Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd
Upload
66 views

Appendixb

1. The document describes the hydrogen-like atomic orbitals that are solutions to the Schrödinger equation for an electron moving in the potential of a nucleus. 2. It provides the mathematical forms of the wavefunctions and gives explicit expressions for the n=1, 2, and 3 orbitals. 3. Key properties of the orbitals discussed include how their size, energy, and shape depend on factors like the principal quantum number n, nuclear charge Z, and angular momentum quantum numbers l and m.

Uploaded by

api-26021617
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
66 views

Appendixb

1. The document describes the hydrogen-like atomic orbitals that are solutions to the Schrödinger equation for an electron moving in the potential of a nucleus. 2. It provides the mathematical forms of the wavefunctions and gives explicit expressions for the n=1, 2, and 3 orbitals. 3. Key properties of the orbitals discussed include how their size, energy, and shape depend on factors like the principal quantum number n, nuclear charge Z, and angular momentum quantum numbers l and m.

Uploaded by

api-26021617
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

The Hydrogen Atom Orbitals B

In Chapter 1 and Appendix A, the angular and radial parts of the Schrödinger
equation for an electron moving in the potential of a nucleus of charge Z were obtained.
These "hydrogen-like" atomic orbitals are proper eigenstates for H, He+ , Li++ , Be +++ ,
etc. They also serve as useful starting points for treating many-electron atoms and
molecules in that they have been found to be good basis functions in terms of which to
expand the orbitals of most atoms and ions. In this Appendix, we will examine the sizes,
energies, and shapes of these orbitals and consider, in particular, how these properties vary
with principal quanutm number n, charge Z, and angular quantum numbers l and m.
In Chapter 1 and Appendix A, it was shown that the total r, θ, φ dependence of
these so-called hydrogenic orbitals is given as:

ψn,l,m = Yl,m (θ,φ) Rn,l (r),

where the spherical harmonics Yl,m are expressed in terms of the associated legendre
polynomials Plm(θ) as

Yl,m (θ,φ) = P l|m|(cosθ) (2π)-1/2 exp(imφ),

and the radial functions Rn,l (r) are given in terms of Laguerre polynomials of order n-l-1,
Ln-l-1(ρ) as follows:

Rn,l (r) = N n,l ρ le-ρ/2 Ln-l-1(ρ) ,

where Nn.l is a normalization constant. Here, the radial coordinate r of the electron is
contained in the variable ρ defined as

ρ = Zr/aon,

where ao is the bohr radius

ao = h2 /µe2 = 0.529 Å.

The energies of these hydrogenic orbitals, relative to an electron infinitely far from the
nucleus and with zero kinetic energy, are

E = - µ Z2 e4/2h2n2 = - 27.21 Z 2/2n2 eV.


The n = 1, 2, and 3 wavefunctions are given explicitly as follows:

n=1, l=0, m=0, ψ= (Z/ao)3/2(π)-1/2 exp(-Zr/ao)


n=2, l=0, m=0, ψ = (Z/ao)3/2(2π)-1/2 (1-Zr/2ao)/2 exp(-Zr/2ao)
n=2, l=1, m=0, ψ = (Z/ao)3/2(2π)-1/2 Zr/4ao cosθ exp (-Zr/2ao)
n=2, l=1, m=±1, ψ = (Z/ao)3/2(4π)-1/2 Zr/4ao sinθ exp(±iφ) exp(-Zr/2ao)
n=3, l=0, m=0, ψ = (Z/ao)3/2(3π)-1/2 [27-18Zr/ao+2(Zr/ao)2]/81
exp(-Zr/3ao)
n=3, l=1, m=0, ψ = (Z/ao)3/2(2π)-1/2 2/81 [6Zr/ao-(Zr/ao)2] cosθ
exp(-Zr/3ao)
n=3, l=1, m=±1,ψ = (Z/ao)3/2(π)-1/2 1/81 [6Zr/ao-(Zr/ao)2] sinθ exp(±iφ) exp(-Zr/3ao)
n=3, l=2, m=0, ψ = (Z/ao)3/2(6π)-1/2 1/81 (Zr/ao)2 [3cos2θ -1]
exp(-Zr/3ao)
n=3, l=2, m=±1,ψ = (Z/ao)3/2(π)-1/2 1/81 (Zr/ao)2 sinθ cosθ exp(±iφ) exp(-Zr/3ao)
3/2
n=3, l=2, m=±2,ψ = (Z/ao) (4π) -1/2 1/81 (Zr/ao) sin θ exp(±2iφ)
2 2 exp(-Zr/3ao).

On pages 133-136 of Pauling and Wilson are tabulated the bound-state solutions of this
problem for n ranging up to n=6 and l-values up to l=5.
The above ± m functions are appropriate whenever one wishes to describe orbitals
that are eigenfunctions of Lz, the component of orbital angular momentum along the z-axis.
The functions with ± m quantum numbers can be combined in pairs to give the spatially
oriented functions with which most chemists are familiar:

ψ+ = 2-1/2 [ψm + ψ−m ]

and
ψ- = 2-1/2 [ψm - ψ−m ].

For example, when applied to the 2p±1 functions, one forms the 2px and 2py functions; the
3d±1 functions combine to give the 3dxz and 3dyz functions; and the 3d±2 functions
combine to give the 3dxy and 3dx2-y2 functions. These spatially directed functions are more
appropriate for use whenever one is dealing with the interaction of the atom on which these
orbitals are located with surrounding "ligands" or bonding partners which are spatially
arranged in a manner that destroys the spherical and axial symmetry of the system. One is
permitted to combine the ± m functions in this manner because these pairs of functions are
energetically degenerate; any combination of them is therefore of the same energy.
There are several important points to stress about these hydrogenic atomic
functions:

1. Their energies vary as -Z2/n2, so atoms with higher Z values will have more tightly
bound electrons (for the same n). In a many-electron atom, one often introduces the
concept of an effective nuclear charge Zeff, and takes this to be the full nuclear charge Z
minus the number of electrons that occupy orbitals that reside radially "inside" the orbital in
question. For example, Zeff = 6-2=4 for the n=2 orbitals of Carbon in the 1s22s22p4
configuration. This Zeff is then used to qualitatively estimate the relative energetic stability
by making use of the - Z2eff/n2 scaling of the energy.

2. The radial sizes of orbitals are governed by the product of


exp(-Zeff r/nao), an r l factor which arises from the small-r limit of ψn,l,m , r1 which enters
because the probability density is |ψ|2 r2, and the highest power of Zr/nao that appears in
the Laguerre polynomial which is (Zr/nao)n-l-1. This product's r-dependence reduces to
exp(-Zeff r/nao) rn, which has a maximum at r = n2 ao/Zeff . So, orbitals with large Zeff
values are smaller and orbitals with larger n-values are larger.

3. The hydrogenic atom energy expression has no l-dependence; the 2s and 2p orbitals
have exactly the same energy, as do the 3s, 3p, and 3d orbitals. This degree of degeneracy
is only present in one-electron atoms and is the result of an additional symmetry (i.e., an
additional operator that commutes with the Hamiltonian) that is not present once the atom
contains two or more electrons. This additional symmetry is discussed on p. 77 of Atkins.

4. The radial part of ψn,l,m involves a polynomial in r of order n-l-1


Ln-l-1(r) = Σ k ak rk ,
and the coefficients in these polynomials alternate in sign
(ak = ck (-1)k). As a result, the radial functions possess nodes (i.e., values of r at which
ψn,l,m vanishes) at points where the polynomial is equal to zero. There are n-l-1 such radial
nodes (excluding the nodes at r = ∞ and at r = 0, the latter of which all but s-orbitals
have). A 4s orbital has 3 such radial nodes, and a 3d orbital has none.
Radial nodes provide a means by which an orbital acquires density closer to the nucleus
than its <r2> value would indicate; such enhanced density near the nucleus differentially
stabilizes such orbitals relative to those with the same n but fewer nodes. In the language
commonly used in inorganic chemistry, one says that nodes allow an orbital to "penetrate"
the underlying inner-shell orbitals.
The presence of radial nodes also indicates that the electron has radial kinetic
energy. The 3s orbital with 2 radial nodes has more radial kinetic energy than does the 3p
which, in turn, has more than the 3d. On the other hand, the 3d orbital has the most angular
energy
l(l+1)h2/2mr2 (this is the analog of the rotational energy of a diatomic molecule), the 3p has
an intermediate amount, and the 3s has the least.

You might also like