Marx-Lenin

This theory is also a consequence of Hegel’s theory of thing fetishism. It is stated in the works
of Hegel, Marx, Engels, Lenin. Lenin’s book is “The State and the Revolution”.
Hegel’s theorem. In the world of ESSENCES, the STATE is ideal, it is the RELATION of
people (classes).
Hegel’s theorem. In the world of ESSENCES, the STATE is “PARTICULAR WILL OF IN-
DIVIDUALS”.
According to Hegel, in the world of essences, the STATE is a COMMAND, the state is a UNI-
TY of COMMAND, the state is the COMMANDED RELATION of PEOPLE.
Consequence. The COMMAND and the UNITY of COMMAND is the ESSENCE of the
STATE.
Hegel gave only half of the definition of the state: only in the world of ESSENCES. And there
is no definition of the state in the world of PHENOMENON. Lenin always gives all the defini-
tions and theorems in pairs.
The second half of Lenin’s theorem.
Theorem. The state in the world of PHENOMENON is a THING, this is the police, this is the
army, these are the courts, these are the chiefs. The state is a dialectical pair:

The STATE-THING is the courts, the army, the police, the chiefs. STATE-RELATION is the
production relation of people in the state. In the state, people communicate with each other not
in a human way, not as humans. They communicate with each other by COMMANDS, like ro-
bots, like machines.
And when millions of people turn to each other with COMMANDS, then a GREAT IRON
ROBOT STATE is born. And this robot is a LIVING MACHINE. No one controls it, not min-
isters, not presidents, not Stalin. The state grows itself. The state is a living iron robot. Stalin
did not rule the STATE. He faithfully served his iron God STATE. Through its greatest priest,
Stalin, the Socialist State fulfilled its historical destiny and went down in history.
 49
49

The great Hegel is the first person in history who gave the correct definition of the STATE. But
no one knows Hegel. Hegel is still the unknown leader of mankind. One more time we repeat
Hegel’s theorems:
Definition of the STATE. Hegel.
In the world of essences, the STATE is “PARTICULAR WILL OF INDIVIDUALS”.
In the world of essences, the STATE is the COMMAND, it is the COMMANDED RELA-
TIONS OF PEOPLE.
The essence of the state is in the COMMAND.
The essence of the state is the STATE-RELATION, this is the commanded relation of people.
From the point of view of the essence, the state is a command, it is the UNITY of COM-
MAND.

Hegel’s theorem. In the world of essences, the

The world of ES- STATE is a COMMAND, it is a UNITY of
SENCES COMMAND, it is a commanded relation of
people.
The world of The state is courts, army, police, officials,
PHENOMENON chiefs.

Marx. Communism is the abolition of the state, including the socialist state. The commune is a
global community.
Returning to the community according to Hegel’s triad:
Community (primitive)՜state՜ scientific community.
According to Hegel, the state is not an army, not the police, not the courts. No, the state is an
COMMAND. What is the cause of violence in the modern world? Answer: the police, the ar-
my.
Hegel replies: “This is not true”. The state is neither the army nor the police. And the cause of
violence is neither the army nor the police. The cause of violence is the COMMAND and
UNITY of COMMAND. People, bound together by COMMANDS, turn into a huge iron robot
– the state.
The theorem of Marx and Hegel
The destruction of the state does not mean the destruction of the army and the police. The de-
struction of the state is the DESTRUCTION of the COMMAND.
Under communism, the army and the police become Communes of Brothers. All decisions are
made by the COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE. The violence disappears. Hegel’s theorem says
that communism is possible in a separate state.
Sick thing fetishists did not study Hegel, and they do not know the Hegel’s theory of the state.
They think that real state is STATE-THING, what means: courts, army, police. And these peo-
ple get sick with a mental illness called THING FETISHISM. They see the whole story upside
down.
These sick thing fetishists are faithful Stalinists. They worship their IRON IDOL – the Socialist
State. They do not believe in any communism. And they are not going to build communism.
They consider communism to be the great iron robot machine of the Socialist State. They con-
50 50

sider their IRON IDOL to be a real god, powerful, eternal, immortal. Therefore, the Stalinists
destroyed all the thousands of Communes that Lenin had founded.
It is impossible to combine communism and socialism. Communism is a stateless system, it is a
system without a leader. Communism is a GLOBAL COMMUNITY. Under communism, the
Supreme Soviet, the General Staff, ministries, factories, schools, hospitals, divisions will be-
come Communes of brothers. Issues will be solved by COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE, not
by issue. The UNITY OF COMMAND will be destroyed.
These are the mistakes made by the theory of socialist state fetishism. Stalinists: “Stalin won
the war. Stalin built factories”.
The Stalinists understand the POWER of the PEOPLE in the hands of the State as the POWER
of the state itself. They do not understand simple things. They do not understand that all the
victories of socialism were won only because workers believed in The Socialist State, and they
considered The Socialist State a just system.
It is time for the second coming of Lenin. Lenin said: “Any state is NOT A PEOPLE’S state”.
The socialist state has fulfilled a historical role, and has ceased to be a deity for the working
people. So, it is time for a new deity.
The working people stopped supporting the socialist state, and without such great support, the
socialist state was blown away by the historical wind. And it turned out that the socialist state
has no power anymore.
The Stalinists became metaphysical fanatics. They were living machines, they were parts of
their iron robot. Machines do not have minds. That is why the Stalinists had a big problem.
Their eternal and all-powerful God-state had disappeared. At first, this great iron ROBOT per-
formed feats, saved the country and all of humankind. And then he was gone. “Stalin, Stalin” –
called the Stalinists their great Iron God. But there was silence in response. Socialism died of
old age. It has fulfilled his historical duty. Socialism was no longer possible, and was no longer
needed. He honestly passed his valiant and noble path.
Communism was built bypassing socialism. The socialist king, General Secretary, was dead!
Long live the new queen:
“GLOBAL SCIENTIFIC COMMUNE!”
All theories of fetishism are consequences of the Hegel’s theory of THING FETISHISM. We
need the eight-dimensional space of Marx’s categories to include the theory of fetishism in the
general logical scheme.

§3.6. Table of thing fetishistic theories

Fetishism theories
ʋ Dialectical pairs Political economy sick THING
thing
fetishists
Marx’s theo-
ry of ܼ஼ is value
1 Sick people take the GOLD-
THING-
ܼ௧ is gold-thing that con- THING for VALUE - ܼ௧
VALUE
FETISHISM tains value
ܳ஼ is the value that is con- Sick thing fetishists take mon-
2 MONEY tained within a money ey-thing for real wealthQ ௧ .
thingܳ௧ But they are wrong. The real
 51
51

wealth is the valueQ େ , which
࢚ܳ is real money supply. It
is contained in the money sup-
is determined after sales.
ply.
Sick thing fetishists take a
S is use value (entropy)
consumer thing for a use val-
ue.
? ఋொ They take the heat capacity of
3 CONSUM- ‫ ܥ‬ൌ is consumer thing the body for entropy.
ௗఏ
ER (thermal mass). The theorem. Entropy is the
value of the thermal mass, the
‫ܥܯ‬௏ , ܰ݇? value of the heat capacity of
the body.

ܸ is labour value of the Hypothesis. Category ܸ௧ ex-

commodity mass ‫ܯ‬ ists. Then there will be a theo-
ry of labour fetishism, and
4 LABOUR there will be sick labour fetish-
MሺV௧ ሻis labour thing, ists. It is still unknown. The
commodity mass existence of a universal mole-
cule ܸ௧ has not been proven.
Hegel’s theorem. In the world
of essences, the state is a state-
The theory relation, it is an COMMAND,
of socialist it is a commanded relations of
5 (state) fet- people
ishism Sick thing fetishists consider
the state to be a state-thing:
courts, army, police.
Examine TRANSITIONS: BASIS՞ SUPERSTRUCTURE
Theorem. Thing fetishism is a political economic inverting lens. And this lens turns all phenom-
enon upside down in the representation of the thing fetishist.

How to apply the theory of thing fetishism in life?

The Stalinists say: “The people are to blame”. We turn this statement over and get: “The state is
to blame”. It has fulfilled its historical duty. It has become old, so it is gone.
Question. Can an optical lens turn over only one thing and not all? It cannot. The political eco-
nomic inverting lens also cannot turn over some statements, and not turn over other conclu-
sions.
Marx’s theorem. Thing fetishism is an inverting lens.
This theorem was discovered by Marx. The authors have established that this theorem is a uni-
versal logical law. At certain moments of logical time, all pairs are turned over without excep-
tion. A detailed description of the theory of inverting a pair is in the book of the authors. Thing
fetishist are totally useless idiots.
52 52

Chapter IV. Axiomatization of the VALUE, not MONEY MARKET

§ 4.1. Small-scale value market as an ideal two-dimensional political economic gas

The value market is a market where people pay with VALUES, not with gold money.
MARX’S CATEGORY “QUANTITY OF LABOUR”െܸ஼ .
Dialectical pair:

‫ ܯ‬ɫategory is commodity mass. It is measured in tons of wheat or meters of fabric. This is a

real category. ܸ஼ ɫategory is value category. Marx called it “THE QUANTITY OF LABOUR”,
but the value of what?
Answer. Commodity mass ‫ ܯ‬tons of wheat costs ܸ஼ labour hours. The production of ‫ ܯ‬tons of
wheat costs ܸ஼ value labour hours.
The quantity of labour ܸ஼ is labour inputs. The quantity of labour is measured by VALUE LA-
BOUR TIME. If the commodity took an average of 100 hours, then the quantity of labour ܸ஼ is
100 value labour hours. The labour hour and the physical hour do not coincide. Why?
Worker packs the commodities in bags. The time, which spent on packing and carrying heavy
loads, is labour time; it creates value. The time, which spent manipulating money, is parasitic
time; it creates no value.
The director of the clinic is a practicing surgeon. The time, which spent on operations, is labour
time, and the time, which spent on management, is parasitic time.
The QUANTITY OF LABOUR ܸ஼ is measured in labour value hours. This category is an ana-
logue of the concept of VOLUME from physics. The quantity of labour is the volume of spent
labour.
Units of measure

The quantity of labour. The volume of Name on

Categories spent labour. Units of measure
the graph
The volume of gas in physics –ܸ
ܸ௧ The quantity of la- Thing category ܶ௧௞௞ Thing labour
ሾ‫݄ܮݐ‬ሿ
bour as a THING. hour
The quantity of la- Value labour
ܸ஼ bour as a RELA- Value category ܶ௥௞௞ ሾ‫݄ܮܥ‬ሿ
hour
TION.

For mathematicians
Philosophy and political economy are not commutative. Therefore, the expressions “thing la-
bour hour” and “labour thing hour” may not be equivalent. But there is only one truth.
Suggestion. Within the framework of creating a minimal political economy, we suggest to call
the category ܸ஼ not the quantity of labour, but the volume of labour.
VALUE is denoted as ܷ. The unit of value is denoted as 1[C].
 53
53

THE AXIOM OF VALUE. If the market is large, isolated and equilibrium, then we can as-
sume that the QUANTITY of LABOUR and the VALUE are approximately EQUAL, so
ܷ ؆ ܸ஼ .
The category VALUE is born in a total form, as the total value. And only then, a small part of
the value is selected for the commodity.
There is the birth of the value of the only one commodity. The total value is denoted as ܷ. The
value of the commodity is denoted as ܷଵ , and the quantity of similar commodities is denoted as
ܰ. It is for similar commodities:
U
Uଵ ൌ .
N
 54

54

Half of the main political economy graph looks as follows:

‫ܯ‬ ‫ܥ‬ ܳ௧ ܼ௧ ܸ ܵ ܳ஼ ܼ஼

Labour thing Consumer thing Money thing Value thing Labour value Use value Money value Value
ܶ௧௞௞ ܶ௧௞௔ ܶ௧௔௞ ܶ௧௔௔ ‫ܥ‬௥௞௞ ‫ܥ‬௥௞௔ ‫ܥ‬௥௔௞ ‫ܥ‬௥௔௔

Commodity Thermal mass. To- A real mass of Gold bar, which Labour vol- Entropy Energy Work. Real
mass‫ܯ‬. Tons of tal heat capacity of money. It is deter- contains the ume. transferred work of real
wheat or meters gas mined after sales value Labour value by heat people. New
of fabric ߜܳ hour. value

Thing categories, but only compared to the right side of the graph. It is still a Value categories, but only compared to the left side of the
‫ܥ‬ൌ
݀ߠ

question what kind of relation they have. graph. It is still a question what kind of relation they have.

The main market in the world of essence is THE VALUE MARKET, not THE MONEY MARKET.
Definition. The VALUE MARKET is an abstract market in which payment is made directly by the VALUE. The laws of the value market should be
studied above all, because MONEY is only a SUPERSTRUCTURE over VALUE.
 55
55

§ 4.2. The functioning of the VALUE, not the money market

The VALUE, not the money market

Small-scale
pair of boots The quantity of labour Dimension Commodity
producers
The first ܰଵ ൌ 4 ܸଵ ൌ 9ሾ‫݄ܮ‬ሿ
The second ܰଶ ൌ 5 ܸଶ ൌ 10ሾ‫݄ܮ‬ሿ ሾ‫݄ܮܥ‬ሿ െ
Commodity is
Value
The third ܰଷ ൌ 6 ܸଷ ൌ 11ሾ‫݄ܮ‬ሿ pair of boots
labour hour
ܰ ൌ ܰଵ ൅ ܰଶ ൅ ܰଷ ൌ 15 ܸ ൌ ܸଵ ൅ ܸଶ ൅ ܸଷ ൌ 30
Exchange rule: BOOTS are exchanged for BOOTS
The main task: “HOW ARE THE VALUES DISTRIBUTED?”

Solution. The total quantity of pairs of boots:

ܰ ൌ ܰଵ ൅ ܰଶ ൅ ܰଷ ൌ 4 ൅ 5 ൅ 6 ൌ 15
The total quantity of labour. In labour hours, the quantity of labour is equal to:
ܸ ൌ ܸଵ ൅ ܸଶ ൅ ܸଷ ൌ 9 ൅ 10 ൅ 11 ൌ 30
According to the AXIOM of VALUE, the total quantity of labour and the total value are equal
to:ܷ ൌ ܸ . We get the total VALUE: ܷ ൌ 30values. The value of one pair of boots is equal to:
௎
‫ ݏ‬ൌ ൌ 2 values.
ே

Value distribution table

Small-scale The quantity of

Values Relation
producers labour
ܷ ‫ܥ‬ଵ 8
The first ‫ܥ‬ଵ ൌ ܰ ൌ 8ሾ‫ܥ‬ሿ ܸଵ ൌ 9ሾ‫݄ܮ‬ሿ ߠଵ ൌ ൌ
ܰ ଵ ܸଵ 9
ܷ ‫ܥ‬ଶ 10
The second ‫ܥ‬ଶ ൌ ܰ ൌ 10ሾCሿ ܸଶ ൌ 10ሾ‫݄ܮ‬ሿ ߠଶ ൌ ൌ ൌ1
ܰ ଶ ܸଶ 10
ܷ ‫ܥ‬ଷ 12 1
The third ‫ܥ‬ଷ ൌ ܰ ൌ 12ሾCሿ ܸଷ ൌ 11ሾ‫݄ܮ‬ሿ ߠଷ ൌ ൌ ൌ1
ܰ ଷ ܸଷ 11 11

The first shoemaker lost this game. He actually worked 9 labour hours, but got only 8 values. The
second shoemaker did not lose or win. The third shoemaker won. He worked 11 labour hours, but
got 12 values.
We have got the distribution of values by labour hours. In the value model of the market, this distri-
bution should be set axiomatically, as Maxwell did. It follows from the law of the unity of the world
that there must be a fundamental value constant in political economy.
Labour hours are called value labour hours.
56 56

§ 4.3. The axiom of the FUNDAMENTAL VALUE CONSTANT

To derive the FUNDAMENTAL VALUE CONSTANT, we make the following assumptions:

1. It is the VALUE market. Payment is made by the value. There is no money yet.
2. The market is equilibrium and isolated.
3. We study an ideal gas.
4. We study the work of a large market for a certain period of time.
The total quantity of labour is equal to ܸ, ɚnd the total value of commodities sold on the
market is equal to ܷ.
Definition. The fundamental value constant is called:
ܷ
‫݌‬ൌ
ܸ
Discussion. According to the axiom of value:
ܷ ൎ ܸ
Consequence. The fundamental value constant of the value equilibrium market is equal to one:
ܷ
‫݌‬ൌ ൌ 1.
ܸ
The political economic sense of the FUNDAMENTAL VALUE CONSTANT.
Hegel’s theorem. To appropriate a person’s working time means to appropriate his ESSENCE.
METHODS
From the point of view of Hegel’s theorem, THE ESSENCE of a person IS IDENTICAL to his
WORKING TIME. Therefore, ܷrepresents a society of political economic people. Therefore, the
VALUE is the ENERGY of the HUMAN (society) in political economy.
Here are the formulas for two-dimensional physical thermodynamics:
Internal energy: ܷ ൌ ܴܶ ൌ ܰ஺ ݇ܶ.
Here is a table of analogies between an ideal gas with two degrees of freedom and the value market.
Definition. We consider one commodity as one mole:
ܰ஺ ൌ 1, ݇ ൌ ݇஼ ൌ ݇௧ ൌ 1, ܴ ൌ 1, ܿ௏ ൌ 1݇, ܿ௉ ൌ 2݇.
Let us remind: value is denoted as C, not ܸ.
Units of measurement. The logical measurement system is set by the main political economy graph.
It is unmistakable. Now we turn to the physical and political economic system of units. And there
are possible some mistakes.
The value in Marx’s CAPITAL on the graph was denoted as ‫ܥ‬௥௔௔ . It is the fourth coordinate of the
vector ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
VALUE. For brevity, we called it an abstract value. The word “value” was an auxiliary cate-
gory.
Let us simplify the notation system. We will call the value in the Marx’s CAPITAL just “value”.
 57
57

Political
Categories Formulas Dimensions Analogies
economy
The
The labour value of the
quantity of ܸ஼ ሾ‫݄ܮܥ‬ሿ Value labour hour Volume
entire commodity mass
labour
Internal gas
The total value Value ܷሾʠሿ
energy

The value produced by

the real work of real Value ‫ܣ‬ሾʠሿ Value Gas work
people

ܳ െheater
Money value Value οܳ
energy
Fundamental constant ܷ ‫ܥ‬ ܸ݈ܽ‫݁ݑ‬ ‫ ݌‬െmarket
? ‫݌‬ൌ ൤ ൨
of human value ܸ ‫݄ܮܥ‬ ܸ݈ܽ‫ ݎݑ݋݄ݎݑ݋ܾ݈ܽ݁ݑ‬pressure
‫ܯ‬ Meters of fabric or tons of wheat Mass
Commodity mass
Number of
ܰ thing
molecules
‫ܿܯ‬௏ The thermal
mass. The to-
Consumer mass ܰ݇ Thing categories tal heat ca-
pacity
‫ܥ‬ is‫ ܥ‬ൌ .
ఋொ
ௗఏ
Money value of con-
ߠ Temperature
sumer mass units. Price
Heat capacity The unit of consumer mass in the for- Unit of heat
݇௧ ‫ܿ ؠ‬௏ ?
Boltzmann constant mula capacity
Use value ܵ Entropy
The unit of use value in the formula:
Boltzmann’s entropy ܵ ൌ ݇஼ ‫݊ܮ‬ሺܹሻ Unit of
݇஼
constant entropy
Labour value of unit ܸ஼
of consumer mass (not ? ?
a commodity) ܰ݇
The labour value of the ܸ஼
Value labour hour
commodity unit ܰ
The labour value of the ܸʠ Valuelabourhour
commodity mass unit ‫ܯ‬ Meteroffabric

ࢁ
A logical contradiction in the definition of a fundamental constant: ࢖ ൌ .
ࢂ

The category ܸ ൌ ܸ஼ is the value category in our model. But the value should answer the question:
“The value of what?”. Therefore, the value can only be the value of the thing. There is no value of
value. But we have defined the fundamental constant precisely as the value of value. What should
we do then?
58 58

The labour value ܸ஼ has a logical name on the main political economic graph: ‫ܥ‬௥௞௞ . Thus, the la-
bour value category is once a value and twice a thing category. And the value categoryܷ has the
logical name ‫ܥ‬௥௔௔ . It is three times the value category. According to the principle of relativity, the
labour valueܸʠ compared to ܷ category is a double thing category.
Formal abbreviation of fractions:
‫ ܽܽ ܽܽݎ‬twiceanabstractcategory, comparedto
ൌ ൌ
‫݇݇ ݇݇ݎ‬ twiceathingcategory, comparedto
Note 1. It was not easy to accept the hypothesis that the fundamental value constant is an analogue
of pressure. All the time we wanted to take it for a temperature. But, then the ideal gas law did not
work.
Note 2. We took the price of the commodity in energy units as the market temperature. We believe
that only one commodity is sold on the clear market. And if there are several commodities, then you
need to consider a mixed gas, consisting of several different gases.
Note 3. The fundamental value constant is equal to one, only in stationary conditions. In transition
processes, it will differ. All equations are written in differentials in transition processes:
ܷ݀ ൌ ݀ሺ‫ܸ݌‬ሻ ൌ ܸ݀‫ ݌‬൅ ‫ܸ݀݌‬.
Crises are transition processes. In crises, unsold commodities are destroyed, and the total value can
remain unchanged. This means that in crises: ‫ ് ݌‬1.

List of value categories

‫ܣ‬ ‫݌‬ ‫ܥ‬௥௔௔ Marx’s abstract value Pressure, work
ܳ஼ ߠ ‫ܥ‬௥௔௞ Money value Temperature, thermal energy
Entropy and the Boltzmann entropy
ܵ ݇஼ ‫ܥ‬௥௞௔ Use value
constant.
ܸ஼ ܸ ‫ܥ‬௥௞௞ Labour value Volume of labour

List of thing categories.

Twice abstract
ܼ௧ ܶ௧௔௔ A gold bar as a THING, as a carrier of VALUE
THING
The real money supply as a THING, as a carrier
ܳ௧ ܶ௧௔௞ Money THING
of money value. It is determined after sales
Consumer THING Thermal mass. The total heat capacity of the
‫ܥ‬ ܶ௧௞௔ ఋொ
(consumer mass) market (gas):‫ ܥ‬ൌ
ௗఏ
Commodity mass. Tons of wheat or meters of
‫ܯ‬ ܶ௧௞௞ Labour THING
fabric
 59
59

Joint list of thing and value categories
ܼ The abstract valueܼ஼ is the value of an The abstract thingܼ௧ (gold bar) contains an
൬ ஼൰
ܼ௧ abstract thingܼ௧ (gold bar) abstract value ܼʠ
ܳ The money valueܳ஼ is the value of a The money thingܳ௧ contains the money val-
൬ ஼൰
ܳ௧ money thingܳ௧ ueܳ஼ . It is determined after sale.
The use value (entropy) ܵ is the value The consumer thing‫ܥ‬ሺ‫ܥܯ‬௏ , ܰ݇ሻ contains
ܵ
ቀ ቁ of the consumer thing ‫ܥ‬ሺ‫ܥܯ‬௏ , ܰ݇ሻ the use valueܵ. The theorem. Entropy is the
‫ܥ‬
(thermal mass) value of the total heat capacity.
ܸ ܸ The labour valueܸ஼ is the value of the The labour thing‫ܯ‬, ܸ௧ contains the labour
൬ ஼ ൰ , ቀ ஼ ቁ,
ܸ௧ ‫ ܯ‬labour thing ‫ܯ‬ሺܸ௧ ሻ valueܸ஼

The thing coal contains thermal energy (value).

1) This thermal energy is the thermal value of coal.

2) This thermal energy (value) is not identical to coal-thing.
3) Marx’s theorem “VALUE IS A RELATION (of people or things)”
4) Consequence. The thermal value of coal is the RELATION of coal to other SUBSTANCES.
If there is no oxygen, then there is no value (thermal energy).
If there is little oxygen, then coal-thing contains little thermal value.
5) The thing fetishist identifies value (thermal energy) with coal-thing; he sees the whole world
upside down. The thing fetishist takes the consequence for the cause.
6) The thing fetishist is a mentally ill person, a person with an upside-down mind. But thing fet-
ishism is not a medical mental illness; it is a political economic mental illness. From the point
of view of medicine, the thing fetishist is an absolutely healthy person.
7) Attacks of the disease of thing fetishism occur in transition processes. In these processes, it is
clear that the fetishist is completely inadequate.

Theorem.
1. The Boltzmann’s entropy constant is a unit of USE VALUE.
2. The Boltzmann’s entropy constant is not a unit of commodity, not a unit of commodity mass, but
a unit of consumer (thermal) mass.
After all, we have a market for only one commodity, for example, “pair of boots”. The molecule of
our market is “pair of boots”. We exchange boots for boots. The market with various commodities
is a mixed political economy gas.

§ 4.4 Half of the main political economy graph is the graph of unit values of the vector
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY.
Lenin’s theorem. Categories must be derived!
There are only the total values on the graph of vector ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
COMMODITY. This graph is obtained by mul-
tiplying three pairs:
60 60


There is no temperature and pressure on the graph, but they must be there. How can we do it? Fol-
lowing Lenin, it is necessary to specify some logical process that leads from the total values to unit
values. We have not found such a process, but we set the graph of unit values:

Here is a possible way to switch to unit values. There is a market, which contains one copy of the
commodity with individual characteristics. There is nothing to exchange it for. If we are given the
fundamental constants, then all the other market parameters can be derived, but we will not do this.
We want to give a list of extensive quantities and point out that not all of them are independent.
Therefore, not all of them will be unit. You need to set the basic values and calculate all the other
values.

Description of the categories of unit graph

Thing categories
݉ Unit of commodity mass Unit of mass ݉
˔௏ , ݇௏ Unit of consumer mass Unit of heat capacity ˔௏ , ݇௏
ߠ௧ A piece of gold that has a money value Thing temperature ߠ௧
‫݌‬௧ A piece of gold that has an abstract value Thing pressure ‫݌‬௧
Value categories Energy categories
‫ݒ‬௖ The value of a labour thing hour Unit of volume ‫ݒ‬
Boltzmann’s entropy
݇஼ Unit of use value ݇஼
constant
The money value of unit of consumer
ߠ஼ Temperature ߠ
mass
‫݌‬஼ Abstract value of unit of use value Pressure ‫݌‬
 61
61

A new logical problem

The values ‫݌‬, ߠare pressure and temperature. They are value (energy) values. But now we
have the thing pressure ‫݌‬௧ and the thing temperature ߠ௧ .
There are no such values in physics. And we need to explain this contradiction. After all, one such
small contradiction can destroy the entire work of the authors.
Question
There must be discrepancies between physical thermodynamics and political economic thermody-
namics, and they must be found.
In physical thermodynamics, only transition processes make sense. This is not the case in econom-
ics. The total values (gross product) are important in the economy.
The authors doubt about the question: “WHAT IS THE VALUE?”

The authors have written a whole book. However, doubts do not leave them even in the very first
question. So, the main question is: “What is the value?”
Version No.1. The total value is the total internal energy.
Version No.2. The total value in transition processes is only a WORK, so by value, we mean only
the newly created value. Maybe the whole secret of value is kept in transition processes?
Question. Energy and pressure have different dimensions. So the fundamental value constant p
(pressure) is not a value. Is this a good thing or a bad thing?

Answer: ܼ஼ ɫategory is the total value of the total labour value ܸ஼ .

Therefore, the value pେ is the value of a unit of labour value Vେ .
Pressure is the energy value of a unit of volume.

§ 4.5. The LAW OF VALUE and the ideal gas law of Mendeleev-Clapeyron are one and the
same law

The ideal gas law of Mendeleev-Clapeyron for the VALUE market

Theorem. The ideal gas law of Mendeleev-Clapeyron is equations of state for the “ideal political
economy gas” market.
Thus, both the physical ideal gas and the political economic ideal gas obey the same equation:
ܷ ൌ ‫ ܸ݌‬ൌ ܰ݇ߠ.
PRICE category is mathematical expectation of a theoretical random variable. A specific price of
sold commodity is experimental, statistical manifestation of this theoretical random variable.
Theorem. The equations of the market state are described by the ideal gas law in energy units:

Firstversion pVେ ൌ NkɅ;

ฬ
Secondversion pVେ ൌ M˔୚ Ʌ

The ideal gas law has three value categories and one thing category
‫݌‬ Abstract value Value category
ߠ Money value Value category
62 62

ܸ஼ Labour value Value category
ܰ݇ Thing category. Thermal mass. The total heat capac-
‫ܿܯ‬௏ ity of the body in the equilibrium state
Consumer mass
The total heat capacity of the body in the transition
ʠ
processes

Some categories are three times value, other categories are three times thing, and so on. It is neces-
sary to adhere to the principle of relativity: thing category in compared to...
Formulations of THE LAW OF VALUE in the ideal gas law.

Comparison of the law of value and the ideal gas law

for the value market
The ideal gas law THE LAW OF VALUE

The value market

ܸ஼
ߠൌ‫݌‬ THE LAW OF VALUE . In the isobaric process, the theoretical price of a unit
ܰ݇ of consumer mass of commodities is directly proportional to the labour value of a
unit of consumer mass of commodities. The proportionality coefficient is a
ܸ஼ fundamental constant‫݌‬.
ߠൌ‫݌‬
‫ܿܯ‬௏

The law of value. In the isobaric process, the money value (price) of a unit of consumer mass is di-
rectly proportional to its labour value

The law of value. THE VALUE OF WHAT? The value of the thing.

Lemma:

ܸ஼ valuecategorycomparedto … labourvalue
ൌ ൌ 
‫ܿܯ‬ thingcategorycomparedto consumermassሺthingሻ
ተ ௏
ܸ஼
ൌ thevalueofaunitofaunitofthingcategory!
‫ܿܯ‬௏
ተ ܸ
஼
ൌ thelabourvalueofaunitofCONSUMERMASSሺthingሻ
‫ܿܯ‬௏

The mistake of thing fetishists

ఋொ
The commodity mass ‫ ܯ‬and the consumer mass ‫ ܥ‬ൌ  are not the same thing. The commodity
ௗఏ
mass is measured in tons of wheat, meters of fabric. But it is possible to measure the commodity
mass and the number of molecules – ܰ.So the commodity mass is the number of molecules.
The commodity mass is the consumer mass multiplied by the heat capacity of the market. It is equal
ఋொ
to ‫˔ܯ‬௏ or ‫ ܥ‬ൌ  in transition process. Thus, the consumer mass is the total heat capacity of the
ௗఏ
 63
63

gas. The total heat capacity of a gas in transition process is a variable value. It can change when the
commodity mass remains a constant value.

What is sold on the market?

Thing fetishist Anti-fetishist
Hegel: “This is an appearance”. In fact, the CONSUMER MASS
The market sells COMMODITY
is sold on the market – ‫ܿܯ‬௏ . It depends on the heat capacity of
MASS – M tons of wheat or me-
the market. In transition process, the total heat capacity is sold on
ters of fabric
the market‫ܥ‬.
What does the buyer pay for?
The buyer pays for the commodi- Hegel: “This is an appearance”. In fact, the buyer pays for the
ties: for tons of wheat, for meters CONSUMER MASS ʠሺ‫˔ܯ‬௏ ሻ, not for the commodity mass. In
of fabric, for the commodity transition process, the buyer pays for the thermal mass – the total
ఋொ
mass‫ܯ‬. heat capacity ‫ ܥ‬ൌ .
ௗఏ
The ideal gas law in the law of value:
ܸ஼
‫݊݋݅ݏݎ݁ݒݐݏݎ݅ܨ‬ ߠൌ‫݌‬ 
ተ ܰ݇
ܸ஼
ܵ݁ܿ‫݊݋݅ݏݎ݁ݒ݀݊݋‬ ߠൌ‫݌‬
‫ܿܯ‬௏

The equation shows that the payment is not for a unit of commodity mass‫ܯ‬, but for a unit of con-
sumer mass ‫ܿܯ‬௏ .
Lemma. In the isobaric process, the money value (price) is not the value of a unit of commodity,
not a unit of COMMODITY MASS M, but the value of a unit of CONSUMER MASS ‫ܥ‬.
THE LAW OF VALUE
Theorem. In the isobaric process, the money value (price) of a unit of consumer mass is directly
proportional to its labour value.
Entropy is the value of heat capacity.

How to measure USE VALUE?

The use value of the consumer mass is the entropy S. It is impossible to measure it, but it can be
calculated for any transition process.
Hegel pointed out that use value can be measured. And as always the leader of the dialectics was
right.
The theory of the two comings of the market
The theory of the two comings of the market can help to solve some logical problems.

The first coming of the market.

The first coming of the market means the birth of an equilibrium market. There have been multiple
sales, purchases, and manufacturing of commodities. So, the market has stabilized and become
equilibrium. So, the market was born. It means that all the categories PRICE, VALUE, USE VAL-
UE, MONEY have already been born.
The second coming of the market.
A new transition period has begun. And our task is to predict the behavior of the market in the tran-
sition process.
64 64

The transition process is a disaster. The old market is dying. It means that all the old categories are
dying: PRICE, MONEY, VALUE. After the disaster, a new market is born, and new categories are
born: PRICE, MONEY, VALUE. It means that new MONEY is not the old MONEY. But accord-
ing to the law of NEGATION OF THE NEGATION, some features of the old money are still the
same in the new money.
The main theorem of Marx’s Capital is the theory of transition process. Marx’s Capital is the theory
of the second coming of the market.

The principle of determinism. Authors’ formulation

Theorems and axioms of determinism are as follows:

1) There is only one DUAL ESSENCE and many SEMI-DUAL ESSENCES for any PHE-
NOMENON.
2) THE DUAL ESSENCE both corresponds to the PHENOMENON and exhausts the
PHENOMENON.
3) SEMI-DUAL ESSENCES either correspond, but do not exhaust, or exhaust, but do not
correspond (contradict).

Here we consider the categories PHENOMENON and ESSENCE to be dialectical.

What did the authors introduce into the principle of determinism? The authors introduced the con-
cept of “semi-dual categories”. It is impossible to justify the principle of determinism without these
semi-dual categories. Semi-dual categories logically introduce elements of chance into Hegel’s
“Science of Logic”.

Here we study the society of small-scale producers, a society that has never existed. We consider
the global market to be a THERMOSTAT. It is assumed to be in an equilibrium state. Supply and
demand on a global scale equalize each other. As it should be in thermodynamics, we do not study
the world market. We select a small part of the global market and study it.

So, we are considering a separate local market within the global market. World market (thermostat)
this is a huge ocean. We assume that it is in equilibrium state. This ocean has some waves (fluctua-
tions). Since the ocean is huge, large waves are likely to appear. Such waves for the market are a
crisis and a disaster.

The political economic meaning of the fundamental constant of human value

The fundamental constant of value for the ideal world market of small-scale producers is equal to
one:
ܷ ‫ܥ‬ ܸ݈ܽ‫݁ݑ‬
‫݌‬ൌ ൌ 1൤ ൨ ൌ 1൤ ൨.
ܸ ‫݄ܮ‬ ݈ܾܽ‫ݎݑ݋݄ݎݑ݋‬
The introduction of the fundamental value constant is a discovery. Indeed, we have discovered that
the pressure of the world market is equal to ONE. This discovery is comparable to the discovery of
atmospheric pressure on the planet. The fundamental constant of value expresses the great idea of
the EQUALITY of people as values. Two groups of producers are equal to each other if their fun-
damental value constants are equal.
Closure of the dialectical spiral. Return to Pythagoras
Theorem. The greatest FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANT of humankind is the VALUE CON-
STANT:
 65
65

‫ܥ‬ ܸ݈ܽ‫݁ݑ‬
‫ ݌‬ൌ 1൤ ൨ ൌ 1൤ ൨
‫݄ݐ‬ ‫ݎݑ݋݄ݎݑ݋ܾܽܮ‬
There are many great fundamental constants in physics, but the greatest of them is the UNIT
(‫ ݌‬ൌ 1ሻ.Pythagoras would have been delighted.

Axioms of the distribution of political economic time (value)

The distribution of VALUES must be set AXIOMATICALLY. As you remember the example with
shoemakers, we calculated the distribution of values by labour hours, but the distribution should be
set by an axiom in the general model.
The value distribution curve is the most important curve in political economy. Finding the shape of
this curve is the main task of the axiomatization of Marx’s political economy. We did not find it.
An important question: Do political economy and physics completely coincide or not? The mean-
ing of the question is as follows. A molecule can have a small speed and a small energy, 20% of the
average energy. But a person cannot systematically sell his commodities at 20% of the average
price. He is not a molecule, he can starve to death.
The mathematical meaning of the question is as follows: In political economy, are the distribution
functions TRUNCATED OR NOT? If we believe that small-scale producers can starve to death if
they sell less 20% of the real price, then the distribution function will be truncated. So the question
is still: “TRUNCATED OR NOT?”
This question is equivalent to the question: “Are the random variables of political economy CON-
STRAINED OR NOT?”. Is it forbidden for the random variables of political economy to take any
impossible values?
THE QUESTION OF THE NORMAL LAW
The normal law is a general philosophical law. The general philosophical form of this theorem is as
follows:
The central limit theorem or the normal law theorem
Theorem. The normalized sum of a large number of independent commensurate random variables is
always a normal random variable.
And we managed without it. Maxwell deduces everything from the normal law. It must work like
this. But we were not able to repeat Maxwell’s scheme.
Question. Can the VALUE of a unit of LABOUR VALUE be a normal random variable?
It cannot. The value is positive, and no approximations are allowed in strict axiomatic systems.
One of the possible ways to make Maxwell’s scheme
If all small-scale producers work with the same productivity, then there is no competition and there
is no market either! After all, the market is a competition and an accident. Therefore, the speed of a
person’s work should be understood as the degree of his superiority over other small-scale produc-
ers.

If a worker sells his labour hours, dividing them into equal shares of ȟܸ, but each element of the
commodity contains a different number of values, then there will be such commodities on the mar-
ket:
ȟ‫ܥ‬ଵ ȟ‫ܥ‬ଶ ȟ‫ܥ‬ଷ ȟ‫ܥ‬ସ ȟ‫ܥ‬௡
, , , ,…,
ȟܸ ȟܸ ȟܸ ȟܸ ȟܸ
66 66

Perhaps, it is necessary to define axiomatically the distribution of the following values:

ȟ‫ܥ‬ଵ ȟ‫ܥ‬ଶ ȟ‫ܥ‬ଷ ȟ‫ܥ‬ସ ȟ‫ܥ‬ହ ȟ‫଺ܥ‬ ȟ‫ ଻ܥ‬ȟ‫଼ܥ‬

ȟܸ െ ȟܸ , ȟܸ െ ȟܸ , ȟܸ െ ȟܸ , … , ȟܸ െ ȟܸ ?
ȟܸ ȟܸ ȟܸ ȟܸ

These values can also be negative. It means that a normal law is possible.

 67
67

Chapter V. The money market and golden FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANT of value

§ 5.1. The small-scale money market with two degrees of freedom

In the money market model, the role of abstract value is played by gold (not by abstract time). But it
does not play very well.
Criticism of GOLD-THING. If treasure is found, then prices will rise in an isolated market, but the
total value will not change. So gold-thing is not a value. We have to consider the dialectical pair:

Definition. The value is this dialectical pair in a philosophical sense. The transitions GOLD-THING
lGOLD-RELATION determine the laws of the money market functioning.
The answer to the criticism of GOLD-THINGS. When the scale of prices changes, the gold-thing
ceases to measure value in a linear way in the transition process. This is true.
But according to statistics: we can calculate the real change in the abstract value by the quantity of
money and commodities. We can assume that gold is a golden thermometer with a nonlinear scale.
And with this nonlinear scale, we can accurately calculate all the characteristics of the market. So
that is all right: gold plus a mathematical model accurately measures all values.
But there is still a question. Therefore, consider the following categories of the money market:
V volumeoflabour
อ U timeasanabstractvalue
Z goldasavalue
Is it possible to create a model in which the value is abstract time (not gold)?
Is it possible to create a model to include all three categories:ܸ, ܷ, ܼ?
Version 1. It is impossible.
Version 2. It is possible. It is necessary to introduce gold producers in gold mines and organize the
exchange of gold for food and other commodities.
Version 3. Producer classes, as well as the exchange between them, are needed.

§ 5.2. Determination of the fundamental constant of value of the money market

There is the first coming of the market. All categories have already been born. The market is in
equilibrium.
Definition of the category ܼ. ܼ is the sum of the prices of all commodities sold on the market for a
fixed period. Prices are always expressed in grams of gold.
ܸ஼ is the volume of labour spent on the production of the entire commodity mass.
Definition. The golden fundamental constant of value is called the value:
௓
‫݌‬ൌ .
௏಴
68 68

Results of building a money market model

We got the ideal gas law:

ܼ ൌ ‫ܸ݌‬஼ ൌ ܰ݇ߠ
We took gold for internal political economic energy. The analogy is not obvious. Justification. Un-
der capitalism, the source of movement and energy of people is gold, money. According to Hegel’s
idealism, under communism, the energy of people will be the IDEA.

§ 5.3. Political economic sense of the golden FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANT of value

୥୰ୟ୫୭୤୥୭୪ୢ
For example, ‫ ݌‬ൌ 0.5 . This constant is the answer to the American’s question: “How
୪ୟୠ୭୳୰୦୭୳୰
much are you worth?”. Ivanov costs one hundred grams of gold, and Petrov costs a ton of gold.
There are no people, people have not yet been born. There are only pieces of gold on the streets.
The philosophical interpretation of the inverse constant is much better:
1 labourhour
ൌ2
‫݌‬ gramofgold
Here we can assume that two human lives are buried alive in one piece of gold. Only one of these
two versions can be correct, but it is not known which one. Marx’s theory of fetishism is terrible
thing, as you never know if you are standing right or upside down.
Service for calculating the gold fundamental constant of value

1) THE GOLD FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANT OF VALUEሺ‫݌‬ሻ of the world market on the planet
is an analog of the atmospheric pressure on the planet.
2) It is necessary to calculate the gold fundamental constant of value with accuracy, both in the
world market and in private markets.
3) Physicists have a service for calculating fundamental constants, the same service should exist for
political economists. The law of the unity of the world!
4) The semi-universal constants of value of partial markets, when they function, generate one UNI-
VERSAL GOLD FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANT OF VALUE of the world market.
5) The universal gold fundamental constant of value (pressure p) of the world market is the regula-
tor of all economic processes on the planet.

§ 5.4. Two ways to calculate the gold FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANT OF VALUE: via people
and via commodities

The first way to calculate the total labour time via people
Version 1. There are the ideal political economic gas and the idealized market of small-scale pro-
ducers. If we have N small-scale producers, and all of them work the same way for ten hours a day
and two hundred and fifty days a year, then, the total physical time is
ܸ ൌ ܰ ‫ כ‬10 ‫ כ‬250 labour hours.

Version 2. There are the ideal political economic gas and ܰ small-scale producers. But all of them
work at different physical times in a year: ܸଵ , ܸଶ , ܸଷ , … , ܸெିଵ , ܸெ . The quantity of labour or total la-
bour time is equal to: ܸ஼ ൌ ܸଵ ൅ ܸଶ ൅ ܸଷ ൅ ‫ ڮ‬൅ ܸெିଵ ൅ ܸெ .
 69
69

Version 3. There is modern monopolistic market. We take into account only labour hours, not para-
sites. We take only the labour part of the semi-parasites’ labour time in the variable V.
Example. The head of the department, when he works as a teacher, is a worker. We take into ac-
count the teaching time, since his work as the head of the department is parasitic. This time is not
taken into account, since it does not create value.
Example. The airport dispatcher and the power grid dispatcher are workers and their labour hours
are taken into account. The Energy Minister is a parasite. Accountants and cashiers are parasites.
Their parasitic time does not create value.
Example. Sellers are money parasites, but if the seller is forced to carry the commodities, to lay
them out, then this part of the time will be counted. It is not easy to count the labour time of semi-
parasites.
The second method of calculating the total labour time for commodities is as follows:
We observe COMMODITIES, not people. The second method IS TIMING required for the produc-
tion of commodities. There is timing in all monopolies. If we have N commodities, and labour time
ܸଵ , ܸଶ , ܸଷ , … , ܸேିଵ , ܸே , spent on each commodity, then the total labour time is equal to:
ܸ஼ ൌ ܸଵ ൅ ܸଶ ൅ ܸଷ ൅ ‫ ڮ‬൅ ܸேିଵ ൅ ܸே .
The results of two different methods of calculating the total quantity of labour should coincide, be-
cause political economy is an exact science.

HOW IS THE GOLD FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANT OF VALUE BORN?

So, the total labour time was born. Then the gold fundamental constant of value is born. It is the
pressure of the market:

ܼ gramofgold ܼ ݃݃
‫ ݌‬ൌ ൤ ൨ ൌ ቂ ቃ.
ܸ஼ labourhour ܸ஼ ‫݄ܮ‬

§ 5.5. The theory of duality between people and commodities in a two-dimensional space of
categories

Marx’s political economic law in the ideal gas equation contains a duality between PEOPLE and
COMMODITIES.

THE DUALITY of the political economic ideal gas equation

ܼ ൌ ‫ܸ݌‬஼ ൌ ܰ݇ߠ
‫ܸ݌‬஼ ܰ݇ߠ
people commodities
This is the total political economic ener-
This is the total political economic energy of peo-
gy of commodities. This is the sum of
ple
the prices of all commodities in gold.
‫ܸ݌‬஼ ൌ ‫ܸ݌‬ଵ ൅ ‫ܸ݌‬ଶ ൅ ‫ ڮ‬൅ ‫ܸ݌‬ெିଵ ൅ ‫ܸ݌‬ெ ݇ߠଵ ൅ ݇ߠଶ ൅ ‫ ڮ‬൅ ݇ߠேିଵ ൅ ݇ߠே
"ܰ" is the quantity OF COMMODI-
"‫ "ܯ‬is the quantity OF PEOPLE!
TIES!
SUPPLY in people DEMAND
70 70

Unambiguous definition of values of the categories DEMAND and SUPPLY
The quantity of labourܸ஼ is the total supply in
The value ܰ݇ is the market demand in
LABOUR VALUES. Workers put up for sale
the CONSUMER MASSES.
their labour times in the form of labour values.
The value‫ܸ݌‬஼ is the total SUPPLY in abstract The valueܰ݇ߠ is the total demand in
VALUES abstract values.
There is always a duality between people and commodities!

Lemma. It is impossible to give an absolute and unambiguous definition of the law of SUPPLY and
the law of DEMAND within the ideal gas model.
The reversible transition process can be interpreted twice: both as a manifestation of the law of
SUPPLY and as a manifestation of the law of DEMAND. The answer depends on the direction of
the process.

The Mendeleev-ɋlapeyron ideal gas law

The law of equality of SUPPLY AND
The law of VALUE
DEMAND
ܸ஼ ‫ܸ݌‬஼ ൌ ܰ݇ߠ
ߠൌ‫݌‬
ܰ݇ ‫ܸ݌‬஼ ൌ ‫ܿܯ‬௏ ߠ
ܰ݇ is the consumer mass. This is a thing category, not a value category

THE LAW OF VALUE. In the isobaric process, the

THE LAW OF EQUALITY OF DE-
price (money value) of a unit of consumer mass is
MAND AND SUPPLY is an analogue of
proportional to its labour value. The proportionality
the law of conservation of energy.
coefficient is the fundamental constant ‫݌‬

The simplest version of the law of DEMAND and the law of SUPPLY separately
THE LAW OF SUPPLY THE LAW OF DEMAND
‫ܸ݌‬஼
ܰ݇ ൌ
ܰ݇ߠ ߠ
ܸൌ
‫݌‬ ‫ܸ݌‬஼
‫˔ܯ‬௏ ൌ
ߠ
THE SUPPLY of labour values to the market will The DEMAND for the consumer mass
ே௞ఏ ௣௏
be fixed if the parameters mutually cancel each will be fixed if the parameters ಴ mutu-
௣ ఏ
other out ally cancel each other out
These theorems are not correct, but they can be made correct. Why? Because:
1) theorems outside of processes are prohibited;
2) the words supply and demand depend on the direction of the processes.
Note. The market does not sell commodities and mass‫ܯ‬ሺܰሻ. The consumer mass is sold on
the market. These are the values‫˔ܯ‬௏ or ܰ݇ in the equilibrium state.
Consumer mass in transition processes is the total heat capacity:
ఋொ ఋொ
‫ ܥ‬ൌ . Thus, in transition processes, the market sells the consumer mass ‫ ܥ‬ൌ , not the
ௗఏ ௗఏ
commodity mass‫ܯ‬ሺܰሻ.
 71
71

Lemma. In the isobaric process:
a) The market priceߠ is not the price of the one commodity, because consumer masses (not
values or commodities) are sold on the market.
௣௏
b) The market priceߠ is the value of a unit of consumer mass (not value). since: ߠ ൌ ಴
ே௞

These theorems are only methodological in nature. Only the formulas of transition processes have a
calculated sense.
Lemma. Theorems of political economy are prohibited outside of processes. These theorems do not
exist outside of processes.
In the eight-dimensional space of categories ȳ଼ we will have four laws of supply and four laws of
demand for each process!

§ 5.6. Comparison of the categories of biology and political economy

Brief summary of the Third Book “The Political World of Marx”

Biology Political economy of Marx

Biology In biology Political economy In political economy
Man has He is living. He cannot work. He is
He is armless. He has no political
hands. called “the armless
economic hands.
man”.
The armless
She has no But she HAS hands in She is handy one. She drives bet-
girl drives cars
hands. political economy. ter than many healthy people.
with her feet.
Man has hear- He cannot sing. He is He is deaf. He has no political
He is not deaf.
ing. called “the deaf man”. economic ears.
Money is “dead” A man is dead. Marx said: “When
Money is a LIVING
Man is living. paper. we kill MONEY, we WILL RE-
THING.
VIVE OURSELVES”.
When we kill GREED, the LIV-
ING soul of the COMMODITY,
Commodity Dead Living then we will revive ourselves.
Under communism, commodities
will be DEAD.

Lemma. If a person does not know how to work, then he is armless in the political economy of Karl
Marx. He has no political economy hands.
Question. Is this lemma an exact theorem of political economy or a figurative literary analogy?
Answer. Political economy is an exact science. Everything is political economic in political econo-
my. There are no biological categories in political economy. Marx does not study biological nation-
ality. Marx is not a biologist.
72 72

Biology Political economy
Nationality by education. You love the his-
Political economic na-
tory of Russia and Germany. You are fluent
Biological nationali- tionality.
in Russian and German. You have three po-
ty. You are English. Variable (dialectical) na-
litical economic nationalities. You are a rich
tionality.
man according to the theory of communism.
A political economic You are a teacher. You love your students.
family. But you also love your children. You have a
Biological family
Dialectical, variable fam- large dialectical political economic family.
ily. Some students leave, new students come.
The Ivanov family
This biological family is not a political economic family.
is not a friendly one.
But they are not bio-
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels are political economic brothers.
logical brothers.
Hegel, Marx, En- But they are living in po- The theory of communism of the leaders
gels, Lenin are dead litical economy will save the rotting planet of people.
The working people come to life only dur-
ing revolutions. They perform miracles.
The proletarian is The proletarian is dead in
When the revolution is ending, the worker
living in biology political economy
becomes dead again. We are dead in politi-
cal economic.
Money destroys oceans with garbage. If we
kill GREED – MONEY (not people), we
Money is dead Money is a predatory will revive ourselves.
paper creature The black soul of money (greed) will be
killed and the money will become dead pa-
per.
If we kill the greedy soul of the commodi-
The commodity is The commodity is a pred-
ties, we will revive ourselves. Under com-
dead atory living creature
munism, commodities will be dead.

§ 5.7. Lenin’s theory of the duality of socialism. Socialism is a semi-communist and semi-
bourgeois system
Lenin’s theory of the duality of socialism. Socialism is a dual semi-communist and semi-bourgeois
system.
Lenin. Consequence. All categories of the political economy of socialism are dual, composite.

Political economy of
capitalism socialism communism
living half-dead dead
Dead money (tickets, re-
Living money Money-Signs (Lenin)
ceipts)
Living commodity Product– commodity (Lenin) Product (dead commodity)
Dead proletarian A half-dead man Living, powerful man
Proletarian (Hired Proletarian –Worker. Worker. Free man
 73
73

worker) Half hired worker – half free man

There is a complete table of Lenin’s categories of socialism and communism in the books of the
authors. Lenin proved this theorem twice: the first time he did it with the help of the Hegelian
PRINCIPLE OF DEVELOPMENT, and the second time with the help of Marx’s great theory “ON
UNEQUAL COMMUNIST LAW”.

§ 5.8. How do COMMODITIES AND MONEY COME to LIFE in the political economy?
Money and commodities are LIVING predatory creatures.

Definition. A commodity is a product of labour that can MOVE without social control. How did
Lenin prove that PRODUCT-COMMODITIES are a category of the political economy of social-
ism?
There was a planned economy in the USSR. Under socialism, market trade was considered specula-
tion and was severely punished. The products of labour were not allowed to MOVE, so, it is NOT A
COMMODITY . But there was MONEY in the form of PAYMENT FOR LABOUR, which means
COMMODITIES.
Therefore, the category Product -Commodity or semi-product-semi-commodity is a category of the
political economy of socialism. The money of socialism was also half-dead.
But commodities and money are predatory immortal creatures. Five thousand years ago, these crea-
tures were born, and they are going to live forever. They are immortal creatures, because they can
come to life.
Under socialism, the evolution of money was not killed. But the evolution of money is the evolution
of GREED. Socialist money has always dreamed of turning into a great predator CAPITAL.
How did the half-dead MONEY and half-dead COMMODITIES of socialism come to life?
MONEY came to life during the evolution of greed. It has decomposed the state apparatus: the po-
lice, the ministries. MONEY instilled GREED in the souls of the socialist elite and turned it into the
bourgeoisie.
It is impossible to stop speculation with political measures in the long term. The elites of entire re-
publics began to engage in speculation. The elite transferred state products to private hands, and it
was sold as personal products of peasants, because it was allowed to sell personal products grown
on their small household plots.
Result. The products of socialism CAME to LIFE and began to MOVE outside of social control.
They have turned into predatory creatures, into COMMODITY.
Axiom of Marxism. MONEY and COMMODITIES cannot be controlled for a long time.
They are immortal predatory creatures. Sooner or later, they will begin to control their supervisors
and the police, and the entire state.
Marx’s theorem. Living MONEY and living COMMODITIES must be KILLED, as living
creatures (not people). We need to get rid of their GREEDY black souls, and then money will be-
come just papers, and commodities will become just products.
Why did the product of labour become a commodity, a living, predatory creature?
How do things come to life in the political economy of capitalism and communism?
Examples of the living things and process of its reviving in the theory of communism:
74 74

Example 1. A grandmother taught her granddaughter to play the piano. They lived happily to-
gether. But within the time grandmother died. The granddaughter often played the piano, remem-
bering happy days. The girl’s father bought a new piano. He thought that the girl would be delight-
ed to have the new piano. But for the girl, the disappearance of the old piano was a disaster, and she
refused to play. After all, the old piano was LIVING for her, because her grandmother’s soul lived
in it. And the new piano was a beautiful, but dead instrument.
Grandmother revived the piano. She put her love and her soul into the piano. Old lady was
gone. But her living piano still brings her granddaughter to life.
Example 2. This example is well known to all parents who have more than one kid.
There are two sisters. The elder sister is ten years old, the little one is five. The elder girl is
like mother to another one. Just imagine: she gave a drawing book to little sister, and started doing
her homework. Then she left room for a while. The little girl took her sister’s notebook and began
to draw there. The notebook with the homework is ruined. The children quarreled and both cried.
Question. Why did little girl want to draw in her sister’s notebook (instead of drawing in her
book)?
Answer. It is all about emotions. The elder sister did her tasks with great emotional strain. She
revived her notebook with these emotions. Her notebook has become a LIVING NOTEBOOK for
the baby. A living notebook attracts the little girl.
Examples of the living things and process of its reviving in the political economy of capital-
ism and socialism:
SELL OUT the Motherland and BETRAY the Motherland are the same thing in the Russian lan-
guage. The proletarian of capitalism is a hired worker. He is the owner of private property. The pro-
letarian believes that his hands are his private property. Therefore, the proletarian has not only the
proletarian ideology, but also the bourgeois ideology of the hired worker. But with the help of the
theory of communism, the workers are able to discard the ideology of the hired worker.
The worker of socialism was also a semi-hired worker and semi-free. He worked for a SALARY.
He wanted to make more money. Salary develops GREED. He put GREED into the labour thing.
And his labour thing began to COME to LIFE. During perestroika (political movement for refor-
mation), the labour thing CAME to LIFE forever and turned into a predatory creature, into a LIV-
ING COMMODITY, into a living MONEY.
The evolution of money and greed began. And in the course of this terrible evolution, real money
merged into SHARKS.
What is the difference between the living labour things of communism and capitalism?
1) Love is embedded in the living things of communism.
2) Malice and greed are embedded in the living things of capitalism.

But there is an important logical difference.

The things of capitalism are METAPHYSICAL. They are ETERNAL. They are living forever.
They rule over people like cruel eternal gods. They cannot die on their own, they should be killed
(not people).
The things of communism are DIALECTIC.
The principle of dialectics. There is nothing eternal. EVERYTHING THAT WAS BORN WILL
DIE.
Under communism:
 75
75

1ሻ‫ݏ݁ݐܽ݊݅݉݋݄݀݃݊݅ݐ݃݊݅ݒ݈݄݅݁ݐ‬ሺ݂݈݅݊‫ݏ݁ܿ݊݁ݑ‬ሻ‫;݊݋ݏݎ݁݌݄݁ݐ‬
2ሻ‫ݏ݁ݐܽ݊݅݉݋݀݊݋ݏݎ݁݌݄݁ݐ‬ሺ݂݈݅݊‫ݏ݁ܿ݊݁ݑ‬ሻ‫;݄݃݊݅ݐ݄݁ݐ‬
൦
3ሻ‫ݎ݁ݒ݁ݎ݋݂݄݃݊݅ݐܽ݁ݒ݅ݒ݁ݎ݋ݐ݈ܾ݁݅ݏݏ݋݌݉݅ݏ݅ݐܫ‬.
4ሻ‫݁݉݅ݐ݋ݐ݁݉݅ݐ݉݋ݎ݂݄݃݊݅ݐܽ݁ݒ݅ݒ݁ݎ݋ݐݕݎܽݏݏ݁ܿ݁݊ݏ݅ݐܫ‬.

The program of communism (not socialism) from Marx

NATIONALIZATION OF HUMAN BEING in the political economic sense
Under communism, the hands of the worker, the brains of scientists, the voices of singers, the ears
(hearing) of musicians, and the feet of dancers will be nationalized. Children will be nationalized
(in the political economic sense, not in the biological sense).
How? There is an example of UNCONDITIONAL INCOME of Catalonia. All salaries will be de-
stroyed. If all people are given the same unconditional income, for example 2000 euros, then money
and greed will be killed in one day.
Nationalization of children means that children belong to the nation in political economy. And this
means that the nation takes children for full economic support. All children are also entitled to an
unconditional income. The child will receive everything for free: free school food, free computer,
free sports uniform. The child will not be supported by the father and mother, but by the whole
NATION (Great Goddess).
Lenin: “Liberate women from domestic slavery”.

§ 5.9. The duality between people and commodities is a formal, but not a substantive reason
for commodity-money fetishism

The duality theory establishes a kind of equality between people and commodities. This equality is
the formal mathematical reason for the existence of the disease of the thing VALUE fetishism. Ac-
cording to the theory of fetishism, statements about commodities can be interpreted as theorems
about people and vice versa.
Examples.
Advertising of raisins: “Izyum Vasilievich”
(“Izyum” is a raisin in the Russian language; “Vasilyevich” is the second (patronymic) name).
The TV series La Piovra (Octopus, poulpe): “When MONEY sings, the muse is silent”.
“Diamonds are girls’ best friends”.
Discussion. Man had a voice before perestroika. He could sing. He had friends. He had a proud sur-
name, inherited from his heroic grandfather. Now the working man is NOBODY. His voice went to
the MONEY. Now money is able to sing, and the worker is sullenly silent. Even his last name was
taken away from him. His surname and patronymic name passed to RAISINS. Izyum Vasilyevich
subdued all Russians. Here comes Mr. IZYUM VASILYEVICH, bow to our benefactor. He gives
us a job. Do not leave us, our benefactor.
Karl Marx’s theory of the thing VALUE fetishism. Fetishism No. 1.
Earlier, money was just pieces of paper serving people, but now the money took the GREEDY
SOULS of people and came to life. It took away a beautiful wife and children from a working man.
Money drove a man out of his house and began to live in this house with his wife and his sons. The
money took away man’s first and last name. It took away a man’s divine smile and beautiful voice.
76 76

It hired political economic hairdressers. And living MONEY became like people when people were
still people.
This theory, according to which COMMODITIES AND MONEY CAME TO LIFE and turned into
PEOPLE, and people turned into lifeless creatures, is called Karl Marx’s theory of THING VALUE
FETISHISM. This theory is true. It is hard not to believe when IZYUM VASILYEVICH proudly
walks across Russia. He performs on television every day. Our great artists sing songs to him.
Another advertisement. Russians like sunflower seeds. “LISA SEMECHKINA” is written on the
sunflower seeds product. “SEMECHKA” is a seed in the Russian language.
The world of Russian women is fantastic: Elena the Wise, Blue-eyes-Wonder-woman, Alyonushka,
Liza the Golden-haired, Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya. And now Lisa the Golden-haired has become a
sunflower seed. We see that the commodity IZYUM has turned into a powerful person, and the
beautiful Lisa has turned into a seed.
Question. Is it a figurative expression or reality?
Political economy is an amazing science. In political economy, the dead Marx turns out to be a liv-
ing person. AND THE ZEUS OF THE REVOLUTION WILL BE BACK WITH THE SECOND
COMING. And the Russian people, which seem to be living, today are the dead people. Two dozen
people subjugated everyone.
Example. The time when Soviet people were living. Wikipedia.
Evacuation in the Soviet Union was the mass migration of western Soviet citizens and its industries
eastward as a result of Operation Barbarossa, the German military invasion of June 1941. The evac-
uation made it possible to preserve the main economic base and industrial potential of the country
and became one of the factors that ensured victory in the war.

In terms of its scale and effectiveness, it has no analogues in world history: during the first 4
months of the war, 8 million people, 2.5 thousand industrial enterprises, 1.5 thousand collective
farms (kolkhoz) and state-owned (sovkhoz) farms were withdrawn from the German attacks.
Discussion. It is impossible to understand how the Soviet people could have done such a thing.
Now the Russians are political economic dead.
The bourgeois is a person in biology, but he is DEAD in political economy. Only LIVING MONEY
put him in motion. The source of movement and life of the bourgeois is only MONEY. It means
that from the point of view of ESSENCE, the bourgeois is a DEAD. He is not a human in the high-
est and divine sense of the word “human” (“who has laid down his life for their friends, and en-
dured everything to the end” by Tyutchev). The bourgeois is only a SHELL for LIVING MONEY.
The bourgeois looks like a normal living person, but it is an illusion. Mimicry also exists in political
economy. Do not believe your eyes. You can look and see something living person in a beautiful
suit, but, no, it is the illusion. This is a LIVING omnipotent MONEY, and it is laughing at the pa-
thetic little people.
LIVING MONEY learned to speak the human language, put on a tailcoat. Image makers are the po-
litical economic hairdressers, who help the money to put on human form.
The octopus crawled out of the dead shell and ran away. The same thing happens with the bour-
geois. In this example, the bourgeois is a shell, and the money is an octopus, when the bour-
geois/shell is dead, the money/octopus is looking for a new living shelter.
This beautiful theory is called Karl Marx’s THEORY OF ALIENATION. According to this theory,
MONEY ALIENATED from a person his beautiful smile, divine voice, name, and came to life
themselves. And the man ceased to be a man. Now he is a LABOUR-POWER, a freak with no eyes
or ears, no voice, no name.
 77
77

There is the great mystery of humanity.
Some grand-looking men with gold chains, expensive watches and very expensive ladies walk
along the avenue. You can see that people are walking, but you should not believe your eyes. In
fact, they are LIVING MONEY, disguised as people. They just have good political economic hair-
dressers, image makers.
But Marx will return with the second coming, and will reveal his secret to humanity. Then everyone
will exclaim: “Men! These are not people! This is MONEY. WE ARE PEOPLE”. And people will
regain their voices, ears, eyes, names. And they will start to sing and dance. People will get their
beautiful wives back. They will take back their homes. And people will live as a world Commune.
But the theory of fetishism should be stated briefly. All theorists are obliged to simplify the formu-
lations TO AN ATOM. This simple and intelligible knowledge will be fundamental knowledge. It
is also important to give such a formulation artistic expressiveness. The law of the unity of the
world is Lenin’s favorite law.
The theory of the thing VALUE fetishism. Fetishism No. 1
The theorem of thing value fetishism. Capitalism.
1) Dead MONEY took away the FEELINGS of (greedy) people and CAME to LIFE in the po-
litical economy.
2) People, from whom MONEY took away all feelings, DIED in the political economy.

Comparing the two sciences Biology Political Economy

Proletarian living Political economic dead
His product (COMMODITY) dead LIVING political economic creature
MONEY dead LIVING political economic creatures

The phenomenon of thing fetishism exists objectively. The reality is that money came to life, and
people died in political economy. It turns out that the theory of fetishism is a true theory, since it
reflects reality. What should we do?
Yes, the MONEY came to life, but only because they fed on the GREED of PEOPLE. Half of the
world’s gold is in America. And if you mold a golden IDOL out of it, then the idol will come to
life. This is living huge IDOL rules the planet, and not the American oligarchs.
The difference between Marx and the bourgeois theorist is as follows. The bourgeois fetishist theo-
rist sees his Golden God and faithfully serves him. And Marx sees living people buried alive inside
this golden idol.
And the leader shouts to the people buried alive: “People! You are not dead yet. I can hear your
hearts. Drink the LIVING WATER OF COMMUNISM (not socialism) and your power will return
to you. And the dark Gods will be defeated”. When LIVING MONEY (not people or the bourgeoi-
sie) dies, and when people move to a non-monetary economy, then PEOPLE WILL COME TO
LIFE.
Lenin’s theorem: “THE WAGE IS BOURGEOISE. The labour penny is bourgeois. It must be
killed by a TOTAL EQUALITY of the LEADERS and the WORKERS!”
Lenin: THE EVOLUTION OF MONEY needs to BE KILLED. We need to kill evolution!
The proof of the theorem is contained in Lenin’s book “THE STATE AND REVOLUTION”. Lenin
proves everything from the theorems of Hegel and Marx. This book also contains criticism of the
socialist state. The book is directed against the socialist state. The book is the bible of communism,
not socialism.
78 78

The name “THE STATE AND REVOLUTION” means that a communist revolution, will also
ABOLISH the socialist state. And it will establish the Commune as a GLOBAL COMMUNITY.
Author’s proof of Lenin’s theorem. The evolution of money begins with the LABOUR PENNY,
with the wages of a working man. But the evolution of MONEY is the evolution of GREED.
The labour penny is small, but it has the terrible power of her mother, the MONSTER CAPITAL. If
the LABOUR PENNY is living, evolution will certainly give rise to SHARKS, to oligarchs.
The USSR did not kill the LABOUR PENNY, and therefore it died. The labour penny is a cage of
CAPITAL. The evolution of money has started in the USSR, and then the greed began to evolve.
The half-dead socialist MONEY came to life and crushed the Russians. The evolution of money and
greed cannot be stopped. It goes every day and every hour. The one and only we are able to do is
“TO KILL A LABOUR PENNY”. And then the money biosphere and the CAPITAL will disap-
pear. We need to kill a penny, and then the CAPITAL (not people) will die.

Lenin’s great PARTMAXIMUM (a limit on the salary of a member of the Communist Party in
the Soviet Union, a maximum wage). A real EQUALIZATION is considered to be an equalization
of Lenin himself and other leaders. The leaders of the future communism must live like workers.
And the common people do not need to be equalized, because the common people have always
been equalized by poverty for all thousands of years of human history.
Why should the WAGE be KILLED by total equalization? We can explain it with the help of the
theory of fetishism.
A worker makes a children’s slide. The slide is the product of labour. But if the worker makes a
slide for MONEY and wants to get more money, and make the slide faster, then the worker puts his
LIVING GREEDY SOUL into the slide, and the slide comes to life. So now this children’s slide is
not a product anymore, it is the COMMODITY.
Definition. COMMODITY is a LIVING PRODUCT. The product is a living and scary creature.
The commodity is able to move outside public control. During perestroika, half-dead socialist
MONEY and COMMODITIES came to life and crushed the Russians.
Results. The worker put his GREEDY HEART into the children’s slide. The worker tried to earn as
much as possible, that is why he made some mistakes. He could redesign the project and make the
slide safe, but he did not it, because he was a slave of the Golden Idol. The slide came to life and
became a predatory commodity, which crushed a child to death. Nowadays predatory commodities,
that can MOVE, destroy entire oceans.
The thing value fetishism and the theory of pure communism, not socialism
The thing value fetishism does not allow people to understand the beautiful and logical theory of
communism by Marx.
The communism program of Marx: “Destruction of money”.
Those people who are sick with thing fetishism under the category of “money” understand
THINGS, the material shell of money. Well, how can we live without money? If we come to the
store and take what we want, it will be the anarchy.
Money is not a thing. Money is a RELATION OF PEOPLE, money is a function. And the destruc-
tion of money is the destruction of the functions of money. Therefore, none of the fetishists suspects
that the communist, non-socialist revolution has already been moving around the planet. There is
POLITICAL ECONOMIC DESTRUCTION OF MONEY around the planet.
Theorem. The introduction of UNCONDITIONAL INCOME in Catalonia and other countries is the
fulfillment of the communist program of Karl Marx.
 79
79

What is the main thing in this program? The main thing is “REAL EQUALITY OF PEOPLE”. Eve-
ryone is paid EQUALLY 500 euros. Why is it important? If one is given 501 euros, and the other
499 euros, then there seems to be no difference. But there is also a very significant difference. If
there is an inequality of even one euro, we will need an official, who will determine to whom to pay
499 euros, to whom 501 euros.
Under equal conditions an official is not needed. And with total equality, when all people will have
the same wages, the STATE BECOMES UNNECESSARY. And the STATE can be ABOLISHED.
Marx said: “The state is a PARASITE”.
So, with unconditional income in Catalonia, money has already lost some of its functions as a
MEASURE OF LABOUR and MEASURE OF WEALTH. Even if they lost only partially, this is
the beginning of the destruction of money, predicted by Marx.

EQUALITY begets BROTHERHOOD (Sparta).

Semi-equality in the USSR also played a positive role. Semi-equality in the USSR gave rise to
semi-brotherhood.
The TOTAL EQUALITY OF communism will give rise to the TOTAL BROTHERHOOD of all
the peoples of the planet. And the great unification of all mankind will definitely take place.

Equality in life, equality in death, equality after death!!

Theorem. According to Marx, the destruction of money is the destruction of the political economic
functions of money, such as a measure of labour, a measure of wealth, a measure of exploitation,
etc.
Money will become Marx’s dead papers after losing its political economic functions. To destroy
money means to KILL MONEY as living political economic predators, to kill their dark soul of
MONEY. And the living things will die, they will become dead papers.
We need to kill LIVING MONEY and the greed (not people). And first of all, we need to kill our
greed and our money. Kill the MONSTER MONEY in YOURSELF. It is Lenin’s partmaximum.
But with total equalization, it will be necessary to introduce a VARIABLE (DIALECTICAL) DI-
VISION OF LABOUR (the Program of Communism from Hegel). All people will get higher educa-
tion. All 100% of the population work both with common labour and sciences.
Marx, Engels, Lenin. EQUALITY IS THE DESTRUCTION OF CLASSES.
The intelligentsia and the working classes will be destroyed as classes by merging into the global
COMMUNE. Communism is a system of WORKERS-SCIENTISTS or SCIENTISTS-WORKERS.

Money must be killed as living beings.

Money is living organisms in Marx’s political economy. Money knows how to give birth: bank in-
terest is newborn child, and banks are money maternity hospitals. We need to destroy the maternity
hospitals of CAPITAL, we need to destroy all the banks. Then money will stop giving birth.
It is necessary to break the legs of money so that money cannot go from account to account. Under
communism, not socialism, the mother cannot transfer money to her son.

Thus, the money will get very sick. Poor and unhappy with broken legs, they will wither and, even-
tually, die. Their corpses are dead pieces of paper. Marx called the corpses of money – labour
vouchers (tickets, receipts, signs). Marx’s labour vouchers are not money in the political economic
sense of the word. They are no different from toilet paper.
80 80

§ 5.10. Contradictions of the golden fundamental constant of value

The formula of the universal value constant is as follows:

ܼ ߠଵ ൅ ߠଶ ൅ ߠଷ ൅ ߠସ ൅ ‫ ڮ‬൅ ൅ߠேିଶ ൅ ߠேିଵ ൅ ߠே
‫݌‬ൌ ൌ
ܸ஼ ܸଵ ൅ ܸଶ ൅ ܸଷ ൅ ܸସ ൅ ‫ ڮ‬൅ ܸெିଶ ൅ ܸெିଵ ൅ ܸெ
Discussion. In the denominator, we add up ten hours of work of a strong worker and ten hours of a
weak or lazy worker in one day and get twenty, because we consider them equal as people. Once
again, this is the most important thing:
10 hours +10 hours = 20 hours,
this is the great communist principle of equality. They are equal as people.
It is psychologically difficult to add 10 hours of the weak worker and 10 hours of the strong one. It
is difficult to come to equality: 10+10=20. It seems that 10 hours of the weak worker +10 hours of
the strong worker ؆ 15 on average 15 hours.

THE COMMUNIST EQUALITY PRINCIPLE

Theorem. The communist principle of equality is expressed in the formula:

ܸ஼ ൌ ܸଵ ൅ ܸଶ ൅ ܸଷ ൅ ܸସ ൅ ‫ ڮ‬൅ ܸெିଶ ൅ ܸெିଵ ൅ ܸெ .
It is surprising that ten hours of a strong worker are taken into account in the same way as ten hours
of a weak worker!

THE CAPITALIST PRINCIPLE OF INEQUALITY IS EXPRESSED IN THE FORMULA:

ܼ ൌ ߠଵ ൅ ߠଶ ൅ ߠଷ ൅ ߠସ ൅ ‫ ڮ‬൅ ൅ߠேିଶ ൅ ߠேିଵ ൅ ߠே

Justification. A strong worker will produce more commodities and therefore, his contribution to the
fundamental constant of value will be greater. So the strong worker will get more values in the mar-
ket than the weak worker. There is wages in the market version.
The Marx-Lenin theorem. Wage is bourgeois. In the USSR, a strong worker, in agreement with a
foreman, selected profitable jobs for himself, and the weak workers could take only heavy, poorly
paid, common labour. Wages cause competition among workers. And strong workers do not teach
weak workers, but on the contrary exploit them.
The WAGE is the formula “THE STRONG ONE GETS MORE”.
The strong man is fine even in prison. During the history humankind has been guided by the formu-
la: “THE STRONG GETS EVERYTHING”. Therefore, Marx and Lenin are right: WAGE is not a
fair communist principle. So wages will be destroyed by the TOTAL EQUALIZATION under
communism.
THE COMMUNIST PRINCIPLE OF EQUALITY
Theorem. Under communism wages will be abolished. It will be replaced by Russian communist
leaderism: “Strong leader of the weak. AND THE STRONG MAN GIVES MORE!”
The principles of COMMUNISM. Two FORMULAS of communism
Lenin: “I AM THE SAME AS EVERYONE”.
The famous PARTMAXIMUM of Lenin. Wikipedia
 81
81

Lenin forbade himself and the leaders of communism, communist generals, communist scientists
TO HAVE and ACCUMULATE MONEY. Lenin received the same salary as workers did. Accord-
ing to Lenin, the path to communism lies through a new SPARTA!
The LEADER of COMMUNISM should be a leader FOR FREE. The leaders of communism have
NOTHING.
This digression into the theory of communism was necessary in order for the reader to understand
that wage is BOURGEOIS from the point of view of pure communism. This means that the formu-
la:

ܼ ൌ ߠଵ ൅ ߠଶ ൅ ߠଷ ൅ ߠସ ൅ ‫ ڮ‬൅ ൅ߠேିଶ ൅ ߠேିଵ ൅ ߠே

expresses the capitalist principle of inequality.

Theorem. The GOLDEN CONSTANT OF VALUE is the resolution of the contradiction between
the capitalist principle of INEQUALITY (wage) and the communist principle of EQUALITY. We
have:
‫ ݈݀݋݃݊݅ݎܽ݁ݕݎ݁݌݀݁ܿݑ݀݋ݎ݌ݏ݁݅ݐ݅݀݋݉݉݋݂ܿ݋ݏ݁ܿ݅ݎ݌݈݈݂ܽ݋݉ݑݏ݄݁ݐ‬INEQUALITY
࢖ൌ ൌ
‫ݏݎ݁݇ݎ݋ݓ݈݈݂ܽ݋ݏݎݑ݋݄ݎݑ݋ܾ݈݈݈݂ܽܽ݋݉ݑݏ݄݁ݐ‬ EQUALITY

The inequality of the strong and the weak workers is expressed in the numerator, since a strong
worker will produce more commodities than the weak one in the same time. And he lives richer
than a weak worker, and does not help him. A strong worker exploits the weak one. Having agreed
with the foreman, he chooses profitable types of work for himself.

Marx on Aristotle
Marx noted that Aristotle did not discover the LAW OF VALUE for the following reason. He could
not add up one labour hour of a free peasant and one labour hour of a slave and get the number two.
For Aristotle, the sum of 1 hour of a peasant + 1 hour of a slave did not make sense. Of course, 1
hour of a peasant + 1 hour of a slave = 2 from the point of view of mathematics, but 2 of what? We
can say: 2 labour hours of people. But the slave was not a man for Aristotle. He was a talking tool.
Therefore, such an addition for Aristotle was a psychologically impossible operation.
The logical law of inverting pair was discovered by Marx.
An amazing example of a inverting pair. Bourgeois theorists stand upside down, and their conclu-
sion is as follows:
‫݈݀݋݃݊݅ݎܽ݁ݕݎ݁݌݀݁ܿݑ݀݋ݎ݌ݏ݁݅ݐ݅݀݋݉݉݋݂ܿ݋ݏ݁ܿ݅ݎ݌݈݈݂ܽ݋݉ݑݏ݄݁ݐ‬ EQUALITY
‫݌‬ൌ ൌ
‫ݏݎ݁݇ݎ݋ݓ݈݈݂ܽ݋ݏݎݑ݋݄ݎݑ݋ܾ݈݈݈݂ܽܽ݋݉ݑݏ݄݁ݐ‬ INEQUALITY

Theorem. Bourgeois theorists consider that EQUALITY is INEQUALITY, and INEQUALITY is

EQUALITY!
What is wrong with that? There is the answer. There are one working day of an American and one
working day of a Mexican. The working day is ten o’clock for both. We added the times according
to the principle of equality: 10 hours + 10 hours =20 hours. But the bourgeois theorist will be indig-
nant, will scold us and shout: “How could you equate 10 hours of a great American with ten hours
of a Mexican. In mathematics, 10 + 10 equals 20, but in real life who is Mexican and who is a great
American. A Mexican is equal to half an American. And therefore 10 + 10 = 15 hours”.
Lemma. All bourgeois theorists count according to the following formula:
82 82

‫݈݀݋݃݊݅ݎܽ݁ݕݎ݁݌݀݁ܿݑ݀݋ݎ݌ݏ݁݅ݐ݅݀݋݉݉݋݂ܿ݋ݏ݁ܿ݅ݎ݌݈݈݂ܽ݋݉ݑݏ݄݁ݐ‬ INEQUALITY
࢖ൌ ൌ
‫ݏݎ݁݇ݎ݋ݓ݂݋ݏݎݑ݋݄ݎݑ݋ܾ݈݂ܽ݋݉ݑݏ݄݁ݐ‬, ‫ ݕݐ݈݅ܽݑݍ݁݊݅ݐ݊ݑ݋ܿܿܽ݋ݐ݊݅݃݊݅݇ܽݐ‬15ሺ݅݊݁‫ݕݐ݈݅ܽݑݍ‬ሻ

This means that all bourgeois theorists apply INEQUALITY twice.

Consequence. All hundreds of works by all the theorists of ECONOMIC PHYSICS are WRONG!
Why did not the left-wing politics discover the fundamental constant of value?
All the left-wing politics are like Aristotle – they are supporters of the socialist semi-equality, semi-
inequality. Cleaners, weavers, cooks, unskilled workers were actually SOCIAL SLAVES of social-
ism. They are socialist helots (social slaves of the Spartans). With the help of admission examina-
tion, the children of socialist slaves were sent to become socialist slaves. Under socialism, it was
possible to give everyone a higher education. There were an abundance of textbooks, as well as
teachers.
But SOCIALISM WILL NEVER GIVE everyone a HIGHER EDUCATION. Why? Socialist chiefs
need servants to clean toilets, they need personal drivers, hairdressers and cooks.
Questions about the IDENTITY of people (atoms).
This question was solved long ago by Marx. If we average over groups of five people, we will get
similar results. In quantum physics, there are statistics in which particles are considered identical or
different. We use both statistics. They both reflect different sides of reality. The same phenomenon
can take place in the political economy of both capitalism and communism.
ENGELS’ THEOREM in our presentation. Engels: “DIALECTICS OF NATURE”.
PEOPLE are statistical ATOMS of history. According to Engels, the laws of history, political econ-
omy, and philosophy are statistical too.
Thus, the fact that POLITICAL ECONOMY is the same THERMODYNAMICS was actually dis-
covered by Engels.
When was the theory of relativity fully formalized?
The theory of relativity was born as a science only when it was proved that the speed of light is a
fundamental constant and does not depend on the speed of movement of the light source.
When will the political economy of capitalism be fully formalized?
This will happen after the fundamental value constant is calculated, because then formulas based on
it will appear.
Objection No. 1. The law of value is the law of an ideal POLITICAL ECONOMIC GAS. But a so-
ciety consisting only of small-scale producers has never existed either in ancient times or now.
Answer. The ideal gas is examined first. Then the real gases are examined. The theory of ideal gas-
es is the foundation in the theory of real gases. The law of value is also true for the modern market,
but in an indirect form. It can be proved only by calculations.

§ 5.11. Indirect methods of calculating the gold FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANT of value

The fundamental value constant is equal to:

‫ݏ݁݅ݐ݅݀݋݉݉݋݂ܿ݋ݏ݁ܿ݅ݎ݌݈݈݂ܽ݋݉ݑݏ݄݁ݐ‬ሺ‫ݏ݁ܿ݅ݒݎ݁ݏ‬ሻ‫ݏ݁ܿ݅ݎ݌݈݀݋݃݊݅ݎܽ݁ݕ݄݁ݐݎ݋݂݀݁ܿݑ݀݋ݎ݌‬
‫݌‬ൌ
‫ݏݎ݁݇ݎ݋ݓܿ݅ݐ݅ݏܽݎܽ݌ݐ݋݈݈݂݊ܽ݋ݏݎݑ݋݄ݎݑ݋ܾ݈݄ܽ݁ݐ݂݋݉ݑݏ݄݁ݐ‬
 83
83

There is a conditional calculation of the gold fundamental constant of value of the working people
for AvtoVAZ in 2007.

The number of employees is 120,000.

Production of car: 700,000 units.
The price of gold is 25.72 dollars per gram.
The price of an average car is 10,000 dollars.
The number of working days per year is 270.
The number of labour hours in one day is 8.
The percentage of parasites is 30 percent.
The percentage of other people’s components is 35 percent.

There is the gold fundamental constant of value of the worker at AvtoVAZ:

700000 ‫ כ‬10000 ‫ כ‬0.65 ݃‫݈݀݋݂݃݋݉ܽݎ‬

‫݌‬ൌ ൌ 0.975
25,72 ‫ כ‬ሺ120000 ‫ כ‬270 ‫ כ‬8 ‫ כ‬0,7ሻ ݈ܾܽ‫ݎ݁݇ݎ݋ݓܿ݅ݐ݅ݏܽݎܽ݌ݐ݋݄݊݁ݐ݂݋ݎݑ݋݄ݎݑ݋‬

There is the gold fundamental constant of value of the worker at Toyota in 2007.
Data for Toyota company for 2007:
The number of employees is 264,000.
Production of cars: 8,000,000 units.
The price of gold is 25.72 dollars per gram.
The price of an average car is 10,000 dollars.
The number of working days per year is 270.
The number of labour hours in one day is 8.
The percentage of parasites is 30 percent.
The percentage of other people’s components is 35 percent.

The gold fundamental constant of value of the worker at Toyota is:

8000000 ‫ כ‬10000 ‫ כ‬0.65

‫݌‬ൌ ൌ
25.72 ‫ כ‬ሺ264000 ‫ כ‬270 ‫ כ‬8 ‫ כ‬0.‫ כ‬0.7ሻ
ተተ ݃‫݈݀݋݂݃݋݉ܽݎ‬
ൌ 5.065
݈ܾܽ‫ݎ݁݇ݎ݋ݓܿ݅ݐ݅ݏܽݎܽ݌ݐ݋݄݊݁ݐ݂݋ݎݑ݋݄ݎݑ݋‬

There is the gold fundamental constant of value of a worker in a gold mining company in
Russia for 2007.
The number of employees is 550.
The planned gold production is 1 ton per year.
84 84

The percentage of parasites is 30 percent.
So we get:
1000 ‫ כ‬1000 ݃‫݈݀݋݂݃݋݉ܽݎ‬
‫݌‬ൌ ൌ 1.203
550 ‫ כ‬270 ‫ כ‬8 ‫ כ‬0.7 ݈ܾܽ‫ݎ݁݇ݎ݋ݓܿ݅ݐ݅ݏܽݎܽ݌ݐ݋݄݊݁ݐ݂݋ݎݑ݋݄ݎݑ݋‬

How to calculate the percentage of parasites in Russia? It is difficult, but possible. We remind you
that the labour on political economic management is parasitic and is not included in the fundamen-
tal constant of value.

Data on net material product per labour hour for 2006.

In terms of net material products per labour hour, the leader in labour productivity is Norway (37,99
dollars), the United States (35,63 dollars) and France (35,08 dollars).
We will assume that these dates were calculated correctly by the bourgeois, and all parasites are ex-
cluded, and all cleaners are included in these dates.
The price of gold in 2006 is equal to 19.93 dollars per gram.
Let the value added be 90% of the net material products.

There is the gold fundamental constant of value of labour hour of the worker in America in
2006:
35.63 ‫ כ‬0.9 ݃‫݈݀݋݂݃݋݉ܽݎ‬
‫݌‬ൌ ൌ 1.61
19.93 ݈ܾܽ‫ݎ݁݇ݎ݋ݓܿ݅ݐ݅ݏܽݎܽ݌ݐ݋݄݊݁ݐ݂݋ݎݑ݋݄ݎݑ݋‬

The capitalist methodology is possibly wrong. It is quite possible that they consider parasites to be
workers. If we assume that the percentage of parasites is 30%, then the fundamental constant will
increase and become like this:

1.61 ݃‫݈݀݋݂݃݋݉ܽݎ‬
‫ ݌‬ൌ ൌ
0.7 ݈ܾܽ‫ݎ݁݇ݎ݋ݓܿ݅ݐ݅ݏܽݎܽ݌ݐ݋݄݊݁ݐ݂݋ݎݑ݋݄ݎݑ݋‬
ተተ
݃‫݈݀݋݂݃݋݉ܽݎ‬
ൌ 2.3 
݈ܾܽ‫ݎ݁݇ݎ݋ݓܿ݅ݐ݅ݏܽݎܽ݌ݐ݋݄݊݁ݐ݂݋ݎݑ݋݄ݎݑ݋‬
 85
85

Philosophy of the law of value
Bourgeois The law of value
Time is MONEY! Money is TIME!
Karl Marx: “Capitalism is the UPSIDE DOWN WORLD”.
EVERYTHING is upside down in this
A man is a strong and loving man, and a woman is
world! Women are men, and men are
a charming and beloved woman.
women (homosexuals)
Yes, it is true. Money is free under capitalism. But
Fetishes. Advertisement in the store:
man is enslaved! Let’s enslave the money and be-
“Money is freedom in gold”
come free!
Advertisement: “We love you, mortgage” We love our women, and we hate money.
MARX: “MONEY TURNS EVERYTHING INTO ITS OPPOSITE”
Marx’s theory of alienation. MONEY AND COMMANDS turn brothers into STRANGERS
and enemies. It is necessary to kill MONEY (not people) and COMMAND. And the alienation
will disappear. All the people of the planet will become brothers.
Theorem. The law of inverting pair is a general law of logic. It is presented in a logical form in
the authors’ book: “The Mathematized Dialectics of Hegel”. Thus, the mass transition of men
to women in the West is a special case of the general law of logic. The law was discovered by
Marx.
Chapter VI. THE THERMODYNAMIC MODEL of the money market

§ 6.1. Fundamentals of thermodynamics via insulators

The concept of “insulator” makes economic substance.
Types of insulation in thermodynamics
It transfers
It does not from Free It transfers from
Name of insulation from
thermostat heater (refrigerator)
thermostat
Isobaric process
Thermal ߠ ‫݌‬ ܸ ܳ௛௘௔௧௘௥
Isothermal process
Barometric ‫݌‬ ߠ ܸ ܳ௛௘௔௧௘௥
Adiabatic insulation. Adiabatic process
It does not transfer
It does not transfer It does not transfer from thermo-
Free from refrigerator or
from thermostat stat
heater
ߠ ‫݌‬ ܸ ܳ௛௘௔௧௘௥
Isochoric process
It does not
It does not transfer It does not transfer from thermo- It transfers from re-
transfer from
from thermostat stat frigerator or heater
thermostat
ߠ ‫݌‬ ܸ ܳ௛௘௔௧௘௥

Interpretation of the small state market insulators in economics

86 86

Isobaric political economic process
Thermal or price insulation. Money or commodities insulation
Prohibition on ex-
port/import of commodi- Free movement of labour
ties across the border Total quantity Accidental money issue
Fundamental constants of of labour is from the heater to the
The difference in com- not fixed local market is allowed
a man are equal both in
modities prices in the
local and world markets
local and global markets
(thermostat)
Isothermal political economic process
Barometric or value insulation
Prohibition on free movement
Free money transfer Total quantity
of labour Accidental money issue
of labour is
Commodities prices Prices of labour hour are not (or withdrawal) to the
not con-
in local and global equal in local and world mar- strained local market is allowed
markets are equal kets
Adiabatic political economic process
Adiabatic (political) insulation of a small state
Prohibition on acci-
Prohibition on free Random change of
Prohibition on free dental money with-
transfer of commodi- labour total quanti-
movement of labour drawal (or issue) from
ties and money ty is possible
the local market
Choral political economic process
Choral or labour insulation
Prohibition on free Total quantity Accidental money issue
Prohibition on free movement
transfer of commodi- of labour is (or withdrawal) to the
of labour
ties and money highly fixed local market is allowed

Thermodynamic system

Definition. A thermodynamic system: gas + vessel with pairing conditions with a thermostat, and
terms of interaction with a power storage device. In economics, a thermodynamic system is a local
market or a market of one particular small state. The thermostat is the global market. Therefore, we
study the development of an individual market and its interaction with the global market under var-
ious external influences made by power storage devices.
Definition. The pairing conditions of the thermodynamic system and the thermostat are set by dif-
ferent types of insulators.
Definition. The power storage device of a specific parameter is a thermodynamic mechanism capa-
ble of forcibly changing the value of this parameter without forcibly changing the other system pa-
rameters.
 87
87

The power storage device of a specific parameter is an external system both in relation to individual
and global markets. The impact of a particular power storage device should be thermodynamic in
nature. This means that this impact should be exerted in small quantities so that thermodynamic
equilibrium is reached after each of them. The power storage devices are real, i.e. physically realiz-
able, and exist for any parameter and any variable.

§૟. ૛.Hypothesis. Marx’s “COMMODITY” category is a complicated molecule, composed of

two first-order “COMMODITY” categories

Lemma. It follows from the law of the unity of the world that there are several axiomatic theories in
political economics, i.e. categories can be defined differently.
Refutation. Any category runs along the path of a triad, which is only one. Therefore, the category
is single-valued.
Contradiction of refutation. The triad depends on the frame of reference.
There is another way of category formation. A new scheme is of evolutionary nature and irrelevant
to the main graph.
Let’s consider a small-scale producer:

Let’s assume that political economy as a science and its categories have not been established yet, as
well as the “political economic man” category has not been determined.
That is why a small-scale producer is by no means a man in political economics. The “man” catego-
ry must be defined.
Theory. Marx’s political economic man consists of two small-scale producers united in a dialectical
pair.

Theory. Marx’s commodity-molecule consists of TWO COMMODITIES.

Why do we refer to people and not commodities? In fact, they are equivalent. The graph of a com-
plicated molecule is as follows:
88 88


First-order categories
‫ݓ‬ଵ  ‫ݓ‬ଶ ‫ݏ‬ଵ ‫ݏ‬ଶ
the first worker the second worker the first seller The second seller
Multiplying the pairs, we get the second-order categories
‫ݓ‬ଵ ‫ݓ‬ଶ ‫ݓ‬ଵ ‫ݏ‬ଶ ‫ݏ‬ଵ ‫ݓ‬ଶ ‫ݏ‬ଵ ‫ݏ‬ଶ
Doubled worker Worker-seller Seller-worker Doubled seller
Marx’s greatest category "RELATION"
‫ݓ‬ଵ /‫ݓ‬ଶ ‫ݓ‬ଵ /‫ݏ‬ଶ ‫ݏ‬ଵ /‫ݓ‬ଶ ‫ݏ‬ଵ /‫ݏ‬ଶ
First-order categories are embryonic categories, not political economic
Slash means division, comparison, RELATION. As a result of comparison, there are the SEC-
OND-ORDER categories, which are political economic.
Classes. Second-order categories
Cleavage of society of small-scale producers into classes
‫ݓ‬ଵ /‫ݓ‬ଶ ‫ݓ‬ଵ /‫ݏ‬ଶ ‫ݏ‬ଵ /‫ݓ‬ଶ ‫ݏ‬ଵ /‫ݏ‬ଶ
Doubled worker Consumer Seller Doubled seller
proletarians capitalists

Cleavage of society into classes

Lemma. In a small-scale society, there are embryos of the bourgeois and proletarian classes. Divi-
sion of labour arises; sellers and embryos of the proletariat are born. A complex dialectical pair is
divided in half: the bottom half turns into net sellers, which are the embryos of the bourgeoisie; an-
other half becomes net producers, which are the embryos of the proletarians.
Definition of the embryos of the proletarians. The symbols are ‫ݓ‬ଵ ‫ݓ‬ଶ . A proletarian is a doubled
worker, an abstract worker, a tough worker.
From there, the proletarian in the Marx’s Capital means two people and not just one man.
Definition of the embryos of the bourgeoisie. The symbols are ‫ݏ‬ଵ ‫ݏ‬ଶ . The bourgeois is a doubled
seller, an abstract seller, a tough seller, a seller of sellers.
The problem is that there is a contradiction. Our market is an ideal monoatomic gas with two
degrees of freedom. And a diatomic gas molecule consists of two atoms with two degrees of free-
dom. In total, there are three degrees of freedom. One degree of freedom is needed for connection.
But it is necessary to turn attention to calculations of such a gas; whether they are meaningful in
political economy or not?
 89
89

Reason for refutation. We have agreed not to consider evolutionary theories. It is impossible to
match evolutionary categories with available models. The same word in both schemes may have
two different meanings. That is why a contradiction is inevitable.
We only take into consideration available models, in other words, models in which all categories
have already been born. This means that there are no embryonic categories.
Therefore, we believe that the ‘worker’ category has already been born. And he is abstract, not a
real one.
If the hypothesis of a diatomic molecule is true, then:
the ‘commodity’ category is to be understood as two connected commodities. The ‘worker’ catego-
ry is to be understood as two workers or a complex worker, which consists of two united simple
workers.
Results. Until a minimal political economy is created, we will wander about in the dark.

§૟. ૜.Political economy is the human science dealing with the feelings of millions of people
(classes)
The market molecule consists of two people connected in a complicated way. Why does Marx con-
nect them? “MONEY IS THE RELATION OF PEOPLE”. Marx studies the relation of two small-
scale producers since their greedy relations generate money.
Political economy is the human science.
Lenin: “We must express what the people feel”.
Lenin’s theorem: “Political economy is the psychology of classes”.
In this regard, political economy is the psychology of a great many people, while classical psychol-
ogy is the science dealing with the feelings of one person.
In current times there is a world crisis. Millions of people are going crazy. But there are doctors.
Hegel, Marx, Engels, Lenin are great political economic psychologists and even psychiatrists. They
cure millions and even billions of people of anger, greed and squalor.
Conclusion. In place to properly draw up a mathematical model, you need to calculate how many
feelings are in the model and materialize each of them.
Question. Two small-scale producers are faced with each other in the market. How many feelings
do we have?
Answer: Four feelings. Let’s demonstrate this using the example of countertrade transaction:
Small-scale producers
First-order categories
the first Bid the second
First-order mass of com-
‫ܯ‬1 ൌ 10kgofsausages M2=15 kg of sour cream
modities
First-order labour value ܸ1஼ ൌ 25labour hours ܸ2஼ ൌ 20 labour hours

Feelings of the small-scale producers are born in the market

Gluttony 1 He loves sour cream very much
the first
Greed 1 He wants to buy more sour cream at lower price
the second Gluttony 2 He loves sausages very much
90 90

Greed 2 He wants to buy more sausages at lower price


§૟. ૝.Four feelings create a four-parametric model. These feelings materialize in Marx’s
Capital

Karl Marx in the section “MONEY” describes the Hegelian triadic evolution of the VALUE catego-
ry: simple, expanded, universal. In this paragraph, Marx describes the struggle between two greeds.
But there is no conflict between two gluttons.
Hegel’s theorem. Any category of any science faces a triadic logical evolution. The birth of a cate-
gory is impossible in isolation of the triadic logical evolution.
The evolutionary triadic scheme is to build for all categories: gene, set, form, body, essence, phe-
nomenon, temperature, pressure, function, revolution.
Therefore, a logical evolution for the “use value”
category must be created. “Use value” category demonstrates the struggle of two gluttons.
Conclusions. When creating a mathematical model according to Marx’s Capital, it is necessary to
make models of feelings. If we mention only commodities and money, then we will morph into a
bourgeois.
Example. In 30 years after perestroika, not a single theoretician with left-wing views has understood
why the working classes did not begin a fight for socialism? And why? It is because they have be-
come half bourgeois. They constantly write about salaries, benefits, retiring pensions, and free edu-
cation and never – about the feelings of the workers. The leftists are infinitely distant from the peo-
ple. They are blinded to what people think, what they want, what they would fight for. And in order
to find out the feelings of the workers, one has to work in the mines for six months, in which event
everyone would have known 30 years ago. But nobody went.
The objective aim. Materializing a statistical physics model. Atoms are small-scale producers. But
there are the following questions:
1. What parameters of a small-scale producer are observable?
2. How do molecules collide with each other? What happens then?
3. What variables are phase variables?
4. How to make a vessel model in which molecules of small-scale producers are running?
5. The small-scale producer molecule hit the vessel walls and bounced off. What is the
meaning of this?
Is a statistical physics model possible with these complicated molecules?
 91
91

6.5. Lenin’s theorem on THE DUALITY of peasants-small-scale producers
Lenin’s theorem. A peasant-small-scale producer is a dual political economic organism. The peas-
ant-small-scale producer is a dialectical pair:

Consequence. On the one hand, he is a WORKER and has the working-class ideology. On the other
hand, he is a petit bourgeois and has a bourgeois ideology. He is a heavy speculator and profits from
famine in cities since he can strike it rich.

The ambiguous behavior of peasants-small-scale producers during the Russian Civil War
The Bolsheviks gave peasants-small-scale producers land that they never had. All the peasants
rushed to the Bolsheviks, shouting: “Bolsheviks are such good guys!”
But there is famine in the cities. People are dying. The Bolsheviks forced the food rationing into
application and began to punish for speculation and greed for gain from the mass death of towns-
people.
Then the peasants, shouting: “Bolsheviks are such bad guys”, rushed to the Whites. But Whites are
upstairs. White generals shot the peasants who took the masters’ lands in possession.
Then the peasants, shouting: “Whites are such bad guys!”, rushed right back to the Bolsheviks. So
they ran back and forth over and over again!
Lenin explained to the communist workers the ambiguous behavior of the peasants with his theo-
rem. And why? Lenin inculcated a SCIENTIFIC WORLDVIEW in people. He fulfilled Marx’s
precepts: “To talk to workers only in a SCIENTIFIC LANGUAGE”. Lenin tried to teach the social-
ist leaders the theorems of dialectics. But the socialist leaders were reluctant to study. Dog-like,
they bit Lenin from all sides.

§ 6.6. Axiomatic construction of the set of rational numbers coincides with the method of
Marx

The set of rational numbers ܳ is created from a set of natural numbers ܰin the following method:
1) Pairs of natural numbers ሺ݉; ݊ሻ are considered from the direct product ܰ ൈ ܰ.
2) An equivalence RELATION on the set of these pairs is introduced.
3) The factor – set theorem is applied.
The obtained factor – set is the set of fractions ܳ.

Marx’s method. Marx does the very same:

1) He considers many pairs of commodities.
2) He introduces an equivalence RELATION on the pairs set.
3) And then factors it.
But political economy is not a commutative system. Otherwise, we would have two feelings: greed
and gluttony, but in actual practice there are four feelings – two greed and two gluttony. We present
Marx’s theorems:
92 92

Marx’s theorem: “MONEY is a RELATION OF PEOPLE”.
Marx’s theorem “Money is an equivalence RELATION on the set of PEOPLE pairs”. We observe
that the equivalences in Marx’s Capital are more complicated than in the theory of rational num-
bers. Analogies must be sought in the theory of non-commutative groups.
The creation of the “use value” category
There are two observable parameters in the barter market
Small-scale producers
First-order categories st
1 Bid the second
First-order mass of com- M2=15 kg of sour cream
‫ܯ‬1 ൌ 10݇݃‫ݐ݄ܽ݁݉ܿ݊ݑ݈݂݋‬
modities (smetana)
First-order labour value ܸ1஼ ൌ 25labour hours ܸ2஼ ൌ 20 labour hours

The first small-scale producer produces sausages. Sausages have no use value for him since it is
commercially made. Nevertheless, his sausages have a use value for the second small-scale produc-
er. By analogy, smetana (sour cream) produced by the second small-scale producer has a use value
for the first small-scale producer.

Small-scale producers
First-order use values.
the first the second
They are embryonic categories
of the first small scale M2=15 kg of smetana
producer Use value 1 (sour cream)
of the second small
M1=10 kg of sausages
Use value 2 scale producer

The Marx’s greatest “RELATION” category

A graph edge is a relation between two points. The use value category is the graph edge, so we got
another visualization of Marx’s “RELATION” category.
Let’s compare two embryonic use values. On the set of first-order embryonic use values, we intro-
duce an EQUIVALENCE RELATION. Let’s factorize. The scientific use value category was creat-
ed. Marx’s scientific use value is the second-order value. We get:
MarxԢsscientificusevalue ൌ
ቮ ൌ  embryonicusevalueൗ
embryonicusevalue

The first-order use value is also a relation between small-scale producers. Then Marx’s use value is
the RELATION between RELATIONS. Marx’s scheme coincides with Lenin’s theorem on the
LAW.
Lenin’s theorem on the LAW. Version 1.
1. The law is a RELATION. First-order theorems.
2. The law is a RELATION between RELATIONS. Second-order theorems.
Lenin’s theorem on the LAW. Version 2.
1. The law is the ESSENCE. First-order theorems.
 93
93

2. The law is the ESSENCE of ESSENCES. Second-order theorems
Lenin defines all classes and states through the RELATION (of many people) category. Lenin pre-
sents all the theorems in PAIRS, two by two. He acts like a mathematician, like a mathematical ma-
chine.

§ 6.7. Small-scale production operates according to the following scheme:

Consumed-Produced-Sold-Bought:࡯ െ ࡼ െ ࡿ െ ࡮.

We analyze Marx’s scheme: «ɋɨmmodity – Money – ɋɨmmodity». We have:

‫ܥ‬ଵ ՜ ‫ܯ‬ଵ ՜ ‫ܥ‬ଶ ՜ ‫ܯ‬ଶ ՜ ‫ܥ‬ଷ ՜ ‫ܯ‬ଷ  ՜ ‫  ڮ‬՜.
Transition theory in a simple dialectical pair. Marx describes endless transitions in a simple dialec-
tical pair: Commodity – Money. These transitions are similar to transitions in a Wave – Particle
pair. Marx’s scheme needs to be expanded to fully formalize political economy. We get:
Produced െ Sold െ Bought െ Consumed
อ ܲ ՜ ܵ ՜ ‫ ܤ‬՜ ‫ܥ‬
ܲଵ ՜ ܵଵ ՜ ‫ܤ‬ଵ ՜ ‫ܥ‬ଵ ՜ ܲଶ ՜ ܵଶ ՜ ‫ܤ‬ଶ ՜ ‫ܥ‬ଶ ՜ ‫  ڮ‬՜.

The transition theory in a double, complex dialectical pair. The new formula describes transitions
not in a simple, but in a complex pair, where each transition is a logical theorem that must be ex-
plained.
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
What is the dimension of the small െ scaleproducer vector? We identify the small-scale producer
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ‫ڂ‬COMMODITY
category with the assembly LABOUR ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ vectors. The product of these vectors forms
the main political-economy graph with 16 branches.
Results. A small-scale producer is a 16 vector dimension.

§ 6.8. What dimension does the vector ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ

PROLETARIAN have in a capitalist, non-small-scale so-
ciety?
Incorrect assumptions: the proletarian

ishiredforoneday;
sellshisLabourPower;
ተ getsmoneyinthemorning;
buysfood;
ተ
consumesfood;
producescommoditiesforthecapitalist.

These assumptions are wrong, but so far we are not interested in it.
We accept without justification that the formula of the proletarian is as follows:
94 94

We get that the proletarian and the bourgeois are four-dimensional vectors. The proletarian func-
tions according to the scheme:

Sold െ Produced െ Bought െ Consumed

Result 1. It makes no sense to determine the dimensions of vectors (and people) until it is indicated
to which space we are working. On the graph COMMODITY ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ the vectors have eight coordinates, and
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ  ‫  ׫‬COMMODITY
on the main political economic graph LABOUR ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ the vectors have sixteen coordi-
nates.
Result 2. There can be several such chains in the Marx’s CAPITAL.
ܲଵ ՜ ܵଵ ՜ ‫ܤ‬ଵ ՜ ‫ܥ‬ଵ ՜ ܲଶ ՜ ܵଶ ՜ ‫ܤ‬ଶ ՜ ‫ܥ‬ଶ ՜ ‫  ڮ‬՜.
Comparison of author chains and Karl Marx chains.
Chain of authors:
ܲଵ ՜ ܵଵ ՜ ‫ܤ‬ଵ ՜ ‫ܥ‬ଵ ՜ ܲଶ ՜ ܵଶ ՜ ‫ܤ‬ଶ ՜ ‫ܥ‬ଶ ՜ ‫  ڮ‬՜.
It is formed by four categories:ܲ, ܵ, ‫ܤ‬, ‫ܥ‬.
The Marx Chain money - commodity:
moneyଵ ՜ commodityଵ ՜ moneyଶ ՜ commodityଶ ՜ ‫  ڮ‬՜.
It is formed by only two categories. Why?
Marx studies only values. Value categories are entities. But now we need to add things cate-
gories to Marx's CAPITAL. And then we will have not three volumes of CAPITAL, but six vol-
umes of Marx's CAPITAL.
Result 3. Our aim is not to prove great theorems. We just need to involve mathematicians and phys-
icists to modeling the grandiose work of Karl Marx’s CAPITAL.
Ultimately, it is necessary to create a mathematical model that accurately predicts the date and scale
of the new global crisis. Therefore, we strive to show the beauty of Marx’s CAPITAL, to show
what beautiful tasks are hidden in this great work. But it is useless to start modeling Marx’s CAPI-
TAL without a minimal and axiomatic system.
 95
95

Chapter VII. PROCESSES in political economic thermodynamics

§ 7.1. Isobaric process with a heater in physics

Physics Marx’s political economy

Isobaric process
1 Thermostat World market. Small-scale production
2 Thermodynamic system Local small-scale market-state
The piston is frictionless,
Free movement of workers to and from the world market
so it passes pressure‫݌‬
Consequence. The pressure Consequence. The fundamental constant of value of a work-
of the system and the er of the local market and the world market are always equal
thermostat are always to each other
equal Transition period
Migrant workers work. They sell their commodities at the
local market.
They send money home to the thermostat. Money transfer is
3 allowed only during the transition process.
The end of the first transition period.
Option No.1. After the end of the first transition period, mi-
grant workers were forbidden to send money home to the
thermostat.
Option No.2. After the end of the first transition period, mi-
grant workers were not forbidden to send money home to the
thermostat.
The working day‫ ݎ‬remains constant and is equal to eight
hours: ‫ ݎ‬ൌ 8. It is fixed by the law of the state. There are no
labour reserves on the local market.
The market is calculated in one week. Number of working
days is 5. ݀ ൌ 5
Insulators
of temperature of commodities and money
4 The piston and the vessel are made of a
Traders, commodities and money are not al-
rigid heat-insulating material. They do
lowed to cross the border.
not pass the temperature.
Heater
5 The heaterܳ is inside the vessel. It is not A treasure of gold coins ܳ was found inside
connected to thermostat. ܳ is thermal the market.
energy, the energy entering the system Example. During the renovation of an Indian
using the phenomenon with the help of temple, the authorities found treasures worth
thermal conductivity. 22 billion dollars. ܳis the money value.
It is important, that the money is divided
equally for everyone. But they are transferred
to the hands in small parts.
96 96


The rule of signs in the first law of thermodynamicsߜܳ ൌ ܷ݀ ൅ ߜ‫ܣ‬

The energy of the thermostat or heater transferred to the gas in a thermo-
ܳ
dynamic way Positive
The money value of the heater or the world market transferred to the local
ܳ
market in a thermodynamic way
Example. 5000 rubles (grams of gold) came from the local market to the Negative
ܳ
thermostat. Then ܳ ൌ െ5000
‫ܣ‬ Gas work against the thermostat or against an external force Positive
This is the real work of real people of the local market. The value that they Positive
‫ܣ‬
create is called the NEW VALUE.
Example. An external force compress the gas and perform 100 joules of Negative
‫ܣ‬
work at the same time, then‫ ܣ‬ൌ െ100 joules
ܷ Internal gas energy Positive
ܷ Is the market value old?

The first law of thermodynamics in physics.

Theorem. The thermostat energy ߜܳ, transferred to the gas in a thermodynamic way, is spent on
changing the internal energy of the gas and on the operation of the gas against the thermostat:
ߜܳ ൌ ܷ݀ ൅ ߜ‫ܣ‬
 97
97

The first law of thermodynamics in political economic thermodynamics.
Theorem. The money value of the world market ߜܳ, transferred to the local market in a market way,
is spent on changing the total market value and creating new value by the workers of the local mar-
ket:
ߜܳ ൌ ܷ݀ ൅ ߜ‫ܣ‬
There is a description of the isobaric process. After slow operation of the heater, an isobaric expan-
sion of the thermodynamic system occurred. For simplicity, we can assume that the temperature of
the thermostat and the initial temperature of the thermodynamic system are equal to each other:
ܶ ൌ ܶଵ .
The ideal gas law:
‫ ܸ݌‬ൌ ߥܴߠଵ
ฬ ଵ ֜ ‫݌‬ሺܸଶ െ ܸଵ ሻ ൌ ߥܴሺߠଶ െ ߠଵ ሻ ֜ ‫݌‬ȟܸ ൌ ߥܴȟɅ
‫ܸ݌‬ଶ ൌ ߥܴߠଶ
The change in the internal energy of a two-dimensional gas:
ȟܷ ൌ ߥܴ݀ȟ.
The gas expansion of the system is as follows: ȟ‫ ܣ‬ൌ ‫݌‬ȟߠ.
Consequence. The increase in the internal energy of the gas is equal to the work of the gas:
‫ ܣ‬ൌ ‫݌‬ȟܸ ൌ ߥܴȟɅ ൌ οܷ
The first law of thermodynamics:
ܳ ൌ οܷ ൅ ‫ܣ‬
Consequence.
ܳ
‫ ܣ‬ൌ 
ተ 2
ܳ
οܷ ൌ
2
Final volume:
ܳ ܳ ܳ ܳ
‫ ܣ‬ൌ ‫݌‬ȟܸ ൌ ֜ ȟܸ ൌ ֜ ܸଶ െ ܸଵ ൌ ֜ ܸଶ ൌ ܸଵ ൅
2 2‫݌‬ 2‫݌‬ 2‫݌‬
Final temperature:
ܳ ܳ ܳ ܳ
ȟܷ ൌ ߥܴȟɅ ൌ ֜ ȟɅ ൌ ֜ ߠଶ െ ߠଵ ൌ ֜ ߠଶ ൌ ߠଵ ൅
2 2ߥܴ 2ߥܴ 2ߥܴ
We transform:
ߥൌܰ ܳ
ቚ ֜ ߠଶ ൌ ߠଵ ൅
ܴൌ1 2ܰ
We calculate the entropy and have:

ߜܳ ൌ ܷ݀ ൅ ݀‫ܣ‬
อ ܷ݀ ൌ ߥܴ݀ߠ ֜ ߜܳ ൌ ߥܴ݀ߠ ൅ ‫ܸ݀݌‬
݀‫ ܣ‬ൌ ‫ܸ݀݌‬
The ideal gas law:

‫ ܸ݌‬ൌ ߥܴߠ ֜ ‫ ܸ݀݌‬ൌ ߥܴ݀ߠ

We get:
98 98

ߜܳ ൌ ߥܴ݀ߠ ൅ ‫ ܸ݀݌‬ൌ 2ߥܴ݀ߠ
The second law of thermodynamics:
ఏమ
ߜܳ ݀ߠ ߠଶ
݀ܵ ൌ ֜ ȟܵ ൌ 2ߥܴ න ൌ 2ߥܴ‫ ݊ܮ‬൬ ൰
ߠ ߠ ߠଵ
ఏభ

Entropy:
ܳ
ߠଶ ߠଵ ൅
ȟܵ ൌ 2ߥܴ‫ ݊ܮ‬ൌ 2ߥܴ‫ ݊ܮ‬ቌ 2ܰ ቍ
ߠଵ ߠଵ

We transform:
ߥ ൌ ܰ ܳ
ቚ ֜ ȟܵ ൌ 2ܰ‫ ݊ܮ‬൬1 ൅ ൰
ܴ ൌ 1 2ܰߠଵ

Total heat capacity:

ߜܳ 2ߥܴ݀ߠ
ߜܳ ൌ ‫ܥ‬௣ ݀ߠ ֜ ‫ܥ‬௣ ൌ ൌ ൌ 2ߥܴ ൌ 2ܰ
݀ߠ ݀ߠ

§ 7.2. Is the physical isobaric process with a heater a political economic process?

The isobaric process in political economy

The equation of the state of the small-scale market in two versions
‫ ܸ݌‬ൌ ߥܴߠ ‫ ܸ݌‬ൌ ܰ݇ߠ
There is a market with two commodities: leather and boots
The entire population is divided into four variable categories.
Consumers Producers Sellers Buyers
They consume the purchased They produce boots
leather, make it suitable for They sell boots They buy leather
the production of boots
These categories are variables. Every small-scale producer goes through all four categories. If
today he produces boots, tomorrow he will sell them.
A treasure with money value Q is found. The money value of the treasure enters the market in
small portions. Market demand increased by a small value.
A serious problem
We assume that for a small period of time ο‫ ݐ‬the money valueοܳ entered the market. It will be
divided equally into four categories of small-scale commodities. But consumers cannot use this
money instantly, they are busy with work. Only buyers can use this money, they will buy more.
The other two categories save money.
Market prices are rising. The same happens with the right side of the equation: ‫ ܸ݌‬ൌ ߥܴߠ.
Then the left side of the equation of state also begins to rise, it means the value‫ ܸ݌‬rises. But
 99
99

since the length of the working day is limited by law, the fundamental constant of value ‫ ݌‬be-
gins to rise. The local market workers are getting richer than the thermostat workers, the world
market workers.
Immigration begins. Workers from the world market are transferred to the local market. The
volume of labour time ܸ grows. The consumer mass is also growing. Prices fall until the fun-
damental constants of the local market and the world market are equal.
These empirical considerations show that the isobaric process in political thermodynamics is
possible.
ொ
In physics, we got‫ ܣ‬ൌ ȟܷ ൌ . This is logical, variable‫ ܣ‬is the real work of workers, and the
ଶ
variableȟܷ is the additional profit of traders. But traders and workers are the same people.
Therefore, the division is equally.
ொ
The value‫ ܣ‬ൌ ‫݌‬ȟܸ ൌ is the newly created value by immigrants.
ଶ
Our model is money, not VALUE. The measure of value in it is gold.
Entropy is the total use value. Use value has increased:
ܳ
ȟܵ ൌ 2ܰ‫ ݊ܮ‬൬1 ൅ ൰
2ܰߠଵ
ொ
We have: ‫ ݔ‬՜ 0 ֜ ‫݊ܮ‬ሺ1 ൅ ‫ݔ‬ሻ~‫ݔ‬. We get: ܰ ՜ λ ֜ ȟܵ~
ఏభ
The total consumer mass is the thermal mass or the total heat capacity. The total heat capacity
of the isobaric process is equal to:‫ܥ‬௣ ൌ 2ܰ.
Probably, the total consumer mass has grown if we compare it with the heat capacity‫ܥ‬௏ ൌ
ܰ.But the authors could not convincingly formulate in economic terms the fact of an increase
in the consumer mass.
Commodity mass ܰ. The commodity mass remained constant. But how can it be? After all, ad-
ditional workers have arrived on the local market. It is possible if labour productivity is falling.
Probably, we need a model of a thermodynamic system with a variable gas mass? No, the
problem is more complicated.
How many migrant workers have arrived at the local market?
We calculate the market in one week. Number of working days: ݀ ൌ 5
The working day is equal to eight hours: ‫ ݎ‬ൌ 8
୼௏ ୼௏ ୼௏
So the number of migrant workers is equal to: ݊ ൌ ൌ ൌ
௥ௗ ଼ήହ ସ଴
Local workers (not migrant workers) earned: ‫ܣ‬ଵ ൌ ‫ܸ݌‬ଵ

There is what migrant workers created in the local market

ȟܸ Labour value
ொ
Thrice abstract value or just VALUE. A ൌ , but the value A is not money value.
ଶ
A ൌ pȟܸ ொ
It is measured by .
ଶ
ܳ ܳ Use value. Additional use value is the carrier of thrice ab-
ȟܵ ൌ 2ܰ‫ ݊ܮ‬൬1 ൅ ൰ൎ
2ܰߠଵ ߠଵ stract value (VALUE) A
ܳ Migrant workers sold their commodities. They traded their
ߥܴȟɅ ൌ abstract VALUE for a money value
ொ
2 ଶ
Results
Thermostat Local market. What is left in the local market?
100 100

There is an additional use valueȟܵ. It is the carrier of thrice abstract val-
Migrant workers
ue or a VALUE. Its value is equal toA.
took out the money
ொ
value to the ther- There is money value
ொ ଶ
mostat ொ
ଶ Money value is for servicing (exchange) use value ȟܵ.
ଶ
The end of the first transition process
After the end of the first transition process, migrant workers are forbid-
den to send money to the thermostat.
Option No.1
Migrant workers stay on the local market forever. They merge with the
indigenous people.
After the end of the first transition process, migrant workers are not for-
Option No.2
bidden to send money to the thermostat.
The second transition process is isobaric compression
Theorem. Isobaric compression will be with the refrigerator.
ொ
The active parameter causing market fluctuations will be the money value
ଶ
Proof. The process will be isobaric
When there is a leakage of migrant workers’ money into the thermostat, the money value in
the local market decreases֜prices fall֜ the fundamental constant of value of a person de-
creases ֜ migrant workers return home to the thermostat. But they return in small groups, not
at once. Moreover, the fundamental constant will fluctuate around the fundamental constant
of the thermostat. The isobaric process is justified. But will it be with the refrigerator?
ொ
Question. Migrant workers have money value . They send money in small parts. But can
ଶ
ொ
they send all their money in the amount of .
ଶ
First answer: They can, because it is their money, but it is complicated.
Lemma. The stationary systems in the thermodynamics are statistical models.
Consequence. We assume that if the market worked for one hour, there would be an infinite
number of transitionsܶଵ ՜ ‫ܦ‬ଵ ՜ ܶଶ ՜ ‫ܦ‬ଶ ՜ ‫ ڮ‬՜ ܶ௡ ՜ ‫ܦ‬௡ ՜ήήή
Here can be some problems. Migrant workers sent some of the money to the thermostat. Then
they produced, sold, bought, and so on. And in the end they lost it. The stationary models are
conservation laws, where everything should be preserved.
So, we have proved that the isobaric process can be considered a process with a refrigerator.
But there is another contradiction.
୼௏
The number of migrant workers is equal to: ݊ ൌ . They will work for one week and the to-
ସ଴
tal labour time will be equal toȟܸ. They will take their labour valueȟܸ and go to the thermo-
stat. So, they will produce the work ‫ ܣ‬ൌ ‫݌‬ȟܸ in the world market (thermostat).
The problem is that there is a contradiction. After all, they leave in small groups. The remain-
ing part continues to work in the local market. And so part of the work‫ ܣ‬ൌ ‫݌‬ȟܸ must remain
in the local market. How to resolve the contradiction? There is the answer.
So, some of the migrant workers have left and now they are working in the thermostat, and
the other part of the migrant workers continues to work in the local market. The second part
sells commodities and money to the thermostat. And then one more group of migrant workers
worked for a week and now they are leaving. The second transition process ended with some
kind of result.
We get: work of those who went home + work of those who stay – work of those who stay =
work of those who went home. It is obvious. It is all about the sign. The work of those who
went home should be positive for the thermostat and negative from the point of view of the
 101
101

local market.
Second answer. The VALUE after the first transition period is called the old value. And the
value born in the second transition period is called the new value. Thus, from the point of
view of physics, work in political economy is only work on creating new value. The work in
political economy to create old value is not work from the point of view of physics.
So, the isobaric process with refrigerator seems to be justified. Results
ொ
All migrant workers will leave and take with them the money value
ଶ
The market will return to the state it was before the first transition process. There will be
nothing left of theܳ treasure. The world market has taken the money value from the local
market.

Question. If the working day is not established by law and the border is open for workers, what will
happen? Will local workers increase their labour hours, or will migrant workers get ahead of them?
Answer. We need to specify additional conditions. For example: local workers are lazy, and migrant
workers are hardworking ones. Or local workers are educated, and migrant workers are illiterate
ones.
The theorem of the great Friedrich Engels is that “MAN IS A STATISTICAL ATOM OF HISTO-
RY” from the book “Dialectics of nature”.
Here is a migrant worker as a molecule of political economy gas. We know that in order to intro-
duce an external molecule into a vessel with a gas, it is necessary to expend additional energy,
which is given by a special chemical potential. The pressure ‫ ݌‬in the formula ‫ ܣ‬ൌ ‫݌‬ȟܸ is that
chemical potential for workers. A migrant worker must withstand competition in the new labour
market. A competition is the pressure.
The dialectical pair of worker-money is a pair of electron-hole
The worker leaves the thermostat and comes to a new local market, and a hole is formed in its old
place. The money in the amount of ‫ ܣ‬ൌ ‫݌‬ȟܸ goesfrom the local market to the thermostat and clos-
es this hole.
Lemma. The small-scale market creates unemployment and a reserve army of labour.
Justification. In the isobaric process, excess workers can leave the local market for the thermostat,
the world market. The workers of the local market are made superfluous by the law of value in the
ideal gas equation.
We can use the people accumulator in the form of heater-refrigerator instead of the thermostat. In
economics, this accumulator is called the reserve army of labour or the class of the unemployed.
Thus, unemployment and the reserve army of labour exist in a small-scale society, but in an embry-
onic state.
Each such transition in thermodynamics has its own chemical potential.

Accumulators Functioning of accumulators

The volume enhancer Thermostat workers come to the local market if neces-
of the labour-power sary
Thermostat -
world market Excess workers are not needed by the local market due to
The volume reductor
the law of value, and they leave the local market and go
of the labour-power
to the thermostat
Unemployed The volume enhancer Unemployed people find work in the local market
102 102

class. Reserve of the labour-power
Army of La- The volume reductor Excess workers of the local market go to the unemployed
bour of the labour-power class

§ 7.3. Is a physical isochoric process with a heater a process in political economy?

Physical isochoric process with a heater

Thermodynamic calculation in physics.

The ideal gas law:
‫݌‬ଵ ܸ ൌ ߥܴߠଵ
ฬ ֜ ሺ‫݌‬ଶ െ ‫݌‬ଵ ሻܸ ൌ ߥܴሺߠଶ െ ߠଵ ሻ ֜ ܸȟ‫ ݌‬ൌ ߥܴȟɅ
‫݌‬ଶ ܸ ൌ ߥܴߠଶ

Internal energy of a gas: οܷ ൌ ߥܴοߠ.

The work of a gas in an isochoric process is zero: ߜ‫ ܣ‬ൌ ‫ ܸ݀݌‬ൌ 0
The first law of thermodynamics:
ܳ ൌ οܷ ൅ ‫ ܣ‬ൌ οܷ
Consequence. The energy of the heater increases the internal energy of the gas:
οܷ ൌ ߥܴοߠ ൌ ܳ
ฬ
οܷ ൌ ܸȟ‫ ݌‬ൌ ܳ
Final pressure:
ܳ ܳ
ܸȟ‫ ݌‬ൌ ܳ ֜ ȟ‫ ݌‬ൌ ֜ ‫݌‬ଶ ൌ ‫݌‬ଵ ൅
ܸ ܸ
Final temperature:
ܳ ܳ
ߥܴȟɅ ൌ ܳ ֜ ȟɅ ൌ ֜ ߠଶ ൌ ߠଵ ൅
ߥܴ ߥܴ
We transform:

ߥൌܰ ܳ
ቚ ֜ ߠଶ ൌ ߠଵ ൅
ܴൌ1 ܰ
Entropy:
 103
103

ߜܳ ൌ ܷ݀ ൅ ݀‫ܣ‬
อ ܷ݀ ൌ ߥܴ݀ߠ ֜ ߜܳ ൌ ߥܴ݀ߠ
݀‫ ܣ‬ൌ ‫ ܸ݀݌‬ൌ 0

The second law of thermodynamics:

ఏమ
ߜܳ ݀ߠ ߠଶ
݀ܵ ൌ ֜ ȟܵ ൌ ߥܴ න ൌ ߥܴ‫݊ܮ‬
ߠ ߠ ߠଵ
ఏభ

Entropy:
ܳ
ߠଶ ߠଵ ൅
ȟܵ ൌ ߥܴ‫ ݊ܮ‬ൌ ߥܴ‫݊ܮ‬ ܰ
ߠଵ ߠଵ

We transform:

ߥ ൌ ܰ ܳ ܳ
ቚ ֜ ȟܵ ൌ ܰ‫ ݊ܮ‬൬1 ൅ ൰ൎ
ܴ ൌ 1 ܰߠଵ ߠଵ

Total heat capacity:

ߜܳ ߥܴ݀ߠ
ߜܳ ൌ ‫ܥ‬௏ ݀ߠ ֜ ‫ܥ‬௏ ൌ ൌ ൌ ߥܴ ൌ ܰ
݀ߠ ݀ߠ

Axioms of the isochoric market with a heater

1) An isochoric market is an isolated market by definition. This means a complete prohibition of the
movement of labour, money, commodities, and traders. We can assume that the isochoric market is
the world market, and that there are no other markets on the planet.
2) A money mass of volume ܳ is randomly come into the isochoric market from the heater. The
market leaves of equilibrium state, and after long fluctuations it enters a new equilibrium state. We
need to define all the characteristics of the transition period.
3) The market has no reserves of labour power. Labour power cannot be attracted from other indus-
tries. Workers are not allowed to reduce or increase their working time. So, the labour value ܸ is
established by law on the same level as state violence.

Results of the isochoric process with a heater in political economy

The labour value is constant according to the con-
ܸ ܸ ൌ ܿ‫ݐݏ݊݋‬
dition of the task.
The fundamental constant of human value. ܳ
‫݌‬ ‫݌‬ଶ ൌ ‫݌‬ଵ ൅
ܸ
The price of a unit of consumer mass of commod-
ܳ
Ʌ ities will grow due to an increase of the funda- ߠଶ ൌ ߠଵ ൅
mental constant. ܰ
The total use value of commodities (entropy) in- ܳ ܳ
S creases. ȟܵ ൌ ܰ‫ ݊ܮ‬൬1 ൅ ൰ൎ
ܰߠଵ ߠଵ
The total consumer mass (heat capacity) is equal
ʠ௏ ‫ܥ‬௏ ൌ ܰ
to N.
ܰ The commodity mass is the same.
104 104

New thrice abstract value (VALUE) was not cre-
‫ܣ‬ ‫ܣ‬ൌ0
ated.

The theory of duality between people and commodities

‫ܸ݌‬ ܰ݇ܶ
Supply Demand
People Commodities
Real work of real people Trade
Production Trade
Distribution of valueܳ between production and trade
Zero ܳ
Workers do not get money from an All additional amounts go to trade, to DE-
external heater. MAND.
Additional supply is zero. The value ܳ is the sum of the additional de-
mand.
The valueܸ do not change as a sup- But the number of commodities is un-
ply according to the isochoric pro- changed, and therefore prices will increase by
cess the amount ofܳ
Law of supply and demand: ܳ
‫ ܸ݌‬ൌ ܰ݇ߠଶ ߠଶ ൌ ߠଵ ൅
ܰ݇
So, the supply ‫ ܸ݌‬will increase in value.
But the supply of the quantity of labour ܸ in labour values is constant. And there-
fore, the fundamental constant ‫ ݌‬will grow.

What does an increase in prices and an increase in the fundamental constant mean in an isochoric
isolated market?
Answer. It means the inflation of gold money. The quantity of prices has changed here. Nothing has
changed in the economy. New value was not created.
This means that the TOTAL QUANTITY OF VALUES was not increased, it is still the same. Alt-
hough the quantity of gold has increased.
CONCLUSION
GOLD-THING IS NOT A VALUE! Gold is money, gold money. Gold money is also subject to in-
flation, but the VALUE of inflation is not subject to inflation.

§ 7.4. Is a physical isothermal process with a volume reductor a process in political economy?

Physical isothermal compression with volume reductor and thermostat

 105
105


Description of isothermal compression in physics.

The walls of the vessel and the piston are thin, but rigid. Therefore, they pass the temperature. We
open the piston clamps and start pressing on the piston. We press slowly so that the excess heat can
escape through the thin walls of the vessel during the time. We compress the gas until the volume of
the gas is equal to ܸଶ . And then we close the piston clamps again.
During compression, the gas temperature increases slowly and becomes higher than the thermostat
temperature. The walls of a thermodynamic system pass the temperature, and therefore excess heat
passes through the walls into the thermostat. And the temperatures of the system and the thermostat
equalize again. This happens many times on small changes in all parameters. And, in the end, the
thermodynamic system comes to a new equilibrium state ሺ‫݌‬ଶ , ܸଶ , ߠሻ.
Thermodynamic calculation in physics.
The ideal gas law:
‫݌‬ଵ ܸଵ ൌ ߥܴߠ
ߥܴߠ
อ‫݌‬ଶ ܸଶ ൌ ߥܴߠ  ֜ ‫ ݌‬ൌ
‫ ܸ݌‬ൌ ߥܴߠ ܸ

Final pressure:
ߥܴߠ
‫݌‬ଶ ൌ
ܸଶ
The change in the internal energy of the gas is: οܷ ൌ ߥܴοߠ ൌ 0.
The work of an external force against a gas in an isothermal process is:
െߜ‫ ܣ‬൐ 0;
௏ ௏ ఔோఏ ௏
ߜ‫ ܣ‬ൌ ‫ ܣ ֜ ܸ݀݌‬ൌ ‫׬‬௏ మ ‫ ܸ݀݌‬ൌ ‫׬‬௏ మ ܸ݀ ൌ ߥܴߠ‫ ݊ܮ‬ቀ మቁ ൏ 0.
భ భ ௏ ௏భ

The first law of thermodynamics:

ܳ ൌ οܷ ൅ ‫ ܣ‬ൌ ‫ ܣ‬൏ 0
Consequence. All the work of external forces against the gas went to increase the internal energy of
the thermostat:
We have:

ߜܳ ൌ ܷ݀ ൅ ߜ‫ ܣ‬ൌ ߜ‫ ܣ‬൏ 0

The second law of thermodynamics:

106 106

ఏ
ߜܳ ݀‫ܣ‬
݀ܵ ൌ ֜ ȟܵ ൌ න ൌ0
ߠ ߠ
ఏ

Total heat capacity:

ߜܳ ߜܳ
ߜܳ ൌ ‫ܥ‬௏ ݀ߠ ֜ ‫ܥ‬௏ ൌ ൌ ൌ െλ
݀ߠ 0
Results of the isothermal process with a volume reductor in political economy
The labour value decreased according to the con-
ܸ ܸଶ ൏ ܸଵ
dition of the task.
The fundamental constant of human value in- ߥܴߠ
‫݌‬ creased. ‫݌‬ଶ ൌ ൐ ‫݌‬ଵ
ܸଶ
The price of a unit of consumer mass of commod-
Ʌ ities is constant and is equal to the price on the Ʌ ൌ ܿ‫ݐݏ݊݋‬
world market.
The total use value of commodities (entropy) did
S ȟܵ ൌ 0
not change.
The total consumer mass (heat capacity) is equal
ʠ ʠ ൌ െλ
to minus infinity.
ܰ The commodity mass is the same.
Thrice abstract value (VALUE) decreased. ܸଶ
‫ܣ‬ ‫ ܣ‬ൌ ߥܴߠ‫ ݊ܮ‬൬ ൰ ൏ 0
ܸଵ

Political economic explanation of isothermal compression

Physics Economy
The isothermal insulator does not pass pressure‫݌‬
The walls of the vessel are rigid,
There is a pressure insulator. Free movement of labour-
and the piston is fixed with
power across the borders of a small state is prohibited.
clamps.
The pressure in the thermostat The fundamental constants of value of the small market-
and inside the vessel does not state and the world market do not equalize. They do not
equalize. affect each other.
The isothermal insulator passes the temperature (price) ߠ
The free movement of commodities and money from the
The walls of the vessel and piston
local market to the world market and vice versa is al-
are thin.
lowed.
The temperature in the vessel and
Prices on the local and world markets are equalized.
the thermostat are equalized.
Free movement of traders with the money from the sale is allowed.
A local trader sells commodities in the world market and brings money home to the local
market. This money starts to press on the local market.
A trader from the world market can bring the commodity and sell it in the local market, but he
takes the money home to the thermostat. The withdrawal of this money from circulation in the
local market affects the market.
 107
107


What external forces did the work of compression during isothermal compression in physics?
We compressed the vessel. It means that the external forces are also us. We are a volume reductor.
Thus, we have three objects: a thermostat, a thermodynamic system, and a volume reductor. We
have done our work by compressing the gas.
ܸଶ
‫ ܣ‬ൌ ߥܴߠ‫ ݊ܮ‬൬ ൰ ൏ 0
ܸଵ
Our energy was transferred to the gas, and then it completely went into the thermostat through the
walls, since Q ൌ A.
Description of isothermal compression in political economy.
Our thermodynamic system is surrounded by a pressure isolator. Therefore, the transition of labour-
power to a thermostat, to the world market is prohibited. Consequently, the quantity of labour can-
not decrease due to the emigration of workers abroad.
The total quantity of labour in the isothermal market can decrease only for internal reasons. What
are these reasons? For instance, it is forced or involuntary reduction of the working day. But in or-
der for us to apply thermodynamics to political economy, it is necessary that the reduction of the
working day or week occurs slowly and in small parts.
Reasons that can cause a reduction in the total working time:
1) Aging of nationality.
2) Diseases and death, as a result of changes in the state of the habitat.
3) The reduction of coal deposits leads to a decrease in production and a reduction in work-
ers.
What happens to the commodity after the purchase?
If the buyer is not a producer, then after the purchase he consumes the commodity. The commodity
disappears. The value contained in the commodity also disappears without a trace.
There is a market with two commodities: leather and boots. How does the small-scale producer
function?

The scheme is as follows: consume ื produce ՜ sell ՜ buy.

1) The first step. The small-scale producer consumes the leather, prepares it for the production
of boots. The leather is gone. The value contained in the leather also disappears.
2) The second step. The small-scale producer creates the boots. He creates new value.
3) The third step. The small-scale producer sells the boots. He exchanges value for money val-
ue.
4) The fourth step. The small-scale producer buys leather. He exchanges the money value for
the value contained in the leather.

Conclusion.
1) If the consumer is not a producer, then he completely consumes the commodity. Both the
commodity and the value contained in the commodity disappear.
2) If the buyer is a small-scale producer, then a small-scale producer is a buyer-producer. He
also consumes the purchased commodity. It also destroys the value of the purchased com-
modity.
3) But then he creates a new value.
108 108

Question. The consumer has consumed the commodity and the value has disappeared. Does this
mean that the commodity-molecule has disappeared and there is no model of an ideal gas?
Answer. The producer produced a new commodity with the same value (in the small-scale market
model) with money from the consumer.
So, we can assume that the consumer is the walls of the vessel, and that he does not absorb the
commodity, but the commodity-molecule hit it and bounced off.

We need to show that the ideal gas law correctly reflects the functioning of the market.
What happens in a crisis?
The quantity of labour or labour value ܸdecreases. ܸ݀ ൏ 0

‫ ܸ݌‬ൌ ܰ݇ߠ
ܷ ൌ ܰ݇ߠ ‫ ܸ݀݌‬൅ ܸ݀‫ ݌‬ൌ ܰ݇݀ߠ
ተ ֜ฬ 
ߜ‫ ܣ‬ൌ ‫ܸ݀݌‬ ߜܳ ൌ ܰ݇݀ߠ ൅ ‫ܸ݀݌‬
ߜܳ ൌ ܷ݀ ൅ ߜ‫ܣ‬

Can the price fall? If it cannot and ݀ߠ ൏ 0. We have:

ܸ݀ ൏ 0
ฬ ֚ ߜܳ ൏ 0.
ߜܳ ൌ ܰ݇݀ߠ ൅ ‫ܸ݀݌‬

But if the price falls, it becomes less than the world price.
1) Foreign consumers will buy commodities on the local market, not on the world one. And
they will leave the money in the local market. The commodities and their values will be ir-
revocably destroyed. Commodities-molecules are removed from the market, and money-
molecules take their places.
2) Foreign traders will buy commodities on the local market and sell them on the world market.
They will leave money in the local market. They will profit from the thermostat. This profit
has nothing to do with the local market. Here everything is similar to point 1.
3) Foreign producers will buy leather at the local market. They will create boots from them in
the thermostat.
4) Local producers will take out their commodities, sell them on the world market and bring
the money home.
5) Local traders will buy commodities on the local market, and sell them on the world market.
They will leave the money at the local market. They will profit from the thermostat. They
will also bring their profits home to the local market.
6) Local consumers will act as usual.

Conclusion. In all cases ߜܳ ൐ 0. It is a contradiction.

Can the price increase? For instance, ݀ߠ ൐ 0.
Lemma. An increase in the price causes an automatic increase in the fundamental constant of value
of a man. There is the proof.

‫ ܸ݌‬ൌ ܰ݇ߠ ֜ ‫ ܸ݀݌‬൅ ܸ݀‫ ݌‬ൌ ܰ݇݀ߠ

ฬ ֜ ܸ݀‫ ݌‬ൌ ܰ݇݀ߠ െ ‫ ܸ݀݌‬൐ 0 ֜ ݀‫ ݌‬൐ 0
ܸ݀ ൏ 0 ֜ ‫ ܸ݀݌‬൏ 0
 109
109

If the price of a commodity rises, then it becomes more than the world price. In this case, local trad-
ers buy commodities on the world market and sell them on the local market. They leave money in
the thermostat. They profit from the local market. The commodity mass of the local market is grow-
ing due to the import of foreign commodities into the local market. And the money value of the
market decreases. After all, money is withdrawn from the local market. The price should fall.
Thus, if the price rises at the beginning of the process, then after a while the price will fall. Thus,
the price will fluctuate around the original price.
The ideal gas law is a model with a constant commodity mass. And therefore it cannot express this
phenomenon.
Results. We have shown that the free import of money and commodities creates an isothermal pro-
cess. This means that all the formulas for the isothermal process are correct for such a market.
The fundamental value constant has increased from ‫݌‬ଵ ˇˑ‫݌‬ଶ ൐ ‫݌‬ଵ . The price of the commodities
has also increased. The money value exported from the local market to the thermostat is:
ܸଶ
|‫ |ܣ‬ൌ |ܳ| ൌ ฬܰ݇ߠ‫ ݊ܮ‬൬ ൰ฬ.
ܸଵ
Lemma. The small-scale market creates banks and treasures.
Justification. In an isothermal process excess money can go from the local market to the world mar-
ket. The money of the local market becomes excess money due to the law of value in the form of
the ideal gas equation. For the same reason, thermostat money can go to the local market and stay
there forever.
We can use an accumulator in the form of a heater-refrigerator instead of a thermostat. There are
two accumulators in the economy: treasures and banks. Thus, the possibility of the birth of banks
and treasures has already existed in a small-scale society.

Accumulators Functioning of accumulators

The volume enhancer The thermostat money comes to the local market if nec-
of the labour-power essary
Thermostat -
global market Excess money is not needed by the local market due to
The volume reductor
the law of value, and it leaves the local market and goes
of the labour-power
to the thermostat
The volume enhancer Money from the treasures is transferred to the means of
of the labour-power circulation if necessary.
Treasure
The volume reductor The excess money goes to the accumulator, to the treas-
of the labour-power ure
The volume enhancer Money from banks is transferred to the means of circula-
of the labour-power tion if necessary.
Banks
The volume reductor
The excess money goes to the banks
of the labour-power

The dialectical commodity-money pair is an electron-hole pair

If the commodity leaves the local market and goes into the thermostat, then there is a hole in the
local market. But the money goes from the thermostat to the local market and closes that hole. So
each transition has a chemical potential.
110 110

§ 7.5. Is a physical adiabatic process with a volume accumulator a process in political econo-
my?
Definition. The adiabatic process is a process in which the thermodynamic system is isolated from
the thermostat and the heater, but not isolated from the enhancer (reductor) of the volume (quantity
of labour).
There is the physical adiabatic process. Expansion. The thermodynamic system by external force of
enhancer is transferred from the state ሺpଵ , Vଵ , Ʌଵ ሻ to the state ሺ‫݌‬ଶ , ܸଶ , ߠଶ ሻ. The volume enhancer for-
cibly increases the volume from the value ܸଵ to the value ܸଶ . So, the parameters ሺ‫݌‬ଵ , ܸଵ , ߠଵ , ܸଶ ሻ are
known. So, it is necessary to calculate the system.
Thermodynamic calculation in physics.
The ideal gas law:
‫݌‬ଵ ܸଵ ൌ ܰ݇ߠଵ
ܰ݇ߠ
อ‫݌‬ଶ ܸଶ ൌ ܰ݇ߠଶ  ֜ ‫ ݌‬ൌ
ܸ
‫ ܸ݌‬ൌ ܰ݇ߠ

The change in the internal energy of a gas: ܷ݀ ൌ ܰ݇݀ߠ.

The first law of thermodynamics:
ߜܳ ൌ 0
ߜܳ ൌ ܷ݀ ൅ ߜ‫ܣ‬
ተ ܷ݀ ൌ ܰ݇݀ߠ ֜ െܰ݇݀ߠ ൌ ܰ݇ߠ ܸ݀
ተ ܸ
ܰ݇ߠ
ߜ‫ ܣ‬ൌ ‫ ܸ݀݌‬ൌ ܸ݀
ܸ
We divide the variables:
݀ߠ ܸ݀ ʠ
െ ൌ ֜ߠൌ
ߠ ܸ ܸ
We find the constant ‫ܥ‬:
ʠ
ߠଵ ൌ  ֜ ʠ ൌ ߠଵ ܸଵ
ܸଵ
We get:
ߠଵ ܸଵ
ߠൌ
ܸ
Final temperature:
ߠଵ ܸଵ
ߠଶ ൌ 
ܸଶ
Relation between initial and final temperature:
ߠଶ ܸଵ
ൌ
ߠଵ ܸଶ
We get:
ܰ݇ߠ ‫ߠ ݇ܰܥ‬ଵ ܸଵ ܰ݇
‫݌‬ൌ ൌ ଶ ൌ
ܸ ܸ ܸଶ
Final pressure:
 111
111

ߠଵ ܸଵ ܰ݇
‫݌‬ଶ ൌ
ܸଶ ଶ
Initial pressure:
ܰ݇ߠଵ
‫݌‬ଵ ൌ
ܸଵ
Relation between initial and final pressure:

‫݌‬ଶ ܸଵ ଶ
ൌ൬ ൰
‫݌‬ଵ ܸଶ
Work:
௏మ
ߠଵ ܸଵ ܰ݇ ߠଵ ܸଵ ܰ݇ െ1 1
ߜ‫ ܣ‬ൌ ‫ ܸ݀݌‬ൌ ଶ
ܸ݀ ֜ ȟ‫ ܣ‬ൌ න ଶ
ܸ݀ ൌ ߠଵ ܸଵ ܰ݇ ൬ ൅ ൰
ܸ ܸ ܸଶ ܸଵ
௏భ

ߠଵ ܰ݇ሺܸଶ െ ܸଵ ሻ
ȟ‫ ܣ‬ൌ ൐0
ܸଶ
The internal energy:
ܷ݀ ൌ ܰ݇݀ߠ
ȟܷ ൌ ܰ݇ሺߠଶ െ ߠଵ ሻ
ተ ߠଵ ܸଵ
ߠଶ ൌ 
ܸଶ
ተ ܸଵ െ ܸଶ
ȟܷ ൌ ܰ݇ߠଵ ൏0
ܸଶ

Here we check the correctness of the equation:

ܸଵ െ ܸଶ ߠଵ ܰ݇ሺܸଶ െ ܸଵ ሻ
ȟܳ ൌ ȟܷ ൅ ȟ‫ ܣ‬ൌ ܰ݇ߠଵ ൅ ൌ0
ܸଶ ܸଶ
The second law of thermodynamics:

ߜܳ ൌ 0
อ ߜܳ
݀ܵ ൌ ൌ 0 ֜ ȟܵ ൌ 0
ߠ
Total heat capacity:
ߜܳ ൌ 0
ฬ ֜ʠൌ0
ߜܳ ൌ ʠ݀ߠ

Results of the adiabatic process with a volume enhancer in political economy

The labour value increased according to the con-
ܸ ܸଶ ൐ ܸଵ
dition of the task.
The fundamental constant of human value de- ߠଵ ܸଵ ܰ݇
‫݌‬ creased inversely proportional to the squared la- ‫݌‬ଶ ൌ
bour value. ܸଶ ଶ
The price of a unit of consumer mass of commod- ߠଵ ܸଵ
Ʌ ities decreased. ߠଶ ൌ
ܸଶ
112 112

The total use value of commodities (entropy) did
S ȟܵ ൌ 0
not change.
‫ܥ‬ The total consumer mass (heat capacity) is zero. ‫ܥ‬ൌ0
ܰ The commodity mass is the same.
Thrice abstract value (VALUE) increased. New ߠଵ ܰ݇ሺܸଶ െ ܸଵ ሻ
‫ܣ‬ value was created. ȟ‫ ܣ‬ൌ ൐0
ܸଶ

WHAT DOES MARX MEAN WHEN HE TALKS ABOUT “DEAD CAPITAL”?

Marx means BOUND ENERGY. The bound energy is that part of the internal energy that cannot be
converted into real work under these conditions.
 113
113

Chapter VIII. Capitalist firm is a HEAT ENGINE operating on Carnot CYCLE

§ 8.1. Assumptions for the realization of the Carnot cycle in the Marx’s CAPITAL

Assumptions. An ideal equilibrium world market is considered:

ሺ‫݌‬, ܼ, ܸሻ; ‫ ݌‬ൌ ܼ/ܸ.

We designate such a market as a market under normal conditions, or a normal market. In this case,
it is possible to calculate the fundamental constant of value within small limits; a separate letter is
necessary to denote it, the same we denoted gravitational acceleration with the letter g, and it is
equal to 9.81 m/s2.

We denote this constant with ‫݌‬୬ and call it NORMAL FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANT OF
VALUE. This constant of value of the world market is analogous to atmospheric pressure every-
where on the Earth. Then, the world market under normal conditions is ሺ‫݌‬௡ , ܼ, ܸሻ.
However, the weather is constantly changing on the Earth, and there can be low-pressure or high-
pressure areas in certain locations. It is the same on the world market. During an economic storm,
some regions are able to set local constants of value (higher or lower than the normal fundamental
constant). The market molecule is PROLETARIUM.

The duality theory between people and commodities

‫ ܸ݌‬ൌ ܰ݇ߠ
‫ܸ݌‬ ܰߠ
Labour value of people Money value of commodities

ܸ ൌ ܸଵ ൅ ܸଶ … ൅ ܸெିଵ ൅ ܸெ ሺߠଵ ൅ ߠଶ … ൅ ߠேିଵ ൅ ߠே ሻ

"ܰ" is number of COMMODI-
"‫"ܯ‬is number of PEOPLE!
TIES!
This duality always occurs!

Theorem.
1. The capitalist enterprise is a political economic HEAT ENGINE.
2. This political economic heat engine operates ON THE REVERSED CARNOT CYCLE, i.e, it is
a HEAT PUMP.
3. The capitalist produces HEAT using this engine, i.e, MONEY VALUE. It converts the (working)
TIME OF PEOPLE into money value.
4. All parameters of the Carnot cycle are uniquely determined by the Marx’s formulas.

5. Marx’s equations and Carnot’s equations are the same equations.

The capitalist enterprise goal is production of the MONEY VALUE. Heat, i.e. Q variable is MON-
EY VALUE.
KARL MARX’S EQUATIONS
According to Marx, the value of a capitalistically produced product is separated into three parts:
114 114

ࡽ૚ ൌ ࢉ ൅ ࢜ ൅ ࢓
where ࢉ is constant capital, ࢜ is variable capital,࢓is surplus value.
We denoted all the produced value in gold with ࡽ૚ .
Note. The market volume in hours is denoted with a capital letter V; according to Marx, variable
capital is denoted with a small letter ࢜. This can lead to confusion. We will not change the nota-
tions, but write a small letter ࢜ in italics.
Assumption 1. The molecules are the proletarians.
The number of workers is constant throughout the entire process and equal to N.
Assumption 2. The gold fundamental constant of value (pressure pn) is the same both for things and
proletarians.
Assumption 3. All calculations are performed for one day, i.e., the capitalist hires a proletarian for
one day.

Political economic gas has the following characteristics

Let us assume that pn=5 gram of gold/labour hour
Avogadro’s number for market gas, i.e., there is only one commodity
ܰ஺ =1
in one mole of gas.
ܿ௏ ൌ 1 Molar heat at constant volume
ܿ௣ ൌ 2 Molar heat at constant pressure

ܴൌ1 Molar gas constant for political economic gas

ܿ௣
ߛൌ ൌ 2, ‫ ܸ݌‬ଶ ൌ ܿ‫ݐݏ݊݋‬ Adiabatic equation
ܿ௏

݇ൌ1 Boltzmann constant is equal to 1 and non-dimensional

§ 8.2. Developing the Carnot CYCLE using Marx’s formulas

WE DETERMINE THE VERTEX ‫ ܣ‬OF THE CARNOT CYCLE

The vertices are numbered from 0 to 3.
Step 1. We determine the upper temperature (upper value of labour power) of the Carnot cycle
െߠଵ .
At the market, a capitalist buys ܰproletarians for 1 day at the sum of ‫ ݒ‬grams of gold, at the price
௩
of ߠଵ . From there, ‫ ݒ‬ൌ ܰ݇ߠଵ , i.e. ߠଵ ൌ .
ே௞
Step 2. We determine the lower volume value െܸ଴ from the equation ࢜ ൌ ‫݌‬௡ ܸ଴ .
௩
The equation becomes: ܸ଴ ൌ . As a result, there are equalities: ‫ ݒ‬ൌ ‫݌‬௡ ܸ଴ ൌ ܰ݇ߠଵ .
௣೙

CONCLUSION
௚௥௔௠௢௙௚௢௟ௗ
We recall that pressure‫݌‬௡ ൌ ૞ is the universal gold fundamental constant of value of
௟௔௕௢௨௥௛௢௨௥
the world market, i.e. of the thermostat. On this market-thermostat, we define and research the mid-
 115
115

dle market. We equate pressure‫݌‬଴ with the universal gold constant of value on a figure of the Car-
not cycle below:
௚௥௔௠௢௙௚௢௟ௗ
‫݌‬௡ ൌ 5 , i.e.:‫݌‬௡ ൌ ‫݌‬଴ . This means that we determined the vertex ‫ܣ‬ሺܸ଴ , ‫݌‬଴ ሻof the Car-
௟௔௕௢௨௥௛௢௨௥
not cycle.
THE MAIN PROBLEM
The proletarian is a dual creature. In one respect, he is a commodity (labour power) on the market,
in another – he is a WORKER-PRODUCER.
Consequence. The proletarian in the political economic ideal gas law formula must appear twice:
once on the left, once on the right. But it is not known if the numbers ‫ ܯ‬and ܰ are equal. After all,
the proletarian as a commodity is not equal to the proletarian as a worker! Moreover, the number of
proletarians as commodities may not coincide with the number of the same proletarians, but consid-
ered as workers.
Lemma. If one vertex of the Carnot cycle is given, then all the others are uniquely determined by
the Marx’s equation:ܳଵ ൌ ܿ ൅ ‫ ݒ‬൅ ݉.
There is a picture found on the Web that shows the operating principle of the heat pump. Let us
change the direction of the arrows. The Carnot cycle consists of two isotherms and two adiabats.
The heat pump operates on the reversed Carnot cycle, i.e., counterclockwise.

The Carnot cycle equations:

௏భ
ܿ ൅ ‫ ݒ‬൅ ݉ ൌ ܳଵ ൌ ܰ݇ߠଵ ‫݊ܮ‬
௏బ
In isothermal
ܸଶ processes
ܿ ൅ ‫ ݒ‬ൌ ܳଶ ൌ ܰ݇ߠଶ ‫݊ܮ‬
ܸଷ
ܸଵ ܸଶ
ൌ
ܸ଴ ܸଷ
For an adiabatic
ߠଵ ܸ଴ ൌ ߠଶ ܸଷ process

ߠଵ ܸଵ ൌ ߠଶ ܸଶ

Step 3. We determine the lower temperature (lower value of labour power) of the Carnot cycle
െߠଶ . Dividing one equality by another, we obtain:
116 116

ߠଶ ܿ൅‫ݒ‬ ܿ൅‫ݒ‬
ൌ  ֜ ߠଶ ൌ ߠ , ߠ ൏ ߠଵ .
ߠଵ ܿ ൅ ‫ ݒ‬൅ ݉ ܿ൅‫ݒ‬൅݉ ଵ ଶ

Step 4. We determine the volume ܸଵ (in hours). Variable ܸଵ can be uniquely found from the equa-
tions:
ܸଵ ܸଵ ܸଵ ܿ ൅ ‫ ݒ‬൅ ݉
ܿ ൅ ‫ ݒ‬൅ ݉ ൌ ܳଵ ൌ ܰ݇ߠଵ ‫݊ܮ‬ ൌ ‫ ݊ܮ ֜  ݊ܮݒ‬ൌ , ܸଵ ൐ ܸ଴ .
ܸ଴ ܸ଴ ܸ଴ ‫ݒ‬

Step 5. We determine the pressure, i.e. the new gold fundamental constant, from the equation:
‫ݒ‬
‫݌‬ଵ ܸଵ ൌ ܰ݇ߠଵ ൌ ‫݌  ֜ ݒ‬ଵ ൌ .
ܸଵ
Upon performing steps 4 and 5, we have uniquely determined the vertex ‫ ܤ‬of the Carnot cycle.
Step 6. We determine the vertex ‫ ܥ‬of the Carnot cycle.
We defined two upper vertices and isotherm temperatures. It means that the isotherm graphs are
built. But only one adiabat can pass through one point. On that basis, two lower vertices are also
uniquely determined. After all, let us calculate these vertices using the adiabatic process equation:
ߠଵ ܿ൅‫ݒ‬൅݉
ߠଵ ܸଵ ൌ ߠଶ ܸଶ ֜ ܸଶ ൌ ܸଵ ൌ , ܸଶ ൐ ܸଵ .
ߠଶ ܿ൅‫ݒ‬
We determine the pressure from the adiabatic equation:
‫݌‬ଶ ܸଵଶ ߠଶଶ ܿ൅‫ݒ‬ ଶ
‫݌‬ଵ ܸଵଶ ൌ ‫݌‬ଶ ܸଶଶ  ֜  ൌ ଶൌ ଶൌ൬ ൰ , ‫݌‬ଶ ൏ ‫݌‬ଵ .
‫݌‬ଵ ܸଶ ߠଵ ܿ൅‫ݒ‬൅݉

Step 7. We determine the vertex D of the Carnot cycle. We obtain:

ߠଵ ܿ൅‫ݒ‬൅݉ ‫ݒ‬
ߠଵ ܸ଴ ൌ ߠଶ ܸଷ  ֜  ܸଷ ൌ ܸ଴ ൌ , ܸ ൐ ܸ଴ .
ߠଶ ܿ ൅ ‫݌ ݒ‬௡ ଷ
The second method:
ܸଵ ܸଶ ܸ଴
 ൌ ֜ ܸଷ ൌ ܸଶ ֜  Vଷ ൏ Vଶ .
ܸ଴ ܸଷ ܸଵ

Using the isotherm equation, we obtain:

ܸଶ ܸଵ
‫݌‬ଷ ܸଷ ൌ ‫݌‬ଶ ܸଶ ฺ ‫݌‬ଷ ൌ ‫݌‬ଶ ൌ ‫ ݌‬.
ܸଷ ܸ଴
As a result, the parameter ‫݌‬ଷ is also determined. To conclude, the Carnot cycle can be uniquely re-
produced using Karl Marx’s equations.
Step 8. Derivation of the formula for Marx’s profit rate from the Carnot cycle formulas. We have:

ߠଶ ܿ൅‫ݒ‬ ߠଵ ܿ ൅ ‫ ݒ‬൅ ݉ ݉ ߠଵ ݉
 ൌ ฺ ൌ ൌ1൅ ฺ െ 1 ൌ .
ߠଵ ܿ ൅ ‫ ݒ‬൅ ݉ ߠଶ ܿ൅‫ݒ‬ ܿ൅‫ݒ‬ ߠଶ ܿ൅‫ݒ‬

CONCLUSIONS
Theorem. The profit rate of a capitalist enterprise, calculated using the Carnot cycle, is:
 117
117

ܶଵ െ ܶଶ ݉
ߠൌ ൌ .
ܶଶ ܿ൅‫ݒ‬

Theorem. Thermal efficiency – the efficiency of the Carnot cycle and the Marx’s profit rate are the
same formula.

§ 8.3. The difference between political economy and physics

Everyone is trying to stress the point that political economy and physics have much in common. But
one should do the opposite. It is necessary to tell the difference between these sciences, so that we
make new discoveries basing on them.
DIFFERENCE ʋ1
The variable capital ‫ ݒ‬is involved in the Carnot cycletwice. The first time we use it to determine the
1st vertex of the Carnot cycle – vertex ‫ܣ‬ሺܸ଴ , ‫݌‬଴ ሻ. Area of the rectangle ܱܲ଴ ‫ܸܣ‬଴ is equal to the varia-
ble capital ‫ݒ‬. The 2nd time we use variable capital in the value ܳଶ ൌ ܿ ൅ ‫ݒ‬, that is, purely geometri-
cally variable capital enters the area of the curvilinear trapezoid ܸଷ ‫ܸܥܦ‬ଶ .
It is not good. But it is what it is. Up to this point, it appeared that one variable corresponds to each
area, i.g. three categories ܿ, ‫ݒ‬, ݉ can be located at three different areas. Failed.
DIFFERENCE ʋ2
We have constructed a political economic engine that operates on the reversed Carnot cycle, but
there are only two of engines: a heat pump and a refrigeration machine. All of a sudden, it turns out
that the constructed political economic engine is an unknown third type. Both the heat pump and the
refrigeration machine are the same heat engine, but their goals are different. In view of this, their
design and efficiency coefficient are different too.

The left picture was taken from the remarkable book written by I.M. Chukhin; the right picture was
found in the book written by an anonymous author.
118 118

TYPES OF MACHINES operating on the reversed CARNOT cycle
d) Marx’s political economic machine is capi-
b) Refrigerator ɫ) Heat pump
talist enterprise
GOALS ARE DIFFERENT
Exhaust as much heat as Transfer as much en- Make as much profit as possible, i.e., the
possible‫ݍ‬ଶ ergy as possible‫ݍ‬ଵ variable݉ ൌ ܳଵ െ ܳଶ ൌ ‫ܣ‬
The most expensive resource in limited quantities
? ? Initial capitalܳଶ ൌ ܿ ൅ ‫ݒ‬
The cheapest resource in almost unlimited quantities.
They are different.
Low-grade exhaust heat‫ݍ‬ଶ . The Surplus value, i.e., variable ݉ ൌ ܳଵ െ
Heat ‫ݍ‬ଵ
larger this value, the better. ܳଶ ൌ ‫ܣ‬
Efficiency ratios. They are different.
ߠଶ ‫ݍ‬ଶ ‫ݍ‬ଶ ߠଵ ‫ݍ‬ଵ ‫ݍ‬ଵ ‫ܣ‬ ܳଵ െ ܳଶ ߠଵ െ ߠଶ ݉
ൌ ൌ ൌ ൌ ൌ ൌ ൌ
ߠଵ െ ߠଶ ‫ݍ‬ଵ െ ‫ݍ‬ଶ ‫ܣ‬ ߠଵ െ ߠଶ ‫ݍ‬ଵ െ ‫ݍ‬ଶ ‫ܣ‬ ܳଶ ܳଶ ߠଶ ‫ݒ‬൅ܿ
CONCLUSION. All three types of machines have different efficiency ratios, cheap and expen-
sive resources; this is why they are different from each other in terms of construction. This
means that the Marx’s political economic machine is a new type of machine operating on the
reversed Carnot cycle. Therefore, the term “Karl Marx’s heat engine” has a right to exist.

§ 8.4. Is it possible to construct Marx’s mechanical HEAT ENGINE?

௠
Marx defined the rate of exploitation as the value . It is limited both by 24 hours a day and the
࢜
class struggle. In the authors’ opinion, it is possible to construct Marx’s mechanical machine.
In heat engines, what is transferred and what is reproduced?
In thermodynamics In political economy
Heat ܳଶ is transferred by the heat Marx. Constant capital is transferred
pump Marx. Variable capital࢜ is reproduced
In both sciences there is a word «TRANSFERRED». It keeps up spirit.

CRITICISM OF THE CONSTRUCTED POLITICAL ECONOMIC MACHINE

௠
Theorem. Marx’s rate of exploitation is value that is a fundamental constant of every country.
࢜
From there, we have three fundamental constants: fundamental constant of value, rate of profit, rate
of exploitation:
݉ ݉
‫݌‬, , .
ܿ൅‫ݒ ݒ‬
The capitalist production goal is:
௠
1) maximizing the rate of profit ;
௖ା௩
௠
2) or maximizing the rate of surplus value ;
௩
3) or maximizing surplus value݉.
 119
119

All three parameters cannot be maximized simultaneously. If we maximize one parameter, other
parameters may decrease.
Possible optimization options are as follows:
Option 1. We designate one of the parameters as the main one, e.g., the rate of profit is the main
parameter. We maximize it and do not pay attention to the decrease of other parameters.
Option 2. We consider all three parameters to be the main ones. We optimize them using Pareto ef-
ficiency. In that case, it is necessary to prove that Pareto efficiency has political economic sense.
Option 3. One of the parameters is designated as a fundamental constant, e.g., the rate of profit is
the fundamental constant. So, we maximize profit under the stipulation that the rate of profit is con-
stant.
But what if the firm’s rate of profit has decreased? Then the capitalist reduces production until the
rate of profit becomes equal to the market average. There are other optimization options, but the
principle of determinism says that there is only one truth.

DISCUSSION OF THE POLITICAL ECONOMIC CARNOT CYCLE

All concepts and variables of the Carnot cycle must have a political economic sense. If even one of
the variables does not meet this condition, then the political economic Carnot cycle would be for
nothing, even if all the formulas are plausible.
OBJECTIVE: JOIN TWO MARKETS TOGETHER. Question. What commodity price will be set
when two previously isolated markets are combined into one united market?
So, there are isolated markets: ‫݌‬ଵ ܸଵ ൌ ܰଵ ݇ߠଵ , ‫݌‬ଶ ܸଶ ൌ ܰଶ ݇ߠଶ . We recall that ߠଵ, ߠଶ are prices of the
same commodity in grams of gold, ܰଵ, ܰଶ are quantity of this commodity, ܲଵ , ܲଶ are fundamental
constants of value in these two markets. Adding and transforming the equations, we get:
‫݌‬ଵ ܸଵ ൅ ‫݌‬ଶ ܸଶ ܰଵ ݇ߠଵ ൅ ܰଶ ݇ߠଶ
‫݌‬ଵ ܸଵ ൅ ‫݌‬ଶ ܸଶ ൌ ܰଵ ݇ߠଵ ൅ ܰଶ ݇ߠଶ , ሺܸଵ ൅ ܸଶ ሻ ൌ ሺܰଵ ൅ ܰଶ ሻ.
ܸଵ ൅ ܸଶ ܰଵ ൅ ܰଶ

We introduce new notations for the united market (No. 3) and get:

‫݌‬ଵ ܸଵ ൅ ‫݌‬ଶ ܸଶ ܰଵ ݇ߠଵ ൅ ܰଶ ݇ߠଶ

‫݌‬ଷ ܸଷ ൌ ܰଷ ݇ߠଷ , ‫݌‬ଷ ൌ , ܸଷ ൌ ܸଵ ൅ ܸଶ , ߠଷ ൌ , ܰଷ ൌ ܰଵ ൅ ܰଶ .
ܸଵ ൅ ܸଶ ܰଵ ൅ ܰଶ

We formally derived the unified market equation, without reference to Dalton’s law. It is easier.
CONCLUSION
1) The commodity price on the united market is:
ܰଵ ݇ߠଵ ൅ ܰଶ ݇ߠଶ
ߠଷ ൌ .
ܰଵ ൅ ܰଶ

Conclusion. The commodity price depends on the quantity of the commodities.

2) The new fundamental constant of value is:
‫݌‬ଵ ܸଵ ൅ ‫݌‬ଶ ܸଶ
‫݌‬ଷ ൌ .
ܸଵ ൅ ܸଶ
Conclusion. The fundamental constant of value depends on labour value – volume of labour time ܸ.
120 120


WHEN “AVERAGE”, “MONEY”, AND “TEMPERATURE” CONCEPTS WILL DISAPPEAR?

There are two equilibrium markets. We put them together. It takes time for the united market to
come to equilibrium after many random fluctuations. As long as there are fluctuations, there is no
fundamental constant of value and price. This means that there is no “MONEY” category. The old
“MONEY” category have disappeared, the new one has not been born. As a result, joining markets
together restarts the ENTIRE MONEY EVOLUTION. And this evolution starts again from nothing,
with a commodity.
A substantial example of joining two markets together
Imputation for the year Market No. 1 Market No. 2
Leading market Backward market
Conventional name of the markets America Ethiopia
The same number of workers 100.000 workers 100.000 workers
Wheat produced 100 million tons 10 million tons
The same labour hours 8 hours
Working days per year 250 days
Labour hours per year 250*8=2000 hours
World market price 200 dollars per ton
Gold price per gram 40 dollars per gram
Price of a ton of wheat in gold 200/40= 5 gram per ton
Fundamental constants of value
଼ gramofgold
5 ‫ כ‬10 gramofgold
‫݌‬ଵ ൌ ହ  ൌ 2.5  ‫݌‬ଶ ൌ 0.25
10 ‫ כ‬2000 labourhour labourhour
UNITED MARKET: Market No.1 ‫ ڂ‬Market No.2
It is a new state America + Ethiopia
The fundamental constant of the united market is:
5 ‫ כ‬ሺ10଼ ൅ 10଻ ሻ gramofgold
‫݌‬ଷ ൌ ହ
ൌ 1.375 
2 ‫ כ‬10 ‫ כ‬2000 labourhour

The united market is a new America-Ethiopia state with common laws. If there is no unified state,
then there is no united market. Fundamental constant of the united market ‫݌‬ଷ regulates the market
in the new country of America-Ethiopia.
There is no world money yet, they were not born. World money will be born only when the whole
world is united into one state.
What is the difference between advanced capitalism and a society of small-scale producers?
Answer. The society of small-scale producers is the ideal political economic gas. It is governed by
one fundamental constant, the value constant.
The economy of advanced capitalism is more complex. There are two fundamental constants: the
value constant and the rate of profit.
 121
121

§ 8.5. The theory of thing VALUE fetishism No.1 and the fundamental constant of value

The fundamental constant of value of the united market is as follows:

americanbreadሺ100ሻ ൅ ethiopianbreadሺ10ሻingoldprices
‫݌‬ଷ ൌ ൌ
ሺ100000Americans ൅ 100000Ethiopiansሻ2000

INEQUALITY
ൌ
EQUALITY
There is the communist formula of the equality of men in the denominator:
100000Americans ൅ 100000Ethiopians ൌ 200000people
There is also inequality between Americans and Ethiopians expressed in the numerator. One Amer-
ican produces as much bread as ten Ethiopians.
THE FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANT OF VALUE is the result of resolving the CONTRADIC-
TION between the capitalist principle of INEQUALITY and the communist principle of EQUALI-
TY.
And where do things stand regarding unfortunate economist-physicists from the bourgeoisie? The
idea of inequality is deep in heads of all bourgeois theoreticians. That is why they are indignant
with the communist formula:
100000Americans ൅ 100000Ethiopians ൌ 200000people
They say, “What are you doing, man? One unfortunate Ethiopian is not to be compared with the
great American! Who is he and who is American! No way! In mathematics, 1+1=2. But political
economy does not work in this way. One American is worth 10 Ethiopians and therefore: 1 Ameri-
can + 10 Ethiopians = 2 Americans”. In other words, they use INEQUALITY TWICE!
On the contrary, they believe that the idea of EQUALITY is expressed in the numerator. The idea
of domination of equality on the market sinks into their mind. So, all bourgeois theoreticians use the
୍୒୉୕୙୅୐୍୘ଢ଼
formula: . They count inequality twice.
୍୒୉୕୙୅୐୍୘ଢ଼

Through this example we see that Marx’s law of pair inversion is correct. A thing fetishist considers
equality to be inequality, and inequality to be equality!
For bourgeois economist-physicists, the fundamental constant of the united market is:

americanbreadሺ100ሻ ൅ ethiopianbreadሺ10ሻingoldprices
‫݌‬ൌ ൌ 2.295
100000Ethiopians
ሺ100000Americans ൅ ሻ2000
10
As we can see, the fundamental constant of economist-physicists is overestimated and incorrect.
This means that all the scientific works of bourgeois economist-physicists are misleading.
Theorem. The political economy fetish lens is an optical lens. It is not able to turn over some imag-
es without turning over others. It turns over 100% of the images.
Consequence. Among thousands of works of bourgeois economist-physicists, it is impossible to
find one true work.
122 122

§ 8.6. Small-scale producer is an oscillator
Quantity of labour ܸ is the phase variable. We assume that a small-scale producer works eight
hours a day, and we choose a new letter ‫ݔ‬ሺ‫ݐ‬ሻ, then the oscillation period of the small-scale producer
ଶగ
is ܶ ൌ 8hours. The circular frequency is equal to ൌ . The equation of small-scale producer’s os-
்
cillations is:
‫ݔ‬ሺ‫ݐ‬ሻ ൌ ܰ݇‫݊݅ݏ‬ሺ߱‫ݐ‬ሻ

Discussion. The circular process is as follows: small-scale producer can

PRODUCEĺSELLĺBUYĺCONSUME
and then he returns to zero. According to given phase and direction of the velocity vector, we can
unambiguously reconstruct what a person is doing now.
Example. If ‫ ݔ‬ൌ  െ4, ‫ ݔ‬ᇱ ൐ 0 at some point in time, then the small-scale producer has begun to con-
sume the purchased commodity and has already consumed half of the purchased commodity. In this
way, negative coordinates can be introduced into political economy.
The second version of the oscillator is as follows:
࢞ሺ࢚ሻ ൌ ࢂ࢙࢏࢔ሺ࣓࢚ሻ
Theorem. The rate of consumption and the rate of production across the country are equal in modu-
lus.
Proof. If the rate of production were systematically higher than the rate of consumption, then there
would be an overstocking, and if it were less, then there would be a famine on a social scale. Con-
sumption is understood as the consumption of leather purchased on the market by a shoemaker.
This theorem allows introducing negative numbers and a coordinate system.
Why did we introduce negative numbers and a coordinate system?
We want to repeat Maxwell’s path. He introduced a normal velocity distribution. Maxwell derived
the energy distribution and the ideal gas law from the normal distribution. We would like to do the
same.

§ 8.7. The main curse of political economy: TIME is MULTIDIMENSIONAL

Hegel said: “To appropriate a person’s labour time means to appropriate his ESSENCE”.
According to Hegel the capitalist appropriates the labour time of the proletarian. Hegel identifies a
PERSON with his LABOUR TIME. According to Hegel, the capitalist also takes the soul of the
proletarian. But person is a very complex being. So a person’s TIME is also a very complex catego-
ry. Therefore, this is the main curse of political economy: Time is multidimensional.
 123
123

Perhaps, a small-scale producer is not one single oscillator, but two?
Can a quantum model of Marx’s CAPITAL be created?
Is it possible to create a mathematical model of the political economy of communism? Is it possible
to make a model of a man of communism? Yes, it is.
Engels: “MAN is an ELECTRON OF COMMUNISM”. The political economy of communism will
be quantum. A man is to be modeled by an electron in this model. In the books by the authors, the
initial stage of such a model is made.
There is a natural quantization in economics. Coins with the face value of less than one cent do not
make economic sense. The production expenditures of small coins are greater than the economic
effect of using them. The value of such a coin is the new Schrödinger constant.
124 124

Chapter IX. Formalization of Marx’s CAPITAL with the help of MATHEMATIZED HE-
GEL’S DIALECTICS

§ 9.1. The logical (Hegelian) scheme of the origin of money discovered by Marx.
Dialectical pair:

Hegel’s evolutionary theorem.

Theorem. The origin of a category outside the TRIAD is impossible. Any category goes through the
TRIAD way.
Marx is a logician and he discovered the LOGICAL EVOLUTION of CATEGORY “MONEY”
(NOT MONEY itself).
Although the LOGICAL is the ESSENCE of the HISTORICAL, these categories may not coincide.
The LOGICAL TIME may not coincide with the historical time. Moreover, the logical time can be
perpendicular to the historical time.
There are still tribes living on the planet that are in a primitive state. But Hegel and Marx are not
interested in them. The categories of Hegel and Marx have their own evolution – it is the logical
evolution of social categories. The history of the origin of real money is studied by historians. And
Marx is not a historian, he is a logician.
In this paragraph, we intend to show drawings of dialectical pairs and place in them all the catego-
ries of the logical evolution of Marx’s logical-money categories.

In the course of the Hegelian logical evolution of categories, real VALUE and its shell GOLD-
THING are born. We get:
 125
125


The Marx’s evolution of money has already been completed in equilibrium situations. The MONEY
category has already been born and grown. Therefore, there is no need to consider the Marx’s evo-
lution of money in equilibrium systems. The old money dies and a new evolution of new money
begins in transition processes. Therefore, it is possible to use the presented evolution of Marx’s
money categories in transitional processes. But it is not necessary to add it into the calculation
schemes. This is a methodological theorem.
We know that Marx’s political economy is the science of the money man, the science of the Ameri-
can. So Marx models the feelings of a money man. We have:
firstsmale െ scaleproducer ᇱ sfeelings:ሺ݃‫݀݁݁ݎ‬ଵ , ݈݃‫ݕ݊݋ݐݐݑ‬ଵ ሻ
൤
secondsmale െ scaleproducer ᇱ sfeelings:ሺ݃‫݀݁݁ݎ‬ଶ , ݈݃‫ݕ݊݋ݐݐݑ‬ଶ ሻ
Marx is primarily interested in VALUE. Therefore, Marx uses only two feelings of the money man
in his scheme:
ሺ݃‫݀݁݁ݎ‬ଵ , ݃‫݀݁݁ݎ‬ଶ ሻ
And this is the right decision, because the evolution of money is the evolution of greed. The birth of
the USE VALUE category is described by the evolution of the pair:
ሺ݈݃‫ݕ݊݋ݐݐݑ‬ଵ , ݈݃‫ݕ݊݋ݐݐݑ‬ଶ ሻ
And now every reader is able to draw Hegel’s evolutionary triad for the use value category.
Is it possible to put all the categories of Marx’s Capital in one huge binary graph? Will all Marx’s
theorems be easily deduced from this graph?

‫ܧ‬ ‫ܯ‬ ‫ܦ‬

Embryonic dialectics Metaphysics Dialectics
Categories
‫ܣ‬ா , ‫ܤ‬ா െembryonic ‫ܣ‬ெ , ‫ܤ‬ெ െmetaphysical ‫ܣ‬஽ , ‫ܤ‬஽ െdialectical
Vague categories, like Rigid, immutable categories Flexible. They are constantly chang-
clouds in the sky ing into each other: ‫ܣ‬஽ ՜ ‫ܤ‬஽ , ‫ܤ‬஽  ՜
‫ܣ‬஽
Karl Marx’s law of pair inversion
A pair is inverted:
1. The first time during the transition from the embryonic world to the metaphysical world;
2. The second time during the transition from the metaphysical world to the dialectical world;
3. An infinite number of times in the world of dialectics.
A pair: Woman-Man in political economy (not biology). Hegel’s evolutionary triad
126 126


A tribe is a primitive Capitalism Communism is a global tribe

sexual commune
The contradictions The contradictions between men and women
between men and are not class-based; they are dialectical.
women are class- Dialectical contradictions are resolved in two
based. ways: with the help of non-class struggle and
with the help of love.
There are endless dialectical transitions under communism:
‫ ݊ܽ݉݋ݓ‬՜ ݉ܽ݊, ݉ܽ݊ ՜ ‫݊ܽ݉݋ݓ‬.
Here are descriptions of these transitions from point of view of psychology (not in political econ-
omy):
1) The women of communism become strong as men. They are in no way inferior to men. It is a
‫ ݊ܽ݉݋ݓ‬՜ ݉ܽ݊ transition.
2) The woman of communism says: “My man is gentle as a girl in bed”. It is ݉ܽ݊ ՜ ‫݊ܽ݉݋ݓ‬
transition. Under communism, the transitions‫ ݊ܽ݉݋ݓ‬՜ ݉ܽ݊, ݉ܽ݊ ՜ ‫ ݊ܽ݉݋ݓ‬are not literal, but
beautiful and imaginative.
The theory of pair degeneration by authors
The authors created a theory of pair degeneration. It answers the question: What will happen to a
metaphysical pair if it does not pass into a dialectical pair in time?
First answer. The pair will begin endless metaphysical transitions (not dialectical). And women
and men will literally pass into each other.
This theory explains huge cases of homosexuality and mass gender transitioning in the United
States. Men cut off their genitals and turn into women, but into degenerate women.
The second answer. The law of time reversal is valid at degeneration. Time is moving “OSTEN-
SIBLY” backwards. Any dialectical pair appears from an egg, by splitting the one. The backward
evolution existing in the USA will lead to the fact that there will be one and only degenerate “IT”
GENDER. This means that the United States rewound 500 million years and people turned into
asexual political economic amoebas.

There is the full exposition of the laws of dialectics in the second book of the authors “Mathema-
tized Hegel’s dialectics”.
Why did Hegel call his dialectics “ABSOLUTE IDEA”?
The answer is that the laws of dialectics have no exceptions. In particular, the evolutionary path, the
path of the triad passes through all categories of mathematics, physics, chemistry and linguistics.
The theory of degeneration is true for all categories of all sciences. The law of inversion is also true
for all sciences.
Therefore, Hegel’s ABSOLUTE IDEA DIALECTICS is the absolute invincible weapon of man-
kind. There is nothing more than this weapon and there will be nothing more. If young people learn
Hegel’s dialectic, then a new world will be built quickly and without civil wars.
Hegel’s dialectics can help to solve problems of physics, mathematics, and chemistry. And com-
munism can be built. Hegel’s dialectics is a universal weapon of mankind.
a man and a woman form a dead metaphysical pair in America and the West:
 127
127


In Russia, a man and a woman form a semi-dialectical, semi-metaphysical pair. This follows from
Lenin’s theory of the duality of socialism. Under communism, man and woman pair would become
a dialectical pair:

§ 9.2 The theory of duality. There are FOUR laws of SUPPLY and FOUR laws of DEMAND
in the eight-dimensional space of categories.

THE DUALITY OF the political economic ideal gas law

ܼ ൌ ‫ܸ݌‬஼ ൌ ܰ݇ߠ
‫ܸ݌‬஼ ܰ݇ߠ
People Commodities
The total political economic value of com-
The total political economic energy of peo-
modities. The sum of the prices of all com-
ple.
modities in gold.
‫ܸ݌‬஼ ൌ ‫ܸ݌‬ଵ ൅ ‫ܸ݌‬ଶ ൅ ‫ ڮ‬൅ ‫ܸ݌‬ெିଵ ൅ ‫ܸ݌‬ெ ݇ߠଵ ൅ ݇ߠଶ ൅ ‫ ڮ‬൅ ݇ߠேିଵ ൅ ݇ߠே
"‫ "ܯ‬is amount of people! "ܰ" is amount of commodities!
SUPPLY DEMAND
Unambiguous definition of the values of the categories DEMAND and SUPPLY
A quantity of labourܸ஼ is the total supply in
LABOUR VALUES. Workers put their la- ܰ݇ value is the market demand in CON-
bour hours up for sale in the form of labour SUMER MASS.
values.
‫ܸ݌‬஼ value is the total SUPPLY in abstract ܰ݇ߠ value is the total demand in abstract
VALUES. values.
There is always a duality between people and commodities!

However, there will be four laws of supply and four laws of demand in the eight-dimensional space
of categories ȳ଼ .
The law of supply No.1. We assume that we sell commodity mass on the market.
‫ܯ‬
൥ܰ
ܸ௧
128 128

This option is described by a thermodynamic system with a variable mass or with a variable number
of molecules.
The law of supply No.2. We assume that we sell thermal mass, the total heat capacity of the market:
‫ܿܯ‬௏
൥ ܰ݇
‫ܥ‬
The law of supply No.3. We assume that we sell the total labour value ܸ஼ .
The law of supply No.4. We assume that we sell the total use value, entropy ܵ.
It is impossible to unambiguously define the laws of supply and the laws of demand. It all depends
on the direction of the transition processes. Here is an example.
Example No.1. There is a barter market (not money market) with no money; money hasn’t been
born yet.
Two small-scale producer barter. The first small-scale producer exchanges the sausage, and the sec-
ond one exchanges sour cream. The sausage as a commodity has two states. The first state is zero.
And the sausage has no use value for the first small-scale producer. He produced it only for sale.
The sausage has a use value only of the buyer.
Consequence. Truth is not absolute. The truth depends on the side from which you look. What
should we do then? We should consider the sausage as a two-dimensional vector and keep track of
both coordinates of this vector.
Lemma. It is impossible to give an absolute and unambiguous definition of the law of SUPPLY and
the law of DEMAND within the ideal gas model.
Lemma. A thermodynamic process is a reversible process if entropy (use value of the process) is
zero.
Consequence. Isothermal and adiabatic processes are reversible.
Lemma. The law of supply and demand can be reversed for reversible processes.
Consequence. Isothermal and adiabatic processes can be interpreted as a demonstration of both the
law of SUPPLY and the law of DEMAND.
The law of supply and the law of demand lose their significance with the ideal gas law. After all,
political economic thermodynamics allows us to answer any question.

§ 9.3. Marx’s CAPITAL is the science of a SIXTEEN-DIMENSIONAL MAN

Where is a man in political economy? What place does a man occupy on the main political econom-
ic graph? The category LABOUR ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ can be identified with a man. But COMMODITY ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ is what a man pro-
duces. Therefore, the category COMMODITY ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ can also be identified with a man. So, the main political
ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ ‫ ׫‬COMMODITY
economic graph LABOUR ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ is the political economic man and the political economy of
Marx is the science of the sixteen-dimensional man.

§ 9.4. The fundamental value constant ࢖ʠ is the soul of a man in a golden shell, in a golden
prison
The main political economy graph is built according to the degree of increasing abstraction:
‫ܯ‬, ‫ܥ‬, ߠ஻ , ‫݌‬஻ , ܸ஼ , ܵ, ܸ஼ , ߠ஼ , ‫݌‬஼
The mass of commodities ‫ ܯ‬is tonnes of wheat or meters of fabric. It is close to hands of a man.
Then we get further from the hands of a man and come to the soul of a man.
 129
129

Definition. The SOUL of a man is PERFECT.
Theorem. The fundamental constant of value ‫݌‬ʠ is the soul of a man in a golden shell, in a golden
prison.
In Russia: “What kind of person are you?”
In America: “How much do you cost?”
You are how much values you have, and what your fundamental constant of value is. A woman of
pleasure costs 30 dollars; it is half a gram of gold. She is nobody in America; she is not even a hu-
man.
But if there is a businessman, he is like a ton of gold. In America, being human means being a piece
of gold.
There is a wonderful Soviet film “Shadow” (1971) with Oleg Dal. This film can help to show the
essence of Marx’s CAPITAL. And those who want to study Marx’s CAPITAL should definitely
watch this film. The idea of the film is taken from Marx.
The plot is as follows: the film tells about the confrontation between a smart and kind scientist and
his shadow. Scientist Christian-Theodore comes to a magical land. He falls in love with the frivo-
lous princess Louise. He asks his shadow to find her. The shadow, leaving its master, deceives him
and becomes a man named Theodore-Christian.
The scientist gets sick. Annuanciata, hotel keeper’s daughter, nurses him. SHADOW-Theodore per-
suades Louise to marry him.
Then SHADOW-Theodore becomes a king. The scientist is arrested and brought to Theodore. He
offers the scientist to become his shadow.
An indignant Christian tries to prove to everyone that the new king is just his own shadow. But they
do not believe him, even when Theodore, obeying the words of the spell, returns to his original ap-
pearance.
When SHADOW-Theodore returns to the human body, he orders the scientist’s head to be cut off,
but he also loses the head.
All the ministers, frightened by the headless ruler, remember the source of living water. Annuanci-
ata revives the scientist.
A frightened shadow asks the scientist to stay. The scientist refuses and leaves the kingdom with his
beloved Annuanciata.

Karl Marx’s theory of commodity-money fetishism

Money was conceived as a human assistance. It helped to make the exchange and develop produc-
tion. Money was intermediary between people. It was an ordinary shell, or simple piece of paper.
But time went on, and money has absorbed the greedy souls of people. It came to life, put on a tail-
coat and became a master. It took everything from people: wives, houses, names, beautiful voices.
And people died. They are lifeless creatures now. They are the living dead. They are a labour pow-
er: a freak with no voice, no name, and no brains. Now dead people are intermediaries between
LIVING MONEY.
Why do not people sing? People do not sing, because MONEY is singing now.
From the “Octopus” movie: “When money sings, the muse is silent”.
130 130

The Muses of ancient Greece.
There were nine Greek Muses in the classical version: Calliope, Melpomene, Clio, Thalia, Euterpe,
Polyhymnia, Erato, Terpsichore, and Urania.
Capital has taken away even the goddesses’ voices. They cannot sing under capitalism. It is impos-
sible to sing without a voice.
The great idea of Marx: “People should arrogate to themselves PRODUCTION RELA-
TIONS”
What does Marx mean?
Nowadays, most young people are musical monkeys. They have no sense of pitch and musical con-
sciousness. Monkeys come to the elite begging for autographs. Monkeys fulfill any wishes of their
idols.
Under communism, people will recover their voices, and they will be able to sing. Under com-
munism, all people will get a musical education. All 100% of people will get a sense of pitch and
musical consciousness. All people will become musical people. Everyone will be able to sing,
dance, and compose music. There will be no musical monkeys under communism. And the Muse
goddesses will return to people.
Marx tells people: “Get your beautiful voices back, get your mind back”.
Results. The beautiful Marx’s theory of commodity-money fetishism is described by the fundamen-
tal constant of value ‫݌‬ʠ . The fundamental value constant ‫݌‬ʠ is a piece of gold that contains living
greedy souls of people. That is why this piece of gold came to life, and people died. It is impossible
to free greedy souls. Only loving hearts can be set free.
In the film “Shadow”, the dead scientist was revived by a loving heart and LIVING WATER. There
are LIVING MONEY and dead people on the planet. However, we can revive people, as there is the
living water of communism. Everything is true in Russian legends.
This is Marx, who prepared the LIVING WATER of humankind. His party nickname is “ZEUS OF
THE REVOLUTION”. And those who love all of humankind need only drink the living water of
communism.
The authors changed the name of Marx’s theory. Now it is called the theory of thing value fetish-
ism.
The biggest difficulty in political economy is the CONSTANT BIFURCATION

Excerpts from the authors’ book “Mathematized Hegel’s dialectics”.

Ideology and prayers of the splinter.
“Bifurcate at every step. Take a step and bifurcate. Split the categories at every step: “Split, split,
split”. But splitting a category is harder than splitting an atom. And if the category is split, then the
atom will split”. And the greatest splitter is Hegel.
Marx’s theory is the science of MAN, not of COMMODITIES or CAPITAL. Marx studies MON-
EY only because the average American has a monetary soul. We have to study MONEY to study
the soul of an American. An American can say to a girl: “You look like a million dollars”. He says
to the goddess: “You are dirty, stinking money”.
But how can we do this so the theory gives us all theorems as theorems about a man? Should we
split categories and bifurcate graphs?
 131
131


§ 9.5. The problem of constructing a model dual to the ideal gas law

Thermodynamics with a variable number of particles can describe the flow of commodities across a
border. That is right. However commodities and money form the ELECTRON-HOLE system. And
if the commodities cross the border, then a HOLE is formed in its place. This hole is covered by
MONEY. It is unknown whether it is possible to model such a phenomenon.
The theory of thing fetishism has a formal basis. According to this theory, the WORKER can be
considered a DEAD commodity-molecule. And MONEY can be considered LIVING PEOPLE. So
we can construct a dual equation to the ideal gas law.
The first attempt: we convert thing categories into value categories and vice versa.
We have:
‫݌‬஼ ܸ஼ ൌ ܰ௧ ݇௧ ߠ஼ 
We get:
‫݌‬௧ ܸ௧ ൌ ܰ஼ ݇஼ ߠ௧
We transform the equation:
ߠ௧ ሺܰ஼ ݇஼ ሻ ൌ ܸ௧ ‫݌‬௧
ߠ௧ െ ݊݁‫݁ݎݑݏݏ݁ݎ݌ݓ‬
ሺܰ஼ ݇஼ ሻ െ ݊݁‫݁݉ݑ݈݋ݒݓ‬
൦
ܸ௧ െ ݊݁‫ݏݏܽ݉ݓ‬
‫݌‬௧ െ ݊݁‫݁ݎݑݐܽݎ݁݌݉݁ݐݓ‬
There is a system of equations:
‫ ܸ ݌‬ൌ ܰ௧ ݇௧ ߠ஼ 
൜ ஼ ஼
ߠ௧ ሺܰ஼ ݇஼ ሻ ൌ ܸ௧ ‫݌‬௧

It is unknown whether the equation and the whole system have any sense.
The second attempt: the main political economic graph has three axial symmetries.
We reflect the graph relative to the largest central axis of symmetry. We get:
ሺ‫ܯ‬ ‫ܥ‬ ߠ௧ ‫݌‬௧ ܸ஼ ܵ ߠ஼ ‫݌‬஼ ሻ  ՜  ሺ‫݌‬஼ ߠ஼ ܵ ܸ஼ ‫݌‬௧ ߠ௧ ‫ܥ‬ ‫ܯ‬ሻ
We reflect the graph with relative to the two middle axes of symmetry. We get:
ሺ‫݌‬஼ ߠ஼ ܵ ܸ஼ ‫݌‬௧ ߠ௧ ‫ܥ‬ ‫ܯ‬ሻ  ՜  ሺܸ஼ ܵ ߠ஼ ‫݌‬஼ ‫ܯ‬ ‫ܥ‬ ߠ௧ ‫݌‬௧ ሻ
We reflect the graph with relative to the four small axes of symmetry. We get:
ሺܸ஼ ܵ ߠ஼ ‫݌‬஼ ‫ܯ‬ ‫ܥ‬ ߠ௧ ‫݌‬௧ ሻ  ՜ ሺܵ ܸ஼ ‫݌‬஼ ߠ஼ ‫ܥ‬ ‫ܯ‬ ‫݌‬௧ ߠ௧ ሻ
Result:
ሺܵ ܸ஼ ‫݌‬஼ ߠ஼ ‫ܥ‬ ‫ܯ‬ ‫݌‬஻ ߠ஻ ሻ

We replace commodities with people. The molecules are people. We get the table:
132 132

No. Categories
new old
1. ܵ New mass of people ‫ܯ‬
New consumer mass. New total heat ca-
2. ܸ஼ ‫ܥ‬
pacity of people
3. ‫݌‬஼ New thing temperature ߠ௧
4. ߠ஼ New thing pressure ‫݌‬௧
New labour value. New volume of com-
5. ‫ܥ‬ ܸ஼
modity mass
6. ‫ܯ‬ New entropy. The new use value of people ܵ
New temperature. New value of people,
7. ‫݌‬௧ ߠ஼
not commodities
New pressure. New fundamental constant
8. ߠ௧ ‫݌‬஼
for a commodities (not people)

We change the specific heat according to the following rule:

˔௏ ՜ ‫ݒ‬஼
There is a new ideal gas law:
ߠ஻ ʠ ൌ ܵ‫ݒ‬஼ ‫݌‬௧ 
We have the system:
‫ ܸ ݌‬ൌ ‫ܿܯ‬௏ ߠ
൜ ஼ ஼
ߠ௧ ʠ ൌ ܵ‫ݒ‬஼ ‫݌‬௧ 

It is unknown whether the system has any economic sense.

The law of the UNITY OF THE WORLD. Lenin’s favorite law

Maxwell’s equations Marx’s political economy
݄ܶ݁‫ݕݐ݅ܿ݅ݎݐ݈݂ܿ݁݁݋ݕݎ݋‬ ‫ ܸ ݌‬ൌ ‫ܿܯ‬௏ ߠ
൜ ൜ ஼ ஼
݄ܶ݁‫݉ݏ݅ݐ݂݁݊݃ܽ݉݋ݕݎ݋‬ ߠ஻ ʠ ൌ ܵ‫ݒ‬஼ ‫݌‬஻ 

If Lenin is right and the law of the unity of the world is a universal law, then there must be a system
of dual equations in political economy. The market should be modeled by two vessels with different
molecules. They must be connected by matching conditions with thermostats and heaters.

§ 9.6. Marx’s theory of labour productivity in thermodynamic form

Marx’s theory is cited in the wonderful book of Afanasyev Vladilen Sergeevich:

“The great discovery of Karl Marx. Methodological work of the dual nature of labour”.
The precise definitions of labour productivity will be formulated in an eight-dimensional category
space. And here are neither precise nor logical definitions.
Definition. The productivity of concrete labour is called
 133
133

ܰ݇
݅݊݁‫ݏݏ݁ܿ݋ݎ݌݉ݑ݅ݎܾ݈݅݅ݑݍ‬
൦ ܸ
ܵ
݅݊‫ݏݏ݁ܿ݋ݎ݌݊݋݅ݐ݅ݏ݊ܽݎݐ‬
ܸ
Consequence. The productivity of concrete labour increases if,
ܰ݇ ܵ
݀ ൐ 0‫ ݀ݎ݋‬൐ 0
ܸ ܸ
Definition. The productivity of abstract labour is called the fundamental constant ‫݌‬.
Consequence. The productivity of abstract labour increases if ݀‫ ݌‬൐ 0.
Marx’s theory of labour productivity in a two-dimensional world of categories:

ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ concretelabour
LABOUR ൌ ቚ ֜
abstractlabour

concretelabourproductivity
֜ Labourproductivity ൌ ฬ ൌ
abstractlabourproductivity

PRODUCTIVITYOFLABOUR
ൌቚ
INTENSITYOFLABOUR

Marx called the PRODUCTIVITY OF LABOUR the productivity of concrete labour. And he called
the productivity of abstract labour the INTENSITY OF LABOUR.
An increase of labour productivity due to a new technology, a good organization of labour, and a
rationalization of labour is a PRODUCTIVITY OF LABOUR. It is related only to concrete labour.
Lenin said: “The intensity of work is the intensity of labour per unit of time”.
The authors want to call the INTENSITY of LABOUR a measure of the labour exploitation. But
neither Marx nor Lenin made such a conclusion. Probably, the INTENSITY of LABOUR has a
slightly different physical sense. It is much better to follow the teachers of humankind in matters of
the economic sense of categories.
INTENSITY OF LABOUR is a measure of abstract labour per unit of time.
Lemma. The theorems of political economy do not exist outside of thermodynamic processes.
Marx describes various thermodynamic processes with his theorems.
There is Marx’s theorem of the productivity of concrete labour.
This thermodynamic process is possible when:

PRODUCTIVITYOFLABOURincreases
ቂ ֜
INTENSITYOFLABOURisconstant

݄ܶ݁‫ݏ݁ݏܽ݁ݎܿ݊݅ݏ݁ݑ݈ܽݒݎ݁݉ݑݏ݊݋݂ܿ݋݉ݑݏ‬
݄ܶ݁‫݄݁݃݊ܽܿݐ݋݊ݏ݁݋݀݁ݑ݈ܽݒݕ݁݊݋݈݉ܽݐ݋ݐ‬
֜൦
݄ܶ݁‫ݏ݈݈݂ܽ݁ݑ݈ܽݒݎ݁݉ݑݏ݊݋݂ܿ݋݁ܿ݅ݎ݌ݐ݅݊ݑ‬
݄݂ܶ݁‫݄݁݃݊ܽܿݐ݋݊ݏ݁݋݀ܧܷܮܣܸ݂݋ݐ݊ܽݐݏ݊݋݈ܿܽݐ݊݁݉ܽ݀݊ݑ‬

There is Marx’s theorem of the productivity of abstract labour.

This thermodynamic process is possible when:
134 134

PRODUCTIVITYOFLABOURisconstant
ቂ ֜
INTENSITYOFLABOURincrease
݄ܶ݁‫ݏ݁ݏܽ݁ݎܿ݊݅ݏ݁ݑ݈ܽݒݎ݁݉ݑݏ݊݋݂ܿ݋݉ݑݏ‬, ܾ‫݊݋݅ݐݎ݋݌݋ݎ݌ݐܿ݁ݎ݅݀݊݅ݐݑ‬
‫ۍ‬
‫ܧܷܮܣܸ݂݋݁ݏܽ݁ݎ݄ܿ݊݅݁ݐ݋ݐ‬
‫ێ‬
‫݄݁݃݊ܽܿݐ݋݊ݏ݁݋݀ߠ݁ݑ݈ܽݒݎ݁݉ݑݏ݊݋݂ܿ݋ݐ݅݊ݑ݂ܽ݋݁ܿ݅ݎ݌݄݁ݐ݁ݎ݋݂݁ݎ݄݁ܶێ‬
‫ݐ݊ܽݐݏ݊݋ܿݏ݅݁ݑ݈ܽݒݕ݁݊݋݈݉ܽݐ݋ݐ݄݁ܶ ێ‬
‫ݏ݁ݏܽ݁ݎܿ݊݅ܧܷܮܣܸ݈ܽݐ݋ݐ݄݁ܶ ۏ‬

§ 9.7. Marx’s theory of the productivity of concrete labour (POWER OF LABOUR) is mod-
eled by an isobaric-isochoric process with a variable number of particles
We have:
‫ ܸ݌‬ൌ ܰ݇ߠ
‫ۍ‬ ‫ ݌‬ൌ ܿ‫ ݐݏ݊݋‬ൌ ‫݌‬ଵ 
‫ێ‬
‫ێ‬ ܸ ൌ ܿ‫ ݐݏ݊݋‬ൌ ܸଵ 
‫ێ‬ ܰ െ ‫݈ܾ݁ܽ݅ݎܽݒ‬
‫ێ‬ ߤ െ ݄݈ܿ݁݉݅ܿܽ‫݈ܽ݅ݐ݊݁ݐ݋݌‬
‫ێ‬ ܷ ൌ ߠ݀ܵ െ ‫ ܸ݀݌‬൅ ߤܰ
‫ێ‬ ܰ݇
‫ێ‬ ݀ ൐0
‫ݏ݁ݏܽ݁ݎܴܱܿ݊݅ܤܣܮܨܱܴܧܹܱܲێ‬: ൦ ܸ 
‫ێ‬ ܵ
‫ۏ‬ ݀ ൐0
ܸ

The chemical potential ߤ is a tax.

The expected results according to Marx’s theory should be as follows:
1) The fundamental constant of value ‫ ݌‬is constant by condition.
2) Entropy (the total use value) increases.
3) The price ߠ decreases.
4) The total value is constant.
5) Should consumer mass (the total heat capacity) also increase?

Option No.1.
a) Isobaric-isochoric process with a variable number of particles is possible in physics.
b) It adequately reflects Marx’s theory.
Then such a process can be modeled as follows:
1) There is no thermostat-world market.
2) There is an accumulator of commodities.
3) There can be several chemical potentials regulating the transfer of commodities to the ac-
cumulator and vice versa.

A large accumulator with a set price ߚ

Commodities can be exported in both directions. The earned money can be imported and
exported.
When ߠ ൏ ߚ
The price of the commodity on the market is less than the price of the commodity in the ac-
 135
135

cumulator.
Market Sellers Market buyers Accumulator sellers Accumulator buyers
They take the com- They do not go to the They do not go to the
They go out of the
modities to the accu- accumulator. There is accumulator. There is
accumulator into the
mulator and pay the no sense. no sense.
market.
exit taxߤ
They sell commodities They take the com-
in the accumulator and modities to the ac-
bring the money cumulator and pay
home. the exit taxߤ
When ߠ ൐ ߚ
The price of the commodity on the market is more than the price of the commodity in the ac-
cumulator.
They do not go They go out of the market They go out of the accumula- They do not
out. into the accumulator. tor into the market. go out.
They buy the commodities They buy the commodities in
in the accumulator, pay the the market, pay the tax to the
tax to the accumulator and market and take the com-
take the commodities home. modities to the accumulator.

It is possible to consider cases when the taxes are different or when commodities can be exported,
but money cannot be exported. There are many options. It means that political economic thermody-
namics is more complicated than physical thermodynamics. We have given one more argument in
favor of the existence of a system of the ideal gas law in political economy.

In the isobaric-isochoric process, the tax must be set as a function ߤ ൌ ߤሺ‫݌‬, ܸሻ.

§ 9.8. Marx’s theory of the productivity of abstract labour (LABOUR INTENSITY is modeled
by an isochoric-isothermal process with a variable number of particles)

We have:
‫ ܸ݌‬ൌ ܰ݇ߠ
‫ ߠ ۍ‬ൌ ܿ‫ ݐݏ݊݋‬ൌ ߠ 
ଵ
‫ێ‬
ܸ ൌ ܿ‫ ݐݏ݊݋‬ൌ ܸଵ 
‫ێ‬
‫ ܰێ‬െ ‫݈ܾ݁ܽ݅ݎܽݒ‬
‫ ߤ ێ‬െ ݄݈ܿ݁݉݅ܿܽ‫݈ܽ݅ݐ݊݁ݐ݋݌‬
‫ ܷ ێ‬ൌ ߠ݀ܵ െ ‫ ܸ݀݌‬൅ ߤܰ
‫ݎݑ݋ܾ݈݂ܽ݋ݕݐ݅ݏ݊݁ݐ݊݅ ۏ‬: ݀‫ ݌‬൐ 0

The chemical potential ߤ is a tax.

The expected results according to Marx’s theory should be as follows:
1) The price ߠ is constant by condition.
2) Entropy (the total use value) increases.
3) The fundamental value constant ‫ ݌‬increases.
4) The total value increases.
136 136

5) Should consumer mass (the total heat capacity) also increase?

In the isobaric-isothermal process, taxes as a function ߤ ൌ ߤሺ‫݌‬, ߠሻ must be set.

§ 9.9.Marx’s theory of labour productivity in the eight-dimensional space of categories ષૡ .

The half of the main political economic graph has the form:

There should be four types of labour productivity in this space:

TWO PRODUCTIVITY OF SPECIFIC LABOUR
Productivity of specific labour in variable mass models:
߲‫ܥ‬ ߲‫ܥ‬
‫ۍ‬ ‫ݎ݋‬
‫ܯ߲ێ‬ ߲ܰ
‫ێ‬ ߲ܵ

‫ܸ߲ ۏ‬஼
Variable ‫ ܥ‬is the total heat capacity of the market, the total CONSUMER MASS, not the value. It
డ஼
can increase even when the commodity mass ‫ ܯ‬is constant. If ൐ 0, then the total consumer
డெ
mass has increased.
డௌ
Entropy S is the total USE VALUE. If ൐ 0, then the total use value has increased.
డ௏಴

TWO PRODUCTIVITY OF ABSTRACT LABOUR

The productivity of abstract labour:
߲‫݌‬௧
‫ۍ‬ 
‫ߠ߲ ێ‬௧
‫݌߲ ێ‬
‫ێ‬ 
‫ܸ߲ۏ‬஼
Variable ‫݌‬௧ is a gold bar, which is the carrier of the value ‫ ݌‬ൌ ‫݌‬େ .

It is still unclear how the two values ‫݌‬஻ , ‫݌‬஼ differ in the calculations. The variable ߠ஻ is a gold bar
which is the carrier of the money value ߠ ൌ ߠେ . It is still unclear how the two values ߠ஻ , ߠ஼ differ in
the calculations.
Probably the model needs to be expanded. Gold producers should be introduced into the model as a
separate class. There should be the exchange of gold for commodities. Then probably these varia-
bles make sense.
 137
137

డ௣
If ൐ 0 then the fundamental value constant increases.
డ௏಴

Why did we choose these four partial derivatives as different types of labour productivity? Why not
others? It is because Marx’s productivity of concrete labour is precisely identified.
డௌ డௌ
The value is the productivity of a concrete labour. If ൐ 0, then the use value increases. It
డ௏಴ డ௏಴
డௌ
means that the value is the POWER of LABOUR according to Marx.
డ௏಴
డ஼ డ௣ಳ డ௣಴
Other values , , are determined in accordance with the theory of duality.
డெ డఏಳ డఏ಴

Formally, all these values are different types of labour productivity:

߲‫ܯ‬ ߲‫ܥ‬ ߲ߠ஻ ߲‫݌‬஻ ߲ܸ ߲ܵ ߲ߠ஼ ߲‫݌‬஼
൬ ൌ1 ൰
߲ܸ ߲ܸ ߲ܸ ߲ܸ ߲ܸ ߲ܸ ߲ܸ ߲ܸ
డ௏
But there are seven of them, since ൌ 1. And there can be only eight or four values in dialectics.
డ௏
Therefore, we choose the number four.
Lemma. No theorems are possible outside of specific thermodynamic processes.
What should we take for labour productivity? Another fantastic version.
డ௏಴
We take the entropy for the time of the equilibrium process. Then the category can act as a
డௌ
measure of labour productivity.
Reasons for the existence of contradictions in the political economy of Marx
1. It is necessary to choose an eight-dimensional category space ȳ଼ .The whole theory should be
presented only in this eight-dimensional category space. Otherwise, there will be contradictions.
2. The maximum dimension of the space of Marx’s categories is unknown. If it is equal to 16, then
there will be unsolvable problems in the category space ȳ଼ .
3. Only the theory of models for Max’s CAPITAL will solve all the problems.
138 138

Chapter X. The MAIN POLITICAL ECONOMIC GRAPH: ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
ࡸ࡭࡮ࡻࢁࡾ ‫ ڂ‬ሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬሬԦ
࡯ࡻࡹࡹࡻࡰࡵࢀࢅ. We
need to deduce ALL categories.

§ 10.1. The plan for further modeling of Marx’s CAPITAL

1. It is necessary to create a special LOGICAL LANGUAGE for Marx’s Capital.
We need an alphabet and output rules. It is necessary to create a special dictionary with a minimum
set of categories and remove duplication.
Example. If the categories EXCHANGE and MARKET duplicate each other, then one of these cat-
egories should be discarded.
2. It is necessary to determine the dimensions of the categories. We need to remove the evolution of
Marx’s money from the model and point out that old money dies and new money is born in the
transition process.
3. Banks need to be modeled.
4. Classes need to be modeled.
5. It is necessary to strictly follow Hegel’s dialectic and divide all categories into dialectical pairs.
The same category can only be included in one dialectical pair. This is the Hegelian LAW OF THE
UNIQUENESS OF A PAIR. If, for some reason, one category is included in two pairs, it means
that they are close, but not identical categories, and then they need to bedistinguished.
6.It is necessary to define the RATE OF PROFIT as the second FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANT.
7. MARX’S CALCULATION SCHEMES need to be modeled. Marx’s calculation schemes are
cosmological equations. They describe the movement of the entire world economy.
8. It is necessary to create a quantum model of Marx’s Capital!
9. The Marx’s Capital should be presented in the form of a rigorous mathematical theory with axi-
oms and theorems.
10. Example. Definition of private property.
Definition. PRIVATE PROPERTY IS THE PROPERTY OF ONE PERSON.
Shares are not private property. Shares are collective property, the property of a collective of capi-
talists. So, shares are a collective capitalist form of ownership.
Consequence. The socialist general secretary is also the owner of semi-private property.
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CAPITALISM AND SMALL-SCALE PRODUCTION
Small-scale production is regulated by one fundamental constant: the fundamental constant of value
‫݌‬. It is an analogue of pressure.
Capitalist production is regulated by two fundamental constants: the fundamental constant of value
and the RATE OF PROFIT. And it is necessary to define the RATE OF PROFIT as the second
FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANT in the mathematical model of capitalist production and find its an-
alogue in physics.
Since LABOUR POWER became a COMMODITY under capitalism, a WORKER must be consid-
ered the molecule of the market.
Political economy is a cursed science. Everything is not what it seems. Fetishism reverses causes
and consequences. You never know if you are standing normally or upside down.
 139
139

On the example of our model of thirty pages of Marx’s CAPITAL, it is clear that THING
FETESHISM is everywhere. But there is a solution. We need to create a THEORY OF MODELS
for Marx’s Capital. There will be many mistakes without THEORY OF MODELS. There is another
value: the organic structure of capital. It can also be considered a constant in some processes.
MARX’S POLITICAL ECONOMY AS A QUANTUM POLITICAL ECONOMY
Each thermodynamics has its own statistical physics. Therefore, there must also be a quantum mod-
el of Marx’s CAPITAL. THE LAW OF THE UNITY OF THE WORLD. The philosophical justifi-
cation for the existence of Marx’s quantum model of Capital is the theorem of the Great Engels.
The theorem. Engels is in our editorial office. Dialectics of nature:
“MAN IS A STATISTICAL ATOM OF HISTORY”.
Here we retell Engels’ words. Engels says that people bump into each other like atoms. And as a
result of the action of statistical laws, a VECTOR OF HISTORY is born, which no longer depends
on people. Rome died after completing a historic mission. Feudalism came and left. Capitalism
came. Then socialism came. Socialism has played its outstanding historical role and died of old age.
The era of socialism has gone down in history. Humankind has reached the finish line of history.
THERE IS ONLY PURE COMMUNISM AHEAD.
COMMUNISM WILL BE BUILT, BYPASSING SOCIALISM.
But the political economic laws of the new world are different from the physical laws.
PEOPLE SHOULD STUDY THE THEORIES OF HEGEL, MARX, ENGELS, AND LENIN.
And then, a new world will be built without a civil war. There will be millions of smartest young
people on the planet. The theories of leaders will give rise to millions of new leaders, millions of
new Marxes, Hegels, Engels, Lenins. The old world will have enough of a political economic heart
attack.

THE SOCIETY OF THE FUTURE IS A NEW HELLAS

Why did people go with questions to Diogenes? The rich people called Diogenes “Diogenes the
Dog” for his life in a sea barrel. But, despite this nickname, smart rich people also went to Dioge-
nes, because they were interested in the secrets of the universe. They did not go to Diogenes with
questions of how to get rich. The Greeks went with clever questions and waited for a clever answer
about the mysteries of humankind.

America Hellas
“You look like a million dollars”. It means “The bridge is beautiful as a GIRL”. For the Greeks,
that you are fantastic, you are the spitting the girl was the goddess of beauty. She was the
image of a golden idol, and you are a ton of measure of everything beautiful. The Greeks com-
gold. pared everything to a girl.
American. Of all things and people the Protagoras. OF ALL THINGS THE MEASURE IS
measure is GOLD (value) of the things that MAN, of the things that are, that they are, and of the
are, that they are, and of the things that are things that are not, that they are not.
not, that they are not.
The bottom line is that everything turns upside down!
Marx said: “CAPITALISM IS AN UPSIDE DOWN WORLD”

Marx’s theorem. Capitalism is a world that stands upside down. And the task of people is to fix it
and put SOCIETY on its feet.
140 140

The law of total inversion under capitalism was discovered by Marx. And it is included as part of
Marx’s theory of thing VALUE fetishism.
Fetishistic glasses turn everything upside down. Absolutely everything. The thing fetishist sees the
world upside down. He takes the cause for the consequence, and the consequence for the cause. The
thing fetishist thinks that his inverted world is the real world. The massive conversion of MEN to
“WOMEN” and WOMEN to “MEN” is a consequence of the reversal of Marx’s theory. This con-
version shows that capitalism has come to an end. However, socialism also died of old age. Only
PURE COMMUNISM is ahead.

§ 10.2. The need to create a new science “MODEL THEORY” for Marx’s CAPITAL

Lobachevsky’s axiomatic geometry is difficult to understand. For this reason, even famous mathe-
maticians did not accept it. But model theory has changed everything.
After the Poincaré half-plane model of Lobachevsky, the non-Euclidean geometry became clear
since all its axioms and theorems can be clearly demonstrated in the Poincaré model. And soon a
new science appeared in logic, which is called the model theory.
The main postulate of this new science is:
“Any axiomatic theory must have its own visual model”. Thus, it is the turn of political economic
thermodynamics. It needs a model more than Lobachevsky’s geometry does. The political economy
of Marx is a VIRTUAL SCIENCE.
Everything in it IS NOT WHAT IT SEEMES. Let’s show it.
Here we consider any market in any city. Consider any market in any city. Can it be described by a
thermodynamic model? It is hard to be described. After all, both buyers and sellers of commodities
are variable people. And this market gas does not exist from the point of view of thermodynamics
of a glass vessel.
The vessel must be modeled! Next, we need to model a commodity-molecule in thermodynamics. It
is also necessary to model its collision. However, it is not easy either.
A man comes to the market. He looks around the entire market with greedy eyes. This man-
molecule can be considered to have collided with all the other traders-molecules.
How does Marx differ from all other scientists? Marx always sees a person, not a commodity. So
we, following Marx, depicted the collision of commodities as a collision of people. And it turned
out that it is not so easy to model a collision of commodities in the market.

THE VIRTUAL WORLD of Marx’s Political Economy

Biology Political economy of Marx

Biology In biology Political Economy In political economy
Man has He cannot work. He is Man is armless. He has no political
Man is living.
hands called “the armless man”. economic hands.
Man has Man is not He cannot sing. He is Man is deaf. He has no political
hearing. deaf. called “the deaf man”. economic ears.
Man is dead. When we kill MON-
Money is Money is a LIVING
Man is living EY, we WILL REVIVE OUR-
“dead” paper. THING.
SELVES.
It comes to life only temporarily,
Proletarian Living Dead
during the revolution. But in the last
 141
141

revolution, he will come to life for-
ever.
People are the living dead.

From Marx’s point of view, our planet is the planet of the dead. People are just bodies of nothing.
People only seem living. In fact, they are dead. They cannot walk without LIVING CAPITAL or
LIVING STATE. The socialist revolution was an outbreak. The people of socialism came to life for
a while, and living people performed miracles. But then the social idea exhausted itself, and people
died.
PEOPLE WILL COME TO LIFE, and states and money will die forever in a communist (non-
socialist) revolution.
Why were slaves called “living dead” in ancient Egypt and Rome? The answer is that slaves were
forbidden to laugh. But even now, people do not laugh at factories and universities. The dead can-
not even smile. But soon people will say to both businessmen and chiefs: “Let us laugh”.
Hegel’s great theory of IDEALISM
The idea of socialism lived in the souls of the Soviet people. Socialism was also alive. But social-
ism has fulfilled its historic duty. The idea of socialism has aged and died in the souls of people.
Socialism died of old age. And no one is to blame for this.

But soon a new IDEA will be born in the souls of people – it is the IDEA of a global commune.

In America, they say In Russia, they say

“Will you trust your wallet to him?” “Will you go with him to intelligence?”
If you entrusted your wallet, then you can en- The question is, will you trust your life to him
trust your wife and your life. For an American, or not.
his life and his wife are nothing compared to
money.
“You are better than a brother, you are a part- “Die, but help your brothers”
ner”
A partner is a money friend A brother is a brother
From the “Octopus” movie: “When money People do sing in Russia. But now they are al-
sings, the muse is silent”. so silent, because MONEY is singing.

Marx’s Theory of VALUE Fetishism

At first, the money was just pieces of paper. But then they absorbed THE GREED OF THE PEO-
PLE and CAME TO LIFE, and the people died.
Question. How many money proverbs are there in America? The answer is – more than thousands.
All American speech is expressed in money. The American as a person has not been born yet. He is
only a human embryo. This fact can be shown by modeling the value fetishism of Marx.
The model of the thing VALUE fetishism. Fetishism No. 1
There is an American. He is enclosed in a GOLDEN SPHERE. He is in the golden prison and he is
okay with it. But he is not a human, he is a money creature. Any thought, any feeling that comes
from him, is immediately surrounded by a golden money sphere, and flies across the planet. There-
fore, his entire vocabulary has a monetary form. He has no human words.
Examples.
142 142

American proverb: “Nothing is certain except for death and taxes”. The death of his own father,
whom he has not seen for ten years, is a trifle. The real death is taxes. If the dollar dies, that is a big
tragedy.
American proverb: “Money is freedom made of gold”. Here we also can see that the concept of
freedom does not mean human freedom, but it is freedom of money. The bottom line is that every
human word in America has a money analogy. And there are no human words. But there is no new
Balzac who would describe all this in his works, because Western writers live in a golden sphere
and consider their life to be human life.
The veracity of American cinema
The film “THE MATRIX” is a demonstration of Hegel-Marx’s theory of thing fetishism. The ma-
trix, within which the man of the West exists, is GOLD. Living for money is an illusory human life.
The authors of the work feel that they are not people, they do not live like HUMAN, and that they
DO NOT LIVE AT ALL, they are in the MATRIX.
It is not normal when a man is less happy with his child than with his money. So, the MATRIX
movie was created long ago by the Great Hegel and the Great Marx. But the authors of the film did
not know this, because they received a lot of money from the MATRIX. And therefore they are
pleased to be in the MATRIX of capitalism. They are pleased to go to expensive shops; they are
pleased to buy young lovers. However, they are living and thinking people; sometimes they cannot
sleep at night and think: “Something is wrong in this world, something is wrong. Perhaps we really
do not live; maybe we are in the MATRIX now?”
Hegel and Marx can respond with the theory of thing VALUE fetishism:
People! You really do not live; you really are in the GOLDEN MATRIX OF CAPITALISM. You
are embryos of history. You have not yet been born as PEOPLE and as new great GODS.
According to Marx, under capitalism, only MONEY is LIVING, and a man is a political economic
DEAD.
According to Marx, under socialism, only the STATE is LIVING, and a person is DEAD (in politi-
cal economy).
In biology, people are living beings, and money is just dead pieces of paper. But in Marx’s virtual
political economy, the opposite is true. There are only two living beings on the planet in Marx’s po-
litical economy. These two living gods are LIVING MONEY and LIVING STATE. These two dark
Gods control eight billion political economic DEAD. People are the living dead. They do not laugh.
Dead people are not supposed to laugh.
The STATE is a LIVING SELF-ROTATING MACHINE in Marx’s theory. The STATE rotates
neither by presidents nor by ministers. The HUGE LIVING ROBOT rotates both ministers and
workers. In scientific language it sounds like this:
Theorem. The LAWS of SELF-MOTION and the LIFE of the ROBOT-STATE are OBJECTIVE.
They do not depend on people. They do not depend on the ministers and the president.
The president and the minister are only the main priests of their great God- STATE. The priest can-
not control his God. The God-State controls its priest. The God-State fulfills its historical mission
through its great priests. But Marx claims that the historical mission of the two great DARK GODS
is completed. Man no longer needs them. Man is able to live without them.
THE WALKING DEAD (TV SERIES)
The creators of this TV series feel that the planet smells dead. They realize that the world is rotten,
that the dead devour people.
Hegel said: “THE DEAD SEIZES THE LIVING”.
 143
143

But the bottom line is that the WALKING DEAD series has been written for a long time. And its
authors are Marx and Hegel. And these LIVING DEAD devouring people are LIVING MONEY
(not capitalists!), and LIVING STATE (not ministers!). Two living dark Gods have grown old and
are rotting now. It is time for them to go the way of the dodo.
American horror movies with living dolls
Here are some names: Blood Dolls, Puppet Master, and Demonic Toys. These films are excellent
guides to Marx’s theory of commodity-money fetishism. Why do directors make such horror films?
Well, because the director is a human. He feels that commodities have come to life and control peo-
ple. There is a garbage island the size of France in the Pacific Ocean. Death threatens not only riv-
ers and lakes, but also oceans. And this is real horror.
Living MONEY and COMMODITIES force people kill each other. They force people destroy the
oceans. Soon they will force people to kill themselves, to kill all mankind.
Neither the bourgeoisie nor the oligarchs are to blame for this horror. Both the bourgeoisie and the
oligarchs are only priests of their great God CAPITAL. And CAPITAL is neither a man, nor oli-
garchs.
CAPITAL is LIVING, self-growing MONEY.
CAPITAL does not obey its oligarch priests. CAPITAL lives and grows according to its own laws.
Oligarchs are only priests of their beloved great god.
The laws of birth and reproduction of this great creature, this great immortal god, were discovered
by Karl Marx. And now we know that CAPITAL is mortal and it can be killed (not oligarchs, not
people, but CAPITAL).
THE THEORY OF THE POLITICAL ECONOMIC DEAD by Marx
Marx. When LIVING MONEY dies (not capitalists, not people, but MONEY), when a LIVING
STATE dies (not ministers, not people, but COMMAND), then PEOPLE WILL COME TO LIFE!
144 144

Chapter XI. Derivation of the laws of dialectics and political economy by using MULTIPLI-
CATION OF DIALECTICAL PAIRS

§ 11.1. Multiplication of dialectical pairs and transformation of a complex pair into a graph

Philosophers felt the need of their ancient science to be mathematized. But having humanitarian
mindset, they could not grow as high as Viet, who introduced notations into algebra and immediate-
ly derived Vieta’s theorem for a quadratic equation. Philosophers have not tumbled to an idea of
studying the A-B abstract pair. Nevertheless, they had one. The THING-RELATION pair served as
an abstract pair. Let us introduce the notation and multiply the pairs:

There is the graph of the product we have got:

§ 11.2. Derivation of the LENIN’S DEFINITION OF THE LAW by multiplying dialectical

pairs

Lenin’s theorem

Theorem-axiom. The LAW is an ESSENCE and a RELATION between ESSENCES. There are
several equivalent formulations.
Theorem-axiom. The LAW is a RELATION and a RELATION between RELATIONS, i.e., a sec-
ond-order relation.
 145
145

Theorem-axiom. The LAW is an ESSENCE and an ESSENCE of an ESSENCE, i.e., the second-
order ESSENCE.
We have already obtained the Lenin’s definition by multiplying pairs. Multiplication of suitable
pairs makes it possible to obtain various versions of Lenin’s definition of the law:

§ 11.3. Interpretation of Lenin’s theorem on the LAW in linear and projective geometries

Linear geometry

Thales’ theorem. THE RATIO OF SEGMENTS is an invariant of a parallel projection, i.e., with a
஺஻ ாி
parallel projection, the following equality is true: ൌ
஻஼ ிு

Projective geometry

Theorem of projective geometry. THE RATIO BETWEEN THE RATIOS OF SEGMENTS is an

invariant of the central projection, i.e., with the central projection, the following equality is true:
ಲಳ ಶಷ
ಳವ
ಲ಴ ൌ ಷು
ಶಹ
಴ವ ಹು

LENIN

1. The law (invariant) is THE RATIO OF SEGMENTS.

2. The law (invariant) is THE RATIO BETWEEN THE RATIOS OF SEGMENTS.
146 146

Lenin’s works made it clear that categories need to be split TWICE. This is how the SPLITTERS
IDEOLOGY was born.
The splitter’s prayer is “SPLIT, SPLIT, SPLIT. Bifurcate, bifurcate, and bifurcate. Bifurcate it
when you take a step”.
It is necessary to bear in mind that SPLITTING A CATEGORY is more complex than SPLITTING
AN ATOM. Before splitting the atom, the category must be split. If the category is split, the atom
will be split as well.
The creation of scientific ideologies and scientific prayers is one of the tasks of philosophy. A phi-
losopher is a scientific dialectical priest who creates scientific dialectical prayers and makes scien-
tists keep telling them.
Lenin’s work made it clear that the Marx’s CAPITAL needs to be expressed in the form of a
FOUR-DIMENSIONAL SPACE OF CATEGORIES. The question arises: should mathematical
logic be four-dimensional?

Lenin is the great political philosopher

Lenin’s political works are written only in philosophical language. Lenin has no other language. In
all fifty-five books written by him, Lenin uses the DETERMINISM theory, the law of the UNITY
OF THE WORLD, the REFLECTION theory, the principle of DEVELOPMENT (Hegel), the law
of the negation of the negation, the law of TIME REVERSION, the theory of universal connection,
the theory of TRANSITIONS, etc.
Lenin develops all major decisions on building a new world from the laws of DIALECTICS! Lenin
PROVES EVERYTHING and demands the same from the revolutionaries. Lenin tried to teach phi-
losophy to all his close associates. But the leaders bit Lenin from all sides as if they were dogs.
Even performing before the weavers, Lenin touched upon the theorems of philosophy!
Lenin’s works are incredibly complex. They contain HUNDREDS of new IDEAS.
Only MATHEMATICS or PHYSICISTS are able to study Lenin’s works.

The works of Lenin, Hegel, Marx, Engels are COMPLETELY IDENTICAL to each other. There
cannot be two physics, two biologies. It is just as true as it is impossible to have two dialectics or
two political economies of socialism, or two political economies of communism. In pursuance of
the principle of DETERMINISM, there is always ONE TRUTH.
 147
147

Chapter XII. IDEAL MONEY MARKET model

§ 12.1. Market model in the form of an ideal gas state equation with VALUES enclosed within
the GOLD-THING

At this point, a GOLD-RELATION is a VALUE. The GOLD-RELATION is a universal measurer.

By conditional calculation, we have determinated the fundamental constant of the world market,
which is conditionally equal to:
gramofgold
‫݌‬෤ ൌ 2.05 .
labourhour
Let us suppose that we sell wheat with a commodity weight of ‫ ܯ‬tons and a labour time of ܸ. The
molecule is one ton of the commodity, then the number of molecules is ܰ ൌ ‫ܯ‬.
The market model is as follows:
‫ ܸ݌‬ൌ ܰ݇ߠ
‫ ܥۓ‬ൌ 1݇
ۖ ௏
ۖ‫ܥ‬௉ ൌ 2݇
ܴ ൌ 1݇
‫ܰ ۔‬஺ ൌ 1
ۖ ݇ ൌ 1
ۖ ܷ ൌ ܰ݇ߠ
‫ ܰ ە‬ൌ ‫ܯ‬

§ 12.2. The local LAW OF VALUE acts in differential form in the TANGENT SPACE of the
manifold of states

Theorem. THE LAW OF VALUE.

In the isobaric process, the unit price of a commodity’s use value is directly proportional to its la-
bour value. The proportionality factor is the fundamental constant of value:

ܸ
ߠൌ‫݌‬
ܰ݇

The ‫ ݌‬parameter is constantduring the entire isobaric process. The law of value is similar to the law
of direct proportion. However, this formulation veils the essence of the ongoing events even for the
isobaric process due to the nonlinear dependence. The law of value is by no means similar to the
equation of a straight line. To correctly represent the law of value, we must use differentials. So, we
have the following for the isobaric process:

ܸ
݀ߠ ൌ ‫݀݌‬ .
ܰ݇

Therefore, the law of value is indeed the law of direct proportion for an isobaric process, but there
are the following additions:
1) The law of value for the isobaric process acts as the law of direct proportion only in dif-
ferential form.
2) The law of value is performed only locally, in the tangent space of the manifold of
states.
Local law of value for the isobaric process
148 148

An infinitesimal change in the value of labour time per unit of use value causes a proportional infin-
itesimal change in price. The direct proportion coefficient is the fundamental constant of value.
The law of value for arbitrary processes
The ‫݌‬, ܸ, ߠ variables generate a state surface. But the equations themselves do not form a closed
system of equations. The process itself must be specified. This selected process is a specific line on
the surface of states. Let us fix the point ‫݌‬଴ , ܸ଴ , ߠ଴ . At this point, we consider a tangent surface and a
straight line tangent to the process line. The tangent curve is on the tangent plane. Let us write the
equation of state in differential form:
‫ ܸ݀݌‬൅ ܸ݀‫ ݌‬ൌ ܰ݇݀ߠ.
At this stage, we consider the number of commodities (commodity weight) constant. This is incor-
rect, but there are problems with variable commodity weight. Our goal is to obtain accurate equa-
tions of the market state. We get:
ܸ ܸ
݀ߠ ൌ ‫݀݌‬ ൅ ݀‫݌‬.
ܰ݇ ܰ݇
Using the coordinates of a specific point, we get as follows:
ܸ ܸ଴
݀ߠ ൌ ‫݌‬଴ ݀ ൅ ݀‫݌‬
ܰ݇ ܰ݇
But the law of value is only the first part of this equation, i.e., the following formula:
ܸ
݀ߠ ൌ ‫݌‬଴ ݀ .
ܰ݇
௏బ
݀‫݌‬means that the local law of value is constantly violated in all processes, except for the isobar-
ே௞
ic process. But the sum of these violations is zero. So, the law of value is divided into the local law
of value and the global law of value.

§ 12.3. The GLOBAL LAW of VALUE IS the LAW of CONSERVATION

This law of value is the universal law of conservation of matter and energy.

The local law of value

This law acts around the selected point. Or more precisely, it acts on the tangent plane and tangent
line of the selected process. Variable differentials are tangent vectors. It means that the differentials
of the parameters are in the tangent plane and the tangent line. Let us introduce a new variable:
ܸ
‫ݒ‬ൌ .
ܰ݇
௏
We set specific values to variables. Let us assume that ‫݌‬଴ ൌ 5, బ ൌ 10, then the local equation of
ே௞
state is as follows:
݀ߠ ൌ ‫݌‬଴ ݀‫ ݒ‬൅ 10݀‫ ݌‬ൌ 5݀‫ ݒ‬൅ 10݀‫݌‬.
In increments, the formula is:
οߠ ൌ ‫݌‬଴ ο‫ ݒ‬൅ 10ο‫ ݌‬ൌ 5ο‫ ݒ‬൅ 10ο‫݌‬.
The law of value itself isοܶ ൌ ‫݌‬଴ ο‫ ݒ‬ൌ 5ο‫ݒ‬. We see that the law of value is locally violated on a
constant basis, but in total these violations neutralize each other. We have a flaw in our thought
process. We have defined a specific process, the graph of which is a line located on the surface of
states. Its graph can be found from the solution to this thermodynamic problem, i.e., the dependency
can be obtained:
 149
149

‫ ݌‬ൌ ‫݌‬ሺ‫ݒ‬, ߠ଴ ሻ ൌ ‫݌‬ሺ‫ݒ‬ሻ ֜ ݀‫ ݌‬ൌ ‫݌‬ᇱ ݀‫ݒ‬.
At our particular point, let the values be ݀‫ ݌‬ൌ 0.3݀‫ݒ‬.Substituting these values into the differentials
of the state, we get the following:
݀ߠ ൌ ‫݌‬଴ ݀‫ ݒ‬൅ 10݀‫ ݌‬ൌ 5݀‫ ݒ‬൅ 10݀‫ ݌‬ൌ 5݀‫ ݒ‬൅ 10 ‫ כ‬0.3݀‫ ݒ‬ൌ 8݀‫ݒ‬.

Let us write the equations of state in increments in the tangent space at a given point.

Local law of value Real local motion of the system

݀ߠ ൌ ‫݌‬଴ ݀‫ ݒ‬ൌ 5݀‫ݒ‬ ݀ߠ ൌ 8݀‫ݒ‬
οߠ ൌ 5ο‫ݒ‬. οߠ ൌ 8ο‫ݒ‬
With an increase in production volumes by an infinitesimal value, we get
under the law of value more than under the law of value
five infinitesimal units eight infinitesimal units
We will stand to benefit from small increases in production. We will get ahead of our com-
petitors in the market. The ideal gas equations tell us that local expansion of production is
beneficial to us.
But the local maximum may not be global
150 150

Chapter XIII. Reproduction. Marx’s schemes
§ 13.1. The law of value under capitalism
Hypothesis. Theorem. The capitalist company acts as a heat engine of a new type.
Consequence. The functioning of the capitalist company as a heat engine demonstrates the opera-
tion of the law of value under capitalism.

§ 13.2. Simple reproduction in thermodynamic form. Marx’s scheme

There is an example given by Marx:

Book II. Capital. Simple production. Marx’s example:

Industry 1 4000ሺܿ1ሻ ൅ 1000ሺ‫ݒ‬1ሻ ൅ 1000ሺ݉1ሻ ൌ 6000 In the means of production
Industry 2 2000ሺܿ2ሻ ൅ 500ሺ‫ݒ‬2ሻ ൅ 500ሺ݉2ሻ ൌ 3000 In commodities

Hypothesis.
Industry I is a heat engine I.
Industry II is a heat engine II.
Simple production is a system of two connected heat engines. A process must also be defined.

§ 13.3. Simple reproduction in standard form. Marx’s scheme

The capitalist market can have three fundamental constants.

Fundamental constants of the capitalist market

st
1 ‫݌‬ Fundamental constant of value
2nd ݉ Rate of profit
ܿ൅‫ݒ‬
3rd ‫ݒ‬ Organic composition of capital
ܿ

In accordance with our loose calculation, the fundamental constant in the United States is:
gramofgold
‫ ݌‬ൌ 2.55
݈ܾܽ‫ݎݑ݋݄݁ݑ݈ܽݒݎݑ݋‬
The minimum wage in the U.S. is ‫ ݒ‬ൌ 10 dollars per hour. The gold value is 50 dollars per gram.
Thuswise, the minimum wage is ‫ ݒ‬ൌ 0.2 grams of gold.
Abstract surplus value
The United States worker produces ‫ ݌‬ൌ 2.55 grams of gold per labour value hour and receives
‫ ݒ‬ൌ 0.2 grams of gold. Let us calculate the surplus value using Marx’s formula:
‫ ݌‬ൌ ‫ ݒ‬൅ ݉ ֜ ݉ ൌ ‫ ݌‬െ ‫ ݒ‬ൌ 2.55 െ 0.2 ൌ 2.32gramsofgold
It turns out that the surplus value is incredible high. And the worker receives an incredible slight
share of the value created by him:
‫ݒ‬ 0.2
ൌ ‫ כ‬100% ൌ 7.8%
‫ ݌‬2.55
 151
151


The average weekly wage in America is 881 dollars. The working week is 35 hours.

It follows that the average hourly wage is ‫ ݒ‬ൌ 25.2 dollars per hour. We have ‫ ݒ‬ൌ 0.5 grams of
gold.
݉ ൌ ‫ ݌‬െ ‫ ݒ‬ൌ 2.55 െ 0.5 ൌ 2.05gramsofgold

‫ݒ‬ 0.5
ൌ ‫ כ‬100% ൌ 19.6%
‫ ݌‬2.55

The reasons for such small amounts as a result:

Reason 1. Our model is incorrect. There is no total confidence in the correctness of our model. Only
the model application to the real market can provide total confidence.
An appeal to physicists. There is a need to calculate the thermodynamic process (isobaric, isother-
mal) in the world grain market. Such a calculation can be carried out without resorting to experi-
ments through the use of the similarity theory.
Reason 2. In many industries, wage is much higher than the minimum wage of 10 dollars.
Reason 3. In this case, the surplus value ݉ ൌ ‫ ݌‬െ ‫ ݒ‬ൌ 2.32gramsofgold is not real surplus value.
The real one is formed at a real enterprise. In such a situation, what does the following value ex-
press?
݉ ൌ 2.32gramsofgold
There is the calculation of the degree of parasitism of capitalism under the principle of equality of
people.
There is an average wage for the working people. Let us eliminate all parasites.
The question concerning parasites is complicated. The chief physician is a practicing physician at a
hospital. Time he spends on management is parasitic since it does not create value. But time spent
on performing surgeries creates value.
After the elimination of parasites, there are working people and semi-working semi-parasites. Foot-
ball players create a commodity-service, but they are semi-parasites. We reduce the wage of foot-
ball players and all semi-working semi-parasites to the average wage.
In that way, we get the monetary amount of real labour, which is small compared to the entire mon-
ey quantity received by the parasites.
Thus, a small share of workers’ wages is true from the standpoint of pure communism: 
‫ݒ‬ 0.5
ൌ ‫ כ‬100% ൌ 19.6%
‫ ݌‬2.55
Reason 4. Is the following value true and real?
‫ݒ‬
ൌ 19.6%
‫݌‬
Do the workers indeed receive only a fifth of what they create?

Marx’s Capital as a virtual science

Marx’s lemma. Complicated labour can be reduced to simple labour.

This Marx’s lemma is necessary in order to make workers out to be virtual worker-molecules.

Consequence

1. The real number of workers and the number of workers-molecules coincide with each other in the
large model (in the entire country’s model).
152 152

2. The real number of workers and the number of workers-molecules may not coincide with each
other in the model of an individual company.
Example. The simple labour-molecule is defined in the model of the entire country. We consider an
individual company, where

complicatedlabour ൌ 2simplelabour
one ൌ complexworker ൌ 2simpleworkers ൌ 2people

Conclusions. In the mathematical model of this company, there are twice as many workers-
molecules as the real number of workers.
Marx’s axioms of simple production

1. The simple production consists of two industries:

Industry I is production of the means of production;
Industry II is production of the means of consumption.
2. The market is value, not money.
In spite of the formal presence of money in this model, money does not play a meaningful role.
3. The market is in the equilibrium state. We do not consider transition processes.
4. The first and major fundamental constant of value ‫ ݌‬is constant.
௩
5. The 3rd fundamental constant is the organic composition of capital . In the example given by
௖
௩
Marx, it is equal to 100%, i.e., ൌ 1 ൌ 100%.
௖
6. Production is simple, not expanded, i.e., the capitalist spends all the surplus value on personal
consumption.
7. Such elements of constant capital are not considered as buildings.
8. The calculation period is 1 year.
9. The wage is issued once a year.
10. The depreciation of the constant capital is 1 year.
Appeal to mathematicians. There is a need to introduce new notations in Marx’s Capital and to
model and visualize Marx’s Capital.

Notations
Parameters of the industry I (production of the means of production) are denoted by capital letters.
Parameters of the industry II (production of the means of consumption) are denoted by small letters.

The start of the production. The beginning of the year.

Industry I is production of the means of production

Capital and its form Capital and its form Workers

Constant ‫ܥ‬ଵ (machines, ‫ܥ‬ଵ ሺmachines, materials) At the labour market, work-
materials) ers sold their LABOUR
Variable ܸଵ (money, values) ܸ ሺworkersሻ POWER for ܸଵ , which is the
Hired Variableଵcapital in the form price of labour power in the
workers of living people labour market. But workers
will receive money only at
the end of the labour period.
It means that they are
advancing the capitalists.
 153
153

The end of the production. The end of the year.

Depreciation Capital Form of capital Workers

Old machines Constant ‫ܥ‬෪ଵ ൌ ‫ܥ‬ଵ New machines, The workers received an amount of
are worn out new materials money‫ݒ‬ଶ , which was determined
There are no Variable ܸ෩ଵ ൌ ܸଵ New machines, before the start of production. Vari-
workers. They new materials able ‫ݒ‬ଶ is not payment for labour,
are gone. since the amount of money was de-
Surplus ‫ܯ‬ଵ New machines, termined when the amount of la-
value new materials bour was unknown. Workers leave
after receiving money

The start of the production. The beginning of the year.

Industry II is production of the means of consumption.

Capital and its form Capital and its Workers

form
Constant ˔ଶ (machines, ˔ଶ (machines, ma- At the labour market, workers sold their
materials) terials) LABOUR POWER for ‫ݒ‬ଵ , which is the
Hired
price of labour power in the labour mar-
workers
Variable ‫ݒ‬ଶ (money, ‫ݒ‬ଶ ሺworkersሻ ket. But workers will receive money only
values) Variable capital in at the end of the labour period. It means
the form of living that they are advancing the capitalists.
people


The end of the production. The end of the year.

Depreciation Capital Form of capital Workers

Old ma- Constant Consumer The workers received an amount of
chines are ˔෥ଶ ൌ ˔ଶ products money‫ݒ‬ଶ , which was determined
worn out before the start of production. Varia-
There are no Variable Consumer ble ‫ݒ‬ଶ is not payment for labour,
‫ݒ‬
෦ଶ ൌ ‫ݒ‬ଶ since the amount of money was de-
workers. products
They are termined when the amount of labour
Surplus Consumer
gone. ݉ଵ was unknown. Workers leave after
value products
receiving money

There is an exchange between the industries at the end of the year

Industries Capital Workers. They are no longer

capital. They are strangers.
constant variable surplus value They have sums of money
I ‫ܥ‬ଵ - machines ܸଵ - machines ܸଵ - machines ܸଵ (money) Workers I
II ˔ଶ - food products ‫ݒ‬ଶ - food ݉ଶ - food prod- ‫ݒ‬ଶ (money) Workers II
products ucts
154 154

Industry II
1) Workers II buy food products from their own capitalist II and eat it.
2) Capitalist II eats his surplus value (food products) ݉ଶ .
Industry II
Capitalist II made new machines and restored his constant capital in the same amount -˔ଵ .

Capital Workers. They are no long-

Industries er capital. They are
strangers.
constant variable surplus value They have sums of money
I ‫ܥ‬ଵ - machines ܸଵ - machines ‫ܯ‬ଵ - machines ܸଵ (money) Workers I
II ˔ଶ - food products ‫ݒ‬ଶ - money 0 0

The further exchange scheme can be as follows. Workers I buy machines. We get:

Industries Capital Workers

constant variable surplus value They have machines for the
amount of
I ‫ܥ‬ଵ - machines ܸଵ - money ‫ܯ‬ଵ - machines ܸଵ (machines) Workers I
II ˔ଶ - food ‫ݒ‬ଶ - money 0 0
products

The exchange continues

1. Workers I exchange their ‫ݒ‬ଵ (machines) for a part of food products ˔ଶ .
2. Capitalist I exchanges his surplus value ݉ଵ (machines) for a part of food products ˔ଶ .

Marx’s theorem. For the functioning of simple production, the following equality must be ful-
filled: ˔ଶ ൌ ܸଵ ൅ ‫ܯ‬ଵ
Exchange results
In- Capital Workers
dust
constant variable surplus value They have machines for the
ries
amount of
I ‫ܥ‬ଵ - machines ܸଵ – money ‫ܯ‬ଵ – food ܸଵ (food Workers I
products products)
II ˔ଶ – machines. ˔ଶ ൌ  ‫ܯ‬ଵ ൅ ܸଵ ‫ݒ‬ଶ – money 0 0

Capitalists I and workers I eat their products

In- Capital Workers. They are strangers

dust surplus value They have machines for the
ries constant variable
amount of
I ‫ܥ‬ଵ – machines ܸଵ – money 0 0
II ˔ଶ – machines. ˔ଶ ൌ  ܸଵ ൅ ‫ݒ‬ଶ – money 0 0
‫ܯ‬ଵ
 155
155

We are back to the underlying situation. A new production cycle begins.
௠
Note. Therefore, Marx’s assumption about the constancy of the organic composition of capital is
௖
unnecessary. But in the thermodynamic model, some variables must be captured in order to get the
௠
process. It seems plausible that Marx indicates a specific process, capturing the value .
௖

Conclusion. Modelling simplified the representation of Marx’s work.

§ 13.4. Criticism of Leontief model

The fundamental constant of value, the rate of profit and the constant of the organic composition of
capital are not included in Leontief model. From there, Leontief’s equations are not fundamental
equations of economics. There is a lack of logic in the economic process. Let us try to fix the weak
points of these equations using Marx’s work.

§ 13.5. Marx’s scheme of simple reproduction written in matrix form

We introduce the following notations. Let us consider a matrix ‫ܣ‬:

‫ܣ‬11 ‫ܣ‬12 ‫ܣ‬13
‫ ܣ‬ൌ ൭‫ܣ‬21 ‫ܣ‬22 ‫ܣ‬23൱
‫ܣ‬31 ‫ܣ‬32 ‫ܣ‬33
Notations of the matrix rows:
‫ܣ‬ଵ ൌ ሺ‫ܣ‬11 ‫ܣ‬12 ‫ܣ‬13ሻ
ቮ‫ܣ‬ଶ ൌ ሺ‫ܣ‬21 ‫ܣ‬22 ‫ܣ‬23ሻ
‫ܣ‬ଷ ൌ ሺ‫ܣ‬31 ‫ܣ‬32 ‫ܣ‬33ሻ

Notations of the sum of the elements of the matrix rows:

࡭૚ ൌ ෍ ‫ܣ‬ଵ ൌ ‫ܣ‬11 ൅ ‫ܣ‬12 ൅ ‫ܣ‬13

ተ
࡭૛ ൌ ෍ ‫ܣ‬ଶ ൌ ‫ܣ‬21 ൅ ‫ܣ‬22 ൅ ‫ܣ‬23
ተ
࡭૜ ൌ ෍ ‫ܣ‬ଵ ൌ ‫ܣ‬31 ൅ ‫ܣ‬32 ൅ ‫ܣ‬33

Notations of the matrix columns:

‫ܣ‬11 ‫ܣ‬12 ‫ܣ‬13

ଵ ଶ ଷ
‫ ܣ‬ൌ ൭‫ܣ‬21൱ ; ‫ ܣ‬ൌ ൭‫ܣ‬22൱ ‫ ܣ‬ൌ ൭‫ܣ‬23൱
‫ܣ‬31 ‫ܣ‬32 ‫ܣ‬31

Notations of the sum of the elements of the matrix columns:

࡭૚ ൌ ෍ ‫ܣ‬ଵ ൌ ‫ܣ‬11 ൅ ‫ܣ‬21 ൅ ‫ܣ‬31

ተ ૛
࡭ ൌ ෍ ‫ܣ‬ଶ ൌ ‫ܣ‬12 ൅ ‫ܣ‬22 ൅ ‫ܣ‬32
ተ
࡭૜ ൌ ෍ ‫ܣ‬ଷ ൌ ‫ܣ‬13 ൅ ‫ܣ‬23 ൅ ‫ܣ‬33

The sums are denoted with bold black letters. The notation of the sum of all matrix elements:
156 156

௡ ௠

࡭ ൌ ෍ ‫ ܣ‬ൌ ෍ ෍ ‫ܣ‬௜,௝
௜ୀଵ ௝ୀଵ

The start of the production. The beginning of the year.

Industries I, II and III are production of the means of production.

Industries Capital of Technological matrix Variable

industries Constant capital in the form of thing (machines, en- capital in the form
gines, materials) of money (values)
Machines Engines Materials
I ‫ܭ‬ଵ ‫ܥ‬11 ʠ12 ʠ13 ܸଵ
II ‫ܭ‬ଶ ʠ21 ʠ22 ʠ23 ܸଶ
III ‫ܭ‬ଷ ʠ31 ʠ32 ʠ33 ܸଷ

Some elements of the technological matrix can be zeros.

Notation. Machines, engines and materials are to be called things. Let us define quantitative ac-
counting of machines and engines as thing accounting. Formally, the model does not include thing
accounting; machines, engines and materials are established by values. However, it is possible to
introduce thing accounting.

The equivalence lemma.

1. Summation over matrix rows is value accounting.

2. Summation over matrix columns is equivalent to thing accounting at constant prices for
machines and materials.
The equation of state in matrix names:
1
‫ ܭ‬ൌ ‫ ܥ‬൭1൱ ൅ ܸ
1

The equation of state in matrix elements:

‫ܭ‬ଵ ʠ11 ʠ12 ʠ13 1 ܸଵ

‫ܭ‬ ܸ
൭ ଶ ൱ ൌ ൭ʠ21 ʠ22 ʠ23൱ ൭1൱ ൅ ൭ ଶ ൱
‫ܭ‬ଷ ʠ31 ʠ31 ʠ33 1 ܸଷ

Hired workers. Buying of labour power in the labour market

Industries Capital Technological matrix Variable capital The workers

of Constant capital in the form of thing in the form of sold their labour
industries workers (living power. But they
Machines Engines Materials
people) have no money
yet
I ‫ܭ‬ଵ ‫ܥ‬11 ‫ܥ‬12 ‫ܥ‬13 ܸଵ 0
II ‫ܭ‬ଶ ‫ܥ‬21 ‫ܥ‬22 ‫ܥ‬23 ܸଶ 0
III ‫ܭ‬ଷ ‫ܥ‬31 ‫ܥ‬32 ‫ܥ‬33 ܸଷ 0
 157
157

Lemma. Workers advance capitalists.
The money that workers receive at the end of the production cycle is not a wage, because its amount
is determined before production begins when the amount of labour is unknown. The money is a
payment for labour power and is formed at the labour market, not in production.
The technological matrix is to be constantly updated, in other circumstances the production process
will be impossible.
The end of the production. The end of the year.
Depreciation is one year. Old machines, engines and materials have disappeared.

Capital Constant capital in the form of ma- Variable Surplus value The workers
of chines and engines. Machines, en- capital in in the form of received
In- industri gines and materials (things) are newly the form thing money. Their
dustri es created of thing money is not
es machines engines materials capital
I ෪ଵ
‫ܭ‬ ෪
‫ܥ‬11 ෪
‫ܥ‬12 ෪
‫ܥ‬13 ܸ෩ଵ ‫ܯ‬෪ଵ ෪૚
ࢂ
II ෪ଶ
‫ܭ‬ ෪
‫ܥ‬21 ෪
‫ܥ‬22 ෪
‫ܥ‬23 ෪ଶ
ܸ ‫ܯ‬෪ଶ ෪૛
ࢂ
III ෪ଷ
‫ܭ‬ ෪
‫ܥ‬31 ෪
‫ܥ‬32 ෪
‫ܥ‬33 ෪ଷ
ܸ ‫ܯ‬෪ଷ ෪૜
ࢂ

Let us describe the variable capital and surplus value in the form of thing:
ܸ෩ଵ ෪
ܸ11 ෪
ܸ12 ෪
ܸ13 ෪ଵ
‫ܯ‬ ෫ ‫ܯ‬12
‫ܯ‬11 ෫ ‫ܯ‬13
෫
ܸ෨ ൌ ቌ෪ ෪
ܸଶ ቍ ൌ ൭ܸ21 ෪
ܸ22 ܸ23 ෩ ൌ ቌ‫ܯ‬
෪ ൱ ;‫ܯ‬ ෪ଶ ቍ ൌ ൭‫ܯ‬21
෫ ‫ܯ‬22
෫ ‫ܯ‬23
෫ ൱.
෪
ܸଷ ෪
ܸ31 ෪
ܸ32 ෪
ܸ33 ෪ଷ
‫ܯ‬ ෫ ෫ ෫
‫ܯ‬31 ‫ܯ‬32 ‫ܯ‬33

The value equation of state in matrix names:

1
෩ ൌ ൫‫ܥ‬ሚ ൅ ܸ෨ ൅ ‫ܯ‬
‫ܭ‬ ෩ ൯ ൭1൱.
1
The thing equation of state in matrix names:
Machines ்
൭ Engines ൱ ൌ  ቀሺ1 1 1ሻ൫‫ܥ‬ሚ ൅ ܸ෨ ൅ ‫ܯ‬ ෩ ൯ቁ
Materials
The system of equations of state in two equivalent forms: value and thing:
1
‫ܭ‬෩ ൌ ൫‫ܥ‬ሚ ൅ ܸ෨ ൅ ‫ܯ‬෩ ൯ ൭1൱~
ተ 1
ተ Machines ்
൭ Engines ൱ ൌ  ቀሺ1 1 1ሻ൫‫ܥ‬ሚ ൅ ܸ෨ ൅ ‫ܯ‬ ෩ ൯ቁ 
Materials
The system of equations of state in two equivalent forms: value and thing:
valueequationofstate~
ฬ
thingequationofstate
158 158

෪ଵ
‫ܭ‬ ෪ ‫ܥ‬12
‫ܥ‬11 ෪ ‫ܥ‬13 ෪ ෪ ܸ12
ܸ11 ෪ ܸ13 ෪ ෫ ‫ܯ‬12
‫ܯ‬11 ෫ ‫ܯ‬13 ෫ 1
෪ ෪ ෪ ෪ ෪ ෪ ෪ ෫ ෫ ෫
ተ ቌ‫ܭ‬ଶ ቍ ൌ ቌ൭‫ܥ‬21 ‫ܥ‬22 ‫ܥ‬23൱ ൅ ൭ܸ21 ܸ22 ܸ23൱ ൅ ൭‫ܯ‬21 ‫ܯ‬22 ‫ܯ‬23൱ቍ ൭1൱
෪ଷ
‫ܭ‬ ෪ ‫ܥ‬32
‫ܥ‬31 ෪ ‫ܥ‬33 ෪ ෪ ܸ32
ܸ31 ෪ ܸ33 ෪ ෫ ‫ܯ‬32
‫ܯ‬31 ෫ ‫ܯ‬33 ෫ 1
Machines
ተ ൭ Engines ൱  ൌ
Materials
்
෪ ‫ܥ‬12
‫ܥ‬11 ෪ ‫ܥ‬13
෪ ෪ ܸ12
ܸ11 ෪ ܸ13
෪ ෫ ‫ܯ‬12
‫ܯ‬11 ෫ ‫ܯ‬13
෫
ተൌ ൮ሺ1 1 ෪ ‫ܥ‬22
1ሻ ቌ൭‫ܥ‬21 ෪ ‫ܥ‬23
෪ ൱ ൅ ൭ܸ21
෪ ܸ22
෪ ܸ23
෪ ൱ ൅ ൭‫ܯ‬21
෫ ‫ܯ‬22
෫ ‫ܯ‬23
෫ ൱ቍ൲
෪ ‫ܥ‬32
‫ܥ‬31 ෪ ‫ܥ‬33
෪ ෪ ܸ32
ܸ31 ෪ ܸ33
෪ ෫ ‫ܯ‬32
‫ܯ‬31 ෫ ‫ܯ‬33
෫

Quantitative exchange of constant capital between industries I, II, III

The industries have created new machines, engines and materials. The exchange of machines, en-
gines and materials begins.
The leading question. Is there an exchange, at which the technological matrix will be renewed?
Theorem. An exchange, at which the technological matrix will be renewed exists.
Proof.

Quantitative accounting
Technological matrix Newly created machines, en-
gines and materials
‫ܥ‬11 ‫ܥ‬12 ‫ܥ‬12 ෪ ‫ܥ‬12
‫ܥ‬11 ෪ ‫ܥ‬13 ෪
൭‫ܥ‬21 ‫ܥ‬22 ‫ܥ‬23൱ ෪ ෪
൭‫ܥ‬21 ‫ܥ‬22 ‫ܥ‬23 ෪൱
‫ܥ‬31 ‫ܥ‬32 ‫ܥ‬32 ෪ ‫ܥ‬32
‫ܥ‬31 ෪ ‫ܥ‬33 ෪

We consider these matrices in terms of value, not quantity. The sums of values row- and column-
wise are the same for both matrices. Let us consider the difference between matrices:
‫ܥ‬ሚ െ ‫ ܥ‬ൌ ܼ
෪ ‫ܥ‬12
‫ܥ‬11 ෪ ‫ܥ‬13
෪ ‫ܥ‬11 ‫ܥ‬12 ‫ܥ‬12 ܼ11 ܼ12 ܼ12
෪ ‫ܥ‬22
൭‫ܥ‬21 ෪ ‫ܥ‬23
෪ ൱ െ ൭‫ܥ‬21 ‫ܥ‬22 ‫ܥ‬23൱ ൌ ൭ܼ21 ܼ22 ܼ23൱ ൌ ܼ
෪ ‫ܥ‬32
‫ܥ‬31 ෪ ‫ܥ‬33
෪ ‫ܥ‬31 ‫ܥ‬32 ‫ܥ‬32 ܼ31 ܼ32 ܼ32

Lemma 2. Matrix ܼis not a symmetric matrix.

Lemma 3. Matrix ܼ row- and column-wise has zeros.
Lemma 4. Matrix ܼ is an exchange matrix that renews the technological matrix.

Let us demonstrate the proof with a numerical example. The matrix ܼ is as follows:

ܼ11 ܼ12 ܼ12 100 70 െ170

ܼ ൌ ൭ܼ21 ܼ22 ܼ23൱ ൌ  ൭െ150 20 130 ൱
ܼ31 ܼ32 ܼ32 50 െ90 40
By rows and columns, the matrix ܼ has zeros.

Machines Engines Materials

Industry I 100 70 -170
Industry II -150 20 130
Industry III 50 -90 40
 159
159

Exchange of machines
We consider the 1st column of the matrix ܼ:

Machines Exchange of machines

Industry I 100 ෪ െ ‫ܥ‬11 ൌ 100
ܼ11 ൌ ‫ܥ‬11
Industry II -150 ෪ െ ‫ܥ‬21 ൌ െ150
ܼ21 ൌ ‫ܥ‬21
Industry III 50 ෪ െ ‫ܥ‬31 ൌ 50
ܼ31 ൌ ‫ܥ‬31

It can be seen that 100 excess machines were produced by industry I. Industry II produced 150 few-
er machines than it needed. Industry III produced 50 excess machines. Consequently, the value can
be transferred from industries I and III to the industry II: 50 + 100 = 150 values. The value ex-
change was made. We only exchange machines for machines, not for engines or materials.

It means that we can apply the equivalence lemma, whereunder value exchange is equivalent to
quantitative exchange. From there, industry II receives enough machines to renew the technology
matrix. The same exchange between industries can be performed individually both for machines
and materials.

Results. The exchange between industries is made. The technological matrix ‫ܥ‬is renewed.
The exchange was equivalent. Nobody stood to gain from the exchange, as well as nobody got the
short end of the stick. The results are reviewed at the end of the exchange; provisional monetary
results are not summed up. And therefore, the exchange matrix is not to be symmetrical. Summing
up the monetary results at the end of the exchange simplifies the model.
The end of the production. The end of the year. Technological matrix is renewed.

Capital Constant capital in the form of thing. Variable Surplus val- The workers
of in- Machines, engines and materials are capital in ue in the receive mon-
Indus- dustrie newly created the form form of ma- ey. Their
tries s of ma- chines and money is not
Machines Engines Materials chines engines capital
I ෪
‫ܭ‬1 ‫ܥ‬11 ‫ܥ‬12 ‫ܥ‬13 ܸ෩ଵ ෪ଵ
‫ܯ‬ ෪૚
ࢂ
II ෪
‫ܭ‬2 ‫ܥ‬21 ‫ܥ‬22 ‫ܥ‬23 ෪ଶ
ܸ ෪ଶ
‫ܯ‬ ෪૛
ࢂ
III ෪
‫ܭ‬3 ‫ܥ‬31 ‫ܥ‬32 ‫ܥ‬33 ෪ଷ
ܸ ෪ଷ
‫ܯ‬ ෪૜
ࢂ

The value system of equations of state becomes:

෪ଵ
‫ܭ‬ ‫ܥ‬11 ‫ܥ‬12 ‫ܥ‬13 ෪ ܸ12
ܸ11 ෪ ෪
ܸ13 ෫ ‫ܯ‬12
‫ܯ‬11 ෫ ‫ܯ‬13
෫ 1
෪ଶ ቍ ൌ ቌ൭‫ܥ‬21
ቌ‫ܭ‬ ‫ܥ‬22 ෪ ܸ22
‫ܥ‬23൱ ൅ ൭ܸ21 ෪ ෪ ൱ ൅ ൭‫ܯ‬21
ܸ23 ෫ ‫ܯ‬22
෫ ‫ܯ‬23
෫ ൱ቍ ൭1൱
෪ଷ
‫ܭ‬ ‫ܥ‬31 ‫ܥ‬31 ‫ܥ‬33 ෪ ෪
ܸ31 ܸ32 ෪
ܸ33 ෫ ‫ܯ‬32
‫ܯ‬31 ෫ ‫ܯ‬33
෫ 1

The start of the production. The beginning of the year.

Industries IV and V are the production of the means of consumption.

Capital of Constant capital in the form of thing Variable capital in the

Industries industries Machines Engines Materials form of money
(values)
IV ݇ଵ ܿ11 ܿ12 ܿ13 ‫ݒ‬ଵ
160 160

V ݇ଶ ܿ21 ܿ22 ܿ23 ‫ݒ‬ଶ

The beginning of the year. Hired workers. Purchase of labour in the labour market.

Indus- Capital Technological matrix Variable capital in Workers sold

tries of indus- Constant capital in the form of thing the form of work- their labour
tries ers (living people) force
Machines Engines Materials
IV ݇ଵ ܿ11 ܿ12 ܿ13 ‫ݒ‬ଵ 0
V ݇ଶ ܿ21 ܿ22 ܿ23 ‫ݒ‬ଶ 0

The end of the production. The end of the year

One year of depreciation. Old machines, engines and materials have disappeared.
Products were made.

Indus- Capital Constant capital in the form Variable cap- Surplus value The workers re-
tries of indus- of food products ital in the in the form of ceived money.
tries Bread Meat Milk Wine form of food food products Workers and their
products money are not
capital
IV ෪ଵ
݇ ෪
ܿ11 ෪
ܿ12 ෪
ܿ13 ෪
ܿ14 ‫ݒ‬
෦ଵ ݉
෦ଵ ‫ܞ‬૚
V ෪ଶ
݇ ෪
ܿ21 ෪
ܿ22 ෪
ܿ23 ෪
ܿ24 ‫ݒ‬෦ଶ ݉
෦ଶ ‫ܞ‬૛

In the consumption industry, the capitalists eat their surplus value. Workers buy food from the capi-
talists and eat it. The money is returned to the capitalists and becomes capital again.
The end of the year. Industries IV and V are the production of the means of consumption.
After consumption.

Indus- Capital Constant capital in the form of Variable capital in the Surplus There
tries of indus- food products form of money for the value are no
tries Bread Meat Milk Wine next production cycle workers
IV ݇ଵ ෪
ܿ11 ෪
ܿ12 ෪
ܿ13 ෪
ܿ14 ‫ݒ‬ଵ 0 0
V ݇ଶ ෪
ܿ21 ෪
ܿ22 ෪
ܿ23 ෪
ܿ24 ‫ݒ‬ଶ 0 0
Total ݇ ܿ෩ଵ ܿ෪ଶ ܿ෪ଷ ܿ෪ସ 0 0 0

The system of equations of state after consumption in two semi-equivalent forms: value and thing:
1
݇ଵ ෪ ܿ12
ܿ11 ෪ ܿ13෪ ܿ14෪ ‫ݒ‬ଵ
ተ ൬ ൰ ൌ ൭൬ ൰൱ ቌ1ቍ ൅ ቀ‫ ݒ‬ቁ
݇ଵ ෪ ܿ22
ܿ21 ෪ ܿ23෪ ܿ24෪ 1 ଶ
1
Bread ෪ ܿ21
ܿ11 ෪ 1
Meat ෪ ܿ22
ܿ12 ෪ 1 ෪ ܿ12
ܿ11 ෪ ܿ13෪ ܿ14 ෪
ተ൮ ൲ൌ൮ ൲ ቀ ቁ ~൭൬ ൰൱ ቌ1ቍ
Milk ෪ ෪
ܿ13 ܿ23 1 ෪ ෪
ܿ21 ܿ22 ܿ23෪ ܿ24 ෪ 1
Beer ෪ ܿ24
ܿ14 ෪ 1

Variable capital is returned to the capitalists in the form of money, which has served its purpose in
the current production cycle. Therefore, we leave money out of account in the thing equation of the
state.
 161
161

The production cycle is completed when the capitalists of the production of the means of consump-
tion exchange constant capital in the form of food products for machines, engines, materials.

Industries I, II and III are production of the means of production. Consumption matrix.

The workers-molecules must have the same consumption and the same consumption pattern. The
capitalists-molecules must have the same consumption and the same consumption pattern. But the
consumption of the capitalists-molecules is distinct from the consumption of the workers-molecules
in the consumption pattern and the consumptionquantity.
At the moment, we do not tackle the issue of people’s equality. What is critically important for us is
to make production consistent with consumption. Let us assume that people’s consumption is dif-
ferent.

We define the consumption matrix of workers:

Industries Bread Meat Milk Beer

Means of Industry I Worker I ෫
ܹ11 ෫
ܹ12 ෫
ܹ13 ෫
ܹ14
production Industry II Worker II ෫
ܹ21 ෫
ܹ22 ෫
ܹ23 ෫
ܹ24
Industry III Worker III ෫
ܹ31 ෫
ܹ32 ෫
ܹ33 ෫
ܹ34

We define the consumption matrix of capitalists:

Bread Meat Milk Beer

Means of Industry I Capitalist I ෪
‫ܤ‬11 ෪
‫ܤ‬12 ෪
‫ܤ‬13 ෪
‫ܤ‬14
production Industry II Capitalist II ෪
‫ܤ‬21 ෪
‫ܤ‬22 ෪
‫ܤ‬23 ෪
‫ܤ‬24
Industry III Capitalist III ෪
‫ܤ‬11 ෫
‫ܯ‬11 ෫
‫ܯ‬11 ෫
‫ܯ‬11

The value equation of state:

෪ଵ
‫ܭ‬ ‫ܥ‬11 ‫ܥ‬12 ‫ܥ‬13 1 ෪
ܸ11 ෪ ܸ13
ܸ12 ෪ 1 ෫
‫ܯ‬11 ෫ ‫ܯ‬13
‫ܯ‬12 ෫ 1
෪ଶ ቍ ൌ ൭‫ܥ‬21
ቌ‫ܭ‬ ‫ܥ‬22 ෪
‫ܥ‬23൱ ൭1൱ ൅ ൭ܸ21 ෪ ܸ23
ܸ22 ෪ ൱ ൭1൱ ൅ ൭‫ܯ‬21
෫ ෫ ‫ܯ‬23
‫ܯ‬22 ෫ ൱ ൭1൱
෪ଷ
‫ܭ‬ ‫ܥ‬31 ‫ܥ‬32 ‫ܥ‬33 1 ෪
ܸ31 ෪ ෪
ܸ32 ܸ33 1 ෫
‫ܯ‬31 ෫ ෫ 1
‫ܯ‬32 ‫ܯ‬33

Lemma. For industries IV and V, the condition for the value equivalence equation of constant capi-
tal in machines and food products is as follows:

1 1
ܿ11 ܿ12 ܿ13 ෪ ܿ12
ܿ11 ෪ ܿ13
෪ ܿ14
෪
ቀ ቁ ൭1൱ ൌ ൬ ൰ ቌ1ቍ
ܿ21 ܿ22 ܿ23 ෪ ෪ ෪ ܿ24
ܿ21 ܿ22 ܿ23 ෪ 1
1 1
Equations of state of simple production:
162 162

෪ଵ
‫ܭ‬ ෪ ܸ12
ܸ11 ෪ ܸ13 ෪ ෫ ‫ܯ‬12
‫ܯ‬11 ෫ ‫ܯ‬13 ෫ 1
෪ ෪ ෪ ෪ ෫ ෫ ෫
ተ ቌ‫ܭ‬ଶ ቍ ൌ ቌ‫ ܥ‬൅ ൭ܸ21 ܸ22 ܸ23൱ ൅ ൭‫ܯ‬21 ‫ܯ‬22 ‫ܯ‬23൱ቍ ൭1൱
෪ଷ
‫ܭ‬ ෪ ܸ32
ܸ31 ෪ ܸ33 ෪ ෫ ‫ܯ‬32
‫ܯ‬31 ෫ ‫ܯ‬33 ෫ 1
Machines
ተ ൭ Engines ൱  ൌ
Materials
்
෪ ܸ12
ܸ11 ෪ ܸ13
෪ ෫ ‫ܯ‬12
‫ܯ‬11 ෫ ‫ܯ‬13
෫
ተൌ ൮ሺ1 1 ෪ ܸ22
1ሻ ቌ‫ ܥ‬൅ ൭ܸ21 ෪ ܸ23
෪ ൱ ൅ ൭‫ܯ‬21
෫ ‫ܯ‬22
෫ ‫ܯ‬23
෫ ൱ቍ൲ 
෪ ܸ32
ܸ31 ෪ ܸ33
෪ ෫ ‫ܯ‬32
‫ܯ‬31 ෫ ‫ܯ‬33
෫

1
݇ଵ ෪
ܿ11 ෪ ܿ13
ܿ12 ෪ ܿ14෪ ‫ݒ‬ଵ
ተ ൬݇ଵ ൰ ൌ ൭൬ܿ21 ൰൱ ቌ1ቍ ൅ ቀ‫ ݒ‬ቁ
෪ ෪ ܿ23
ܿ22 ෪ ܿ24෪ 1 ଶ
1
ተ Bread ෪ ܿ21
ܿ11 ෪
Meat ෪ ෪ 1
൮ ൲ ൌ ൮ܿ12 ܿ22൲ ቀ ቁ
Milk ෪ ෪
ܿ13 ܿ23 1
ተ Beer ෪ ܿ24෪
 ܿ14 
1 1
ተ ቀܿ11 ܿ12 ܿ13ቁ ൭1൱ ൌ ൬ܿ11෪ ܿ12෪ ܿ13 ෪ ܿ14 ෪
൰ ቌ1ቍ
ܿ21 ܿ22 ܿ23 ෪ ܿ22
ܿ21 ෪ ܿ23 ෪ ܿ24 ෪ 1
1 1

Theorem. The following system of equations is to be fulfilled for the operation of simple reproduc-
tion:
෪ ܸ12
ܸ11 ෪ ܸ13
෪ ෫ ‫ܯ‬12
‫ܯ‬11 ෫ ‫ܯ‬13
෫
ܿ11 ܿ12 ܿ13 ෪ ܸ22
෪ ܸ23
෪ ൱ ൅ ൭‫ܯ‬21
෫ ‫ܯ‬22
෫ ‫ܯ‬23
෫ ൱ቍ
ሺ1 1ሻ ቀ ቁ ൌ ሺ1 1 1ሻ ቌ൭ܸ21
ܿ21 ܿ22 ܿ23
෪ ܸ32
ܸ31 ෪ ܸ33
෪ ෫ ‫ܯ‬32
‫ܯ‬31 ෫ ‫ܯ‬33
෫

෪
ܿ11 ෪
ܿ21 ෪ ‫ܤ‬21
‫ܤ‬11 ෪ ‫ܤ‬31
෪ ෫
ܹ11 ෫
ܹ21 ෫
ܹ31
෪ ෪ 1 ‫ ۇ‬෪ ෪ ෪ ෫ ෫ ෫ ‫ ۊ‬1
൮ܿ12 ܿ22 ൲ ቀ ቁ ൌ ‫ۈ‬൮‫ܤ‬12 ‫ܤ‬22 ‫ܤ‬32൲ ൅ ൮ܹ12 ܹ22 ܹ32 ൲ ൭ ൱
෪
ܿ13 ෪
ܿ23 1 ෪ ෪ ෪
‫ܤ‬13 ‫ܤ‬23 ‫ܤ‬33 ෫
ܹ13 ෫
ܹ23 ෫ ‫ ۋ‬1
ܹ33 1
෪
ܿ14 ෪
ܿ24 ෪ ‫ܤ‬24
‫ܤ‬14 ෪
෪ ‫ܤ‬34 ෫
ܹ14 ෫
ܹ24 ෫
ܹ34
‫ۉ‬ ‫ی‬

1 1
ܿ11 ܿ12 ܿ13 ෪ ܿ12
ܿ11 ෪ ܿ13
෪ ܿ14
෪
ቀ ቁ ൭1൱ ൌ ൬ ൰ ቌ1ቍ
ܿ21 ܿ22 ܿ23 ෪ ෪ ෪ ܿ24
ܿ21 ܿ22 ܿ23 ෪ 1
1 1

෪ ܸ12
෪ ෪ ෫ ܹ12
ܹ11 ෫ ܹ13
෫ ܹ14
෫ 1
ܸ11 ܸ13 1
෪ ෪ ෫ ܹ22
෪ ൱ ൭1൱ ൌ ቌܹ21 ෫ ܹ23 1
൭ܸ21 ܸ22 ܸ23 ෫ቍ ൮ ൲
෫ ܹ24
1
෪ ܸ32
ܸ31 ෪ ෪
ܸ33 1 ෫ ܹ32
ܹ31 ෫ ܹ33
෫ ܹ34
෫ 1

෫ ‫ܯ‬12
෫ ‫ܯ‬13
෫ 1 ෪ ‫ܤ‬12
‫ܤ‬11 ෪ ෪ ‫ܤ‬14
෪ 1
‫ܯ‬11 ‫ܤ‬13
෫ ‫ܯ‬22
෫ ‫ܯ‬23 ෪ ‫ܤ‬22
෫ ൱ ൭1൱ ൌ ቌ‫ܤ‬21 ෪ 1
൭‫ܯ‬21 ෪ ቍ൮ ൲
෪ ‫ܤ‬24
‫ܤ‬23 1
෫ ෫ ෫
‫ܯ‬31 ‫ܯ‬32 ‫ܯ‬33 1 ෪ ‫ܤ‬32
‫ܤ‬31 ෪ ෪ ‫ܤ‬34
‫ܤ‬33 ෪ 1
 163
163

Proof.
The 1st equation is a condition for the thing renewal of the technological matrix for industries IV
and V:
෪
ܸ11 ෪ ܸ13
ܸ12 ෪ ෫ ‫ܯ‬12
‫ܯ‬11 ෫ ‫ܯ‬13
෫
ܿ11 ܿ12 ܿ13 ෪ ෪ ෪ ෫ ෫ ෫ ൱ቍ
ሺ1 1ሻ ቀ ቁ ൌ ሺ1 1 1ሻ ቌ൭ܸ21 ൅
ܸ22 ܸ23൱ ൭‫ܯ‬21 ‫ܯ‬22 ‫ܯ‬23
ܿ21 ܿ22 ܿ23
෪
ܸ31 ෪ ܸ33
ܸ32 ෪ ෫ ‫ܯ‬32
‫ܯ‬31 ෫ ‫ܯ‬33
෫

In this equation, industries I, II and III sell their variable capital and surplus value to industries IV
and V.
Lemma. The technological matrix of industries IV and V will be renewed.
Proof. The first columns of the equation describe the sale of machines. We obtain:

෪
ܸ11
ܿ11 ෪ ൱
ሺ1 1ሻ ቀ ቁ ൌ ሺ1 1 1ሻ ൭ܸ21
ተ ܿ21
෪
ܸ31
෪ ൅ ܸ21
˔11 ൅ ˔21 ൌ ܸ11 ෪ ൅ ܸ31
෪ 

෪ ൅ ܸ21
Industries I, II and III supplied the required total number of machines : ܸ11 ෪ ൅ ܸ31෪.
Industries IV and V divided the total value in the ratio of ˔11: ܿ21. The same goes for engines and
materials.
Results. The technological matrix of industries IV and V has been renewed in the form of thing.
The 2nd equation is the sale of constant capital in the form of food products to industries I, II and III:
෪
ܿ11 ෪
ܿ21 ෪ ‫ܤ‬21
‫ܤ‬11 ෪ ‫ܤ‬31
෪ ෫
ܹ11 ෫
ܹ21 ෫
ܹ31
෪ ෪ 1 ‫ ۇ‬෪ ෪ ෪ ෫ ෫ ෫ ‫ ۊ‬1
൮ܿ12 ܿ22൲ ቀ ቁ ൌ ‫ۈ‬൮‫ܤ‬12 ‫ܤ‬22 ‫ܤ‬32൲ ൅ ൮ܹ12 ܹ22 ܹ32 ൲ ൭ ൱
෪
ܿ13 ෪
ܿ23 1 ෪ ෪ ෪
‫ܤ‬13 ‫ܤ‬23 ‫ܤ‬33 ෫
ܹ13 ෫
ܹ23 ෫ ‫ ۋ‬1
ܹ33 1
෪
ܿ14 ෪
ܿ24 ෪ ‫ܤ‬24
‫ܤ‬14 ෪
෪ ‫ܤ‬34 ෫
ܹ14 ෫
ܹ24 ෫
ܹ34
‫ۉ‬ ‫ی‬

Lemma. Selling food products is a real sale.

The first lines describe the sale of bread. We obtain:
1
෪
ሺܿ11 ෪ ሻ ቀ1ቁ ൌ ൫ሺ‫ܤ‬11
ܿ21 ෪ ෪ ‫ܤ‬31
‫ܤ‬21 ෪ ሻ ൅ ሺܹ11
෫
෫ ෫
ܹ21 ܹ31 ሻ൯ ൭ 1൱
ተ 1
1
෪ ൅ ‫ܤ‬21
˔11 ൅ ˔21 ൌ ൫‫ܤ‬11 ෪ ൅ ‫ܤ‬31
෪ ൯ ൅  ൫ܹ11
෫ ൅ ܹ21
෫ ൅ ܹ31
෫ ൯

We sold actual bread. The same goes for meat, milk and beer.
Conclusion. The sale is real.
Lemma. The exchange of machines, engines and materials for food products is an equivalent value
exchange.
Proof. Let us consider the 1st line of the equation:

෪ ܸ12
෪ ܸ13
෪ ෫ ܹ12
ܹ11 ෫ ܹ13
෫ ܹ14
෫ 1
ܸ11 1
෪ ܸ22
෪ ܸ23 ෫ ܹ22
෪ ൱ ൭1൱ ൌ ቌܹ21 ෫ ܹ23 1
൭ܸ21 ෫ቍ ൮ ൲
෫ ܹ24
1
෪ ܸ32
ܸ31 ෪ ܸ33
෪ 1 ෫ ܹ32
ܹ31 ෫ ܹ33
෫ ܹ34
෫ 1
We obtain:

164 164

1
1
෪
ተሺܸ11 ܸ12 ෫ ܹ21
෪ ሻ ቆ1ቇ ൌ ሺܹ11
෪ ܸ13 ෫ ෫ ܹ14
ܹ13 ෫ ሻ ቌ1ቍ
1
1
ተ 1
෪ ൅ ܸ12
ܸ11 ෪ ൅ ܸ13
෪ ൌ  ܹ11
෫ ൅ ܹ12 ෫ ൅ ܹ13 ෫ ൅ ܹ14
෫ 


The industry I exchanged its machines for food products. This exchange was equivalent
since the industry I received the same variable capital that it had. At this point, the variable capital
is in the form of food products, which can be sold to the workers. The same goes for industries II,
III and for the exchange of surplus value for food products.

We consider the 3rd equation:

1 1
ܿ11 ܿ12 ܿ13 ෪ ܿ12
ܿ11 ෪ ܿ13
෪ ܿ14
෪
ቀ ቁ ൭1൱ ൌ ൬ ൰ ቌ1ቍ
ܿ21 ܿ22 ܿ23 ෪ ෪
ܿ21 ܿ22 ܿ23 ෪ ܿ24
෪ 1
1 1
The 1st line of this equation is as follows:
1
1
ተሺܿ11 ܿ12 ܿ13ሻ ቆ1ቇ ൌ ሺܿ11 ෪ ܿ21 ෪ ܿ13 ෪ ሻ ቌ1ቍ
෪ ܿ14
1
1
ተ 1
෪ ෪ ෪ ෪
ܿ11 ൅ ܿ12 ൅ ܿ13 ൌ  ܿ11 ൅ ܿ12 ൅ ܿ13 ൅ ܿ14


On the left, there are machines bought by industry IV, on the right – food products sold by
industry IV. Equality means that the exchange was equivalent. The same goes for industry V.
In Marx’s scheme, the constant capital of industries IV and V is exchanged for variable capi-
tal and the surplus value of industries I, II and III. This scheme remains the same if there are several
industries. However, we need to add the conditions for the thing exchange and the technological
matrix reproduction. Why is everything complicated?

Lemma. Generally, the exchange matrix is three-dimensional. That is why it is impossible to

present the exchange in the form of two-dimensional matrices.
Proof. Industries produced variable capital to exchange it for food products.

Industries Variable capital to exchange for food products

Machines Engines Materials
Industry I ෪
ܸ11 ෪
ܸ12 ෪
ܸ13
Industry II ෪
ܸ21 ෪
ܸ22 ෪
ܸ23
Industry III ෪
ܸ31 ෪
ܸ32 ෪
ܸ33

Let the industry I exchange its machines, engines and materials for food products.
The exchange matrix for industry I is as follows:

Industry‫ܸܫ‬ ܽ11 ܽ12 ܽ13

൬ ൰ൌቀ ቁ
Industryܸ ܽ21 ܽ22 ܽ23
ተ ෪
ܸ11 ܽ11 ൅ ܽ21 
ተ
෪
൭ܸ12൱ ൌ ൭ܽ12 ൅ ܽ22൱
෪
ܸ13 ܽ13 ൅ ܽ23
 165
165

A similar matrix is to be created for industries II and III. At that point, the general exchange
matrix will be three-dimensional. Its elements will have three indices.
Lemma. In the general case, the matrix of the value transfers from the old constant capital to
the new one is three-dimensional.
Is it possible to simplify the model? All workers can be considered identical molecules with
a fixed consumption. The same goes for capitalists.
Question. Why were the authors able to make a shift without three-dimensional matrices?
Answer. The authors introduced collective exchange. But all the same, the theorems need
further simplification and schematization. We should not model Marx’s CAPITAL with no univer-
sal schematization.

What are Marx’s next steps?

1. Consideration of the extended reproduction model;

2. Introduction of money circulation into this model;
3. Introduction of banks into the model;
4. Introduction of stocks into the model;
5. Introduction of class models etc.

Marx obtained all the necessary formulas and studied the logic of processes.

§ 13.6. Marx’s scheme of simple reproduction adjusted for the number of workers

Political economic meaning of the universal fundamental constant of value.

All calculations are conditional.

Lemma. Fundamental constant of value ‫݌‬is equal to the new value created by the worker in 1 la-
bour hour.
An approximate calculation of the fundamentally constant for the U.S. is performed. We obtain:
gramofgold
‫ ݌‬ൌ 2.55
labourhour
Let us assume that the gold price is 50 dollars per gram. Let the average labour price in the U.S. be:

dollars gramofgold
‫ ݒ‬ൌ 20 ൌ 0.4
labourhour labourhour
Lemma. The surplus value produced by an American worker in 1 labour hour is calculated using
Marx’s formula:
gramofgold
‫ ݌‬ൌ ݉ ൅ ‫ ݉ ֜ ݒ‬ൌ ‫ ݌‬െ ‫ ݒ‬ൌ 2.55 െ 0.4 ൌ 2.15
labourhour

Notation Variable Value Measurement unit

‫݌‬ The fundamental constant of value 2.55 gramofgold
in the U.S. labourhour
݀ Annual labour hours in the U.S. 1780 Labour hour
‫݀݌‬ New value created by one worker 2.55 ‫ כ‬1780 ൌ 4539 Gram of gold
‫ݏ‬ Gold price 50 dollar
gramofgold
ߠ Hourly price of labour power in the 20
166 166

U.S. Average hourly wage in the dollar
U.S. (in dollars) labourhour
ߠ Hourly price of labour power (in 20 gramofgold
ൌ 0.4
gold) 50 labourhour
݀ߠ Annual price of labour power (in 1780 ‫ כ‬0.4 ൌ 712 Gram of gold
gold)
Annual price of labour power (in 1780 ‫ כ‬20 ൌ 35600 Dollar
dollars)
‫ ݌‬െ ߠ Surplus value per labour hour (in 2.55 െ 0.4 ൌ 2.15 gramofgold
gold) labourhour
ሺ‫ ݌‬െ ߠሻ݀ Annual surplus value (in gold) 2.15 ‫ כ‬1780 ൌ 3827 Gram of gold

From there, the average American produces 4,539 kg of gold per year and receives 0.712 kg of
gold.

Let us introduce the number of workers into the scheme of simple production.

Industries I, II and III are production of means of production. The end of the year.
All values and prices are in grams of gold.

In- Cap Constant capital in the form of Variable Surplus value in a Numbe The work-
dust ital thing. Machines, engines and ma- capital form of thing r of ers receive
ries of terials are newly created in a worker money.
in- form of s Their mon-
dust Machines Engines Materi- thing ey is not
ries als capital
I ‫ܭ‬෪ଵ ෪
‫ܥ‬11 ෪
‫ܥ‬12 ෪
‫ܥ‬13 ܸ෩ଵ ෪ଵ ൌ ሺ‫ ݌‬െ ߠሻܰଵ ݀
‫ܯ‬ ܰଵ ෪૚ ൌ ࡺ૚ ࢊ
ࢂ
II ෪ଶ
‫ܭ‬ ෪
‫ܥ‬21 ෪
‫ܥ‬22 ෪
‫ܥ‬23 ෪
ܸଶ ෪ଶ ൌ ሺ‫ ݌‬െ ߠሻܰଶ ݀
‫ܯ‬ ܰଶ ෪૛ ൌ ࡺ૛ ࢊ
ࢂ
III ෪ଷ
‫ܭ‬ ෪
‫ܥ‬31 ෪
‫ܥ‬32 ෪
‫ܥ‬33 ෪
ܸଷ ෪ଷ ൌ ሺ‫ ݌‬െ ߠሻܰଷ ݀
‫ܯ‬ ܰଷ ෪૜ ൌ ࡺ૜ ࢊ
ࢂ

The same changes will be made in industries IV and V.

§ 13.7. Modeling simple reproduction according to Marx’s scheme

Icons Meaning of icons

Capital in the form of things, machines, engines, and materi-
als

Variable capital in the form of money

Newly created capital in the form of things, machine, en-

gines, and materials
 167
167

Variable capital in the form of workers, living people

Production process

Newly created capital in the form of food products

Industries I, II, III are production of means of production.

Step 1. Purchase of labour-power. Workers sell their commodities (their labour-power), but they do
not get money. The workers advance the capitalists. Variable capital changes its shape. Variable
capital takes the form of living people, living workers.

Step 2. Production. Variable capital takes the form of living people, living workers.
Depreciation. Old machines disappear and the old technology matrix is gone. Workers create new
machines. New constant capital, new variable capital, and new surplus value have the thing form.
They exist in the form of new machines, engines, and materials. The workers transfer the old value
of constant capital to the new constant capital. The value of constant capital is not created, but
transferred. Workers create new value: variable capital and surplus value.

Step 3. There is exchange of old constant capital for new constant capital. Industries I, II, III ex-
change elements of constant capital among themselves. Exchange is equivalent. Nobody wins, no-
body loses. Technological matrix is resumed.
168 168


Step 4. Payment of money to workers for the commodity (labour power). The technological matrix
is resumed. The workers get money.

Industries IV and V are production of consumer products.

Step 1. Purchase of labour-power. Workers sell their commodities (their labour-power), but they do
not get money. The workers advance the capitalists. Variable capital changes its shape. Variable
capital takes the form of living people, living workers.

Step 2. Production. Variable capital takes the form of living people, living workers.
Depreciation. Old machines disappear and the old technology matrix is gone. Workers create con-
sumer products.
New constant capital, variable capital, and surplus value are in the form of food products. The
workers do not create the value of the new constant capital. They transfer the value of new constant
capital from machines, engines, materials to constant capital in the form of food products. Workers
create new value: new variable capital and surplus value.
 169
169


Step 3. Consumption. The capitalists eat their surplus value. Workers get money for a commodity
(labour-power). This money is not capital in the hands of the workers, because the workers ex-
change money for food products. Workers eat food, and money returns to the capitalists and turns
into variable capital again.

IndustriesI, II, III are production of means of production. Variable capital and surplus value exist in
the form of machines, engines, and materials.

IndustriesIV and V are production of consumer products. The constant capital exists in the form of
food products. There is no more variable capital in this production cycle. The variable capital exists
in the money form, but it is intended for the next cycle of production, which is the last for it.

Marx’s theorem on simple production.

The value theorem. It is necessary and sufficient to fulfill equality in value form for the functioning
of simple production in value form:
170 170

The thing theorem. It is necessary and sufficient to fulfill equality in thing form for the functioning
of simple production in thing form:

The results of the exchange according to Marx’s theorem.

Industries IV and V are production of consumer products. As a result of the exchange, they receive
the necessary machines, engines, and materials. The technological matrix of these industries is re-
sumed. The production cycle ends and they are ready for a new cycle.
Industries I, II, III are production of means of production. As a result of exchange, the capitalists
exchange surplus value in the form of machines for surplus value in the form of food products and
eat it.
They also exchange variable capital in the form of machines for variable capital in the form of food
products. Workers buy food and money in the form of variable capital returns to the capitalists of
industries I, II, III. The production cycle ends and they are ready for a new cycle.
The contradiction of the model. The capitalist has variable capital in the form of money ܸ. He buys
labour power in the amount of ܸ. This means that the capitalist temporarily has a variable capital
equal to 2ܸ. But then the results of all calculations change. What should we do then?
We assume that the production process is continuous. Money is received and spent in small por-
tions. There is no contradiction in the continuous model.
However the continuous model is described by differential equations and it is necessary to translate
the production model of Marx into a system of differential equations.

§ 13.8. List of authors’ books: Book I, Book II, Book III, Book IV, Book V

The authors have four more books written. Here are their summaries.

LIST OF AUTHORS’ BOOKS:

1. Book I: Marx’s capital is political economic thermodynamics. The law of value is the ideal gas
law (Originally: Ʉɚɩɢɬɚɥ Ɇɚɪɤɫɚ ɷɬɨ ɩɨɥɢɬɷɤɨɧɨɦɢɱɟɫɤɚɹ ɬɟɪɦɨɞɢɧɚɦɢɤɚ. Ɂɚɤɨɧ ɫɬɨɢɦɨɫɬɢ
ɷɬɨ ɭɪɚɜɧɟɧɢɟ Ɇɟɧɞɟɥɟɟɜɚ-Ʉɥɚɣɩɟɪɨɧɚ).

2. Book II: Mathematized Hegel’s dialectic (Originally: Ɇɚɬɟɦɚɬɢɡɢɪɨɜɚɧɧɚɹ ɞɢɚɥɟɤɬɢɤɚ

Ƚɟɝɟɥɹ).

3. Book III: The political economic world of Marx-Engels (Originally: ɉɨɥɢɬɷɤɨɧɨɦɢɱɟɫɤɢɣ ɦɢɪ
Ɇɚɪɤɫɚ-ɗɧɝɟɥɶɫɚ).

4. Book IV: Lenin completely built the political economy of both communism and socialism (Orig-
inally: Ʌɟɧɢɧ ɩɨɥɧɨɫɬɶɸ ɩɨɫɬɪɨɢɥ ɩɨɥɢɬɷɤɨɧɨɦɢɸ ɢ ɤɨɦɦɭɧɢɡɦɚ, ɢ ɫɨɰɢɚɥɢɡɦɚ).

5. Book V: Marx’s theory of the universal man or every child is a genius (Originally: Ɍɟɨɪɢɹ ɭɧɢ-
ɜɟɪɫɚɥɶɧɨɝɨ ɱɟɥɨɜɟɤɚ Ɇɚɪɤɫɚ ɢɥɢ ɤɚɠɞɵɣ ɪɟɛɟɧɨɤ ɝɟɧɢɣ).
 171
171

Chapter XIV. The contents of the author’s book II: “MATHEMATIZED HEGEL’S DIA-
LECTICS”

§ 14.1. Introduction of abstract dialectical pairs A-B instead of concrete pairs

The task of “creating dialectics” was set by Lenin. It was necessary to formalize Hegel’s dialectical
logic and turn it into mathematical logic or into an analogue of mathematical logic. The authors
have completed the preparatory stage of this great task.

The results of the work are as follows:

a) The authors introduced abstract dialectical pairs: A–B, D–F, and introduced operations of multi-
plication of dialectical pairs.

b) The authors stated all the laws of philosophy for an abstract dialectical pair.

c) The authors created the science of DEVELOPMENT in the book “Mathematized Hegel’s dialec-
tics”.

The principle of DEVELOPMENT is not only the principle of continuity. This is a whole science
dual to Hegel’s “Science of Logic”, which means that it must contain as many theorems as Hegel’s
“Science of Logic”.

Mathematics is divided into the science of Logic and the Science of Mathematical Analysis. Logic
studies the discrete world, and Mathematical Analysis studies the continuous world. However, the
World is one and only, and there is the law of the UNITY of the WORLD. Therefore, the discrete
world and the continuous world are sides of the same World.

Philosophy is also divided into the Science of Logic and the science of DEVELOPMENT. Hence,
the science of DEVELOPMENT is a mathematical analysis of philosophy, and we need to draw
graphs of the theorems of philosophy in the science of DEVELOPMENT. But no one did it. So,
there is no science of development yet.

In the science of DEVELOPMENT in the book “Mathematized Hegel’s dialectics” the au-
thors’ drawings are as follows:

1. All drawings accurately reflect Hegel’s laws.

2. All drawings have rough edges that mean catastrophe. They have great resemblance to the draw-
ings of the creators of Catastrophe Theory, mathematicians Vladimir Arnold and Rene Thom. Why?
It is so according to Lenin’s theory “Dialectics is the science of catastrophe”.

To be more precise, the authors laid the foundation for the science of DEVELOPMENT.

The authors paved the way for the COMPLETE MATHEMATIZATION OF HEGEL’S DIALEC-
TICS. It is necessary to create an alphabet, language, inference rules, and also to introduce addi-
tional algebraic operations on dialectical pairs. The authors have partially completed this work.

GREAT MATHEMATICS-LOGICS ARE NEEDED HERE

172 172

However, the mathematized dialectic cannot be created by analogy with mathematical logic. It is
impossible to create it deductively.

§ 14.2. The main discovery of Hegel is the discovery of “EVOLUTION of CATEGORIES

AND LAWS (IDEAS)”

Hegel discovered the LOGICAL EVOLUTION OF CATEGORIES AND LAWS (IDEAS) long
before Darwin. According to Hegel, categories and laws are living beings. They are born, bloom
and die.
How to explain the greatness of Hegel? Hegel considered ink categories to be living beings when
stupid humanity considered living nature to be dead and not evolving. So, Hegel is an EVOLU-
TIONIST. And he created the theory of LOGICAL EVOLUTION long before Darwin!

Hegel’s evolutionary theorem. Logical evolution of Hegel.

Theorem.
1. Dialectical categories are living beings. They are born.
2. Categories are always born in pairs.
3. At birth, any category goes through the way of an evolutionary triad in logical time.
4. Any category first germinates in the form of an embryonic category. Then the category be-
comes a dead rigid category. Finally, it becomes a living dialectical category. The category
is born!
5. The birth of categories outside the logical triad is impossible.

The logical evolution of Hegel. Hegel’s evolutionary triad:

Embryonic dialectics Metaphysics Dialectics

Embryonic categories Metaphysical categories Dialectical categories
A living, but embryonic world The world of the dead The world of the living
Embryonic categories are with- There are dead, rigid cat- There are living, ever-changing cat-
out clear boundaries. They are egories. Constants. egories. Functions of logical time.
clouds.
Embryonic categories Metaphysical categories Dialectical categories
How did speech originate in primitive man? How did the first words and sentences originate in
primitive man? The answer according to Hegel’s triad:
WordsE WordsM WordsD
The words were embryonic. The pairs turned over on On the way to the world of Dialec-
They were words-clouds. their way to the world of tics, the metaphysical pairs turned
Each word could have dozens of Metaphysics. The words over. Dead metaphysical words be-
meanings. The meanings of became dead, rigid. The gan to come to life. They began to
words could change. Words were meanings of words have connect with each other. And under
born in pairs. become clear and de- the influence of neighbors, the val-
 173
173

fined. ues could be adjusted now. A sen-
tence was born. The sentence is a
living word. The sentence is a flying
word. Categories were born.
After birth, the dialectical pair begins to rotate. Continuous transitions: ‫ܣ‬஽ଵ ՜ ‫ܤ‬஽ଵ ՜ ‫ܣ‬஽ଶ ՜
‫ܤ‬஽ଶ ՜ ‫ܣ‬஽ଷ ՜ ‫ܤ‬஽ଷ ‫ככככ‬. Example. Transitions: wave՞ particle.
Theorem. It is necessary to pass through the dead realm of metaphysics on the way to the living
world of dialectics. Russian legends: ABOUT DEAD AND LIVING WATER.
A dead hero (bogatyr) must drink dead water of metaphysics in order to come to life. And then it is
necessary to drink the living water of dialectics. So the hero will come to life.
In Russian legends, dead water is needed to make the bones of the hero grow together. The living
water is a SOUL-IDEA, which the dead hero must drink.

Hegel’s doctrine is the doctrine of the dead and living water of humanity. If dead humanity drinks
the living water of dialectics, it will come to life. And then the universal humanity-hero will be
born.

Question. Is it true that Hegel pointed out the laws of the birth of ancient Spaniards’ words?
No, it is not true. Why?
There is the theorem of the great Engels. The laws of political economy are statistical. It means:
1. A specific phenomenon could be random. It may not obey general laws.
2. But the more statistics, the stronger the general laws are.

What did Hegel discover? Hegel discovered a general (logical!) scheme for the origin of speech of
all ancient peoples. Hegel is neither a historian nor a linguist. Hegel is a LOGICIAN! Marx, Engels,
Lenin are also the greatest LOGICIANS. They are actually mathematicians.
Hegel discovered not only logical evolution, but he also discovered all the laws of logical evolution.
And this means that Hegel discovered EVERYTHING! He discovered all the general laws of all
sciences.
When we independently discovered the evolution of categories, we became proud. Each of us
thought: “Are we close to Hegel now?”. But the leader of the dialecticians hit us on the heads with a
magic hammer.
According to Hegel: “Philosophy does not study categories. It studies the evolution of IDEAS!”
And we became small as microbes and looked up in amazement at the cosmic figure of the leader of
mankind. We were proud of what Hegel, it turned out, did not do.
Hegel worked with much more complex tasks – the evolution of IDEAS. And it means that the level
of abstractness of Hegel’s thinking is much greater than ours. And we again began to crawl along
the leader’s legs on his shoulders.

§ 14.3. Hegel’s discovery of the LOGICAL VACUUM

Hegel introduced the concepts of LOGICAL VACUUM and the laws of logical vacuum two hun-
dred years before the physicists. It is clear that the first categories must emerge from a logical vacu-
um.
174 174

§ 14.4. The logical theory of catastrophes was created by Hegel. He is the first scientist-
CATASTROPHIST on the planet
Lenin’s theorem: “Dialectics describes CATASTROPHIC PROCESSES”.
According to Lenin: “DIALECTICS is the SCIENCE of CATASTROPHES”.

It means that the creator of the new science “CATASTROPH THEORY” is Hegel, and neither
mathematician Arnold nor mathematician Tom. Hegel is the first scientist on the planet with CAT-
ASTROPHIC THINKING.
Today, catastrophic processes are taking place on the planet. The time has come for Hegel’s dialec-
tic; the magical hour of the SECOND COMING OF THE LEADER OF MANKIND has come. Our
Thor returned with the second coming, as he promised to return in Germanic myths.

Philosophical theory of catastrophes

1) Catastrophes are rare in nature and society.
2) All great events are ALWAYS a huge leap, i.e., CATASTROPHE.
3) So the CATASTROPHES contain the ESSENCE of all processes.

The universe was born instantly with a big bang. Life on the planet was born by a biological ther-
monuclear explosion. Huge planets, that swallowed by a black hole, died instantly.
The great USSR also died instantly. According to the theory of catastrophes, there is a great mys-
tery in the death of the USSR.
Theorem. Socialism died of old age. The death of the great USSR means that socialism is outdated,
and the epoch of socialist revolutions has passed into history.
The new epoch is the epoch of pure communism and pure communist revolutions. History has
reached the finish line of mankind.

COMMUNISM will be built by a direct, peaceful, dialectical revolution, bypassing socialism.

Socialism was only a GHOST of communism, and now real communism is going to come. This is
the secret of the catastrophe of socialism.

According to Hegel, mankind can perish within one day.

Dumb and greedy humanity has started the process of global warming. And not many people under-
stand that global warming is a DEATH MACHINE. And it is picking up speed.
Humanity will die instantly. The temperature rises a little every year. But according to Hegel’s the-
ory of CATASTROPHE, there will come a time when the temperature of the planet will rise in a
single stroke. And on that day, all the people of the planet will understand that it is the end of hu-
manity and we need to prepare its funeral. Humanity has no time anymore.

LENIN: “HUMAN POWER is UNLIMITED”

The power of more than seven billion people is unlimited. This power is enough to seed the uni-
verse with life. Only the collective power of all humanity can save the planet. We need the GLOB-
AL COMMUNISM, not socialism.
There is life in the Universe, and it will be found. But there is no life in our galaxy. Otherwise, we
would see it and it would see us. If we die because of greed and stupidity, then a universal tragedy
 175
175

will happen. Intelligent life in the universe will perish. Today we have the battle not for Russia or
Germany, and not even for the blue planet.
The BATTLE is for LIFE in the UNIVERSE.
This battle is not with enemies, but with our stupidity and elitism.
IDEALISM of Hegel.

It is necessary to kill not people, but it is necessary to kill DARK IDEAS of elitism: the idea of
riches, the idea of gluttony, the idea of commanding.
This is the secret of human history.

DARK IDEAS must be KILLED in OURSELVES, as the Great Che Guevara did it! Che Guevara
was a minister, and on weekends he worked as a loader. Command of the leader: “Kill the dark ide-
as in yourself”

Lenin: “WE MUST EMBODY the IDEA in OURSELVES”

Lenin: “I am the same as EVERYONE”.

Hegel’s most general definition of PRIVATE PROPERTY

Note. Private property is the property of one person.

Hegel’s theorem. Any DEAD, permanent, and METAPHYSICAL category is a PRIVATE PROP-
ERTY (metaphysical).
All METAPHYSICS is private property.
Left-wing intellectuals are fighting for a socialist state. They all angrily denounce capitalism: “We
will destroy private property”.
But they do not understand that all positions: a general secretary, a secretary, and a director are real
private property, which Marx bequeathed to destroy.
Socialist money, the permanent division of LABOUR under socialism, and the permanent manage-
ment system are also private property. Since all these categories are RIGID, PERMANENT, DEAD
– they are metaphysical.
Millions of left-wing theorists of the socialist state are not able to study at least one theory of Hegel.
They are dead in the political economy. They are a clear proof that the epoch of socialism has gone
down in history.
Engels: “The state is the private property of the bureaucracy”.
The entire state is the private property of individuals. The state was born as the private property of
lords or princes.
Results. Hegel’s theorem. Any metaphysical dead category is private property. And so it must be
destroyed. A living dialectical category will be born in its place.
The Hegel’s definition has the highest level of abstractness. There is nothing higher than Hegel. All
categories of Hegel in dozens of his books also have the highest level of abstractness.
Do you realize the cosmic dimensions of Hegel’s brain? Hegel is literally the new THOR.
WHY DO NOT WE HAVE COMMUNISM TODAY?
In the end, both capitalism and socialism are metaphysical, i.e. dead societies. Their collective con-
sciousness is the consciousness of the dead. And the dead are unable to understand the living world
176 176

of dialectics. The dead world is their ideal one. They consider the living world to be chaos. The
dead are hostile to the living world. And the dead consider themselves alive.
The supporters of socialism are pyramid-headed. Their brains have dried up in the form of a pyra-
mid of power.
The pyramids of Egypt are monuments to all the great statesmen: Pharaoh Ramses, Frederick the
Great, Stalin. But the epoch of the pyramids has gone down in history.
Lenin said: “Only the young can build communism”. Why? Young people are living, their hearts
are still beating. Their brains have not dried up in the form of a pyramid yet.
In order to come to life, people need to drink the living water of Hegel’s dialectics, as a doctrine of
a changing world. It is difficult to be the first. The first one will revive the second.
Revive, the dead, revive. Drink the living water of Hegel’s dialectics and revive. The Russian leg-
ends are true. There is the living water, and it is created by the great Hegel, the leader of mankind.
No one could understand Hegel’s DIALECTICS as the doctrine of the VARIABLE WORLD, i.e.
COMMUNISM. The dead love dead and permanent categories. The dead hate variable categories.
The huge logical hammer of the new Thor has been waiting for two hundred years, and no one in
the world can lift it!
The German legend of Thor’s hammer turned out to be true. And there is no great hero who could
lift the logical hammer of the new Thor – Hegel.
There is the mech-kladenets, a fabulous magic sword in Russian fairy tales. It is rendered “sword of
steel” or “magic sword” in English translations. And this legend of the Russians turned out to be
true. We HAVE the sword, and its name is “HEGEL’S DIALECTICS AS A DOCTRINE ABOUT
A VARIABLE WORLD”. But it is heavy, and there is no hero in Russia who could lift this sword.
Neither physicists nor mathematicians have built a single triad. But Hegelian triads must be con-
structed for all categories. Any category can be born only through a triad. There is no dual set theo-
ry in mathematics, and it is weird. After all, all categories exist in pairs.

The law of pair

in metaphysics in dialectics
Thing ୑ െ Relation୑ Thing ୈ െ Relationୈ
Definition of the Thing ୑ category Definition of the Thing ஽ category
Thing ୑ isThing ୑  Hegel’s theorem: Thing ୈ isRelationୈ . Here we have a
transition: Relationୈ ՜ Thing ୈ .
Thing ୑ isnotRelation୑ Deciphering Hegel’s theorem
Definition of the Relation୑ category Hegel’s theorem. THING is the totality of all RELA-
TIONS in the world of ESSENCES.
Relation୑ isRelation୑ Marx’s theorem. Definition of a human in political econo-
Relation୑ isnotThing ୑  my: Human is the totality of all PRODUCTION RELA-
TIONS.

Hegel’s theorem on THING in mathematics

There is SET. The set as a THING is the set. But RELATION for set is an arbitrary mapping of a
given set to any other set.
Hegel’s theorem: A SET is a totality of all MAPPINGS.
 177
177

Metaphysics Dialectics
Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory Set theory based on topoi (functors, mappings).
The appearance of topoi in mathematics is a great dialecti-
cal revolution. The leader of the revolution is the great
mathematician Jacob Lurie.
The topoi theorem. A set is the totality of all mappings.
Thus, the appearance of topoi is the appearance of dialectics in mathematics.

The complexity of the Zermelo–Fraenkel axioms.

Question: “Is it possible to abandon logic in first-order set theory?”
It is possible. It is necessary to give a name to each set and form the set of names as a dual space.
So the logic becomes unnecessary, but the logic is needed in second-order set theories.
Are there any axioms of the most abstract set theory?
Let’s slightly change Hegel’s theorem.

Hegel’s theorem Modified Hegel’s theorem

Theorem. Thing is the totality of all rela- Theorem. Thing is the totality of all properties.
tions.

Sets have the following properties:

1. Commutativity;
2. Associativity;
3. Distributivity;
4. Idempotence;
5. De Morgan’s laws;
Etc.
Here we choose basic properties from these properties, discard the rest of the properties, and give a
definition of the most abstract set theory.
Definition. The totality of objects is called the set system if the objects have the specified basic
properties.
There is no point in such a set theory, but we can enter some points:
1ሻ. ܽ ‫;ܤ׊ܤڂܣ א ܽ ֜ ܣ א‬
2ሻ. ܽ ‫ܣ א‬, ܽ ‫;ܤځܣ א ܽ ֜ ܤ א‬
3ሻ. ܽ ‫ܣ א‬, ‫ܤ א ܽ ֜ ܤ ؿ ܣ‬.
4ሻ. ܽ ‫ܣ ב ܽ ֜ ܣ א‬ҧ.
Definition. The totality of objects and points is called the set system if the objects and points have
the specified basic properties.
The infinitesimal problem caused a crisis in mathematics that lasted more than two hundred years.
Marx tried to overcome the crisis in mathematics and solve the infinitesimal problem. He learnt the
works of Lagrange and other mathematicians, but he could not solve the infinitesimal problem. The
infinitesimal problem was solved by Cauchy.
178 178

So, the mathematical works of Marx are published, there are useful ideas for mathematics. Marx
suggested defining the differentiation operator through its main characteristic property: ݀ሺܷܸሻ ൌ
ܸܷ݀ ൅ ܷܸ݀. Now in differential geometry, the operator of differentiation is defined in the same
way as Marx suggested.
The authors decided to imitate Marx. Following Marx, they gave the axioms of set theory based on
the basic properties of sets.
Lenin and Marx. The state thing fetishism is the reason for the defeat of socialism in the USSR.
State fetishism does not allow people to understand the theory of communism.
Lenin. The work “The State and Revolution” (1917).

Image translation: But it was necessary to touch briefly here once more on some of its features, be-
cause in Germany particularly the superstitious belief in the state has passed from philosophy into
the general consciousness of the bourgeoisie and even of many workers.
According to Marx, Engels and Lenin, communism can be built quickly. So, the state is no longer
needed.

Image translation: “The state, then, has not existed from all eternity. There have been societies that
did without it, that had no idea of the state and state power. At a certain stage of economic devel-
opment, which was necessarily bound up with the split of society into classes, the state became a
necessity owing to this split. We are now rapidly approaching a stage in the development of produc-
tion at which the existence of these classes not only will have ceased to be a necessity, but will be-
come a positive hindrance to production. They will fall as they arose at an earlier stage. Along with
them the state will inevitably fall. Society, which will reorganize production on the basis of a free
and equal association of the producers, will put the whole machinery of state where it will then be-
long: into a museum of antiquities, by the side of the spinning-wheel and the bronze axe.”

The blame is on the left-wing intelligentsia. Hegel’s dialectics has been ready for 200 years. And
the left-wing intelligentsia does not understand a single word of Hegel. Left-wing intellectuals are
primitive fetishists.
 179
179


Theorem. Thing fetishism is an inverting lens.

All left-wing intellectuals are convinced that they are the brains of the people, as they studied Marx.
Lenin turned over this statement.
Lenin said: “Intellectuals are not the brain of the nation, they are shit”.
Left-wing intellectuals act as if they are in 1917. What’s a comedy!
Hegel’s theorem. “Great historical events in history occur for the first time in the form of drama and
tragedy, and the second time in the form of comedy”.
It is the opposite. The workers are immeasurably smarter than the socialist leaders. They are ready
for communism. They are waiting for communism. However, the left-wing leaders are a hundred
years behind the workers.
Pure communism could have been built in 1871, if the Paris Commune had won. With the help of
Marx it was possible to jump over socialism.
How?
It is necessary to organize a factory-Commune. Productivity of labour will increase dramatically.
All people will see it and will understand that chiefs only slow them down.

The most general definition of a communist (not socialist) revolution from Hegel
Theorem. The communist revolution is a dialectical revolution.
Description.
According to Hegel’s idealism, the communist revolution is an IDEAL revolution, it is an uprising
of an IDEA.
The communist revolution is the uprising of the living against the dead. The purpose of the uprising
is to revive the dead, to revive the dead humanity.

§ 14.5. Hegel predicted the birth of the USSR with the doctrine of LOGICAL MONARCHY

Hegel, Marx, Engels, Lenin are LOGICIANS, i.e., MATHEMATICIANS. Humanitarians do not
understand their works.
All Hegel’s categories mean ABSOLUTELY NOT what is ACCEPTED in society.
For Hegel, FREEDOM is not that freedom, RELIGION is not that religion, NATIONALITY is not
that nationality, FAMILY is not that family, MONARCH is not that monarch that in history, He-
gel’s MONARCHY is not a historical monarchy.
All categories of Hegel are only LOGICAL!
Hegel predicted the coming of the Great Socialist State and Stalin with his doctrine of LOGICAL
MONARCHY.
Hegel’s theorem. THE HIGHEST FORM OF STATE is MONARCHY.
The word MONARCHY means LOGICAL MONARCHY, and the category THE HIGHEST means
the highest in logic! “The highest” does not mean “the best” according to Hegel!
Hegel had nothing to do with historical monarchy. There was no Hegel historian. But in the history
of mankind there was only one LOGICAL MONARCHY with 100% MONOCRACY. And this
was the Great Stalinist State.
Hegel and Lenin created the THEORY OF PERSONIFICATION.
180 180

Hegel’s theory of personification is the doctrine of the MONARCHY. Hegel is a Logician. He does
not study historical monarchies.
Lenin’s theory of personification.
Lenin’s theorem. The will of a class can be expressed in the will of ONE PERSON, i.e., one person
can be the personification of pure communism.
Definition. PERSONIFICATION is the representation of SOCIAL ORDER by one person or one
Goddess.
The theory of personification:
Hitler is the personification of CAPITAL. Hitler is the terrible power of CAPITAL embodied in one
person. Hitler (fascism) is the essence of the beast CAPITAL.
But CAPITAL is not people, and not oligarchs. The oligarchs are the great priests of the dark God
CAPITAL.
Stalin is the personification of the socialist state.
Lenin is the personification of the Commune – the global community.
Hegel is the personification of the DIALECTICAL SOCIETY. But there is only one dialectical so-
ciety – pure communism.
The Mother Goddess is the personification of the primitive Commune. And therefore, her image can
be used for the theory of the scientific GLOBAL Commune.
Stalinists at rallies shout: “Stalin! Stalin!”. The faith in Stalin is not faith in a particular man; it is
faith in the pyramid of power, and in the power of the state.
The great Stalinist state is the largest pyramid of power in the history of mankind.
The state is an organized force of millions. It is power, it is strength.
Is the theory of personification correct?
Stalin embodied both the best features of the socialist state and the worst properties of the state.
Is Hitler exception or regularity according to the theory of personification?
Hitler (fascism) is the essence of the Beast CAPITAL. And democracy is just a tailcoat of the beast.
But once again: the CAPITAL is neither people, nor capitalists.

The West should not brag about its democracy. It was the Russians who taught not to shoot the
workers.

§ 14.6. Hegel predicted the coming of Stalin with the doctrine of LOGICAL MONARCHY
Why does Hegel write so much about the MONARCH? Hegel writes about the logical monarch,
i.e., Stalin. Hegel develops his theory of PERSONIFICATION.

In the book, we have shown that Hegel predicts the coming of Stalin and the Great Stalinist state.
We have written out the Hegel’s epithets of the LOGICAL MONARCH and the logical monarchy
and compared them with the epithets of the Stalinists. They are identical.

Most importantly, we have shown how Hegel PROVES the future coming of the great socialist state
and the coming of Stalin.

The authors have shown the Hegel PROOF SYSTEM.

 181
181


§ 14.7. Hegel predicted the death of the USSR, as a METAPHYSICAL, non-dialectical system
The great Hegel criticized the LOGICAL MONARCHY. He also predicted the future death of the
Great Stalinist state after fulfilling its historical role.
It is very easy to show that. For Hegel, the STATE category is in the METAPHYSICS section. And
as we know, metaphysics will perish and dialectics should be born instead. There is no dialectic un-
der socialism. The socialist state is a MACHINE that makes the same monotonous movements.
It was possible to save the USSR, but only with the help of Hegel’s DIALECTICS as the doctrine
of a VARIABLE WORLD. But no one knows Hegel’s dialectics. No one after Lenin was able to lift
the logical hammer of the new Thor.

§ 14.8. Hegel’s dialectics is the doctrine of the VARIABLE, i.e., the LIVING, i.e., the DIA-
LECTICAL WORLD, i.e., the PURE COMMUNISM
The only VARIABLE (DIALECTICAL) WORLD is PURE COMMUNISM.
Hegel divided philosophy into METAPHYSICS and DIALECTICS.
The authors used the methodology of the collective of mathematicians “Nikolas Bourbaki” when
working on the mathematization of Hegel’s dialectics.
We modeled the categories of philosophy with the help of set theory. The set-theoretic description
of categories and laws (IDEAS) made it possible to give mathematical clarity to the theorems of
philosophy.

Analogies necessary for the study of Hegel’s dialectics

METAPHYSICS DIALECTICS
DEAD world that never changes LIVING, ever-changing world
World of CONSTANTS World of FUNCTIONS
Dialectical categories are functions of the
Metaphysical categories are dead constants.
logical time.
PERMANENT WORLD VARIABLE WORLD
Statics Dynamics (catastrophic!)
Dead world Living world

Hegel’s theorem. Hegel’s dialectics is the science of the VARIABLE WORLD, i.e., the LIVING
WORLD.
Consequence. All Hegel’s dialectical categories are VARIABLE, i.e., LIVING, i.e., dialectical, i.e.,
constantly evolving.
Hegel’s dialectical categories: FAMILY, NATIONALITY, RELIGION are VARIABLE categories.
And they have nothing to do with the biological family, biological nationality, and traditional reli-
gion.

HEGEL’S METHOD OF WORK

Lenin: “Philosophical categories are the most GENERAL, the broadest categories”.
Hegel gives each of his categories and each of his laws the MOST GENERAL, the most abstract
definition. It is impossible to make better than Hegel. It means that Hegel has the biggest brain in
the world.
182 182

There is an example of the leader of mankind’s method of work.
There is a definition of the “religion” category according to Hegel’s method.
Definition. RELIGION is a FAITH in the IDEAL.
Metaphysical religion is the world religion. Dialectical religion is the communist religion.The faith
of scientists in science, its power, and in the power of human knowledge is also a dialectical reli-
gion.
So, the thing is that Hegel gave to all his categories the most abstract definition. And there are hun-
dreds of categories. Do you realize the cosmic dimensions of Hegel’s brain? Hegel is literally the
new THOR with a huge LOGICAL HAMMER.
How did Hegel develop the theory of the VARIABLE, i.e., the LIVING WORLD, i.e., the DIA-
LECTICAL, i.e., the COMMUNISM?
He took the permanent, dead, METAPHYSICAL category of capitalism and declared it LIVING.
He made it LIVING, VARIABLE, i.e., DIALECTICAL. Hegel REVIVED THE DEAD WORLD,
he revived the dead.

The DEAD WORLD of CAPITALISM

There are the dead, i.e., metaphysical, i.e., permanent categories of capitalism: permanent classes,
permanent rigid division of LABOUR, permanent family (political economic, not biological), per-
manent nationality (political economic, not biological), permanent communities (dead tribes), per-
manent leaders (dead chiefs), permanent management, permanent and dead private property.
THE LIVING, i.e., DIALECTICAL, i.e., VARIABLE world of COMMUNISM.
Under communism there will be VARIABLE, i.e., LIVING DIALECTICAL CLASSES. One day
you work as a worker, and the next day as a scientist.
Under communism there will also be STALIN (but ALLEGEDLY Stalin by the law of the negation
of the negation). Makarenko: “THE DUTY OFFICER OF THE COMMUNE WAS A DICTA-
TOR”, but temporary.
Under communism there will also be dialectical, variable, living PRIVATE PROPERTY.
Example. I come up with a new telescope, and convince my comrades of the beauty of my idea. We
make a telescope together. It means that my comrades work for me, so, I am a temporary, dialecti-
cal capitalist for them. And they are my private dialectical property.
I will not receive financial benefit, but I will take a high place in society. It means that under com-
munism there will be a dialectical analogue of the concept of CAPITALIST.
But if someone comes up with a telescope better than mine, then he can overthrow me. So, com-
munism is an eternal non-class revolution. Thus, there will also be an analogue of the class struggle
under communism.
But if someone saves at least one PENNY, then people will fight with each other and break the
bones of their brothers.
Under capitalism and socialism, the factory personnel are your permanent, dead tribe, and you are a
political economic dead person. Under communism there will be real LIVING TRIBES. People will
work two days at the factory, one day at the theater, and two days at university with a variable divi-
sion of LABOUR. We will have many LIVING TRIBES. These tribes will be VARIABLE and
LIVING.
Hegel’s method is described in detail in the authors’ book. Hegel did more than just declare catego-
ries to be variables. Everything is even greater. He built a powerful LOGIC MACHINE, which the
 183
183

authors called the LAW OF PAIR. Hegel described the process of turning a dead category into a
living category with the help of the laws of dialectics using the example of an ABSTRACT PAIR:
THING-RELATION.
He used THE LAW OF THE NEGATION OF THE NEGATION, the evolutionary law of dialec-
tics, and so on. And then he just substituted real categories for his LOGICAL MACHINE. We
would need a whole book for the description of one pair! This incredibly beautiful theory is called
Hegel’s dialectics.
What is the main word in Hegel’s dialectics?
The most important category of the three categories (variable, living, and dialectical) is the “LIV-
ING”. The world of capitalism (and the world of the end socialism) is indeed a DEAD WORLD OF
DEAD PEOPLE (in political economy). But people do not know it. They think they are living.
However, this is an illusion, this is mimicry. The dead of capitalism know how to disguise them-
selves as living people.
The people of capitalism have never seen living people and the living world. They do not know
what it is like to be LIVING. People do not know that they are the GODS of the universe, and there
are no other gods except people. People come to life during revolutions, do great things and make
history. Then they die, and history stops again.
Now we are STANDING STILL. The political economic TIME has STOPPED on the planet. Eve-
ryone is terrified. People are going crazy because of it. They shout: “We are standing, we are stand-
ing still. Time has stopped!”
PEOPLE WILL COME TO LIFE AND WILL NEVER DIE AGAIN in the last revolution of man-
kind. And the time of mankind will move forward again. Communism is a system where people are
like gods, and gods are people.
Hegel’s brilliant idea is “to destroy the PERMANENT DIVISION OF LABOUR”.
People are still looking for the root of all evil of mankind, but they cannot find it. Although the
Great Hegel pointed it out many years ago.
Theorem. The root of all evil of mankind is the rigid, dead, permanent, metaphysical DIVISION OF
LABOUR. Proof:
1. The rigid permanent division of LABOUR generates EXCHANGE.
2. EXCHANGE generates MONEY, MARKET, and STATE.
Theorem. The permanent rigid DIVISION OF LABOUR is the first PRIVATE PROPERTY on the
planet. It will be destroyed last according to the law of TIME REVERSAL. Hegel predicted that the
society with a dialectical, i.e., variable division of LABOUR would come.

The historical role of the socialist state

There were scientists, cleaners, plumbers under socialism. In order to pay wages, people need to
COMPARE the LABOUR of people with each other. This comparison is made by the market under
early capitalism. And under socialism, comparison of the results of the LABOUR is made by the
socialist state with the help of the bourgeois PRINCIPLE “PAYMENT according to LABOUR”
(wages).
In order to compare the results of the LABOUR of different people, people need to MEASURE the
LABOUR of all people. Parasites are needed: norm setters, foremen, rectors, deans, and the entire
state.
184 184

The LABOUR is getting more difficult. The number of norm setters is constantly growing. And it is
the moment when the PARASITIC LABOUR of measuring LABOUR has equaled REAL LA-
BOUR.
There is only one solution. We need to destroy the parasitic LABOUR of measuring LABOUR. It
means that we need to stop measuring LABOUR. And then we will be rich, as all parasites, norm
setters and foremen will go to real work.
What is wrong with the bourgeois PRINCIPLE “PAYMENT according to LABOUR” (wages)?
This principle generates the RIGID DIVISION OF LABOUR. And the permanent division of LA-
BOUR is the main SETBACK of humanity. As soon as we fulfill the will of Lenin and destroy
wages, the VARIABLE Hegel’s DIVISION OF LABOUR will be immediately born.
It is impossible to have a variable division of LABOUR under socialism, as the socialist state is a
MACHINE for a permanent division of LABOUR.
Hegel is the LEADER of MANKIND
Lenin would not be a leader without Hegel, Marx and Engels.
Why has STUPID HUMANITY not been able to STUDY HEGEL’S THEORY for 200 years?
It is not about the difficulty of the theory. The thing is that capitalism is a dead world with dead
people in political economy. But people do not know this. They think they are living. The dead get
used to the dead world. And the dead world seems to them a good real world.
The dead are unable to understand the living world of Hegel’s dialectics and the living world of
communism. A dead man is okay being a dead man.
MOREOVER, the DEAD are HOSTILE to the LIVING WORLD of DIALECTICS and COM-
MUNISM.
They consider the living world of dialectics and communism to be an abnormal and hostile world.
And the dead will fight against the LIVING WORLD of the dialectic of communism. The dead will
fight to die, to make our dying planet disappear, as the state of dying is a blissful narcotic state.
AND THE DEAD THINK they are living and they are fighting to keep the planet living!
HEGEL: “THE DEAD SEIZES THE LIVING”.
CONCLUSION. “ONLY YOUTH CAN UNDERSTAND” Hegel’s dialectics and the theory of the
living world of communism (as Lenin said). The brains of young people are not in the form of the
Egyptian pyramid of power yet. They can still be revived if they drink the living water of Hegel’s
dialectics.
The communist revolution is a BATTLE between the LIVING and the DEAD (in political econo-
my).
The living fight to revive the dead. The slogan of communism is: “If YOU are ALIVE, REVIVE
YOUR COMRADE”. It is difficult for the FIRST to come to life. The first living man will revive
the others. Live the DEAD! Come to life! Russian legends about living water are true.
 185
185

§ 14.9. It is IMPOSSIBLE to study Hegel’s dialectics WITHOUT TRIAD INDICES of the au-
thors
What did the authors do to facilitate the study of Hegel’s works? The authors introduced TRIAD
INDICES to all categories of Hegel. There is triad indices work on the example of the “RELI-
GION” category.

Triad indices of Hegel

E – embryonic M – metaphysical D – dialectical
RELIGIONா Embryonic dialectical religion. This is a primitive paganism.
RELIGIONʛ Metaphysical, permanent, rigid class religions e.g. Buddhism, Christianity.
RELIGION஽ The dialectical religion of communism is faith in science and people. This
is SCIENTIFIC PAGANISM with the deification of nature! This religion is
VARIABLE. For example, we believed in an unproven physical theory,
and then it was refuted and a new theory was built. So we have to change
our faith. There is dialectical faith. It relies on proof and MIND. There are
TRANSITIONS: FAITH1 - MIND1 - FAITH2 - MIND2 - …
THE LAW OF THE NEGATION OF THE NEGATION
Theorem. The communist scientific-pagan dialectical religion “ALLEGEDLY” REPEATS the
primitive pagan ideology.
The “ALLEGEDLY” category was created by Lenin for a brief, concise exposition of the He-
gel’s law of the negation of the negation. Lenin was engaged in COMPRESSION of the theo-
rems of philosophy.
COMPRESSION of the theorems of philosophy is called the process of FUNDAMENTALIZA-
TION.
That is how Lenin died. During the autopsy, the doctor hit Lenin’s brain with a scalpel, the scal-
pel rang, and part of the brain turned into a stone.
Today the destruction of philosophy as a purely humanitarian science is the main task. Hegel
started this work. Hegel is a LOGICIAN, but in philosophy he worked as a mathematician.
COMPRESSION by the philosophy theorem is the move away from the humanitarian presenta-
tion. Lenin continued this work.

Hegel’s DIALECTICAL WORLD does not exist yet, because only PURE COMMUNISM can be a
dialectical, i.e., VARIABLE world.
Consequence. There are no DIALECTICAL categories of Hegel yet. They are NOT BORN!
There are no Hegel’s dialectical categories: dialectical freedom, dialectical necessity, dialectical
religion, dialectical DIVISION OF LABOUR, dialectical classes, dialectical CONTROL THEORY,
dialectical political economic nationality, dialectical LEADERS, dialectical new tribes, dialectical
PRIVATE PROPERTY, dialectical (variable) MATRIARCHY! They are NOT BORN!
According to Hegel, we are still in the METAPHYSICAL WORLD, where EVERYTHING is
PERMANENT.
Our categories are: metaphysical freedom, metaphysical religion, metaphysical (permanent) DIVI-
SION of LABOUR, metaphysical (permanent) classes, metaphysical CONTROL THEORY, meta-
physical political economic nationality, metaphysical LEADERS, metaphysical (permanent) PRI-
VATE PROPERTY, metaphysical (permanent) PATRIARCHY. All these categories are dead. We
are dead, but we think we are alive. We are in the matrix of CAPITAL. We do not live. We do not
know what a free life is.
186 186

Consequence
HEGEL’S DIALECTICS is the book of the FUTURE! The book of the future has already been
written by the Great Hegel!
There is no DIALECTICS of PEOPLE under capitalism and socialism.
Question. Under capitalism, the market changes and new electronics are created every day. It turns
out that there is the dialectics. But this is the DIALECTICS of MONEY and the METAPHYSICS
of PEOPLE. Under capitalism and socialism, a human is an ETERNAL SLAVE or an eternal sub-
ordinate. So, there is no dialectics of people under capitalism and socialism.
CONSEQUENCE. Hegel’s dialectics is the theory of PURE COMMUNISM.
So the dialectical revolution and the communist (not socialist) revolution are synonymous.
All Hegel’s books with collection of hundreds of Hegel’s dialectical categories are the BIBLE of
the new FUTURE WORLD. Hegel has nothing to do with the past. He is a PROPHET of the FU-
TURE.

§ 14.10. Hegel’s law of correspondence. The Bohr’s correspondence principle is a consequence

of Hegel’s law

Hegel’s law of correspondence:

From Metaphysics to Dialectics!

From the dead world to the living world!
From PERMANENT world to VARIABLE world!
The first description of the law of correspondence
a) Dialectics is the negation of metaphysics;
b) Dialectics is an uninterrupted continuation of metaphysics.
Newtonian mechanics and Poincare and Einstein’s Theory of Relativity

Metaphysics Dialectics
Newtonian mechanics Poincare and Einstein’s Theory of Relativity
The law of the metaphysical pair. The law of the dialectical pair. Theory of transitions.
Spacem and Timem are dead categories Spaced and Timed are living categories
in comparison with the categories of the in comparison with the categories of Newtonian me-
theory of relativity. chanics.
Timed is spaced
Spacem is spacem Physicists should properly describe this definition.
Timed is the totality of all directed changes in spaced.
Spacem is not timem. Transition: spacedo timed
 187
187

Spaced is timed
Timem is timem.
Physicists should properly describe this definition.
Timem is not spacem Transition: timed o spaced

The outstanding French scientist Henri Poincare played a decisive role in the creation of the theory
of relativity. In general relativity, Hilbert (not Einstein) created the cosmological equation. Given
the great contribution of Einstein, it is fair to call this equation the Hilbert-Einstein equation.
Are the categories of the theory of relativity dialectical?
Hegel’s principle of relativity. The categories are dialectical only in relation to Newtonian mechan-
ics. And their role is unknown in relation to other sciences.
Consequence. Bohr’s correspondence principle, Dirac equation and all other laws of correspond-
ence in all sciences that have already been discovered or will be discovered are consequences of
Hegel’s law of correspondence.
Physicists boast that they have discovered two or three laws of correspondence. But they do not
know that Hegel discovered all of them.

Metaphysics Dialectics
Capitalism and socialism are metaphysical, Communism is a dialectical, living world.
dead worlds.
Permanent, dead categories. Constants. Living, ever-changing categories. Functions. Variable
categories.
Permanent division of LABOUR Variable division of LABOUR.
Permanent classes “ALLEGEDLY” variable classes. “ALLEGEDLY”
category from Lenin.
Permanent control Variable control.
Permanent private property “ALLEGEDLY” variable private property
There are no tribes Variable tribes. “ALLEGEDLY” throwback to the
tribes. The tribes will be dialectical, i.e., temporary.
Permanent nationality Variable political economic nationality.
Definition. The political economic nationality is a
nationality by education.
Permanent family Variable political economic family. The spirit of the
brotherhood.
Permanent patriarchy Variable, dialectical matriarchy.
Permanent sectors. Permanent dominance Variable, dialectical pair: sector-territory with transi-
of the sector in the economy tions sector l territory.

Hegel-Marx theorem. METAPHYSICS will die out in the course of the dialectical revolution, be-
sides, the metaphysical family, the metaphysical division of LABOUR, metaphysical control, meta-
physical classes will also die out. The world of the dead will disappear.
Important. Dying out means dying out in political economy, not biology!
188 188

Thus, DIALECTICS will be born. The dead will come to life. The dialectical nationality, dialectical
family, dialectical, living classes, and dialectical control will be born.

The Global Commune is not a machine, but a LIVING BEING, like the biosphere of people. Every
day something old will die and something new will be born in the Commune.

How to prove that Hegel is really new Thor?

On the example of the law of correspondence, it is clear that Hegel’s dialectics can destroy the
problems of physics, and it also can help to build communism, as the whole theory of communism
is only a small consequence of Hegel’s dialectics.
So it turns out that Hegel’s DIALECTICS is the UNIVERSAL HAMMER of mankind.
The all-destroying hammer exists. Germanic myths are true. And this hammer is heavy, and there is
no hero who could lift the logical hammer of THOR-HEGEL.
Lenin was the last hero who waved the logical hammer of the new Thor.

§ 14.11. Hegel formed the theory of pure communism with the help of his famous TRIADS

Hegel’s triad: Commune – State – Communism (global commune).

The implication is that communism is the negation of the state and the Commune is a global com-
munity. Developing this idea, we will come to the theory of communism. And the commune is dia-
lectical, VARIABLE COMMUNE.
Hegel’s triad Matriarchy – State – Dialectical Matriarchy means that under communism there will
be a dialectical matriarchy. Read “What is it?” in Book II.
Hegel’s triad Youth – Old people – Youth means that youth will rule under communism.

The logical evolution of Hegel.

Hegel’s evolutionary triads.

Embryonic dialectics Metaphysics Dialectics

Triad indices
‫ܧ‬ ‫ܯ‬ ‫ܦ‬
Hegel’s triad: Tribe Eo State Mo Commune D
Community Eo State Mo Global community D
Primitive commune Eo State Mo Scientific global Commune D
Leader EoChiefMo Leader D
Matriarchy Eo Patriarchy Mo Matriarchy D
Territory Eo Sector D o Territory D
Youth Eo Old people Mo Youth D
No division of LABOUR Eo Rigid division of LABOUR Mo Variable division of LABOUR D
 189
189


The communist (not socialist) revolution is the world-historic defeat of the old people.
The theory of communism.
Hegel’s triad Territory – Sector – Dialectical territory means that under communism there will be a
principally territorial control system, but with transitions:
TERRITORY1– SECTOR 1 – TERRITORY 2 – SECTOR 2,...
We have supplemented the list of Hegel’s TRIADS with our own triads. Read it in Book II.

§ 14.12. The PROGRAM of HEGEL’S IDEALISM. The communist revolution is a dialectical

revolution. Communist (not socialist) revolution Is the UPRISING of the IDEA!

HEGEL’S IDEALISM
Hegel’s axiom. The communist REVOLUTION is the UPRISING of the IDEA!

The rise of a NEW IDEA over the rotting living planet of human and animals.
The uprising of the IDEAS of BROTHERING.
The uprising of BELIEVED LOVE and DEFILED BEAUTY.
The uprising of MIND, not POWER.
The uprising of the BRAIN, not ARMS.
The uprising of KNOWLEDGE.

The dialectical (communist) revolution is the IDEAL REVOLUTION! The uprising, as the second
socialist revolution will lead the planet to death.

Therefore, the communist revolution must be as the Hegelian revolution, as the IDEAL REVOLU-
TION, as the uprising of a NEW IDEA.

It is not October 1917. There are millions of the smartest scientific youth on the planet.

Theory of inversion
What rotates under
capitalism? socialism? communism?
Money (capital) Commands IDEAS
Living money seizes Living commands seize A LIVING IDEA gets into dead person, revives
dead people and dead people and lead him and leads him to build communism.
leads them to build them to build capitalism. The commune is not a machine.
capitalism. But under socialism, the Communism is a rotating galaxy of ideas and
IDEA of communism is people.
also living. Only Lenin Rotate, rotate, rotate!
led to communism. Lenin. Chiefs need to be constantly replaced by
workers and other employees. Lenin began to ro-
tate Russia with a mighty hand.
And at a certain speed, the Commune of Russia
will begin to rotate without any help and go to the
space.
Hegel’s idealism is beautiful
190 190

Theory of communism inversion
IDEAS AND PEOPLE will rotate under communism.

§ 14.13. Examples of Lenin’s use of Hegel’s IDEALISM

Lenin: “The IDEA of POWER will be replaced by the POWER of IDEAS”.

Lenin says that communism is an ideal system and that an IDEA (not people) will rule under com-
munism.

Lenin: “Communism is based on economics, but it is not reduced to it”.

And again Lenin means that communism is an ideal system.
Lenin: “Communism is a world in which there WILL be no PAST”.
Lenin says that communism is the DIVINE WORLD. There are no analogues on the planet.
Lenin’s formula of communism. LENIN: “I am the SAME as EVERYONE”.
Lenin: “We must EMBODY the IDEA in OURSELVES”.
Lenin: “We took away SOLDIERS from the ENTENTE”.
Lenin teaches us not to kill, but to take away with the help of an IDEA that embodied in OUR-
SELVES.
Hegel’s idealism. It is necessary to kill the DARK IDEA of elitism.
According to Lenin, “Dark ideas of elitism must be killed in OURSELVES, in our hearts”.

Question. Why did socialism die? Hegel’s idealism can answer.

When the IDEA of socialism was young and strong, it gave birth to great parties and great socialist
leaders. It gave birth to the Great USSR. But time passed and THE IDEA OF SOCIALISM fulfilled
its historic duty. It passed its valiant noble path.
The idea of socialism became old and died in the souls of people. Also socialism died.
Hegel’s idealism: the idea of socialism is primary. The idea is more important than socialism itself.
So, if the IDEA OF SOCIALISM dies in the souls of people, then socialism is doomed to die too.
Soon a new idea will rise over the planet; it is the idea of a global commune. Will communism be
built? Hegel replies: “ɋommunism will certainly be built”. The IDEA will do everything: it will
raise millions of new great Hegels, Marxes, Lenins, and there will be no civil war. Old CAPITAL
will have political economic heart attack.
The global Commune will demolish all socialist states and socialist chiefs.
Communism will send the capitalist and socialist states to the museum. Great Engels: “And put it
next to a bronze ax”. The socialist state will take a place of honor in the museum.

ABOUT HEGEL
We all have studied at the best universities in the world. We have spoken at conferences attended by
hundreds of scientists from all over the world. And Hegel was born when the witch trials were still
going on in Germany.
It is impossible to understand how a person born in the prehistoric era rises above us today. There is
only one thing to say: GERMAN NATIONAL CHARACTER:
 191
191

GERMANS are GERMANS. They are the GREAT GERMANIC PEOPLES.

The Germans, like the Russians, retained their primitive honesty and courage. They are as naive as
the Russians. They are also easily deceived. But it is not forever.

§ 14.14. Hegel’s idealism says that “We must kill the DARK IDEA of ELITARISM” and this
idea must be killed in OURSELVES!
The whole power of capitalism rests on the dark idea of elitism. According to Hegel, it is impossi-
ble to build a happy world without killing the dark idea of elitism. Otherwise any revolution is
doomed to die.
The dark idea of elitism is terrible and strong. It generates new dark fighters every moment. And it
is even more terrible when it turns revolutionaries into traitors to the revolution.
The dark idea of elitism needs to be killed; ONLY THE IDEA needs to be killed. How many people
does it take to kill the dark idea of elitism? It is all about the first one. Who will go the first?
Example. A German professor becomes a communard and cleans the toilets of his faculty in the
evenings. This news will spread on the Internet and all over the planet. And it is quite possible that
the only one person will be enough. And the dark IDEA of elitism will shrink and disappear.
Hegel says that if the DARK IDEA of elitism is killed, then CAPITAL will die too.
The idea of elitism is the thirst for wealth, the idea of exclusivity, gluttony, and the thirst for power.
How can you kill the state? You need to kill the idea of the state in your heart. You can give your
power to the team and solve all issues collectively, without commands. And thus the idea of the
state will be killed in your heart.

§ 14.15. The necessity of creating a new science – MODEL THEORY for MATHEMATIZED
Hegel’s dialectics

It is easy to model one pair. There is a BODY-SHAPE pair. The ball is a body. The shape of the
ball is a sphere. It is necessary to determine which of these categories is primary and material in re-
lation to the second and which of these two categories is secondary and ideal in relation to the first
category.
There is property of these two categories dual to each other.
1. Both categories are equal to each other. They are commensurate. Neither of them is worse or bet-
ter. They are just different.
2. Both categories are opposite to each other. They are qualitatively different categories. Obviously,
the surface and the body are completely different categories. So, mathematical formulas for surfaces
and bodies are different.
3. Transitions: BODY-SHAPE and SHAPE-BODY can also be demonstrated.
Here is another PHENOMENON-ESSENCE pair. If we multiply both pairs, then we notice that the
product changes from a permutation of the factors. We get complex double pairs. They need to be
MODELED. But how? We couldn’t even model two pairs. But young mathematicians will be able
to do it.
192 192

§ 14.16. Hegel’s dialectics is the THEORY of the GREAT UNIFICATION of mankind

The capitalist unification of Europe was supposed to be a progressive phenomenon, but there was
no real happy unification. The reason is that metaphysical systems cannot be happily combined.
And dialectical countries-communes will definitely unite into a dialectical global Commune. There
will be contradictions between countries and peoples, but the contradictions will be dialectical, so
they will be resolved with the help of collective mind.

§ 14.17. The development of the theory of communism with the help of Hegel’s IDEALISM

The authors are fanatical Hegelians. We know that the leader has created the theory of the evolution
of categories and ideas. The fact that he discovered logical evolution and established its laws means
that he DISCOVERED EVERYTHING!
We understand that among Marx, Engels, Chernyshevsky, Hegel and Lenin only Hegel is right. He-
gel is the God of Logic and he is the new Thor. We know that our leader is great. He is the God in
this universe. We should hold on to our greatest leader with all our might, and he will bring us free-
dom and peace. He will.
We decided to develop the theory of communism only with the help of Hegel’s IDEALISM.
How? There is only one answer: IDEALLY.
Here are some examples from our work.
Question 1. What should be the new communard (not socialist) party?
Answer. It should be ideal. People should be united in it only with the help of an IDEA embodied in
them. This party may include a billion people, as it is without a fixed membership.
Question 2. What should be the revolution? It should be ideal. Only the ideal revolution can be
peaceful.
Question 3. What should be killed in this revolution? The DARK IDEA need to be killed in our
hearts.
Hegelian evolution of the “EQUALITY” category
Capitalism. The equality in the market. The money equality. People are equal as two dollars are
equal to each other.
Socialism. Equality before the state.
Question 4. What should be equality under communism?
The answer according to Hegel: IDEAL EQUALITY is EQUALITY BEFORE THE IDEA!
Question to the reader. And what is EQUALITY before AN IDEA?
The answer is very beautiful, but we need to know what Hegel’s IDEA category means.
That is how we managed to understand the theory of communism. The theory of communism in the
form of Hegel’s IDEALISM is a very beautiful theory.
 193
193

§ 14.18. Hegel deceived the Prussian and socialist elites!

Hegel’s theorem. The highest form of the state is monarchy. Here is a clarification.
Hegel’s theorem. The highest form of the state is a logical monarchy. The logical monarchy is a
huge ROBOT STATE. All 100% of people are its parts.
However, the highest one is not the best. The state is in the METAPHYSICS section, and meta-
physics will be destroyed by DIALECTICS.
Hegel did not go to church. Why? Because Hegel is the God of LOGIC.
Did Hegel know that he was preparing a great dialectical revolution? Did God know that he was
God? He did. All his actions speak about it.
He celebrated the French Revolution day.
Hegel disapproved of the terror of the French Revolution. So wasn’t he a revolutionary?
We will answer for Hegel. Hegel said: “Put your guns down. Stand up with my dialectics and my
logical hammer! And there will be no civil war”.
Hegel’s idealism theorem. Axiom of Communism.
The ideal revolution is much more important than the real one.
The THEORETICAL REVOLUTION is immeasurably MORE IMPORTANT THAN the practical
revolution.
The revolution of brains is immeasurably more important than the revolution of arms.
Revolution is impossible without revolution in the minds.
Why? The theoretical revolution will win, and then millions new Hegels, Marxes, Engels, Lenins
will be born. Capitalism almost died because of only one Marx.
Lenin spoke of the general arming of the people.
Lenin spoke of a socialist revolution in an illiterate peasant country.
However, it is not October 1917. There are millions of the smartest young people on the planet with
a university education.
The socialist revolution will lead the planet to death. The revolution must be IDEAL, as Hegel or-
dered.
Not a universal armament of hands, but a universal armament of brains!
Not to rifles, but to theoretical weapons, to the IDEA!

Hegel is a materialist. He deceived Marx, Engels and Lenin.

1. The evolution of Hegel’s categories begins with the materialistic category! The great Logi-
cian could not make a mistake.
2. If the material conditions are all set, then it is not necessary to write about them.
3. Hegel’s IDEA is not the idea that journalists write about.


Lenin set the task of a materialistic description of Hegel’s dialectics.

The authors made a different decision. They described Hegel’s theory from a position of even
greater idealism. Two extremes converged.
The Mother Goddess was born when primitive communes appeared.
194 194

After her birth, a great victory came to the primitive communes. The children stopped dying.
Productivity of labour increased. It was much funnier to live in a commune. The number of com-
munes grew. And who gave birth? The Mother Goddess did.
Faith in the Great Mother Goddess is faith in the power of the primitive Commune.
Therefore, the Great Mother Goddess is the personification of the primitive Commune. And we de-
cided to use her image to develop a theory of the Global Commune.
Example. In Slavic mythology, there is a goddess named MATI SYRA ZEMLYA (Earth Mother).
There was a custom after giving birth to take the child to the field, put it on the ground and say:
“Mother Goddess, it is your child. Look how beautiful he is”.
Women believed that the Goddess gave birth to the child, through their body, or they gave birth to-
gether. Thus, the child had two mothers: one is the Great Mother Goddess, and the other is his
mother Tanya. And Tanya was also the daughter of the Great Goddess.
Karl Marx. Political economic nationalization of children. Why? Because all children are the chil-
dren of the Great Goddess, in other words, the nation.
And communism is the return of children to their mother – the Mother Goddess.
Communism will win, and the children will return to the first and Great Mother. And then the
Mother Goddess will tell her daughter Tanya: “Have a rest, daughter. I’ll take care of our baby”.
The commune will support its children as the Great Mother. Under communism, mother Tanya will
have a rest. The whole theory of communism of the authors is presented as a RETURN to the
MOTHER, the Great Mother Goddess.
And the Great Mother Goddess will definitely return with the SECOND COMING. She will.
Lenin’s criticism
Note that Lenin criticizes Hegel only at the beginning of his Philosophical Notebooks, and then he
praises him.
Why does not Hegel have anything about the commune?

Hegel does! Hegel’s dialectics is the doctrine of the global Commune. And we should take into ac-
count that Hegel is a logician and political economy is an applied science compared to logic.
Example. Hegel’s theorem: “Real science is always idealism”. Hegel says that logic is the highest
science and the categories of Logic are abstract (ideal). And that is true. After all, mathematics is
also an ideal science.
Perhaps, Hegel has written about the Commune. Hegel’s works must be read with a magnifying
glass, and every word must being checked for weeks. This job is not for mortals. Hegel and Lenin
wrote concisely and briefly. Every word of the leaders can be a great discovery as the equivalence
E=MC2.
Example. In Lenin’s book The State and Revolutions, you can see the word SEMI-STATE only
once. Although this word means a new type of socialist state. This is the second transition form of
socialism and detailed description of this word can take a dozen new books. Lenin’s form of social-
ism was never built. And that is why socialism died.

The THEORETICAL REVOLUTION is much more IMPORTANT than the practical revolu-
tion.
 195
195


Chapter XV. The contents of the author’s book III: “The POLITICAL ECONOMIC
WORLD of Marx-Engels”

§ 15.1. Marx’s theorem on the withering away of the nationality is TRUE, but as about PO-
LITICAL ECONOMIC nationality! Marx is not a biologist.

The authors included only one “POLITICAL ECONOMIC” category into Marx’s political economy
and Marx’s theory became simple and clear.
Definition. Political economic nationality is a nationality by education.
Marx’s theorem on the withering away of metaphysical nationality and the birth of dialectical, i.e.,
variable political economic nationality.
Nowadays young people speak several languages. That means the variable political economic na-
tionality has already been born. It was predicted by Hegel and Marx.
The birth of a dialectical nationality is the first sign of pure communism. That means communism is
coming. Marx has nothing to do with biological nationality. Marx is not a biologist.

§ 15.2. Marx’s theorem on the withering away of the family is TRUE, but as about POLITI-
CAL ECONOMIC family! Marx is not a biologist.
Definition. A political economic family is a family in spirit. For example, a coach and his students
are a political economic family. And biological, but dysfunctional family is not a political economic
family.

Marx’s theorem on the withering away of the metaphysical family and the birth of a dialectical, i.e.,
variable political economic family. The law of conformity.

Universities, factories, schools will become Communes under communism. They will become new
TRIBES. These tribes will be variable, i.e., dialectical. So your institute will be your first family,
the tribe of sportsmen will be your second political economic family. Such families will be variable.
Marx has nothing to do with the biological family. Marx is not a biologist.

§ 15.3. Marx’s theorem on the NATIONALIZATION of CHILDREN is TRUE, but as about

POLITICAL ECONOMIC nationalization! Marx is not a biologist.

Marx’s theorem on the POLITICAL ECONOMIC NATIONALIZATION of CHILDREN, not bio-

logical. Marx is not a biologist. No one will take children away from their parents. Under com-
munism, all children will be on the 100% economic support of the Commune. So, the children will
be economically supported not by parents, but by the entire Commune.
Example. Sports uniforms will not be sold in stores. It will be sent to the sports sections. The coach
will give the children the uniform. He will also order the necessary sizes. The coach will be the po-
litical economic father of his students.
§ 15.4. Marx’s theorem on the NATIONALIZATION of WOMEN is TRUE, but as about
POLITICAL ECONOMIC nationalization! Marx is not a biologist.
Under communism, all 100% of people will receive both WORKING and SCIENTIFIC education.

Hegel said that we need to destroy the PERMANENT, METAPHYSICAL, rigid division of LA-
BOUR, and replace it with DIALECTICAL, i.e., VARIABLE division of LABOUR.
196 196

All 100% of people will work two or three days a week as WORKERS, and the other two or three
days they will be engaged in science and art.

And then The Global Commune, socially uniform system will be born. So communism is a system
of WORKERS-SCIENTISTS or SCIENTISTS-WORKERS.

Under capitalism, beautiful women are the private property of the rich people. Under socialism,
beautiful women are the private property of the socialist elite. Under communism, women and men
will be common property of all men and women. How?

Marx’s theorem on the political economic nationalization of women under communism means the
following: “Theoretically, any beautiful woman can be yours. There are no social barriers, but you
need to prove yourself and surprise the beautiful woman”.

§ 15.5. Marx: “EQUALITY is the DESTRUCTION of CLASSES”.

Marx said: “Destroy the classes of WORKERS and INTELLECTUALS by merging into the
Global Commune”
Definition of class. The class is a part of society; the class is not the entire society.
MARX. Destroy the classes of WORKERS and INTELLECTUALS by merging into the GLOBAL
COMMUNE.
The Global Commune is a socially uniform system.
Marx, Engels, Lenin. Under communism, all 100% of people should become WORKERS!
Marx’s theorem. All 100% of people will become WORKERS with the emancipation of LA-
BOUR! And productive LABOUR will cease to belong to a certain class. Marx. The Civil War in
France.
The workers will become a WHOLE society. And the WHOLE is not the class; the CLASS is a
PART of society. And they are also scientists. All 100% of people will be engaged in science.
Communism is a system of WORKERS AND SCIENTISTS.
A WORKER is a political economic MULE in the theory of communism. The peasants give milk,
so the peasants are political economic cows. This is not a figure of speech. This is an exact mathe-
matical theory in political economy.
Oligarchs are political economic sharks. This is also an exact theory in political economy. Miners
are political economic mining donkeys. Their life is stupid and meaningless. The goal of com-
munism: the destruction of the worker as a class (in political economy, not biology). How? It is
possible by turning him into a worker-scientist with a variable division of LABOUR.
Two theories of Marx
The first “Emancipation of LABOUR” theory describes socialism.
The second “Destruction of LABOUR” theory describes pure communism.
We need to turn to Hegel to understand Marx.
Hegel’s order: “Truth is a process”.
Hegel means that “Truth is evolution; the truth is logical (unreal!) evolution of category”. The lead-
er orders: “Build the logical evolution for each category. Only evolution gives the truth. The logical
one is the essence of the historical one”.
We have always followed our dialectical leader. We’ve always fought alongside him. Hegel ordered
to create the evolution of categories. And we carried out the leader’s order.
 197
197

We have created the evolution of categories by Hegel’s order. We have shown how the category of
capitalism passes into the category of socialism, and how the category of socialism will pass into
the category of communism by negation. We have made an evolutionary scheme of three tables.

Logical evolution of the categories of political economy of

capitalism socialism communism
Right to LABOUR-POWER Right to LABOUR Right to CREATIVITY
No right to LABOUR No right to
CREATIVITY
The worker’s arms are his pri- Marx: “Emancipation of Marx: “Destruction of LABOUR”
vate property. And he has the LABOUR”
right to sell them.
Labour-Power Labour Creativity
Under communism, the category of la-
bour will be destroyed. It is not a catego-
ry of the political economy of com-
munism.
Consumer Consumer - Producer Producer

Universal higher fundamental education is necessary to realize the “RIGHT to CREATIVITY”, alt-
hough it is not the only one what we need. Under socialism, even the scientists of the Academy of
Sciences did not have the right to creativity. They could think only with the permission of the chief.
It is necessary to abolish all chiefs and the entire state in order to realize the “RIGHT TO CREA-
TIVITY”. Only then the number of new discoveries will increase.
A complete evolutionary scheme of three tables is contained in book III “THE POLITICAL ECO-
NOMIC WORLD OF MARX-ENGELS”.

§ 15.6. The law of shortening the social formations lifetime. Communism will live ZERO
years!
We carried out the Hegel’s order to creat the evolution of the category “Time”.

Lifetime of
Primitive Slave-owning Feudalism Capitalism Socialism Communism
Commune system
20000 4000 1500-200 400 100 0!

Theorem. Communism will live for ZERO years. Communism is an eternal revolution, not a class
revolution. The Communist revolution, once started, will go on forever. Everyone will have hun-
dreds of ideas and everyone will try to embody them. The struggle of people will begin again, but it
will be not a class struggle. The law of correspondence is fulfilled.
Alexander Blok, Russian poet, guessed the essence of pure communism with his brilliant intuition.
Alexander Blok (translated by Yevgeny Bonver): “And endless battle! We only dream of peace”.
198 198

§ 15.7.The political economy of communism is a quantum science!

Socialism Communism
Marx: “The state is a political economic A human is the electron of communism according to
machine” Engels
The epoch of Classical Mechanics The epoch of Quantum Mechanics
Human energy
Money IDEA (idealism of Hegel)
If there are a lot of money, If there are a lot of IDEAS,
then you will rotate in elevated orbit of
capitalism communism
You bring tactical ideas to the administration.
You bring strategic ideas from the administration to
your factory
Theory of inversion. Inversion of
money IDEAS and people. Hegel’s idealism
To cross over to elevated orbit, there should be a lot of
money new ideas

The difference between the struggle of people under communism and under capitalism.

The goal of the struggle of people under

capitalism communism
to take to give
The capitalist is happy The communard is happy
when
he eats the children eat
Happiness is
primal spiritual
Physiological reactions
Primal, animal, like Ivan Pavlov’s dog had.
The second-signal system
The first-signal system

The primitive world of great Germanic battles and great primitive leaders.
Leaders were obliged to fight. The cult of heroism.
According to Lenin, a subordinate is a slave. And there will be no slaves under communism. Ac-
cording to Lenin, communism is a system of LEADERS. And every person will be a leader under
communism. Even a three-year-old the child will be brought up as a great leader under communism.
Lenin’s theorem. All political categories of communism should be with a prefix SELF-:
Self-movement (Lenin), self-discipline (Lenin), self-organization (Lenin), self-management (Len-
in), and so on.
Lenin completed the political economy of communism. Now all the categories of the political econ-
omy of communism are defined.
 199
199

According to Lenin, every person must be a leader. Everyone has to move by himself (self-
movement) and lead others. There is a logical contradiction in this sentence, but this contradiction is
dialectical.
There will be an ALLEGEDLY (Lenin) return to the great Germanic epoch of great leaders under
communism. Great mathematical, physical, sports, chemical, and poetic leaders will be born and
will lead people into the great Cosmos.
The difference between academicians-leaders of socialism and academicians-leaders of com-
munism.
The leaders of communism will not have a document that says that he is a leader (academician).
And it means that the leader of communism will have to fight every day for the title of leader.
Millions of talented young lions will be born under communism. Young lions grow fast and they
can ALLEGEDLY overthrow you. It is an eternal struggle. It is a human life and a human struggle.
But if there is at least one penny left (in the political economic sense), then animal life will begin
again. People will turn into political economic beasts and begin to compete and eat each other. They
will tear off each other’s ears, and break the bones of weak people.
Many people misunderstand Marx.
Everyone believes that religion according to Marx is a fantasy, because of Marx’s expression “Reli-
gion is a fantastic reflection…” But according to Marx, religion is reality.
Marx: “All religion, however, is nothing but the fantastic reflection in men’s minds of those exter-
nal forces which control their daily life.”
That is REAL political force behind every great god according to Marx. The pagan god PERUN
became the main one not by chance during the reign of Vladimir. At that time, a state with a perma-
nent army was created; a professional caste of officers was born. This was the incarnation of the
God Perun. And history has proven it. The Russian officers were gods. They won all the battles and
saved Russia more than once. Only Gods are able to do this.
Law. Every the Great Goddess had a daughter. In Russia, the Mother Goddess had a daughter, La-
da. But birth does not coincide in biology and political economy. So, when was daughter Lada
born?
There is a consequence from Marx’s theorem. Daughter Lada could be born only when a new polit-
ical force was born. Which one? The first political force is the power of the primitive Commune.
And the second one? The second political force is the power of the caste of female priests. So,
daughter Lada was born when the power of female priests appeared and strengthened. There was no
way daughter Lada could be born earlier than this period.
This part is for historians. Historians can confirm or refute our statement.
200 200

Chapter XVI. The contents of the author’s book IV: Lenin built the political economy of both
COMMUNISM and SOCIALISM
§ 16.1. What is the difference between Lenin’s works and the works of Hegel, Marx and En-
gels?
Hegel and Marx gave only half definitions from the WORLD of ESSENCES. For brevity, they left
out of consideration definitions from the WORLD of PHENOMENON.
The task of CREATING DIALECTICS was set by Lenin. He set the task to turn LOGIC into math-
ematical logic. An alphabet, axioms and inference rules are need.
Lenin started making efforts to compress theorems and definitions. For that reason, Lenin provided
all the definitions in PAIRS and by way of PAIRS.
It is quite simple to formalize Lenin’s works. The point is to insert definitions made by him into
drawings of dialectical pairs. That is exactly what we did.
Lenin: “Categories must be deduced”. Lenin proves all major economic and political decisions. He
derives them from Hegel’s theorems.
Giving a speech to working women and weavers, Lenin always touched upon Hegel’s theorems. In
conversation with anyone, Lenin unexceptionally used the language of philosophy. He had no other
language.
Conclusion of the authors. Philosophical logic cannot be built by analogy with mathematical logic,
i.e. it is impossible to built philosophical logic deductively.
Lenin FINALIZED the political economy
both of SOCIALISM and COMMUNISM.
Lenin compiled two TABLES of CATEGORIES.
But not a single Marxist across the globe is aware of these tables!
Lenin compiled a table of socialist categories and a table of communist categories. There is nothing
in common between political economy of socialism and political economy of communism. There
are no common categories. As a matter of fact, they have different times.
The political economy of socialism is the science of LABOUR TIME.
The political economy is the science dealing with FREE TIME.
The political economy of communism is the science of the time for FREE CREATIVITY that does
not include production of engines, machines and refrigerators, as well as the LABOUR category.
The last will be replaced by the CREATIVITY category.
Lenin drew up all practical measures for the real building of real communism. It is understood, what
to do and how. Lenin’s complete theory and practice on the building of real communism are pre-
sented in the BOOK IV:
“Lenin built the political economy of both COMMUNISM and SOCIALISM”.
Lenin is the greatest political philosopher. His father is Ilya Nikolaevich Ulyanov, who had the de-
gree of Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences. He was a student of Nikolai Ivanovich
Lobachevsky, the geometer, who created non-Euclidean geometry.
In all fifty-five books written by him, Lenin uses all the laws of Hegel’s dialectics and the whole
philosophy reference book. He uses the principle of determinism, the theory of reflection, the prin-
 201
201

ciple of universal connection, the law of the negation of the negation, the theory of transitions
(wavelparticle), the law of time reversal (new Sparta), the law of the unity of the world, the Hege-
lian triad, etc.
Triad indices must be substituted in all Lenin’s books, and the laws of dialectics must be described
in detail. Lenin’s works are written laconically because Lenin was a leader engaging in war.
Example. Lenin proves the theory of the duality of socialism by using the PRINCIPLE OF DE-
VELOPMENT (the continuity principle). However, the principle of development is not just the
principle of continuity but a whole science that does not exist yet!
Mathematics is divided into the Science of Logic and the science of Mathematical Analysis. Logic
studies the discrete world, and Mathematical Analysis studies the continuous world. However, the
World is one and only, according to the law of the UNITY of the WORLD. Therefore, the discrete
world and the continuous world are sides of the same World.
Philosophy is also divided into the Science of Logic and the science of DEVELOPMENT. Hence,
the science of DEVELOPMENT is a mathematical analysis of philosophy, and we need to draw
graphs of the theorems of philosophy in the science of DEVELOPMENT. But no one did it. So,
there is no science of development yet.

The authors created the science of DEVELOPMENT in the book “Mathematized Hegel’s dia-
lectics”
The authors’ drawings are as follows:
1. All drawings accurately reflect Hegel’s laws.
2. All drawings have acute angles that mean catastrophe. They have great resemblance to the draw-
ings of the creators of Catastrophe Theory, mathematicians Vladimir Arnold and Rene Thom.
Why? According to Lenin’s theory “Dialectics is the science of catastrophe”.

To be more precise, the authors laid the foundation for the science of DEVELOPMENT.
Mathematics gave birth to the great Lenin. It was an influence of Nikolai Ivanovich Lobachevsky,
the creator of non-Euclidean geometry.
Lenin: “We see a striking manifestation of the dialectical LAW OF THE UNITY OF THE WORLD
in differential equations”. Lenin is right. Lenin is always right.
Lenin and Hegel created the whole set of categories of the political economy of communism.

Categories of political economy of communism

Hegel are dialectical, i.e., variable
Lenin start with -SELF

Hegel’s theorem Lenin’s theorem Under communism, the following

will disappear
The categories of communism The categories of com-
are dialectical. munism start with -SELF
Variable division of labour SELF-MOVEMENT (Lenin) Movement
Variable classes SELF-ORGANIZATION Organization of people by organ-
202 202

(Lenin) izers: State and Capital
Variable control SELF-DISCIPLINE (Lenin) Discipline
Variable private property SELF-MANAGEMENT Management
(Lenin)
Variable tribes SELF-PROPAGANDA Propaganda
(Lenin)
Variable political economic SELF-PEDAGOGY Pedagogy
nationality
Variable political economic SELF-MOVING (Lenin) Constitution will be replaced with
family IDEA
Variable, dialectical matriarchy RIGHTS and LAWS
Variable, dialectical pair: sec- Gender equality will be replaced
tor – territory with transitions by EQUALTY. Marx’s theorem.
sector l territory In practice, gender equality is a
flagrant INEQUALITY. That is
why it must be destroyed.

The state, money, law, constitution, propaganda and discipline will disappear under communism,
i.e. propaganda of the revolution will be prohibited. There must be SELF-PROPAGANDA of the
revolution. Lenin: “We must EMBODY the IDEA in OURSELVES”, not in your language.
Theory of communism. A subordinate is a slave. There will be no slaves under communism. Com-
munism consists of LEADERS. Everyone is a leader, even a three-year-old child is brought up as a
great leader.
Lenin created a party of leaders. He created a SELF-MOVING PARTY that is capable of moving
without a leader, i.e. a general secretary.
Lenin restricted newspaper editors to sing the praises of him. Seeing the leaders’ portraits on the
wall, he said contemptuously the following: “New icons have been hung once again”.
Lenin: “Leader… (contemptuously). The people are LEADER!” Lenin completed a formidable
challenge – he created the LEADER who was the PEOPLE.
Lenin conducted party discussions. What for? After all, it was just a loss of time for him. The truth
of the matter is that Lenin wanted the workers to stop being executive monkeys and mindlessly fol-
low orders. Lenin created the COLLECTIVE CONSCIOUSNESS of the party that would give rise
to hundreds of thousands of new great leaders from the working class.
Lenin brought up leaders. And he was absolutely right. Executive monkeys could not bear reform-
ing the economic and political system called perestroika.

§ 16.2. Lenin discovered the SECOND TRANSITIONAL FORM between capitalism and pure
communism
Lenin’s new KNOWN to nobody THEORY about the SEMI-STATE
In his works, Lenin indicated the cause of death of socialism and the dissolution of the USSR. Did
socialism exist in the USSR?
 203
203

Yes, it did. But there was pure socialism with absolute MONOCRACY. Pure socialism is a semi-
fair system with semi-equality. Lenin’s new theory made it clear that there could not be a seamless
transition from pure socialism to communism.
Lenin’s logic is as follows. An anthropoid ape could not morph into a human overnight. There were
many TRANSITIONAL FORMS, such as Sinanthropus, handy man (homo habilis), upright man
(homo erectus), working man (homo ergaster), pioneer man (homo antecessor), etc.
The same goes for socialism. Pure socialism cannot pass into communism in one go. There is a
need for a TRANSITIONAL FORM between socialism and communism. And Lenin created such a
TRANSITIONAL FORM between Stalin’s pure socialism and communism.
Lenin named this form a SEMI-STATE, i.e., a SEMI-STATE and SEMI-COMMUNE, i.e., semi-
socialism and semi-communism. It was Lenin’s socialism in the form of SEMI-STATE and SEMI-
COMMUNE that would peacefully go into communism.
In his typical manner, Lenin proved the theory of a new transitional form through the Hegelian
principle of DEVELOPMENT.
The authors described in detail Lenin’s theory of a new transitional form between socialism and
communism. Similarly, they represented the practical TRANSITION TO COMMUNISM according
to Lenin’s model of SEMI-STATE and SEMI-COMMUNE.
The practical construction of communism according to Lenin’s scheme of
SEMI-SOCIALISM and SEMI-COMMUNISM

Factory level. The Board of Shop Managers is appointed by the Commune. The factory director is a
subordinate of the Commune of Shop Managers. The Commune of Shop Managers is in a position
to change the director a whole bunch of times. The director becomes an agent of the Shop Manag-
ers.
The Commune of Shop Managers resolves all issues COLLECTIVELY by using COLLECTIVE
CONSCIOUSNESS.
Shop level. The Board of Shop Foreman is appointed by the Commune of Foreman. The Commune
of Foreman is in a position to change Shop Manager a whole bunch of times. The Shop Manager is
an agent of the Commune of Foreman. The Commune of Foreman resolves all issues COLLEC-
TIVELY by using COLLECTIVE CONSCIOUSNESS.
Work team level. The work team is appointed by the Commune. The work team is in a position to
change Foreman a whole bunch of times. The Foreman is an agent of the work team.
The scheme is clear. Each chief hands over power to subordinates and takes share of power from his
chief.
According to Lenin’s scheme, elections are not needed. Everyone keeps their position. But what
will be changed?
Marx: “In the world of essences, political economy is the science of the PRODUCTION RELA-
TIONS OF PEOPLE”.
Communism will change the production relations of people.

Production relations of people under

capitalism socialism communism
Commodity-money, i.e. With COMMANDS, i.e. ma- very common –
greedy chine human relations
204 204

What will happen if a factory operates under Lenin’s scheme?
Under socialism, people were analogous to the cogs in the wheel: “Give a command, receive a
command”. And the whole factory operated as if it was a huge robot. The factory did not have the
COLLECTIVE CONSCIOUSNESS and consciousness itself. Under communism, everyone will put
a thinking cap on, start to prove their point, thus raising the level of consciousness.
Under capitalism, they gain belly fat in America. Communism reverses the situation: people will
gain knowledge instead of belly fat.
Important

The pyramid of power is a machine, a huge iron robot, where people are the cogs. But people will
come to life. The TRANSFORMATION OF PEOPLE AND IDEAS will begin. Leaders will be
changed on a regular basis. Why?

Example. A computer re-equipment of the factory is considered at the Commune of Shop Manag-
ers. And the Shop Manager is not able to make head or tail of it. In his stead, the best computer spe-
cialist goes to a meeting in the central Commune. Similar situations will be repeated.
And the great transformations of people and ideas will change the factory into a LIVING BEING.

§ 16.3. Lenin destroyed MONEY (greed) within the PARTY using partmaximum

The PARTMAXIMUM is the maximum salary for Communist Party members. Through the use of
it, Lenin destroyed MONEY within the party. Lenin’s logic is simple. If the communists want to
destroy MONEY and GREED, they must start with their MONEY and their GREED.
Lenin issued a prohibition against having and accumulation of MONEY by leaders of communism
and therefore by himself. Under Lenin’s law on the PARTMAXIMUM, the leaders of communism
have to live like workers. Lenin was the new Lycurgus. He proved that one must come through
Sparta (a new Sparta) in the transition to pure communism.
Lenin knows that his Stepan Razins are still executive monkeys. As soon as he says: “Sparta”, they
will run and brandish swords without a second thought. Therefore, Lenin shook his finger and said:
“NEW SPARTA”.

Greatness of the Hellenes

Ancient Greece was the world’s unique ethnic group that was born as a dialectic pair: ATHENS-
SPARTA. There are undisguised conflict and unity of opposites. This stage was the stage of embry-
onic dialectics. There was a divarication of the one.

The next step is metaphysics. A metaphysical conflict took place between Athens and Greece. The
metaphysical conflict means the war. And the Athens-Sparta pair disappeared.
But this pair will be reborn under communism. A communist society will be both Sparta and Athens
with Sparta-Athens transitions.
According to Lenin, communism will be Athens-Sparta, but ALLEGEDLY Sparta and ALLEG-
EDLY Athens, i.e. there will be no acts of cruelty and no elite.
 205
205

§ 16.4. The statistical accuracy of Marx’s theorems is determined. SIX DECIMAL PLACES!
Marx’s theorems are satisfied within an accuracy of six decimal places.
Marx and Engels’s theorem. Social existence statistically generates ɫollective consciousness.
The theory of communism as a variable system was created two hundred years ago by the great He-
gel. Later, it was developed by Marx and Engels. Lenin compiled a table of socialist categories, as
well as communist categories. In addition, he set out all the practical measures for building the real
communism.
But not a single left-wing leader knows about it!
1. Not a single left-wing leader knows what DIALECTICS is, i.e. none of the left-wing politics
knows that dialectics is the science of a VARIABLE WORLD.
The left-wing leaders all over the world do not even understand the meaning of the term
DIALECTICS. Do you doubt? Ask any great leader and he will give you a lecture for an
hour.
2. Not a single left-wing leader knows the Hegelian scientific definition of the state.
3. Not a single left-wing intellectual knows Marx’s THEORY of the UNIVERSAL MAN.
4. Not a single left-wing intellectual knows what PURE COMMUNISM IS.
5. Not a single left-wing leader knows the difference between the socialist and communist cat-
egories. He cannot give examples.
6. Not a single left-wing leader knows that all the provisions of the Hegel, Marx, Engels and
Lenin’s theories are RIGOROUSLY PROVEN. None of them have a clue that there is proof
of theorem.
7. All left-wing leaders are not scientists but PRIESTS of SOCIALISM. They even sound like
priests: “Marx himself said”. Compare: “The Buddha himself said”.

How is it so? Why does no one know the theory that was created two hundred years ago?
Theorem. The intelligentsia exploits the COMMON PEOPLE by means of a rigid unfair DIVISION
OF LABOUR.
Consequence. The existence of the LEFT-WING INTELLECTUALS is BOURGEOIS. The left-
wing intellectuals are also exploiters. Exploitation by a rigid unfair metaphysical division of labour
is none the worse than the exploitation by a capitalist.
Under Marx’s theorem, the left-wing intellectuals have a bourgeois philosophy. Which is why the
left-wing intellectuals are unable to understand Hegel’s dialectics and Marx’s theory.
What is this all-powerful huge bourgeois poop that suppressed millions of left-wing intellectuals? It
is called the idea of ELITISM.
Question. Why could not the left-wing intellectuals understand the complete theory of communism?
The death sentence imposed by Lenin: “The left-wing intellectuals are a BOURGEOIS STRA-
TUM”.
The left-wing intellectuals exploit people using an UNFAIR DIVISION OF LABOUR and want to
exploit the common people for eternity.

§ 16.5. The historical role of socialism is monopolization. But CAPITAL accomplished a mis-
sion of socialism. Thus, socialism is not needed, and not possible.

Why was it impossible to build communism between 1917 and 1930? Socialism is needed not for
the suppression of the bourgeoisie, but for monopolization. It was necessary to monopolize the pet-
it-bourgeois peasant class.
206 206

§16.6. E-money is the death of TECHNICAL MONEY, i.e. the technical base for the destruc-
tion of POLITICAL ECONOMIC money is already present.
There was a monetary reform in Federal Republic of Germany after the war. The Germans de-
stroyed 95% of the money in a day. They handed over 30 DEM per person, and they destroyed the
speculators and shadow economy in a day. And the industrial sector came alive again!

§ 16.7. Lenin compiled a table of categories of political economy of socialism. But no one
knows it!
The theory of the duality of socialism as a system
Lenin’s theorem. Socialism is a semi-communist and semi-bourgeois system.
Hegel’s theory. TRUTH IS a PROCESS.
The leader says that the truth can be found only in EVOLUTION of CATEGORIES and IDEAS.
An evolution must be created for each category.
This table shows both Lenin’s theory of duality and Hegel’s evolution.
We show that the evolution is as follows: Moneyotoken money otoken.

Political Political economy of socialism Author The political economy of

economy of communism
capitalism
Living half-dead Dead
TOKEN (Labour vouchers
Money token money Lenin under Marx). They are dead
money
ɋommodity ɋommodity-Product Lenin Product
Unfair Semi-fair system, i.e.
Lenin Fair
fair-unfair system
Inequality Semi-equality, i.e. equality-inequality Lenin Equality
Proletarian Worker: semi-worker and semi-
Lenin Creator
(hired worker) creator
Labour force Labour Creation
Labour time Labour time. But the working people
did not spare their lives. Free time
Thus, they spent their free time

Lenin proved this theorem twice. For the first time, he used the Hegelian PRINCIPLE of DEVEL-
OPMENT (principle of continuity). For the second time, he used Marx’s theory “Inequality of
communist law”.
Consequence. All categories of the political economy of socialism are DUAL-COMPOSITE. They
are composed of two categories: communist and capitalist.
Lenin’s complete table of categories can be seen in Book IV “Lenin built the political economy of
both communism and socialism”. It also contains a detailed explanation of each category.
 207
207

Lenin’s theory of the dual role of trade unions under socialism.
Lenin’s theorem. In contrast to capitalism, under socialism the role of trade unions must be dual.
1) For one part, trade unions must protect workers.
2) For the other part, trade unions must participate in the industrial engineering, organization of
the experience transfer. Persuasion, making low-performing workers do their job, encour-
agement of foremost workers.
The theorists of the bourgeois system raised an objection: “It is bad that the trade unions should co-
erce the workers. They should only protect them”.
Answer: Under socialism, there was procuracy that is a government bureau concerned with ensuring
administrative legality in the former Soviet legal system. The procuracy protected workers far better
than the trade unions did. Under capitalism in Russia part of the procuracy, which adore the rich
and despise the poor workers, deliberately came down to the capitalists’ side.
Trade unions are parasites. That is why they will disappear under communism.
Lenin developed the theory for himself. If he had organized the work of factories on the basis of
COLLECTIVITY, there hardly would have been much coercion. Although coercion was necessary
back at the time. As distinct from Germany, Russia was a peasant country. And the peasants are an-
archists.
Results. Lenin derives all practical measures from Hegel’s theorems, i.e. theorems of dialectics.
Lenin’s theorem on the dual role of the working class under socialism.
Lenin’s theorem. Any state means oppression. The workers are obliged to fight even against the
Soviet state while also cherish it as the apple of their eye.
Source: Lenin quotes https://burido.ru/843-tsitaty-lenina .
Lenin led the socialist revolution.
Lenin built a socialist state that is also a machine of coercion and violence.
Theory of Communism. The COMMAND of the head teacher is the worst COERCION against
teachers.
What was the main difficulty in building socialism?
In contrast to Germany, there were few regular proletariats in Russia. The country was anarchistic.
The front-line soldiers feared neither Heaven nor Hell.
As distinct from Germany, there was NO STATE in Russia, neither socialist nor capitalist. LEN-
IN’S COMMANDS were NOT FOLLOWED. The local revolutionary leaders did whatever they
wanted.
There was bread in Russia, but it was impossible to deliver it to the regions suffering from starva-
tion. There is no executive state machine that follows all commands right away.

So, there is no STATE. And this is a quick, even instant death.

It was necessary to rapidly create a state machine. That is why Lenin needed people like Stalin.
With fire and sword, Stalin created a great machine called a socialist state and thereby saved social-
ism.
However, the socialist state is also a coercion machine, according to Lenin and Marx. This machine
has its own will and can needlessly coerce people.
So what is to be done?
Let us quote leader’s immortal thoughts once again.
208 208

Lenin’s theorem. Any state means oppression. The workers are obliged to fight even against the
Soviet state while also cherish it as the apple of their eye.
Source: Lenin quotes https://burido.ru/843-tsitaty-lenina
Discussion of Lenin’s theorem.
1) On the one hand, the workers must make every effort to support the socialist state and fight
for it for dear life.
2) On the other hand, the workers must also fight against the disadvantages of the socialist
state. And the state always has these disadvantages.

Recall that there were very few regular experienced workers in Russia. Under the socialist state,
peasants, who were former revolution heroes, were turned into proletarians. Coercion was needed.
How difficult it is to make the heroes of the revolution work hard. And Stalin got this job done by
fire and sword.
But complete oppression of the working class by the socialist state was not on Lenin’s agenda. Len-
in made the struggle and unity of opposites, i.e. he built an embryonic dialectical pair:

An embryonic dialectical pair is able to pass into a real dialectical pair, i.e. it is capable of unlimited
development and constant modernization.
Stalin’s state completely oppressed the working class, i.e. Stalin built a metaphysical pair:

The metaphysical system was destined for failure without Lenin. But if transformed into a dialecti-
cal system, the USSR could pass into communism.
Conclusion. The theory of the dual role of the working class under socialism follows from Lenin’s
theorem on the duality of socialism.
The dual role of Stalin
After the death of Lenin, Stalin laid a course for mass literacy, collectivization and industrialization.
Stalin: “We must achieve collectivization and industrialization in ten years. We must make the way
that took the capitalist countries a hundred years. Failing that, there will be death”. All the other
great leaders were against it and attacked Stalin. Stalin hardly withstood attack. But he was support-
ed by workers and communists.
The theory of socialism in the form of a monopoly and a single socialist state was developed by
Lenin. He assures that there should be a unified property, i.e. the property of the socialist state. Un-
der Lenin’s theory of duality, socialist property is semi-public and semi-non-public.
Under communism, property will also be unified. Communist property will be completely public.
Public property will appear only if The Global Commune, socially uniform system, is born. Under
communism, the division of society into classes (workers and intellectuals) will be eliminated.
Stalin’s merit
 209
209

Back in 1930, there was no regular proletariat. In the USSR, there was nothing but famine and total
illiteracy. By 1941, factories and universities were built and scientists and workers did their job.
The first generations of literate youth grew up and saved the USSR and socialism.
It is difficult to realize how such a giant leap into the future could be made in ten years. If there had
not been Stalin, then Leon Trotsky, Nikolai Bukharin and other petite bourgeois leaders would have
won. And this would mean death, because only ten years remained before death. Thus, Stalin was
an outstanding leader of socialism during that time.
Stalin’s negative role
But the terrible year of 1937 is also the truth. The historical reason for the events of that year is that
the country was a peasant and petite bourgeois. Illiterate peasants are inclined to religion and the
deification of leaders.
Lenin: “Petite bourgeois anarchy has swept the small regular proletariat”.
Czechoslovakia was an industrial country with a larger regular proletariat. Petite bourgeois anarchy
and the events of 1937 could not take place in Czechoslovakia.
Thus, Stalin’s role was dual
Conclusion. Lenin’s theory of the duality of socialism was confirmed in Stalin’s personality with
terrifying accuracy.
Lenin led the communist revolution in parallel to the socialist one!
But the communist revolution is a negation of the socialist revolution. It is directed against the so-
cialist revolution. Communism will remove the socialist state from power and create a global
Commune. However, the transition from socialism to communism is only a semi-class revolution
with reference to Lenin’s theory of duality.
Therefore, it could take place peacefully according to Lenin’s semi-state and semi-commune
scheme. But the left-wings abandoned Lenin and Marx. They rejected Marx and Lenin’s doctrine of
communism as a society without a state.

Lenin built COMMUNISM, not SOCIALISM!

(Socialism supposed to be a temporary transition period according to Lenin and Marx)

1. Lenin’s work “A great beginning”. Quotes:
“The word ‘commune’ is being handled much too freely. It is being not infrequently forgotten that
this very honourable title must be won by practical achievement in genuine communist develop-
ment”.
Author’s note. Lenin means that the Communes are not state institutions with chiefs. They should
not be confused. Only real communes must be termed as Communes, i.e. societies of equals without
chiefs.

2. The original version of the article “The Immediate Tasks of the Soviet Government”
The quote: “Each FACTORY, each artel (company) … is an INDEPENDENT COMMUNE with an
internal organization of labour. In each COMMUNE, there is an increase in SELF-DISCIPLINE.
This is how we can and must ensure that the influence of example becomes, above all, a moral
model for the labour organization, and then a coercively introduced model in the new Soviet Rus-
sia”.
Analysis. By the Commune Lenin understands precisely the Commune. Take note of that the com-
mune must have SELF-DISCIPLINE. Under socialism there was the DISCIPLINE as well, which is
210 210

as it should be. However, it is not the same. The COMMUNE is SELF-MOVEMENT, and social-
ism is the MOVEMENT under the leadership of the socialist state. They are absolutely opposite.
3. Lenin’s work “How to organize competition?”. The quote:
“All COMMUNES – any factories, and any villages – must compete with each other. These are the
practical successes our COMMUNES should be proud of”.
4. Rough outline of the DRAFT PROGRAMME. The 7th Congress of the RCP(b).
“Organisation of competition between the various communes”.
5. Lenin “Measures governing the transition from bourgeois-co-operative to proletarian-communist
supply and distribution”Lenin’s Collected Works, book 37 pages 471-472.
“The whole difficulty of the task springs from the fact that we have to work out a system of practi-
cal measures governing the transition to a REAL COMMUNE”.
Discussion. Note that LENIN emphasizes THE REAL COMMUNE on purpose.
6. Lenin “Speech Delivered at the First Congress of agricultural COMMUNES and agricultural
ARTELS”
DECEMBER 4, 1919
The quote: “We shall bring about situation when each of the SEVERAL THOUSAND EXISTING
COMMUNES will become a genuine nursery for COMMUNIST IDEAS and VIEW”.
Question: Where have THOUSANDS of Lenin’s communes gone?
The communes did not fall to pieces, but were DESTROYED. Even congresses of COMMUNES
and ARTELS were HELD under Lenin.
Communes and the socialist state are not compatible. Communes raise proud and insubordinate
people. Socialism and communism are opponents.
Lenin uses both terms ‘artel’ and ‘community’ as synonyms for the ‘commune’. But it is important
to realize that the old commune is a primitive one. The modern scientific community is the theater
community, the university community, the Academy of Sciences community, and the division
community. Scientific communities (communes) are most effective in the most complex sectors
7. Lenin’s work “Addendum to the draft regulations on subbotniks”.
“Subbotniks are a form of propaganda of the ideas of compulsory labour service and SELF-
ORGANISATION of the WORKING CLASS”.

Discussion. When Lenin uses a prefix SELF-, it is referred to the THEORY of COMMUNISM. Af-
ter this comment, any worker can distinguish Lenin’s theory of socialism from theory of com-
munism. We have given only a small number of examples demonstrating that Lenin built both so-
cialism and communism.
All quotes are from “On COMMUNIST LABOUR” by Marx, Engels and Lenin.

 Caution: do not even think of building a primitive commune

The difference between a global scientific commune and a primitive agricultural commune is the
same as between Heracles and the germ cell thanks to which he came into being.
 211
211

Marx’s commune is a rotating system. Marx’s commune is a revolving galaxy of people. Marx’s
communes are the commune of the General Staff, the commune of the army, the commune of the
Academy of Sciences, the commune of humanity.
Question. Is socialism a transitional system to communism? No, it is not. In the USSR, socialism
was built as a separate system. Is it logical? Yes, it is logical.
After all, the evolution of societies occurs under the scheme: capitalism-socialism-communism.
One system replaces another.

But what about Marx’s doctrine of socialism as a transitional system?

Marx’s proposition is to jump over socialism. Marx proposes not to build socialism and start build-
ing communism from the first.
Marx’s theorem. Socialism is not a transition period, but it can and must be MADE a TRANSI-
TIONAL SYSTEM to communism.
Under Lenin’s theorem on the duality of socialism, socialism is a transitional system to capitalism.
Why? The point is that the bourgeois side of socialism will be under progression.
Any system with money sooner or later becomes capitalism. After all, money always wants to turn
into capital. Under socialism there was an evolution of money, but the evolution of money is the
evolution of greed. Money is a self-increasing greed of people.
Biological evolution starts with the cell. The evolution of money also starts with a cell, which is a
LABOUR PENNY (wage). Evolution must be killed!
Lenin: “PAYMENT ACCORDING to LABOUR is BOURGEOIS”. Lenin: “WAGES must be DE-
STROYED”.
You need to kill your LABOUR PENNY to get the evolution of greed killed. CAPITAL will die as
a consequence.

Lenin executed Marx’s plan “Jump over socialism”

Lenin was building a socialist state and teaching the workers to neutralize its disadvantages. And
when the workers become literate, then the chiefs will go by the board. Lenin wanted abolish the
socialist state, i.e. to abolish himself as the chief.
It was difficult for Lenin.
Russia is not Germany. Almost the entire nation (80%) could neither read nor write. Russia was a
peasant country, and the peasants are the petite bourgeoisie. There was no state. There were no dis-
ciplined regular workers to follow orders.
Lenin was building a state that did not exist. He also taught the workers (who were few) to abolish
the state when it is built.
Lenin was leading two revolutions at once. He was also led a communist revolution against social-
ism that had not yet been built. Socialism must first be built and then abolished.
The October Revolution was organized by Lenin ALONE
The Central Committee (CC) was against the revolution and rendered a decision to burn all Lenin’s
letters! Why? They were intellectuals. They were afraid.
212 212


Meeting of the Central Committee of the R.S.D.L.P.(B.)

September 15 (23), 1917

Attendees:
Trotsky, Kamenev, Rykov, Nogin, Stalin, Sverdlov, Bubnov, Bukharin, Oppokov [Lomov], Kollon-
tai, Dzerzhinsky, Uritsky, Ioffe, Shaumyan, Sokolnikov, Milyutin.

Agenda:
Lenin’s letters

The Central Committee decided to call a meeting shortly to discuss tactics. Comrade Stalin propos-
es that letters be sent to the most important organizations and that they be discussed. It is decided to
postpone to the next meeting of the Central Committee.
The following question was put to the vote: preservation of only one copy of Lenin’s letters.
The vote was six in favour, four against and six abstentions.
Comrade Kamenev moved the adoption of the following resolution:
After considering Lenin’s letters, the CC rejects the practical proposals they contain, calls on all
organizations to follow CC instructions alone and affirms once again that the CC regards any kind
of demonstration in the streets as quite impermissible at the present moment. At the same time, the
CC makes a request to comrade Lenin to elabourate in a special brochure on the question he raised
in his letters of a new assessment of the current situation and the party’s policy.
The resolution is rejected.
In conclusion, this decision is adopted:
CC members in charge of work in the Military Organization and the Petersburg Committee are in-
structed to take measures to prevent demonstrations of any kind in barracks and factories.

The October Revolution occurred in the following way:

Lenin came to the Central Committee. And kicking asses of so-called great leaders, forced them to
take power.
 213
213

In May 1922, Lenin was seriously ill. His last public speech took place on November 20, 1922. In
essence, Lenin’s active political life lasted only four years after the revolution. All this time he di-
rected the fight against the Entente and the Whites. He was also building socialism at the time when
there were famine and anarchy.
Lenin LED two REVOLUTIONS at ONCE!
In four years, Lenin
1) completely built the political economy of socialism, defining all its categories.
2) completed the Hegel, Engels and Marx’s theory of Communism by identifying the missing
categories.
Lenin allowed his comrades to deliver a speech for three minutes even. During their performances,
he noted the time by a stopwatch! He spoke: “Your speech was a whole 30 seconds longer!”
Lenin knew that he was alone. He alone fought for everyone, for all of mankind.

From all sides, Lenin was attacked by his comrades

The country was peasant. Therefore, most of Lenin’s comrades were petite bourgeois leaders with
bourgeois traits: an itch for money, a hunger for power, a delusion of grandeur.
There were few proletarian leaders, i.e. leaders from the working class. There were no such people
as Telman at all.

Neither Trotsky, nor Bukharin, nor the others were theoreticians. They were dull, lacking in under-
standing, with delusion of grandeur. Lenin led all of them forward, and they shortened Lenin’s life.

How could one person perform such a formidable challenge? How could one person lead two revo-
lutions in the face of a dying state? It is more than the human can bear. Lenin is not a human being.
Lenin is the GOD of the REVOLUTION!

Lenin wrote his fifty five books in philosophical language. These books are philosophical and
political scientific works containing theorems of dialectics.

Proof. Lenin’s theorem.

“And at best it is an evil inherited by the proletariat after its victorious struggle for class supremacy,
whose worst sides the victorious proletariat will have to lop off as speedily as possible, just as the
Commune had to, until a generation reared in new, free social conditions is able to discard the entire
lumber of the state” – Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, Selected Works, Vol. 18, pp. 53-54.
Discussion. Lenin declared the socialist state EVILP! Was Lenin right? After all, the socialist state
taught people and brought up millions of scientists. The socialist state saved humanity. And Lenin
upped and severely criticized it.
Lenin is always right. Lenin is a great political philosopher. And his word EVILP is a philosophical
category, not a literary expression. Therefore, we put the indice of the category EVILP.
And what is the difference between philosophical categories and ordinary words?
Lenin’s theorem. Philosophical categories are the broadest.

EVILP as a philosophical category

Juridical evil Political evil Pedagogical evil Psychological
evil
Murder, COMMAND or instruction from a head Forced learning Forcing a child to
sexual teacher is the worst COERCION against brush teeth
214 214

assault teachers.
An order of the general secretary is also
EVIL. This is violence against the com-
munists.

Example 1. Mother took the child in her arms and carried him to take a bath.
Did she do EVIL? From the viewpoint of philosophy, she did. No harm done if she did it one or two
times. This is not evil, but the communication between the mother and her child. If she behaves in
this way many times, then the child will grow up weak-willed.

Under the theory of communism, DISCIPLINE is EVIL. And discipline will be destroyed under the
theory of communism and replaced by SELF-DISCIPLINE (Lenin).

Example 2. Under socialism, teachers forcibly keep D-students after school and worked with them.
The teachers did a great job spending their time helping children. They did the right thing in the
context of socialism. But from a philosophical standpoint, teachers committed philosophical (not
political, not juridical) pedagogical EVIL. But this pedagogical EVIL was necessary at that time.

And what is not EVIL from a philosophical standpoint? An IDEA is not evil.
Theory of communism. Under communism, people can be controlled but by the means of emotions
and IDEAS. This can be done only through personal example “DO AS I DO”, not as I commanded.
Under Lenin, the socialist state is a philosophical EVIL. Any COMMAND or instruction is vio-
lence under the theory of communism. The goal of communism is to destroy COMMANDS.
And what form of the philosophical EVILP of the socialist state will come out under socialism?
Pedagogical evil will; everything is all right then. But even in this case, the socialist state will turn
towards capitalism at the end of track. It will reverse. Perestroika meant that the socialist state had
fulfilled its historical role. It got old. Ancient Rome and the socialist state died of old age.
Perestroika proved that Lenin was right. But Lenin is always right, because he worked under the
theorems of Hegel’s dialectics. During perestroika in the USSR, capitalism was built by the STATE
itself. According to Marx, the state is a machine. And it reversed.
Perestroika meant that the time had come for a communist revolution, not a socialist one. The Rus-
sians were one step away from pure communism. It was necessary to abolish the socialist state and
set up a global Commune.
According to Hegel, the abolition of the state is understood as the abolition of MONOCRACY, but
not the destruction of the army or the police. The army and police will become Communes.
Lenin: “Such an army is possible”. Lenin’s work “State and Revolution”
It means that communism is possible in a single state. But what about Marx’s idea of a worldwide
communist revolution? According to Marx: if conditions are suitable in many countries, then a
chain reaction is likely to start.
At the meetings of the Leninist party, soldiers and generals addressed each other informally. They
were equals, they were brothers. Addressing each other formally was prohibited by Mehlis’s special
decree.
Heroism of Lenin
On the morning of August 30, 1918, Uritsky was killed. The left Socialist-Revolutionaries, who
were part of government, began the hunt after Lenin. The chairman of the Cheka (The All-Russian
 215
215

Extraordinary Commission) was Dzerzhinsky. The left SRs were his deputies and they arrested
Dzerzhinsky during the uprising.
Lenin’s relatives and comrades dissuaded him from giving a speech that day. But Lenin was ada-
mant about it and went to face certain death.
On August 30, Lenin gave a speech unguardedly! After performance he was wounded. Lenin’s her-
oism shook the Russians to the core; they realized that they had a great proletarian leader. Brave
men, Stepan Razins, began to join the party. The net result is that socialism won due to Lenin’s her-
oism. After all, the size of the party is unimportant. Nothing matters more than great fighters, Ste-
pan Razins.
The first attempt on the life of Lenin

For the first time, the SRs sent a socialist-revolutionary worker to kill Lenin. The socialist-
revolutionary worker stood next to Lenin and had a chance to fulfill an order. But he did not shoot.
The SRs asked him why. His reply was as follows: “I could not take away the God from two thou-
sand of my comrades”. From that moment on, the Socialist-Revolutionaries have ceased to trust the
SR workers.
Death of Lenin. Lenin: “I am the same as EVERYONE”

Lenin was dying, but he did not eat delicacies. Why? Lenin: “I AM THE SAME AS EVERYONE”.
However, he ate good food one of these days. The next moment, Nadezhda Krupskaya, his wife,
entered. Lenin started crying with shame. He sweared himself.
He told himself: “Shame on you! You led Stepan Razins to the battle for EQUALITY and COM-
MUNISM. And when at death’s door, you immediately began to eat delicacies”.
Communard!
If you cannot understand Lenin’s theory of communism through the example of his life, then study
it through the example of his death.
The leader did not want to save his perishing life. He knew to whom his mighty but primitive Ste-
pan Razins would be handed over. They would be handed over to the so-called intellectuals-leaders.
Lenin introduced uniform for soldiers and generals. Lenin built a commune-communism YOU ARE
the SAME as EVERYONE.
During perestroika, it was possible to build pure communism in the USSR as follows:
1. To destroy the position of general secretary.
2. To abolish the Politburo.
3. To declare the Central Committee of the Party a PARTY COMMUNE. To resolve issues by
COLLECTIVE CONSCIOUSNESS, not by COMMANDS.
Consequence
All authorities would be reorganized under Lenin’s scheme of semi-state and semi-commune. A
peaceful transition to communism would occur. Labour productivity would increase. A faith in pure
communism would be born.
Under Lenin’s scheme of semi-state and semi-commune, not a single chief should be fired in semi-
socialism and semi-communism. Elections are not needed. Production relations should be replaced
by human relations at every level of management.
According to Lenin’s scheme, theft and delusion of grandeur are impossible. People should turn
from robots into people. A new evolution will begin, i.e. the human evolution.
216 216

But Lenin is forgotten. All left-wing parties gave up on him. Not a single left-wing party in Russia
wanted to be called Leninist and insert Lenin’s name in the name of the party. Parties are not Lenin-
ist, therefore there is not a single working person in all the left-wing parties of Russia.
Only two websites are dedicated to Lenin on the Internet!
Under Marx, socialist COMMAND production relations outlived their usefulness. They must be
replaced by communist production relations, which are ordinary human relations. It is necessary to
communicate with the help of emotions, logic and IDEAS. People are not robots.
Example. Try to interact with your wife like this: “Wife, wash the floors. Cook dinner. Undress and
go to bed”. In a short time, she will pour a plate of soup on your head.
Under communism, communication with your brothers should be the same as with your wife: gen-
tly, persuasively.

And hundreds of thousands of left-wing theorists cannot understand this. Why? The reason is that
the left intelligentsia exploits the COMMON PEOPLE through an unfair DIVISION OF LABOUR.
Therefore, all their thoughts are exploitative. Marx’s theorem “Social being statistically generates
social consciousness”.
Hegel is right: “The rigid division of labour must be abolished. It is necessary to replace the meta-
physical division of labour with a dialectical one, i.e. with VARIABLE.
The first embryonic communist (non-socialist) revolution in Russia was in 1874. It is called
GOING to the PEOPLE for MANUAL LABOUR.
Marx’s theorem. With the emancipation of labour, EVERYONE will become a WORKER!
And productive labour will cease to belong to a certain class. Marx. Civil War in France.
Lenin: “The intelligentsia is a bourgeois stratum”.
Consequence. Therefore, even the left-wing intelligentsia has a bourgeois consciousness and a
nega-tive attitude towards the ideas of equality and communism. The left intelligentsia believes that
the COMMON PEOPLE should serve them throughout the thousand years of the new socialism.
They turn up the thumbs on eternal slavery. They are worse than priests who promise equality in
Kingdom of Heaven. The left intelligentsia does not promise equality even in the communist para-
dise.
The intelligentsia exploits COMMON PEOPLE by means of the unfair division of labour. It devel-
ops its talents on the backs of the working people.
Under communism, the intelligentsia will have to become SCIENTISTS-WORKERS and head over
to SELF-SERVICE: to wash their toilets and work in the canteen in turn.
We have to prove logically that the Going to the People (1874) had the features of a communist
revolution, not a socialist one.
Answer. The revolutionary youth realized that the INTELLECTUALS are the exploiters of the
working people.
Pyotr Lavrov, a Russian theorist of populism: “Intellectuals, return the favor to the people!”.

Wikipedia
“The youth of St. Petersburg was overflowing with energy and fired up by their great expectations
and sense of misson. Everyone was overtaken by a ferocious thirst to dissociate oneself from the old
world and dissolve in the element of the people in the name of its emancipation. People trust their
 217
217

great mission implicitly, and there was no earthly reason to call in question this belief. It was ‘a
kind of purely religious ecstasy’, wherein rationality and sober thought no longer had any place.
And this collective excitement grew continuously until the spring of 1874, when a real, truly cru-
sade to the villages of Russia began from almost all cities…” (from the memoirs of N. A. Charush-
in).
“To the people! To the people!”. There were no dissidents. Everyone agreed on the need for stu-
dents to take up a manual trade before going ‘to the people’. They must also be able to turn into a
working man, a craftsman. Hence there was the increase in the organization of all kinds (carpentry,
shoemaking, blacksmithing, etc.) workshops, which began to grow throughout Russia like mush-
rooms after rain from the autumn of 1873. Then it got to the point that those who wanted to finish
their education, even being in their 3rd or 4th year, were called traitors and scoundrels. Workshops
began to grow in place of schools.
The most important is:
“Before ‘going to the people’ it is necessary to acquire skill in a manual trade, i.e. BE ABLE TO
BECOME A WORKING PERSON”.
Coming to the peasants with propaganda is called coming for tea-drinking. Under the communist
revolution, propaganda of the revolution is prohibited. There can be only SELF-PROPAGANDA
(Lenin’s category). The propaganda of the revolution by left-wing intellectuals is actually counter-
revolution. After all, they call the people to the revolution to drive out the capitalists.
The future communist revolution is the SECOND GOING TO THE PEOPLE for MANUAL LA-
BOUR. We will not leave the people anymore.
The thoughts and actions of that great Russian revolutionary youth are applicable for the program of
the future revolution.
Communism slogan is INTELLIGENTS! RETURN the FAVOR to the PEOPLE!
The great leaders of the future revolution should BE the FIRST to go to the PEOPLE
(for two days according to variable division of labour).
But the first great communard is already standing on the battle field. The Great CHE GUEVARA
returned with the Second Coming. He went to the people first. He was a minister, but worked as a
worker on weekends. He had 14 working professions.
The Hegelian triad:
The Going to the People of 1874. We all came out of the people. The Second Going to the People.
the NEGATION of the NEGATION!
The Going to the People was led by the organization named the GRAND PROPAGANDA SO-
CIETY, which was a party Commune. This organization did not even have its own CONSTITU-
TION. Constitutions are for robots. And they are great people. They did not have general secretar-
ies. Moreover, they expelled people with delusion of grandeur. The grand propaganda society is the
embryo of the future Communard Party Commune.
The Hegelian triad:
The embryonic Party Commune of 1874 is the Party of the Soviet Union in the form of a machine
(except for Lenin’s stage), the future Communard party. the NEGATION of the NEGATION!
218 218

The Going to the People of 1874 has no analogues in the history of mankind.
The boys and girls of that time were divinely intelligent and very naive. They wanted to build com-
munism quickly, and did not know that 150 years of fierce battles were ahead: great victories and
terrible defeats. And tens of millions of their grandchildren will fall in battle.
The source: http://chtooznachaet.ru/xozhdenie-v-narod.html
The best book about the populists is “Crusaders of Socialism”, Troitsky N.A. – Saratov: Edition of
Sarat. un-ta, 2002.
The title of the book couldn’t have been worse. Students left their studies at Moscow University and
became workers. Do they look like crusaders? Nothing in common.
Lenin’s communist, non-socialist revolution.
Lenin led a real communist revolution. He introduced the ideology of EQUALITY into the party.
Then 1,000 communes were created.
There were thousands of street children in Russia after the Civil War and the World War I. Many of
them were criminals. Communes for street children began to be created by order of Lenin. Felix
Edmundovich Dzerzhinsky was director of the All-Russia Extraordinary Commission to Combat
Counter-revolution and Sabotage – usually known as the Cheka. In 1927, Makarenko was appointed
as the head of the Dzerzhinsky labour commune, an orphanage for street children. Lenin was an idol
(and so were Marx and Engels) for Anton Makarenko. Makarenko spent every penny he earned –
searching for Lenin’s works. And that is why he managed to build a real scientific Commune of
young criminals. 5,000 people passed through the Makarenko Communes.
Logical analysis of the Makarenko Commune

The principle of dialectics: THE DIVARICATION of the ONE. The first theory of power under
pure communism. In the Makarenko Commune, there was a division of power into two: opera-
tional power – strategic power. So, Makarenko created a dialectical pair.

Theory of Power
Theory of Control
under pure communism, not socialism
Strategic power Operational power
Strategic control Operational control
The power of the general meeting The power of the duty officer
The general meeting Dispatching
Absolute power. The dispatch operator is Stalin, but he is temporary, for one
week.
The dispatch operator is Stalin, but dialectical. Stalin is al-
legedly Stalin. He is a temporary dictator.
 219
219


The Law of Identity of Communes: “All communes are identical”

There are no two different mathematics or two different political economies. Therefore, all Com-
munes are identical from the standpoint of political economy. For that reason, the General Staff
Commune will function in the same way as the Makarenko Commune. Here is a description of the
General Staff Commune on the example of the Makarenko Commune.
Preface. The whole army is a commune. Lenin: “Such an army is possible”. Lenin’s work “The
State and Revolution”. Generals and soldiers wear the same uniform and eat the same food. They
have the same salary and apartments. Generals also wash the toilets and work in the dining room.
There is no exception in the theory of communism. Lenin: “I AM the SAME as EVERYONE”. Ex-
ception is considered treason to communism. EQUALITY GENERATES BROTHERHOOD. There
are fraternal relations between soldiers and generals.

Army Commune
The General Staff Commune
Power in the Commune
Strategic power Operational power
Power of the Commune of Generals Power of the General on Duty
The army is ruled not by soldiers, but by a col- The General on Duty is temporary (kind) Stalin.
lective – a commune of Generals.
If there are twenty Generals in the Commune, All generals and the whole army obey the Gen-
then the general meeting of twenty Generals is eral on Duty. If the General on Duty shouts
the highest strategic authority in the army. The “War”, then the whole army and generals will be
general meeting is the highest authority only on the move. There is no one higher than the
when 80% of the Generals are present at the General on Duty in the country.
general meeting.
The dialectical contradictions in a dialectical pair
The Commune of Generals can only replace the The General cannot change the command of the
General on Duty when the generals are gath- General on Duty alone. It means that the General
ered together. on Duty is above him when he is alone.

The second theory of power under pure communism. According to Hegel’s idealism, IDEA (not a
person) will rule under communism.
The striking example:
The Law of the Commune. The general meeting can be started only by the duty officer of the com-
mune. So Makarenko has no right to start the general meeting.
The communards did not let the People’s Commissar on the podium!
In those years, it was the same as not letting Stalin on the podium.
Why did not the Communards let the People’s Commissar on the podium? Answer: The dictatorial
power of the duty officer of the Commune expressed the OPERATIONAL POWER of the future,
real communism.
Makarenko Commune was a Commune of leaders
Every communard was the commander of a temporary detachment and was infected with the ideol-
ogy of Russian communard leaderism.
220 220

A real commune can only be a Commune of Leaders. And that is why the Makarenko Commune is
the first scientific commune in the history of mankind.
Theory of inversion. Inversion of people and ideas.
There were permanent detachments and permanent commanders in the Makarenko Commune. And
it is bad as permanent commanders can seize power, and it will be the end of the Communards.
Hegel is actually right. The leader is always right. The idea of Communism (not socialism) won in
the Makarenko Commune. And the ideology of commanding became despised and insignificant.
The Commune was controlled by a Council of Commanders of Permanent Detachments between
general meetings. But any member of the detachment instead of a permanent commander could
come to the Council! And who came? Who had an IDEA! There is inversion of people and ideas in
the Makarenko Commune.
Cleaning the toilet in the Makarenko Commune. Repetition of Labour of Heracles.
There was a big cleaning in the commune before the holidays. Only the best detachment could do
the dirtiest work. Since cleaning the toilets was the highest honor to be earned. Only Great Leaders
could clean toilets. Only the best detachment had the right to clean the toilets. The rest of the de-
tachments did not deserve this great work.
The second coming of Heracles. Heracles rerouted the rivers Alpheus and Peneus to clean out the
Augean stables. And the great leader of the communards is the new Heracles, so he should clean out
the idea of elitism by cleaning public toilets. According to Hegel, if DARK IDEA is killed, it is a
victory. All elite classes will also be flushed down the toilet.

The success of the Commune.

1. FED cameras were exported.
2. The productivity of labour of former street children was much higher than the productivity
of labour of socialist workers. Communism defeated socialism.

Here is a summary of the results

1 Dialectical pair of power: strategic-operational
2 Variable division of labour
3 Commune of leaders
4 Inversion of people and ideas.
5 Labour of Heracles. The second coming of Heracles.

The Makarenko commune was created by “terrible” Chekists (agents of the Cheka). Makarenko: “I
met real communists in the Cheka”. Chekists defended the Makarenko commune, intercepted de-
nunciations. Makarenko would not have lasted even a week without the Chekists.
Did the Komsomol members of the Central Committee of the Komsomol destroy the commune?
Everything is the opposite! Why? The country was peasant. And most of the Komsomol members
were the children of peasants. The peasants do not rely on their brains; their main goal is to execute
orders in full obedience.
The pyramids of Egypt are monuments to all the great statesmen: Ramses, Frederick the Great, Sta-
lin. The state is power, the organized power of millions. The state is the great Egyptian pyramids of
power, created from living people.
 221
221

The judgment of Komsomol members to the Makarenko Commune
The Makarenko commune is not a Soviet system, so it must be destroyed.
And Komsomol members are right. The Makarenko commune is not a socialist system. It is not a
pyramid of power.
Why should it be destroyed?
The Communards do not go into the pyramid. They destroy the pyramid. They are enemies. The
power of the Commune is in the IDEA. And the IDEA is something ephemeral. The peasants can-
not realize the power of the Idea. They consider variable constructions weak and insignificant and
the dead pyramid seems to them omnipotent.
Their thinking is metaphysical, not dialectical.
Khrushchev’s Communist Revolution
1. Khrushchev followed Lenin. He understood that socialism is limited. Khrushchev’s course
on communism was correct, so he continued the course of Lenin-Marx. The main reason for
the defeat of socialism is the rejection of pure communism. Socialism is a system with a
very short lifetime, so you goeither backwards or forwards. But if you do not go forward to
pure communism, you goback to dirty communism.
2. The course towards pure communism stimulated work on the theory of communism. And
those wonderful books that we have are the merit of Khrushchev.
3. Khrushchev saved the left-wing movement in Russia. Communism is incompatible with the
torture and murder. The truth about 1937 had to be revealed. If there was no Khrushchev,
there would be transition of Russia and other countries of socialism to capitalism anyway.
But if the truth about 1937 had been revealed at the beginning of perestroika, then the left-
wing movement would have come to the end.
But Khrushchev published only part of the truth, what was right. Otherwise, there would be
a new 1937 (Khrushchev’s words).
4. Khrushchev wanted to build communism, but he did not understand that communism is a re-
jection of monocracy, and a transition to collective life. Khrushchev did not understand that
communism would abolish him.
5. Khrushchev wanted to destroy the army shoulder marks. And he was right: everybody
counts or nobody counts.
An attempt to solve the SECTOR-TERRITORY problem.
The problem of cross-hauls in the USSR: one ministry transports concrete blocks from Moscow to
Leningrad, and another ministry transports the same concrete blocks from Leningrad to Moscow for
decades!
And it is impossible to organize an exchange, although the exchange is beneficial to everyone.
There will be no need to transport blocks at all. Why is it so?
The SECTOR dominates the TERRITORY under capitalism and socialism. The sectoral system
dominates the territorial system. Such a phenomenon is described by a metaphysical pair:
222 222


The theorem of philosophy. The exclusion principle. Two categories cannot fully manifest simulta-
neously; one category excludes the other at every moment of logical time in a metaphysical pair.
The situation is the same in a dialectical pair. However, pay attention to the word “FULLY”.
Consequence. Only the SECTOR is in the foreground under capitalism and socialism. The territory
category is almost invisible. Therefore, the SECTOR category is in capital letters, and the territory
category is in lowercase letters.
The ministries of the USSR are huge political economic machines that rotate at high speed. Interac-
tion is impossible without a theoretical solution to the problem.
Khrushchev saw the problem of cross-hauls. And he decided to break the sectoral management sys-
tem and approved the territorial system. Sovnarkhoz (Regional Economic Soviet) was created in
each region, and the sectoral enterprises were subordinated to the territorial authorities. Khrush-
chev’s metaphysical pair began to look like this:

However, a new trouble arose. Now sectoral systems began to deteriorate.

Khrushchev’s experiment ended sadly for him. He was dismissed.
The cause of the death of socialism is that any state is a metaphysical system. There are no dialecti-
cal states.
Marx-Engels theorem. Social being statistically generates social consciousness.
Consequence. All chiefs of the enterprises and ministries are METAPHYSICIANS, they cannot de-
velop dialectical thinking. Dialecticians can be only theorists. Socialism was destroyed by the met-
aphysicians.
This fact is clear in the example of Khrushchev. After all, it is obvious that it is necessary to organ-
ize the interaction of the sector and the territory. But one category excludes the other for the meta-
physicians. And the metaphysicians see only one category.

Hegel’s solution to the problem SECTOR-TERRITORY.

It is necessary to create a dialectical pair:
 223
223


For this we need:

1. Make both categories dialectical, i.e., living, i.e., variable:
2. Organize the unity of these categories.
3. Organize the struggle between these categories. But the struggle must be dialectical, not
metaphysical.
4. In this dialectical struggle, categories will win each other in turn. TRANSITIONS will start:
sector 1o territory 1o sector 2o territory 2o sector 3o territory 3o …

Lenin posed a problem TERRITORY-SECTOR!

Did Lenin know the solution? Did God know that he was a god? He did. Lenin was a dialectician.
Lenin knew everything. He knew the solutions to all the problems, but he had no assistants from the
proletarians. The country was peasant and illiterate. Eighty percent of the people could neither read
nor write. There was no Thälmann with his literate workers.
How can Hegel’s dialectics help to solve the problem sector-territory?
The principle of equality of categories in a dialectical pair: Categories are equal.
The principle of the opposition of categories in a dialectical pair: Categories are opposite. And it
means that the categories in the dialectical pair are qualitatively different from each other.
Consequence. The TERRITORY management should be different from the SECTOR management.
A practical solution to the problem of TERRITORY management.
At the regional and city level
1. 5% of money, machines, labour-power, and materials are withdrawn from all enterprises.
2. All received money and machines are combined.
3. A congress of directors of all enterprises of the region or city is assembled. All of them unite
into a single territorial collective firm.
4. The collected money, machines, and materials are transferred to this huge territorial firm, to
the collective property of all directors. In other words, money, machines, and materials are
returned to directors of all enterprises.
5. Moreover, the region or city supplies its own huge resources: money, labour-power, mineral
deposits. Another very important aspect is that scientists from universities can come from
the city or region to unify science and production. Plus, legislative assistance.
6. Who manages this firm territory?
Answer: it is impossible to manage such a firm on the principles of MONOCRACY. The di-
rectors will not obey and the firm will be finished. So, it is impossible to apply socialist or
capitalist forms of management. Management should be collective.
How many votes can each director have? There are two options:
224 224

1. The bigger the factory, the more votes the director can have. Such a system can work under
capitalism, not under socialism. Why? Small enterprises will leave and bring great loss.
2. Each director has one vote. Will then the directors of large enterprises leave? No, they will
not. They will take advantage of it. Besides, the influence of large enterprises in solving real
problems will be great. Thus, a collective territorial firm can exist only on the principles of
communist equality.
At the state and USSR level.

1. 5% of all resources are withdrawn from all ministries of the USSR. Resources are combined.
2. An assembly of all ministers is organized.
3. A territorial collective firm is created.
4. Resources are returned to the ministers for collective use.
5. The Supreme Council and the Senate provides their capabilities. And they are huge.
6. A communist management system is introduced on the principle of equality: one minister has
one vote.

Why did not the leaders of the USSR find such a solution? There are two reasons:

1. Leaders are metaphysicians.

2. They are thing fetishists, i.e., pyramid-headed. Their brains are pyramid shaped.

The Stalinists shout: “Stalin, Stalin!” But in fact they shout: “State, state, pyramid, pyramid!” So
Stalin is the personification of the pyramid.
For thirty years Russian left-wing parties have been fighting for the second socialism. Their slogans
are: “Pyramid, pyramid! We are building into a pyramid”. But it is useless. The pyramid is not
growing. The times of the Egyptian pyramid of power have gone down in history. The socialist idea
is dead. The word “comrade” disappeared from the Russian language. Nobody uses this word any-
more. Comrade is a half-brother in the Leninist duality of socialism. The comrade can die for you,
or kill for failure to obey the command.
There will be no comrades, but there will be brothers under communism. And the day will come
when all will shout “BROTHERS”. After all, the future communard revolution is the last BROTH-
ERHOOD on planet Earth.
What would give the solution to the problem of SECTOR-TERRITORY for the economy of the
USSR?
It would double the economy of the USSR.
The Cause of the Great Terror in 1937. Hegel’s idealism
Here is Hegel’s method of work. Hegel proved various theorems with the help of IDEALISM.
Hegel’s theorem. All categories are living beings.
1. They are born, bloom and die.
2. Each category strives to reach the pinnacle.
Categories are born in the form of embryos. Then the metaphysical stage of their life comes: they
are cocooned, they are butterfly caterpillars. They are dead compared to the butterfly. It is the prin-
ciple of relativity. Then, finally, they become butterflies.
Consequence. Ideas die, like people do. The idea of a Republic died in the souls of people in the
West. The socialist idea also died of old age. And no one is to blame for this.
 225
225

And no one can revive the rotting corpses of ideas.
Thousands of years ago, the IDEA of a State, the Idea of a Great Machine, the Idea of a huge Robot,
the Idea of a huge pyramid was born. The Idea grew and grew and became a great IDEA. It became
an IDEA-GOD. And this Idea is the SPIRIT of the state.
Hegel’s theorem. The IDEA must be embodied.
And in 1917, the great IDEA-SPIRIT was flying over the planet and looking for a body, for great
priest. It wanted to materialize and it found Stalin, a man with a heart of stone.
The Idea said to Stalin: I appoint you as my Great Priest. Serve me faithfully and I will take you to
socialist heaven and give you immortality. You will become God and my eldest son. Build a pyra-
mid. The pyramid is my future body. Use living people as stones. The pyramid should be great and
perfectly smooth. If a man’s hand or head sticks out of the pyramid, cut it down.
Do not listen to Marx. Marx is bad. He wants to kill me. Chop off the heads of Marxists, Leninists,
and anarchists. Chop off the heads of everyone who does not want to get into the pyramid.
When you build the great pyramid, I will get my body. I will materialize. And then the universe will
shudder.
I will give birth to millions of robots, your loyal Stalinists. And you will save Russia and the USSR.
You will defeat all nations. You will be remembered for thousands of years. Your younger brothers
Pharaoh Ramses and Frederick the Great are already gods. They are immortal.
Frederick the Great stated that he was the first servant of the state. Frederick: “I am a priest of my
God, the Great Pyramid”.
Stalin, Pharaoh Ramses, and Frederick did not rule the state. A priest cannot control his God. Fred-
erick: “I am a servant of the state”. The pyramid God controls his priests and through them the God-
state fulfills its historical role.
Question: Are you trying to justify Stalin? Answer: we are logicians, we are Hegelians. We show
the laws of dialectics.
The socialist state is different from capitalist state. And therefore the above description of the Sta-
linist USSR is incorrect. Only Lenin’s theory of the duality of socialism gives a correct assessment.
The second half of the assessment of the USSR.
It is impossible to unite by force the peoples living in the mountains of Tajikistan, Siberia and other
places. There was not only a ROBOT-State under socialism. There was also the communist IDEA
of equality and brotherhood. That IDEA united the peoples into the great USSR. It was impossible
to win the Great War without the brotherhood of peoples.
The old form of brotherhood is no longer relevant. New USSR is inevitable in the form of a global
commune.
How did Hegel prove the coming of the great Stalinist state and the coming of Stalin?
Theorem. The metaphysical idea of the STATE (pyramid) is a living IDEA. And a living idea al-
ways strives to reach the pinnacle.
How did Hegel predict the death of the great socialist state, the death of the USSR?
Hegel’s theorem. The state is a metaphysical category. And metaphysics must die.
Here we apply Hegel’s method of idealism to the homosexual movement in the West.
God-homosexuality in Western countries.
The dark IDEA of mass homosexuality is flying over the planet. This Idea also wants to materialize
and reach the pinnacle. Therefore, it is looking for a body, great homosexual. The Idea says to its
226 226

great priest: “Serve me faithfully and create a completely homosexual society. All men should cut
off their penises and make vaginas. All women should sew up their vaginas and sew penises. And I
will give you immortality. And I will take you to homosexual heaven. I will make you the God of
Homosexuality”.
Hegel’s idealism.
The goal of the homosexual movement is to turn all men into “women” and all women into “men”.
That is why homosexuals conduct aggressive propaganda.
The theory of degeneration of a metaphysical pair.
1. The goal of a dead metaphysical pair is to come to life. It wants to become a dialectical pair. And
the dialectical pair is constantly inverted.
2. If a metaphysical pair cannot turn into a dialectical pair, it turns into a degenerate pair.
3. The law of inverting pair was discovered by Karl Marx.
That is the second proof that homosexuals try to turn the entire population of the country into ho-
mosexuals. God-IDEA of homosexuality wants to materialize.
The theory of the degeneration of the metaphysical pair and the law of time reversal (ALLEGED-
LY).
The first living cell was an asexual being. It was an amoeba cell. During the evolution it was divid-
ed into male and female organisms. Evolution begins to move backwards at the moment of death or
degeneration of an organism.
Consequence. The Americas and Western countries are turning into societies of asexual beings, into
a society of political economic amoebas.
Consequence. Communism is late.
The transition of women into men in dialectics, not metaphysics
The transitions of men into women and women into men will continue under communism. But
these transitions will be imaginative and beautiful.
Example. A million women fought in the Red Army for the life of the USSR. They fought face to
face with the terrible and ferocious Germans. Only girls went to the battle against the dark god Ge-
stapo (on reconnaissance).
“Warriors!” This is how commanders addressed them before mortal battles. They were real men!
Question: The IDEA of pure communism has already been here for a long time, so why is there no
communism?
1. The people of the planet are the political economic dead. They are metaphysicians. It is hard
to come to life. When the first man revives, it will be the victory. The first man will revive
the second one.
2. “Who will go first with a new communard idea?”
3. There are no grandchildren of THOR and children of Odin left. They died in the world bat-
tles. There is no one to lift the logical hammer of the new Thor.

Was a rapid transition from socialism to communism possible? The plan of Marx and Lenin.
The experiment is needed here. Take a big factory with 100,000 workers and create a Commune-
factory with shortened work week and single salary for all. Chiefs, accounting, personnel depart-
ments, secretaries, cashiers, trade unions, etc. are not needed. The workers should study and then
work.
 227
227

The fantastic superiority of the Commune over socialism and capitalism
The fantastic superiority of the Commune is due to the EMANCIPATION OF CREATIVITY. The
emancipation of creativity will lead to the birth of a COLLECTIVE BRAIN, a collective con-
sciousness. A hundred thousand people will start thinking. And one day people will generate a hun-
dred thousand ideas.
The Commune factory will explode like a huge intelligent atomic bomb. Atomic explosions also
occur in political economy. the LAW of the UNITY of the WORLD is Lenin’s favorite law.
Faith in socialism will disappear. A new faith in the global Commune “YOU are the SAME as
EVERYONE” will be born. In the same manner Marx was up to build pure communism in the Paris
Commune.
Marx predicted a world communist, non-socialist revolution. Marx means that a chain reaction of a
new communist, non-socialist idea will begin. And there will be a political economic explosion.
Marx is A CATASTROPHIST!
The creation of the great Khudenko Commune is the merit of Khrushchev. 1962-1969 years.
Wikipedia. Ivan Nikiforovich Khudenko was a front-line veteran. He became the head of the de-
partment of financing state farms in the Ministry of Agriculture of the Kazakh SSR. Ivan voluntari-
ly (!) left such a high position to realize his idea to become the director of the state farm and create
a scientific commune.
Was there withering away of the state? There was.
There was no administration. Everyone worked! The office was empty. The driver came to an
empty office, filled in an application, took a ticket and went to Almaty.
Was there a variable division of labour? There was.
The driver drove up to the excavator, climbed into the excavator and loaded his car.
It is impossible to introduce such a system under socialism. If a person works in different places,
then his labour cannot be counted, and it is impossible to pay him.
Theorem. Payment according to labour (wages) generates a rigid division of labour. Lenin per-
suaded that WAGES must be destroyed. Lenin is right. The leader is always right.
Was there the destruction of money in the political economic sense of the word? There was.
Khudenko called his system moneyless.
Was there the emancipation of creativity? There was.
The workers made many discoveries.
Was there the uprising of the idea? There was.
People were inspired by an IDEA. However, they did not understand that they were building
communism, not socialism.
People had human non-machine relations. They were brothers.
Results.
Productivity of labour increased twenty times. The Khudenko commune defeated the USA,
Germany, Sweden and socialism.
The defeat of the Commune and the death of Khudenko.
The Khudenko commune was defeated. He died in prison.
Socialism and communism are incompatible.
228 228


Wikipedia. The history of Communard. Translation of the Russian page.

The Communard movement in Russia is the last communist (not socialist) revolution. This
revolution was led by the Komsomol members.
Under socialism, people as new Cro-Magnons have not been born yet. They were in the iron shell
of the state. They were robots. Teachers addressed students by last name: “Ivanov, Petrov, Si-
dorov”. The same way they addressed each other in the Komsomol.
But time passed. The great achievements of socialism benefited people. Many people got higher
education. People changed. They did not want to be robots anymore. And there was a transition to
human relations. Komsomol chiefs and ordinary Komsomol members began to call each other by
name. Komsomol members turned into brothers.
History of the movement
In 1956, a youth association “Union of Enthusiasts” was created in Leningrad for pioneers on the
initiative of the professor of the Leningrad State Pedagogical Institute I.P. Ivanov.
Enthusiasts studied the experience of S.T. Shatsky and A.S. Makarenko, the pioneer movement of
the 1920s, and the ideas of A.P. Gaidar. The term “commune” indicated an adherence to the experi-
ence of the Makarenko commune.
There were voluntariness, collective planning, execution and collective evaluation, alternation of
creative assignments, rotation of elected leaders, special meeting with conversations (when every-
one speaks frankly about everyone, including about adult), observance of traditions, regular retreats
and summer camps for work and recreation.
In 1963 Communards came into “Orlionok”, then brand new All-Russian children’s camp on the
Black Sea cost. The camp has been designed to bring in Pioneer and Komsomol activists from all
Russian regions for an educational experience in social activism, along with recreation. “Orlionok”
quickly adopted Communards’ ideas, and became sort of a national center for dissemination of the
Communards’ movement.
The idea spread throughout the country. The largest centers of the Communard movement were in
Moscow, Leningrad, Perm, Chelyabinsk, Sverdlovsk, Tula, Voronezh, Kharkov, Kiev, Donetsk,
Odessa, Minsk, and Petrozavodsk.
The Communard movement brought up several generations of enthusiastic teachers and thousands
of schoolchildren and adolescents (mid-1960s).
Here is the song-slogan of the communards:
“There are no chiefs in the commune, the owner is collective,
and who is the chief, he is a vile, pathetic anddefective!”
Originally: «ȼ ɤɨɦɦɭɧɟ ɧɟɬ ɧɚɱɚɥɶɫɬɜɚ, ɯɨɡɹɢɧ – ɤɨɥɥɟɤɬɢɜ,
ɚ ɤɬɨ ɧɚɱɚɥɶɫɬɜɨ ɤɨɪɱɢɬ, ɬɨɬ ɝɧɭɫɧɵɣ ɠɚɥɤɢɣ ɬɢɩ!»
The commune stands against the chiefs, i.e., against the socialist state. The experience of the com-
munard movement shows that the transition from socialism to pure communism was possible.
The Communards felt that they were doing great things, but they did not understand that they were
leading a communist revolution. The goal of this revolution was to abolish the socialist state and
establish Communes. Chiefs were needed only when people could neither read nor write.
Results. There were many signs of pure communism within socialism. It is impossible to describe
all of them.
 229
229


§16.8. Lenin compiled a table of categories of political economy of com-munism. But no one
knows it!
Lenin. Table of categories of the political economy of Communism, not socialism
Hegel’s theorem Lenin’s theorem
The categories of communism are dialecti- The categories of communism start with -SELF
cal
Variable division of labour SELF-MOVEMENT (Lenin)
Variable classes SELF-ORGANIZATION (Lenin)
Variable control SELF-DISCIPLINE (Lenin)
Variable private property SELF-MANAGEMENT (Lenin)
Variable tribes SELF-PROPAGANDA (Lenin)
Variable political economic nationality SELF-PEDAGOGY
Variable political economic family SELF-MOVING (Lenin)
230 230

Chapter XVII. The contents of the author’s book V “Marx has already prepared the theory of
the CULTURAL REVOLUTION of COMMUNISM (not socialism)”

17.1. Marx’s theory of the universal man or every child is a genius

There are many books about the genius of children, but the authors’ book is the only one in the
world. We are Hegelians, we are logicians. Our book is Hegelian, i.e., logical. It is written with axi-
oms and theorems.
AXIOM No.1. ABILITIES are not BIOLOGICALLY HERITABLE. Let’s assume that this axiom
is true. Many consequences can be deduced from it.
AXIOM No.2. ABILITIES are BIOLOGICALLY HERITABLE. Let’s assume that this axiom is
true. Many consequences can also be deduced from it.
This approach led us to Marx’s theory of the UNIVERSAL MAN. Marx’s theory of the universal
man is the greatest theory of Marx. It is a PROGRAM of the CULTURAL COMMUNIST (not so-
cialist) REVOLUTION.
Thus, it turned out that the theory of communism is completely ready. And Marx has already pre-
pared the program of the cultural communist revolution.

17.2. Marx’s DISCOVERY of a new POLITICAL ECONOMIC (spiritual) EVOLUTION. We

are starting with political economic monkeys.

During the anthropological evolution, an anthropoid ape turned into a human. Human beings are the
pinnacle of anthropological evolution. But Marx declares man to be the BOTTOM of a new politi-
cal economic evolution. Marx declares capitalism to be a society of political economic animals.
Competition reigns under capitalism. People live, just like animals, eating each other. So, the people
of capitalism are noble, political economic animals from the point of view of the ESSENCE.
The people of capitalism look like people (not monkeys or wolves), but it is illusion. It is AP-
PEARANCE according to Hegel. Diogenes was looking for PEOPLE in the daytime with a lantern.
He did not find PEOPLE in the highest divine sense of the word.
Capitalism is a world of business sharks, bitches, chicks, animals (movie titles). The people of capi-
talism call themselves sharks, bitches, chicks, animals, jackals (movie titles). They feel themselves
like animals, and they are proud of the fact that they look like ferocious representatives of the ani-
mal world. And there is no movie called “HUMAN”.
So, we are starting from scratch according to Marx. We are political economic apes or even political
economic sharks, and we need to evolve again. We need to become “HUMANS”, new political
economic CRO-MAGNONS.

17.3. Marx’s theory is the doctrine of the NEW POLITICAL ECONOMIC CRO-MAGNONS.

POLITICAL ECONOMIC ( spiritual ) EVOLUTION of MARX

CAPITALISM SOCIALISM COMMUNISM
Society of political econom- Society of political economic
Society of political economic people
ic apes robots, loyal Stalinists and the
 231
231

first Communards
Society of political econom- New political economic CRO-
Half-humans, half-apes
ic animals MAGNONS
Society
POLITICAL ECONOMIC HALF-HUMAN, HALF-APE HUMAN is the new Great Cro-
ANIMAL Magnons
There is no COLLECTIVE The COLLECTIVE MIND and the
The embryo of the COLLEC-
MIND. There are terrible collective human political economic
TIVE MIND
teeth of new business sharks consciousness WERE BORN

Marx spoke twenty languages, including Russian. But it turns out that Marx is not a genius from the
point of view of the theory of communism. Neither Gauss nor Kolmogorov are geniuses from
Marx’s point of view. They are ordinary new political economic Cro-Magnons, and we are apes.
They were the first political economic Cro-Magnons, and now they lead us. Under communism,
everyone will become talented; everyone will become the new political economic Cro-Magnons. A
detailed description of the political economic evolution of Marx is introduced in the book of the au-
thors.

The authors’ theorem No.1. There is NO ABILITY. There is CONSCIOUSNESS.

No mathematical ability. There is a mathematical conscious-
ness.
No musical ability. There is a musical consciousness.
No theatrical abilities. There is a theatrical consciousness.
Results. What people think of as an ability is actually consciousness.
Theorem No.1. ABILITY IS CONSCIOUSNESS!
Theorem No.2. Consciousness is born during the social evolution.

An analogue of the law of value under communism.

1. ABILITY is the VALUE of communism.

2. VALUE (ability) is created by LABOR of increasing complexity.

Example. If a mathematician has been working at the same level for a long time, then he no longer
creates the value of communism.

Marx’s theory of the Cultural Revolution

The Universal Communist Cultural Revolution

consists of the universal will give birth to … will give birth to
consciousness
mathematical mathematical mathematical (political economic)
brain
musical musical political economic ears
revolution
dance dance political economic legs
sports sports political economic arms, legs
theatrical theatrical political economic face
232 232

biological biological biological brain
chemical chemical chemical brain
work work political economic arms

The total communist revolution will create new types of evolution: mathematical, physical, musical
evolution and so on.
Who is a brilliant violinist from the point of view of communism?
Can this violinist prove the Pythagorean Theorem? He cannot. That is not good, as here is the mod-
ern world, and he still lives in 500 BC. No mathematical consciousness, no physical consciousness.
He cannot do anything with his arms. He is armless violinist with no brain.
He is a political economic ape. He is 5% musical person and 95% political economic ape. Why?
The capitalist elite likes trained musical monkeys. Pull the musical monkey’s tail to hear Beetho-
ven’s music, and pull the second time to hear Mozart’s music. Excellent!
Communism does not need trained musical monkeys. Under communism, everyone will receive all
forms of consciousness. And they will become 100% human in the highest divine sense of the
word.
Everyone will play music under communism. Everyone will compose music and lyrics, write po-
ems, paint pictures. Everyone will develop all forms of consciousness.
The communist revolution is the SECOND TRANSITION from the political economic apes to the
NEW POLITICAL ECONOMIC CRO-MAGNONS.
This is Marx’s theory of the UNIVERSAL HUMAN of communism.
Marx’s theorem. The human of communism will develop all forms of consciousness, and will be-
come 100% human in the political economy of communism. He is the new divine political econom-
ic Cro-Magnon. There will be no political economic musical monkeys under communism.

Who will lead the mathematical communist revolution?

Mathematicians of the city will occupy the bank building, form a mathematical commune, and or-
ganize the central congress. This huge Commune will start a mathematical revolution. The goal of
the revolution is to give every child mathematical consciousness. The commune will turn mathe-
matical monkeys into mathematical people.
Physical, chemical, theatrical and sports communes will be formed. There will be a struggle, which
will give birth to the Marx’s universal human.
Each Commune will clean its places and cook its own food. There will be no slaves, no COMMON
PEOPLE. Everyone will receive higher and working education. COMPLEX PEOPLE WILL BE
BORN.

On the ROLE of the AUTHORS in the DEVELOPMENT of the THEORY of COMMUNISM

We have included only one POLITICAL ECONOMIC category into Marx’s political economy, and
that is it. It turns out that the theory of the leaders of mankind is grandiose, very beautiful, and that
it has been ready for 200 years. But the stupid and lazy left-wing intelligentsia exploits the COM-
 233
233

MON PEOPLE with the help of an unfair division of LABOUR. Intelligentsia is unable to under-
stand the world of dialectics and communism.

§17.4. Hegel and Marx created the UNIVERSAL (!) POLITICAL ECONOMY

Not many people will understand the meaning of the words UNIVERSAL POLITICAL ECONO-
MY, but those who understand will be shocked.
We have the following sciences: the political economy of the primitive commune, the political
economy of the slave-owning system, the political economy of the feudalism, the political economy
of capitalism, the political economy of communism. These are different sciences that do not have
any common category.
Hegel and Marx decided to create the UNIVERSAL POLITICAL ECONOMY for the entire history
of mankind.
It is necessary to give definitions and theorems that are appropriate for all societies in order to cre-
ate the UNIVERSAL POLITICAL ECONOMY. Is it possible? Is it possible to give a definition
that is appropriate for the primitive commune, for capitalism and for communism? Yes, it is!
Example 1. Marx’s THEORY of REWARD.
It is clear that there should be a reward under both capitalism and communism.
Marx’s theorem. The certain place in society can be reward for a person.
The definition of Marx is applicable for all societies, but it is necessary to describe Marx’s defini-
tion in detail for each epoch. So, we need to include additions to Marx’s definitions in each epoch.
Example 2. Definition of religion according to Hegel.
Definition. Religion is a FAITH in the IDEAL. This definition is applicable for any epoch.
Metaphysical, rigid religion is the world religions. But Hegel’s dialectical religion is the faith of
scientists in their science. There are permnent transitions in dialectics:

‫ܪܶܫܣܨ‬ଵ ื ‫ܦܰܫܯ‬ଵ ื ‫ܪܶܫܣܨ‬ଶ ื ‫ܦܰܫܯ‬ଶ ื ‫ڮ‬

Example 3. Definition of private property according to Hegel.
Definition. PRIVATE PROPERTY always means a PERSON according to Hegel.
Definition. Private property is the property of ONE PERSON.
These definitions are applicable for any epoch. They are also applicable for the theory of com-
munism.
Communism. Example. I came up with the idea of a new telescope and told my friends about it. I
came to the administration, and now five factories make my telescope.
I am a temporary, dialectical capitalist. I am a temporary owner of the workers of these factories.
They work for me. They are my temporary, DIALECTICAL PRIVATE PROPERTY.
The temporary CONTROL SYSTEM is created for the construction of the telescope. When the task
is completed, the temporary control system DIES. Communism is not a state MACHINE. The
Global Commune is a LIVING ORGANISM. Every day something is born and something dies.
234 234


MORAL of the STORY

The bottom line is that EVERYTHING has been ALREADY DONE by Hegel, Marx, Engels, Len-
in, and Chernyshevsky.
Everything has been already discovered. No one after Lenin has been able to add a SINGLE NEW
CATEGORY! No new category. The left-wing movement is zero. The left-wing movement is dead.
It shows that socialism died of old age. It is time for pure communism.
We have reached the finish line of history. Communism will be built, bypassing socialism. And
communism will be built peacefully if people follow HEGEL’S IDEALISM.
Hegel’s idealism. It is necessary to kill the DARK IDEA of elitism.
According to Lenin, “Dark ideas must be killed in OURSELVES, in our hearts”.
We have collected the categories in tables and demonstrated that categories are really evolving. Ac-
cording to Hegel, only the EVOLUTION of categories and laws (IDEAS) gives truth.

§17.5. The PROGRAM of a COMMUNIST (not SOCIALIST) REVOLUTION.

1. Destruction of the MONOCRACY (commands). Communes are formed at all levels of manage-
ment.
Example. The General Staff will be managed by the Commune of Senior Generals.
2. Marx. Destruction of money. Lenin: “The destruction of wages, the destruction of pensions”.
Unified wage of, let’s say, 1,000 dollars to each person. Generals, soldiers, priests, criminals, pen-
sioners will receive the same wage.
It is necessary to study the experience of destroying money in Federal Republic of Germany after
the war.
Here we do not need old government anymore. Any law is a division of money. If there is no mon-
ey, the laws are not needed. There were no laws in Sparta. Accountants, cashiers, banks, HR de-
partments are not needed anymore. We do not need chiefs and secretaries.
3. Marx: “The nationalization of children”. The children will be supported by the Commune. Wages
for each child can be about 500 dollars. Computers, phones, books will be free.
4. Destruction of the market and trade. Introduction of the principle of free-of-charge basis. Trade is
not needed, the parasite must be destroyed. Free meals will be at all factories, schools. Then 70% of
the products will pass by the trade.
Books, backpacks, pens, computers, tablets will be delivered to schools bypassing trade.
5. Living money must be killed. We need to break money’s legs. Under communism, it will be im-
possible to transfer money from one card to another. Destruction of all banks.
6. Transport, theaters, all kinds of education are free.
7. Introduction of a three-day working week. The other 3 days everyone will study at universities.
Universal higher and working education.
 235
235

8. Lenin: “COLLECTIVIZATION of MEALS”. Lenin: “The EMANCIPATION of WOMEN from
home SLAVERY”. Meals at factories, schools, universities are free. Why is it good? Cooking can
be automated.
9. It is necessary to organize large dining rooms on the ground floors of multi-storey buildings. The
first floors can be for clubs and meetings of the residents of the house. The apartment house will be
a new variable tribe.
10. Refrigerators, televisions, vacuum cleaners, washing machines will be free.
11. Destruction of the housing market. Nationalization of housing. All private houses will be na-
tionalized. So it will be possible to live and exchange house, but not to sell it.
Unified and open housing exchange system. Creation of a special housing fund for exchange.
12. Destruction of the car market. Nationalization of cars. So it will be possible to drive, but not to
sell it.
13. Marx’s program is the NATIONALIZATION OF HUMAN. The arms of workers, the legs of
dancers, the heads of scientists, the ears of musicians will be nationalized.
14. The program of the Cultural Revolution. Marx’s theory of the universal man.
It is necessary to organize Communes of mathematicians, physicists, sportsmen, chemists and give
them buildings, computers, meals. So mathematical, physical, sports, theatrical revolution will start.
15. Marx’s theory: “The DESTRUCTION of LABOUR”. The LABOUR category will die. The cat-
egory CREATIVITY will replace it in the political economy of communism.
The RIGHT to CREATIVITY and the duty to LABOUR.
Everyone should also engage in creative labour.
Question. Is the labour of surgeons’ a creative labour? No, it is not creative.
Definition. Creative labour is labour that is performed in free time, not working time. It is necessary
to form the Commune “Surgeon”, where surgeons will work one day a week. There they will find
something else to do. Science is mandatory. Variable division of LABOUR. All 100% of people
will be engaged in science under communism. There will be no common workers. The workers as a
class will be destroyed by the merger into the GLOBAL COMMUNE.
Communism is a system of WORKERS-SCIENTISTS.
16. Introduction of TOTAL SELF-SERVICE. Self-service will be introduced in all universities and
institutions. Scientists will cook meals and wash toilets one by one once a week. They will not have
slaves as common people. At universities people will work for 3 days as workers, and then they will
study for 3 days as scientists.
17. The intelligentsia as a class will be destroyed by the merger into THE GLOBAL COMMUNE.
Intellectuals will stop exploiting the COMMON PEOPLE with the help of a cunning division of
LABOUR. Intellectuals should also work and serve themselves.
18. Marx: “The production of communism is the PRODUCTION of HUMAN”. There will be tran-
sition from the production of things to the production of human. Communism will produce millions
mathematicians, physicists, sportsmen, artists, musicians.
236 236

Realization of Marx’s idea. We need to destroy art as a spectacle. Theaters will be turned into theat-
rical schools, which will produce millions actors. Hundreds of pupils from nearby schools will
study there. So students will develop their theatrical consciousness. The old theater buildings are
not applicable for communism. We need to build new ones with dozens of scenes where dozens of
students will learn to play.
19. Hegel: “It is necessary to destroy the permanent division of LABOUR and replace it with a var-
iable, dialectical one”.
Theater Commune. The director’s power is destroyed. His right passes to the collective. All 100%
of people are actors in the Theater Commune. Everyone is an actor, an illuminator, a cleaner, a re-
pairman, and a cook there. There is no slave.
§17.6. The power structure under communism.

City commune includes factories, hospitals, universities (not people). The factory can change its
representatives in the city commune every day.
1. Lenin: “Elections are organized on the basis of production, not territory”.
2. The central commune includes not PEOPLE, but ENTERPRISES.
3. Power is a process of factorization under communism. The FACTOR-GROUP theorem ac-
curately describes power under communism.

Example. The central city Commune.

The central commune includes not PEOPLE, but ENTERPRISES.
Enterprises in the central city Commune have
Factory No.1 5 vacancies Enterprises have the right to change their authorities at least
Factory No.2 6 vacancies ten times a day.
Why? Because the authorities are not people, but enterpris-
University No.1 6 vacancies
es.
University No.2 4 vacancies Natural inversion of people and ideas.
Hospital No.1 3 vacancies Example 1. City commune faces the issue of computeriza-
Hospital No.2 3 vacancies tion of the region. Then computer specialists come from fac-
tories and hospitals.

§17.7. The FACTOR-GROUP theorem describes the power structure under communism

Definition. Two people are equivalent to each other if they work at the same enterprise.
Theorem. The Central Commune is a factor set according to the introduced equivalence relation.
Consequence. Each enterprise is included in the factor-set (central Commune) as a whole.
There is communist equality and communist inversion theory in the factor-group theorem.
In this theorem, the correctness is proved by an operation group on a FACTOR-GROUP. All ele-
ments of the classes are multiplied in the proof. Thus, the INVERSION of all the ELEMENTS of
the group is organized.
Results. We tried to convince readers that: “The central commune includes not PEOPLE, BUT EN-
TERPRISES”.
 237
237

In fact, it is not so scary. The modern city government is mainly engaged in the parasitic division of
money. There will be no such work under communism. If there is no money, people’s relations will
become fraternal. That is the main thing. People will also change. They will become great.
How can communards win the elections? How?
Answer: Factories need to be selected. One factory can have 20 candidates; the other can have 30
candidates. The number of candidates must be large in order to oust all bourgeois parties from the
authorities.
Factories should not choose masters, chiefs, workers with delusions of grandeur.
Slogans. Do not vote for one, he is going to be smashed. Vote for the factory. Together, we are in-
vincible.

§17.8. On the scientific name of the party that builds communism, not socialism.

Name theorem.
1. The parties building socialism and the socialist state are socialist parties, not communist
ones. There were no pure communist parties except for the stage of Lenin.
2. All left-wing parties are semi-communist-semi-bourgeois according to Lenin’s theory of the
duality of socialism.
3. The pure communist party aims to abolish the socialist state. The communist party stands
against the socialist parties in the struggle for communism.
However, they work together against capitalism (according to Lenin’s theory of the duality).
4. According to Hegel’s idealism, the pure communist party should be an IDEAL PARTY. The
members of this party are united by an IDEA. There are no commands in this party. The par-
ty apparatus are the State, a machine of coercion; therefore, the party apparatus should be
destroyed in the party. Dispatching instead of monocracy. People are not robots.
5. The party building communism must be a PARTY COMMUNE. It will be born soon, and a
chain reaction of uprising of non-primitive scientific Communes will begin!

What should this party be called?

It should be called communist party. But left-wing movement call themselves like this, and they are
all socialist. They are for the state, what means they are against communism. There is confusion.
We suggest calling party communes COMMUNARD PARTY. And its members can be COMMU-
NARDS.
Question. Did Lenin name his party incorrectly?
1918. The 7th Congress of the RCP(b). The renaming the RSDLP(b) into the RCP(b).
Answer:
1. Lenin also built pure communism. He made the name of the party for himself. He did not think
he would die so soon. But Lenin forbade other left-wing parties to be called communist.
2. The decision was forced. As all the socialist parties in Europe voted for war and became pure
bourgeois parties. It had to be different.

Lenin’s conversation with the delegates of Mongolia

The third question of the delegates of Mongolia:
“Should the people’s revolutionary party turn into a communist one?”
238 238

Lenin’s answer: “I do not recommend this, since it is impossible to ‘turn into’ another party. Just
changing the sign is harmful and dangerous”.
Source: https://leninism.su/works/83-tom-44/957-beseda-s-delegacziej-mongolskoj-narodnoj-
respubliki.html
https://leninism.su/ is the only one site in Russia dedicated only to Lenin. All left-wing sites of Rus-
sia abandoned Lenin.
The danger that Lenin spoke about happened.
1. The left-wing parties are called communist, but they are socialist, i.e., semi-bourgeois, semi-
communist. And in fact they have nothing to do with communism, Marx, and Hegel.
2. They have misled the working class of the entire planet.
3. They call socialism with cleaners a fair communist system!
But the poop of the general secretaries also smells like the poop of capitalists.
Lenin’s theorem of the duality of socialism is applicable to all the left-wing parties on the planet.
All left-wing parties have bourgeois features.
1) They all stand for a socialist state, which is a machine of coercion.
2) They are all against real equality, i.e., pure communism. They cannot fight for equality,
since there is no words “Real equality” in their programs.
Hegel’s theorem. The principle of equality is incompatible with the state. Question. Did Hegel fol-
low the principle of equality?
3) They are against universal higher education.
4) They want to exploit the COMMON PEOPLE for all the thousands of years of new social-
ism.
5) They are against the destruction of money. The left-wing intelligentsia loves money and
cash bonuses for the title of professor or doctor of sciences.
However, a dissertation is a capital according to Marx. Past work dominates future work in
the dissertation.
6) The words “money, pension, bonuses” in their programs are more common than in the pro-
grams of some capitalist parties.

Marx, Engels, Lenin forbade all left-wing parties to insert the words “Socialist state” into the party
program.

Lenin’s work “The State and Revolution”

 239
239


Image translation: It should be borne in mind that this letter refers to the party programme which
Marx criticized in a letter dated only a few weeks later than the above (Marx’s letter is dated May 5,
1875), and that at the time Engels was living with Marx in London. Consequently, when he says
“we” in the last sentence, Engels undoubtedly, in his own as well as in Marx’s name, suggests to the
leader of the German workers’ party that the word “state” be struck out of the programme and re-
placed by the word “community”.
What a howl about “anarchism” would be raised by the leading lights of present-day “Marxism”,
which has been falsified for the convenience of the opportunists, if such an amendment of the pro-
gramme were suggested to them!
Let them howl. This will earn them the praises of the bourgeoisie.

And we shall go on with our work. In revising the programme of our Party, we must by all means
take the advice of Engels and Marx into consideration in order to come nearer the truth, to restore
Marxism by ridding it of distortions, to guide the struggle of the working class for its emancipation
more correctly. Certainly no one opposed to the advice of Engels and Marx will be found among the
Bolsheviks. The only difficulty that may perhaps arise will be in regard to the term. In German
there are two words meaning “community”, of which Engels used the one which does not denote a
single community, but their totality, a system of communities. In Russian there is no such word, and
we may have to choose the French word “commune”, although this also has its drawbacks.

The leaders demanded that only the “Commune” or the “global Commune” be inserted into the par-
ty program. Lenin gave the correct definition of the global Commune as the Commune of Com-
munes.

Lenin’s verdict on all modern left-wing parties

240 240


Image translation:What a howl about “anarchism” would be raised by the leading lights of present-
day “Marxism”, which has been falsified for the convenience of the opportunists, if such an
amendment of the programme were suggested to them!
Let them howl. This will earn them the praises of the bourgeoisie.
Results:
1. Lenin considers all the left-wing parties opportunists.
2. Lenin contemptuously calls the general secretaries of the left-wing party “ringleaders”.
3. Lenin calls all the left-wing parties bourgeois.
Lenin: “This will earn them the praises of the bourgeoisie”. Why? They are absolutely safe, and the
workers feel it. All the left-wing parties stink of bourgeois poop of inequality and elitism.
4. The left-wing parties must build communism mainly in their own party. They must destroy the
party machine of coercion by expelling the general secretaries and turn into a party commune. Oth-
erwise they should disappear. No third is given.
The left-wing parties confuse billion workers of the planet with the names Marx, Engels, Lenin, and
Hegel. However, in fact they are their opponents. Therefore, not a single left-wing party in Russia
wanted to be called Leninist.
Lenin was right: “The left-wing intelligentsia is a bourgeois class”. And it does not like pure com-
munism. The intelligentsia wants to exploit the COMMON PEOPLE through unfair division for all
the thousands of years of the second socialism! The intellectual class is rotten and stinks. People
need to leave this stinking class and come to the Global Commune, to workers-scientists. It is clear
that left-wing intellectuals also does not like Hegel’s theorem on the abolition of the division of la-
bour. Communism is the SECOND GOING to the PEOPLE, to the Global Commune. And we will
not leave the people anymore.
On the scientific name of the future revolution.
It should be called the communard revolution or the communist (not socialist) revolution.

§17.9. The best collection of Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Vladimir Lenin: “SOCIALISM
AND COMMUNISM”.

Edited by: V.P. Kuzmin, G.A. Bagaturia, S.E. Grechikho, V.P. Kuznetsov. Moscow, POLITIZ-
DAT, 1986, 495 pages.
This is a one-volume book. The shorter the collection, the more fundamental it is. Everything is
there. The deepest gratitude to creators.

THIS BOOK SHOULD BE REPRINTED CONSTANTLY.

Lenin: “Study, study, study communism”, not socialism!
Marx, Engels, Lenin: “Study Hegel’s dialectics”.
 241
241

§17.10. Russian way

In 1874, the first communist (not socialist) revolution was in Russia. It was called The FIRST GO-
ING to the PEOPLE. The students moved into communism.
The theorist of going to the people, Pyotr Lavrov:
“INTELLECTUALS! Return the FAVOR to the people!”
The embodiment of this great idea in the PROGRAM of the revolutionary youth of 1874:
“Be able to turn into a WORKING MAN!”
Practical realization of this greatest idea in the history of mankind by students in 1874:
Students left universities and CREATED WORKSHOPS, handicraft enterprises and worked in
them as workers!

The authors are fanatical Hegelians. And therefore we are obliged to rework Lavrov’s theory of
“Going to the people for BLACK LABOUR” with the help of Hegel’s dialectic.
The theory of the leader of the narodniks P. Lavrov “Going to the people for black labour” in Hege-
lian form.
Intellectuals! The class of intellectuals is a METAPHYSICAL, e.g., PERMANENT, e.g., DEAD
CLASS. The class of intellectuals is a dead class; it is the class of the dead. And you are the dead of
history.
Intellectuals! Leave the METAPHYSICAL (dead) CLASS for the DIALECTICAL (living, varia-
ble) class WORKERS-SCIENTISTS. And you will come alive!
Come to life the dead of history, come to life. There is a LIVING WATER of history, there is. And
the God of LOGIC, the great Hegel, boiled this living water in the cauldron of history.

Communism is the Russian way. It is paradise for humanity. Russians will return to their commune,
from which they grew up. And this is the GLOBAL COMMUNE. You will have millions of sisters,
brothers, aunts, and grandparents. And you will be happy forever. You will throw away the stinking
money. You will not sell, you will give.
The Russian way is a return to the Mother, to the Great Mother Goddess LADA (theory of personi-
fication).
And for 150 years now, Russians have been following the fiery path of communism, Russian path
to the Great Mother Goddess:
1874 – The first Going to the People.
1905 – The Russian Revolution.
1914–1918 – World War I.
February 1917– the bourgeois revolution.
October 1917– the Socialist Revolution.
1917–1922 – The Russian Civil War.
1917–1924 – Allied intervention (Entente attack) in the Russian Civil War.
England and its allies Australia, India, Canada captured the cities of Arkhangelsk, Murmansk, No-
vorossiysk, Transcaucasia (Batumi, Baku), Vladivostok, the Caspian Sea, the Baltic Sea, etc.
The United States captured Murmansk, the Trans-Siberian Railway to Vladivostok.
242 242

France captured the South of Russia: Odessa, Kherson, Sevastopol. It consists of colonial forces:
African, Algerian, Indochinese, Senegalese.
Japan captured the Far East. The intervention involved the forces of Italy, Greece, Poland, Roma-
nia, Finland, and Denmark.
1919–1920 – Attack of Poland and Latvia. Poland captured Belarus and part of Ukraine. This is a
small part of the attacks of foreign states on revolutionary Russia.
The enemy was coming from all sides to revolutionary Russia. But the revolution defeated the En-
tente. Why? Lenin: “We took away soldiers from the Entente”. Entente soldiers and sailors took a
side with the revolution.
1932–1933 – The Soviet famine.
1929–1941 – Industrialization and collectivization in the Soviet Union.
1941–1945 – The Great Patriotic War (The Eastern Front of World War II). This was not a war with
Germany. All of Europe attacked the USSR.
https://gazeta-vp.ru/soyuzniki-gitlerovskoj-germanii-voevavshie-v-vojne-protiv-sssr-kto-oni-byli/
On the Eastern Front:
Romania – 700000 soldiers. Romania is a supplier of oil for German tanks.
Finland – 340000 soldiers. The encirclement of Leningrad was impossible without the Finnish ar-
my. Finland is also to blame for the deaths of millions of women and children from starvation.
Hungary – 250000 soldiers. Hungarians near Voronezh brutalized the civilian population. And the
soldiers decided not to take the Hungarians prisoner.
Italy – 230000 soldiers.
Czechoslovakia. It supplied tanks and other types of military equipment. Czechoslovakia was an
advanced industrial power. Its excellent military equipment killed million soldiers of the USSR.
Slovakia – 36000 soldiers. SS Volunteer Grenadier Division Bohemia Moravia. A total of 70,000
Czechs and Slovaks were captured by the Russian.
The forces of Spain, Denmark, Norway, and Holland participated in the battle against socialism.
SS Panzer Division Wiking: Dutch, Belgians, Scandinavians.
SS Volunteer Panzer Grenadier Division Nederland. Destroyed by the Russians.
SS Volunteer Panzergrenadier Division Nordland: Scandinavians, Dutch.
SS Volunteer Grenadier Division Wallonia: Belgians, French, Spaniards.
SS Volunteer Grenadier Division Langemarck. Belgians, etc.

The entire economy of Europe served fascist Germany. Even France was actually an ally of Germa-
ny. Therefore, Germany could use ammunition indefinitely.
During this war the Russians and their brothers won with the greatest heroism. World War II losses
of the Soviet Union from all related causes were about 27,000,000 both civilian and military.
1945 – The end of the war. Post-war famine in the USSR.
1945–1953 – The restoration of the USSR.
1953–1970 – New industrialization. Development of science.
1970–1985 – The quiet life of socialism.
 243
243

1987–1991 – The crisis. The death of socialism. The dissolution of the Soviet Union.

Lenin’s theory of the DUALITY of SOCIALISM. According to Lenin, socialism is a dual semi-
communist-semi-bourgeois system. The state is a bourgeois, non-communist construct. The state
will always evolve towards capitalism. Any chief is a cocoon from which a bourgeois butterfly
flies. It is necessary to eliminate the socialist state and replace it with a Commune to build pure
communism.
The Russian workers forgot Lenin and his theory of communism. For a long time they considered
the socialist state to be communism. But during perestroika, the socialist state shot Russian workers
in the back.
There are thousands of nations and billions of people in the world. They all fight for themselves, but
Russians fight for everyone, for every living being in this world.
One hundred and fifty years of fierce battles: great victories and terrible defeats. This is the Russian
way to communism, to Mother Commune.
The great killer CAPITAL shoots Russians at point-blank range, and the great traitor State shoots
them in the back. This is the fiery Russian way to communism, to the Commune.

Russian Fairy Tale: The Battle on the Kalinov Bridge.

There are two worlds: the world of the dead and the world of the living. They are separated by the
fiery river and Kalinov Bridge. Kalinov Bridge is guarded by Russian heroes. The God of Death
and his servants strive to cross the Kalinov Bridge and destroy the world of the living. This battle
on the Kalinov Bridge has been going on for thousands of years between the world of the living and
the world of the dead. For thousands of years, Russian heroes have been holding back the attacks of
the God of Death.

New Russian communist mythology. Nation on the Kalinov Bridge.

Years passed, but Russian mothers have always been telling their children the same thing: “Our
children! We are standing on the Kalinov Bridge. We were born on the Kalinov Bridge. We will not
leave the Kalinov Bridge. We will not leave our Mother Goddess alone. It is our Mother Russia”.
Our children, today your fathers are fighting on the Kalinov Bridge, but tomorrow you will fight.
“Study, study, study communism” (Lenin). Become geniuses and become equal to the gods to fight
Capital and the state (command).
They are not people, they are immortal dark gods. They kill the millions. Dark gods were born
thousands of years ago and are going to live forever. They are immortal, but you can kill them.
The dark IDEA of elitism is the soul of the dark gods. Kill the IDEA of elitism in your heart and the
immortal creatures will die.
Hegel’s idealism. We need to kill dark IDEAS, not people.
Lenin. Dark ideas must be killed in OURSELVES!

“Economics and politics in the epoch of the dictatorship of the proletariat” by Vladimir Ilyich
Lenin
244 244


Image translation: Theoretically, there is no doubt that there is a certain transition period between
capitalism and communism. It combines the features or properties of both of these ways of public
economy. This transition period is a period of struggle between dying capitalism and emerging
communism; – other words: between the defeated, but not destroyed, capitalism and the born, but
still very weak, communism.

The Theorem of Russians. Russian theorem. Socialism is the Kalinov bridge of heroic Russian his-
tory
Capitalism Socialism Communism
Hegel Metaphysics Dialectics-metaphysics Dialectics
Hegel The world of dead The world of half-dead The world of living
The world of living money The world of half-dead people and The world of living
and dead people half-dead money people and dead money
Marx
(Marx’s labour vouch-
ers)
Why did socialism die? Socialism is a transition period. When MONEY (not
Half-dead socialist money It is a bridge between the world of bourgeois) dies, people
Marx
came to life and destroyed the living and the world of the will come to life.
the Russians. dead.
“Socialism is a period of strug- When the living state,
gle”. Socialism is a BATTLE i.e., the COMMAND
Lenin FIELD between the world of the (not chiefs) dies, peo-
dead and the world half-dead peo- ple will come to life.
ple.

The Kalinov Bridge of Socialism is the fiery Russian way. The battle with the world of the dead is
the Russian fate. Everything is true in Russian legends.

Russians are neither gods nor people. They are the best of men and gods.

There are thousands of nations and billions of people in the world. They all fight for themselves, but
Russians fight for everyone, for every living being in this world. The Mother Goddess whispers
(theory of personification): “Win, sons, win!”
 245
245

§17.11. The prophecy

Hegel's dialectic is the doctrine of a VARIABLE, LIVING WORLD, that is,

pure communism. The state is a metaphysical, that is, a permanent, that is, a dead
management system.
Under communism, there will also be a management system, but it will be dia-
lectical, that is, VARIABLE, that is, ALIVE. Capitalism and socialism are META-
PHYSICAL, PERMANENT, dead WORLDS.
Earth is the planet of eight million political economic dead. The dead do not
know that they are dead (in political economy). It seems to them that they are alive.
Why is the planet now moving towards a third nuclear world war? Why is
planet Earth committing suicide? Why are the peoples and states of the entire planet
voluntarily moving towards death?
Answer. Because DYING is the work of the dead. That's the only thing they
know how to do. And they will do their job thoroughly. The dead are unstoppable.

Where is the exit? How can humanity be saved?

Hegel pointed out the road to life, the road to the rebirth of mankind. WE
NEED TO REVIVE THE DEAD. It is necessary to build a DIALECTICAL, that is,
A VARIABLE, that is, A LIVING WORLD (pure communism). Hegel's dialectic is
the doctrine of the LIVING WORLD.
Under communism, EVERYTHING WILL BE ALIVE, that is, dialectical, that
is, VARIABLE. Under communism, there will also be CLASSES, but they will be
dialectical, that is, variable, that is, ALIVE.
Under communism, there will also be PRIVATE PROPERTY, but it will be
dialectical, that is, variable, that is, ALIVE.
Hegel's dialectic AS A TEACHING ABOUT THE LIVING WORLD has been
absolutely ready for 200 years. But not a single person on the planet knows Hegel's
dialectic. The dead don't see the LIVING WORLD.

So why hasn't the LIVING WORLD of communism been built yet?

It's all about the German prophecy. The prophecy must come true. There is no
way without a prophecy.
246 246

Here it is:
"Where is the great German who will PULL OUT

THE HAMMER OF DIALECTICS FROM THE STONE OF

METAPHYSICS?"

When the prophecy comes true, then the German communist gods will return
with the second coming: Hegel, Engels, Marx. Lenin and Chernyshevsky will come
with them.
But there will be no battle, no political revolution. And what will happen? And
what is written in the German myths?
It says there will be a REBIRTH FESTIVAL (the feast of the revival of the
dead). And so it will be. Humanity WILL COME TO LIFE.
Millions of people will take to the streets. They will hug and kiss. The great
unification of humanity will take place.
Millions of people in the squares will shout: "Long live Hegel. Ɉur THOR has
returned with the second coming!" As promised to return in German myths.

Communism is a PARADISE. Communism is a LIVING PARADISE, a PARA-

DISE of the living.
Lenin's theorem. Communism, based on economics, is not reduced to it at all.
Lenin says that communism is a non-economic system. The goal of com-
munism is to defeat the economy. It is necessary to free people from the struggle for
existence, from the struggle for individual survival. According to Lenin, communism
IS an IDEAL SYSTEM, communism is a PARADISE on planet Earth.
It is necessary to tear people away from the earth and direct their gaze into the
sky, into the universe. Prometheus is Karl Marx's favorite titan. Prometheus raised
people to "look at the sky."
The historical role of humanity
The task of humanity is to defeat the God of Death in the Universe. It is neces-
sary to revive the universe and sow the universe with LIFE.
People are HEAVENLY PLOUGHMEN! It's spring in the universe, you have
to plow. We need to plow the universe and sow it with life. Let's revive Venus. Our
little brothers, microbes, will attack the God of Death. Millions dying and millions
resurrecting, they will launch biological evolution on Venus. Microbes are heat ma-
chines. They cooled the Earth. They will cool Venus and Venus will come to life.
 247
247

Lenin's theorem. Communism is a system in which there will be no trace
of the past.
Lenin says that communism is an IDEAL SYSTEM, it is a PARADISE on
Earth.
PUT IN A WORD ABOUT OUR LEADER
Lenin was wrong about Hegel's idealism. But we knew we had to follow He-
gel. And Hegel's IDEALISM must be brought to the end, to the highest point. We
have followed our beloved leader all our lives, we have always fought alongside him.
We began to tear ourselves away from various material categories, from mon-
ey, from pensions, from the principle of material interest. It was difficult for us.
Please note that we reached the highest point of Hegelian IDEALISM – the IDEA OF
A LIVING PARADISE - only when we finished this book. And it was necessary to
reach the highest point of Hegelian idealism.
Communism is an unreal system, it is a fairy tale, it is an impossible utopia.
But communism is not just a utopia. A simple utopia will never come true.
COMMUNISM IS THE ULTIMATE UTOPIA!
Hegel's theorem. EXTREMES CONVERGE.
According to Hegel, only the HIGHEST UTOPIA will win. The highest utopia
will surely come true.
To the leaders of the future of pure communism!

1. Strictly follow Hegel's IDEALISM.

2. The party program should be IDEAL, not material.
3. Communism is an IDEAL, not a material system.

Therefore, the title of the program of future communism should only be this:
COMMUNISM is a PARADISE on Earth. Communism is a LIVING PARA-
DISE, A PARADISE OF THE LIVING.
The slogan of communism. Long live PARADISE on Earth! For the PARA-
DISE of the living, for the living PARADISE. At dawn, the idea of pure communism
will rise over the planet of people rotting alive. And THE IDEA will start looking for
a BODY.
This one is weak, this one is greedy, this one is an elitist. But this young man is
just right – he is the new CHE GUEVARA. Che Guevara – 17 working specialties.
Hegel's theorem. THE IDEA should find the BODY.
The idea of a new LIVING PARADISE will flare up. And millions of people
in the squares will shout: "Long live PARADISE on Earth! For the PARADISE of
the living, for the living PARADISE. For PARADISE, for PARADISE."
248 248

People are really waiting for PARADISE. They are waiting for a new deity.
Why? Because PEOPLE are DIVINE beings.
Fantastically beautiful women of different nations. Wonderful songs of the
peoples of the planet. Some people go down to the oceans and swim next to sharks,
others study space. How beautiful young people are. Incredible dances of young peo-
ple, their smiles, happy faces, love.
People! You are a miracle of the universe, you are beautiful, you are gods and
goddesses.
But why do you live under capitalism, on this garbage of human souls and
hearts? Socialism does not suit us either. Why did the Soviet people stop supporting
socialism? Answer: "Because socialism is not a deity, not a PARADISE."
The political economic dead create dead theories and dead worlds.
Christian Paradise is the Paradise of the dead, communism of the dead.
Communism is the Paradise of the living.
We have brought Hegel's idealism to the highest point, to the highest utopia, to
the PARADISE of the LIVING. And this means that we have completely completed
the development of Hegel's idealism.
If we abandon Hegel's idealism, if we abandon communism as a PARADISE,
then the left intelligentsia will again lead the peoples into socialism. And socialism is
outdated, socialism itself has become a dead man of history. The IDEA of socialism
has died in the souls of people. The IDEA died, and socialism died. And Hegel was
right again. But the leader is always right.
The riddle of human history:
So who is
WILL HE PULL the HAMMER of DIALECTICS out of THE STONE of
METAPHYSICS (German)?

WHO WILL GO FIRST (Russian)?

 249
249

REFERENCES

1. Afanasiev V. Karl Marx’s great discovery: The dual-nature-of-labour doctrine its methodo-
logical role. – Moscow: Mysl, 1980.
2. Bulygin V.S. Heat capacity of an ideal gas in various thermodynamic processes. Moscow
Institute of Physics and Technology (MIPT).
3. Engels F. Dialectics of Nature
4. Lenin V.I. Philosophical Notebooks
5. Marx K. Capital
6. Marx K., Engels F., Lenin V.I., Collection “On Socialism and Communism”, Moscow:
Politizdat, 1986.
7. Peregudov D.V. Lectures on Physics http://www.peregoudov.narod.ru/lectures/lectures.html
8. Putilov K.A. Thermodynamics.
9. Troitsky N.A. Crusaders of Socialism – Saratov: Edition of Sarat. un-ta, 2002.

 Ivan Bourbaki

Marx’s capital is thermodynamics