TEXT 1 - Organ Traffickers Lock Up People To Harvest Their Kidneys
TEXT 1 - Organ Traffickers Lock Up People To Harvest Their Kidneys
TEXT 1 - Organ Traffickers Lock Up People To Harvest Their Kidneys
3 Pakistani police recently raided an apartment near the capital Islamabad and released 24 people who
4 were locked inside. Brought and held there through deception and threats, the terrified men and
5 women were waiting to be taken to a clinic to have a kidney removed — unwilling participants in a
6 global phenomenon known as organ trafficking. Here are some key facts and insights about this illicit
7 activity and the efforts against it.
9 Organ trafficking — the sale and purchase of human organs for transplantation — is a widespread
10 crime. Estimates put the worldwide number of commercial transplantations — transplantations that
11 involve payment for the organ — at about 10,000 annually, roughly 10 percent of all transplantations.
12 In most cases, the organ is a kidney, sold by a living person — illegally. Many countries have laws that
13 prohibit the selling and buying of organs and ban physicians from transplanting organs obtained
14 through payment. This practice is also banned by the World Health Organization, which requires organ
15 donation to be altruistic.
17 The shortage of organs for transplantation is a persistent worldwide problem: Demand for organs
18 significantly outstrips1 supply. Consider the following statistics. As of early 2016, 100,791 people were
19 waiting for lifesaving kidney transplants in the United States. Yet in 2014, only 17,107 kidney
20 transplants took place there. That year, 4,761 Americans died while waiting for a kidney transplant.
21 Unable to obtain an organ at home, patients from rich countries might choose to travel to developing
22 countries, where they can buy the organ and have it transplanted. In the developing countries, organ
23 brokers lure poor, uneducated individuals into selling their kidney through the promise of financial
24 gain and a better future. Economic need drives most organ sellers, but in some cases — as in the
25 Pakistani case above — actual coercion is used. Such cross-border form of organ trafficking is known as
26 “transplant tourism.”
28 The organ trade typically takes place in developing countries whose hospitals are advanced enough to
29 offer transplant services. It originated in India in the 1980s; in the following years, Pakistan, the
30 Philippines, Egypt and China (where the organs were alleged to have come from executed prisoners)
31 became hubs of commercial transplants. Such illegal transplants are also known to have been done in
32 Turkey, Kosovo, South Africa and other sites. The patients typically come from the rich countries of
33 East Asia (e.g., Japan and Taiwan), the rich countries of the Middle East (e.g., Saudi Arabia and Israel),
34 as well as the United States and Western Europe.
35 But wait, why prohibit a trade that may save people’s lives?
1
1 To become larger/more important than
36 This is indeed a question that libertarians raise. They argue that legal organ sales are an expression of
37 individual liberty that would allow many patients to regain their health while financially benefiting low-
38 income individuals.
39 Yet the existing medical consensus prohibits the organ trade, based on the ethical view that human
40 organs are not a commodity to be bought and sold. It is also argued that the trade is inherently
41 exploitative, since it is the poor and vulnerable members of society who sell their organs to the rich.
42 Furthermore, kidney sellers receive only a small fraction of the $100,000-$200,000 typically paid by
43 patients and rarely experience the hoped-for economic improvement. Many, in fact, suffer a
44 deterioration of their health, which further worsens their financial problems, along with a sense of
45 hopelessness and social isolation. And patients might also be disappointed. Given the often-inadequate
46 pre-transplant evaluation and substandard medical treatment, commercial transplantations might
47 yield poor health outcomes, and put patients at a higher risk of surgical complications, infections and
48 organ rejection.
50 Compared with other illicit trades, organ trafficking should be rather easy to curb. Governments are
51 sometimes reluctant to suppress illicit activities that are economically important, such as the trade in
52 drugs or counterfeit goods. But this is not the case with the organ trade that is of little economic
53 significance, financially benefiting a small group of organ brokers and physicians.
54 Furthermore, fighting the organ trade entails limited law enforcement efforts, since it is less hidden
55 and more detectable than many other criminal activities. The prohibited transplantations do not take
56 place in back alleys, but in a few easily identifiable locations: hospitals. The physicians who perform
57 these transplantations can be easily identified, as can the patients who receive the illegal transplants.
58 Before the transplantation abroad, they are on the organ wait list in their own countries; after
59 undergoing the procedure, they must receive continuing care, including immunosuppressive drugs.
61 The problem is a lack of willingness to enforce the law: While a legal prohibition may exist,
62 governments often make little effort to stop the trade. My research identifies several reasons for that.
63 One is that organ trafficking, at first blush, does not look harmful or morally repugnant. Transactions in
64 organs may deceptively seem advantageous to both the organ buyer and seller, although in reality
65 they are far from it. While the notion of buying sex — prostitution — meets widespread disapproval,
66 many people accept the buying of kidneys as a legitimate solution for the shortage of organs for
67 transplantation.
68 Governments also struggle to consider organ-trade participants as offenders, even when they break
69 the law. Physicians, with an aura of respectability, hardly 3 seem like shady criminals; and patients
70 fighting for their lives have the authorities’ sympathy. Cracking down on the organ trade would
71 condemn these patients to dialysis — an excruciating treatment that is also very costly for the health-
72 care system — or, worse, to death.
80 My analysis shows that the medical community’s efforts indeed had an impact. Physicians’ advocacy,
81 together with media criticism, brought Israel and Pakistan to pass laws against organ trafficking. The
82 two countries’ involvement in the organ trade saw significant reduction, but not complete elimination
83 — as the recent raid in Pakistan demonstrates. Legislative prohibitions ultimately mean little without
84 vigorous enforcement, which requires sustained pressure on government authorities. Since the organ
85 trade ranks low in the latter’s priorities, it is the job of the medical community, civil society and the
86 media to raise public awareness and demand action. Tough enforcement, alongside policies to
87 encourage altruistic organ donation, will go a long way toward abolishing the organ trade.
88
89
90
91 Adapted from https://www.washingtonpost.com/gdpr-consent/?next_url=https%3a%2f%2fwww.washingtonpost.com%2fnews%2fmonkey-cage%2fwp%2f2016%2f12%2f07%2forgan-traffickers-lock-up-people-to-
92 harvest-their-kidneys-here-are-the-politics-behind-the-organ-trade%2f