Heat Exchangers design

&
inspection

Prepared by: DSc PhD Dževad Hadžihafizović (DEng)

Sarajevo 2023
SECTION 9

FIG. 9-1
Nomenclature

9-1
 FIG. 9-2
Countercurrent Flow and Co-current Flow

ln

9-2
 FIG. 9-3
LMTD Chart

9-3
 FIG. 9-4
LMTD Correction Factor (1 shell pass; 2 or more tube passes)

FIG. 9-5
LMTD Correction Factor (2 shell passes; 4 or more tube passes)

T1
t2

t1
T2

9-4
 FIG. 9-6
LMTD Correction Factor (3 shell passes; 6 or more tube passes)

FIG. 9-7
LMTD Correction Factor (4 shell passes; 8 or more tube passes)

9-5
 FIG. 9-8
Typical* Metal Thermal Conductivities, kw

Example 9-1

FIG. 9-9
Typical Heat Transfer Coefficients, U,
and Fouling Resistances, rf

9-6
 FIG. 9-10
Variables in Exchanger Performance

FIG. 9-11
Base Values for Use with Fig. 9-10(1)

9-7
 ln

9-8
 FIG. 9-12
Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger Specification Sheet

9-9
 FIG. 9-13 FIG. 9-14
Heat Exchanger Detail Design Results Propane Condensing Curve

Example 9-2

9-10
9-11
 FIG. 9-15
A Typical Pool Boiling Curve

D G

F
E

C MAXIMUM FLUX FOR

NUCLEATE BOILING
B

A
BOILING SIDE TEMPERATURE
DIFFERENCE (LOG SCALE)
NATURAL NUCLEATE UNSTABLE STABLE
CONVECTION BOILING VAPOR FILM VAPOR FILM

REGION: A-B B-C-D D-E E-F-G

FIG. 9-17

FIG. 9-16 Two-Phase Flow Regimes in Vertical Tubes

Typical Overall Boiling Heat Flux Ranges

9-12
 FIG. 9-18 FIG. 9-19
Kettle Reboiler on Column Bottoms Recirculating Thermosyphon Reboiler on Column Bottoms

FIG. 9-20
Once-Through Reboiler with Bottom Tray Feed

9-13
 FIG. 9-21
Pump Through Reboiler on Column Bottoms

FIG. 9-22
Reboiler Selection Chart

Courtesy HTRI

9-14
 FIG. 9-23
Shell and Tube Exchanger Nomenclature

9-15
 FIG. 9-24
Shell and Tube Exchanger Selection Guide (Cost Increases from Left to Right)

9-16
 FIG. 9-25
Characteristics of Tubing

9-17
 FIG. 9-26
Tube Count vs. Diameter for Triangular Tube Pitch

FIG. 9-27
Correction Factors for Number of Tube Passes

FIG. 9-28
Adders to Shell Diameter

9-18
 FIG. 9-29
Double Pipe Heat Exchanger

FIG. 9-30
Multitube Heat Exchanger

9-19
 FIG. 9-31
Typical Hairpin Exchanger Sizes

FIG. 9-32
Prefabricated Tank Heater

FIG. 9-33
Tank Suction Heater

TANK WALL

9-20
 FIG. 9-34
Basic Components of a Three Stream Counterflow Brazed Aluminum Heat Exchanger

9-21
9-22
 FIG. 9-35
Approximate Maximum Plate-Fin Exchanger
Sizes & Pressures

FIG. 9-36
Three Basic Fin Types

PLAIN (STRAIGHT) SERATED (LANCED) PERFORATED

9-23
 FIG. 9-37
Typical Fin Arrangements for Gas/Gas Exchanger

9-24
 FIG. 9-38
Brazed Aluminum Heat Exchanger Specifications

9-25
 FIG. 9-39
Heat Load Curve for a Three Stream Exchanger

TEMPERATURE DUTY DATA

9-26
 FIG. 9-40
Typical Operating Mass Velocities
Gas Processing Exchangers

9-27
Example 9-4

9-28
9-29
 FIG. 9-41 FIG. 9-42
Typical Methanol or Glycol Injection Sparge System Plate and Frame Heat Exchanger

9-30
 FIG. 9-43
Typical Gasket Material Temperature Limitations

FIG. 9-44
Typical Fouling Factors for PHEs

9-31
 FIG. 9-45
Construction of a Two-fluid PCHE

9-32
9-33
9-34
Inspection of
Shell and Tube
Heat Exchangers
 Inspection Responsibility
TEMA G-2 Inspection

G-2.1 MANUFACTURER'S INSPECTION

Inspection and testing of units will be provided by the manufacturer unless otherwise specified. The
manufacturer shall carry out the inspections required by the Code, customer specifications, and also
inspections required by state and local codes when the purchaser specifies the plant location.

G-2.2 PURCHASER'S INSPECTION

The purchaser shall have the right to make inspections during fabrication and to witness any tests when
he has so requested. Advance notification shall be given as agreed between the manufacturer and the
purchaser. Inspection by the purchaser shall not relieve the manufacturer of his responsibilities. Any
additional tests required by the purchaser, above those already agreed to, will be to the purchaser's
account. Cost for remedial work as a result of these additional tests will also be to the purchaser's
account.

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 NDE for Heat Exchanger Bundles
Non-Destructive Testing is used extensively for the condition
monitoring and remaining life estimates of heat exchanger tubing.

The tube pitch is typically a minimum of 1.25 times the tube outer
diameter which usually limits external inspection access to the
accessible outer tubes of a tube bundle. Subsequently, inspection of
the remaining heat exchanger tubes is limited to internal tube
inspection

Shell and tube exchanger tubing is inspected primarily using two

different NDE techniques, electromagnetic and ultrasonic.

Flow Flow

Pitch Pitch

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 NDE for Heat Exchanger Bundles ASME PCC 2
Article 312
Remote Field Partial Saturation Ultrasonic systems designed
Eddy Current Magnetic Flux
Eddy Current Eddy Current to measure tube wall
Examination [ET] Leakage [MFL] thickness
[RFET] [PSET]

Generally selected Generally used for Can locate and size May also be selected may be used for HE, where
for inspection of inspection of cracks in for inspection of damage may be localized, or for
nonferromagnetic ferromagnetic tubes. ferromagnetic tubes. ferromagnetic tubes. validation of other NDE results.
tubes, or those that Its sensitivity and It might not be
are slightly magnetic. However, sensitivity These ultrasonic examination
accuracy may be sensitive to O.D.
of this method can be systems are particularly suited
Note that the less than desired or defects. for CS tubes due to the lack of
sensitivity of this required and will poor for carbon steel
sensitivity of other NDE methods
method decreases require a higher tubes, and might only
for the U-bend number of tubes to be best at determining One type of system is the
the overall condition Internal Rotary Ultrasonic
portion of U-tube be inspected. It is a
of the tube, not Inspection (IRIS) system. IRIS is
bundles. quicker method than
determining individual an accurate NDE to detect and
ultrasonic methods defect location size I.D. and O.D. metal loss

Another type of system is Shear

Wave IRIS (SWIRIS) and this
can be effective for detecting I.D.
and O.D. cracks. Both IRIS and
SWIRIS require clean tubes

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 NDE for Heat Exchanger Bundles
Common tubing NDE methods for straight shell and tube heat exchanger

• Multi-Frequency Eddy Current Testing (MFECT ECT)

• Segmented Eddy Current Array (ECA)
• Remote Field Eddy Current (RFT)
• Partial Saturation Eddy Current (PSET)
• Full Saturation Eddy Current (FSET) New API Under Development
• Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing (MFL) API RP586
• Magnetic Flux Leakage Array Testing (MFA) on NDE Techniques
• Near Field Testing (NFT)
• Near Field Testing Array (NFA)
• Internal Rotary Inspection System (IRIS)
• Acoustic Pulse Reflectometry (APR)
• Tube end calliper

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 Preparation for tube bundle for ID Tube Inspection
Tube cleanliness can have a significant impact on the performance and probability of detection of some NDE
methods. The IRIS technique generally provides the most accurate data however it requires rigorous cleaning.
Electromagnetic technique accuracy decreases exponentially with tube fouling

Tube Probe Fill Factor

FF is as measure of the magnetic coupling between the coil and tube surface. Distance between probe coil and
defect has effect on signal forming, causing problems with sizing of indication
The fill factor is calculated by 𝑃𝐷 2
𝐹𝐹 = X100
𝑇𝐷2
PD=outside probe diameter TD= tube inside diameter
A large fill factor (e.g. 85%) is desirable for optimal NDE performance (70% for RFT/RFA)
d defect defect

𝑑2
𝐹𝐹 = 2
𝐷
D

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 Eddy Current Inspection (ECT)
Eddy Current Testing (ECT): Non-destructive testing method in which eddy current flow is induced in
the material under examination (inside surface of he tube).

An alternating current is applied to an exciting coil generating a magnetic current. This induced current
is then monitored by either the exciting coil or a separate pickup coil for changes.

Conventional eddy current examination can be performed in either the differential or absolute modes.
The differential mode detects small discontinuities such as pitting and cracking, whereas the absolute
mode detects localized or gradual wall loss.

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 Eddy Current Inspection (ECT) – Cont’
The magnetic permeability of ferromagnetic materials severely
limits the depth of penetration of induced eddy currents.

Saturated and partial saturated Eddy current testing for

magnetic materials to suppress the magnetic characteristics of
permeability.

Different techniques available and based on materials, configurations and

thickness; proper techniques to be selected
• ET for nonferromagnetic heat exchanger tubes
• ET for coated ferromagnetic materials

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 Partial Saturated and Full Saturated Eddy Current Testing
Partial Saturated Eddy Current Testing : Nondestructive partial saturation eddy current (using with
rare earth magnets) examination method Principles This inspection is applicable to partially
ferromagnetic materials such as nickel alloy or ferritic austenitic and thin ferromagnetic materials such
as ferritic chromium molybdenum stainless steel.

Full Saturated Eddy Current Testing : Full saturation eddy current (FS-ECT) uses a conventional
eddy current coil and a magnet. The magnetic field of the magnet saturates the material. Once
saturated the relative permeability of the material drops to one. The strength of the magnets used for
saturation is very critical in this technique. Weaker magnets will not saturate the material and will
produce a high signal to noise ratio. The application of a full saturation eddy current technique depends
on the permeability of the material, tube thickness and diameter.

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 Eddy Current Inspection (ECT) – Capabilities and Limitations

Capabilities Limitations

1. Inspection speed up to approximately 24 inches per 1. Limited to only non-magnetic tube material.
second
2. Requires a frequency mix to inspect tubing beneath a
2. Distinguishes between ID and OD flaws tube sheet or baffle.
3. Good reliability and accuracy of test results 3. Does not detect circumferential cracks
4. Can detect gradual wall thinning and localized flaws 4. Application is limited to 3-inch tube sizes and 0.125
wall thickness. Larger diameter and thicker wall
5. U-bend tubes can be inspected with some radius
materials could be inspected with specialized
limitation
equipment.
6. Permanent records can be obtained on test results
5. Test instrumentation, systems and software packages
7. By using MFECT techniques, flaws under the support could be very expensive.
plates (baffles) can be found and evaluated accurately.
6. Requires high inspection skills for data analysis and
8. Can detect axial cracks evaluation.
7. Discontinuities adjacent to end sheets are difficult to
detect.

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 Remote Field Eddy Current Testing (RFT)
Remote Field Eddy Current Testing: is quite distinct from standard eddy current testing in three of its
main characteristics

• RFT operates at frequencies typically below 1KHz; whereas, eddy current operates above 1KHz
• RFT can penetrate through thin-wall carbon steel heat exchanger and boiler tubes because of its
low frequency operation
• RFT is a pitch-catch method; whereas a sending coil transmits an electromagnetic field to a nearby
receiving coil. The resulting impedance measurement indirectly measures wall thickness.
• The RFT field passes right through the heat exchanger or boiler tube wall and far side defects are
equally well detected

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 Remote Field Eddy Current Testing (RFT)

Capabilities Limitations

1. Internal and external corrosion pits and under-deposit 1. Scanning speed is typically about half that of eddy
corrosion current technique (6-12 inches per second, but could
be slower based on the operating frequency.
2. Internal and external erosion
2. Threshold of detection is typically 20% for local wall
3. General wall loss
loss and 10% for general thinning
4. Creep damage such as thermal fatigue cracking (if
3. Accuracy is quoted at +/-15% of actual wall-loss
orientated perpendicular to the resultant field)
4. RFT has limited sensitivity and accuracy at baffle
5. Baffle wear and tube-tube fretting
plates because the plates prevent the field from
6. Hydrogen damage and water treatment chemical- traveling on the outside of the tube.
induced damage
5. Although RFT is easier to understand than ECT, there
7. Steam impingement erosion has been a lack of formal training and certification until
8. Cracking in tube wall (if orientated perpendicular to the recently. This has led to the technique being quite
resultant field) and sometimes in membranes (with operator-dependent. ASNT has recently added RFT to
special probes) its family of electromagnetic test techniques and there
are now Codes and standards governing its use.

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 Segmented Eddy Current Array (ECA)

Segmented Eddy Current Array (ECA): ECA tubing probes are designed to inspect non-
ferromagnetic tubing. Instead of coils wound around a bobbin, the ECA uses a series of smaller
pancake shaped coils that are set in various array configurations according to design.

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 Segmented Eddy Current Array (ECA)

Capabilities Limitations

1. Inspection speed up to approximately 24 inches per 1. Limited to only non-magnetic tube material.
second
2. Application is limited to 3 inch tube sizes and 0.125
2. Distinguishes between ID and OD flaws wall thickness. Larger diameter and thicker wall
materials could be inspected with specialized
3. Can detect tube flaws beneath tube sheets or baffles
equipment.
without a frequency mix
3. Requires high inspection skills for data analysis and
4. Reliability and accuracy of test results
evaluation.
5. Can detect gradual wall thinning and localized flaws
4. Tubes must be cleaned.
6. U-bend tubes can be inspected with some radius
limitation
7. Permanent records can be obtained on test results

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 Internal Rotary Inspection System (IRIS)

IRIS: is an Ultrasonic system used for inspection and measurement of wall thickness of heat
exchanger tubes

In the IRIS system, the ultrasonic transducer is contained in a test head which fits into and is
centred in the heat exchanger tube, flooded with water for ultrasound transmission.

The ultrasonic pulses are emitted and reflected off a rotating mirror into the tube wall and back
again to the transducer via the same path.

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 Internal Rotary Inspection System (IRIS) – Cont’

Capabilities Limitations

1. 100% tube inspections converge (end to end). 1. Coupling medium (water) is always needed.
2. Wall loss and pit detectability’s accuracy and sizing 2. Tubes must be thoroughly cleaned.
plus or minus 0.002 inch.
3. ID surface corrosion and deposits can significantly
3. Can examine both ferromagnetic and non- reduce test sensitivity due to the absorption and
ferromagnetic tubes. scattering of sound waves.
4. Distinguishes ID from OD flaws and at support plates 4. Test speed is approximately 3-4 inches/second. 12
inches per second high-performance equipment. Some
5. Can inspect tube sizes up to 4.0 inches (or larger with
systems cannot record the entire tube length due to
specialized equipment) with wall thickness up to 0.25
computer processing and file buffer size limitations.
inches.
5. Requires high inspection skills for data analysis and
6. Final reports with applicable software can be generated
evaluation.
instantly.
6. Cannot detect cracking, small diameter pitting or
7. Permanent records can be obtained on test results.
through wall holes.

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL)
A magnetic flux leakage (MFL) probe utilizes a powerful magnet to magnetize the material under
examination (i.e. Carbon Steel). If defects are present (corrosion or material loss), the magnetic field
“leaks” from the material. MFL probes incorporate magnetic detector(s) where it can detect the leakage
field.

Typically three sensors are used to measure the flux leakage received. The “Lead Differential Coil” is
used to detect ID/OD sharp indications. The “Absolute Coil” is part of the “Lead Coil” and is used to detect
ID/OD gradual defects. The “Trail Differential Coil” is placed outside the magnetic field to detect the
“residual” flux leakage left behind by ID sharp indications.

By comparing the information between all three coils, a defect orientation (ID or OD) can be established

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL)

Capabilities Limitations

1. Distinguishes ID from OD flaws. 1. Detectability is limited to flaws 20% and greater.

2. Can inspect ferromagnetic tubes from 0.75 to 3.5 2. Large magnets that are difficult to move.
inches in diameter and 0.120 inches wall thickness.
3. Very sensitive to inspection speed. Accuracy of test
3. Permanent records can be obtained on test results. results can fluctuate with probe speed.
4. Instrumentation can withstand adverse field conditions. 4. Poor sensitivity to tubing flaws beneath tube sheets
5. Inspection speeds of up to 24 inches/second. 5. Tubes must be cleaned. Scale or deposit can fill a flaw
which will make it difficult to qualify its depth.
6. Can detect flaws under support plates as well as flaws
adjacent to end sheets. 6. Requires high inspection skills for data analysis and
evaluation.
7. Circumferential cracking may be detected with array-
type MFL coils. 7. Longitudinal or axial flaws cannot be detected.
8. Difficult to accurately size discontinuities
9. Cannot inspect U-bend tubes.

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 U Bend Tubing Inspection
U-bend tubing can be inspected by remote visual inspection (RVI)

Each of the straight tube NDE methods can partially inspect the straight sections of the U-tube. The U-
bend itself is not inspectable by these techniques unless a special probe configuration is used.

Special probes may be found in the multi-Frequency Eddy Current, Partial saturation EC, and RFT
single exciter coil categories. Acoustic Pulse Reflectometry can detect blockage >15% of the tube
diameter or through wall holes in U-bends regardless of type of tubing material.

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 Tube and Callipers
Many tubing NDE methods have difficulty inspecting tube ends within the tube sheets due to end-effects
and tube sheet interference. Mechanical gauging of the tube ends is performed to detect ID tube end
erosion. A common gauge for this purpose is an internal three point expanding dial calliper.

Capabilities Limitations

1. Direct mechanical measurements 1. Limited measurement distance into the tube

2. Tube sizes from 0.375” to 2.00” (9.5 - 50.8 mm) 2. Measurements may be affected by tube deposits
3. Easy to calibrate 3. Relatively slow production

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 Examination of Tube-to-Tubehseet Joint (TTS)
a) Visual Examination

b) Surface examination by PT

c) Volumetric examination by UT

d) In situ replica examination

e) Helium leak test

f) Hydrotest

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 NDT Method Suitability

Material / Technique ECT / ECA FSECT IRIS RFT MFL PSEC

Non-Ferromagnetic Tube 2 4 1 4 4 4

Low Ferromagnetic Tube 3 1 1 1 3 2

Ferromagnetic Tube 4 3 1 1 1 2

Examples of non ferromagnetic tubes: Admiralty brass, 300 series stainless steels, Cu-Ni, Hastelloys, etc
Examples of Low ferromagnetic tubes: Monel, 2205 Duplex stainless steel, 2207 Super Duplex stainless steel, etc.
Examples of Ferromagnetic tubes: Carbons steels, Nickle Alloys

Suitability Rank ECT : Eddy Current Testing

1 Preferred ECA : Eddy Current Array
2 Applicable FSECT: Full Saturation Eddy Current Testing
3 Less Applicable IRIS: Internally Rotating Inspection System
4 Not applicable RFT: Remote Filed Testing
MFL: Magnetic Flux Leakaghe
PSEC: Partial Saturation Eddy Current
Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020
 NDT Method Flaw Detection Capability
Defect / Technique ECT / ECA FSECT IRIS RFT MFL PSEC
ID General Wall Loss B B A B B B
OD General Wall Loss B B A B B B
ID Pitting B B C B B C
OD Pitting B B B C C C
ID Grooving A A A A A A
ID Erosion B B A A A B
OD Erosion / Impingement B B A A A C
Cracking (Axial) A A D A A B
Cracking (Circ) C C D A A C
Metallurgical changes (De-allyoing, hydriding) B B D A A C
Suitability Rank ECT : Eddy Current Testing
A Highly Effective ECA : Eddy Current Array
B Effective FSECT: Full Saturation Eddy Current Testing
C Less Effective IRIS: Internally Rotating Inspection System
D Not Effective RFT: Remote Filed Testing
MFL: Magnetic Flux Leakaghe
PSEC: Partial Saturation Eddy Current
Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020
 Acceptable Loss and Tube Replacement
Impact on the efficiency and other operational characteristics of the heat exchanger due to the potential reduction of heat transfer area.

Duration in service

Time to next planned outage

Criticality of the exchanger (process safety or to operation)

Suspected damage mechanism

Historical failure rate (increasing or decreasing)

Potential consequence of tube failure

Accuracy and effectiveness of the inception technique(s)

For critical exchangers:

• Total replacement of tube bundle where 40% loss or more of nominal thickness
• Tube or bundle replacement where 20%to 40% wall loss

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 Calculations of Tube Minimum Required Thickness

Download Sheet from the following link:

https://lnkd.in/dqa2xTWa

Video explanation for sheet usage on YouTube:

https://lnkd.in/dPaXUCa7

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 Methods for Determining Minimum Number of Tubes to Inspect ASME PCC 2
Article 312-I
312-1-1.1 Fixed Tube Count 312-1-1.2 Tube Bundle

The following minimum number of tubes inspected should be The following areas of the tube bundle should be examined at
considered: a minimum:
a) 50 tubes or 25% of tube total, whichever is greater, for a) the first three rows adjacent to the inlet nozzle and the last
heat exchangers with a total tube count of less than 500 two rows adjacent to the exit nozzle.
tubes b) every second tube around the perimeter of the bundle. For
b) 20% of tube total for heat exchangers with a total tube multipass heat exchangers, the perimeter of each pass
count of 500 tubes or more, up to 750 tubes shall be included.
c) 15% of tube total for heat exchangers with a total tube c) a selection of tubes in the interior section of the bundle.
count of 750 tubes or more, up to 1,000 tubes d) areas with a history of active damage mechanisms.
d) 10% of tube total for heat exchangers with a total tube e) areas that have not previously been examined.
count of more than 1,000 tubes f) failure of 10% of the tubes examined shall require an
additional 10% of tubes to be examined in the examined
area, as per (a) through (e).

312-I-1.4 EVA
a) Use of Extreme Value Anlaysis (EVA) makes it possible to accurately assess the remaining life of large numbers of tubes using relatively minimal
data.

b) EVA assessment is based on ASTM E 2283, "Standard Practice for Extreme Value Analysis of Non metallic Inclusions in Steel and Other
Microstructural Features.

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 ASME PCC 2
Table 312-I-1.3-1

Inspection
Effectiveness Table

Heat Exchangers Training Course Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 Tube Plugging – Tapper Plug
• All tubes that are plugged should be pierced to provide venting and draining to prevent possible plug blowout.
Always puncture the tube before plugging

Tube

Tubesheet
Tubesheet

Friction Taper Plug to be used only when

Plug Map
• Shell side operating pressure <=1.5 Mpa

• Shell side operating temperature <=205 oC

• Tube to tubesheet are expanded not welded

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 Tube Plugging – Welded Plug
• Plugs with different shapes can be installed by welding to the tubesheet or to the inner surface of the tube

• Sometimes the plug is welded to ensure it doesn’t leak or blow out and turn into a projectile.

• When it is welded, the plug should have a material test report.

• The welding must be done in accordance with approved WPS, with care of requirements of Dehydrogenration
(if applicable) PWHT … etc.

• Mock-up to be prepared to ensure proper application and qualifications of the welders

• Plug map shall be prepared to record number of location of plugged tubes

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 Tube Plugging – Mechanical Plug
• Mechanical plugs should be considered in situations where friction fit
tapered plugs are not appropriate for the pressure and/or temperature of
service or other technical / environmental conditions.

• Mechanical plugs are typically installed by a pneumatic or hydraulic

system. Other styles of plugs may be considered for higher pressures.
Installation Video

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020

 Tube Plugging – TEMA NOTES
TEMA E-4.8 PLUGGING OF TUBES

• In U-tube heat exchangers, and other exchangers of special design, it may not be feasible to remove and
replace defective tubes. Defective tubes may be plugged using commercially available tapered plugs with
ferrules or tapered only plugs which may or may not be seal welded.

• Excessive tube plugging may result in reduced thermal performance, higher pressure drop, and/or mechanical
damage. It is the user's responsibility to remove plugs and neutralize the bundle prior to sending it to a shop
for repairs.

Heat Exchangers Baher Elsheikh – Nov. 2020